International Perspectives onInternational Perspectives onInternational Perspectives on International Perspectives on NAMANAMA

Peter A Minang

Moving the audience to actGlobal Coordinator

ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins at the World Agroforestry Centre

• Indonesia is world leader in NAMA approach / REDD+ (Commitment and now moving towards concrete)

• World is looking and hopes to learn from IndonesiaIndonesia

C / C hCancun / Copenhagen

• Should be seen and interpreted as a whole

• 1b(ii) NAMA• 1b (iii) Drivers of REDD+ / LULUCF• 1b (iii) Drivers of REDD+ / LULUCF• 1b (iv) Sectoral approaches (Agriculture

etc)etc)

S l t i f ll iSeveral countries following

• Several countries have made NAMA submissions based on COP 15- SEVERAL COMESA countries

• Brazil has done a Low C emission study

• Tanzania s moving towards a more district l l l i f CClevel planning for CC

Reduced Emissions from All Reduced Emissions from All Land Use Land Use -- REALUREALU

• Current forest definition within UNFCCC is problematic

• Drivers of deforestation not adequately addressed q ywithin REDD+ this far

• Current REDD+ construction ignores highCurrent REDD+ construction ignores high potential emissions reduction and sequestration in landscapesp

• Cancun agreement on REDD indicates total accounting within IPCC guidelinesg g

• A third of Indonesia’s forest• A third of Indonesia s forest emissions (total of 0.6 Gt C/yr) occur outside institutionally defined forest and is not accounted for under the current REDD+ policyp y

• The famous E. Usambaras forest in Tanzania 8.8 Mt C

itt d b t 1992 demitted between 1992 and 2006 but no deforestation occurred according to definition

Complex and variable landscapes the realityComplex and variable landscapes- the reality

Terimakasi / THANK YOUTerimakasi / THANK YOU

b iwww.asb.cgiar.org