Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTERNATIONALLAW REPORTS
Volume 161
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
Volumes published under the title:
ANNUAL DIGEST AND REPORTSOF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW CASES
Volumes published under the title:
INTERNATIONAL LAW REPORTS
Vol. 1 (1919-22)Vol. 2 (1923-24) g Edited by Sir John Fischer Williams, KC,
and H. Lauterpacht, LLD
Vol. 3 (1925-26)Vol. 4 (1927-28) g Edited by Arnold D. McNair, CBE, LLD,
and H. Lauterpacht, LLD
Vol. 5 (1929-30)Vol. 6 (1931-32)Vol. 7 (1933-34)Vol. 8 (1935-37)Vol. 9 (1938-40)Vol. 10 (1941-42)Vol. 11 (1919-42)Vol. 12 (1943-45)Vol. 13 (1946)Vol. 14 (1947)Vol. 15 (1948)Vol. 16 (1949)
Edited by H. Lauterpacht, QC, LLD, FBA
9>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;
Vol. 17 (1950)Vol. 18 (1951)Vol. 19 (1952)Vol. 20 (1953)Vol. 21 (1954)Vol. 22 (1955)Vol. 23 (1956)
Edited by Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, QC, LLD, FBA
Vol. 24 (1957) Edited by Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, QC, LLD, FBA,and E. Lauterpacht
Vol. 25 (1958-I)Vol. 26 (1958-II) g Edited by E. Lauterpacht, QC
Vols. 27-68 and Consolidated Tables and Index to Vols. 1-35 and 36-45Edited by E. Lauterpacht, QC
Vols. 69-150 and Consolidated Index and Consolidated Tables of Casesand Treaties to Vols. 1-80, Vols. 81-100and Vols. 1-125
Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, CBE, QC,and Sir Christopher Greenwood, CMG, QC
Vols. 151-61 Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, CBE, QC, LLD,Sir Christopher Greenwood, CMG, QC,and K. L. Lee
9>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>=>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>;
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
Lauterpacht Centre for International LawUniversity of Cambridge
INTERNATIONALLAW REPORTS
VOLUME161
Edited by
SIR ELIHU LAUTERPACHT, cbe, qc, lldHonorary Professor of International Law, University of Cambridge
Bencher of Gray’s Inn
SIR CHRISTOPHER GREENWOOD, cmg, qcJudge of the International Court of Justice
Bencher of Middle Temple
and
KAREN LEEFellow of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge
Vice-Mistress and Fellow of Girton College, Cambridge
G R O T I U S P U B L I C A T I O N S
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge.
It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit ofeducation, learning and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
www.cambridge.orgInformation on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107058958
© Cambridge University Press 2016
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exceptionand to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2016
Printed in the United Kingdom by TJ International Ltd. Padstow Cornwall
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-107-05895-8 Hardback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracyof URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication,
and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,accurate or appropriate.
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
CONTENTS
Preface vii
Page
Editorial Note ix
Table of Cases (alphabetical) xiii
Table of Cases (according to courts and countries) xv
Digest (main headings) xvii
Digest of Cases Reported in Volume 161 xix
Table of Treaties xxv
Reports of Cases 1
Index 740
v
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
PREFACE
The present volume is devoted to international jurisprudence.It contains the 2008 order and 2011 judgment of the InternationalCourt of Justice in the Application of the International Convention onthe Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v.Russian Federation) together with related cases before the EuropeanCourt of Human Rights (Georgia v. Russia (Nos 1 and 2)). Internationaljurisprudence is also reflected in the judgment of the European Court ofHuman Rights in Hassan v. United Kingdom and in Opinion 2/13 ofthe Court of Justice of the European Union concerning accession of theEuropean Union to the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Editors wish to thank the many people whose work has madethis volume possible. Miss Maureen MacGlashan, CMG compiledthe Table of Treaties and the Index. Mrs Diane Ilott checked the copyand Mrs Jenny Macgregor read the proofs. Ms Karen Lee preparedthe Tables of Cases and the Digest and saw the volume throughthe press.
Finally, our thanks go to all the others who have worked to com-plete this volume, particularly our publishers, Cambridge UniversityPress, and typesetters, SPi, and their staff.
E. LAUTERPACHTLauterpacht Centre
for International Law,
University of Cambridge
C. J. GREENWOODThe Peace Palace,
The Hague
K. L. LEELauterpacht Centre
for International Law,
University of Cambridge
April 2015
vii
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
EDITORIAL NOTE
The International Law Reports endeavour to provide within a singleseries of volumes comprehensive access in English to judicial materialsbearing on public international law. On certain topics it is not alwayseasy to draw a clear line between cases which are essentially ones ofpublic international law interest and those which are primarily applica-tions of special domestic rules. For example, in relation to extradition,the Reports will include cases which bear on the exception of “politicaloffences” or the rule of double criminality, but will restrict the numberof cases dealing with purely procedural aspects of extradition. Similarly,while the general rules relating to the admission and exclusion of aliens,especially of refugees, are of international legal interest, cases on theprocedure of admission usually are not. In such borderline areas, andsometimes also where there is a series of domestic decisions all dealingwith a single point in essentially the same manner, only one illustrativedecision will be printed and references to the remainder will be given inan accompanying note.
Decisions of International Tribunals
The Reports seek to include so far as possible the available decisions ofevery international tribunal, e.g. the International Court of Justice, orad hoc arbitrations between States. There are, however, some jurisdic-tions to which full coverage cannot be given, either because of the largenumber of decisions (e.g. the Administrative Tribunal of the UnitedNations) or because not all the decisions bear on questions of publicinternational law (e.g. the Court of Justice of the European Union). Inthese instances, those decisions are selected which appear to have thegreatest long-term value.
Human rights cases. The number of decisions on questions ofinternational protection of human rights has increased considerablyin recent years and it is now impossible for the Reports to cover themall. As far as decisions of international jurisdictions are concerned, theReports will continue to publish decisions of the European Court ofHuman Rights and of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, aswell as “views” of the United Nations Human Rights Committee.Decisions of national courts on the application of conventions onhuman rights will not be published unless they deal with a major pointof substantive human rights law or a matter of wider interest to public
ix
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
international lawyers such as the relationship of international law andnational law, the extent of the right of derogation or the principles ofthe interpretation of treaties.
International arbitrations. The Reports of course include arbitralawards rendered in cases between States which involve an applicationof public international law. Beyond this, however, the selection ofarbitral decisions is more open to debate. As these Reports are princi-pally concerned with matters of public international law, they will notinclude purely private law commercial arbitrations even if they areinternational in the sense that they arise between parties of differentnationality and even if one of them is a State. (For reports of a numberof such awards, see Yearbook Commercial Arbitration (ed. Albert Jan vanden Berg, under the auspices of the International Council for Com-mercial Arbitration).) But where there is a sufficient point of contactwith public international law then the relevant parts of the award willbe reported. Examples of such points of contact are cases in which thecharacter of a State as a party has some relevance (e.g. State immunity,stabilization clauses, force majeure) or where there is a choice of lawproblem involving discussion of international law or general principlesof law as possible applicable laws. The same criteria will determine theselection of decisions of national courts regarding the enforcement ofarbitral awards.
Decisions of National Tribunals
A systematic effort is made to collect from all national jurisdictionsthose judicial decisions which have some bearing on international law.
Editorial Treatment of Materials
The basic policy of the Editors is, so far as possible, to present thematerial in its original form. It is no part of the editorial function toimpose on the decisions printed in these volumes a uniformity ofapproach or style which they do not possess. Editorial intervention islimited to the introduction of the summary and of the bold-letterrubric at the head of each case. This is followed by the full text ofthe original decision or of its translation. Normally, the only passageswhich will be omitted are those which contain either statements of facthaving no bearing on the points of international law involved in thecase or discussion of matters of domestic law unrelated to the points ofinternational legal interest. The omission of material is usually indi-cated either by a series of dots or by the insertion of a sentence in squarebrackets noting the passages which have been left out.
x EDITORIAL NOTE
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
Presentation of Materials
The material in the volume has been typeset for this volume. Thesource of all such material is indicated by the reference to the “Report”in square brackets at the end of the case. The language of the originaldecision is also mentioned there. The bold figures in square brackets inthe body of the text in non-English cases indicate the pagination of theoriginal report.
Notes
Footnotes. Footnotes enclosed in square brackets are editorial insertions.All other footnotes are part of the original report.
Other notes. References to cases deemed not to be sufficientlysubstantial to warrant reporting will occasionally be found in editorialnotes either at the end of a report of a case on a similar point or underan independent heading.
Digest of Cases
With effect from Volume 75 the decisions contained in the Reports areno longer arranged according to the traditional classification scheme.Instead a Digest of Cases is published at the beginning of each volume.The main headings of the Digest are arranged alphabetically. Undereach heading brief details are given of those cases reported in thatvolume which contain points covered by that heading. Each entry inthe Digest gives the name of the case concerned and the page reference,the name of the tribunal which gave the decision and an indication ofthe main points raised in the case which relate to that particularheading of the Digest. Where a case raises points which concern severaldifferent areas of international law, entries relating to that case willappear under each of the relevant headings in the Digest. A list of themain headings used in the Digest is set out at p. xvii.
Consolidated Index and Tables
A Consolidated Index and a Consolidated Tables of Cases and Treatiesfor volumes 1-80 were published in two volumes in 1990 and 1991.A further volume containing the Consolidated Index and ConsolidatedTables of Cases and Treaties for volumes 81-100 was published in1996. A Consolidated Index, a Consolidated Tables of Cases and aConsolidated Table of Treaties for volumes 1-125 were published in2004. Volume 160 contains Consolidated Tables of Cases for volumes126-160.
EDITORIAL NOTE xi
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDALPHABETICAL
(Cases which are reported only in a note are distinguished from cases which arereported in full by the insertion of the word “note” in parentheses after the page numberof the report.)
Application of the InternationalConvention on the Elimination of AllForms of Racial Discrimination (Georgiav. Russian Federation) (ProvisionalMeasures) (Preliminary Objections) 1
Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No13255/07) (Admissibility) (Merits) 333
Georgia v. Russia (No 2) (Application No38263/08) (Admissibility) 487, 523(note)
Georgia v. Russian Federation (Applicationof the International Convention on theElimination of All Forms of RacialDiscrimination) (Provisional Measures)(Preliminary Objections) 1
Hassan v. United Kingdom (ApplicationNo 29750/09) (Merits) 524
Opinion 2/13 (Accession of the EuropeanUnion to the European Convention onHuman Rights) 600
xiii
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
TABLE OF CASES REPORTEDARRANGED ACCORDING TO COURTS ANDTRIBUNALS (INTERNATIONAL CASES) AND
COUNTRIES (MUNICIPAL CASES)
(Cases which are reported only in a note are distinguished from cases which arereported in full by the insertion of the word “note” in parentheses after the page numberof the report.)
I. DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS
European Court of Human Rights
2009Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No
13255/07) (Admissibility) 333, 337
2011Georgia v. Russia (No 2) (Application No
38263/08) (Admissibility) 487, 523(note)
2014Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No
13255/07) (Merits) 333, 360Hassan v. United Kingdom (Application
No 29750/09) (Merits) 524
European Union, Court of Justice
2014Opinion 2/13 (Accession of the European
Union to the European Convention onHuman Rights) 600
International Court of Justice
2008Georgia v. Russian Federation (Application
of the International Convention on theElimination of All Forms of RacialDiscrimination) (Provisional Measures)1, 12
2011Georgia v. Russian Federation (Application
of the International Convention on theElimination of All Forms of RacialDiscrimination) (PreliminaryObjections) 1, 64
xv
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
DIGEST OF CASESList of Main Headings
(Those headings for which there are entries in the present volume are printed in italics.For a guide to the Digest, see the Editorial Note at p. xi.)
Air
Aliens
Arbitration
Canals
Claims
Comity
Conciliation
Consular Relations
Damages
Diplomatic Relations
Economics, Trade and Finance
Environment
Expropriation
Extradition
Governments
Human Rights
International Court of Justice
International Criminal Law
International Organizations
International Tribunals
Jurisdiction
Lakes and Landlocked Seas
Nationality
Recognition
Relationship of International Lawand Municipal Law
Reprisals and Countermeasures
Rivers
Sea
Sources of International Law
Space
State Immunity
State Responsibility
State Succession
States
Territory
Terrorism
Treaties
War and Armed Conflict
xvii
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
DIGEST OF CASESREPORTED IN VOLUME 161
AliensPage
Expulsion — Collective expulsion — Arrests and detention —European Convention on Human Rights — Protocol No 4 —Prohibition of arbitrary expulsion— Arbitrary nature of collectiveexpulsion and arrests which preceded it — Russian expulsion ofGeorgian nationals in 2006— European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No 13255/07) (Admis-sibility) (Merits) 333
ClaimsEvidence—Human rights claims— Admissibility of evidence—Burden of proof — European Court of Human Rights — Effectof role of the Court on approach to evidence— Absence of formalrules on admissibility of evidence — Circumstances in whichburden of proof shifts to government — Injury and death incustody — European Court of Human Rights
Hassan v. United Kingdom (Application No 29750/09) (Merits) 524
Local remedies rule — Application in human rights cases —European Convention on Human Rights, Article 35(1) —Inter-State case — Allegation of administrative practice inviolation of the Convention— European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No 13255/07) (Admis-sibility) (Merits) 333
Local remedies rule — Application in human rights cases —European Convention on Human Rights, Article 35(1) —Inter-State case — Allegation of administrative practice inviolation of the Convention— European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 2) (Application No 38263/08) (Admis-sibility) 487
Human RightsAliens — Expulsion — Collective expulsion — Arrests anddetention — Deprivation of liberty — Protection against
xix
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
Human Rights (cont.)
arbitrary treatment — Conditions of detention — Whetheramounting to inhuman and degrading treatment — Duty toprovide a remedy — Discrimination — European Conventionon Human Rights, Articles 3, 5, 13 and Article 4 of ProtocolNo 4 — Rule on exhaustion of domestic remedies — EuropeanConvention on Human Rights, Article 35(1) — Applicability ininter-State case— Administrative practice allegedly in violation ofthe Convention — European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No 13255/07) (Admis-sibility) (Merits) 333
Treaties — European Convention on Human Rights —Participation — European Union — Draft agreement foraccession of European Union to European Convention onHuman Rights — Whether compatible with European Unionlaw — Autonomy of European Union legal order — EuropeanUnion not to be equated to a State — Court of Justice of theEuropean Union
Opinion 2/13 (Accession of the European Union to the EuropeanConvention on Human Rights) 600
Treaties — Interpretation of human rights treaties —Compromissory clauses — Convention on the Elimination ofAll Forms of Racial Discrimination, Article 22 — Whetherimposing preconditions on the seisin of the International Courtof Justice — Scope of application of Convention — Whetherapplicable extraterritorially — Conflict between Georgia andRussian Federation in 2008 — Allegations of ethnic cleansing inAbkhazia and South Ossetia — Whether dispute regarding theinterpretation or application of the Convention — InternationalCourt of Justice
Application of the International Convention on the Eliminationof All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. RussianFederation) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) 1
Treaties — Scope of application — European Convention onHuman Rights, Article 1 — Application during internationalarmed conflict — Application to State in respect of eventsoutside territory of that State — Relationship betweenConvention and international humanitarian law — Arrest anddetention — Article 5 — Detention of prisoner of war underThird Geneva Convention, 1949 — Detention of civilian on
xx DIGEST OF CASES
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
security grounds under Fourth Geneva Convention, 1949 —Whether compatible with Article 5 — Article 2 — Extent ofduty to investigate death — European Court of Human Rights
Hassan v. United Kingdom (Application No 29750/09) (Merits) 524
Treaties — Scope of application — European Convention onHuman Rights, Article 1 — Application during internationalarmed conflict — Application to State in respect of eventsoutside territory of that State — Rule on exhaustion of domesticremedies — European Convention on Human Rights, Article35(1) — Applicability in inter-State case — Administrativepractice allegedly in violation of the Convention — Conflictbetween Georgia and Russian Federation in 2008 — Joinder ofissues to the merits — Six-month time limit — Similaritiesbetween case and case before International Court of Justice —European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 2) (Application No 38263/08) (Admis-sibility) 487
International Court of JusticeJurisdiction — Consent of States as basis of jurisdiction —Dispute — Definition of dispute — Convention on theElimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Article 22 —Types of dispute covered by Article 22 — Conflict betweenGeorgia and Russian Federation in 2008 — Whether disputebetween the Parties regarding the interpretation or applicationof the Convention — Date on which dispute came intoexistence — Whether Article 22 imposing preconditions onseisin of the Court — Requirement of negotiations —Relationship between decision on prima facie basis of jurisdictionat provisional measures stage and definitive ruling onjurisdiction — Whether compromissory clauses in human rightstreaties requiring different approach to interpretation —International Court of Justice
Application of the International Convention on the Eliminationof All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. RussianFederation) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) 1
Provisional measures of protection — Criteria for indication ofmeasures — Prima facie basis for jurisdiction — Application byGeorgia against Russian Federation — Convention on theElimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Article 22 —Whether prima facie basis for jurisdiction — Measures must be
DIGEST OF CASES xxi
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
International Court of Justice (cont.)
designed to protect rights which might form the subject-matter of ajudgment — Requirement of urgency — International Court ofJustice
Application of the International Convention on the Eliminationof All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. RussianFederation) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) 1
International OrganizationsPersonality — Responsibility — Division of functions betweenorganization and members — European Union — Accession tothe European Convention on Human Rights — Attribution ofacts to Member States or the Union — Question of EuropeanUnion law— Autonomy of European Union legal order— Courtof Justice of the European Union
Opinion 2/13 (Accession of the European Union to the EuropeanConvention on Human Rights) 600
United Nations— Security Council— Exchanges between Statesin meetings of Security Council — Whether capable ofestablishing existence of dispute — Whether capable ofconstituting attempt to resolve dispute by negotiation —International Court of Justice
Application of the International Convention on the Eliminationof All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. RussianFederation) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) 1
International TribunalsCourtof Justice of theEuropeanUnion—EuropeanCourt ofHumanRights — Proposed accession of European Union to EuropeanConvention on Human Rights—Degree to which judgments of theEuropean Court of Human Rights to bind European Union and itsinstitutions — Procedure — Co-respondent procedure —Mechanism for prior involvement of Court of Justice of theEuropean Union— Court of Justice of the European Union
Opinion 2/13 (Accession of the European Union to the EuropeanConvention on Human Rights) 600
European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction —Procedure — Decisions on admissibility — Joinder of issues tothe merits — European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 1) (Application No 13255/07) (Admis-sibility) (Merits) 333
xxii DIGEST OF CASES
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction —Procedure — Decisions on admissibility — Joinder of issues tothe merits — European Court of Human Rights
Georgia v. Russia (No 2) (Application No 38263/08) (Admis-sibility) 487
European Court of Human Rights — Role and function —Evidence — Burden of proof — European Court of HumanRights
Hassan v. United Kingdom (Application No 29750/09) (Merits) 524
StatesCharacteristics — European Union — European Union not aState — Proposed participation in the European Convention onHuman Rights — Court of Justice of the European Union
Opinion 2/13 (Accession of the European Union to the EuropeanConvention on Human Rights) 600
TreatiesInterpretation — Principles of interpretation — Principle ofeffet utile — Role within framework of treaty interpretation —Human rights treaties — Compromissory clauses — Conventionon the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,Article 22 — Approach to interpretation — International Courtof Justice
Application of the International Convention on the Elim-ination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgiav. Russian Federation) (Provisional Measures) (PreliminaryObjections) 1
Interpretation — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,1969, Article 31(3) — Human rights treaties — EuropeanConvention on Human Rights — Subsequent practice —Relevance of other rules of international law applicable betweenthe parties — Relationship between Convention and rules ofhumanitarian law — Practice of States party to the EuropeanConvention involved in international armed conflict — Absenceof derogations from the Convention — European Court ofHuman Rights
Hassan v. United Kingdom (Application No 29750/09) (Merits) 524
DIGEST OF CASES xxiii
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
War and Armed ConflictApplicable law — Relationship between internationalhumanitarian law and human rights law — EuropeanConvention on Human Rights — European Court of HumanRights
Georgia v. Russia (No 2) (Application No 38263/08) (Admis-sibility) 487
International armed conflict — Conflict between Georgia andRussia in 2008 — Conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia —Ethnic cleansing — Whether giving rise to dispute withinConvention on the Elimination of All Forms of RacialDiscrimination, Article 22 — International Court of Justice
Application of the International Convention on the Eliminationof All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. RussianFederation) (Provisional Measures) (Preliminary Objections) 1
International armed conflict — Relationship betweeninternational humanitarian law and human rights law —Prisoners of war — Civilians — Arrest and detention —Whether detention in accordance with Third Geneva Conventionor Fourth Geneva Convention contrary to Article 5(1) of theEuropean Convention on Human Rights — European Court ofHuman Rights
Hassan v. United Kingdom (Application No 29750/09) (Merits) 524
xxiv DIGEST OF CASES
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
TABLE OF TREATIES
This table contains a list, in chronological order according to the date ofsignature, of the treaties referred to in the decisions printed in the presentvolume. It has not been possible to draw a helpful distinction between treatiesjudicially considered and treaties which are merely cited.
In the case of bilateral treaties, the names of the parties are given inalphabetical order and references to the texts of treaties have been supplied,including wherever possible at least one reference to a text in the Englishlanguage unless these are known to be included in the Flare Index to Treatiesavailable at http://ials.sas.ac.uk/treatyindex.htm. Multilateral treaties, allincluded in the Flare Index, are referred to by the name by which they arebelieved commonly to be known.
1919June 28 Covenant of the League of Nations (Part I of the Treaty of
Versailles)Art. 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
1920Dec. 16 Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)
Art. 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232-40Art. 36(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246-7, 250-1
1945June 26 Charter of the United Nations
Chapter VIIArt. 51 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28-9, 109-10
June 26 Statute of the International Court of JusticeChapter IArt. 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Chapter IIArt. 34(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66Art. 36 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240-5Art. 36(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65, 178-9Art. 36(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251-3, 284
Chapter IIIArt. 40(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21, 65Art. 40(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22, 65Art. 41 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-19, 32, 47, 50-5, 64-229Arts. 49-51. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191Art. 63(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
xxv
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
1948July 22 World Health Organization (WHO) Constitution (amended
1974, 1984, 1994 and 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
Dec. 9 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime ofGenocideArt. IX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
1949May 5 Statute of the Council of Europe
Preamble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680Art. 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680Art. 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680Art. 15(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680-1Art. 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681Art. 20(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 685Art. 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681
Aug. 12 Geneva Conventions Relative to the Protection of the Victims ofInternational Armed Conflicts (Common Articles)Art. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 587
Aug. 12 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War(Geneva Convention III)Art. 4A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 587, 590Art. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 590Art. 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 572-3Art. 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 587Art. 78 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7Art. 118 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7Art. 122 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536-7
Aug. 12 Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Personsin Time of War (Geneva Convention IV)Art. 42 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 587, 590Art. 43 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7, 586, 590Art. 78 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 586, 590Art. 133(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7Art. 133(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 544-7
Sept. 2 Council of Europe, General Agreement on Privileges andImmunitiesArts. 1-19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 696-7
xxvi TABLE OF TREATIES
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
1950Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, First Protocol (20 March 1952)Art. 1 . . . . . . . 339-41, 349-50, 352-3, 362, 364, 385, 418-20,
493, 497-8, 505-6, 510-11Art. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339-41, 349-50, 352-3, 362, 364, 385,
418-20, 493, 498, 505-6
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Second Protocol (6 May 1963) . . . . 687
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Third Protocol (6 May 1963) . . . . . 687
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Fourth Protocol (16 December 1963)686
Art. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490, 493, 498-9, 505-6, 516Art. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . 339-41, 345-9, 352, 362, 364, 385, 404-7,
414-17, 421, 429-34, 452-3
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rightsand Fundamental Freedoms, Fifth Protocol (20 January1966) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 687
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Sixth Protocol (28 April 1983) . . . . 686
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Seventh Protocol (22 November1984) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686
Art. 1 . . . . . . . . . . 339-41, 345-9, 352, 362, 364, 385, 417-18,422, 442-8, 457
Art. 4(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 644-5
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Eighth Protocol (European Commissionon Human Rights procedure (19 March 1985)) . . . . . . . . . . . 687
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Eleventh Protocol (11 May 1994)(ETS 155) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251-3, 259
TABLE OF TREATIES xxvii
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Twelfth Protocol (non-discrimination)(4 November 2000) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rightsand Fundamental Freedoms, Thirteenth Protocol concerningthe abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances(3 May 2002) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Fourteenth Protocol (amendment ofECHR control system) (13 May 2004) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 687
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Fifteenth Protocol (amendment ofConvention) (26 May 2015) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 687
Nov. 4 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms, Sixteenth Protocol (advisory opinions)(28 June 2013). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 640-2, 687, 730, 738
1956Dec. 15 Council of Europe General Agreement on Privileges and
Immunities, Second ProtocolArts. 2-6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 696-7
1957Mar. 25 Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community (Treaty
of Rome) (as amended by the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice)(EC) (numbers shown in square brackets indicate original treatynumbers). Repealed articles are shown as “repealed” at the pointsuggested by the article number in question, in square bracketsArt. [35] (repealed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 629
1958Apr. 29 Optional Protocol to the 1958 Law of the Sea Convention
concerning the Compulsory Settlement of DisputesArt. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74-5
1961Mar. 30 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs
Art. 48(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74-5, 143
xxviii TABLE OF TREATIES
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
1965Mar. 18 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between
States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID)Art. 64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74-5
Dec. 21 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms ofRacial Discrimination (CERD)
Art. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59Art. 1(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42Art. 2 . . . . . . 23-4, 26, 30, 32-3, 37-8, 40, 42-4, 48-50, 59-60Art. 2(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-1, 47-8, 173-5Art. 2(1)(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 68-70Art. 2(1)(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 68-70Art. 2(1)(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 69-70Art. 2(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69-70Art. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 20-1, 47-8, 68-9Art. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 68-9Art. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 20-1, 23-4, 26, 30, 32-3, 37, 40, 42-4,
47-8, 68-9Art. 5(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54Art. 5(d)(i) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54Art. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17, 20-1, 47-8, 68-9Art. 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40, 62, 72-4, 114, 150Art. 11(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274Art. 11(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274Arts. 11-13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93-4, 136-7, 177Arts. 11-16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72-5Art. 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73-4, 114Art. 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74, 150Art. 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Art. 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73-4Art. 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34, 40-1, 44-7, 58-9, 71-112, 135-225,
262-7, 272-88, 299-309, 317-21
1966Dec. 16 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Art. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 552-4
1969May 23 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) . . . . . . . 547
Art. 31(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . 113-20, 140-1, 177-9, 267-71, 273-4Art. 31(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 583Art. 31(3)(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 583-4, 594-5
TABLE OF TREATIES xxix
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information
Art. 31(3)(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 584-5Art. 32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140, 257
Nov. 22 American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR)Art. 62(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268-9Art. 62(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268-9
1979Dec. 18 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW)Art. 29(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60-2, 118-19
1986Mar. 21 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and
International Organizations or between InternationalOrganizationsArt. 31(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267, 270
1996Mar. 5 Council of Europe General Agreement on Privileges and
Immunities, Sixth ProtocolArts. 1-6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 696-7
1998July 17 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Art. 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388-9
Nov. 1 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms (1950) as amended by Protocol 11,effective as of 1 November 1998 (ECHR) . . . . . 349-50, 625-32,
687Art. 1 . . . . . . . . . . .505, 507-10, 542-3, 563-73, 682, 694, 727Art. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457, 493, 505, 510-11, 516, 530, 552-4,
560-2, 574-5, 584-5, 606-7Art. 3 . . . . . . . . 339-41, 343-5, 352-3, 362, 364, 385, 410-17,
421, 434-7, 457, 493, 495-6, 505, 530,552-4, 560-2
Art. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 339-41, 352-3, 362, 364, 385, 493, 496-7,505, 530, 552-4, 575-6, 584-6
Art. 5(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407-10, 414-17, 421-9, 552-4,562-3, 573-88, 637
Art. 5(1)(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530Art. 5(1)(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562-3, 574-5, 581-2Art. 5(1)(f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408-9, 425Art. 5(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 530, 562-3, 573-88
xxx TABLE OF TREATIES
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-05895-8 - International Law Reports: Volume 161Edited by Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Sir Christopher Greenwood and Karen LeeFrontmatterMore information