Upload
marah-meyers
View
46
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Natural Language Processing. ChengXiang Zhai Department of Computer Science University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Lecture Plan. What is NLP? A brief history of NLP The current state of the art NLP and text information systems. What is NLP?. Thai:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Introduction to
Natural Language Processing
ChengXiang Zhai
Department of Computer Science
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
2
Lecture Plan
• What is NLP?
• A brief history of NLP
• The current state of the art
• NLP and text information systems
3
What is NLP?
… เรา เล่�น ฟุ�ตบอล่ …
How can a computer make sense out of this string?
Thai:
- What are the basic units of meaning (words)?- What is the meaning of each word? - How are words related with each other? - What is the “combined meaning” of words? - What is the “meta-meaning”? (speech act)- Handling a large chunk of text- Making sense of everything
Syntax
Semantics
Pragmatics
Morphology
DiscourseInference
4
An Example of NLP
A dog is chasing a boy on the playgroundDet Noun Aux Verb Det Noun Prep Det Noun
Noun Phrase Complex Verb Noun PhraseNoun Phrase
Prep PhraseVerb Phrase
Verb Phrase
Sentence
Dog(d1).Boy(b1).Playground(p1).Chasing(d1,b1,p1).
Semantic analysis
Lexicalanalysis
(part-of-speechtagging)
Syntactic analysis(Parsing)
A person saying this maybe reminding another person to
get the dog back…
Pragmatic analysis(speech act)
Scared(x) if Chasing(_,x,_).+
Scared(b1)
Inference
5
If we can do this for all the sentences, then …
BAD NEWS:
Unfortunately, we can’t.
General NLP = “AI-Complete”
6
NLP is Difficult!!
• Natural language is designed to make human communication efficient. As a result,
– we omit a lot of “common sense” knowledge, which we assume the hearer/reader possesses
– we keep a lot of ambiguities, which we assume the hearer/reader knows how to resolve
• This makes EVERY step in NLP hard
– Ambiguity is a “killer”!
– Common sense reasoning is pre-required
7
Examples of Challenges
• Word-level ambiguity: E.g.,
– “design” can be a noun or a verb (Ambiguous POS)
– “root” has multiple meanings (Ambiguous sense)
• Syntactic ambiguity: E.g.,
– “natural language processing” (Modification)
– “A man saw a boy with a telescope.” (PP Attachment)
• Anaphora resolution: “John persuaded Bill to buy a TV for himself.” (himself = John or Bill?)
• Presupposition: “He has quit smoking.” implies that he smoked before.
8
Despite all the challenges, research in NLP has also made
a lot of progress…
9
High-level History of NLP• Early enthusiasm (1950’s): Machine Translation
– Too ambitious
– Bar-Hillel report (1960) concluded that fully-automatic high-quality translation could not be accomplished without knowledge (Dictionary + Encyclopedia)
• Less ambitious applications (late 1960’s & early 1970’s): Limited success, failed to scale up
– Speech recognition
– Dialogue (Eliza)
– Inference and domain knowledge (SHRDLU=“block world”)
• Real world evaluation (late 1970’s – now)– Story understanding (late 1970’s & early 1980’s)
– Large scale evaluation of speech recognition, text retrieval, information extraction (1980 – now)
– Statistical approaches enjoy more success (first in speech recognition & retrieval, later others)
• Current trend: – Heavy use of machine learning techniques
– Boundary between statistical and symbolic approaches is disappearing.
– We need to use all the available knowledge
– Application-driven NLP research (bioinformatics, Web, Question answering…)
Stat. language models
Robust component techniques
Learning-based NLP
Applications
Knowledge representation
Deep understanding in
limited domainShallow understanding
10
The State of the Art
A dog is chasing a boy on the playgroundDet Noun Aux Verb Det Noun Prep Det Noun
Noun Phrase Complex Verb Noun PhraseNoun Phrase
Prep PhraseVerb Phrase
Verb Phrase
Sentence
Semantics: some aspects
- Entity/relation extraction- Word sense disambiguation- Anaphora resolution
POSTagging:
97%
Parsing: partial >90%(?)
Speech act analysis: ???
Inference: ???
11
Technique Showcase: POS Tagging
This sentence serves as an example of Det N V1 P Det N P annotated text… V2 N
Training data (Annotated text)
POS Tagger“This is a new sentence”This is a new sentenceDet Aux Det Adj N
This is a new sentenceDet Det Det Det Det
… …Det Aux Det Adj N … …V2 V2 V2 V2 V2
Consider all possibilities,and pick the one withthe highest probability
Method 1: Independent assignmentMost common tag
Method 2: Partial dependency
1 1
1 1 1
11
( ,..., , ,..., )
( | )... ( | ) ( )... ( )
( | ) ( | )
k k
k k k
k
i i i ii
p w w t t
p t w p t w p w p w
p w t p t t
w1=“this”, w2=“is”, …. t1=Det, t2=Det, …,
roller skates12
Technique Showcase: ParsingS NP VPNP Det BNPNP BNPNP NP PPBNP NVP V VP Aux V NPVP VP PPPP P NP
V chasingAux isN dogN boyN playgroundDet theDet aP on
Grammar
Lexicon
Generate
S
NP VP
BNP
N
Det
A
dog
VP PP
Aux V
is
the playground
ona boy
chasing
NP P NP
S
NP VP
BNP
N
dog
PPAux V
is
ona boy
chasing
NP
P NP
Det
A
the playground
NP
1.00.30.40.3
1.0
…
…
0.01
0.003
…
…
Probability of this tree=0.000015
Choose a tree with highest prob….
Can also be treated as a classification/decision problem…
13
Semantic Analysis Techniques• Only successful for VERY limited domain or for
SOME aspect of semantics
• E.g.,
– Entity extraction (e.g., recognizing a person’s name): Use rules and/or machine learning
– Word sense disambiguation: addressed as a classification problem with supervised learning
– Sentiment tagging
– Anaphora resolution …
In general, exploiting machine learning
and statistical language models…
14
What We Can’t Do
• 100% POS tagging– “He turned off the highway.” vs “He turned off the fan.”
• General complete parsing– “A man saw a boy with a telescope.”
• Precise deep semantic analysis– Will we ever be able to precisely define the meaning of “own” in
“John owns a restaurant.”?
Robust & general NLP tends to be “shallow”,
while “deep” understanding doesn’t scale up
15
Major NLP Applications
• Speech recognition: e.g., Auto telephone call routing
• Text management and analysis – Text retrieval/filtering
– Text classification
– Text summarization
– Text mining
– Query answering
• Language tutoring– Spelling/grammar correction
• Machine translation– Cross-language retrieval
– Restricted natural language
• Natural language user interface
Our focus
16
NLP & Text Information Systems
Better NLP => Better Text Information Systems
Bad NLP => Bad Text Information Systems?
Robust shallow NLP tends to be more useful than fragile deep NLP.
Errors in NLP can hurt a text information system
17
How Much NLP is Really Needed?
Tasks Dependency on NLP
Classification/Retrieval
Summarization/
Extraction/
Topic Mining
Translation/Dialogue
Question Answering
“Easier” & More “workarounds”
18
Workaround Example I: ELIZA
Person : Men are all alike.ELIZA : In what way?Person : They're always bugging us about something or other.ELIZA : Can you think of a specific example?Person : Well, my boyfriend made me come here.ELIZA : Your boyfriend made you come here?Person : He says I'm depressed much of the time.ELIZA : I am sorry to hear that you are depressed.Person : It's true. I am unhappy.ELIZA : Do you think coming here will help you not to be unhappy?Person : I need some help, that much seems certain.ELIZA : What would it mean to you if you got some help?Person : Perhaps I could learn to get along with my mother.ELIZA : Tell me more about your family
ELIZA plays the role of a therapistHow does it work?
Heuristic rules based on Keyword matching! E.g.,
I remember X =>Do you often think of X?
always => Can you think of a specific example?
It keeps the dialogue going on, but NEVER makes any claim!
A breakdown example:Person : Failure is the mother of success.ELIZA : Tell me more about your family
No NLP, but useful. Perhaps we should call this NLP?Statistical NLP often has a similar flavor with “SOFT” rules LEARNED from data
19
Workaround Example II: Statistical Translation
Learn how to translate Chinese to English from many example translations
Intuitions:
- If we have seen all possible translations, then we simply lookup- If we have seen a similar translation, then we can adapt- If we haven’t seen any example that’s similar, we try to generalize what we’ve seen
EnglishSpeaker
TranslatorNoisyChannel
P(E) P(C|E)
EnglishWords (E)
ChineseWords(C)
EnglishTranslation
P(E|C)=?
All these intuitions are captured through a probabilistic model
20
So, what NLP techniques are most useful for text information systems?
Statistical NLP in general, and
statistical language models in particular
The need for high robustness and efficiency implies the dominant use of
simple models (i.e., unigram models)
21
What You Should Know
• NLP is the foundation of text information systems– Better NLP enables better text management
– Better NLP is necessary for sophisticated tasks
• But – Bad NLP doesn’t mean bad text information systems
– There are often “workarounds” for a task
– Inaccurate NLP can hurt the performance of a task
• The most effective NLP techniques are often statistical with the help of linguistic knowledge
• The challenge is to bridge the gap between imperfect NLP and useful application functions