Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INVESTIGATION OF LOWER SPINE COMPRESSION FRACTURES IN FRONTAL CRASHESRodney W. Rudd, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
CompanyLogo Here
SAE INTERNATIONAL
• Lower spine includes:– 10th through 12th thoracic vertebrae– 1st through 5th lumbar vertebrae
• Focus is on planar frontal crashes– Crashes without major vertical loading to undercarriage– No rollovers
• Trends in data• Development of research• Current research
Overview
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 2
SAE INTERNATIONAL
• Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) as sentinel– More frequent observation of lumbar and lower thoracic fractures
• Frontal crashes (planar)• Newer vehicles• Belted occupants• More compressive in nature
– Catalyst role of CIREN spawned a research project
Observations in Field Crashes
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 3
SAE INTERNATIONAL
• NASS-CDS– Looked at specific injury codes (AIS) for vertebral body fractures T10-L5– Identified trend of increasing incidence with newer model year vehicles in
frontal crashes compared to other crash modes• Updated analysis in 2014
– Model year trend continued with additional data years– Exemplar odds ratios:
• Object struck– Object vs. other vehicle
4.51 (4.35, 4.60)• Restraint
– Belted vs. unbelted 2.06 (1.96, 2.16)
Field Incidence – Nationally-Representative Crash Data
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 4
Pintar, F.A., et al. (2012) “Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures in Frontal Impact Crashes” Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, vol. 56, pp. 277-283.
Pintar, et al. [2012]
SAE INTERNATIONAL
• Doud, et al. [2015] reviewed multiple trauma databases – Trauma databases
• National Trauma Databank® (NTDB®) 2002-2006• National Inpatient Sample 1998-2007
– Crash database• NASS-CDS 2000-2011
– All three databases showed increases in crash-related thoracolumbar spine injuries despite decreasing rates of crash-related injuries overall –8-10% per year
– More sensitive screening tools likely not the main driver of increased incidence
– No consistent compensatory decreasing trends in sacropelvic injuries (trade-off)
Field Incidence – Nationally-Representative Trauma Data
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 5
Doud, A.N., et al. (2015) “Has the Incidence of Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries Increased in the United States From 1998-2011?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, v. 473, no. 1.
SAE INTERNATIONAL
• Incidence is low, but increasing– What are the mechanisms?– Are these trade-off injuries?– Are vehicle design changes responsible?
• Hypothesized mechanisms under consideration– Combination of lap belt and seat bottom interacting with pelvis– Straightening of lower spine curvature– Downward motion into seat structure
Motivation
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 6
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Research Approach – Identify Relevant Factors
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 7
Lower Spine Injury
in Frontal Crashes
Crash Characteristics
OccupantEnvironment
Occupant Biomechanics
SAE INTERNATIONAL
In-Depth Review of CIREN Cases
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 8
• In-depth case review to better understand variables and factors– Model year 2000 and newer– Row 1 occupants 16 years or older– Frontal impacts, primarily x-axis loading, no rollovers
• 82 case occupants with 102 spinal fractures– 96.3% belted– 58% female– L1 most common vertebra– Minor compression and burst
fractures most common
SAE INTERNATIONAL
In-Depth Review of CIREN Cases - Example
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 9
• 45 yo female driver– Belted– SW bag deployed
• 2001 Nissan Sentra– 12FDEW2, 41 km/h– V2: 1994 Camry
• L1 burst fracture– AIS 3– Unstable– Retropulsion of
fragments• Only other injury was
T12 spinous process fracture
SAE INTERNATIONAL
In-Depth Review of CIREN Cases - Example
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 10
• 57 yo male driver– Belted– SW bag deployed
• 2004 Toyota Tacoma– 12FCEN3, 45 km/h BES– Struck utility pole
• L5 minor comp fracture– AIS 2– Retropulsion of
fragments
• Also sustained thoracic and below-knee lower extremity fractures
SAE INTERNATIONAL
In-Depth Review of CIREN Cases
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 11
• Examined crash, vehicle, restraint, and occupant-related factors• For example, of 64 cases with BES ≤ 56 km/h:
– 57 cases demonstrated burst, minor compression, or wedge fractures– Only 5/57 were similar to NCAP full overlap crashes with engagement of
both longitudinal rails– 44/57 cases involved engagement of 0 or 1 longitudinal rails– Crash pulse differences may be crucial to generating injurious loading
conditions
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Research Approach – Relevant Factors
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 12
Lower Spine Injury
in Frontal Crashes
Crash Characteristics• Pulse• Direction of force• Non-horizontal
loading
Occupant Environment• Seat• Restraints• Knee bolster
Occupant Biomechanics• Positioning• Spinal alignment• Belt fit• Response/tolerance
Compression/burst more common than wedge fractures, suggesting a more pure compressive loading with adjacent endplates being
nearly parallel
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Seat Characterization
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 13
• Seat bottom was considered a relevant component for causation• Commenced CIREN research project to better understand seat
characteristics– Quasi-static response characterization
DeRosia, et al. 2013 (ESV)• Response of forward translation of
pelvis/thighs• Examination of bottom structure
– Dynamic evaluation on sled• Restraint factors• Pulse effects – full-frontal vs. pole impact• Dummy sensitivity to stiff vs. soft seats from quasi-static evaluation
Occupant Environment• Seat• Restraints• Knee bolster
Crash Characteristics• Pulse
DeRosia, J.J., Pintar, F.A., Halloway, D.E., Meyer, M.A., and Yoganandan, N. (2013) “Seat Pan Loading Differences Using a New Test Apparatus.” International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper number 13-0102.
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Seat Characterization
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 14
• Enhanced CIREN seat inspection– New photography and variables for structural components
• Pelvis support type (e.g. pan, spring basket)• Thigh support type (e.g. pan, bar)• Seat movement (e.g. manual, power)
– Identification of damage to seat bottom
Occupant Environment• Seat
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Computational Modeling
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 15
• GHBMC modeling efforts– Basic configuration
• Rigid seat• Simulated knee bolster• Belt pretensioner
– Validation against PMHS sled tests
– Limitations in model detail for lumbar spine
• Focus on kinematics
Occupant Biomechanics• Positioning• Spinal alignment
Occupant Environment• Restraints• Knee bolster
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Summary
This is a U.S. Government work and may be copied and distributed without permission. 16
• Increasing incidence of lower spine fracture in frontal crashes of restrained occupants
• CIREN case review identified crash, vehicle, occupant, and restraint factors
• Research underway– Laboratory and field investigation of seats
• Effects of structural differences on occupant response– Parametric studies on sled and with computational modeling
• Restraint and crash pulse factors– ATD response– Continued field data review