Upload
lisa-summers
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE
2013 – 2016 Intersessional Programme Design Process
CEESP Steering Committee
January 2011
2
The intersessional programme
• Regulation 2: … “IUCN shall pursue its objectives through an integrated programme of activities, formulated, coordinated and implemented by the Members and components of IUCN ”
– Programme is mandated in out statutes and regulations– It is a union-wide designed and implemented programme
• Statute 20e:… [The functions of the World Congress shall be inter alia..].... “to consider and approve the programme and financial plan for the period until the next ordinary session of the World Congress”
– The mandate to implement the content of any specific intersessional programme of work can only come from the Members
3
Trends in intersessional programming (ISP)• Before WCC 2 (Amman) ISP:
– was loose and unstructured – de facto several programming frameworks.
– lacked synergies between IUCN components– 1998 / 1999 crisis led to first focused effort for a more structured
approach
• By WCC 3 (Bangkok) – agreed to operate under a “one programme ” framework– although progress 2005 – 2008 saw increasing donor critique that
IUCN was unable to demonstrate results and no clear demonstration of conservation interventions that improved human-wellbeing
• By WCC 4 (Barcelona)– shift to results-based programming– greater emphasis on adhering to value proposition– significantly sharper programme focus – re-organised programme structure
4
IUCN’s Value Proposition
Credible, trusted knowledge
Partnerships for action
Global to local / Local to global reach
Standards and practices
Derived from our unique structure and characteristics
5
6
Focal point for:CEESPCEM
Focal point for:SSCWCPA
Focal point for:CEL
Focal point for:CEC
Responsible for Responsible for Responsible for Responsible for
• Biodiversity •Climate Change •Energy •Global prog & policy
•Human well-being •Green Economy
7
Development of the IUCN Programme 2013-16
8
Preparation of 2013-16 component plans
• Each component of IUCN prepares a component programme plan, following the same basic rules:
– The document must contain a clear situation analysis (diagnosis) and justification for the results which are proposed;
– The proposed results should align with the Global Programme Areas and Results;
– The results must actually be results-based, indicating a clear change in policy, governance or behaviour in an intended audience (policy platform, government, person or organization);
– The results must specify targets and indicators of success.
9
Identifying means to achieve ends
• The means (or sub-results) shows how the result will be achieved.• In IUCN’s case, this is a combination of different aspects of the
value proposition and other strategies commonly used:– Trusted knowledge, but also what kind of knowledge, packaged in
what way?– Convening and partnerships: who can IUCN bring together,
particularly those who would not normally convene?– Global to local to global reach: how can IUCN leverage its reach, its
experience outside of this region, to bring to bear on the issue?– Standards and practices: deployment of tied and tested tools and
approaches
• Also – Empowerment and capacity building
10
Indicators of success
• A well formed result will immediately suggest an indicator• Indicators should be:
– S - specific– M - measurable– A – achievable and appropriate– R – realistic and reliable– T – time-bound
• IUCN often focuses results on policy changes, so it is important to identify indicators that capture:
– The qualitative change in the policy that IUCN wants – e.g. Does it refer to IUCN positions or advice regarding biodiversity conservation?
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE
Leverage the existing network model for IUCN’s thematic work
Co-ordinator
Core Group
Implementing Networks
Gender
REDD
Capacity Building (CEC)
Climate Change Core Group• 8 people: Commissions,
Council, Regional and HQ Secretariat,
• Function:- Overall advice & quality assurance on programme alignment and delivery
Implementation Networks • Vehicle for delivery of
thematic (sub)-results, e.g. REDD, EbA, Policy, Gender, Social Safeguards
• Designed to implement the one programme across Commissions, National Committees, Secretariat
12
Timelines and deliverables
– A CEESP representative attends programme writing week (24th Jan)– Make sure that CEESP successes are recognised and reported in the
2009 – 2010 IUCN programme report– Map ongoing activities in CEESP and identify institutional partners
with similar needs / priorities in other commissions / secretariat regions and global thematics
– Identify list of 6 to 10 candidate results justified by alignment with global results (2013 – 2016) – optimise synergies where possible.
– Draft of the CEESP 2013-16 component Programme is available for discussion by April
– Use opportunity of the Regional Conservation Forum to reinforce mapping process and result identification process
– Finalise the CEESP “2013 – 2016” component programme by October
13
Preparation of the CEESP Programme Plan2013-16