IOMOU MAGAZINE 2016-2017 - Maritime Cyprus · tion 69 clc prot1992 loadline tion 66 load line prot 88 solas 74 solas prot 78 solas prot 88 stcw 78 afs 2001 colreg 72 bankers convention

AAnnualReport2016

It is with great pleasure that I present the Annual Report of theIndian Ocean Memorandum of Understanding (IOMOU) for the year2016.

thThe IOMOU held its 19 port State control Committee meeting inKenya in August, 2016. During the meeting, the Committeeapproved the port State control (PSC) Guidelines for verification ofcompliance with SOLAS Chapter V, with regard to the carriage ofappropriate and up to date Nautical Charts and NauticalPublications. Further, in order to promote more effectiveimplementation of all applicable standards for maritime safety andpollution prevention, PSC Guidelines for the inspection of

Chairman's Message

Francois BEAUGRAND

Non-Convention ships and PSC Guidelines for the inspection of MODUs were also adopted. TheCommittee also deliberated on the New Inspection Regime (NIR) document prepared by the Secretariat,and members of the correspondence group are working on the same for future implementation.

During the year 2016, the IOMOU carried out the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on CargoSecuring Arrangements and reports are being analyzed. I am sure that the results of the analysis willhighlight the importance of the issue, and as such safety concerns in the area can be dealt with, by thestakeholders.

Substantial actions have been implemented in relation to the maritime safety and environmentprotection and these actions have contributed to the improvement of global standards. Pollution cantravel great distances in the marine environment, floating litter concentration in the Indian Ocean is agrowing concern. Increased attention is required to be paid to the issue of marine pollution in any formand we need to collectively work to address it, which is complicated by a variety of sources.

The IOMOU always strives for harmonization of practices and procedures and same is being achievedthrough cooperation with the other MoUs and the International Maritime Organization.

Some of the IOMOU member Authorities are still striving to achieve the target of inspection of 10% ofships visiting their ports, however the year 2016 did see an increase in the number of inspections. I amhopeful that the PSCOs and Maritime Administrations of the Member Authorities of the IOMOU willcontinue to put in their best effort to achieve the goal of eradicating sub-standard ships from our region.

In conclusion, I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the Secretariat, our Member States,Observers States and Observer Organization, to provide guidance when needed.

INDIAN OCEAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL

Foreword by the Secretary

Dilip Mehrotra

It gives me great pleasure to present the eighteenth Annual Report of the IndianstOcean Memorandum of Understanding (IOMOU) for the year ending 31

December 2016.

This annual report summarizes the port State control (PSC) performed by theIOMOU member Authorities based on the various ship types, flag States andRecognized Organizations. Apart from the general information, this reportprovides the outcome of the results of PSC inspections undertaken by individual

member Authority during the year, 2016. In addition, it also includes statistics and analysis on the resultsof inspections carried out by the member Authorities during the year 2016.

Revisions of the International regulations and new Conventions entering into force, pose a challenge forthe PSC authorities. Port State control officers (PSCOs) are required to be trained and updated with therequirements of the regulations. The IOMOU Secretariat was able to facilitate training to the PSCOs ofthe member Authorities, with the support of the Tokyo MoU and the International MaritimeOrganization.

During the year, the IOMOU conducted a seminar for the PSCOs from the Indian Ocean region, and alsoconducted an Expert Mission training wherein PSCOs apart from the IOMOU member Authorities, BlackSea MoU, Caribbean MoU, Mediterranean MoU, Riyadh MoU and Vina del Mar MoU also participated. Iwould like to specially thank Tokyo MoU for the conduct of Expert Mission and Australia, Chile and Japanfor providing the experts; I would also like to thank International Maritime Organization (IMO) forproviding financial support under the Technical Co-operation programme.

As part of the harmonization, co-operation and exchange of information, the IOMOU Secretariat isrepresented by the Secretary in the Sub-Committee meeting on the Implementation of IMO Instruments(III) and information on the developments over the past one year and report of analysis of ConcentratedInspection Campaigns is submitted.

The IOMOU Secretariat continued to serve its member Authorities well during the year. Let me take thisopportunity to thank members for their contribution and particularly the port State control officers of the region for their commitment and professionalism in conducting PSC activities in our region.

More information is available on the IOMOU web site: www.iomou.org


Table of Contents Page


51

53

13.

14.

15.


IntroductionGeneral

1

The Indian Ocean Memorandum of Understanding on port State control (PSC) in the IndianOcean region was finalized on the basis of the first preparatory meeting in India in October 1997 and thesecond meeting in June 1998 in South Africa. The second meeting was attended by Australia, Bangladesh,Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, India, Iran, Kenya, Maldives, Mauritius, Mozambique, Myanmar, Oman,Seychelles, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania and Yemen.

The port State control system aims to verify whether foreign flagged vessels calling at a port of a State,comply with applicable International Maritime Conventions. Each Authority ensures that foreignmerchant ships visiting its ports comply with the standards articulated in the relevant Conventions and allamendments thereto in force. In this context, a participating maritime authority regards a ship flying theflag of another member state as a foreign ship too. When vessels are found not to be in substantialcompliance with applicable regulations laws or relevant convention requirements, the PSC systemimposes actions to ensure they are brought into compliance. Ships to be inspected are selected on thebasis of targeting criteria outlined in the Memorandum and a non-discriminatory policy is observed.

Under the Memorandum, each Authority will establish and maintain an effective system of port Statecontrol regime. The mission of the IOMOU among maritime authorities responsible for port State controlin the Indian Ocean region is to promote the effective implementation of an improved and harmonizedsystem of port State control by uniform application, of relevant International Maritime Organization(IMO)/International Labour Organization (ILO) instruments on ships operating in the region.

This will be accomplished through the establishment and maintenance of a harmonized system of portState control by the member Authorities, and the effective operation of the Committee, the Secretariatand the IOCIS. Of particular importance are the cooperation and the exchange of information betweenmembers of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and with other regional port State controlregimes.

Following are the relevant instruments on which regional port State control is based:• The International Convention on Load Lines, 1966;

The International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74);The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by theProtocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL 73/78);The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping forSeafarers, 1978 (STCW 78);The Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972;The International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969;The Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (ILO Convention No. 147),The Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006)The International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships 2001The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunkers Pollution Damager, 2001 (BunkersConvention)Protocol of 1992 to amend the International convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage,1969 (CLC Protocol 1992).Together with the protocols and amendments to these conventions and related codes ofmandatory status as and when they enter in to force.

(IOMOU)

••

•

••••••

•


Members, Observers & Observers Organisation

2


MemberAuthorities

3


Contact Details:

4

The Secretariat of the Indian Ocean Memorandum of Understanding is based at Goa in India. TheSecretariat is governed by and accountable to the Committee of the IOMOU on port State control. Itservices the Committee meetings and assists the Committee in its activities.

The IOMOU Secretariat is headed by the Secretary, Mr. Dilip Mehrotra, assisted by Office Assistant Ms.Milan Sawant, Data Processor Mrs. Priyanka Sawant and Data Management Assistant Ms. Sushmita Naik.


The Committee

5

The Indian Ocean Memorandum of Understanding on port State control held its Nineteenth Committeeth thmeeting in Kenya, from 15 to 19 August, 2016. This meeting was hosted by the Ministry of Transport,

Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development in conjunction with the Kenya Maritime Authority.

Representatives from the following IOMOU member States and observers attended the meeting:

Australia, Bangladesh, France (Reunion Island), Islamic Republic of Iran, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Oman, South Africa and Sudan. The IOCIS Manager from the National Informatics

Centre (NIC) also attended the meeting.The member Authorities of Comoros, Eritrea, India, Maldives Sri Lanka and Yemen and the observers

of the Ethiopia, Madagascar, Black Sea MoU, Paris MoU, Riyadh MoU, Tokyo MoU, United States CoastGuard (USCG), International Labour Organisation (ILO), the International Maritime Organization (IMO),

and Equasis were not able to attend.Mr. Francois BEAUGRAND current Chair of the Committee, presided over the Committee meeting as

Chairman.


Detention Review Panel

6

Outcomes of the meeting included:

1 Approval of the following PSC Guidelines:

1.1 Verification of compliance with SOLAS Chapter V, with regard to the carriage of appropriate andup to date Nautical Charts and Nautical Publications.

1.2 Inspection of Non- Convention ships.1.3 Inspection of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODUs).

2 Questionnaire and Guidelines for the CIC on MARPOL Annex IV. Same will be used as and whenconducted in future.

3 The Committee reviewed the achievement status of the adopted Strategic Plan for the IOMOU forthe period 2013-18.

4 New Inspection Regime (NIR) document prepared by the Secretariat, and members of thecorrespondence group are working on the same for future implementation.

5 Agreed to conduct Concentrated Inspection Campaign for Safety of Navigation in 2017.

6 The Committee further noted that during the year 2016, the Secretariat had not received any caseof appeal for the detention review.

7 The Committee approved various additional codes for RO, Action taken, certificate anddeficiencies related to MLC 2006, 2014 amendments, Polar code and IGF code.

If Flag State, or their Recognised Organisations (ROs) acting on behalf of the flag State disagree withoutcome of the port State ruling, concerning a detention, either may request for a review by the IndianOcean MOU’s Detention Review Panel, within 90 days from the date of detention.

The Detention Review Panel is comprised of three Indian Ocean MOU member Authorities, excluding theport State and the vessels flag State and the ISM issuing country, if they are members of the Indian OceanMOU.

In the year 2016, the Secretariat did not received any appeal towards any detention.


Training And Seminars For Port State Control

7


8

PSCO from Kenya attended the Sixth Specialised Training Course (STC 6) organized by the Tokyo MOUth that Yokohama, Japan from 14 to 18 March 2016 , under IOMOU TC fund.

PSCO from South Africa, attended the IMO Sponsored Training Course on General Training Coursend thwith Tokyo MOU at Yokohama, Japan from 22 August to 16 September 2016, supported by IMO

and one PSCO from Sudan supported under IOMOU TC fund.

PSCO from Bangladesh, attended the IMO Sponsored Training Course on Human Element with Paristh thMOU from 04 to 07 October 2016, supported by IMO.

Trainings Sponsored by International Maritime Organization and under IOMOU TC fund for Capacity Building of the PSCOs


Port State Control Deficiencies

Funnel holed in several places

9


Co-operation With Other Regional MoUs

10

Considering the importance of inter-regional co-operation and harmonization, IOMOU participated inthe Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Cargo securing arrangements jointly with the TokyoMoU in, 2016. All the CIC inspections were recorded in the Indian Ocean Computerised InformationSystem (IOCIS) for the information of all interested parties. The Committee has decided to participatein other joint CIC as and when conducted by the Paris & Tokyo MoUs.

The IOMOU realized the need for this co-operation right from its inception and obtained the Observerstatus with the Tokyo MoU and later with the Paris MoU. It continues to maintain this status byattending their Committee meetings and other activities.

In a similar spirit the IOMOU has granted Observer status to the MoUs as indicated under the list ofObservers.

The representatives of the Secretariat attend other’s Committee meetings depending upon their ownprogrammes. This is in effect to benchmark and gives an opportunity to understand initiatives of otherMoUs on PSC. During the year the Secretary was invited to attend the following meetings:

Mediterranean MoUAbuja MoUTokyo MoURiyadh MoUParis MOU

In this regard the Secretary attended the following meeting for the year 2016:• Third session of the Sub-Committee on Implementation of IMO Instruments (III) held at IMO

th ndHeadquarters, London from 18 to 22 July 2016.th th th• 27 meeting of the Tokyo MoU Committee held in Hobart, Australia from 17 to 20 October

2016.th rd th• 49 meeting of Paris MoU Committee held in the Haugesund, Norway from 23 to 27 May

2016.


MonthJan-16Feb-16

Jun-16Jul-16

Aug-16Sep-16

Dec-16Total

Hits907265885634815840

1031913999718

1040150923667962272934290

1143403910435928615

11483202

Visits175281604315870145551472814182142941479414153147621477315875

181557

810923784286715076926922900986935781814475857707833362

1049104820837846061

10295520

9636490178903827598447001181712084163479694321

1017398883783218275493775076948543095201268

309675364

11

IOCIS and the IOMOU website are maintained by the National Informatics Centre, Government ofIndia. The Secretariat is in continuous contact with the Manager of the IOCIS. More enhancementsuch as uploading of supporting documents during PSC inspections, webservice between IOCIS andAPCIS, is being taken care of.

Following enhancement/modification has been made in the IOMOU website/ IOCIS:

1 Addition, deactivation and correction in various codes, as approved during the nineteenthmeeting.

2 Amendments in data validation rules.3 Hosting of performance statistics for various categories of ship inspection data on home page

of the website.4 Outstanding deficiency verification period increased from 6 to 24 months with effect from

01.01.2017.5 Implementation of NIR agreed in principal, further work in progress.6 Committee approved the migration of website to cloud. Work in progress.

Data exchange with Equasis, Information Handling System (IHS), Lloyds List (LLG) and the InternationalMaritime Organization (IMO) under GISIS is being carried out.

It is noted that the web-site http://www.iomou.org is visited by many to gather information on PSCinspections in the Indian Ocean region. The yearly statistical analysis of the use of the website is as given below:


Status of the Relevant Instruments

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Sr.No Authority

TONNAGECONVENTION 69

CLCPROT1992

LOADLINECONVENTION 66

LOAD LINE PROT

88SOLAS 74 SOLAS

PROT 78SOLAS

PROT 88 STCW 78 AFS 2001 COLREG 72BANKERS

CONVENTION2001

Australia

Bangladesh

Comoros

Eritrea

France

India

Iran

Kenya

Maldives

Mauritius

Mozambique

Oman

South Africa

Sri Lanka

Sudan

Tanzania

Yemen

21.05.1982

06.11.1981

22.11.2000

22.04.1996

31.10.1980

26.05.1977

28.12.1973

15.12.1992

02.06.1983

11.10.1988

30.10.1991

24.09.1990

24.11.1982

11.03.1992

21.05.2002

28.03.2001

06.03.1979

29.07.1968

10.05.1978

22.11.2000

22.04.1996

30.11.1966

19.04.1968

05.10.1973

12.09.1975

29.01.1968

11.10.1988

30.10.1991

20.08.1975

14.12.1966

10.05.1974

26.09.1991

28.02.1989

06.03.1979

07.02.1997

18.12.2002

_

04.02.2000

05.10.1990

10.08.2000

31.10.2006

07.07.2015

_

17.12.2002

_

17.06.1991

_

_

_

_

11.01.2012

17.08.1983

06.11.1981

22.11.2000

22.04.1996

25.05.1977

16.06.1976

17.10.1994

21.07.1999

14.01.1981

01.02.1988

23.12.1996

25.04.1985

23.05.1980

30.08.1983

15.05.1990

28.03.2001

06.03.1979

17.08.1983

-

22.11.2000

_

21.12.1979

03.04.1986

31.08.2000

_

_

_

25.04.1985

11.01.1982

_

_

_

_

07.02.1997

18.12.2002

_

04.02.2000

28.02.1992

22.08.2000

31.10.2006

20.05.2005

17.12.2002

_

17.06.1991

_

_

_

_

11.01.2012

07.11.1983

06.11.1981

22.11.2000

22.04.1996

11.07.1980

16.11.1984

01.08.1996

15.12.1992

22.01.1987

04.07.1991

15.11.1985

24.09.1990

27.07.1983

22.01.1987

26.02.1997

27.10.1982

14.02.2005

09.01.2007

_

_

_

12.03.2007

06.04.2011

_

_

_

_

02.07.2008

_

_

_

_

29.02.1980

10.05.1978

22.11.2000

22.04.1996

10.05.1974

30.05.1973

17.01.1989

15.12.1992

14.01.1981

26.05.1989

30.10.1991

25.04.1985

20.12.1976

04.01.1978

11.03.2003

16.05.2006

06.03.1979

_

_

_

19.10.2010

_

21.11.2011

07.07.2015

17.07.2013

_

_

_

_

_

_

09.10.1995

_

15.11.1999

24.10.2007

02.02.2000

20.05.2005

06.12.1999

08.07.1994

_

Entry in to force 18.07.1982 21.07.1968 03.02.2000 25.05.1980 01.05.1981 03.02.2000 28.04.1984 17.09.2008 15.07.1977

ILO 147/ MLC 2006*

21.12.2011

06.11.2014

_

_

02.05.1978/28.02.2013

11.06.2014

31.07.2014

07.10.2014

30.05.2014

_

_

20.06.2013

_

_

_

_

28.11.1981/20.08.2013

16.03.2009

07.07.2015 07.07.2015 07.07.2015

24.04.2015

_

_

21.11.2008

_

15.01.2000

29.09.1994

26.04.2002

01.10.2004

22.01.1999

19.11.2002

20.09.2006

30.05.1996

26.09.1996/09.10.2015

12* MLC 2006 will supersede ILO 147 if the Authority ratified both of them


Sr. No Annex VI Authority Annex I & II Annex III Annex IV Annex V

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Australia

Bangladesh

Comoros

Eritrea

France

India

Iran

Kenya

Maldives

Mauritius

Mozambique

Oman

South Africa

Sri Lanka

Sudan

Tanzania

Yemen

14.10.1987

18.12.2002

22.11.2000

__

25.09.1981

24.09.1986

25.10.2002

15.12.1992

20.05.2005

06.04.1995

09.11.2005

13.03.1984

28.11.1984

24.06.1997

__

23.07.2008

__

10.10.1994

18.12.2002

22.11.2000

__

25.09.1981

11.06.2003

29.05.2009

15.12.1992

__

06.04.1995

09.11.2005

13.03.1984

05.02.1997

24.06.1997

23.07.2008

__

27.02.2004

18.12.2002

22.11.2000

__

25.09.1981

11.06.2003

29.05.2009

15.12.1992

__

06.04.1995

09.11.2005

13.03.1984

24.06.1997

23.07.2008

__

14.08.1990

18.12.2002

22.11.2000

__

25.09.1981

11.06.2003

25.10.2002

15.12.1992

20.05.2005

06.04.1995

09.11.2005

13.03.1984

13.05.1992

24.06.1997

23.07.2008

__

07.08.2007

18.12.2002

__

__

15.07.2005

23.11.2011

29.05.2009

14.01.2008

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

Entry in to force 02.10.1983 01.07.1992 27.09.2003 31.12.1988 19.05.2005

17.09.2015 17.09.2015

21.01.2015 21.01.2015 21.01.2015

13


Statistics

14

A total of 6010 inspections were carried out in 2016. Out of these 6010 inspections, 3393 inspections haddeficiencies and the total numbers of deficiencies were 14830.

Serious deficiencies noted by the PSCOs led to the detention of 370 ships and needs to be rectified priorto the ships departure; the overall detention percentage for the year was 6.16 %. There was decrease intotal number of inspections in 2016, compared with those in 2015 whereas, the detention percentageincreased from 5.59 % recorded in 2015.

The average number of deficiencies per inspection in 2016 (2.46) has slightly increased compared to theprevious year (2.38).

The information given in the following tables and charts represents the port State control activities ofAustralia, Bangladesh, France, India, Iran, Kenya, Maldives, Mauritius, Oman, Sri Lanka, South Africa,Sudan, & Yemen. The rest of the member Authorities are trying to overcome the challenges in carryingout their PSC Inspection activities.

It should be noted that Australia, is a member of both the Tokyo MoU and the Indian Ocean MOU. SouthAfrica is a member of the Abuja MoU and Indian Ocean MOU, Oman is the member of Riyadh MoU andthe Indian Ocean MOU. Each record their PSC data with both MoUs and so when considering a world

1picture of statistics, this duplication of data should be taken into account .

A joint CIC on Cargo Securing Arrangements was held jointly with the Tokyo MoUs in 2016. Theconsolidated report on CIC activities in the Indian Ocean region is provided in this Annual Report.


Port State Control Inspection Activities

Authority Number of Inspections

Number of Inspections

withdeficiencies

Number of Deficiencies

Number of Detentions

DetentionPercentage

1Australia

Bangladesh

France

India

Iran

Kenya

Maldives

Mauritius

1Oman

1South Africa

Sri Lanka

Total

3675

136

48

548

742

499

4

2

130

217

9

6010

2123

133

20

433

494

82

3

0

53

43

9

3393

8940

486

109

1805

2812

252

18

0

160

175

73

14830

245

1

2

19

94

11

0

0

0

0

2

370

6.67

0.74

4.17

3.47

12.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

3.23

22.22

6.16

15


Table: 1.

DEFICIENCIES BY TYPE OF SHIP

Type of ShipNumber

ofInspections


withDeficiencies



DetentionPercentage

Percentage of Inspections

withDeficiencies

* Earlier known to be Tanker not otherwise specified.

Bulk CarrierChemical TankerContainer ShipGas CarrierGeneral Cargo / Multipurpose shipHeavy Load CarrierHigh Speed Passenger CraftLivestock CarrierNLS Tanker *Offshore Service VesselOil TankerOther Types of ShipPassenger ShipRefrigerated Cargo CarrierRo-Ro Cargo ShipSpecial Purpose ShipTugboatVehicle CarrierWoodchip Carrier

3078519657128423

271

572859

449345735221848

28783

1853273340

61266

121

341444

2142028131610419657

772310551393

2061482

888

15133

4891110

10181496451

240287219

1802825

642

3033

2035

21012973

5.855.393.814.699.93

11.110.005.26

10.7133.90

7.805.881.750.004.55

11.1118.75

2.443.61

60.252.6

51.7547.6662.8844.44

100.0059.6550.0074.5847.6658.8249.1237.1472.7355.5685.4233.4568.67

6010 3393 14830 370Total

16


Table: 2.

DEFICIENCIES BY FLAG

FlagNumber

ofInspections


withDeficiencies



DetentionPercentage

Antigua and BarbudaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBermuda (UK)BrazilCayman Islands (UK)ChinaComorosCook IslandsCroatiaCyprusDenmarkEgyptFranceFijiFaroe IslandsGermanyGibraltar (UK)GeorgiaGreeceHong Kong, ChinaIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsle of Man (UK)ItalyJapanJamaicaJordanKiribatiKorea, Republic ofKuwaitLiberiaLuxembourgLibyaMalaysiaMaltaMaldives

5.324.150.000.000.00

26.673.450.000.001.71

14.2918.1842.86

5.790.000.006.670.000.000.000.000.005.364.439.09

11.110.000.001.675.134.000.00

50.000.006.330.004.720.00

50.000.004.80

50.00

59000410021237001000006

28310012301050

29010

171

250287

300

1199481031

197326836

29763

215

54

1338

5243

1251117

2916

16478

114464

2015

1331251027

78118

5885

704

1515

11157

695

7520

16114

111

56333

21541

202037

121

522

321726

2012

94217

729

1529

132

1177

117

12135

115

21

1318

1112632

33971

603975

121

796

61513

213

3542

17


Table: 2 (Contd.)

DEFICIENCIES BY FLAG

FlagNumber

ofInspections


withDeficiencies



DetentionPercentage

Total

Marshall IslandsMauritiusMongoliaMontenegroMadagascarNetherlandsNew ZealandNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaPhilippinesPortugalRussian FederationSaint Kitts and NevisSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSaudi ArabiaSolomon IslandsSierra LeoneSingaporeSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandSouth AfricaSpainTaiwan, ChinaTanzaniaThailandTogoTurkeyTuvaluUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesVanuatuViet Nam

5851111

263

7212

291527

93436

11936

432

5814

1515

11

191815132315

335

89

31

3181101

113

3511

25956

92419

11929

232

29035

1001

1517

9111510

219

45

29

12227

380

2046

7135

86

2044426

103114

821

236145

41637

1121261136

05

98297

5992394317621228

161

330101203006

1215110

115002

18100004

10441011010

5.640.00

100.000.00

100.007.690.004.170.000.00

20.697.92

55.562.942.780.00

57.8913.89

0.000.00

100.003.10

25.000.000.000.000.00

21.0555.5626.6730.77

4.850.00

33.332.860.00

11.110.00

6010 3393 14830 370

18


Table: 3.

DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORIES

Code Nature of Deficiencies Number of Deficiencies Percentage

Total 14830

011012013021031041051061071081091092101111121131141142143144145146147151161181182183184991

3.141.714.133.325.935.143.531.69

13.220.821.094.31

15.6210.58

0.165.462.200.010.012.021.170.790.014.360.460.031.122.144.471.36

466253613492880762524251

1961121161639

23171569

23809327

21

299174117

1646

685

166318663202

Certificate & Documentation - Ship CertificatesCertificate & Documentation - Crew CertificatesCertificate & Documentation – DocumentsStructural ConditionsWater/Weathertight conditionsEmergency SystemsRadio CommunicationsCargo operations including equipmentFire safetyAlarmsLiving ConditionsWorking ConditionsSafety of NavigationLife saving appliancesDangerous goodsPropulsion and auxiliary machineryPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IIPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IIIPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IVPollution prevention - Marpol Annex VPollution prevention - Marpol Annex VIPollution Prevention – Anti FoulingISMISPSMinimum requirements for seafarersLabour Conditions - Conditions of employmentAccommodation recreational facilities F and CHealth protection, medical care, social securityOther

19


Table: 4DEFICIENCIES BY RECOGNISED ORGANISATION

Note* Inspection classed with Scandinavi Register of Shipping, Zanzibar Maritime Authority, Intertek Maritime Bureau,Carona Corporation, Qualitas Register of Shipping, Worldwide Register of Shipping, Maritimes Cert of Shipping, VR_DNV.GL etc.are included in this RO.

Recognised OrganisationNumber of

OverallInspections


withDeficiencies

Number of overall

Deficiencies

OverallDetention

%

Number of RO

ResponsibleDetentions

Total 6010 370 50

American Bureau of ShippingAmerican Register of ShippingBureau VeritasChina Classification SocietyColumbus American RegisterConarina Llc CR Classification SocietyCroatian Register of Shipping DNV GL ASDromon Bureau of ShippingIndian Register of Shipping Indonesian Classification BureauInspeccion y Classificacion Maritima International Maritime RegisterInternational Naval Surveys BureauInternational Register of Shipping International Ship ClassificationIranian Classification SocietyIsthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.AKorean Register of Shipping Lloyd's RegisterMacosnar CorporationNational Shipping Adjusters Inc. Nippon Kaiji KyokaiNo Class Novel Classification Society S.A.Other *Overseas Marine Certification Services, Inc. Panama Maritime Documentation ServicesPhoenix Register of Shipping S.A.Polski Rejestr StatkowRussian Maritime Register of Shipping RINA Services S.p.A.Shipping Register of UkraineSingClass International Pte Ltd.Viet Nam Register

6282

693317

1164

9493

311119

26142

351770

44

198571

17771

129

13211

21

3102

424168

1153

4862

220118

26111

208392

41

117451

15771

118

7511

19

372

4291012

49250105

12001

1829

31

123108410308110

5.89100.00

6.062.84

100.000.00

16.6750.00

5.1666.6716.13

0.00100.00

0.0055.5646.15

0.000.00

50.005.133.77

75.0025.00

6.2014.29

0.0047.0657.1414.29

0.0025.00

0.006.06

100.00100.00

0.00

128000016110002100022318004220101010

0.16100.00

1.150.000.000.000.00

25.000.63

33.333.230.000.000.00

22.223.850.000.000.000.570.26

75.0025.00

0.400.000.00

23.5328.5728.57

0.008.330.000.760.00

100.000.00

13

13000016110002400062

131

18005580101030

3393 95

20


Table: 5

COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS AND DEFICIENCIES PER SHIP TYPE

Type of ShipNumber of Inspections Number of Inspections

with Deficiencies 3-yearaverage

percentage

Total

Year2014 Total20162015

Year2014 2015 2016 Total

* Earlier known to be Tanker not otherwise specified.

6059 6253 6010 18322 3469 3372 3393 10234 55.86

3188334

3731

80539

552

733

2662

3625644329810

891

20557

3401377

0664119470

480

527

2463

33938574438

12192

32573

1936162

1331

34387

342

641

1332

14243291327

56

66100

41

1939181

0339

45290

230

335

1433

13725372025

11157

10849

59.2550.0833.3349.2242.8165.8553.08

100.0071.9860.0052.5659.2442.8768.7559.4941.4443.0454.5557.45

7137.2169.01

3078519

0657128423

271

570

2859

44934573522

01848

28783

96671230

32052

3271432

1303

1821078

1841150

128158111158

1147

231817213

1853273

0340

61266

121

340

1444

21420281316

010419657

5728616

11010

140943

693

1316

41109493

88944668

627

164304147

Bulk CarrierChemical TankerCombination CarrierContainer ShipGas CarrierGeneral Cargo / Multipurpose ShipHeavy Load CarrierHigh Speed Passenger CraftLivestock CarrierMODU & FPSONLS Tanker*Offshore Service VesselOil TankerOther Type of ShipPassenger ShipRefrigerated Cargo VesselRo-Ro Cargo ShipRo-Ro Passenger ShipSpecial Purpose ShipTugboatVehicle CarrierWoodchip Carrier

21


Table: 6

COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS AND DETENTIONS PER SHIP TYPE

Type of ShipNumber of Inspections Number of Detentions 3-year

averagepercentage

Total

Year2014 Total20162015

Year2014 2015 2016 Total

* Earlier known to be Tanker Not Otherwise Specified.

6059 6253 6010 18322 379 349 370 1098 5.99

3188334

3731

80539

552

733

26362

625644329810

891

20557

3401377

0664119470

480

527

24339

6338574438

12192

32573

19110

038

361

40711

137

1131500

1292

16814

043

439

30423

2314

312203696

5.584.230.005.173.989.927.690.007.69

30.008.976.17

22.2812.50

3.162.705.060.00

10.6411.69

3.065.16

3078519

0657128423

271

570

28449

5934573522

01848

28783

96671230

32052

3271432

1303

1821078

1150184128158111158

1147

231817213

18028

025

642

30303

3520

210102973

53952

0106

13142

100

1437

714116

53805

272511

Bulk CarrierChemical TankerCombination CarrierContainer ShipGas CarrierGeneral Cargo / Multipurpose ShipHeavy Load CarrierHigh Speed Passenger CraftLivestock CarrierMODU & FPSONLS Tanker*Oil TankerOffshore service VesselOther Types of ShipPassenger ShipRefrigerated Cargo VesselRo-Ro Cargo ShipRo-Ro Passenger ShipSpecial Purpose ShipTugboatVehicle CarrierWoodchip Carrier

22


Table: 7

COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS AND DETENTIONS PER FLAG

FlagNumber of Inspections Number of Detentions 3-year

averagepercentageYear

2014 Total20162015Year

2014 2015 2016 Total

Antigua and BarbudaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBermuda (UK)BoliviaBrazilCambodiaCayman Islands (UK)ChinaComorosCongo, Democratic Rep. ofCook IslandsCroatiaCuracao (NL)*CyprusDenmarkDominicaEgyptEstoniaEthiopiaFaroe IslandsFijiFranceGermanyGeorgiaGibraltar (UK)GreeceHong Kong, ChinaHondurasIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandIsle of Man (UK)IsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordan

126198

1997

1916

204

31157

20953

13134

4823005

120

25101669

12117

90

860

401

734

125218

85

118

31003

35153

71

1154

13631

201200660

22110699

0241510

077

243

089

0

94217

729

1529

010

32117

70

1170

12135

010012

1513

118

112632

033

971

600

391

752

345633

3416274276

217

98427

161

3117

7388100

693512

2631

165

3232000

1784126

1223

2122

2237

6

1712

620400010200100

1012110000000

1122

11

1020201121

1572003000123213009000000000024

3002400203020

590004100002102307000000010006

2803100102031

3728

820

1110022731630

2612110001002

2180

16

1520506172

10.724.42

23.5312.50

0.0026.19

1.320.000.00

28.572.041.64

18.75100.00

19.3517.65

0.006.701.00

33.3311.1133.33

0.000.000.003.850.000.003.086.504.00

100.007.69

36.597.690.002.240.004.92

50.002.95

33.33

23* Flag Netherlands Antilles changed to Curacao with effect from 10.10.2010.


Table: 7 (Contd.)





2014 2015 2016 Total

KiribatiKorea, Democratic People's RepublicKorea, Republic ofKuwaitLiberiaLibyaLithuaniaLuxembourgMadagascarMalaysiaMaldivesMaltaMarshall IslandsMauritiusMoldovaMongoliaMontenegroMyanmarNetherlandsNew ZealandNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPanamaPapua New GuineaPhilippinesPortugalQatarRussian FederationSaint Kitts and NevisSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSaudi ArabiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSolomon IslandsSouth Africa

13

885

65211

120

192

302517

48412

462

76013

14928

509307

462

149

56200

10

1177

6040220

111

310575

11501

477

81015

15688

4417

12

1144

173

62840

10

796

61520

131

132

354585

10110

263

7212

291527

93436

01

1936

042

58131

33

28418

187133

271

435

9661677

69

1023

11912

22914

374587

25128

6243

37126

32514

177171

0040

38001021

1521

02200002002

1092311042004

2300

00

130

45000001

2020

01100010013

911100075110

2210

0050

29100101

1733

00100203006

12151100

115002

1800

00

220

112101123

5274

0340021501

11321

85210

2212

116

6310

0.000.007.750.005.99

33.330.003.70

100.004.65

60.005.384.410.00

33.3340.00

0.000.001.688.332.180.00

25.0029.73

732.00

3.913.23

25.000.00

59.469.52

33.334.00

42.863.56

14.290.00

24


Table: 7 (Contd.)





2014 2015 2016 Total

SpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwan, ChinaTanzaniaThailandTunisiaTogoTongaTurkeyTuvaluUnited Arab Emirates (UAE)United KingdomUnited StatesVanuatuViet Nam

019

13141919

017

22617

443132136

03

121224

519

150

2113

342151447

14

1515191815

013

02315

335

89

31

18

3640574253

135

2704510

1203644

114

01110700101313025

00000210100011109

01004

1040401011010

02114

195060233513

14

0.0025.00

2.782.507.02

45.249.430.00

17.140.002.866.67

30.004.172.786.82

12.28

Total 6059 6253 6010 18322 379 349 370 1098

25


Table: 8

COMPARISON OF DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORIES

Nature of Deficiencies2014 2015 2016

Total 16856 14907 14830

Number of DeficienciesYEARCode

011012013021031041051061071081091092101111121131141142143144145146147151161181182183184991

Certificate & Documentation - Ship CertificatesCertificate & Documentation - Crew CertificatesCertificate & Documentation – DocumentsStructural ConditionsWater/Weathertight conditionsEmergency SystemsRadio CommunicationsCargo operations including equipmentFire safetyAlarmsLiving ConditionsWorking ConditionsSafety of NavigationLife saving appliancesDangerous goodsPropulsion and auxiliary machineryPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IIPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IIIPollution prevention - Marpol Annex IVPollution prevention - Marpol Annex VPollution prevention - Marpol Annex VIPollution prevention – Anti FoulingISMISPSMinimum requirements for seafarersLabour Conditions - Conditions of employmentAccommodation recreational facilities F and CHealth protection, medical care, social securityOther

415324831453888878665201

2474139167916

26261710

20801283

010

293204110

0766

8231

188563533285

356243709479778846529193

2057135128629

22551493

43737368

00

319197

841

630114

17210483700174

466253613492880762524251

1961121161639

23171569

23809327

21

299174117

1646

685

166318663202

26


Table: 9

COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS AND DEFICIENCIES PER RECOGNISED ORGANISATION

Recognised OrganisationNumber of Inspections Number of Inspection with

Deficiencies 3-yearaverage

percentageYear2014 Total20162015

Year2014 2015 2016 Total

American Bureau of Shipping American Register of ShippingAsia Classification SocietyBureau VeritasCaspian Register of Shipping China Classification SocietyCR Classification SocietyColumbus American RegisterCroatian Register of Shipping Conarina LlcDNV GL ASDromon Bureau of Shipping Global Marine Bureau Inc. Indian Register of Shipping Indonesia Classification BureauInspeccion y Classificacion Maritima Intermaritime Certification Services S.A.International Naval Surveys BureauInternational Register of Shipping International Ship ClassificationInternational Maritime RegisterIranian Classification SocietyIsthmus Bureau of Shipping ,S.AKorea Classification SocietyKorean Register of ShippingLloyd s RegisterMacosnar Corporation SocietyMaritime Bureau of ShippingMaritime Lloyd Ltd., GeorgiaNational Shipping Adjusters IncNippon Kaiji KyokaiNovel Classification Society S.A.No Class Overseas Marine Certification Service , Inc.Panama Maritime Documentation ServicesPanama Register CorporationPhoenix Register of Shipping S. A.Polski Rejestr StatkowRussian Maritime Register of ShippingRINA Services S.p.A.

60232

6583

3676230

113010

018

2019

1400533

337770

1711

18580313117

15155

64032

6520

3766060

106013

181017910710

391803

0201

20500

14432298

131

31712

4180

2024110

57370

112016

1300333

199436

1611

109702130165

88

31722

3680

1844030

55403

131005910310

204390

0201

11520

12431273

86

50.4862.50

100.0060.41

0.0052.2672.2266.6753.85

100.0051.3864.29

100.0068.6675.00

100.0050.0076.0097.96

100.00100.00

43.7583.33

100.0056.6351.98

100.0088.89

100.0050.0058.09

100.0079.17

100.00100.00

33.33100.00

85.7150.0059.57

62820

6930

3176141

94930

311109

2611420

351770

4004

1985177701

129

132

187084

20033

106018

313

13139

143

67412

2549

21

1663

10792343

5916

58931

241213

34

2832

418

31020

4240

1685131

48620

220108

2611110

208392

4001

1174157701

118

75

94454

12100

55413

271

161393

46311

1948

21753

6111218

5813

34231

191213

14

2416

249

27



Recognised OrganisationNumber of Inspections Number of Inspection with

Deficiencies 3-yearaverage

percentageYear2014 Total20162015

Year2014 2015 2016 Total

10112

3418

0

00210

3231

10102

3416

0

00110

3021

100.00100.00

75.0050.00

100.0095.4086.84

100.00

01100

2117

0

11422

8738

1

01100

1915

0

11312

8333

16059 6253 6010 18322 3469 3372 3393 10234

28


Table: 10

COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS AND DETENTIONS PER RECOGNISED ORGANISATION

Recognised OrganisationNumber of Inspections Number of Detentions 3-year


Total20162015Year

2014 2015 2016 Total

American Bureau of ShippingAmerican Register of ShippingAsia Classification SocietyBureau VeritasCaspian Register of Shipping China Classification SocietyCR Classification SocietyColumbus American RegisterConarina LlcCroatian Register of ShippingDNV GL ASDromon Bureau of ShippingGlobal Marine Bureau Inc.Indian Register of ShippingInspeccion y Classificacion MaritimaIntermaritime Certification Services S.A.International Register of Shipping International Maritime RegisterInternational Naval Surveys BureauInternational Ship ClassificationIranian Classification SocietyIndonesian Classification BureauIsthmus Bureau of Shipping ,S.AKorea Classification SocietyKorean Register of ShippingLloyd s RegisterMacosnar CorporationMaritime Bureau of ShippingMaritime Lloyd Ltd., GeorgiaNational Shipping Adjusters Inc Nippon Kaiji KyokaiOverseas Marine Certification Service,Inc.Panama Maritime Documentation ServicesPanama Register CorporationPhoenix Register of Shipping S. A.Polski Rejestr StatkowRussian Maritime Register of ShippingRINA Services S.p.A (RINA)Ship Classification Society of MalaysiaSing Class International Pte Ltd.

60232

6583

3676203

113010

018

01

140905233

337770

1711

185813117

15155

11

64032

6520

3766006

106013

180190717110

391803

0201

2050432298

13102

2702

490

120000

781020180200110

1540

1201

108130101

1001

2810

39090000

690220070200000

1928

0200

110030250701

4.9237.5050.00

6.490.002.835.56

33.330.00

15.386.24

21.4366.6713.43

100.0050.0055.10

0.0036.00

0.000.00

25.0033.33

0.004.824.14

80.0044.44

0.0033.33

5.7941.6753.85

0.0075.0028.57

3.135.980.00

75.00

62820

6930

3176114

94930

3110

261914120

351770

4004

19857701

129

13201

187084

20033

106018

31

133139

143

6712

491

252

16463

10792343

5916

58931213

34

2832

41814

3720

42091102

4920510

120500010

1829

3001

123410030801

9232

1300

301102

19632911

270900120

5297

4402

341570381

2503

2014

29


Table: 10 (Contd.)


Number of Inspections Number of Detentions 3-yearaverage

percentageYear Year2014 2015 2016 Total

Shipping Register of UkraineTurkish LloydVenezuelan Register of ShippingViet Nam RegisterNo ClassNovel Classification Society S.A.OtherWithdrawn

Recognised Organisation

012

3430

180

010

3214

031

00051050

00065011

100.000.000.00

12.6429.17

0.0036.84

100.00

100

2171

170

122

8724

138

1

10001080

100

1170

141

2014 2015 2016 Total

6059 6253 6010 18322 379 349 370 1098Total

30


Inspection Efforts

TOTAL INSPECTIONS: 6010

Fig. 1.

South Africa 2174%

India 5489%

Australia 367561%

Oman 1302%

Kenya 4998%

Mauritius 2

Iran 74212%

Maldives 4

France 4814%

Bangladesh 1362%

31


Type of Ship Inspected

Fig. 2.

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS 20 INSPECTIONS AND ABOVE/ SHIP TYPE

Bulk Carriers 307851%

Container Ship 65711%

ChemicalTanker 519

9%

NLS Tankers 28

Passenger Ship 571%

Oil Tanker 4497%

Gas Carrier 1282%

Livestock Carrier 571%

Other type of ship 341%

Heavy Load Carrier 27

Tugboat 481%

32


Fig. 3

Percentage of Ship Type with Deficiences


33


Percentage of Detention per Ship TypeFig. 4


34


Percentage of Deficiency Per Flag

Marshall Islands8.24

Maldives5.27

Liberia8.98

Bahamas1.94

Japan0.72

Signapore628

China1.33

Panama29.84

Fig. 5

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS 75 INSPECTIONS AND ABOVE / FLAG

Greece1.64

Cyprus2

Norway 81

35


Percentage of Detentions per Flag

Fig. 6

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS 75 INSPECTIONS AND ABOVE/FLAG

36


Deficiency Percentage by Categories

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS DEFICIENCIES PERCENTAGE 1.5 AND ABOVE

Fig. 7

37


Detention Percentage by Recognised Organisation

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS INSPECTIONS OF 10 SHIPS AND ABOVE/RECOGNISED ORGANISATION

Fig. 8

38


Comparison of Inspections per Ship Type

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS 30 INSPECTIONS AND ABOVE EITHER FOR 2014, 2015 or 2016 / SHIP TYPE

Fig. 9

39


Comparison of Detentions per Ship Type

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS 30 INSPECTIONSAND ABOVE EITHER FOR 2014, 2015 or 2016 / SHIP TYPE

Fig. 10

40


Summary of 3-year Inspections with Deficiences per Ship Type

% OVER (+) OR UNDER (-) AVERAGE

Fig. 11

Chemical tanker

Container ship

Ro-Ro Cargo Ship

Oil Tanker

Gas carrier

Refrigerated Cargo Vessel

Vehicle Carrier

Tugboat

Woodchip Carrier

Other types of ship

General Cargo/ Multipurpose ship

Passenger ship

Bulk Carrier

Offshore Service Vessel

Heavy load carrier

41


Comparison of Detentions per Flag

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS DETENTIONS OF 10 AND ABOVE EITHER FOR 2014, 2015 or 2016/ FLAG

Fig. 12

42


Summary of 3 Year Detention Percentage Per Flag

% OVER (+) OR UNDER (-) AVERAGE

Fig. 13

Tanzania

Indonesia

Antigua and Barbuda

Panama

Cyprus

Greece

Malta

Liberia

Bahamas

Marshall Islands

Hong Kong China

Singapore

43


Comparison of Deficiences by Categories

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS DEFICIENCIES OF 100AND ABOVE EITHER FOR 2014, 2015 or 2016

Fig. 14

44


Comparison of Inspections per Recognised Organisation

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS INSPECTIONS OF 40 SHIPS AND ABOVE EITHER FOR 2014, 2015 or 2016

Fig. 15

45


Comparison of Detentions per Recognised Organisation

THIS GRAPH DEPICTS DETENTIONS OF 5 ANDABOVE EITHER FOR 2014, 2015 or 2016

Fig. 16

46


List of Underperforming Ships for the year 2016

Ship Name Flag CompanyNumber

7614707 2014-10-19 0000001

7614707 2016-04-10 9991001

7614707 2016-09-17 5621961

1

47



7903299 2015-09-13 0000001

7903299 2016-08-22 1276258 01315 - Oil record book

2

7903299 2016-02-06 1276258

3 7911818 2015-09-03 5480887

48



3 7911818 2016-03-05 5480887

7911818

8013168

8013168

2016-12-12

2015-06-09

2015-11-10

9991001

9991001

0000001

4

49



8013168 2016-10-16 5700690

8912900 2014-09-08 Indonesia 0313623

9313620

9314923

9313620

9314923

9313620

9314923

9313620

2014-01-06

2014-03-18

2014-07-10

2014-09-18

2015-09-14

2015-06-22

2016-01-26

Indonesia

Indonesia

Indonesia

Indonesia

5661158

0104949

5661158

0104949

0650367

0104949

5661158

5

6

7

8912900 2014-12-04 Indonesia 0313623

8912900 2015-01-28 Indonesia 0313623

50


THE REPORT OF CIC ON CARGO SECURING ARRANGEMENTS

Name of reporting Authority






Total number of inspection






Total number of deficiencies






Total number of detention






AUSTRALIA553181

BANGLADESH2251

FRANCE1200

IRAN81131

OMAN1100

SOUTH AFRICA5110

51


Total number of inspectionTotal number of deficienciesTotal number of detention

All Reporting Authorities

869393

52


Republic of Mauritius

53


54


This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source but not for commercial use or sale.

Further Information may be obtained from:

IOMOU Secretariat,Ushakal, House No. 92, Plot No. A-8,Rangavi Estate, Dabolim GOA - 403 801.INDIA.Tel.: +91 832 2538 128/2538 398Fax: +91 832 2538 127

This report is also available at IOMOU websitewww.iomou.org