Upload
nikunj-gupta
View
3.791
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This Presentation is made by our Group during MBA for one of our Subjects \'International Competitiveness\'.
Citation preview
AUTOMOTIVE CLUSTER : GERMANY
GROUP 1
Cluster: Stuttgart
Education & Technology
From 19th century: government-financed system for education - focus on scientific research
Baden-Württemberg (Stuttgart region) : the most renowned universities in Germany
9 state universities - 3 privates - 22 public colleges Technologically oriented - offer special courses for the
automotive sector - more applied research Supply automotive companies with well trained, practical
specialists Government-financed system for research in technology,
science and business Science-based firms with in-house R&D laboratories
Growth Drivers
Demand After WWII: Federal Republic Of Germany (West) 1990: Germany reunification + 17 million people 1992: Maastricht Treaty - Creation of the European Market German consumers’ behavior - demand for high quality
products Engineering-driven concepts in Germany vs consumer-driven
convenience concepts in cars in the US
Government Policy 19th century : Abolishment of traditional restrictions on the
freedom to engage in business Infrastructure: launch of construction of roads and canals,
encouragement of railway construction
Growth Drivers
Development of the Industry
Stuttgart region: development of the 1st ever automobile in the 1887 by Carl Benz and Gottlieb Daimler
Development of DaimlerChrysler, Porsche & Bosch
1800s:import of technical know-how from Britain and Belgium in machine-building, iron and steel industries
1920s: Industry consisted of 150 small automotive/components producers
1934: Nazi government ordered the industry to standardize production
Formation of Automotive Industry Economic Group 1930s: Nazi government initiatives – production going from
52,000 to 352,ooo units Late 1930s: 3rd largest automobile manufacturer in the world
Porter 5 ForcesBargaining Power of
Supplier• Medium
(Switching Cost, Product Quality & technology)
Intense Rivalry VW, M.Benz, Porsche,
Opel(Innovation,
Differentiation, Price, Volume, Technology)
Bargaining Power of Buyer
• Medium(not many options)
• Generate better quality
Barriers to Entry (new entrants)
• High Capital• High R&D
• Technical Expertise• Economies of Scale• Supply/dist. network
Threat of Substitutes• SMALL
• Electric Cars*• Solar Cars*
Porter DiamondFirm strategy, structure &
rivalry:•Support for National companies• Hierarchical & rigid internal
structure• Trade Unions
• Main strategy: Quality• Associations with in Industry• R&D, innovation vs. Lock-ins &
Spill-over
Related & supporting industries:
• Iron and Steel industry• Education
• Component suppliers & IT• Trade Association (VRS & WRS)
Factor conditions:• Geographical (logistics)
• Infrastructure• Skilled Labour• Technological
• Non-pecuniary externality
Demand Conditions:• High internal demand• European Union• Government
LinkagesGovernment and StateBaden-Württemberg.The Stuttgart Region Economic Development Corporation
Vehicle design and assemblyDaimler ChryslerPorscheAudi
Education and researchUniversities atHeidelberg,TübingenFreiburg, StuttgartKarlsruhe, Mannheimplus special courses at technical collegesInstitute for Vehicle Concepts
Tyre IndustryContinental
EnginesEberspächer diesel heaters
Vehicle PartsBosch. Largest in world
Aerospace industryEADS with Dornier,DASA Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik
Production equipment
LogisticsWincanton
Vehicle components Approx 200 plantsMahle – engine components /pistonsMahle/knecht - filtersMann + Hummel - Filter and air systemsBeru Ignition technology Friedrichshafen AG transmissions and steering
GlassSaint-Gobain Sekurit
Plastics/ ChemicalsBehr - Paints
Buses/ Agricultural vehiclesNeoplan (Man) Kässbohrer, Iveco, John Deere, Evo Bus, and Mercedes-Benz
ElectronicsBeru
Innovative technologyBertrandt
Information technologyDassault
Metal manufacture/processingThyssen
Future Challenges
External and Internal (Macro)• National Framework vs. Regional Framework• Ambiguity in defn. vs. interconnectedness among firms• Cluster Development – Present: exception vs. Future: Rule?• EU (Lisbon treaty) : Opportunity vs. threat• Cluster Policy vs. private cluster initiatives
Indirect vs. Direct (Micro)• Maturity vs. depth• Convergence (Cooptation) vs. divergence (PPP)• Institutional arrangements vs. Implementation Framework• Competition (Lock-ins) vs. sustainability (continuous innovation)• Congestion vs. growth• Brand management (takeovers) vs. B2B, B2C, Value chain cost
reduction
Q&A?
THANK YOU!
References:
• Gert Hermann- The Eastern German Automobile Cluster
• Joseph Cortright- Making sense of Clusters
• Dr. Heinz- Automotive Clusters in Germany
• Dr. Holger- Cluster Platform for Innovative Railway Technology in Bavaria
• Dina Lonescu- What are Clusters?
• Alex Burfitt- The Challenges of Pursuing Cluster Policy in the Congested State
• European Commission- Cluster Building and Networking
• EMCC- The Automotive Cluster in Baden-Wuttemberg, Germany
• The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009
• Kristian Ketels- European Clusters