Upload
melvyn-daniel
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction
Newell Creek Reservoir Data Organization and Algal Bloom Analysis
December 11, 2012City of Santa Cruz Water Department
Presented by CSUMB ENVS 660 Class:Scott Blanco, Brittani Bohlke, Cherie Crawford, Christina David, Thomas DeLay, Shane Keefauver, Gwen Miller, Polly Perkins, Rochelle Petruccelli,
Kirk Post, John Silveus
Instructor: Fred Watson
Goal
The goal of this study was to digitize and organize all
available data provided by the City of Santa Cruz
Water Department for the Newell Creek Reservoir
watershed, and to use the data for analysis of
phytoplankton dynamics.
Overview
I. BackgroundJohn Silveus
II. Public DatabaseRochelle Petruccelli & Shane Keefauver
III.HydrologyThomas Delay & Kirk Post
IV.Algal SummaryCherie Crawford & Gwen Miller
V. Algal Dynamics – Methods, Results, DiscussionChristina David & Scott Blanco
VI.ConclusionsBrittani Bohlke
VII.Questions
Background
• Newell Creek Reservoir is a critical water source for the City of Santa Cruz.
• Loch Lomond is a popular recreation area, with 50,000 visitors a year.
Background
• During summer months, periodic freshwater algal blooms have been observed.
• Blooms can impact water quality, water treatment efficiency, fish populations, and the beneficial recreational use of the reservoir.
http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov
Public Database
Newell Creek Reservoir watershed data ranges from 1958-2012, of which 1958-1988 were in hardcopy form and required digitization. Data included:• Water Quality• Plankton• Precipitation• Flow• Reservoir Elevation• Wildlife
Data Availability Figure
Public DatabaseExcerpt from public database website
Under Construction!
Hydrology Summary
0
2
4
6
8
1/1/2003 1/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011
Newell Creek Watershed
Prec
ipit
atio
n(in/d
ay)
Newell Creek watershed
0
100
200
300
400
1/1/2003 1/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011
Newell Creek Mainstem
b)
Dis
char
ge
(CFS
)
Newell Creek Mainstem
555
565
575
585
595
1/1/2003 1/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 1/1/2010 1/1/2011
Year
Reservoir
Spillway
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
c)
Elev
atio
n(f
t)
ReservoirSpillway
a)
470
490
510
530
550
570
8 12 16 20 24
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
470
490
510
530
550
570
8 12 16 20 24
470
490
510
530
550
570
8 12 16 20 24
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 3 6 9 12
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 3 6 9 12
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 3 6 9 12
Temperature (°C)
DO (mg/ L)
January February March April May June
July August September October November December
2007 (Dry) 2009 (Average) 2010 (Wet)
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 3 6 9 12
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 3 6 9 12
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 3 6 9 12
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 10 20 30 40
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 10 20 30 40
470
490
510
530
550
570
0 10 20 30 40
0
8
16
24
32
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
08
162432
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
0
8
16
24
32
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Turbidity (NTU)2007 (Dry) 2009 (Average) 2010 (Wet)
Color (CU)
Secchi Depth (ft)
January February March April May June
July August September October November December
470
490
510
530
550
570
6 7 8 9 10
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
470
490
510
530
550
570
6 7 8 9 10
470
490
510
530
550
570
6 7 8 9 10
470
490
510
530
550
570
300 350 400 450 500
Elev
atio
n (f
t)
470
490
510
530
550
570
300 350 400 450 500
470
490
510
530
550
570
300 350 400 450 500
pH2007 (Dry) 2009 (Average) 2010 (Wet)
Conductivity (umhos/ cm)
January February March April May June
July August September October November December
Phytoplankton Summary
Total phytoplankton count and chlorophyll concentration with algaecide applications at Site 2 of the Newell Creek Reservoir.
Digitized phytoplankton data were plotted (2003-2012) from Site 2.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Chlo
roph
yll c
once
ntra
tion
(mg/
m3)
Phyt
opla
nkto
n co
unt (
NU/
mL)
Phytoplankton
Algaecide Application
Chlorophyll
List of all plankton taxa that have occurred from 2003-2012.
Algae Flagellate Cyanobacteria Protist/ ProtozoaDiatom Chrysochromulina Agmenellum ProtistAsterionella Phytoconis Anabaena ActinophrysCyclotella Unknown Flagellates Anacystis EuglenaCymbella Dinoflagellate Aphanizomenon ProtozoaFragilaria Ceratium Aphanizomenon gracile Unknown ProtozoanMelosira Peridinium Lyngbya CiliatesNavicula Euglenoid Microcystis ColpodaNitzschia Trachelomonas Oscillatoria Vorticella Pennate Diatom PhormidiumStephanodiscus PlanktolyngbyaSynedra Pseudo AnabaenaTabellaria WoronichiniaUnknown DiatomCryptomonadCryptomonas CryptophyteGolden AlgaeChrysococcus DinobryonMallamonasSynuraGreen AlgaeAnkistrodesmus AnkyraChlamydomonasChlorellaChlorococcumClosteriumCoelastrum EudorinaGolenkiniaMonoraphidiumOocystis Palmella PalmellopsisPediastrumPhytoconisScenedesmusSphaerocystis Staurastrum Volvox
http://www.micrographia.com/specbiol/bacteri/bacter/bact0200/anabae03.htm
http://www.cyanobacteria-platform.com/cyanobacteria.html
Phytoplankton count for Site 2 at Newell Creek Reservoir at the surface of the reservoir, an elevation of 550 ft, and 530 ft.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Surface
(573-
576 ft)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Phyt
opla
nkto
n
abundan
ce (N
U/m
L)
Cyanobacteria
Algae
Flagellatte
Protist/ Protozoa
550ft
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
530ft
Plankton Dynamics
Newell Creek Reservoir has experienced recurrent
phytoplankton blooms which have been
monitored and treated to stem high densities
and associated water quality issues.
Erin Stanfield
Environmental factors considered here that can affect bloom density, timing and composition:
• Temperature
• Conductivity
• Dissolved oxygen (DO)
• pH
• Precipitation and flow
• Turbidity and light availability
Limited data available: Nutrients
Plankton Dynamics
Plankton Dynamics
The main phytoplankton of interest for management at Newell Creek Reservoir is cyanobacteria (“blue-green algae”):
Cyanobacteria taxa of interest:• Anabaena spp.• Aphanizomenon spp.• Lyngbya spp.
Plankton DynamicsTop functional groups were ranked based on the minimum NU count treated for a bloom during the study period.
Final groupings: Cyanobacteria, Diatoms, &
Green AlgaeCyanobacteria Anabaena XCyanobacteria Aphanizomenon XCyanobacteria Lyngbya XDiatom Unknown diatom
Diatom NitzchiaDiatom AsterionellaDiatom CyclotellaDiatom FragilariaDiatom MelosiraDiatom Navicula
Flagellatea Unknown flagellate
Flagellatea ChrysochromulinaGreen Algae AnkyraGreen Algae OosystisGreen Algae PalmellaGreen Algae PalmellopsisGreen Algae Sphaerocystis
Flagellatea Chrysochromulina
Flagellatea Unknown flagellate
Reported or inferred
target for algaecide
applicationGeneraFunctional Group
Plankton Dynamics - Methods
1. Time series graphs and select scatter plots of NU plankton counts v. environmental parameters for:
• Anabaena, Aphanizomenon, and Lyngbya (2003-2012)
• Cyanobacteria, diatoms, and green algae (2003-2012)
• Close-up of Anabaena in 2010 (wet year)
Plankton Dynamics - Methods
2. Spearman Rank Correlation tests, NU plankton count v. environmental parameter for these datasets:• Diatom (surface)• Green Algae (surface)• Cyanobacteria (surface, 550 ft, 530 ft)• Cyanobacteria “bloom season” subset
(surface)
Plankton Dynamics - Results
PrecipitationIntensity of bloom may be tied to intensity of nutrient flows delivered by precipitation and surface water flow, however the relationship may not be linear
Plankton Dynamics - Results
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Upper Newell Creek Peak Discharge (cfs)
Cyan
obac
teria
Pea
k Ab
unda
nce
(NU/
mL)
Peak discharge and peak cyanobacterial densityPeak discharge in the preceding water year corresponds with peak cyanobacteria densities (need to assess more years)
Plankton Dynamics - ResultsTemperatureNo discernible patterns or correlations between temperature and bloom intensity at ten year time scale
Plankton Dynamics - Results
Interspecific interactions• Anabaena appears to be the dominant taxa, occurring in every bloom year, seemingly outcompeting Aphanizomenon.
• However in the 2011 bloom season, Aphanizomenon reached high densities, possibly being release from competition with Anabaena following algaecide treatment
Plankton Dynamics - Results
Phytoplankton and environmental interactionsOccurrence of diatoms in the cooler spring “clear-water phase” preceding warmer water cyanobacteria blooms.
Plankton Dynamics - Results
Phytoplankton and environmental interactionsDiatoms occur during higher flow and precipitation periods that precede cyanobacteria dominated low flow and precipitation periods
Plankton Dynamics - Results
2010 Anabaena bloom analysis
Plankton Dynamics - Results
2010 Anabaena bloom analysis (continued)
Plankton Dynamics - Results
Spearman Rank Correlation
• Tests resulted in many significant p-values, most of the correlations (rhos) were weak (<0.25)
rho p-value rho p-value rho p-value rho p-value rho p-value rho p-valueTemperature 0.11 <0.01 0.24 <0.01 0.13 <0.01 -0.02 0.59 -0.7 0.12 -0.25 <0.01Conductivity 0.33 <0.01 0.11 0.02 0.11 0.02 0.01 0.8 -0.01 0.84 0.07 0.09DO 0.09 0.03 0.23 <0.01 -0.09 0.06 -0.04 0.37 0.12 <0.01 -0.1 0.01pH 0.51 <0.01 0.44 <0.01 0.09 0.05 0.22 <0.01Precipitation -0.19 <0.01 -0.07 0.17 -0.02 0.54Upper Newell Creek flow -0.23 <0.01 0.03 0.53 0.1 <0.01Secchi depth -0.39 <0.01 -0.61 <0.01 -0.18 <0.01Turbidity 0.42 <0.01 0.66 <0.01 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.01 -0.03 0.37
Green Algae (Surface)
Cyanobacteria (Surface)
Cyanobacteria (Surface, bloom season)
Cyanobacteria (550 ft elevation
Cyanobacteria (530 ft elevation)
Diatoms (Surface)
Plankton Dynamics - Results
Spearman Rank Correlation
Cyanobacteria versus pH, Secchi depth, and turbidity yielded moderate to strong (0.3-0.5 moderate & >0.5 strong) correlations
• These correlations were largely assumed to be caused BY the blooms, not vice versa
Summary of Results
Precipitation Flow
Nutrients
Temperature
Algaecide Treatment
Cyanobacteria Bloom
- Interspecies interactions (+/-)- Role of turbidity/light availability (+) +/-
Inferences on cause of algal blooms:
Discussion
Future Analysis Recommendations
• Create subset of green algae for bloom periods
• Disconnect between bloom data and environmental parameter changes (precipitation, temperature) – time lag
• Degree days instead of temperature data
Discussion
Data Collection and Processing Recommendations
• Collect turbidity and nutrient load data from Newell Creek inflows
• Collect regular nutrient samples from current reservoir sampling sites
• Consider augmenting NUs with additional biomass-related lab metrics
Discussion
Recommendations for Future Projects
• Analyze temperature for genera-specific bloom predictions
• Further examination of taxa between depths
• In situ environmental probe
Conclusions
• Organized and documented existing data
• Demonstrated one approach to begin comprehensively visualizing and analyzing data
• Provided basis for future analyses
• A few inferences were made - not able to clearly identify causes of blooms
• Nutrient data are needed
Acknowledgements
The CSUMB Advanced Watershed Science and Policy Class of 2012 would like to recognize the following for their contributions to our efforts:
SCWD - Chris Berry, Terry Tompkins, Hugh Dalton, Ryan Basset, Ezekiel Bean
CSUMB - Erin Stanfield and Fred Watson for their endless patience
Questions?
Erin Stanfield