1
MEDIA REVIEWS Clinical Evidence Issue 1 edited by Fiona Godlee. BMJ Publishing Group, London, 2000, 598 pages, £45Æ00, ISBN 0 727 91364 6. Purporting to be a compendium of the best available evidence for effective heath care this new book is a significant breakthrough on the clinical effectiveness front. The presentation is reminiscent of the British National Formulary and it is intended to update the book twice yearly. It will be interesting to see if the book grows as the years pass or if old information is replaced by new or if subsequent volumes intro- duce entirely new fields. Between the introduction to the book and the main material there is an excellent glossary of terms used in clinical effectiveness almost worth the price of the book on its own. The introduction explains how the topics for the book were selected and how the evidence was gathered. Thereafter the book is divided into chapters on each of the following: infectious diseases, endo- crine disorders, mental health, neurolog- ical disorders, ear, nose and throat, respiratory diseases, digestive system, skin, wounds, musculoskeletal diseases, gynaecology, urology, sexual health, breast disorders, child health and cardiovascular diseases. Each section contains within it a series of topics which read like mini systematic reviews of the literature which is exactly what they are. Naturally, the book is mainly of medical interest but the section on wounds, edited by Nicky Cullum, is of direct relevance to nursing. I have been interested in pressure sore research for 20 years and it is sad to see how little of the literature, in this area of prolific publication, is actually any use for systematic reviews. Nevertheless, the place of hydrocolloid dressings, in pres- sure sore treatment seems to be indisput- able. This book will undoubtedly build up over the years into a very valuable collec- tion and it will be of great interest to see how new evidence is incorporated. Roger Watson Media Reviews Editor Internet Resources for Nurses edited by Joyce Fitzpatrick and Kristen Montgomery. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2000, 250 pages, $29Æ75, ISBN 0 826 11371 0. Possibly the first of its kind, this is an interesting resource book for nurses students, clinicians, researchers and managers. I suppose it could be asked why such a book would be needed given the ease with which world wide web (WWW) pages can be found across the globe using search engines or even just ‘Jeeves’ (www.ask.co.uk). Once there, the user will soon be able to form an opinion of the page and its utility. However, there are just so many WWW pages these days that some guidance is necessary and there is still some ‘technophobia’ around in nursing. The book is North American but covers European and, specifically, United Kingdom WWW sites. The book is divided into three parts: Clinical Web Sites, Profes- sional Web Sites and Evaluating Informa- tion. The last part comprises just one chapter which does not actually evaluate any WWW sites. The criteria used for evaluating the WWW sites reviewed are: authority/ source, purpose/objectivity, content, currency and design. The editors derived these criteria after a systematic review of WWW sites and this alone is a very useful addition to method in this area. The best are included which the editors think will be useful to nurses and they are reviewed by a wide variety of individuals. I tried to test the veracity of the claims made about some sites – many of which are familiar to most academics – and found them to be accurate. There was high praise for the Royal College of Nurses in the United Kingdom’s research pages but I agree with the reviewer that they can seem a bit disjointed. My copy of this book will go straight to our library for the use of our students but I can well imagine consulting it again myself in the future. Roger Watson Media Reviews Editor Reflective Practice: a Guide for Nurses and Midwives edited by Beverley J. Taylor. Open University Press, Buckingham, 2000, 254 pages, £15Æ99, ISBN 0 335 20689 1. Reflective practice is now widely accepted as a means of improving clinical practice. Reflective practice aims to enhance patient care through the professional development and growing expertise of practitioners. The author presents an overview of reflec- tive practice by giving guidelines of how reflection can assist clinical practice for nurses and midwives. Because the book is written from a practice perspective, the text is focused directly on clinical nurses and midwives. The material is divided appropriately into 11 sections. Section 1 looks at the nature of reflection. The author defines the term and explores sources of reflection. Section 2 discusses the nature of nursing and midwifery, focuses on work settings and constraints. Section 3 considers the role of reflective practice to nurses/mid- wives and gives essentials for novices for getting ready to reflect. Section 4 illus- trates some practical examples based on clinical practitioners’ real stories (two midwives and one nurse). The value of reflection to clinical practice and to nurses/midwives is highlighted in section 5. Section 6 covers briefly the three types of reflection use in clinical practice. In the next three sections (7, 8 and 9), the author goes on and analyses the three types of reflection (technical, practical and eman- cipatory) separately, and presents prac- tical examples for each type of reflection. Section 10 presents three real stories of clinical practitioners, followed by critical comments from the author. Finally, section 11 discusses maintaining nurses/ midwives reflective practitioner’s menta- lity and the value of finding support systems to keep them on track. The author writes in a lucid style. The book is written clearly and provides an interesting read. Each section is well refer- enced, directing the reader to other rele- vant literature. The sections are well Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(6), 1579–1582 Ó 2000 Blackwell Science Ltd 1579

Internet Resources for Nurses edited by Joyce Fitzpatrick and Kristen Montgomery. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2000, 250 pages, $29·75, ISBN 0 826 11371 0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Internet Resources for Nurses edited by Joyce Fitzpatrick and Kristen Montgomery. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2000, 250 pages, $29·75, ISBN 0 826 11371 0

MEDIA REVIEWS

Clinical Evidence Issue 1 edited by Fiona

Godlee. BMJ Publishing Group, London,

2000,598pages,£45á00, ISBN0727913646.

Purporting to be a compendium of the best

available evidence for effective heath care

this new book is a signi®cant breakthrough

on the clinical effectiveness front. The

presentation is reminiscent of the British

National Formulary and it is intended to

update the book twice yearly. It will be

interesting to see if the book grows as the

years pass or if old information is replaced

by new or if subsequent volumes intro-

duce entirely new ®elds. Between the

introduction to the book and the main

material there is an excellent glossary of

terms used in clinical effectiveness ±

almost worth the price of the book on its

own. The introduction explains how the

topics for the book were selected and how

the evidence was gathered. Thereafter the

book is divided into chapters on each of

the following: infectious diseases, endo-

crine disorders, mental health, neurolog-

ical disorders, ear, nose and throat,

respiratory diseases, digestive system,

skin, wounds, musculoskeletal diseases,

gynaecology, urology, sexual health, breast

disorders, child health and cardiovascular

diseases. Each section contains within it a

series of topics which read like mini

systematic reviews of the literature ±

which is exactly what they are.

Naturally, the book is mainly of medical

interest but the section on wounds, edited

by Nicky Cullum, is of direct relevance to

nursing. I have been interested in pressure

sore research for 20 years and it is sad to

see how little of the literature, in this area

of proli®c publication, is actually any use

for systematic reviews. Nevertheless, the

place of hydrocolloid dressings, in pres-

sure sore treatment seems to be indisput-

able. This book will undoubtedly build up

over the years into a very valuable collec-

tion and it will be of great interest to see

how new evidence is incorporated.

Roger Watson

Media Reviews Editor

Internet Resources for Nurses edited by

Joyce Fitzpatrick and Kristen Montgomery.

Springer Publishing Company, New York,

2000,250pages,$29á75, ISBN0826113710.

Possibly the ®rst of its kind, this is an

interesting resource book for nurses ±

students, clinicians, researchers and

managers. I suppose it could be asked

why such a book would be needed given

the ease with which world wide web

(WWW) pages can be found across the

globe using search engines or even just

`Jeeves' (www.ask.co.uk). Once there, the

user will soon be able to form an opinion

of the page and its utility. However, there

are just so many WWW pages these days

that some guidance is necessary and there

is still some `technophobia' around in

nursing. The book is North American but

covers European and, speci®cally, United

Kingdom WWW sites. The book is divided

into three parts: Clinical Web Sites, Profes-

sional Web Sites and Evaluating Informa-

tion. The last part comprises just one

chapter which does not actually evaluate

any WWW sites.

The criteria used for evaluating the

WWW sites reviewed are: authority/

source, purpose/objectivity, content,

currency and design. The editors derived

these criteria after a systematic review of

WWW sites and this alone is a very useful

addition to method in this area. The best

are included which the editors think will

be useful to nurses and they are reviewed

by a wide variety of individuals. I tried to

test the veracity of the claims made about

some sites ± many of which are familiar to

most academics ± and found them to be

accurate. There was high praise for the

Royal College of Nurses in the United

Kingdom's research pages but I agree with

the reviewer that they can seem a bit

disjointed. My copy of this book will go

straight to our library for the use of our

students but I can well imagine consulting

it again myself in the future.

Roger Watson

Media Reviews Editor

Re¯ective Practice: a Guide for Nurses and

Midwives edited by Beverley J. Taylor.

Open University Press, Buckingham, 2000,

254 pages, £15á99, ISBN 0 335 20689 1.

Re¯ective practice is now widely accepted

as a means of improving clinical practice.

Re¯ective practice aims to enhance patient

care through the professional development

and growing expertise of practitioners.

The author presents an overview of re¯ec-

tive practice by giving guidelines of how

re¯ection can assist clinical practice for

nurses and midwives. Because the book is

written from a practice perspective, the

text is focused directly on clinical nurses

and midwives.

The material is divided appropriately

into 11 sections. Section 1 looks at the

nature of re¯ection. The author de®nes the

term and explores sources of re¯ection.

Section 2 discusses the nature of nursing

and midwifery, focuses on work settings

and constraints. Section 3 considers the

role of re¯ective practice to nurses/mid-

wives and gives essentials for novices for

getting ready to re¯ect. Section 4 illus-

trates some practical examples based on

clinical practitioners' real stories (two

midwives and one nurse). The value of

re¯ection to clinical practice and to

nurses/midwives is highlighted in section

5. Section 6 covers brie¯y the three types

of re¯ection use in clinical practice. In the

next three sections (7, 8 and 9), the author

goes on and analyses the three types of

re¯ection (technical, practical and eman-

cipatory) separately, and presents prac-

tical examples for each type of re¯ection.

Section 10 presents three real stories of

clinical practitioners, followed by critical

comments from the author. Finally,

section 11 discusses maintaining nurses/

midwives re¯ective practitioner's menta-

lity and the value of ®nding support

systems to keep them on track.

The author writes in a lucid style. The

book is written clearly and provides an

interesting read. Each section is well refer-

enced, directing the reader to other rele-

vant literature. The sections are well

Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(6), 1579±1582

Ó 2000 Blackwell Science Ltd 1579