1
Potencial use of coffee agroforestry systems to adaptation-mitigation synergies for climate change Canal, D.S. 1 , Andrade, H.J. 1 1 Grupo de Investigación Producción Ecoamigable de Cultivos Tropicales (PROECUT) Facultad de Ingeniería Agronómica Universidad del Tolima; Ibagué – Colombia Contact: [email protected] Materials and methods This study estimated the mitigation-adaptation synergy (MAS) in the three most dominant coffee production systems in Líbano, Tolima – Colombia: agroforestry system (AFS) with Cordia alliodora (AFS-C), AFS with plantain (AFS- P) and monoculture (M) (Andrade et al., 2014). Carbon footprint and diversity of ants were estimated as mitigation and adaptation indicators, respectively. Results The inclusion of trees in coffee production systems changed from negative to positive the carbon footprint: 12.8 vs -3.0 vs -6.4 Mg CO 2 e/ha/year for AFS-C, AFS-P and M, respectively) (Figure 1). In the same way, AFS-C had the highest richness of ants according to Margalef index (1.3) than AFS-P and M (0.6); in contrast, no differences between systems were detected in Shannon-Wiener and Simpson Index (Figure 1). The genus Cephalotes, Dorymyrmex, Hypoponera, Pachycondyla, Octostruma and Proceratium were exclusively found in AFS-C due to its requirement of high biomass and necromass. Conclusions The AFS that includes native trees, can be an acceptable strategy for mitigation-adaptation to climate change, due to its advantages in improving carbon footprint and hosting a high diversity of ants. The AFS-C have characteristics more similar to natural forests which allow to generate more services as carbon sequestration and those derived from biodiversity conservation. Introduction Mitigation and adaptation have been proposed by the international community as the main strategies to face the climate change, but its integration is taking more relevance. Figure 1. Comparison of adaptation and mitigation variables indicators in the three most dominant coffee production system in Líbano, Tolima – Colombia. References Andrade, H., Segura, M. A., Canal, D. S., Feria, M., Alvarado, J., Marín, L., Pachón, D., Gómez, M. 2014. The carbon footprint of coffee production chains in Tolima, Colombia. En: Oelberman, M. Ed. Sustainable agroecosystems in climate change mitigation. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. P.53-66.

Introduction - Cirad · 2019. 7. 2. · P) and monoculture (M) (Andrade et al., 2014). Carbon footprint and diversity of ants were estimated as mitigation and adaptation indicators,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction - Cirad · 2019. 7. 2. · P) and monoculture (M) (Andrade et al., 2014). Carbon footprint and diversity of ants were estimated as mitigation and adaptation indicators,

Potencial use of coffee agroforestry systems to adaptation-mitigation

synergies for climate changeCanal, D.S.1, Andrade, H.J.1

1Grupo de Investigación Producción Ecoamigable de Cultivos Tropicales (PROECUT)

Facultad de Ingeniería Agronómica

Universidad del Tolima; Ibagué – Colombia

Contact: [email protected]

Materials and methodsThis study estimated the mitigation-adaptation synergy(MAS) in the three most dominant coffee productionsystems in Líbano, Tolima – Colombia: agroforestry system(AFS) with Cordia alliodora (AFS-C), AFS with plantain (AFS-P) and monoculture (M) (Andrade et al., 2014). Carbonfootprint and diversity of ants were estimated asmitigation and adaptation indicators, respectively.

ResultsThe inclusion of trees in coffee production systems changedfrom negative to positive the carbon footprint: 12.8 vs -3.0vs -6.4 Mg CO2e/ha/year for AFS-C, AFS-P and M,respectively) (Figure 1). In the same way, AFS-C had thehighest richness of ants according to Margalef index (1.3)than AFS-P and M (0.6); in contrast, no differences betweensystems were detected in Shannon-Wiener and SimpsonIndex (Figure 1). The genus Cephalotes, Dorymyrmex,Hypoponera, Pachycondyla, Octostruma and Proceratiumwere exclusively found in AFS-C due to its requirement ofhigh biomass and necromass.

ConclusionsThe AFS that includes native trees, can be anacceptable strategy for mitigation-adaptation toclimate change, due to its advantages in improvingcarbon footprint and hosting a high diversity of ants.The AFS-C have characteristics more similar to naturalforests which allow to generate more services ascarbon sequestration and those derived frombiodiversity conservation.

IntroductionMitigation and adaptation havebeen proposed by theinternational community as themain strategies to face the climatechange, but its integration is takingmore relevance.

Figure 1. Comparison of adaptation and mitigation variables indicators in the three most dominant coffee productionsystem in Líbano, Tolima – Colombia.

ReferencesAndrade, H., Segura, M. A., Canal, D. S., Feria, M., Alvarado, J., Marín, L., Pachón, D., Gómez, M. 2014. The carbon footprint of coffee production chains in Tolima, Colombia. En: Oelberman, M. Ed. Sustainable agroecosystems in climate change mitigation. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. P.53-66.