Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Interpreting theGI Pathogen Plus Profile
(GPP) ReportBernadette M. Mandes Wildemore, MD
Medical and Laboratory Director
DRG Laboratory
All tests were developed and their performance characteristics determined by DRG Laboratory
Diagnosis and treatment are the responsibility of the ordering physician
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
All testing at DRG is performed via molecular methods
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Enzyme Linked Immuno-sorbent Assay (ELISA)
Sections of the GPP Report
Bacteria and Toxins by PCR
Antibiotic Resistance by PCR
GI Health Markers
Parasites by PCR
Fungi by PCR
Each of the analytes are listed by name on the left of the report
The quantitative value is listed for each analyte in the column labeled
‘Quantitation’
The result is listed for each analyte in the column labeled ‘Result’
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
It is imperative that the ordering clinician work in concert with the
laboratory values as provided by DRG. As our laboratorians do not
actually SEE the patient, it is critical for the treating physician to be
familiar and comfortable with the lab values we provide. Consultation
with our laboratory medicine specialists are always available if
questions arise
Result interpretation for Bacteria and Toxins section of GPP
For most of the values in the ‘Bacteria and Toxins by PCR’ section of the
report, DRG has determined the ‘cut-off’ or ‘nominal’ value as ≥ to 350
In other words, 350 is where the value turns from negative to positive
The exceptions include the Helicobacter pylori (HP) markers and the HP
stool antigen (please see later slides)
Interpreting the GPP ‘line by line’
First, let’s start with the Bacteria and Toxins by PCR section
Interpreting the GPP
Clostridium difficile (toxins A and B)
Bacterium that can cause significant diarrhea and colitis (≥3 loose stools in 24 hours)
Complaints usually associated with current or recent antibiotic therapy
Usually accompany treatment with
Fluoroquinolone
Clindamycin
Cephalosporin
Penicillin
BUT can be tied to any antibiotic use
Particularly of concern in very young or very old, or immunocompromised patients
Interpreting the GPP
C. difficile is a critical infection to identify and treat aggressively (i.e., antibiotics)
Suggested treatment protocol is the responsibility of the ordering clinician; however, treatment
generally includes
Stop ALL non essential antibiotics
Confirm that C. difficile toxin is present via confirmatory method (DRG assay works for this)
AVOID empiric therapy until diagnosis is confirmed
Treat
Interpreting the GPP
Campylobacter
Campylobacter enteritis due to C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari are clinically indistinguishable
Complaints include belly pain, cramping, and diarrhea
Treatment is generally supportive (except for immunocompromised patients)
Interpreting the GPP
Escherichia coli (E. coli) 0:157
While E. coli may be considered normal flora in some humans, significant
pathogenic strains exist
Pathogenic E. coli strains are categorized into pathotypes
Six pathotypes are associated with diarrhea and collectively are referred to as
diarrheagenic E. coli.
Interpreting the GPP
Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli types
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC).
Often times, this is the specific pathotype involved in the more noteworthy outbreaks
The Shiga toxin producing E. coli strains include two major strains: Stx1 and Stx2
Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC)
Suggested treatment protocol is the responsibility of the ordering clinician; however, treatment generally includes
Supportive therapy (hydration)
Antibiotics should be avoided
Antibiotics and Imodium® may increase the risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a potentially fatal
complication
Interpreting the Helicobacter pylori (HP) values on the GPP
The HP values are one of the exceptions to the ≥ 350 rule for many of the
analytes. For these, the cut off values are below:
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) ≥ 51.75
cagA ≥ 199.5
vacA ≥ 181.5
iceA ≥ 350.5
oipA ≥ 1500
Interpreting the GPP report
What are the virulence factors (VF) as reported on the GPP?
These factors give additional information to the treating physician regarding the potential for the
development of gastric cancer (GC)
The development of GC involves the interplay among three important factors
The agent (generally, H. pylori) and its pathogenicity
Host (patient) characteristics
Environment
Additional information regarding the individual VF is available on our website for the DRG HP panel
(HPP) report
Interpreting the GPP report The HP stool antigen value is the other analyte that differs from the ≥ 350
rule. The cut off value for the stool antigen is 3 ng/mL
H. pylori stool antigen ¹ : Negative or positive
The ‘superscript one’ refers to the area of the report that reads:
“Please note: The Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) value can remain positive even in
the absence of an active infection. The H. pylori stool antigen functions to
determine if the infection is active or current; therefore, favoring treatment. The
cut off value for HP stool antigen is 3ng/mL”
Critical numbers in the Bacteria and Toxins by PCR section of GPP Report
Below are key values that should alert the clinician to a significant issue
Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) toxin A and/or toxin B
C. difficile is a potentially noteworthy infection that generally requires antibiotic treatment
If symptoms warrant, ALL non-essential antibiotics should be stopped
Treat case with appropriate antibiotic
H. pylori stool antigen
A positive value indicates an active or current infection, and usually suggests treatment
This is even more critical when the patient is positive for one or more of the virulent factors
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Reliable methods to determine eradication of HP infection
Noninvasive testing options for H. pylori include serology, urea breath
testing (UBT), and stool antigen
Serologic testing has poor sensitivity and specificity values
The sensitivities and specificities of UBT and stool antigen are essentially equivalent
However, UBT requires the patient make significant dietary and medical changes
Interpreting the GPP report
Salmonella spp.
Significant diarrheal illness
Most patients develop diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps within 12 and 72 hours after
infection
Usually self-limited, but may be of special concern for immunocompromised patients
Severe illness may require hospitalization for blood borne illness
Interpreting the GPP report
Shigella spp.
Significant diarrheal illness
Symptoms include diarrhea (sometimes bloody), fever, abdominal pain, and tenesmus
Symptoms usually self limited except in immunocompromised
Bismuth subsalicylate (e.g., Pepto-Bismol®) may be helpful
Antibiotics should be avoided
If any of the bacteria or toxins, or stool antigen are determined positive by
DRG, AND the antibiotic resistance box is checked on the TRF, you will see the
report below
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Each of the values listed in the Antibiotic Resistance by PCR section of the
report are commonly used antibiotics for the treatment of H. pylori
However, the antibiotics are not specific for H. pylori
The result will be either sensitive or resistant
Resistant values indicate antibiotics that likely won’t work for this patient
It is important to note that the results in this section are not organism specific;
rather, they are patient specific
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Resistance traits are genetically encoded, so at DRG we test for the specific genes
that confer antibiotic resistance (AR)
Although nucleic acid-based detections systems are generally rapid and sensitive,
it is important to remember that the presence of a resistance gene does not
necessarily equate to treatment failure
Resistance is an ever evolving field as bacteria continue to evolve with the
transfer of resistance one to another
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Beta lactam antibiotics target the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). The
beta-lactam ring portion of this group of antibiotics binds to these different
PBPs, rendering them unable to perform their role in cell wall synthesis
This then leads to death of the bacterial cell due to osmotic instability or
autolysis
Specific examples include penicillin, carbapenam, and cephalosporin
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Nitroimidazole antibiotics have been used to combat anaerobic bacterial and
parasitic infections
The most common example is metronidazole (Flagyl®).
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Fluoroquinolones belong to a family of broad spectrum, systemic antibacterial
agents
Fluoroquinolones are active against a wide range of aerobic gram-positive and
gram-negative organisms
Examples include ciprofloxacin (Cipro®) and lexofloxacin (Levaquin®).
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Tetracycline is generally used in the treatment of infections of the urinary
tract, respiratory tract, and the intestines
The use of tetracycline is becoming more and more limited due to widespread
development of resistance in the causative organisms
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Genetic resistance is associated with presence of the nitroimidazole
resistance genes nimA-H and nimJ
The affected drugs include metronidazol, tinidazol, and ornidazol
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Vancomycin is indicated for the treatment of serious, life -threatening
infections by gram-positive bacteria unresponsive to other antibiotics
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Next, let’s move on to the GI Health Markers section of the GPP report
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Anti-Gliadin IgA
This first analyte is to determine if a patient has a sensitivity to gluten
This assay does NOT confirm celiac disease, as that is only possible through an invasive small
intestinal biopsy
The anti-gliadin assay is a superlative non invasive alternative to detect the antibodies
commonly found in patients that have celiac disease
Our assay detects circulating IgA antibodies to gliadin, an antibody found in ~80% of patients
with celiac disease
It is directed against the alpha/beta and gamma (α,β,γ) gliadins, and may also found in a number
of patients who are not enteropathic
Patients with values over 100 U/L should be considered for a gluten free diet to relieve
GI symptoms such as bloating, diarrhea, constipation, and irritable bowel
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Calprotectin and Lactoferrin
Elevated levels of calprotectin and lactoferrin indicate that
neutrophils (PMNs) have migrated in to the lumen of the intestine
These PMNs are markers of inflammation within the gut
High calprotectin and lactoferrin levels are indicative of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, the
assay does not differentiate ulcerated colitis from Crohn disease
This test may be useful for monitoring disease activity
The test is also positive in patients with bacterial infection
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Fecal fat
Values over 400 are indicative of fat malabsorption syndromes that lead to steatorrhea
Disorders of exocrine pancreatic function
Celiac disease
Short bowel syndrome (in which much of the small intestine has had to be surgically removed and
the remaining portion cannot completely absorb all of the fat)
Small bowel bacterial overgrowth syndrome (SIBO)
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Fecal occult blood (FOBT)
This is the only non quantitative assay we perform at DRG Laboratory
This assay looks for microscopic (occult) blood in the stool secondary to upper or
lower intestinal bleeding; however, false positives are possible
The value with be negative or positive
A positive value should prompt a search for the cause of the bleeding
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
sIgA 1 and sIgA 2
These markers are indicative of secretory IgA
This is the antibody that lines the interior of the intestines
Cut off value → 1000; however much higher values are possible
Anything that comes in to contact with the mucosa of the gut
may be seen as a foreigner by the immune system
sIgA 1 > sIgA 2 → IBD
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Next, let’s move to the Parasites by PCR section of the GPP report
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Blastocystis hominis
Gastrointestinal parasite found in ~23% of US population (in 2000)
Four commonly described forms are the vacuolar, granular, amoeboid, and cyst forms
Fecal oral transmission within humans has only been identified for the cyst form
Symptoms include diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, bloating, excessive gas, and anal
itching
May also be associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
Suggested treatment includes nitazoxanide
Entamoeba histolytica
This parasite may infect up to 10% of the world’s population
Symptoms can include fulminating dysentery, bloody diarrhea, weight loss, fatigue,
abdominal pain, and amoeboma
Cysts survive outside the host in water, in soils, and on foods
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Giardia spp.
Intestinal parasite of infected humans
Infection occurs by ingesting or coming into contact with contaminated food, soil, or
water (seasonal infection from fresh water lakes is common)
Symptoms include violent diarrhea, excess gas, stomach or abdominal cramps, upset
stomach, and nausea
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Trichomonas spp.
Intestinal parasite of infected humans
The trichomonad species include T. vaginalis, T. tenax, T. hominis
T. hominis is also known as Pentatrichomonas hominis
This third organism inhabits the intestinal tract in the area of the cecum (portion of the intestines
between the small and large bowel)
Diagnosis of this organism as ‘pathogenic’ is currently controversial, but is believed to be a marker
for other, clearly pathogenic organisms in the stool
Furthermore, this organism is also believed to be associated with diarrhea, in addition to being
found in some liver abscesses
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Please keep in mind that values in the range of 350-900 MFI (particularly among
the parasites) are ‘molecularly positive,’ but may not be clinically significant
Treatment based on these results is recommended only if clinical symptoms and
appropriate assessment of the patient warrant
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Lastly, let’s move to the Fungi by PCR section of the report
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
Candida spp.
This yeast is an opportunistic infection commonly found on skin
Gastrointestinal infection with candida species is usually a symptom of dysbiosis
Return to a healthy gut microbiome is most often suggested
Candida infection also accompanies overzealous use of antibiotics or antacids,
alcohol overuse, or poor diet
Interpreting the DRG GPP report
The results indicated on this report represent organisms that may be commensal
and normally found in a given patient, particularly given his or her environmental
exposures. A positive value does not necessarily indicate the need of treatment.
Values given here should always be interpreted in concert with the greater
clinical picture for an individual patient. Any laboratory value should never be
taken in isolation without careful clinical judgement.
DRG Laboratory
References
Kostic, Aleksandar D; Dirk Gevers, Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu, Monia Michaud, Fujiko Duke, Ashlee M Earl, Akinyemi I Ojesina, Joonil Jung, Adam J Bass, Josep Tabernero, José Baselga, Chen Liu, Ramesh A Shivdasani, Shuji Ogino, Bruce W Birren, Curtis Huttenhower, Wendy S Garrett, Matthew Meyerson (2012-02). "Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma". Genome Research 22 (2): 292–298.
Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Kimata I; et al. (January 2004). "Polymerase chain reaction-based genotype classification among human Blastocystis hominis populations isolated from differrentcountries". Parasitol. Res. 92 (1): 22–9.
Blastocystis hominis infection. Diseases and Infections. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Last accessed October 7, 2015.
Bonner A, et. al. The Nonplanar Secretory IgA2 and Near Planar Secretory IgA1 Solution Structures Rationalize Their DifferentMucosal Immune Responses. J Biol Chem. 2009 Feb 20; 284(8): 5077–5087.
Entamoeba histolytica Infection. General Information. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Last accessed October 7, 2015
Giardia infection (giardiasis). Diseases and Infections. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Last accessed October 7, 2015.
Glocker E. The Need for Resistance Surveillance and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori. Digestion. 2015 Sep 16;92(3):173-174.
Haley K, Gaddy J. Metalloregulation of Helicobacter pylori physiology and pathogenesis. Front Microbiol. 2015 Sep 2;6:911. eCollection 2015.
Kane SV, Sandborn WJ, Rufo PA, Zholudev A, Boone J, Lyerly D, Camilleri M, Hanauer SB. Fecal lactoferrin is a sensitive and specific marker in identifying intestinal inflammation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;98(6):1309-14.
Navidad J. Evaluation of Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen analyte-specific reagents for high-throughput, simultaneous detection of bacteria, viruses, and parasites of clinical and public health importance. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):3018-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00896-13. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
Sayehmiri F. Prevalence of cagA and vacA among Helicobacter pylori-infected patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Jul 30;9(7):686-96.
Warner RH, Stevens FM, McCarthy CF. Salivary SIgA and SIgA 1 in coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease and controls. Ir J Med Sci. 1999 Jan-Mar;168(1):33-5.
Hemmatinezhad, B. et. al. (2016) VacA, cagA, iceA and oipA genotypes status and antimicrobial resistance properties of Helicobacter pylori isolated from various types of ready to eat foods. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016 Jan 20;15(1):2.
Thank you!