19
© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV All rights reserved DETUMBLING Clean Space Industry days 23-27/05/2016 INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS REMOVAL

INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV

All rights reserved

DETUMBLINGClean Space Industry days23-27/05/2016

INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS REMOVAL

Page 2: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Project objectives Study logic & current status Work performed and major outcomes

– Task 1: Identification of classes of tumbling objects and survey of detumbling strategies

– Task 2: Techniques Trade-off and baseline selection + development of tumbling debris models.

– Task 3: GNC system design and analysis– Task 4: (Finalization, recommendations and future plans)

Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 2

Page 3: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV

All rights reserved

Project objectivesDETUMBLING

Page 4: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Identification and characterisation of existing classes of tumbling objects

Survey, trade-off and selection of de-tumbling concepts and strategies

Development of mathematical models for tumbling debris– Prediction models for long term tumbling debris attitude prediction– Synthesis models for control design– Non-linear models for performance evaluation (both tumbling target

and composite multi-body models) Baseline of a candidate concept and development of the GNC by

means of ROBUST MIMO synthesis and analysis techniques Analysis of the applicability/scalability to a wider range of

debris classes and contribution to technology Roadmaps

PROJECT OBJECTIVES

Page 4

Page 5: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV

All rights reserved

Study logic & current status

DETUMBLING

Page 6: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

STUDY LOGIC

KO: January 2015END: August 2016

Page 6

Page 7: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

STUDY LOGIC

Page 7

GNC DIVISION INTERNAL MEETING

Page 8: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Main processes and resources of the activity

STUDY LOGIC

Page 8

Page 9: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV

All rights reserved

Work performed and major outcomes

DETUMBLING

Page 10: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Detumbling strategies review

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 1

Rigid link

- Robotic arm- Tentacles- Nozzle

docking

Flexible link

- Net / harpoon+ tether

- Foam

Contact based Contactless

- Plume impingement- Impacting Pellets- Magnetic torque- Magnetic eddy

current- Electrostatic

Detumbling package

Passive methods:- Gravity gradient- Permanent magnets- Magnetic hysteresis- Magnetic eddy

currents- Mechanical dampers

Detumbling methods

Other

- Detumblingsubsatellite

- Robotic armpoking

- Airbags

Fixed link

Active chaser Target design

Page 10

Page 11: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Long Term Prediction (LTP) simulator (for debris rotational state)– To include only the strictly relevant effects

(computational efficiency)• Preliminary study of the order of magnitude of each

perturbation contribution for the long term behavior• Use analytical models and reasonable assumptions

to obtain the estimation of the individual contributions of each perturbation

– Implemented perturbations: gravity gradient, Earth magnetic torque, eddy currents, sloshing• Energy dissipation due to eddy current can be

important for long term prediction (typically for upper stages)– Analytical model available for basic shapes and

used to validate numerical model (surface is replaced by thin rods connected at nodes)

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 1ENVISAT study case

KOSMOS 3M study case

Current flow model oncylindrical tank

Page 11

Page 12: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Detumbling concepts trade-off – Analytical hierarchy process (Thomas Saaty, 1970s) was used for the

trade-off:• Breakdown of the problem into smaller sub-problems that are arranged in a

hierarchy, and pair-wise comparison of elements

– Robotic arm capture is selected as baseline for TASK 3 (GNC development) • Performs well across all three criteria (risk, technical, reliability)• High TRL (highest TRL of all capture and de-tumbling techniques)• Can partially be tested • Least amount of development would be required

– It is observed that contactless methods tend to perform well on risk criterion because • No physical contact and no attitude synchronization• Plume impingement de-tumbling and electrostatic tractor also perform well

on technical criteria• Contactless methods tend to score lower in reliability criterion

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 2

Page 12

Page 13: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Synthesis plants with solutions for multi-body systems– (e.g. using 2-port models Alazard, et al “Two-input two-output

port model for mechanical systems” 2015). It allows exchange of generalized accelerations and forces between the parent and child connections of an intermediate flexible element.

– We have developed extended 2-port models to consider also rotational flexibility in arm joints

Focus on configurations for close range operations and composite (ENVISAT + chaser linked by means of a robotic arm)

A single state-space model containing the linear dynamics for the multi-body system including:– Slosh/Flexible modes from the solar array on the Chaser– The capture mechanism (e.g. a multi-segment arm)– Rigid dynamics from the Target spacecraft– Flexible modes from appendages attached to the target.

Take into account the uncertainty for design and analysis (LFT representation)

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 3 – GNC SYNTHESIS

Page 13

Page 14: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Guidance – Computation of reference trajectory and attitude

profiles for close rendezvous– Safe trajectory for target approach, for

synchronisation with target body, and of the feed-forward actions (also including de-tumbling torques)

Control synthesis– Focus on close RDV, synchronisation/capture and

de-tumbling– Synchronisation and approach with deployed robotic

arm– Forced motion during de-tumbling, robust to:

• The M.C.I. properties of the composite • The set of thrusters, and a lower controllability during the

manoeuvre application• Flexibility of composite body (and links)

– Robust synthesis and analysis framework (Hinf. and uncertainty with LFT plants

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 3 – GNC SYNTHESIS

ACED Tool in GNCDE suite

Page 14

Page 15: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Forced Motion Control of Composite mode (preliminary control synthesis/analysis)

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 3 – GNC SYNTHESIS

0 10 20 30 40 50 60-2

0

2

4

6

ω [d

eg/s

]

Time [min]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

Forc

e cm

d N

Time [min]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

Torq

ue c

md

Nm

Time [min]0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-10

-5

0

5

Forc

e,To

rque

load

s N,

Nm

Time [min]

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1Lower and Upper Bound of Mu

rad/s

Force/Torque at interfacesCommanded Torque

Commanded Force

Angular velocity cancellationStability analysis

Page 15

Page 16: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

V&V in GNCDE – A representative non-linear performance simulator has

been developed (with SpaceLab libraries)– Several DKE configurations depending on the simulated

phase:• Close RDV with stowed robotic arm: Independent chaser

and target rigid bodies + solar array flexible modes and sloshing

• Robotic arm un-stowing & deployment/reconfiguration up to capture: Chaser multibody model (including a 3 segments robotic arm) + sloshing and independent target rigid body + solar array flexible modes

• Composite control (Chaser-Target multibody model with arm flexibility in locked configuration + solar array flexible modes and sloshing)

WORK PERFORMED: TASK 3 – GNC SYNTHESIS Induced base angular rate in

body frame by arm deployment

Effect from arm joints flexibilityon base angular rate after torque perturbation

Page 16

Page 17: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV

All rights reserved

SummaryDETUMBLING

Page 18: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 201623-27/05/16GMVCLEAN SPACE INDUSTRY DAYS

Extensive survey performed on tumbling objects classes and de-tumbling techniques (both contact and contact-less)

Selection of a baseline concept based on an Analytical Hierarchy Process trade-off (three sets of criteria used: risk, technical, reliability)

Specification of System and GNC requirements applicable to the baselined concept (robotic capture).

Development of mathematical models for tumbling debris long term prediction of the rotational state.

Development of rigid/flexible and multibody synthesis models for robust control synthesis/analysis (including LFT)

Development of a non-linear performance assessment simulator, including different Multibody configurations for chaser and composite (chaser + arm + target)

Currently progressing in the robust synthesis/analysis of MIMO controllers for close rendezvous, synchronisation/capture and detumbling phases.

SUMMARY

Page 18

Page 19: INVESTIGATION OF ACTIVE DETUMBLING SOLUTIONS FOR DEBRIS

© GMV, 2016 Property of GMV

All rights reserved

Thank you

Thomas Vincent Peters

Nuno Miguel Gomes Paulino

Fernando Gandía