Upload
duongcong
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 66
STUDY OF ION SOLVENT INTERACTION OF GLUCOSE IN WATER-METHANOL AND ETHANOL- ULTRASONICALLY
VERMA RC1, SINGH AP1, GUPTA J2, GUPTA R2 1. Department of Chemistry, Janta P.G. College Bakewar, Etawah. 2. Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Post-Chaumuha, Mathura, Utter Pradesh, India.
Accepted Date: 24/04/2014; Published Date: 27/06/2014
Abstract: Ultrasonic velocity, density and viscosity in binary liquid mixtures of Glucose in water, methyl alcohol and ethyl alcohol. Density, viscosity and ultrasound velocity have been determined at 00C over the entire composition range. By measuring above parameters
isentropic compressibility (s), Intermolecular free length (Lf), apparent molar compressibility
(k) and Specific viscosity (sp) have been computed. The isentropic compressibility of binary mixture exhibits negative deviation while density, viscosity and ultrasound velocity exhibit positive deviations from ideal behavior over the entire molar concentration.
Keywords: Isentropic Compressibility, Apparent Molar Compressibility Ultrasound Velocity
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND BIO-SCIENCE
PAPER-QR CODE
Corresponding Author: MR. RAJESH CHANDRA VERMA
Access Online On:
www.ijprbs.com
How to Cite This Article:
Verma RC, Singh AP, Gupta J, Gupta R; IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 67
INTRODUCTION
Ultrasound is the part of science of acoustics which is concerned with phenomenon of
frequencies above the upper audible limit ultrasound propagation parameters yields valuable
information regarding the behaviour of liquid binary system because the intermolecular
association dipolar effect the compressibility of the system which is turn produces
corresponding variation in the compressibility of the system which is turn produces
corresponding variation in the ultrasound velocity; Padamsree and Prasad1 investigated the
molecular interaction based on all excess thermodynamic parameters such as volumes,
viscosities and internal pressure, adiabatic compressibility, free length and enthalpy in the
binary mixture of n-butane and ethyl acetate at 300C. Rajendran2 studied ultrasound velocity,
density and viscosity in the binary mixture if n-heptanes with n-propanol, iso-opropanol, iso-
opropanol, n and iso-butanol over the entire of mole fractions at a constant temperature of
298.15K. Verma and coworkers 3-4 investigated the molecular interaction in Eusol in Di ethyl
ether and acetaldehyde, hexanol-1 with toluene and benzene. Ramesh et.al5 studied the regent
benzyl hydrazine has been used for the spectrophotometer of lead in water samples. Angelo
et.al6 studied the ultrasound velocity of alkali halogen salt in method and suggested that
compressibility lowering depended on the anion irrespective of caution.
The present investigation deals with study of the excess isentropic compressibility (S),
intermolecular free length (Lf), apparent molal adiabatic (k) and specific viscosity (sp) for
binary mixture of glucose in ethyl alcohol at 30°C. These systems are typical binary mixtures
with wide scope for complication through hydrogen bonding.
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
Glucose was purchased from Chemical Drug House (CDH) New Delhi. All reagents were used of
analytic al Grade.
EXPERIMENTAL DETAIL:
All the liquids used in the present study have been distilled of remove impurities by standard
procedures. The purity of each sample was checked by comparing the measured densities of
compounds with those reported in the measured densities of compounds with those reported
in the literature7. Ultrasound velocities were measured using single crystal ultrasound
interferometer of 2 MHz frequency and data were accurate up to 0.2% densities of the mixture
have been determined by using specific gravity bottle and electronic balance. The viscosities
have been determined by using Ostwald viscometer. The temperature was maintained by
circulating water around liquid melt from a thermostat controlled at 30°C. The value of
isentropic compressibility (S) was calculated by using the relation:
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 68
S= 1/(v2)
Intermolecular free length (Lf) has been calculated by using the formula:
Lf= KS
Where, K is Jacobson constant.
Apparent molal adiabatic compressibility (k) has been calculated by using the formula:
k= 1000 (os-so) + s/ Cpo o * m
Where, m is the molecular weight of solute. C is the Concentration in mole per later of solute.
Specific (sp) has been calculated by using the formula:
RESULT & DISCUSSION:
The value of ultrasound velocity (V) density (), viscosity (), isentropic compressibility (s),
intermolecular free length (Lf) apparent molal adiabatic compressibility (k) and specific
viscosity (sp) are represented in tables (1-3). The concentration curves are also plotted in fig
(1-6).Molecular concentration of glucose, density, ultrasound velocity viscosity, isentropic
compressibility, intermolecular free length, apparent adiabatic molal compressibility and
specific viscosity for the binary mixture at 30°C.
By the study of above tables & figures we conclude that ultrasound velocity increase
with increasing molecular concentration of solution. Density and viscosity are also increases on
increasing molecular concentration of solution. It is ambitious that the moles of glucose are so
dense that their density is more in compare to solvent.
The result show that density increases while the isentropic compressibility decreases with
increasing concentration and so the quantity dv/dc is positive while ds/e is negative. The
result reported for electrolytic solution 8 which shown that Glucose behaves as simple
electrolytic.
The variation intermolecular free length with molar concentration of glucose in water,
methanol & ethanol is shown in fig. 1 & 2 at 30°C. It decreases with increasing molar
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 69
concentration and the slope of lines is found to be negative. Linear decrease of Lf has also been
reported for oxalic acid dehydrates in tetra hydro furan by Ravi Chandran et. al9.
The variation of k with molar concentration of solutions at 300C in fig. 3, 4 & 5. Molal
compressibility varies linearly with the molar concentration slope of line is found to be positive
in each solution fig. 6 shows the variation of sp with molar concentration. The slope of lines is
found to be positive in each solution.
Table 1. Ultrasound velocity (V), Density (), Viscosity (), Isentropic compressibility (s),
Intermolecular free length (Lf), apparent molar compressibility (k) and Specific viscosity (sp)
value of different molecular Concentration of binary mixture (Glucose and Water)
Table 2. Ultrasound velocity (V), Density (), Viscosity (), Isentropic compressibility (s),
Intermolecular free length (Lf), apparent molar compressibility (k) and Specific viscosity (sp)
value of different molecular Concentration of binary mixture (Glucose and Methanol)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 70
Table 3. Ultrasound velocity (V), Density (), Viscosity (), Isentropic compressibility (s),
Intermolecular free length (Lf), apparent molar compressibility (k) and Specific viscosity (sp)
value of different molecular Concentration of binary mixture (Glucose and Ethanol)
Figure 1. Molecular Concentration Vs Intermolecular Free Length of binary mixture (Lf) A°
(Glucose + Methanol, Glucose + Ethanol)
Figure 2. Molecular Concentration Vs Intermolecular Free Length of binary mixture (Lf) A°
(Glucose + Ethanol)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 71
Figure 3. Molecular Concentration Vs Molal Adiabatic compressibility (k) (Glucose + Water)
Figure 4. Molecular Concentration Vs Molal Adiabatic compressibility (k) (Glucose + Methanol)
Figure 5. Molecular Concentration Vs Molal Adiabatic compressibility (k) (Glucose + Ethanol)
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Verma RC, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 66-72 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 72
Figure 6. Molecular Concentration Vs Specific viscosity (sp) (Glucose + Ethanol, Glucose +
Ethanol, Glucose + Methanol)
REFERENCE
1. Pasamsree & Prasad, KR: Ind. J. Pure & Appl. Phys. 1995; 33.
2. Rajendra, V: Ind.J.Pure& Appl.Phys. 1996;34: 52-56.
3. Verma, R.C., Raghav S., Chauhan N., Rauki, & Singh, AP: Res. J. Recent Sci. 2012; 2 and
2013;1-06.
4. Verma, RC and Singh, S: Ori. J. of Cham. 2006; 22(3):671-673.
5. Ramesh, M, Chandra Sekhar, KB & Hussain Raddy, K: Ind. J. Chem. 2000; 39A:1337-1339.
6. Angelo, D, Sachiera, S & Jacobson, B: Soc. Ind. Prog. Sci. (SPIS) Tech. 1961; 3-4:161.
7. Jacobson, B. Acta Chem. Scand. 1952; 6:1485..
8. Prakash, S & Chaturvedi, CV Ind. J. Chem. 1972;10: 669.
9. Ravichandran, G, Srinivas Rao, A & Nambinarayana, TK: Ind. J. Pure & Appl. Phys. 1994; 32:
59-51.