Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Abstract
Conclusions
A
Acknowledgements
Figure 1. Imetelstat Treatment of SUM149PT Cells Inhibits Telomerase Activity in a Dose-dependent Manner.
Telomerase Products
IC
[Imetelstat], uM
Figure 3. Three-week Imetelstat Pretreatment Inhibits Clonogenic Survival in BRCA1 Deficient Cells.
Culture cells in presence of drug for 2-3 passages (2-3
weeks)
Experimental Set-up
Plate cells at a density to passage 1 x per week
Treat with Imetelstat or mismatch after cell attachment (Day 2) and
refresh drug every 3 days
Plate at low density and allow to grow undisturbed
for 11-18 days
24hr treatment
Investigating the Role of BRCA1 in Sensitivity to Imetelstat, a Telomerase Template Antagonist Elizabeth A. Phipps1, Sergei M. Gryaznov2 and Brittney-Shea Herbert1
1Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA 2Geron Corporation, 230 Constitution Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
BRCA1 Mutant Cell Lines Used
Domain Ring finger BRCT
Interacting Proteins
BARD1 UbcH5c BAP1 E2F1
Rad50 Mre11 Nbs1
BRCC complex
BRIP/FANCJ HADC1/2
P53 pRB
Function E3 ubiquitin ligase activity Phospho-peptide binding,
transcriptional activation; BRCA1 localization to damage sites
Adapted from Tomlinson et al. (1998) Cancer Research
HCC1937 5382insC
MDA.MB.436 5396+1G>A
SUM149PT 2288delT
Table 1. Summary of Morphologic Changes Induced by Imetelstat Treatment
This work was supported by DOD BCRP predoctoral fellowship BC093058 (award #W81XWH-10-1-0165). We also thank the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (IUSCC) for providing a 2012 IUSCC Travel Award to attend the AACR annual meeting. We thank Jillian Koziel for technical
assistance and all Herbert Lab members for helpful discussions. SUM149PT cells were a kind gift from Dr. George Sledge (IUSCC). We thank Dr. Stephen Elledge for the HCC1937+BRCA1 cells and
Dr. Sergei Gryaznov (Geron Corp.) for providing the Imetelstat.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% in
hibi
tion
vs. u
ntre
ated
[Imetelstat], uM
Telomerase Products
IC
Δ - MM + - + - + - + - + - + - + - +
Figure 2. Imetelstat Treatment Inhibits Telomerase Activity in BRCA1 Deficient Cells.
DNA input 1.5ug
21.2 kb
8.6 kb 7.4 kb 6.1 kb 5.1/5.0/4.9 kb 4.2kb 3.6/3.5 kb 2.7 kb 2.0/1.9/1.8 kb 1.6/1.5 kb 1.4/1.3 kb 1.1 kb
Figure 6. Long-term Imetelstat Treatment Induces Complete Cell Death in HCC1937 pBp Cells.
UWB1.289
[GRN163L], uM [CCDP], uM CI
0.85 0.01 6.19E+09
0.85 0.1 0.501
0.85 1 0.243
0.85 10 0.155
UWB1.289+BRCA1
[GRN163L], uM [CCDP], uM CI
0.85 0.01 4.87E+14
0.85 0.1 0.782
0.85 1 0.108
0.85 10 0.601
HCC1937
HCC1937+BRCA1
UT 3.4uM Imetelstat
UWB1.289
UWB1.289+BRCA1
All cell lines tested exhibited a dose-dependent response to treatment with Imetelstat, but not a mismatch oligonucleotide. We observed differential sensitivity among cell lines tested to Imetelstat, at clinically relevant concentrations, in terms of morphology and both TRAP and clonogenic survival assays. UWB1.289 cells exhibit a shorter average telomere length at baseline compared to UWB1.289+BRCA1 cells, and both cell lines show telomere shortening over a three-week period due to Imetelstat treatment. Long-term treatment with Imetelstat preferentially induces cell death in BRCA1 mutant HCC1937 pBp cells. Population doubling study using UWB1.289 and UWB1.289+BRCA1 cells are ongoing. Cis-platin pretreatment synergizes with Imetelstat in UWB cells. Concurrent Doxorubicin treatment synergizes with Imetelstat in HCC cells.
50
60
70
80
90
100
% in
hibi
tion
vs. u
ntre
ated
24hr treatment
Figure 4. Baseline Telomere Lengths Among BRCA1 Cell Lines. Figure 5. Imetelstat-Treated Ovarian Cancer Cells Exhibit
Progressive Telomere Shortening. UWB1.289 2594delC
*P<0.05 ***P<0.001
0 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Week
UWB1.289 UWB1.289+BRCA1
Untreated MM GRN163L Untreated MM GRN163L
Mar
ker
Con
trol
MC
F7
MD
A.M
B.4
68
LB #245
BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene with a variety of functions related to safeguarding genomic integrity. Regulation of telomere length is crucial in maintaining genomic stability, with critically short telomeres leading to telomere uncapping, end-to-end fusions, activation of the DNA damage response, and cell cycle arrest. Recent evidence suggests knockdown of BRCA1 in cell lines increases both telomerase activity and average telomere length, but likely results in more unstable telomeres compared to BRCA1 wild-type cell lines. The objective of this study was to determine whether GRN163L, a telomerase template antagonist currently in clinical trials, has enhanced activity in BRCA1 mutant breast or ovarian cancer cell lines compared to paired BRCA1 wild-type breast/ovarian cancer cell lines. In addition, we sought to determine whether BRCA1 cell lines have shorter average telomere lengths than other cancer cell lines, making them more amenable to inhibition of telomerase activity. We utilized a panel of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines harboring both N-terminal and C-terminal BRCA1 mutations, in addition to matched cells expressing exogenous wild-type BRCA1, and assessed the effects of GRN163L or a mismatch oligonucleotide on telomerase activity and telomere length using the TRAP (Telomere Repeat Amplification Protocol) and TeloTAGGG assays, respectively. All cell lines tested exhibited a dose-dependent response to treatment with GRN163L, but not a mismatch control oligonucleotide. In addition, we observed differential sensitivity between BRCA1 mutant and BRCA1 wild-type cell lines tested to clinically relevant concentrations of GRN163L in both TRAP and clonogenic survival assays. Of interest, the majority of the cell lines tested showed gross morphological changes as early as 12 hours following inhibitor treatment. We found UWB1.289 cells have a shorter average telomere length at baseline compared to their BRCA1 wild-type counterpart cells, and saw progressive telomere shortening over a three-week period of treatment with GRN163L, but not with mismatch oligonucleotide. Furthermore, long-term (12 week) treatment with GRN163L preferentially induced complete cell death in HCC1937 (BRCA1 mutant) breast cancer cell population compared to HCC1937 cells reconstituted with wild-type BRCA1. Finally, we demonstrate that pretreatment with GRN163L acts synergistically with cis-platin in UWB1.289 and UWB1.289+BRCA1 ovarian cancer cells. In summary, this work provides insight into the role of BRCA1 mutations in cancer cells and their impact on sensitivity to the cellular effects of telomerase antagonism.
8.6 kb 7.4 kb 6.1 kb 5.1/5.0/4.9 kb 4.2kb 3.6/3.5 kb 2.7 kb 2.0/1.9/1.8 kb 1.6/1.5 kb 1.4/1.3 kb 1.1 kb
21.2 kb
Figure 7. Cis-platin Pretreatment (UWB cells) or Concurrent Doxorubicin Treatment (HCC cells)
Synergizes with Imetelstat.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Cum
ulat
ive
PDL
Days
UWB1.289
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Cum
ulat
ive
PDL
Days
UWB1.289+BRCA1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80
Cum
ulat
ive
PDL
Days
HCC1937 pBp
UT MM 3.4uM GRN163L 1.7uM GRN163L 0.85uM GRN163L
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 20 40 60 80
Cum
ulat
ive
PDL
Days
HCC1937+BRCA1
HCC1937 pBp [GRN163L], uM [Doxorubicin], uM CI
0.325 0.081 0.397 0.625 0.156 0.236 1.25 0.313 0.369 2.5 0.625 0.469 5 1.25 0.611
10 2.5 1.161 20 5 2.571
HCC1937+BRCA1 [GRN163L], uM [Doxorubicin], uM CI
0.325 0.081 0.066 0.625 0.156 0.111 1.25 0.313 0.189 2.5 0.625 0.328 5 1.25 0.574 10 2.5 1.223 20 5 2.471
A.
B.