International Civil Aviation Organization Runway Safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States Amsterdam, 8 March 2012 Nicolas Rallo Regional Officer,

International Civil Aviation Organization

Runway Safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States

Amsterdam, 8 March 2012Nicolas Rallo

Regional Officer, SafetyEuropean and North Atlantic Office

2Runway Safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States. Amsterdam, 8 March 2012

The figures for EUR/NAT States

The RASG-EUR, a new group to coordinate safety issues throughout the EUR/NAT region

Next Steps

Briefing Overview

Runway Safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States. Amsterdam, 8 March 2012 3



Montréal

ICAO Regional Offices: areas of accreditation

Cairo

BangkokDakar

NairobiLima

Mexico City

Paris

Runway Safety Related

System or Component Failure

Turbulence

Other

Loss of Control Inflight

Controlled Flight into Terrain

Unknown

Inflight Fire

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Fatalities Fatal Accidents Accidents

Percentage of All Accidents



Turbulence

Other



Unknown

Inflight Fire

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%





Turbulence

Other



Unknown

Inflight Fire

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%



5

Global Accidents (2006-2010): Main KillersAccidents & Related Fatalities by Occurrence Categories

Scheduled Commercial Traffic – MTOW > 2 250 kg (Yrs 2006- 2010 )


Loss of Control In-flight


ICAO SAFETY PRIORITIES

Runway Safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States. Amsterdam, 8 March 2012


EUR/NAT Accidents (2006-2010): Main KillersAccidents & Related Fatalities by Occurrence Categories

Scheduled Commercial Traffic – MTOW > 2 250 kg (Yrs 2006- 2010 )

Runway safety related

System or component failure

Other

Turbulence

Loss of control inflight

Controlled flight into terrain

Inflight fire

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%


Runway safety related

System or component failure

Other

Turbulence

Loss of control inflight

Controlled flight into terrain

Inflight fire

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Focus on Runway Safety related accidents

Accidents & Related Fatalities by Occurrence CategoriesScheduled Commercial Traffic – MTOW > 2 250 kg (Yrs 2006- 2010 )

7

Focus on EUR/NAT Region

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35% 33%30%

21%

17%

5%

94 accidents by occurrence category

note: accidents could have more than one occurrence category

Runway excursion / incursion

95%

Other5%

134 fatalities by occurrence category

62%

Accidents

Fatalities

17%

95%


Focus on Runway Excursions/Incursions

8

EUR/NAT carriers have 3 times more risks to experience a Runway Excursion/ Incursion outside EUR/NAT region than within the region.

APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

3%

11%

5%

20%

2%4% 5%

% of traffic flown by air carriers outside their own region

Source: OAG – 2010 scheduled commercial flights

APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

3%

17%14%

17%

13%

5%

0%

% of Runways Excursions/Incursions experienced by air carriers outside their own region

Scheduled Commercial Traffic MTOW > 2 250 kg (Yrs 2006- 2010 )

Traffic

Accidents

5%

14%

Focus on EUR/NAT Region

For EUR/NAT carriers: • within EUR/NAT: 0.3 runway ex/incursion per million departures• outside EUR/NAT: 1.0 runway ex/incursion per million departures .


RASG-EUR


Main objective of the RASG-EUR

To support the implementation of the GASP and GASR in the region.


Proposed Targets in revised GASP

Targets

– Significantly reduce the rate of runway safety related accidents and serious incidents;

– Significantly reduce the rate of loss of control in-flight related accidents and serious incidents;

– Continue to lower the rate of CFIT related accidents and serious incidents; and

– Significantly reduce the rate of accidents and serious incidents associated with system component failures


RASG-EUR Members and Partners

Membership:

RASG-EUR Members: Contracting States in the area of accreditation of EUR/NAT + EC, EASA, ECAC, EUROCONTROL & IAC

RASG-EUR Partners: International organisations, aviation industry representatives


Working method

The RASG-EUR/01 first met 23-24 Jan 2012It highlighted the necessity to:– avoid duplication with already established

mechanisms, in particular within the EU/EASA framework; and

– focus its efforts on the parts of the region which have not yet established a performance based aviation system and are lacking the required safety analysis capabilities


NEXT STEPS


RASG-EUR Coordination Group (RCOG)

Will meet on 24-25 April 2012Will prepare a work programme for the RASG-

EUR, including:

– the review of existing mechanisms and initiatives to address runway safety in the region; and

– the identification of any needs for additional actions in parts of the EUR/NAT region.


RASG-EUR Webpage

Final report of the RASG-EUR/01available at : http://www.paris.icao.int/documents_open_rasg-eur/show_file.php?id=448

http://www.paris.icao.int/documents_open_rasg-eur/show_file.php?id=448

http://www.paris.icao.int/documents_open_rasg-eur/show_file.php?id=448



The RASG-EUR, a new group to coordinate safety issues throughout the EUR/NAT region

Next Steps

Review

18Runway safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States. Amsterdam, 8 March 2012

Documents

International Civil Aviation Organization Runway Safety: a pan regional view for EUR/NAT States Amsterdam, 8 March 2012 Nicolas Rallo Regional Officer,