6
International Comparison

International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

International Comparison

Page 2: International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

Infrasturucture

2

Page 3: International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

Quality of overall infrastructure

How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony, and energy) in the country? (1 = extremely underdeveloped; 7 = extensive and efficient by international standards), 2010-2011, weighted average

Source: The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, World Economic Forum (WEF)http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf

China

The USA

Germany

Sweden

Finland

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Page 4: International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

Energy infrastructure

Energy infrastructure is adequate and efficient (1=worst; 10=best), 2012

Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2012http://www.imd.org/research/publications/wcy/World-Competitiveness-Yearbook-Results/#

China

The USA

Germany

Sweden

Finland

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Page 5: International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

Enterprises having access to the Internet

Source: Eurostat 2012http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-11-065/EN/KS-SF-11-065-EN.PDF

Enterprise size: 10 employed persons or more

Percentage of enterprises having access to the internet, 2011

EU27

Germany

Sweden

Finland

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100

Page 6: International Comparison. Infrasturucture 2 Quality of overall infrastructure How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony,

Quality of life

Quality of life is high (1=worst; 10=best), 2012

Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2012http://www.imd.org/research/publications/wcy/World-Competitiveness-Yearbook-Results/#

China

The USA

Germany

Sweden

Finland

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10