Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
interRAI and qualityMichele McCreadie, General Manager, interRAI Services
Marg Milne, Team Leader South, interRAI Services
Jacqueline Joseph, Team Leader North, interRAI Services
Quality of data:The interRAI data quality projectMichele McCreadie, General Manager interRAI Services
Good data?
D
interRAI data quality projectTo evidence that high data quality is achieved and maintained to
increase confidence in interRAI data
4
Commissioned by interRAI NZ Governance Board
Began March 2018
Use the interRAI data warehouse to evidence the quality of the data
Implement a process for quality review and improvement
interRAI data collection process
Rigorous data collection process currently in place, including:
• Assessment instruments well tested
internationally
• Assessors are qualified health
professionals
• Ongoing quality reviews of completed
assessments
• Single national software platform –
consistent and standardised.
5
interRAI data quality measures
Trends in population characteristics
Trends in clinical characteristics
Trends in convergent validity
6
LTCF Trends in population characteristics
Year Female %
Married %
Under 65
%Over 85
%Dementia
%Heart failure
%
2015-16 66% 25% 4% 54% 18% 8%
2016-17 66% 24% 4% 54% 18% 8%
2017-18 65% 25% 4% 54% 18% 8%
7
LTCF Trends in clinical characteristics
YearCognitive
Performance Scale 3+ %
Depression Rating Scale 3+
%
Activities of Daily Living
Hierarchy 3+ %
2015-16 45% 20% 44%
2016-17 44% 21% 44%
2017-18 44% 21% 43%
LTCF Trends in convergent validity
YearADLH
and CPSPain
and DRSCHESS
and CPSPain
and CPS
2015-16 0.55 0.16 0.13 -0.14
2016-17 0.55 0.16 0.12 -0.15
2017-18 0.54 0.16 0.12 -0.15
9
Data quality issuesD
ata
valid
ity
•Invalid National Health Index number
Dat
a co
mp
lete
nes
s
•Missing height and weight information
10
Invalid National Health Index• Unique
identifier assigned to every person who uses health and disability support services in New Zealand
• Specific format: AAA0000
11
• Any NHI number that does not fit the correct format or that has an incorrectcheck digit is referred to as invalid
• 350 invalid NHIs ≈ 680 assessments discovered in interRAI data warehouse (error rate = 0.2%)
Invalid NHIs by assessment type over time
12
0
50
100
150
200
250
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Contact assessment Home Care assessment LTCF assessment
Missing height and weight information
Used to monitor:
• nutrition
• hydration status
• weight stability over time.
•Affects interRAI outcome measures:
• Undernutrition Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP)
• Quality Indicator (QI) – prevalence of unexplained weight loss
•Not measured because of clinical rationale
13
Missing height and weight information
14
0 00
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0
% o
f as
sess
men
ts
#REF! #REF!
15
Conclusions
•Overall high quality
• Stable trends over time and convergent validity between outcome variables
• Important to continuously monitor and improve data quality
• Important to evidence data quality
interRAI Quality indicatorsMarg Milne, Team Leader South
Quality indicators
17
Show patterns in service delivery
Cover a large number of aspects of service delivery
Are derived from the data in interRAI assessments
Uses of interRAI Quality Indicators
18
Better understand service quality
Identify areas where you are
doing well
Identify opportunities to improve quality
Track quality of care over time
Evaluate the impact of service
improvement exercises
Evaluate the influence on policy
decisions
Reports
19
National reports and education materials at
www.interrai.co.nz/data-and-reporting/quality-indicators
Facility reportsAll facilities may expect an individualised Quality
Indicator report in October
We will contact you by email when this is available
The report is available through Connex
DHBs will not have access to your individual Quality Indicator reports
20
Report charts
Each report contains five charts, One for each level of care
All levels of care
Resthome Hospital DementiaPsycho-geriatric
21
Example
22
interRAI Quality Indicators• National• April to June 2018• Care level group: Resthome Care
X National (previous quarter)X National (current quarter)
Example
• Yellow triangle = my facilities current quarter’s score
• White triangle = my facility’s previous quarter’s score
• Green cross = the national average score
23
24
Understanding prevalence and incidence
Not all quality indicators will or should change in the same direction over time.
PrevalenceWe want to see:
A lower pattern of scores over time
Declined incidenceWe want to see:
A lower pattern of scores over time
Improved incidenceWe want to see:
A higher pattern of scores over time
Responding to reports• Quality indicators are developed in
ways to balance the findings
• No individual facility will be good or poor at everything
25
For example:Resident falls are reported at the same time as the facility’s use of restraints
Suggestions for responding to the report
Evaluate your performance compared to the reported
average and previous quarter
• Are trends in the right direction?
• Any investigation required for underlying factors that may have led to the results?
• Do others involved in care feel the report is consistent with their experience?
Use the results to inform your quality plan
• Is there an area/s to prioritise in your quality efforts?
• Do you need to develop strategies to changeyour practice patterns in the facility?
• Are their any targets to set for your performance improvement?
• Share with the care team the indicators that signal that you are excelling.
26
27
FuturePeriod of ‘surveillance’:
• Users will understand indicators.
• Providers will use this information to reflect on the care they provide.
• Positive New Zealand examples of care will be promoted.
• Positive news and case studies of quality care will be shared.
Over time (2019):
• Shift to risk adjustment system.
• Individuals with similar clinical features are compared.
Quality of life:interRAI Wellbeing measuresJacqueline Joseph, Team Leader North
‘older people live well, age well, and have a respectful end of life in age-friendly communities’
29
Healthy Ageing Strategy 2016
Key wellbeing measures
30
Physical and mental health status
Independence
Safety
Positive relationships
Responsibilities and directives
Health status – most commonly diagnosed disease
31
19%
23%
25%
26%
37%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Diabetes mellitus
Stroke/CVA
Depression
Coronary heart disease
Dementia other than Alzheimers
Long Term Care Facilities in %
Mental health – DepressionDepression clinical diagnosis vs. Depression Rating Scale (DRS) by ethnicity
32
17%
22%
15%
10%
20%18% 21% 18%
14%
21%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Asian European Maori Pacific Peoples Other Ethnicity
% with Depression clinical diagnosis % Depression Rating Scale 3+
Independence – Activities of Daily Living (ADL) >3
33
European Māori Pacific Peoples Asian Other Ethnicity
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 6
34
Safety – Falls risk
<65 65-74 75-84 85+
Positive relationships – Social relationship CAP
35
No
rth
lan
d
Wai
tem
ata
Au
ckla
nd
Co
un
ties
Man
uka
u
Wai
kato
Lake
s
Bay
of
Ple
nty
Tair
awh
iti
Tara
nak
i
Haw
ke’s
Bay
Mid
Cen
tral
Wh
anga
nu
i
Cap
ital
an
d C
oas
t
Hu
tt V
alle
y
Wai
rara
pa
Nel
son
Mar
lbo
rou
gh
Wes
t C
oas
t
Can
terb
uy
Sou
th C
ante
rbu
ry
Sou
ther
n
Responsibilities and directives – EPOA
36
No
rth
lan
d
Wai
tem
ata
Au
ckla
nd
Co
un
ties
Man
uka
u
Wai
kato
Lake
s
Bay
of
Ple
nty
Tair
awh
iti
Tara
nak
i
Haw
ke’s
Bay
Mid
Cen
tral
Wh
anga
nu
i
Cap
ital
an
d C
oas
t
Hu
tt V
alle
y
Wai
rara
pa
Nel
son
Mar
lbo
rou
gh
Wes
t C
oas
t
Can
terb
uy
Sou
th C
ante
rbu
ry
Sou
ther
n
EPOA by care level
37
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Dementia Hospital care Other care Psycho-geriatriccare
Respite care Resthome care
No
Yes
www.interrai.co.nz