Upload
alison-cobb
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Interventional Registries
The Audit and Research Potential of the BCIS CCAD Registry
Peter F Ludman
NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO DECLARE
Audit: Background
• Clinical Governance– The systematic approach to maintaining and
improving the quality of patient care in a health system
• Recognisably high standards of care• Transparent responsibility and accountability
for those standards• A constant dynamic of improvement
Clinical Governance• Education and training
– continued professional development
• Clinical effectiveness– the appropriateness, efficacy, cost effectiveness and safety of different
therapies.
• Research and development– the application of new research findings into clinical practice and
guideline development.
• Openness– Poor practice can thrive if it occurs out of the scrutiny of peers, and
while openness is important, it must respect appropriate individual patient and practitioner confidentiality.
• Risk management– addressing and minimising risks to patients, physicians and
organisations.
• Clinical audit
Clinical Audit
• Greatest potential to assess quality of care
• Domains– Structure– Appropriateness– Process– Outcomes
SCTS
Aim:Harmonise datasetsDesign medical audit systemBased on principles of quality assuranceTo be used Nationally
BPEG
British Paediatric Cardiac Association
CCAD formed May 1996 DoH fundingPilot for 3 years
6 Specialist Groups
1999 onwards Funding viaNHS IA
Data Collection
• BCIS-CCAD dataset 5.5.6 (113 fields)
Spreadsheet csv file spec
CCAD Mechanism
Hospital 1
Hospital 2
Hospital 3
Hospital n
CCAD Server
encryption
Internetencryption
encryption
encryption
.
.
Central Cardiac Audit Database Domains
PCI MINAP Adult Surgery
Paedtrc
Surgery
Heart
Failure
EP
Pacing
ICD
Rehab Ambulance
audit
BCIS RCP SCTS BPCA BSH HRUK BACR / BHF
ASA
CCADNHS Central
Register
HeartValve registry
Central Cardiac Audit Database Domains
PCI MINAP Adult Surgery
Paedtrc
Surgery
Heart
Failure
EP
Pacing
ICD
Rehab Ambulance
audit
BCIS RCP SCTS BPCA BSH HRUK BACR / BHF
ASA
CCADNHS Central
Register
HeartValve registry
Procedure Specific AnalysisParticipation in CCAD
2009 data: Ludman
Total No. of Centres
Data to CCAD
Participation
England NHS 77 74 96%
Private 16 5 31%
Wales 3 3 100%
N Ireland 3 2 67%
Scotland NHS 7 6 86%
Private 1 0 0%
CCAD dataUK PCI data in CCAD as % of Reported Totals
0 50 100 150 200
LBH. London Bridge HospitalAEI. Royal Albert Edward InfirmaryRCH. Royal Cornwall HospitalRAD. John Radcliffe HospitalNHB. Royal Brompton HospitalERI. Royal infirmary of EdinburghWHC. Whipps Cross University HospitalWAL. Walsgrave HospitalAMG. Wycombe General HospitalSAN. Sandwell District General HospitalHHW. Wellington HospitalMPH. Taunton & SomersetLIN. Lincoln County HospitalLGI. Yorkshire Heart CentreWYT. Wythenshawe HospitalMRI. Manchester Royal InfirmaryBAS. Basildon HospitalBHH. Rochdale InfirmaryBHL. Liverpool Heart and Chest HospitalBOU. Royal Bournemouth GeneralCGH. Conquest HospitalCHN. Nottingham City HospitalDER. Derby Royal InfirmaryDGE. Eastbourne DGHFRM. Frimley Park HospitalGRL. Glenfield HospitalKGH. Kettering General HospitalKSX. Kent & Sussex HospitalNIN. Ninewells HospitalNTH. Northampton General HospitalQEB. Queen Elizabeth HospitalSCM. James Cook University HospitalSPH. St Peter's HospitalSTM. St Mary's HospitalUCL. University College HospitalVIC. Victoria HospitalWRC. Worcestershire Royal HospitalRDE. Royal Devon & Exeter HospitalLIS. Lister HospitalSTH. St Thomas' HospitalHH. Harefield HospitalBRD. Bradford Royal InfirmaryGJH. Golden Jubilee HospitalPAP. Papworth HospitalBHR. Royal Berkshire and Battle HospitalMAY. Mayday University HospitalPLY. Derriford HospitalWHH. William Harvey HospitalMOR. Morriston HospitalNHH. North Hampshire HospitalSTO. North Staffordshire HospitalWEX. Wexham Park HospitalUHW. University Hospital of WalesEBH. Birmingham Heartlands HospitalFRE. Freeman HospitalNGS. Northern General HospitalNOR. Norfolk & Norwich HospitalCHG. Cheltenham General HospitalCHH. Castle Hill HospitalTOR. Torbay HospitalDUD. City HospitalBRI. Bristol Royal InfirmaryHSC. Harley Street ClinicCLW. Glan Clwyd DGH TrustDVH. Darent Valley HospitalRSC. Royal Sussex County HospitalWDH. Dorset County HospitalWRG. Worthing HospitalWAT. Watford General HospitalSUN. Sunderland Royal HospitalFRY. Frenchay HospitalKCH. King's College HospitalPMS. The Great Western HospitalRFH. Royal Free HospitalNCR. New Cross HospitalSGH. Southampton General HospitalGEO. St George's HospitalHAM. Hammersmith HospitalRIA. Aberdeen Royal InfirmaryRVB. Royal Victoria HospitalBAL. Barts and the LondonQAP. Queen Alexandra HospitalNPH. Northwick Park HospitalCRG. Craigavon Area HospitalBAT. Royal United Hospital BathESU. East Surrey HospitalANT. St Anthony's HospitalPHB. BMI Priory HospitalAHM. BMI Alexandra HospitalBFT. Belfast City HospitalBMI. BMI Meriden HospitalCBS. BUPA Hospital SouthamptonCRO. Cromwell HospitalEAL. Ealing HospitalGWH. Queen Elizabeth Hospital,HAI. Hairmyres HospitalHBP. BUPA Hospital, Hull & East RidingIND. London Independent HospitalKMH. Kings Mill HospitalLEB. BUPA Hospital LeedsLNH. Leeds Nuffield HospitalMHO. Manor HospitalPHN. BMI Park HospitalRHH. Ross Hall HospitalYKC. Capio Yorkshire Clinic
2009 data: Ludman
As August 2010
CCAD dataUK PCI data in CCAD as % of Reported Totals
0 50 100 150 200
LBH. London Bridge HospitalAEI. Royal Albert Edward InfirmaryRCH. Royal Cornwall HospitalRAD. John Radcliffe HospitalNHB. Royal Brompton HospitalERI. Royal infirmary of EdinburghWHC. Whipps Cross University HospitalWAL. Walsgrave HospitalAMG. Wycombe General HospitalSAN. Sandwell District General HospitalHHW. Wellington HospitalMPH. Taunton & SomersetLIN. Lincoln County HospitalLGI. Yorkshire Heart CentreWYT. Wythenshawe HospitalMRI. Manchester Royal InfirmaryBAS. Basildon HospitalBHH. Rochdale InfirmaryBHL. Liverpool Heart and Chest HospitalBOU. Royal Bournemouth GeneralCGH. Conquest HospitalCHN. Nottingham City HospitalDER. Derby Royal InfirmaryDGE. Eastbourne DGHFRM. Frimley Park HospitalGRL. Glenfield HospitalKGH. Kettering General HospitalKSX. Kent & Sussex HospitalNIN. Ninewells HospitalNTH. Northampton General HospitalQEB. Queen Elizabeth HospitalSCM. James Cook University HospitalSPH. St Peter's HospitalSTM. St Mary's HospitalUCL. University College HospitalVIC. Victoria HospitalWRC. Worcestershire Royal HospitalRDE. Royal Devon & Exeter HospitalLIS. Lister HospitalSTH. St Thomas' HospitalHH. Harefield HospitalBRD. Bradford Royal InfirmaryGJH. Golden Jubilee HospitalPAP. Papworth HospitalBHR. Royal Berkshire and Battle HospitalMAY. Mayday University HospitalPLY. Derriford HospitalWHH. William Harvey HospitalMOR. Morriston HospitalNHH. North Hampshire HospitalSTO. North Staffordshire HospitalWEX. Wexham Park HospitalUHW. University Hospital of WalesEBH. Birmingham Heartlands HospitalFRE. Freeman HospitalNGS. Northern General HospitalNOR. Norfolk & Norwich HospitalCHG. Cheltenham General HospitalCHH. Castle Hill HospitalTOR. Torbay HospitalDUD. City HospitalBRI. Bristol Royal InfirmaryHSC. Harley Street ClinicCLW. Glan Clwyd DGH TrustDVH. Darent Valley HospitalRSC. Royal Sussex County HospitalWDH. Dorset County HospitalWRG. Worthing HospitalWAT. Watford General HospitalSUN. Sunderland Royal HospitalFRY. Frenchay HospitalKCH. King's College HospitalPMS. The Great Western HospitalRFH. Royal Free HospitalNCR. New Cross HospitalSGH. Southampton General HospitalGEO. St George's HospitalHAM. Hammersmith HospitalRIA. Aberdeen Royal InfirmaryRVB. Royal Victoria HospitalBAL. Barts and the LondonQAP. Queen Alexandra HospitalNPH. Northwick Park HospitalCRG. Craigavon Area HospitalBAT. Royal United Hospital BathESU. East Surrey HospitalANT. St Anthony's HospitalPHB. BMI Priory HospitalAHM. BMI Alexandra HospitalBFT. Belfast City HospitalBMI. BMI Meriden HospitalCBS. BUPA Hospital SouthamptonCRO. Cromwell HospitalEAL. Ealing HospitalGWH. Queen Elizabeth Hospital,HAI. Hairmyres HospitalHBP. BUPA Hospital, Hull & East RidingIND. London Independent HospitalKMH. Kings Mill HospitalLEB. BUPA Hospital LeedsLNH. Leeds Nuffield HospitalMHO. Manor HospitalPHN. BMI Park HospitalRHH. Ross Hall HospitalYKC. Capio Yorkshire Clinic
2009 data: Ludman
As August 2010
UK E&W (NHS)
Scotland
(NHS)
N. Ireland
PCIs 83,130 71,277 7,153 3,049
In CCAD 77,578 69,074 5,896 1,577
Missing 5,552 2,203 1,257 1,472
% Missing 6.7% 3.1% 17.6% 48.3%
% Completeness12 fields required for risk adjusted outcome NWQIP
Top score potential = 1200
2006 2007 2008 2009
Audit Potential
• Structure
• Appropriateness
• Process
• Outcome
Audit Potential
• Structure
• Appropriateness
• Process
• Outcome
No PPCI
PPCI day
PPCI 24/7
Angiography (76)
PCI (105)
No PPCI
PPCI day
PPCI 24/7
Angiography (76)
PCI (105)
Audit Potential
• Structure
• Appropriateness
• Process
• Outcome
Appropriateness
Primary PCI - ? Case selection% Cases over 80 (2009 data)
2009 data: Ludman
11.7%
Number of PPCI procedures
% o
f ca
ses
with
age
ove
r 80
yrs
Primary PCI - ? Case selection% Cases over 80 (2009 data)
2009 data: Ludman
11.7%
Number of PPCI procedures
% o
f ca
ses
with
age
ove
r 80
yrs
Appropriateness
73426
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases
2008 data: Ludman
Under analysis
Accepted asappropriate
Appropriateness
73426
40117
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable / Acute
2008 data: Ludman
Acute
Appropriateness
40117
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable / Acute
Of Stable Cases
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
CCS
4
3
2
1
0
UnK
2008 data: Ludman
Appropriateness
40117
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable / Acute
Of Stable Cases
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
CCS
4
3
2
1
0
UnK
2008 data: Ludman
Appropriateness
40117
Unk
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable /Acute
CCS
Of Stable of CCS 0 or 1
944
1887
910
1070
189
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
NonInvasive
3. MPI
2. ETT
1. Rest ECG
0. No
UnK
2008 data: Ludman
Appropriateness
40117
Unk
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable /Acute
CCS
Of Stable of CCS 0 or 1
944
1887
910
1070
189
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
NonInvasive
3. MPI
2. ETT
1. Rest ECG
0. No
UnK
2008 data: Ludman
Appropriateness
40117
Unk
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable /Acute
CCS Non Inva
Of Stable, CCS 0/1, no non invasive testing
93
2435
144
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
IVUS /
FFR
IVUS/FFR
Remainder
UnK
2008 data: Ludman
Appropriateness
40117
Unk
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
All Cases Stable /Acute
CCS Non Inva
Of Stable, CCS 0/1, no non invasive testing
93
2435
144
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
IVUS /
FFR
IVUS/FFR
Remainder
UnK
2008 data: Ludman
Appropriateness
73426
40117
Unk
33309
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
AllCases
Stable /Acute
CCS Non Inv Invas
2008 data: Ludman
Number %
? Inappropriate 2435 3.3 %
Unknown 6587 8.8 %
• Stable• CCS 0/1• no non invasive testing• no invasive testing for ischaemia
Audit Potential
• Structure
• Appropriateness
• Process
• Outcome
Admitted fromthe community
Direct admissionto PCI centre
Transferto PCI centre
Admission toNon-PCI centre
Primary PCI
device
D1
D2
Primary PCIDirect and IHT: Call to Balloon times < 150 min
Number of Cases
% C
TB
< 1
50
min
2009 data: Ludman
75.3%
3 SD3 SD2 SD2 SD
Audit Potential
• Structure
• Appropriateness
• Process
• Outcome
All as % No. SuccessPartial
success
Fail no
compRe-PCI QMI
Em CABG
CVADeath
In hosp
Death
30/7 ONS
NSTEMI / UA no shock
26,555 92.9 2.3 4.0 0.3 0.2 0.09 0.07 0.56 1.3
All STEMI
no shock14,485 92.0 2.0 3.5 0.6 0.11 0.21 2.3 3.8
*Primary PCI 13,189 89.8 2.1 3.7 0.6 0.11 0.18 4.3 6.2
*Rescue PCI 1,695 92.0 1.6 2.4 0.9 0.12 0.7 4.0 5.8
Shock 1416 66.2 2.5 4.0 0.9 0.14 0.43 26.6 34.0
Outcome 20092009 data: Ludman
*all PPCI (includes shock / ventilation etc)
Primary PCI (includes shock/vent)
30 day ONS tracked Mortality 2009 data: Ludman
Number of PPCI procedures
% M
orta
lity
at 3
0 da
ys
6.2%
Shock andventilation INCLUDED
+3 σ+2 σ
-2 σ-3 σ
Observed MACCE
Predicted MACCE
NWQIP Model 2009 data: Ludman
Feedback to units
• Live view in Lotus Notes
• emailed reports
• Annual reports
National
PCI Unit
QEB
National
0.9%
2.0%
60% 35%
66% 55%
Delays ReportsMonthly
Cumulative FunnelsQuarterly
Audit Research
Audit Research
RegistryRCT
Randomised Control Trials
• Strengths– Randomisation– Ability to test hypotheses– Cause and effect conclusions– Precise and robust analysis
• Weakness– Focused entry criteria– costs limit patient number and FU duration
ESC STEMI Guidelines
13% based on RCTs
(Tricoci P JAMA 2009;301:831)
Euro Heart Survey
up to 89% wld be excluded from RCTs
(Hordijk_Trion M EHJ 2006;27:671)
Registry
• Strengths– Generalised entry
• full spectrum including high risk patients included– Population outcomes– Long follow up– Large numbers of patient assessed– Suited to Risk Modelling
• Weaknesses– Non randomised– Observational– Hypothesis generating (cause v effect uncertain)
SCAAR scare
? 32% Mortality
James S. EuroInt 2009;5:501
SCAAR scareJames S. EuroInt 2009;5:501
BCIS-CCADResearch Strategy
• NICOR– National Institute for Outcomes Research– Within the Institute of Cardiovascular Science at UCL– Links with Cardiovascular prevention unit– Newly appointed analyst
• UK research groups– Data governance framework– Data applications review group– 6 projects about to start, 2 await approval
Research: BCIS-CCAD
• Exploratory analyses
0 30/7 6/12 1 yrMortality: PCI Success 0.4% 0.9% 1.8%
Number at risk 2344 2331 2314 2292
Mortality: PCI failed 0.7% 2.1% 3.7%
Number at risk 1101 1089 1072 1054
Chronic Total Occlusions2008 Data with ONS track to May 2010
2009 data: Ludman
PCI Success
PCI Failure
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.97
0.43
1.1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Femoral Radial
% of all cases200720082009
2009 data: Ludman
Complication by Access routeComplications to hospital Dx:False aneurysmHaemorrhage (retroperitoneal, delay Dx, surgery)Art occlusion / dissectionAny need for surgery
0.09
0.06
0.1
0.06
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Femoral Radial
% Cases with CVA
2008
2009
2009 data: Ludman
Complication by Access routeCVA
• Diabetes
44.642.7 44.4
16.1 14.9 15.6 15.8
45.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2005 2006 2007 2008
Asian
European
Diabetes by Ethnicity2008 data: Ludman
27.1 27.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
BMI
AsianEuropean
• BMI
BMI by Ethnicity2008
2008 data: Ludman
• Diabetes
44.642.7 44.4
16.1 14.9 15.6 15.8
45.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2005 2006 2007 2008
Asian
European
Diabetes by Ethnicity2008 data: Ludman
Outcomes from PCI in South Asians?
Risk Models
• Large unselected population• Validated mortality• Potential to cross link datasets
– MINAP: ACS / re-MI– SCTS: CABG– HES: re-admission
BUT ….
OutcomeData for 2007, 2008 and 2009 2009 data: Ludman
Risk Adjusted MACCE
Number of PCI procedures
% M
AC
CE
OutcomeData for 2007, 2008 and 2009 2009 data: Ludman
Risk Adjusted MACCE
Number of PCI procedures
% M
AC
CE
MOU
OutcomeData for 2007, 2008 and 2009 2009 data: Ludman
Risk Adjusted MACCE
Number of PCI procedures
% M
AC
CE
• Model out of date• Over report procedural risk• Under report adverse outcome
Cardiogenic Shock% Cases with shock by PCI unit
2009 data: Ludman Shock in 1.8% of cases (1416 of 77,660)
Cardiogenic Shock% Cases with shock by PCI unit
2009 data: Ludman Shock in 1.8% of cases (1416 of 77,660)
• Model out of dateRecalibrateNew model
• Over report procedural riskAvoid subjective measuresPeer review
• Under report adverse outcomeMortality only
Research:Current potential projects
• Outcomes– in South Asians– by access route– after CTO intervention
• HES v BCIS for revalidation• Variation in outcomes by unit
– Unit features (volume / organisation…)– Patient presentation and demographics
• Models for mortality after PCI
Conclusions
• Audit potential– Valuable contribution– Evolving analyses and feedback systems
• Research potential– Dataset quantity and quality improving– Huge potential for registry based investigation– Strategy
• NICOR• UK Research groups
The End