IPL. MAR3 1 2011 - NRC

0IPL. MAR3 1 2011POWERING TODAY. L-2011-081EMPOWERING TOMORROW.L

1

10 CFR 50.90

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Document Control DeskWashington, D. C. 20555-0001

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251Response to NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI) Regarding ExtendedPower Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request (LAR) No. 205 and ElectricalEngineering Branch Issues

References:

(1) M. Kiley (FPL) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (L-2010-113), "LicenseAmendment Request No. 205: Extended Power Uprate (EPU)," (TAC Nos. ME4907 andME4908), Accession No. ML 103560169, October 21, 2010.

(2) Email from J. Paige (NRC) to T. Abbatiello (FPL), "Turkey Point EPU - ElectricalEngineering Branch (EEEB) Request for Additional Information - Round 1," AccessionNo. ML110610719, March 2, 2011.

By letter L-2010-113 dated October 21, 2010 [Reference 1], Florida Power and Light (FPL)requested to amend Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 and DPR-41 and revise the TurkeyPoint Units 3 and 4 Technical Specifications (TS). The proposed amendment will increase eachunit's licensed core power level from 2300 megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt and revisethe Renewed Facility Operating Licenses and TS to support operation at this increased corethermal power level. This represents an approximate increase of 15% and is thereforeconsidered an extended power uprate (EPU).

By email from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Project Manager (PM) datedMarch 2, 2011 [Reference 2], additional information was requested by the NRC staff in theElectrical Engineering Branch (EEEB) to support the review of the EPU LAR. The RAI consistedof fourteen (14) questions regarding the electrical engineering section of the LAR Attachment 4,Licensing Report. These RAI questions and the applicable FPL responses are documented in theAttachment 1 to this letter. Attachment 2 contains a revised Generation Interconnection ServiceSystem Impact Study that supports the response to RAI 1-6.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91(b)(1), a copy of this letter is being forwarded to the StateDesignee of Florida.

This submittal does not alter the significant hazards consideration or environmental assessmentpreviously submitted by FPL letter L-2010-113 [Reference 1].

This submittal contains no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.

Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Ms. Olga Hanek, ActingLicensing Manager, at (305) 246-6607.

an FPL Group company

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 L-2011-081Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Page 2 of 2

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on March 3 (,2011.

Very truly yours,

Michael KileySite Vice PresidentTurkey Point Nuclear Plant

Attachments (2)

cc: USNRC Regional Administrator, Region IIUSNRC Project Manager, Turkey Point Nuclear PlantUSNRC Resident Inspector, Turkey Point Nuclear PlantMr. W. A. Passetti, Florida Department of Health

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251

L-2011-081Attachment IPage I of 22

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

RESPONSE TO NRC RAI REGARDING EPU LAR NO. 205AND EEEB ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH ISSUES

ATTACHMENT 1

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 L-201 1-081Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Attachment 1

Page 2 of 22

Response to Request for Additional Information

The following information is provided by Florida Power & Light (FPL) in response to the U. S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Request for Additional Information (RAI). Thisinformation was requested to support the review of License Amendment Request (LAR) No. 205,Extended Power Uprate (EPU), for Turkey Point Nuclear Plant (PTN) Units 3 and 4 that wassubmitted to the NRC by FPL letter L-2010-113 on October 21, 2010 [Reference 1].

In an email dated March 2, 2011 [Reference 2], the NRC staff requested additional informationregarding FPL's request to implement the Extended Power Uprate. The RAI consisted offourteen (14) questions from the NRC Electrical Engineering Branch (EEEB). These RAIquestions and the applicable FPL responses are documented below.

EEEB-1.1Regarding Section 2.3.1.2.3.1 of Attachment 4 of the license amendment request (LAR)dated October 21, 2010:

a. Explain the basis for the following statement: "Pressure effects are generallystress-related rather than age related."Aging effects on non-metallic materials are typically caused by prolonged exposure totemperature and radiation or, in the case of loss of material, through excessive wear; theseare all considered age-related where the non-metallic material exhibits signs of drying,cracking, embrittlement and loss of material (wear aging). Each are clearly defined in theInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) STD 323, "Standard for QualifyingClass 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" [Reference 3], as well as10 CFR 50.49. Pressure is a stress-related effect, such as compression which unlikeradiation, temperature and wear aging is more of a forcing function which can drive moistureinto (or out of) an object/equipment. Pressure effects unto themselves have never beenconsidered a detrimental qualification aging mechanism, but are to be considered as part ofenvironmental qualification (EQ) with respect to a driving force for humidity and moistureduring the event.

b. Explain how the margins identified in the Institute of Electrical and ElectronicsEngineers Standard 323-1974 (i.e., Temperature, Pressure, etc.) are being maintainedunder EPU conditions.

PTN EQ program licensing basis was approved based on IEEE 323-1971 which does notrequire margins above the design basis accident profiles. FPL committed to meetNUREG-0588, "Interim Staff Position on Equipment Qualification of Safety-RelatedElectrical Equipment" [Reference 4], and the later version of IEEE 323-1974 for any EQequipment installed after February 22, 1983 as part of the original NRC program approval.As identified in item 1.4 of NUREG - 0588, additional margin need not be added to theradiation parameter if the methods identified in Appendix D of NUREG-0588 are utilized.The methods used to determine the PTN radiation parameters are consistent with theAppendix D methodology for current and EPU conditions. As documented in the currentPTN EQ Program Manual, the radiation margins required by section 6.3.1.5 ofIEEE 323-1974 are not necessary.

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 L-2011-081Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Attachment I

Page 3 of 22

Typically only the peak accident temperature and pressure are compared against the EQqualification temperature to demonstrate qualification per IEEE 323-1974 as can be seen inexample Figure 1 on page 16 of IEEE 323. Peak temperature and pressure present the mostdemanding environment and cause the greatest challenge to equipment. PTN EQ profileswere developed to show the limiting profile that would support equipment qualification forall EQ equipment.

The difference between the EQ Qualification (Qual) Envelope and the EPU LOCAtemperature curves is that the EPU LOCA temperature curve does not drop below a 150Fmargin until after at least 2.7 hours when the temperature is declining and any potentialdamage would have already occurred. In addition, the EQ Qual Envelope temperature stepsshow a higher temperature is maintained for significantly longer than the EPU LOCAtempature curve. This adds margin since electrical equipment aging is a function oftemperature and duration. Therefore, the margin added due to maintaining a longer durationat higher temperatures is considered adequate for qualification.

The difference between the EQ and the EPU pressure design curve is that the EPU pressuredesign curve does not drop below 10% margin until after at least 50 minutes at which timeboth the design and EQ curves decrease by at least 20 psi. Since the first time step, which isat the highest pressure, provides greater than 10% margin for the entire time step, additionalmargin over the 10% IEEE 323 guideline is provided. The remaining time steps maintain theEQ profile at constant pressure above the design profile for the majority of the time step andbuild margin greater than 10% that compensates for the subsequent time steps where the 10%margin is not achieved. As stated above, the damage mechanism associated with pressure isnot age-related, but a function of the pressure magnitude which causes greater moistureintrusion. Since the EQ profile maintains the pressure above the design profile for a greaterduration and the maximum pressure is above 10% of design, the developed margin isconsidered adequate for qualification.

c. Figure 2.3.1-1 appears to show that the required temperature margin (15 degreesFahrenheit) is not being maintained. Clarify the apparent deviation.

See response EEEB-1. Lb above

d. The licensee stated that while some EPU pressure points well after the peak EPUpressure slightly exceed EPU pressure envelope, the integrated EPU pressure curveremains below the current environmental qualification (EQ) envelope during PostAccident Operability Time (PAOT) period of 31 days. Provide the 'integrated EPUpressure curve'.

The statement referencing the integrated EPU pressure curve is based on a qualitativeassessment of the difference between the area under the EPU LOCA Profile and the areaunder the EQ Qualification Envelop. As can be seen from inspecting the pressure curve, thearea under the EQ Pressure Profile exceeds the area under the EPU LOCA curve, eventhough there are a few points where the actual EPU LOCA curve does exceed the EPUQualification curve.

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 L-2011-081Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Attachment 1

Page 4 of 22

8 0 .0 0 . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

EQ Press Profile7 O 0 -!................. ..................................................... ... ...... ............ .................................... .....................3 D a , P O ............70.00 ..............31 D ay-R A O T ............. . ........

- EPUMSLB

"6 0 .... . .. . ..... ......0 /"...... .... ........... .. ........... ...................................... .............. ...... .. .. . .. .... .. ..... .... ... -- 3 D a___EO PressProfile

50.00.......EPU LOCA -31 Day

PAOT

EPULOCA

3o0m i................. ............................... ................ ............................................................... ........... ............................................

iOE-01 l.OE+00 L.OE+01 LOE+02 1.OE+03 1.OE+04 l.OE+05 l.OE+06 1.OE+07Time (sec)

................ .. ..................................... - 1 1............................................................................ . .. . . . ................................ . . . .. .. . .... . . . . . . .. .. .. . . ............ ... .... ........................................ . .. . .. .. . . ... ..................................... .. .. . . ............. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . ............................... . . . . . .. . .. ....

e. The licensee stated that following EPU, the containment submergence level orcontainment flood elevation has changed. The EPU maximum containment sumptemperature is 4 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the current maximum due to thermalpower increase. The licensee concluded that there is no impact on the EQ population orqualification of existing EQ equipment based on its review. Provide a summary of theevaluation used to determine that there would be no impact on the EQ population orqualification of existing EQ equipment.

All Class IE electrical equipment locations inside containment were reviewed and comparedagainst the postulated new flood levels. As stated in LR Section 2.3.1.2.3. 1, the EPUmaximum containment flood level is 2.2 inches higher than the pre-EPU flood level. FPLdetermined from the review of EQ documentation packages (Doc Pacs) for equipment insidecontainment and other configuration control documents that no EQ equipment is locatedbelow the flood level.

EEEB-1.2In Section 2.3.1.2.3.2 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, the licensee stated that any ContainmentEQ equipment that could not meet new EPU bounding radiation dose level was assessed fordose reduction. Factors included consideration if a component was sealed, equipmentshielding, and the actual distance from the radiation source.Provide a list of equipment Which could not meet the new EPU bounding radiation doselevel and a brief summary of dose reduction factor(s) considered for each componentincluding any planned modifications that shows that the resulting radiation dose willremain below the existing EQ level.


Page 5 of 22

The initial screen of the below listed 18 Rosemount transmitters (nine in Unit 3 and nine inUnit 4) resulted in the determination that the bounding EPU in-containment gamma radiationenvironments exceeded the qualification levels for these transmitters.

PTN Doc Pac 1001-24.1, Rosemount Transmitters (18)

* LT-3-459, LT-3-460, and LT-3-461

* PT-3-403, PT-3-404, PT-3-405, and PT-3-406

* FT-3-932 and FT-3-933

" LT-4-459, LT-4-460, and LT-4-461

" PT-4-403, PT-4-404, PT-4-405, and PT-4-406

* FT-4-932 and FT-4-933

Thus, location-specific integrated gamma dose estimates were developed for these transmitters.Note that since these transmitters are sealed, exposure to in-containment beta radiation was not aconcern.

The bounding EPU in-containment radiation environment is conservatively based on a sphericalcloud model with no credit for shielding. The location-specific gamma dose to each of the18 transmitters was developed taking into consideration the shielding provided by major wallsand floors within the containment. Since the transmitters are mounted on the outside surface ofthe missile barrier wall, the dose model changes from an essentially finite spherical cloud to afinite hemispherical cloud, which reduces the source term and thus dose. The accidentcomponent-specific dose estimate included the contribution from the post-LOCA radioactivityairborne in the containment, as well as that mixed in the sump fluid. The EPU assessmentdemonstrated that the estimated location-specific 31-day integrated post-LOCA plus 60-yearnormal operation dose to the 18 Rosemount transmitters will remain below the qualificationlevel.

In accordance with current licensing basis methodology, the EPU evaluation continued to takecredit for shielding from beta radiation as described below. If deemed necessary, and inaccordance with the guidance provided in NRC IE Bulletin (IEB) 79-01 B, "EnvironmentalQualification of Class lE Equipment," [Reference 5], the qualification assessment for cablestook credit for the shielding provided by cable jacketing material, by other cables in the tray andby the tray itself. In addition, the contribution of beta radiation was ignored if the radiationsensitive portion of the component was sealed in an enclosure. The number of components thatcredited shielding to attenuate for beta was not impacted as a result of the higher radiationenvironments due to the EPU.

EEEB-1.3Regarding Section 2.3.1.2.3.3 of Attachment 4 of the LAR:

a. The licensee stated the normal operating gamma radiation dose in the Aux Building hasincreased in some EQ Zones due to the EPU. However, the EPU dose estimates in theworst case EQ zone has not changed and remains at 5.26E+04 Rads. Provide asummary of the evaluation of equipment that shows how the EQ of all equipmentremains bounding for normal operating EPU conditions.


Page 6 of 22

As a screening tool, FPL used the radiation environment in the worst case zone for outsidecontainment (Auxiliary Building) locations, recognizing that even as the integrated dose insome radiation zones changed, as long as the worst case zone was used for screening, and theequipment met the environmental qualification requirements for that zone, then theequipment in the lower dose zones would remain acceptable. The radiation zones used thenormal 60-year dose plus the 31-day accident dose to get a total integrated dose (TID) for thepurpose of qualification. This TID was compared against the qualification dose presented inthe EQ Doc Pacs and, as long as the EQ Doc Pac qualification dose exceeded the worst caseTID the equipment was considered qualified with no further review required.

b. The licensee stated that EPU gamma radiation dose in the Auxiliary Building hasincreased in the worse [worst] case EQ Zone from 7.50E+06 to 1.1E+07 Rads. Somemild areas have become harsh due to dose increases from EPU.i. Provide a summary of the evaluation of equipment that shows how the EQ of all

equipment remains bounding for accident EPU conditions.

The initial screening performed to evaluate the radiation qualification of EQ equipmentused the accident radiation level for the worst case radiation zone outside containmentfor evaluation. The use of the worst case radiation zone recognizes that even as theradiation levels in other radiation zones may have changed, as long as the radiationlevel for the worst case zone was used and the equipment met the EQ radiationrequirements for that zone, the lower zones were inconsequential. As described abovein the response to EEEB-1.3.a, the 60-year normal dose was added to the worst case31-day accident dose to get the total integrated dose (TID). For the initial screening theworst case TID was compared to the radiation level in the individual EQ Doc Pacs. Aslong as the EQ Doc Pac qualification dose was greater than the worst case TID, theequipment was considered qualified, with no further review required. This initialscreening review identified five components outside containment that required furtherevaluation. These components included 1. cables manufactured by Okonite, 2. cablesmanufactured by General Cable, 3. cables manufactured by Kerite, 4. Masoneilan I/PTransducers, and 5. Valcor Solenoid Valves.

Okonite Cable

A new bounding integrated dose calculation was done for each of the areas outsidecontainment containing EQ cables manufactured by Okonte by considering actual EPUradiation sources in the room and shine from adjacent rooms rather than using the mostlimiting dose for areas outside containment. A conservative bounding dose for anentire room was determined by calculating the dose 1 foot from a pipe that representedthe entire volume of piping carrying post accident sump fluid in the room. Theintegrated dose from adjacent room shine and the normal 60-year dose was alsocalculated and added to the pipe dose in the room. This more detailed dose calculationshowed all areas outside containment with EQ cables manufactured by Okonite werebelow the qualification levels for the ten cable codes involved.

General Cable

Areas containing EQ cables manufactured by General Cable had a detailed locationspecific dose calculation performed. The actual distance from each pipe containingpost-LOCA fluid to the cable was measured and the dose contribution from each pipe


Page 7 of 22

was calculated and summed to provide a pipe dose in the room. The pipe dosecontribution from adjacent rooms was also added to the pipe dose within the room toproduce a pipe dose. The normal 60-year dose was also calculated and added to thepipe dose. This detailed location specific dose calculation showed that the dose for allareas outside containment with EQ cables manufactured by General Cable were belowthe qualification levels.

Kerite Cables

Qualification of EQ cables manufactured by Kerite to the higher radiation levelrequirements following EPU was demonstrated by a new EQ test report that envelopesthe EPU higher dose.

Masoneilan I/P Transducers, and Valcor Solenoid Valves

The subject EQ devices are part of the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS). AllPASS equipment has been removed from the PTN Technical Specifications and hasbeen determined as not required to mitigate an accident or provide operator assessmentcapability. The devices in question were conservatively left on the EQ master list sincethey could still be operated. However, as part of the EPU implementation they will beremoved from the master EQ list since they no longer provide a required post-accidentfunction.

ii. Provide a list of equipment that is being added to the master EQ list as a result ofthe new areas being designated as Harsh.

The majority of the PTN EQ cables are identified on the EQ list by cable type andmanufacturer. However, several cables are listed by manufacturer only. All cables inthe new harsh radiation areas were reviewed and their specific cable type was checkedagainst the EQ list. Seven cable types were found that did not exist on the EQ list andconsequently were identified as new EQ cables. However, upon review of the EQ DocPacs for cables identified on the EQ list by manufacturer only, it was discovered thatthe 7 new cable types are included in the Doc Pacs for Rockbestos and Teledyne cables.

No new equipment was required to be added to the PTN EQ List as a result of thereviews performed for EPU since Rockbestos and Teledyne cables are on the existingEQ list.

iii. Show how the newly added equipment meets EQ requirements under EPU

conditions, and has been maintained as EQ for its installed life.

No new equipment is being added to the PTN EQ List as a result of the reviewsperformed for EPU.

EEEB-1.4

In Section 2.3.1.2.3.4 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, the licensee stated that any AuxiliaryBuilding EQ equipment that could not meet new EPU bounding radiation dose level wasassessed for dose reduction. Factors included consideration for equipment shielding, andthe actual distance from the radiation source.


Page 8 of 22

Provide a list of equipment which could not meet the new EPU bounding radiation doselevel and a brief summary of dose reduction factor(s) considered for each componentincluding any planned modifications that shows that the resulting radiation dose willremain below the existing EQ level.

As described in EEEB-1.3.b above, Auxiliary Building equipment that could not meet the initialscreening requirements for the increased radiation levels following EPU was identified. Thesecomponents included EQ cables manufactured by Okonite, General Cable, and Kerite, andMasoneilan I/P transducers and Valcor solenoid valves. The Kerite cables were qualified byusing an existing qualification report in EQ Doc Pac 34.2 that previously was not needed sincehigher radiation qualification was previously not required to qualify the cables at current licensedpower level. As described in the response to EEEB-1.3.b above, the other Okonite and Genralcables had location-specific doses evaluated. As part of this evaluation, the distance ofequipment from recirculation piping sources and shielding afforded by plant components wasused to lower the effective radiation dose at the EQ devices. The Masoneilan I/P transducers andValcor solenoid valves were removed from the EQ list since they are only required to support thePASS system which is no longer required to respond to a design basis LOCA.

No equipment modifications were determined to be necessary as a result of this review.

EEEB-1.5

In Section 2.3.1.2.4 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, the licensee stated that with respect to thelicense renewal described in NUREG-1779 [NUREG-17591, EPU activities do not add anynew components, any new or previously unevaluated materials, nor introduce any newfunctions for existing components that would change the license renewal system evaluationboundaries.

Provide a summary of the evaluation that provides verification of above statement.

FPL evaluated impact of the EPU against the following License Renewal Program documents:

1. NUREG- 1759, "Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the TurkeyPoint, Units 3 and 4" [Reference 6]

2. "Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4, Application for Renewed Operating Licenses"[Reference 7]

3. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 16 "Aging Management Programs and TimeLimited Aging Analysis" [Reference 8]

4. NUREG-1801, "Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report," US Nuclear RegulatoryCommission [Reference 9]

The FPL evaluation focuses on identifying the potential impacts on the License RenewalProgram elements due to the implementation of the FPL EPU Program.

No new aging effects have been identified for equipment in the EQ Program as a result of EPU.The evaluation for EPU conditions demonstrated the continued qualification of the existingequipment. The EQ program as described in FSAR Chapter 16.2.6 will continue to cover itsscope of aging management through the license renewal period considering the EPU condition.


Page 9 of 22

Some environmental parameters have changed due to EPU. Therefore, changes to some of theEQ Doc Pacs are required to incorporate the changes for LOCA, main steam line break (MSLB),high energy line break (HELB), and/or radiation dose changes. Therefore, the EPU will have animpact on the EQ of electrical equipment within the scope of the program.

FPL has assessed the effects of the proposed EPU on EQ of electrical equipment. FPL concludesthat it has adequately addressed the effects of the proposed EPU on the environmental conditionsand the qualification of electrical equipment. FPL further concludes that the electrical equipmentwill continue to meet the requirements of its current licensing basis with regard to 10 CFR 50.49following implementation of the proposed EPU. Therefore, FPL finds the proposed EPUacceptable with respect to the EQ of electrical equipment.

EEEB-1.6

Explain why a maximum of 889 Megawatts Electric (MWe) generation of each unit wasconsidered in the System Impact Study while the maximum main generator output ismentioned to be 899.8 MWe in Section 2.3.3.2.3 of Attachment 4 of the LAR.

The Generation Interconnection Service System Impact Study, submitted to the NRC by FPLletter L-2010-160 [Reference 10], was originally performed with heat balance data thatrepresented the best information available at that time. That heat balance specified an EPU peakwinter power level of 889 MWe under lowest cooling water temperature conditions. Asubsequent heat balance performed after the original System Impact Study specified an EPUpeak winter power level of 898.9 MWe under more stringent winter cooling water temperatureassumptions. Addendum #2 to the System Impact Study (Attachment 2) addresses the impactsof using a revised more conservative power level of 899.8 MWe. No additional transmissionreinforcements are required as a result of the higher generator output.

EEEB-1.7

Regarding Section 2.3.3.2.3 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, provide the existing and revisedcurrent transformer ratings of main generator.

The existing main generator current transformers (CTs) are rated 30000/5A with temperaturerating of 130'C. The replacement CTs are rated 35000/5 A with ANSI accuracy classificationsof C800 and temperature rating of 130'C (Class B insulation).

EEEB-1.8

Regarding Section 2.3.3.2.3 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, provide a summary of any majorchanges required to the main generator and main transformer protection, such asreplacement of relays, as a result of the proposed EPU.

Since the generator and transformer nameplate rating increased in support of EPU, new CTs arerequired at the generator terminal. Therefore, 35000/5A CTs will replace the existing 30000/5Aunits. In addition, to accommodate the change in the generator capacitance, the generator neutralgrounding transformer and resistor will be replaced. No major changes, such as protective relayreplacements, are required.


Page 10 of 22

EEEB-1.9

On page 2.3.3-7 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, the licensee stated that loads that will increaseas a result of the proposed EPU include the heater drain pump, the intake cooling waterpump, and the circulating water pump motors. However, no specific increase in loads forthese pump motors is indicated in Table 2.3.3-15. Explain the apparent discrepancy.

The mechanical EPU evaluations determined the existing and EPU brake horsepower (BHP)loads of the heater drain pump, the intake cooling water pump, and the circulating water pumpmotors for comparison. The mechanical EPU evaluations determined that the BHP loads onthese motors have increased under post-EPU conditions.

The information in Table 2.3.3-15 reflects the motor BHP loads used in the pre-EPU (existing)and post-EPU AC electrical distribution analyses. The motor loads used in the pre-EPU(existing) electrical analysis were modeled conservatively higher than the post-EPU loadsdetermined in the mechanical EPU evaluations. The same conservative motor loads used in thepre-EPU (existing) electrical analysis were also used in the post-EPU electrical analysis.Therefore, the loads for these motors are viewed as unchanged values in the table. The increasein BHP load for these motors under post-EPU conditions remains bounded by the values creditedin the pre-EPU electrical analysis.

EEEB-1.10Regarding Page 2.3.3-7 and 2.3.3-8 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, provide the technicalrationale for determining that it is acceptable for the maximum momentary short circuitcurrents exceeding the switchgear bus rating at 4.16 kV Buses 3AA1 and 3AB1 for existingconditions and at Buses 4AA1 and 4AB1 (Table 2.3.3-10) for both existing and EPUconditions.As indicated in Table 2.3.3-10 below, in the pre-EPU configuration for PTN Units 3 and 4, themaximum momentary short circuit current exceeds the switchgear bus rating at 4.16 kV buses3AA1, 3AB1, 4AA1 and 4AB1.

In addition, the electrical analysis which was originally presented in the EPU LicenseAmendment Request (LAR) has been updated to reflect actual Unit Auxiliary Transformer(UAT) vendor test data. The new test data is the result of the plan to replace the UATs fornon-EPU obsolescence reasons. As indicated in Table 2.3.3-10 below, the new UAT test dataresults in the buses 4AA1 and 4AB1 having a momentary overduty in the post-EPUconfiguration. This condition is eliminated for buses 3AA1 and 3AB1 in the post-EPU conditionand, while still exceeding the buses' momentary rating. The severity is decreased for buses4AA1 and 4AB I in the post-EPU condition. Also, as shown in Table 2.3.3-12 below, the reactorcoolant pump (RCP) and steam generator feed pump circuit breakers on bus 4AA 1 have aninterrupting short circuit current overduty in the pre-EPU and post-EPU configuration and theRCP circuit breakers on bus 4AB 1 has an interrupting short circuit current overduty in thepre-EPU configuration.

These overduty conditions are still determined to be acceptable based on a very low likelihood ofoccurrence and low level of risk rationales as follows:

- The bus overload condition only exists when the associated Emergency Diesel Generator(EDG) is paralleled to the grid through the Unit Auxiliary Transformer (UAT). This


Page I I of 22

condition occurs only during EDG testing which is one hour per month and 24 hours every18 months. Sufficient margin on interrupting ratings exist when the EDG is not paralleled tothe grid.

- When the EDG is paralleled to the grid it is considered inoperable since the EDG protectiverelaying response to an external system disturbance is not quick enough to trip the EDGcircuit breaker.

- Paralleling an EDG to the grid does not overload the 4160 V buses or breakers.

- The 4160 V buses are connected in a delta phase configuration. This configuration willaccommodate a grounded phase without creating a fault condition.

- There is a high resistance ground system that will provide indication of a ground event onany phase of the 4160 V buses with high sensitivity.

- Degradation of the insulation on the 4160 V buses will not be an acute event.

- The buses are enclosed in a ventilated compartment on top of the switchgear.

- The phase bus bars are sleeved with an insulated jacket and configured in a honeycombinsulating bus support arrangement. In this condition, a ground fault due to insulation boardtracking would occur prior to a 3 phase fault.

- The 4160 V switchgear rooms have a closed ventilation system. Outside air is not forcedthrough the room reducing potential contaminates or corrosion effects.

- The 4160V buses are thoroughly inspected on a 36 month interval.

- The 4160V breakers are thoroughly inspected on a 36 month interval.

- The Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) model has a Core Damage Frequency (CDF) modelthat determined a probability of 4.5 E -07 per year for a fault occurring on a 4160 V buswhen the EDG is loaded and paralleled with the grid. Even with this conservativeassumption that the three-phase bolted fault occurs on a once per year interval, the change inthe CDF is nearly three orders of magnitude less than what would be considered significantby the NRC.

- The EPU project and associated configuration changes are reducing the momentary shortcircuit loading on the 4160 V buses on both PTN units.

Based on the above, nuclear safety is not compromised for this condition. From the standpointof personnel safety, there are many conservative factors used in the fault studies which, whencombined and credited, lead FPL to conclude that exposure of the 3AA1, 3AB1, 4AA1 and4AB 1 buses to fault current levels exceeding their manufacturer's ratings is an event that can bedeemed to be incredible.

Therefore, FPL concludes that no modification is needed to the bus and breaker capability towithstand the hypothetical fault levels that slightly exceed the manufacturers' ratings forinfrequent EDG surveillance activities.


L-2011-081Attachment IPage 12 of 22

Table 2.3.3-104.16 kV Switchgear Bus Momentary Short Circuit Current

Bus Maximum pre-EPU Maximum EPU Momentary DesignMomentary Duty, Momentary Duty, Rating,rms Asymmetrical rms Asymmetrical rms Asymmetrical

(kA) (kA) (kA)

Unit 3

3AA1 79.799 77.632 78

3AA2 53.841 53.101 783AB1 79.014 76.169 78

3AB2 53.382 52.432 78

3AD 41.171 40.704 80

3C 68.448 68.291 78

Unit 4

4AA1 84.252 82.503 78

4AA2 60.653 60.381 78

4AB1 83.398 80.041 78

4AB2 59.882 59.018 78

4AD 40.798 40.626 80

4C 66.364 66.212 78



Table 2.3.3-114.16 kV Switchgear Circuit Breaker Momentary Short Circuit Current

Maximum Pre-EPU Maximum EPU Momentary Design

Bus Momentary Duty, Momentary Duty, Rating,rms Asymmetrical rms Asymmetrical rms Asymmetrical

(kA) (kA) (kA)

Unit 3

3AA1 71.478 69.169 80

3AA2 53.527 52.785 80

3AB1 70.205 67.210 80

3AB2 53.075 52.123 80

3AD 40.885 40.416 60

3C 68.234 68.077 78

Unit 4

4AA1 76.104 74.219 80

4AA2 60.343 60.069 80

4AB1 75.290 71.805 80

4AB2 59.571 58.706 80

4AD 40.545 40.370 60

4C 66.148 65.997 78


L-2011-081Attachment 1Page 14 of 22

Table 2.3.3-124.16 kV Switchgear Circuit Breaker Interrupting Short Circuit Current

Interrupting, Symmetrical (kA)

Unit 3

3AA1 44.165 46.119 44.702 46.215

3AA2 33.303 46.532 33.907 46.633

3AB1 43.304 46.136 43.183 46.248

3AB2 33.102 46.530 33.452 46.647

3AD 24.790 33.269 24.123 33.341

3C 42.318 45.135 42.261 45.172

Unit 4

4AA1 47.169 46.429 47.825 46.505

4AA2 37.227 46.855 38.031 46.954

4AB1 46.691 46.325 46.057 46.446

4AB2 36.892 46.714 37.144 46.860

4AD 26.187 33.507 25.694 33.578

4C 41.276 44.966 41.224 44.991

EEEB-1.11

Regarding Page 2.3.3-10 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, provide a summary of calculationsthat shows that the degraded voltage relay and undervoltage relay settings at the 480 Voltload center buses are not adversely affected by operation under EPU conditions.

Motor starting analyses were performed to ensure sufficient bus voltages exist for properfunctioning of the safety-related equipment.

If safety-related bus voltages drop to or below the maximum dropout setpoint limits of thedegraded voltage (DGV) relays and of the under voltage (UV) relays - 3271, 327H, and 327T,then voltages at the safety-related buses must recover to or above the maximum pickup setpointlimits of the relays before the relaying time delay (timers or characteristic curves) expires.

Tables 1.11-1 and 1. 11-2 show the existing relay setpoints for Relays 3271 and 327H.Tables 1. 11-3 and 1. 11-4 show the resultant bus voltages for operation of Relays 3271 and 327Hunder EPU motor starting conditions.

The relay settings in Tables 1.11-1 and 1.11-2 are compared against the EPU analysis resultantbus voltages in Tables 1.11-3 and 1.11-4 to ensure that the relays are able to pick-up, following adrop-out, within the minimum relay time setting.



The results in Tables 1.11-3 and 1.11-4 indicate that the DGV and UV relays are able to achievepick-up, within the relay minimum time settings specified in Tables 1.11-1 and 1.11-2, followinga drop-out. Therefore, the existing DGV and UV relay setpoints are demonstrated to be adequateunder EPU.

Table 1.11-1Degraded Voltage Relay (3271) Settings

Location - Max Relay Max Relay Min Time480 V Load Dropout Pickup Setting

Center Setting Setting (Sec)

3A (3B01) 429 V 440.696 V 59.53B (3B02) 432 V 446.204 V 59.53C (3B03) 442 V 446.426 V 59.53D (3B04) 440 V 444.612 V 59.54A (4B01) 435 V 441.677 V 59.54B (4B02) 441 V 450.225 V 59.54C (4B03) 439 V 444.665 V 59.54D (4B04) 439 V 444.179 V 59.5

Table 1.11-2Under Voltage Relay (327H) Settings

Location - Max Relay Max Relay Min Time480 V Load Dropout Pickup Setting

Center Settin Setting (Sec)3A (3B01) 435 V 439.047 V 93B (3B02) 443 V 447.046 V 93C (3B03) 439 V 443.046 V 93D (3B04) 439 V 443.046 V 94A (4B01) 440 V 444.046 V 94B (4B02) 439 V 443.046 V 94C (4B03) 439 V 443.046 V 94D (4B04) 435 V 439.047 V) 9



Table 1.11-3Bus Voltages for PSB-1/LOCA Motor Starts,

('/)Loading Sequence Train A Train B

Time (s) LC 3A LC 3C LC 3B LC 3D

(3B01) (3B03) (3B02) (3B04)

t = 0.0+ 424 426 421 417

LBI: t = 0.11+ 463 465 459 456

LB2: t = 3+ 454 456 450 447

LB3: t = 11+ 428 459 454 422

LB4: t = 18+ 459 461 456 453

LB5: t = 25+ 458 461 455 452

LB6: t = 32+ 465 467 462 458

LB7: t = 39+ 465 467 462 458

LB8: t = 44+ 427 463 457 421

RCP: t = 48.1+ 402 404 398 395

Steady State: t = 50+ 466 468 463 459

Table 1.11-4Bus Voltages for PSB-1/LOCA Motor Starts,

Loading Sequence Train A Train B

Time (s) LC 4A LC 4C LC 4B LC 4D

(4B01) (4B03) (4B02) (4B04)

t = 0.0+ 424 427 423 422

LBI: t = 0.11+ 463 466 460 461

LB2: t = 3+ 434 454 448 432

Run: t = 4.1+ 463 468 463 461

LB3: t = 11+ 422 464 455 423

LB4: t = 18+ 452 462 456 451

LB5: t = 25+ 451 462 456 450

LB6: t = 32+ 457 468 462 456

LB7: t = 39+ 457 468 462 456

LB8: t = 44+ 423 464 458 422

RCP: t = 48.1+ 397 409 403 396

Steady State: t = 50+ 458 469 463 457

Table 1.11-5 shows the existing relay setpoints and EPU analysis resultant bus voltages foroperation of Relay 327T under EPU motor starting conditions. The time required for the busvoltage to increase from drop-out (D.O.), and exceed the maximum relay voltage setting, isdetermined from the relay characteristic curves. The relay settings are compared against the

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 L-2011-081Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-25 1 Attachment 1

Page 17 of 22

tabulated resultant bus voltages to ensure that the relays are able to pick-up, following adrop-out, within the relay calculated pickup time.

The results in Table 1.11-5 indicate that the DGV 327T relays are able to achieve pick-up, withinthe relay calculated pickup time, following a drop-out. Note that the 327T relay on 480 V loadcenter Bus 4D does not drop out under motor starting conditions. Therefore, the existing DGV327T relay setpoints are demonstrated to be adequate under EPU.

Table 1.11-5

Load Max Calc Required Calc Calc P.U.Center Relay D.O. Relay P.U. Voltage

Bus Setting Voltage P.U. Time Time (V)us (V) (V) (Sec) (Sec) (V

3A (3B01) 404 402 13 1.9 4663B (3B02) 411.14 398 13 1.9 4633C (3B03) 400.936 383 13 1.3 4573D (3B04) 400.936 395 13 1.9 4594A (4B01) 391 384 50 1.3 4574B (4B02) 401 394 12 1.3 4684C (4B03) 393 385 40 1.3 458

EEEB-1-12

Regarding Page 2.3.3-11 and 2.3.3-12 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, provide a summary ofcalculations that shows that emergency diesel generator (EDG) loading in the post-EPUstate, after taking into account new loads and the loading on the 120 V alternating currentvital (safety-related) instrument power systems, will remain within each EDG's capacity,even after taking into account EDG operation at extreme limits of revised frequency andvoltage.

EDG LoadingEDG 3A, with the following ratings and the least margin among the EDGs at PTN is used asa bounding case.

Base Continuous Rating 2500 kWBasic Overload Rating 2750 kW2000 Hour Peaking Rating 2850 kW168 Hour Emergency Rating 2950 kW1/2 Hour Exceptional Rating 3050 kW


Page 18 of 22

The EDG loadings for EDG 3A have been analyzed for changes under EPU conditions as shownbelow:

UNIT 3 MAXIMUM LOAD AT EPUEDG 3A

Load @ 60 Hz Load @ 60.6 Hz(kW) (kW)

Description Unit 3 LOOP with Unit 3 LOOP withUnit 3 LOCA, Unit 3 LOCA,

0-85.5 sec 0-85.5 secAutomatic Loads 1694.95 1741.08Manual Loads 258.82 266.63Automatic and Manual Loads 1953.77 2007.71

Notes:

1) The EDG load changes credit emergency containment filter fans 3V3A, B, C placed out ofservice under EPU and the intake cooling water pumps 3P9A, B, C load is increased to271 kW under EPU

2) The EDG 3A SBO Pre-EPU and EPU Loading comparison is provided in the response toEEEB- 1. 14.

120 VAC Loading

For vital 120 VAC loadings for EPU, the changes are identified in EEEB- 1.13 (EPUmodifications, items 8 and 9). The new vital 120 VAC loads are powered through invertersand in the battery sizing calculation are configured for maximum loading. The highestcalculated loading of any inverter pre-EPU is 93.74% loaded on a full load of 58.59A. Thelargest estimated load for any inverter from items 8 and 9 is 0.63A.

EEEB-1.13Regarding Page 2.3.4-3 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, the licensee stated that both the safetyrelated and non-safety related portions of the 125 V DC systems were evaluated todetermine potential impacts due to EPU. The five non safety-related modificationsdiscussed on Page 2.3.4-2 will have a small impact on the DC Power System. The currentunused system capacity associated with the batteries and chargers is sufficient toaccommodate the impact of these additional EPU loads on the DC Power System.Provide a comparison of the existing loads to the EPU loads and the design rating for eachsafety related and non-safety related battery at Turkey Point Units 3 and 4.There are no EPU plant modifications, or changes that adversely affect the DC Power systempost EPU.



The batteries were calculated to have the following margins:

Safety Related Batteries

Pre-EPU Post-EPUBattery Actual Required Margin Required Margin

Positive Plate Positive Plate Positive Plate

3D03 12 10.72 10.6% 10.72 10.6%

3D24 8 6.378 20.3% 6.421 19.7%

4D24 8 7.005 12.4% 7.04 12.0%

4D03 12 11.91 0.8% 11.91 0.8%

Non-Safety Related Batteries

Actual Pre-EPU Post-EPUBattery positive Plate Required Margin Required Margin

Positive Plate Positive Plate

3D34 16 12.291 23.2% 12.333 22.9%

4D34 16 12.214 23.7% 12.25 23.4%

The maximum load (worst period) on the batteries are as follows:

Safety Related BatteriesPre-EPU Post-EPU

Battery Highest HighestLoad (A) Load (A)

3D03 839 839

3D24 523 525.9

4D24 663 664.5

4D03 902 903.4

Non-Safety Related BatteriesPre-EPU Post-EPU

Battery Highest Highest

Load (A) Load (A)

3D34 842 844.08

4D34 841 843.08


Page 20 of 22

There are nine (9) modifications being implemented for EPU that will result in minorchanges to the safety related and non-safety related batteries as follows:

1. Replacement of the feedwater isolation valves will add DC solenoids to the safetyrelated portion of the DC system. This modification is anticipated to have a smallimpact on the safety related portion of the DC power system.

2. Electro-hydraulic controls (EHC) upgrade will add DC solenoids, which have very lowpower requirements, to the non-safety related DC power system.

3. Leading edge flow meter (LEFM) feedwater flow metering will add AC loads to thenon-safety related inverters.

4. Turbine digital controls upgrade will add AC loads to the non-safety related inverters.

5. Feedwater heater drains digital controls upgrade will add AC loads to the non-safetyrelated inverters.

6. Re-powering of the alternate Spent Fuel Pool pump will add control circuit load to thesafety related batteries.

7. Replacement of the Power System Stabilizer (PSS) will add load to the non-safetyrelated batteries.

8. Replacement of the motor operated damper for the Normal Containment Coolers willadd a momentary load to the vital inverters.

9. The pressurizer setpoint and control modification will replace 3 existing indicators oneach unit, adding load to the vital inverters.

EEEB-1.14

Regarding Page 2.3.5-4 of Attachment 4 of the LAR, provide a summary of EDG stationblackout (SBO) loads, with one unit in SBO and the other unit experiencing loss of offsitepower event, for both existing and under EPU conditions.

The most limiting of the four Emergency Diesel Generators (EDGs) is EDG 3A. Therefore EDG3A, with the least margin of the EDGs, is used for comparison:



Table 1.14-1

EDG SBO Loading Evaluation

Unit 3 Non Blackout (LOOP), Station Blackout 90 Sec - 8 Hrson Unit 4 and only EDG 3A Available (kW)

Total - Unit 3 Automatic Loads 1035

Total - Unit 3 Manual Loads 510Total - Unit 3 Auto and Manual Loads 1545Total - Unit 4 Station Blackout Loads 1250

Total - Unit 3 Auto and Manual Loads and 2795Unit 4 Station Blackout Loads

EDG 3A 2000 Hour Rating 2850EDG 3A 168 Hour Emergency Rating 2950Design Margin for 2000 Hour Rating 55Design Margin for 168 Hour Emergency Rating 155

Table 1.14-2EDG SBO Loading Evaluation - Post-EPU with Overfrequency Operation

Unit 3 Non Blackout (LOOP), Station Blackout 0.67% OF

on Unit 4 and only EDG 3A Available 90 Sec - 8 Hrs(kW)

Total - Unit 3 Automatic Loads 1040Total - Unit 3 Manual Loads 517Total - Unit 3 Auto and Manual Loads 1557Total - Unit 4 Station Blackout Loads 1264

Total - Unit 3 Auto and Manual Loads and 2821Unit 4 Station Blackout Loads

EDG 3A 2000 Hour Rating 2850EDG 3A 168 Hour Emergency Rating 2950Design Margin for 2000 Hour Rating 29Design Margin for 168 Hour Emergency Rating 129

Note: Load center (LC) transformer losses were adjusted base on transformer actualloadings.

During an SBO event, after the automatic loads have been activated, manual loads areoperator activated. The operator is required to verify that adequate kW margin is availableprior to adding load to the EDG and adjust the frequency to be within the "Green Band" onthe indicator as required. The "Green Band" provides a span of ±0.2 Hz, and whencombined with a reading accuracy of ±0.2 Hz would maintain the frequency within ±0.4 Hz.The table above indicates that maintaining the frequency within 0.4 Hz (0.67 %over-frequency) the EDG load is under the 2000 hour rating by 29 kW.-


Page 22 of 22

References

1. M. Kiley (FPL) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (L-2010-113), "LicenseAmendment Request No. 205: Extended Power Uprate (EPU)," (TAC Nos. ME4907 andME4908), Accession No. ML103560169, October 21, 2010

2, Email from J. Paige (NRC) to T. Abbatiello (FPL), "Turkey Point EPU - ElectricalEngineering (EEEB) Request for Additional Information - Round 1," AccessionNo. ML 110610719, March 2, 2011

3. IEEE 323 - 1974, "Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for Nuclear PowerGenerating Stations"

4. NUREG-0588, "Interim Staff Position on Equipment Qualification of Safety-RelatedElectrical Equipment," February 5, 1980

5. NRC IE Bulleting 79-011B, "Environmental Qualification of Class 1E Equipment,"January 14, 1980

6. NUREG7 1759, "Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the TurkeyPoint, Units 3 and 4," Accession No. ML021260004, April 2002

7. "Application for Renewed Operating Licenses", Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 4,Accession No. ML003749538, September 8, 2000

8. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 16 "Aging Management Programs and TimeLimited Aging Analysis"

9. NUREG-1801, "Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report", US Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, July 2001

10. M. Kiley (FPL) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (L-2010-160), "Supplement to theExtended Power Uprate (EPU) License AmendmentRequest (LAR) No. 205: Regarding theEPU Related System Impact Study (SIS)," Accession No. ML103060107, October 29, 2010


L-2011-081Attachment 2

Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

GENERATION INTERCOMMECTION SERVICESYSTEM IMPACT STUDY

ATTACHMENT 2

This coversheet plus 47 pages

FPL EXTENDED POWER UPRATE PROJECTSTURKEY POINT 3 & 4

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY - ADDENDUM #2

3/23/2011

Summary:Florida Power. & Light Company ("FPL") has performed additional analysis to supplement theoriginal System Impact Study ("SIS", dated 11/25/2008) and its first Addendum (dated5/12/20 10) regarding the increased power output of the Turkey Point 3 extended power uprate("TP3 EPUP") & Turkey Point 4 extended power uprate projects ("TP4 EPUP"). This Addendum#2 incorporates FPL's latest revision to the Engineering Evaluation for the Extended PowerUprate, Revision 3 (March 9, 2011) which specifies a higher EPU Peak Winter Power outputlevel for both TP3 EPUP and TP4 EPUP than was submitted in the original application fortransmission service to add incremental generation at the Turkey Point ("TP") site. The originalsubmission specified an EPU Peak Winter Power output level for both TP3 EPUP and TP4 EPUPof 889 MWe, while the revised output level for both TP3 EPUP and TP4 EPUP is specified as899.8 MWe. The potential higher output of approximately 11 MW per nuclear unit under coldwinter conditions was analyzed for both thermal and dynamic stability impacts. Short circuitimpacts were not expected nor evaluated because the electrical characteristics of the generatorcomponents did not change significantly based on a review and comparison of the revisedEngineering Evaluation against the original submittal. In summary, the results of these analysesindicate that the potential higher winter output (22 MWe total) of the EPU projects does notadversely impact the transmission system and does not require additional upgrading of facilities.This result was expected because the cold winter peak conditions are less severe to thetransmission system in the geographic area of the Turkey Point site than hot'summer conditions.Due to the relatively small incremental increase, output results are very similar to the resultsachieved in the original system impact study and the first Addendum.

This System Impact Study Addendum #2 includes:" A review of the Engineering Evaluation Revision 3 Data Submittal;* Revised Loadflow Analyses for Designation as an FPL Network Resource:* Revised Dynamic Stability Analyses for selected contingencies

Theses additional analyses were performed in accordance with FPL's Facility ConnectionRequirements, NERC Reliability Standards (FAC-001, FAC-002, TPL-001, TPL-002, TPL-003and NUC-001-2).

The required changes to the transmission system identified in the original SIS and the firstAddendum were included as base assumptions in the additional analyses scenarios for thisAddendum 2. The requirement to replace the existing power system stabilizers is alsounchanged.

" The installation of two new 5 ohm inductors at the Turkey Point 230kV switchyard isrequired prior to the uprate of the second of two nuclear units (currently TP4, scheduled tooccur on or about December, 2012), to reduce the available fault current at Turkey Pointswitchyard to acceptable levels with both of the TP nuclear units operating in their upratedconfiguration.

* Reduction of the existing breaker failure back-up (BFBU) total clearing time at Flagami138kV substation from 15.3 cycles to 10.9 cycles is required.

* Reduction of the existing BFBU total clearing time at Davis 138kV substation from 13.3cycles to 9.9 cycles is required.

2

* New Power System Stabilizers are required for TP units 3 & 4 to improve oscillationsdamping.

The results of the additional analyses for this SIS Addendum 2 are as follows:

Engineering Evaluation Revision 3 Data Submittal ReviewA review of the revised data submittal indicated that the only significant change was that the EPUPeak Winter Power output level for both TP3 EPUP and TP4 EPUP was increased and wouldneed to be evaluated. The EPU Summer Power output level was-less than the previous submittal(851.7 MWe vs. 869 MWe) and did not need to be re-evaluated. The slight changes in some ofthe other modeling input parameters were incorporated in the analyses performed for the firstAddendum and applicable analyses in this Addendum 2. They are not considered material anddid not invalidate any of the results of the original SIS.

Loadflow Analyses 7

The loadflow analysis performed in the original SIS used in its assumptions the EPU winter peakand the EPU summer minimum output power levels reported in the Engineering Evaluation (Rev.2, June 30, 2008). As a result of the submittal of a revised Engineering Evaluation (Rev. 3,March 9, 2011) with a slightlyhigher EPU winter peak output power level for each generatorafter EPU, the loadflow results portion of the original SIS is revised in this Addendum 2.

The results of the contingency power flow analysis indicated that there were no overloads offacilities that resulted from the increased EPU output levels that could not be mitigated bynormal switching procedures. Also, no existing overloads in the cases were materiallyaggravated (more than 3%) due to the increased EPU output power levels. In addition, therewere no low voltages observed due to the increased EPU output power.

Dynamic Stability AnalysisDynamic simulations were performed using the latest available 2014 summer peak base case fordynamic simulations at both peak load and off peak (50% of peak) load levels with existingcommitments of all the companies in Florida. The 2014 summer cases include the latestavailable transmission and generation assumptions for dynamic simulation and are appropriatefor modeling the effects of increased. EPU output levels. (Winter cases are not developed fordynamic stability simulations because the summer case models the most pessimistic scenario forstability.) The.,base cases are modified for study by modeling the higher EPU Peak WinterPower output level for both TP3 EPUP and TP4 EPUP (22 MWe incremental to original studycases).

The results of the dynamic stability analyses all indicate that the system remains stable with noload shedding under all conditions simulated, and the post-transient steady-state voltages afterworst case contingencies are all within Nuclear Plant Interface Requirements ("NPIR") requiredranges. The detailed results of the simulations are contained in the following tables.

Table 1 - 2014 Peak and Off-Peak Loading with TP3EPUP (simulates 2012 before TP4EPUP)Table 2 - 2014 Peak and Off-Peak Loading with TP3EPUP and TP4EPUPTable 3 - Power Flow Analysis, 2014 Summer Peak Loading with EPU Peak Winter Output

for TP3 EPUP and TP4 EPUP

3

The following pages of this report contain the tables and associated plots for the analyses.

4

Table 12014 Summer with TP3EPUP (900 MWe)

Run ID Description Peak Loading Off peak Loading

3-pha fault at Turkey Point on Turkey System Stable System StablePoint-Levee 230kV line, BRK 90 fails Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MWAt 3 cy open Turkey Point-Levee line

C_01/C_ 11 at Levee and convert fault to SLG, At8.0 cy open Turkey Point-Levee lineat Turkey Point & clear fault atTurkey Point 230kV.3-pha fault at Levee 230kV on Turkey System Stable System StablePoint-Levee #1 230kV line. RELAY Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MW

C_02/C_12 FAILURE at Turkey Point. At 4 cyopen Levee end. At 28 cy clear faultand open Turkey Point end.

C_03/C_13 3-pha fault at Davis 230kVon Davis- System Stable System StableLevee #1 line, Mid BRK 96 fails, at Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MW4cy open Davis-Levee #1; at 9.0 cyopen Davis-Turkey Point #3 & clear Tfault.

C_04/C_14 3-pha fault at Davis 138kV on Davis- System Stable System StableVillage Green line, Mid BRK 31 fails, Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MWat 4cy open Davis- Village Green; at9.9.cy open Davis-Princeton & clearfault.

C_05/C_15 3-phase fault at Flagami capbank. Bus System Stable System StableBRK 67 fails. 10.9 cycles open Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MWFlagami S 138kV bus brks & clearfault.

5

Table 22014-Summer with TP3EPUP and TP4EPUP (900 MWe each)

Run ID Description Peak Loading Off peak Loading

3-pha fault at Turkey Point on Turkey System Stable System StablePoint-Levee 230kV line, BRK 90 fails Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MWAt 3 cy open Turkey Point-Levee line

C_06/C_16 at Levee and convert fault to SLG, At8.0 cy open Turkey Point-Levee lineat Turkey Point & clear fault atTurkey Point 230kV.3-pha fault at Levee 230kV on Turkey System Stable System StablePoint-Levee #1 230kV line. RELAY Loadshed 0 MW. Loadshed 0 MW

C_07/C_ 17 FAILURE at Turkey Point. At 4 cyopen Levee end. At 28 cy clear faultand open Turkey Point end.

C_08/C_18 3-pha fault at Davis 230kVon Davis- System Stable System StableLevee #1 line, Mid BRK 96 fails, at Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MW4cy open Davis-Levee #1; at 9.0 cyopen Davis-Turkey Point #3 & clearfault.

C_09/C_19 3-pha fault at Davis 138kV on Davis- System Stable System StableVillage Green line, Mid BRK 31 fails, Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MWat 4cy open Davis- Village Green; at9.9 cy open Davis-Princeton & clearfault.

C_10/C_20 3-phase fault at Flagami. capbank. Bus System Stable System StableBRK 67 fails. 10.9 cycles open Loadshed 0 MW Loadshed 0 MWFlagami S 138kV bus brks & clearfault. ,.

6

Table 3Power Flow Analysis - 2014 Summer Peak Loading withEPU Peak Winter Output for TP3EPUP and TP4EPUP

Turkey Point Grid voltage orScenario Event 230 voltage loading problems

PTN @ 1800 MWgross 241.14 noneTN3 EPU, TN4 EPU -

900 MW each PTN3 off, PTN4 tripped 239.53 none

PTP5 off, PTN4 tripped 238.09 none

7.

Dynamic Stability Plots for Table 1

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3 PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEBRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C: \home \pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 01 .outCh-4# 280: [A0GL 3301 CR RV G3 22.0001 1 - .

5 CHNL0 219- [ANG- 200[10TUCOE2 22.000111

01000.0 258, [-128 020S[TPSST0M 00.00018 1 -lo

150.00 CH-O 277, [A- 1283-TP5 BI 18-03;p - .000

CHN-0 276, (A ' 4{p.4 22.0003j= 0

k-00 210. 1[- 01 3[0TP 22.00011 -000.0

IS00.00150005505. 573 .00

I * .' • I I

0 I :

* i: I

* 14

0 II •1I '

0001

10~

1001

RU

0

2014 SUMMER PEAR LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC 01.out

=uF-I

...- -- o•" ..

. 0~. . .~~1-1=2 0 1.0S0000

10.050015000.0 3000: 1PMC 00 [ O ST CI E2S71 02.00010!II 0000I. o Q oo .o. .o .o.o

-05r1 # 007: [-MEC 0 017[TP51T70 18.000110i.osoo .. 05000

k _-c ý # 307, [PMEC 1283 [Tll-lB -IB U.0.00 .. o _]

c•• 305, [PMEc li~p, 22-01o11

1.0010[ . 0.05000 1

I: I

- 11

oFI

.'I

,I.I

.ii '

I I I I 0I

d 0

Oo

00

2014 SUMMER PEAR LD, 2009 FRCC LFDO (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR

DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 01.out

1>

z

.0101

H-


3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230EV LINEBRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11kMW\dyn\Run EPU C 01.5t10000 080. 100WR 305110 OV -0 22.000101

-0000 11000 [V-AnY 1 0.70000

i.2.o0

11.20..0000

15.ooo ... 5 . - 0 .0000

0 050: [00-0 200S1U.C1 22.00.. .. 0.0000 111..000 0 0 [ . . 0.000

C 284: [-OR 12-5TPSSTEAM -a.00)115 oo

1-0000 000.50. 000 0007070 0 .00001cK4283' [POWR 12B3 ITP5CTBI 1B5 QI, N oo

05.000282: 1 POWR 41TP.4 22.00011110.000 1 0.0000 d

inqL 281; [pOWR 3 tTP. 3 22.0001115.-7

'8 I

+: I

----

H

0

Co

0

z50

Page 1 of 40



3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,B K 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_01.outE,

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDS (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EP)! C_01.out -ow00

I-. - 1- .94 IET• 41T - -20 11

9.5000 -0.5000

-oC 2 10, [ 30 T- 3 02.000111Is.5000 • -0.5000

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I s• I•

L.

616.000 -7- 0 .00

-01000 -010. -4 -0 -0 -0500 1 -- 00.000

100.00 0100 o,0*0000000)o0.0

I Isq.-

0

00 0

00

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDS (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPUC 01.out 1-0

>

El0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LEOB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH CONDL 3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230EV LINE,BRK 90 FAILSLOAOFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9 \nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU C_01.outI 000000.0 274 000 00 E 00 00 22.00001] -- R G

I

r0.00000 . .... 0 -0.07 00 I

10.00000 0.......... 2 [- . .00[ . ..U0000 ...20 101 -0.02001[

o.oBooo . .. . .. . -- 2..oi100 0 C 2702, [SPD 0105[TPT.4 M 20.0001.1 - - - -0.00

0o.osooo 271 0,0, s f0 [B 00 01 -0.020000

I 0.000 270. [0SPD 4TP.4 22.0001-0

io.osooo 2- I-n 3[T0.3 22-oob -0.02000I I I I I I I

.010101

.00~LU

0

z00ou

0uw

Page 2 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

T 3PH FAULT 0LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\S1MW\dyn\Run EPU C 02.out

r 7750.00 - . - -oo.oI

i10 o.0. 00 270 , [ANG 1 2000 L3 -0.000 -) ... .- - 100.0

k. CDo 276: jANGL 4 ITP. 4 22.0001D

I 00.00 00. 07, 00 707 0 0 -000.0DoCNL 275, [ANGL 3 [TP. 3 22.000111

I-I

I Ii

* I I-

I , f10

0 7

- Ž-

00105

.01A

00(~)

0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR

DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUC_02.out

F 5.000 . - - 0.050000F 03090 0PMEC 200(STLUCIE2 22 000 -1;1- 5o , . ..oso Doo

[ 1.00 [0MEC 1-.0000M

F DI.0 0 30 7, [PMEC 12B0 ITP50 70 00.000- 0.0

il.osoo o- l ~ [P4 2 .01ý . osooo

C-4• foP[MEC •[TI., 22.000111•D.oDoo

j' I I i I I

: I

II.

i,:

9t1

II.

'IIII.

~I' I I I I I I

Kc

Di0

00

00So

10

+

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD' (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYS9R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_02.out

c0001. 70 )V-00070TOW000

1.2000

0.70

U)

10400>

01HDo

Do

E] 2014 SUMMER PEAK LD. 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR

DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCi G. TP3 EPU TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT 0LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#l LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOA!DFLOW=DY09.14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU C 02.out

1000000000010 000 R00 7000)70 0700 20,..o .000)0 -0oo

-0 2-00 1000 000)o• 7O0[00UCI0 00.00)0)

... 000 .o.0000

0C 6 084: po-R 1285[TPSrTA- 1.000)1 -

k00.000 0 0 0 - - 5.0ooo

105.000 C00L# 2630 00 WR 1283[TP(CTB0 4) 00.000)1 - - .00

1-1s 1-oooooll

-if

Do 0

02

Do0-

0

Do0

Page 3 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR "DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#l LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\hone\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUC02.out

oo~:

ME-o(ol

2014 SUMMER PEAR LD, 2"09 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUCO2.out

CHNL# 86:60-160° (FRO-pU•AM])

C95N0 294- -7 0E-. 4 1T0.4 22.0ooL o1 I.S0 0 2 1 -0.5000 -

0.00C00NL. 200, 10Tpm 2,TP.2 20.000101

I I I I "I I I §

0

(00.00 - - -~ 0.000

C~%•84, 60-(60-[fR0-C-0-3LT))

1.000 0 .4. .. . . 590.000

;. 000 1 00 00- o*60' [FR0-0NCH] "

C1#. 0060 - 00.000

I I I I I I

'--7

Su

02U0~

-0

i

2014 SUMMER PEAR LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV-ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C_02.out

L• 300: [EFD 4fTp 4 2 -000111

-.0

-u

RX

-0

2.74e ooo 3301 . . .R G -0.0200 I

2730•0 1 0 SPD 200ISTLCIE2 22.000111

-B~oooo 00001 "00 2000 " 0000 - X -o oooo I10.000 201 00, 20 28020000......0020 -0.0200

• #272: [SPD 1285[TPSSTýM 18 ýo00)11o-eooo -0+ H

io- ooo 211. ISPD 1283[ITPSCTBI "18 .0001-1] -- - -

1o.ooeoo 0200020 00 20. 2OO0 .... -0.0200o-oooo

C 2-9 1S- 1 [TP.3 21.00-111o.osooo -0.0200

I I I I 1 1I

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYI LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc -uprates\sis\TP\IiMW\dyn\RunEPUC_02.out

020

Mm02~

0001

0

Page 4 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDE (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE 81 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\h6me\pxgOddS\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU C 03 .outC950.0 280: ANGL 33010CR RV G3 22.000)11 -- - --

000 279, 5AN5L 2001•07t0CIE2 I0.000lli o

h.150 -0F0w 2780 00GL 12:07'5TSS2AM 00.00011) . .- i00 0

1001 277: 1200 1283 3TPSTBI -2000001) -.000.0

00


3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE 41 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddO\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUC_03.out0C0 310, [PMEC 3301(CR 00 03 22.000)11

'1.0500 - . - 0.05000

1.000 2CHNL0 309, 0PMEC 20 0Q 1UC 2 02 22000110

0.50 - h 00 o1 000, C 1000 2050090000A 00.00011 t -]00001.0500 0.5000_

SC-*L 307: [PMEC 1263[TPS-Bl -eooocl1 o

1.osoo2.0050001.50 1250L0 200, 2000 41T2.4 -2-.0005000

11.0500021 00, 20F 22. 2201 .0052I11.o o 0- o.osuooo

..-.0- --.- --1,I IPM-. 3 17P. 3 2 I I I

'1'

'1 /

"PI

8t10

-II ,

' 'II

,1I

............1......i , I I I I

--S

H

1.20

Do

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDS (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS - FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUCO3. out

I .- 000 .... - 0.70000

CN#71: V-TURKY P)

I i I i I I I 0 0i,7-

:,1

4

' I -

-103of

U)3E.>

0•

U-


3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\h6me\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\lDMW\dyn\Run EPUCO03. otI ~ -2000.ý00, I00--000-)200000-002-!1 ]

......- a 2r - ,[ .0 .- .1.. .. ...... - - - -- -

15.000 02 0001 .l 5.0000

CN 283+ [PO-R ý200S- CE [ 22.0- -]iw2.00 - -- - -- 5.0ooo0

215.000 1o 23 0 2.00011

CH # 22,: [1R0 0 4 TP 3.4 -2.000-1 5,000 l

[05.000 00w20 20 )23 2.01)500

C I LI 28 :IIR [P 3 22 o o 1

I I

,I - --

I/

5. -

' \'

\. (,-.3

C

u5

:'3

00

A

Page 5 of 40

Dvnamic Stability Plots for Table I

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (B/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_03. out

CHONLO 054, [00TR0 4[T1.4 02.00010 1I

i 9.5000 - -0.5000 4

T-6 293, [-•M 3 1. 22.000111F9.00 00000 5,100 00. 0000 -0.5000I

I I I I I { {

-"[p2

C1-'

~0o0.)

-'to

N


l 3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS( LOADFLOWDY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_03.out

C-N# 86, 60-(60-[PR0-PUT 1)]610.000 0005090 0-00 P000t~t~ - - - -

-#o00 64: 60-(10"I0RQ--l0O5) I- -

.0 0.. . . . . * 59.000CHNLA 83: 60-(60-[FR0-F•CH))

-10Oo- 0

CýýO 82, 60.(60"[FR0-FLAG-lZ)61.000 s 5 .000

I { ' l F ,

~07

-oto[o3000p~

to~

00

It

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 PRCC LFD, (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PM FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14S04.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY89R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_03.out E-o



FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\RunEPU C_03.out

toO

.0

'04

9.5000 -- - -0.5000o

00050.-# 299: [00 30TP. 3 22.00011)

0.5000ý_ L ----- 050

9.5000

(

)

)(

00.

1o.osooo 000.. . 000 0000 01 ....... .. ..0 . . - o.000o-0 00 l# 2-00 [500 2001STLUCTE2 22.00011-

o.0so ... ; . . x - 02ooJ • #272t [SPD 1285[TP5ST-M 16.00141

J00 0 00000.0 270. 05000 0712031T0SCT0 00.0001011-.00

0 C0000.0 270, [D: 4[TP.4 22.0001-10

-0.0000 0 0 317P.3 22. -0.0200

I II I I II

to 04

50

Page 6 of 40



DYNAMICS. FERM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\ nc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 04.out

00.0- 0 - - - - - o-10.0

050.00COt! '70. 10001. 0001.~000 2 00 00011-

0000L1 070.18001 0AG 285 lT05STEA4 08.000111

05o0.0- 0.0

-0 277: [•L1293 [TPSCTB 1B00 -- Y

050.00 CCHOL 276, [A0GL 40TP. 20o000111 - .000.0

CHNL# 275, 1- aA 3[TP.0 22.000111

k -.

I I,

I'* I

- I

- - > ,

['I

-.

01103

.8.3

01~

010

08()


3PN FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID SRE 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\hcoe\pxgodd9\nuc-u.prate\osis\TP\llMW\dyno\Run EPU C 04.out

11.00o0 '' *. - - - 0.oso0 0

5 3o901 PmEC 200 00 8 000,S0-UCIE2 22 00D1]I- 1-~o oIooo

I C}010101. 700. 10P400 000851T0S10T0M 0.000)1] - - 0000

-. osoo 000 .1. .I .00010. 0. 1040 00 00500 0 .0.0000]

10C-00 306: 0 PMEC 4[TP.4 2-.000]10

I C00H.0 0 m00• 105 0 0 [TP.3 22.0001110

, II, ,

'1.1

'11

Ei,:

................... . i ; 1 ' I I I I 8

08

0oUn 10

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDS (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3 PH FAULT @DAVIS 128KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc--uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU_C_04.0out

0.2000 0.70000

011121. 67: IV-FLAGA•I)0.2000- 0.0000

0• -00. IV-TURKEY 010.20000 .00

lo

go0>

0

uH

2014 SUMM4ER. PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH CONG

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 [email protected], SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPU_ C04.001S20.. 11PO00 . 00010 RV 01 2-000- l l1

151.000 5. ... 0• 00000125,• 2 [: POWR - [-S'nU-2E 22-0o111

ooo 075.1000100 0000100 00 ..... 0.0008]

i 55.000 C # 284: (POWR 0 185 10T0STEAM 08.000). _ - - - ,

I 's.oo 28a0 8 POW 1261 [-5-53 0 T 10 - - -000181 0.000

15.000 00 2 0 1 0 41-4 22.00 .0000]

1-000 2810 1. POWR 20 TP.0 3 22.000111 0.000

. 7

I.I

'" N

K-

F-I

0

10

Page 7 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 ,RCC LFDO (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1M0w\dyn\RunEPUC_04.out

9.5 0CHNL 294, [ETM 4 [TP.4 22.000101

CHNM#"2930, 1ETM 30[7. 22.000111

9.50000 -0.000

I = I

ol



FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\iiMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_04.00u

00>4

-- U2Z

om04G~00(00

C•e 86: 60+t60" [FRO-pUTNAM] %

61 .000 S9 - -- 00.000CN 84, -60 -[0*FR0-C]-0LTE))

61.000 -4 - - - -19.000CHNL# 83; 60"÷(60-[FR0-ANCH])

61 .0000 > l S0

CHW04 81, 600(600 1FR0 FLAGAMI0)

SI I Ij z

10

I

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 PROC LFDS (8/24/09) MODIFIED. FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC04-.0t -109

o>-o

.5-El


3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYS9R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_04.outCHNL# 274' ISPD 0 -0)[- -0 22.000111

C00000*• 2000 4 [000 4)TP.4 20.00011)

0.0000 - - .0.5000

00000 299. [000 3T[.. 220.00011)

i I I I I

/

'1

0i

0o+o8000 I - - - 0 -.0.0200 1

10.06000 CO5L# 273, [010 2001-0U-C2E2 22.000111 -0.00 iIo~oaooo 060 0. [0 250S006 0000 -.. . , -0.0200CH #272: ISPD 1285[TP5STEA -800011]0.oso0 -o0-0o

CN# 7 1 -SD 12831ITP5CTBI 18000ol1111.0ooo0 -0.0200

C-00# 2700 [SPD 4 [TP.4 22.0001j41o.o0ooo 6 0 .0

CHNL# 269: I SPD [T.3 0

F14

UI

N S~0

Page 8 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDE (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK G7 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 05.outC000# 280: [A-G 3301[CR RV G3 22.000W 2 - - -I

15.0 - .. . -7 d

2-5-1 2-.,001

S278 [AN-L 12851T-5-T0 16.000)0] 100

C.0 277, ANGL 1[ O3TP5CTBI - .000.. Y

050.00 -00, 7.1001 47. 2000 000.0

C-60, 275. 1A1 3[T-3 2-.000)1]050.00 • -000.0o

(I,

js2 0

_ o" •¢

0203'.03

000

~r23z01I~

0-U

U


3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nnuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU C 0S.out0 0 -0, 3 10 000PMEC 33010CR RV G3 22.000]10

.0500 ..... - 0.05000C•#309: IPMEC 200 ýSTýUCIE2 22 .000131

C-4ZL 308, [PMEC 1285[T?-TEM 1s8000]iý

1.0500 0.05ooo

ý0 307, 1o000(PMEC [2510 0 00.o1- - 0 0

S306, (PMEC 4IT[.- -0).oo]1 .0500 0000, 707, Ill.0 I00 00 0 n0.000)1 -l - d

I; I •.,,

II. I''~i1 Tj

I.

.11

q'I

4t1

II.

;•: , I I I

KýF-

SO

U 2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR

DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCOHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH CONE,3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunSEP0_C_05.out

0. 2000 0010.....I-0000000010.700000

0.2000000,07 vF,000 0.00I

1.2000 0.70000

.0

oH

02

2014 SUMMER PEAR LD, 2099 FRCC LFDO (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANOK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOADFLOW=DY09S14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C.\home\pxg0ddg\nuc-uprates\0si\TP\SlMW dyoo\Run EPU C_05.out

105.000 500, 00 00 000 05 2000 ... • ~o105.00 N1, 005, 1 200ISTLUCIE2 22.000110

1C5.000 284. 10000 -1 [T 000 0.0001] 5.0000

I 030, 0 28: P OWR 1283ITP5CTBO 1B.000]l I

E-

03

ii

01

Page 9 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LIDS (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. 1BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUC_05outo,

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 PRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY0954-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgcdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_05.out

00>0

0o2

000

0000

0100o

0.5000 A - -5.CkILO 293:, 1-0M 3[TP 3 22 00101 I

0.5000 R - -0.5000

S I I I I ~ I I I } I

H

z00

1H.000 - -. 000

-00.00 00101* "4, I0 5f00COOLTI

06,0000 02 84 t 60- (6D0- FRD-0l TE] - - - - -

- #:?r• 83, 60- (60. IFR0•-R CH] )

610.000 50.000O-I 4 81, 0 (6 [FR-LA 161-000900

OU

0


3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DYE0914SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= PY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\hooe\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU C 05.out El-o

:.0I >

0E

2014 SOMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBAMK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\hom e\pxgdd9\ nc-uprates\sis\TP\1M9W\dyn\Run EPU C 05.out

-H014 3000 1EFD 4150.4 22.0001)1L _ - 00

001NL# 000. [E000 01TP.0 02.000101 000

I

-.- 5

G -s

3

00

0.08000 0 . - o ._0.0200CHNL# 273, [SPD 200[STLUCIE2 22.000111

0.06000 . . ... . -0.0200

0000 . 272: [0p1 1285(TP5ST-AM 18.000o

0.000oo -0100 00 07. oooo ~ 0.0200CHNL4 271- WSD •SySTI Z.01

0.00000 2 -. -0.0200

CHNL# 270: [SPD 4[T- 22.000111

CHNL# 269: [SD 31TP.3 22.00011]

I I I I I 0

o

z0u

Page 10 of 40


2014 SJUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

L LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014 .FILE: C:\home\pxgo0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 110.cut

Osonoo - ... - -ooo.ol

200. 00 0-- - -- 7 _0 01

CHnO• 279, rANL 20Q0IST1,1CIE' 22 001111. o.o . .. . .. - oo~

CHI-0 0787 1-ANG 1281STPTAM 1 -10000i0200o.00 -2oo.o

0 .02770 1-N 1 1-5-1 18.0001 - --- - - -0 .0

190.00 ~-0.

, -L I I I I

Ci 23

O II

* I

* >) 00

° - . - _- 0 -

080

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2

(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEBRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-SD.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg0ddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_ll.out

1.0500 200 0.05000

200000. 3009. I.- 172[ST1UC0E 00.000oo11.0500 . . . . .0. 0 0 2. 0

2000.30.0002 40040 001O .O0000C-4 30; IPMFC 12B3 TPSCTBI IB ---0- 0

Ct-NL 306, [PMEC 4 [TP.A 22-00o ýi

k.0500 o.osooo

8:I xi

,I

8'1I

,I

I I 0

0

oO

00

i

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT 'TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_11.out 10

0>

i ).10

2014 SUMMER 00% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDBP REV.2

(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY00 14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C11. out

1.2000 0 0.0.70000

k .0 CHIC# 67: V-FLAA1 1 0.70000

2,... 0.700000

I

4

* 4)/~

,0'

15.000 1 . . 0.0000 I280 ; 0. -WR 210028[-ST 0 10.00011)

is.ooo 5.0000

C ýN # 283- [pO R 12835[TPS EM] 28. 000 1) .

k,.000 0 -. 0000

cft#282: tPOWR 4 [TP.~B 4 .ooo)l100000 - .0000

1-09.000# 22000900 CpOWR 41T0.0 00.000101 - .00

k 6.5o

.)

is~ooos~ooo

-, i I i

EloH

C48

802

802

00

oo z

10

Page 11 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/0), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU TP2 SYNCH COND

3PM FAULT @TUIKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEBRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run_EPUC_ 11. out

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09). MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Ru _EPU C 11.out

00>4

--U

-oO

CH-# 294, [-M09 4[TP.4 22.00011]9.5000 -0.5000 3

0.000COOOLO 200, 10E0M 3[TPA 3 2000010]-.50

I I I I I I I IzC

- O

1.000 - - - 59.000 ICONLO 64, 0 (0- [FRQ-CH-0LOTE0 )

61.00 - .-

61.000 CHNL# 83, 00-(6 0- 000 1 -. 000

000 C-# 01, 600<I 0-0L ý104 -o.

50 0 0I I I I I SO

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT 14TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,B RE 9) FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S5.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\ilMW\dyn\Run EPUF_C_11.0t

Eo

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/509) MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @0TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09E14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C ll.outC-05 2740, ISPD 3301[CR RV G3 22.000111

00

0E-o

-u

.SOOO - -- 0.5000

I I I

-o --

- --

T

50

o0.0 0oo . - -0.0200

1o{N00 273, [SPD 20010SLUCIE2 22.000110o. 0ooo ; .... - -0.0200]

0. 650 C - # 272, [SPD -2 8 5 S TM 1 -000)21)

10.0000 0 000, 0, [O 104 2.011 - - -0.0200ýn#. 271: FSPD -1 f31TpS~Bm, .O~

00000, 2700 [0000 01T0.2 22.00010010.00000

20 0-0.0200

I I I I 1

I I I I I I

0>2

(01

Page 12 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2 ,(8/2 /09)F MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU T TP2 SYNCH CONF ,

/3PH FAULT MLDVEE230KV ON TD KY POINT#C LINE,RELAY FAIL 2TCYLOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C :\home\pxgodd9\nucr-uprates\sis\TP\i MW\dyn\Run_EPO C_12.outC-N.1 21-, 1... 3010 C. -V -2 22.0001-11

I 00.00 - . . . - -200.0

CHNLf 00 [27 -GL 002-STLUC0 E2 22.000111I 00.00 .. .. -000.0

1 27B, [ANGL 12851-S0TST M 16 0001.

CHNLq 277, [AN-L 12030 TPCTBI 1.0001B.iso.co 000.o0

0. 2060 [AN-L 4[TP.4 22.0001- 0

H1 275, 1A L 310TP3 22.0001) 1115-0 -o.oI

I i I •I I• ' •I • I '4

(- . \o

F')'

* /

'00

O )

¾,1

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT OLEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#l LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY0914SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd\nuC-ulprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyO\Run EPU C 12.out000010 200, [0M8 30122001C0 0V G3 2.0001]1

1.05000 - -- -. 0.00020

..00 0-0402.1 3080 PMEC 12B5[T-S-TE0M 18.000141 0.0- 000]

10.050 011 0,11000 25-000 0000 8 0.050000

1. 00s1 00 [PMEC 1283[TPCTBI - -100011 - --- 050

I 0.0000 . 300 4 10EC 410.0 0 -0.0 0

-100 300 1 1-SEC 30 TP 3 220 W 011

. .. I- . l I I I' 1 I I F

t:1

I F

I I

i . --

i j.[ I I I I I

o

o

oo0002

z

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

I 3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINE,RELAY FAIL 28CYL LOA/DFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014 .

FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPLUC12.out

<,,

o

0. 20 00 010 # 33, [V-A0 O0.70000 10.0000 0110, 67, 1V-FLAGA10 0

0. 20-00 01 71: P1-0 0 0.070•02

I I

I)

I

2

01

0.1

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

•3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINE,RELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY89_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuoc-uprate\sis\TP\lýMW\dy \Run EPU_C_12.out

6 RG 22.0000

C0010 20- [0WR -[10-ST702 02.000110000

150008:{OR 2STPSEM 18001

CHN# 283, [POWR 1253 (TP5CTB3 18 0001!ý----] 0

-010 212: 1P.- I 4ITP.4 22.00011.

s0000

.01

I II .1

7

000

6)

00~~

~.0

10~

~50

~8 - - - - - -

-.

0

oS

I I [ I • . . . . • . . . . i g , ,

Page 13 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2

(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_'14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOTw FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_12.out

OF-. 2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2

(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PN FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 12.0ut0:D

000, , 0. 00 [FRO-puT00A,41)

9 CANLO 294: [-0M 4(T-P. 22.0o11._01_

i o CHNLet 293, I-TM 3 P. 2. 0001110.5000 • -0.5000.

I I I I I I I I " I I

161.000 59.000Am L 4, : Go÷60- [FRD-C -.RLTE:))

61.00-- - - - - sg.000

CHNL• 83,: 60. (60- (FR0-ANCHj)

6 o.oo0 00- 81, (6 0 1 - 1 1

I I 1I I I I I

0

oz0

00o0

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINEKELAY FAIL 28CY

( LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_12.out

CHK0L0 300: 0EFD 4 [TP.4 22.000)019.000 -0.5000

k.C50 2005 0. D 30[T00 .3 22.0001]- 0

)

) _

'0

I I I 1 • " , -- i I I

E-o

-o:00

Elo

p

04-

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CY

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C;\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run_EPUC_12.out

1o.0sooo k . - -. .- -0.00001

273, [SP 200 [S - 22.000111

So. no#o 272, [SPD 12 0 [T005 ST [ A ) - - -, -0.00001IO.OBO00 -ooo00. sn oorocoooo~o~00 2710 SPD 1 0.3 [T -T -0.02001

- - -00 -o-o oo

C-000 2 790: ISPD 4 [TP.3 22.000]i] o 2.00.00010

10.08000 00000 290 [50 0 1 P.3 2-00111 -0.0200

I I I Iy

..1o20000

02

0H

50

Page 14 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgldd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUUC 13.out

0s0.00 7 .. . - -100.0

C5 219' o ANGL 200isT1UCIE2 2-000111

C-1 278, 12851TP5ITEAM 1.000]i - - - -10

050.00 000000 XOI 00IOOB 001]-000.0CHNL# 277: I: 12E3[TP5CTBI 18.00`oIS

*sooo-000

I- k 276, 0ANGL 4[TP.4 22.000i

C6 2 7 5 , IA N G L 3 1T P .3 2 1 - o0. 1

lso~oo -lo0.

I 3 -- (. -

-'-3

Az

00 H00~0:

000

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT ODAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgoddgn\uc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RnEFPUC_13.out

10. 00 00 •~ . . . . 0G.05000

I 0.000 0C00 309 0 IPMEC 200 00TU 02 .0022 00.0.000

I.0500 -41 3080 IPMEC 125TP5STEAM 8 0001. 0l - - - I

1I, o5000

0000 - 1 3060 07 PMEC o121T0S0700 0.50000

I.00 000r.0 000. 10M00 4 170.4 00.00010. .1.00

- 4 3D5, IPMEC I[T- 22 000)1ý1

I p

I ,0

' I I

, i

, I I '

SI

I 0'

' iI -

, i I I l I I

oo 0

'00'

-i

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FALT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\hom

e \ pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\lIMW\dyn\RunEPU-C_13.out

1.2000 0.o0000

000C01 0 6 7 : IV - 0 A G A l _ _ (

0. 0000 0.70000

, (

- --

i-/

00

,00

2014 SUMMER 00% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT GDAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S5.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\ho.e\plg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC 13.out

00.0850 01 200. [000 0000100 02 0 2 2.0001011

5 .0000

105.000 00000 .284, [POWR 120S[T00 2 TAM 00.OO1l] 5 .00o

S105.000. 10000.- 0 s .ooo I01.00# 2800 [POWR 41ITP. 0.00010]0

1i00.0 00-HN# 281, [POWR 3[TP.3 n2.000]i]

k 0.oo

1 I

0=

~1 -

0~ I

I -

.07

0, /

I

"'0.

.5 (-3

C'

0 -

- '-4

'00 -

FC0

00

0 0 ~ I *I I

Page 15 of 40

Dynamic Stability Plots for Table I

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

( LOADFLOWDY09 _14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_13.out

OEH

9. sooo - - - -7 .

-oNL 293, I-TM 3[T- 3 2-.00111)t]0-o0.5000 - -0.5000

I I I I {§

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDI REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nud-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C_13.ou0

610.000 sgl000 0

. .. - # 84: &0,(60*(FR0- - -OT)) - -- 5.0

60.000 590000,00 0f050.OCII~.000 I]ci.. - 0 63 60-f60*[RO--PAA 1)

C-#.000 810 00 00 1FRO-FLAGM: a 59.000

I I I I I I I

U

~o

0

0'

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU_C_13.out -103

o>

E-o-o

N

xu

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND.3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C: \home\pxgOdd9 \nuc-Ouprates\sis\TP\ iMW\dyn\Runo EPUC 13.

I.-0 000, f001 0-10 -0 0 0\ o010-

out

C-004 3000 [EFD 4[Tp.4 22.00011]I9.5000 -0o.S000

k 01.L# 009: [ED 31TP.13 22.000D)1I .S0000f - -000

I I I I I I i I

I

8

I0

) 0

1o.0oooo .. - . - -0.0200I 0CHNL0 2730 [SPD 200[STLUCIE2 22.0001100.000 . 0 10 0 0 . .- -0.0200

.C.. .. C # 2 72 : (SPD 12 B S[TP5S -T M - -00 )] ý - - 0 0

0.0o0sooo90 s0 08 0000 -0.0200Il. l.-.• 111. 1S- I2 T-BTBI 18.000111

c0.000800 -# , 0 0 0 . 22.o00 .. . -0. _02I-HN# 269, [SPD 4[P4 22 . O01 110,080000l 000CHONtO 000. 100D 0[T0.0 02.000111 -. 00

I I I I

0.0N

H 02.

SI

S

ý310

Page 16 of 40

Dynamic Stability Plots for Table 10140~

I2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-5S.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\RunEPU C 14.0ou

C-NO# 2-00 [A-0 2301[CR RV G3 22.000)1150.0oo " . -I00.0

201 100 079. [AN1 L 200 S1--CO- 2.0 00 11oI 050 00 .I .

600 H 2-4 78, 1A- 12851TP5STAM 1600011 . .. .-+ 00o. o

1 .5 0. 277, 1ANG0 12830 TP0C00 10 8.0001 1.

z

.0.

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDR REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND 03PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINE,MID BR•K•31 FAI•2-" -

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S5.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014 ,FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPU C 14.0ut

C-Nt 310: 0 PMEC 3 301(CR RV G3 22.0004 .

I 00 309' IPMEC 2000STLUCI0 0 22,000111 0

I o.osoo 00. 0.INC1010570 0..0001 ... - 0.05000

kI CHN0 0 308, IPMEC 1285 0T0STEAM 00.000101 0.050001 I-

k 101. 00.. ..... .. . .... .10 _00.0.0 3065 [7770 .107.0 22.0001.1

I CHNL# 3D5, [PMEC ý[TP- 22.0-111

1. 0500

I iJ I I' I I 10%0l19;2

I I-

I ,

9, I 0

.i: I I , r I I

I I I

2014 SUMMER 501 LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/001, MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

l LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\RunEPU_C_14 .0u

0.2000 0100 0 1-0001 -. . $~ 0.70C 00000 67: 0. L-FLAGA 1

71 [ - )0.000

01

z1

00011

E-A

[1 2014,SUMMER 50%1 LOAD LEVEL, FORM INTERC..N iPRcc 7777rEVý 2-8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCHCOND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BP4K0-31",FAILOADFLOW-DYO9_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014 "

FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMWkdyn\Run EP C 34oot-.

I00 01 286. [0WR 33001[CR 70003 22.00011 -- - _2-oo (1 -- _ .3 2• s1oo

- 0 000 285, [pOWR 200[STUC IE2 22.00011,

0s.ooo 284 [ 1285 5 1.00011 . o 5 i

115.000 0... ... 28 1 ... .. 1 1-.5-3. .. ..000..

I 0.0.2.. 28 0: 7 .... . 0. ..4 2 .2 00 0 00 0 -I0 ..000 02 0

0 HL 2El1 [POWR 3 [TP:3 22. 00011

- ~1~

.121

t904 0Do

1-s000 S 0000 I

I I I I

I I I

Page 17 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.28/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ISKV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAX

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_14,out

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIP• INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_I4SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TF\1lMW\dyn\Run_EPU C 14.out

00z0

041

C 0 294: [-0RM 4[TP.4 22.0001})9.S0000 ~- -SO

SC0000t8 029: [00T0M 01T0.0 22.00000]

0-5000 0 - -0.0000- 2- 1. I . I 111

I ~ ~ ~ o s I I I•1 I 00000.00

10-.-0- - - - .- 0090 oI

100.000 000000.0 041 00- 000. (005-ELCOOO,0l)I - - s~o

I oooo~ 000. 00:00..00 l00.0.00001l - -00.0

100.00 000000 4 00.100 P050I,00000 0 9.000

10

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgqdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_14.out

.oO

E-

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU . TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID E3RK 31 FAX

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg0ddg nbc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyo\Run EPU C_14.outS000W.0 004: I0-00.0 0 -0 "10 00000000

9.500000-5-

_6 000 299t0, 1-0 3 [00.0 3--22.00012) - -0.0000

I I I I9

>1

o.osooo.... " -" -0.2000CHNL# 273, [SPD 200[STLUCIE2 22,0001]

. .0.0. 0 - 200

-4 00005 272: 0SPD 1280300 A 0.000)1 -0.0200o~oeooo-oo2oo

i .0 00 C-000 270: 0SPD 028[TPST. 2.000- - - -0.-00

I Co000 070: 2 0SP 4 0[T.4 22.0001-)o~osooo1.00000. 00: 000000.0 00.0000)-0.02000

I I I I I I

jfI I I0

00

004100~

Dl

U

z00

00.

000100

Ku

Page 18 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.I LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgO0dd\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC15.out- 0Cm2 28_0: [-A00 301[CR V 00 22.00G3 1(

0s.00oo,000 001 001000 22 00 .. ] -100.0o

10.0 +1002 270, 10AN0 0201?0PST7U00E 22.000111l , 100

0000 205002022 2520010011

160.00 -100.0

20

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOADFLOW=DY09S14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 15.out

- *0022 3100 [PMEC 3300 0CR OV G3 22.000111 IF .0100 - --- - 0.100

1.-0 309: 0 PMEC 200(1-10CE2 22.0001.1 0. 000

00.00001kC7 0 - 308- [PMEC 1285[TPSST M 18.000111 0 _050

k ,50100 C3 4 307 ; [PMEC 1283[TP5CTBI 18 001]; 050

- 4h 306! [PMEC 4 ITP 4 22,0001jý=10.00 0000507 (0O0 202000 0 0.0000

10.3050 [PMEC 0[TP.3 22.00010 0

10.050 0020 0 0, (00 1203 0.0(10.01000

*******-I--***** l j I I II I I I 2

IS .

i .I i

, , I

I" I

I /

,.-

" I I I I"

a C)

PH

Uo

1010

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFD8 REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CApBANK_ BUS BRK 67 FAILS-

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU_C_15.0ut

.E-o-02

02

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDS REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOADFLOW=DY09S14SR4-S5.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddS\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\SlMW\dyn\Run EPUC 15.0ut

C000 1. (: V-AN01000T 0,0001.2000 . . .

0.2000~~~~ 00000-(-000.0 - -* 0.70000]0000# 67: [V-FLAGA0 !]

0.2000 0-o.70000

115.ooo 5 -.000- 0 28-:, O 1 T 0 0. 0 0.0001

k1.0 -01000 204 , (2000 021(285 1200 10.00(1 - - - 5.000515.0001.O0000

11h .o00o 0070 2B3: PW 12810TP0CT1 8 -5 1-.000:! I51 0 000000282; 2 POWR 4[TP.4 22.00011.

15.00 0 2 ( 0.00

C. 53 2BI [P- 3[TP,3 22.0001

7o

" 2

8.

'0 -

-. ZI .

H

w02ý n)

20

20 z10

Page 19 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDBE REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT EFLAGAMI CAPBAUK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU C_15.out

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\hom\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\ilMW\dyn\Run_EPU C_15.0u-

01

k .CHNL 294: [E-M 4 [TP 4 22.000 119.5000- 000I

CL 2-3 1ET- 31TP 3 22 0001110.5000 •- -0.5000

I I I } I I. I {

161.000 1 - - 5.000 I8• 4, 60.(60*IF--CH-0LTEl)

60.000 ...... . 59. 00SB31 60.(60-[FR•+-CH1)

60 .000 0 69- -. , 00

[6.000 50,0.O-0I I I

z4~0 z050

.4,

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBAMK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

( LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 10.0ut

03

-uixWro

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3 EPU , TP2 SYNCH CONED3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOADFLOW=DY09S14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_15.out

0 0274, [SPD 3301[CR RV G3 22,0001-]o~~osooo_ . . -00200

-0.000 CH#L 273, [SPD 200[ST-UC--2 22.00011 - -0.0200

,0 272, [SPD 1285[TP5ST- -- 1.0001]0.0o0oo -o,0-00

C', 271: 1-P 12831ITP5= 1 ler'no•IlK.09 200 -0.0200

02 270: [0SPD 4Tp.4 22.000(P 0

C1-0.00L 260. [010 21P. 22.0001 0 Io .0.0 -ooo0

-04003

01

05.6900 - -0.50000

-.500 -0S I I I I I 1

I7

) .

.4.

00

Bu4

B0

8

Page 20 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PM FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\R1ounEPU C 06.0ut

00.- 260 (ANGL' 33 18000 'R 0002

650.00 -•

2- T 2200011100

iso-0n C1N-#1 278 : [A-0 L 1265[T-SSTEAM 18 0 00101 -000

isonoCHN.r 277,[01001. 0260 [07OCT01 06010

10 00 276. 0. j0- 4 TP.4 22.000111.

15.00 0 0CHNL0 275 0 IANGL 3170.0 2.000111 -100.0

I I I ",I I- ¶ 00

- 1'

_ ,~ •, to

\A

I I I " I -

10(o

u~

2014 SUMMER PEAK LI, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR

DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09S14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\ilMW\dyn\RunEPU_C_S06ut

-- . - 0a. 0500 '- . . . 0.0000

00# R, C00 ,S0 2E 2 "...0001n1. 0500000010

0 308 , [PMEC 12850 TP0 STEAM 0 80000. 00

-1.000 0.00001.0500 000 1000

k .0CHNL# 305, IPMEC I17P. 3 22 . Q00 1 1a0500

I J'" I I I I I I I

-O.I

El ,

- -

I..1...... j 1 I I I I

01.

00

8010

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FORM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEBRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09S14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYS9R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_06.out

gU3

0>

z

03

2014 SUMMER PEAK LO, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PM FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\HunEPU C_06.outI 0081.01 00000 r 07w 8 018l07 70.000•00o111 - --

1..000 . . . . . 0.70000

0. 20000 008CH # 67: [ -FLAGAM1 1 0 . ...

1. 0000V- P) 0.7000

I I :11 I I I I

,I888

150.000 1- . - - - s7771.0-N• 285: POWR 200[STUCIE2 22.000111

15.ooo C~n, IL#284,• (POWR 1285[T-ST-M l~o~ /• . . . 5oo

1 50 . 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 3 -[ P O W R 1 2 8 3 1 T P 5 C T B 3 1 8 . 0 0 l l - - - -0-0

-00# 208. [PowR (0A 12[ 0 12.000. 10I11.0000000

-00# 281. [POWR 30TP.3 22.000111 0.000

m I n ii I t

ix

H

,7F7

003

020~O2

N8080

00

Page 21 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU C 06.out

OH

'P

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFID (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\SlMW\dyn\RunEPUC 06.out-r..

o

OHI

9.5000O -0.5000

COOUO• 29>: [0TR0 0(9T.0 2.00901 I0. SOO -. 000

--- o

k } - 0 1 3 IP 3 {2 13=

61.000 59.000

1~ .ooo -04- 0 - - -- 0.ooo

1.000 - oo. I..... 0 5 09.000

I S I ,o0-U

-

0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEORK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\lM6W\dyn\Run EPU _C_06.ot

o>

oH

.-u

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD,. 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230EV LINE,BRK 90 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE, C:\home\pxgO0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 06.outHi-9000 2"4 [S00 3301[CR V G3 2.0001100 0

o.o7ooo 0 .0.0200

I- 0 , : [00 200[STLUCIE2 22.000)1) - - - 0.00

000.00010S000 9 .0 1 .. ..1 0.200 0272; [SPD 185TP5 A -000000.O8000-0.0200

0.08000 CHNL# 271: fSPD 12831T-5-T1 18 -0-00-] -

000

DI

F-0N1# 300: [EFD 4[-.4 002.0001011

19.5000 .0.5000 1

z

z

0

H

Page 22 of 40


U 2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

j3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYo LOADFLOW=DY09Y14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYOgR4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxqoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyno\Run EPU C 07.0Ut

050.00 OOOOIO28c: [A-00 0300)00 RV 00 122 0)0(11 - -~

15o.o00 C-400 270- 1-ANG 200(STLUCIEO 22- 000101 -000 "

C-#o 27B,0 1- 1 25•S M. 0 2 500o1. .-000 1

SCHNL# 277, [ANGL 123 Tp5CTB 220 I•iS .oo - -000.0 -

050.00 ~ - 2-01 [-,1001 4[TP.4 0.011 - -0.

0098

3100

0098

00 H

0000U

0

2014 S01MOER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE23OKV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CY F-.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\gnc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPUCO7.out H

10_05# 000 00, 1200 0005m 33 'S00000001 -_ -_ m.05000 I1.. 0 .. . . . o.osooo

[0.050001000!oo0 ~ - o.osooo

C-000 -00 PMEC 1285T1 STEAM 00.000101

C-# 307! [PMEC - [TP5CTRI IS

-1ýj I3-1.0500- 2.0D~ý 0.050-d

-30S. [PM 3[TP.3 22 0]

-I :' 0

- L , :iI I

o

000C

0N

00

i

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND 03PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#O LINERELAY FAIL 28CY --

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc--uprates\sis\TP\i1IMW\dyn\RunEPU_C_07.0out

0'3 T

I. 2051.030! 1V-00000OWOlI

2014 SRUMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgldd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunrEPUC_07.outI 000010 00120_ [.R 3..01.CR G3 2-000)01]115.000 '•; - .. 0 5.O0000

0500 01 005! 10O 2001STLUCIE2 22.000.l01s.ooo 5.oo

11.2000 0.0000

012..00 202107, W-VL-21,01 - - 0--00

C001# 70! [V-T00X0 y P10. .2000 0.70000

II

I

'I --.OK

? _0

U)

200.# 284, [-OWR 12B 5(TPSSTEAM 18.000)I]1.000 - 5.0000

-5000 C"NL# 2-3 [1-W 1ý83 (TP5TB: 18.05)-7

C-#~~~ ~ ~ 2000- 4T 2.001

-5.000

.000 O # ooo 1-000R 01 22. .000101 50015.000 - ý -

I

0 0

I I I I I I

I I I - I I I

00

-0''

Page 23 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3 PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINE,RELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Ruon EPUC_07.out4E,

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Ru_EPU _C_07.out

61.000 59.000

6-.0-.0

k1.000

CHNL• 294: IE•M 41TP.4 2200011]

9.5000

i9 .- 0 2930 [-'0M 3[TP.3 22.000111 -0.0000

SI I I •

L.

I I I I I I I I

ow

04

o04- U

4-

(5

0.1I I I i I I I

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

I 3PM FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINE,RELAY FAIL 28CY1 LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU C 07.out Eu

.0

IEN


I 3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CY[ LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOddo\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_07.out7 0•0 004: [SPD 33011CR RV G3 22.000117

19,5.0000 - - 0.90

C0 # 2-0: 000 3 (TP.3 22.0001119.So00

I I I I I I

(0o.o4ooo -. . . . -0.0200 D

ClN•273, (SPD 2001- -2C• -20-0113

0o.o0oo I .0.0. . .0 -0.0200

! Mo.0 000CHNL# 272: [SPD 1265[TS-TAM 18.0001]. - - -*,

10.000 0000 CM# 2710 0 SPD 1283[ TPseB1 09 I) 000101 - - 0•}.020010.0800 0 0008 [sn 4000 2 . ....0 -0.0200

Moo 000L# 270: (SPD 42[TP.4 22.00010] -0.02 oo

C- # 2- ISD 3ITP.3 .00011-

04.o00-2

00~0 z50

Page 24 of 40




FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\OSMW\dyn\Run EPUC_08-out

150- - -. - -7 00oo.o

005.0 -79, 0000L 2 0. [STLU E2 220 000111k50- 00 . ..... -000.0

C-40. 270: [ANGL 1285 5T- 00TEAM 18.0001]i050. 00 -- -00.0

C000 277 12030[TP5CTB5 18.0001 - -030.00 -000.0

C-00 270: 00000 4 0TP.4 22.00010 1o

CHNL0 275: [ANGL 3 0TP. 3 22.000111 .050.o 00------ -- -000.0o

I I I , I I I* ~ II

6,1

!I 10

ji

f

- •It

*I L

2 i

F40



FILE: C:\home\px0dd.9.. uo-upra es\sis\TP\lMW\dynO\RuEPU_C_08.out00'•.L00 3O fP00C 73000000RV007 700o001 -l

1,0500 -. . . .- 0.0000

c0 0# 3o90 0 p- Ec 200D ST0UC0 E2 2 W0 000I0[0.0500 0 .... . 0.05000

1-oo CHNL# 308: [PMtC 1285[TPSST-M - -4OO _l- .

10.0500 00o.00 000000050oo.000

kCHNL 30 [PMEC 12 3[TP CTB 18 - - - - --2. 0000

300 -n 700: [0000 4[TP.4 22.0001 -0500

1.o050 0 11.05000

I 'fi7 'I I I I I I I1- 5. I'.I1T . f

II.

II S

.1 0

..........l...... ii {I I I I I I I

00p0

I0001

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2069 FRCC LF,. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR

DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY0 914SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\ho\ekpxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Ru EPUC_08.out

000000# 000: (0V-00,AOGMI)1.2000 -3. 0.0000 I

0-000 o0-0000 7_oI Cm•'- 4 71: (V-TR• P)

.20000.700

I;.

-I-

00t

20

05

EIn

010

15.000 .5.0000

15,0,001 005: 0 00 0ooIs0 ucI0 2 22.000111

I 5.0 0 0 0000020. . 5.0

1 05.00.. 284: (POWR 451-5T4 1.000)1) - - 0.001s.ooo 28s;PW 13 T5 1 iooy ooo

• #282; 1 POWR 4 J3TPS. 4B 22.000111

000000200 000000.300.0 0.00)0101I5.000

056, C-4 : 28; POWR 3 ITP. 3 22.ooo]o-5.00000I i I I* '!i .1 I

it

00


3PH FAULT QDAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddS\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 08.out

oU

.00

00

0000

Page 25 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TF3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

R 3PH FAULT &DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILSh LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU_C08.out

-1 4 2- 05 4TP.4 22-o00o01 -

C-#I 2-0 [0 323 T 0.P 22000111

0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU S TP2 SYNCH COND3 PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOAIDFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPUC_08.0ut

I 0109009 06: 60- (60- (FR00 -O Y IE

62.000 - - .000CN~qL# B4:60- (60- FRO-C - 0-OT ))

60.000 00

00

W0,.000Y000020001

00.000 0CHNL# 83 60-(600 0FRQ--NCH0)

i - 0 CHNL# 81, 60- D'I*FRO- FA -;'11) 5 . oI6o.000 , 00 0.0.(O 00-I0291I ~ 0.000I

I I I

0ol.

Ia


DYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3FPH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW.DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE:-C:\home\pxgadd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPFU_C_08.out 10

0E-o

-u


3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILSLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\RunEPU C 08.out

C-00# 3000 [EFD 4[TP.4 22.0001 11

9.5000 - 00

I oC- 299: 0EF 1T. 22.0001.1]I .5000 -0 00I

SI ] I I I 0

_1 "..: IS.D 00[SFCR RV 22 00011].oo0ooo -.. .. . 0 -0.0200

273: 1-D 12[TPSSEA 122.000)11

o.ooo -0 o.o-oo

-8-oo -o o-oI 0.000 - - -~ 2S00004 0.012 - - - 0..0200.

. 0-600 2-00 1D. 41-T.4 22.000)11 -0.0200

-0.04000 * -1 -0.0200

SD TP 2.009

~0

Do0.010

0

04

0

E-

N

50

Page 26 of 40


2o114 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC IF.S (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C: \hoooe\pxg~dd \ nuc-uprates\001H\TP\I1M04\dyn\Run EPH C 09 Coot

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCNGD. TP304 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COED - -

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINE,MID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014 u

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-upraoes\s\TP\l1MH\dyn\RuEPUC_59.ouo

C-0 .00 1 .. . .G 22 000.0 1

050. 00 7 -1 00- 0 i,C0-1# 279 [A-G0 2001ST0LU00 2 2 0 000101

000.00

- - -, -00.0

00010278 10 N 0 10 850 0 1-55-M 0000 0001:

050.00

-0-:00.0

C-L 2770 10A 12830[TPSCTBI -[.000101]

CHNL# 276:, (AN-0 01-.0 22.000101

100.00 271 -000 3 ITPI3 -111071

I 4 .I

I I

II

* iI

i

- I

*

I ,1 •

/0

CD(N

00 H00

Ru

0

10.00o -.. .. - 0.05000

0.0100 0000 00.....00100000

0.000 0.05000 0 I

c0.0 300 000 EC 200 IST1S0T0A 22.0001,11

0

01 05000

1.0500

30 8, rPMEC 1263T5CTB

-M 18000411]00.

1.o~oo 05000#000, 10000 1000 1000 0.00000]

0 C0NL0 3060 1PMEC 40[TP. 22.00041 - 0.0I0

CH.-#0S [ 1-~ 3 [TP 3

2 -000l ý1

1.05000 0.05000

II,

,1I•

-I.

.I

'I

SiI' I " I II

I I

(.2

N

~o4-z000004

0 z

10

i


3PH FAULT @DAVIS 130KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAIlLOAfFLOW=DY09 14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddO\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_09.out

00

.. 0 0- 1. oOo~ob~l

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2000 FRCC LODE (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND C

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINE,MID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW-DY0 9 14RE4.SAV, SNAPSHOT = FY09R4-2014 •U

FILE: C:\homep\01dd9\nuc-upraletes\si\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUC_09.out H00010 000: 100W 0 3 001 0R RVG

2000000001I

I _

1.2000 0 -000

0- 0. : 00F500 370.0000- P 0.70000

.2/ 20'-k

0401

NU)

15,000CHNL * 285: [POWR 20 0[STMUCJ.E2 2 2 .000 111 x 5 00

15.000

X + s5oooo

-00000 2840 10000 12850TP5ST0 M 18.000110

1 000 00C00# 2830 0 POWR 120 31-500 001 T -.0001 - - - - .00

0 CH0 .# 2020: 0I00R 4100.4 20.0001 500.0000•N#28

1;: [pOWR 3[TP.3

22,001ý1

I-.ooo 00ooo

4.

I.-

(.

i

ZE-o

N

N

000~Oo

S08 00

Page 27 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LID. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY08014SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\l1MW\dyn\RunEPUC00 out

2014 SUMMER PEAR LD, 2001 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINE,MID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Rurn EPGC_09.out

00~20

m00000(o3

00(o~I -.2000.0 00, 00s- [2o. IP0S-02UT00]

-0000 -94: [0000 4(T-.4 2,.000,0] -o 0olq ROON

l C• 293, [E-M 31-TP3 - -00]V]0.5000 200023 00 30. 2000 S0OO00

I I I I I I =00

(62.00 - (60 60.000

C-003 B3, 0- (6D0 IFR-AOCHO

-HL -- 4 60.000 I)

00

U 2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD, (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT ODAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUC_09.out

- -. 000, [0 41-T.4 22.000 0I]

1 9.5000 - - - -05000

I CH- 299: 0 EFD [0 , T0.3 02.0002 ] -

I I I I l I I I

00~

>

'0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD. (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINE,MID BRK 31 FAILOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C: \home\pxgOdd9\nuc -uprates\sis\TP\liMW\dyn\Run EPUC_09. out

10.080000 0 . . . . -0.00001

.00-0200C- 273: 23 D 200STLUCIE2 22-..0111

o.os0oo I .. . .. , -o~oo

i 0.0 0 20 20: [SPD 25TST .- --. 0003 ý- - - -0.-0

i0-0C-N# 271- SPD 12 TP5TB . --8 000-] -I0.0000200 3.02 000IOCl -0.02000- ,•vu 1-0 [SD 4TP.4 122.01101ýI0.0000 20 003 3, 00 40. 200J ~ - - -0.0200I

0-0600000 269: [SPD 3 [TP.3 22.0001]1 -0.020-0]

II I I I I

29(0302DI

0

0000

Page 28 of 40


[ 2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

2PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPUC 10.out

ý1~o __. ..6 -loo.oCHNL• 7• [A-q '2001-LUC-E2 22.000111150.00 - - - -.- 0.0o

05.00 CHI0 278' 0 L 128.5[ 1T-5E 001=1 _Io

150.00 --o-,

101000# 277, , ANGL 12035 TP0B1 10 - -.00011]

CHNL# 276, 0ANGL 40TP.4 22.0001- 1050.00o -000.0o

15-D 275, [AN0 L 0 [0 T 3 2H0 -000.0

.I ,Ii _ J

* ii* I -

* 4

)i/0

'I

'-4

z61 H

mRU~0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND 5

3PH FAULT SFLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\ho\ekpxgoddB\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_10.ou0100500 1CHNL# 3100 [PmEC 3301[CR RV G3 22.000)11 -- - ] ,0.0500 C01100# 3090 [PMEC 2000 ST LUC. E2 22,000011 0. 05000

1.0500 11010'. 304, 10001 124I[ I 00.000]0 . - .. 0.05000 •

10-0530 100,002 000: [100 18,00501V .0.0.0.1 . 0_0

C0-01. 306: 1PMEC 4 1TP.4 22.000101

S.050050

1010

0

i

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND

3CPH FAULT OFLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS. .LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C: \home\pxgOdd9\nuc--uprates\siS\TP\1iMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_10. out

E-5

0>

z1-004 33' lH.00000101.

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2000 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND0

3PH FAULT OFLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DYS9B_4SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYO9R4-2014 u1310- C:\h0101\no•0S g\nlls-:1I1t00\0111\¶P\11MW\dvo\HIn 0011 C 10 0111 0-4

1.2000 0.70000

1.2000

1.2000 IHN0 71: P) 0-.000

"I I1 I I I I I

i, I

'~110i

44(1)

CS

105.000 11. 0 100 01 0 0 0 01 11 .... - 1 5.0000 o

C-oL• 285, (POWR 200[Sf-- - 2.000111

S15.000 .oooo

105.000 1001050 304: [10100 1405[TP500TEA0 04.000101 - 1

15.000 1 0 0.0

- 00. Cý# 28:IPOWF 12831ITP5CTBI - -8,000-!5000

CHNL 282: [POWR 4[TP.4 20.000110

[15.000100. 00: 100 01.0 20011500

is oI I " 211 I- I[1_ 2I111

0.

I • 1 I I ~ ~~~~I'' . . .1 • - - - - - -

EH

.04

00 zo

02

Page 29 of 40


2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFD (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPUCl0.ou.0

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LIDE (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND


FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPUC 1i.0o•

z.~

w0000

cm•L• 86 : 60• (60* rFRO-pOTNAM( I

. CHNL# 294, LOTUM 4[TP.4 22.0001]1 _05.0

k5CHNL0 2930 [0TRM 1T.0 22.000.1019.5000 • -05S000

I I I I .1 I I I I I

0

]6i.ooo 5.. . .- c~o(00.000 - .....- + 59.000

I 00000.0 000C-4 83: 6 [0( 0 CFR0-5NCHI

C1#.000 000 II 00.000000. 00, 00. (000* [POO-FLOX50 ]00,000 - - 0.000

I I I I I I I I

-3d

N 00

2014 SUMMER PEAK LD, 2009 FRCC LFDB (8/24/09) MODIFIED FORDYNAMICS. FIRM INTERCHNG. TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND0 .3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\l1MW\dyn\RunnEPUC .0.ut

i

CN 300: 1-F 4 [TPA4 22.00011]12-005000

900 000•0. 299, [EFD 30[TP.03000 4 000. -0.50002I .5000000800 00 00.

I I I I I I

•E,

0

E.r00

-u


3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYS9R4-2014

FILE: C:\home \pxýgýdd9\nuc--uprates\sis\TP\1IMW\dyn\RunEPU_C_10.0out

030000 1 G3 2. .- - 0- .0200

C-00# 273. 1SPD 200lST0UCE2 -2.000111

0.00000# 272; [SPD 1285[T5TAM [-S- - .00000 0

S0. o 1- 2 00.1-0.0200

10000 000. 7000 [S 4100.4 22.0.0000

10.080000000020, 000 00. .000 00 0I

1 1 1 129 1 1S1 [T.3 2200)I

o.o ooo ------ -o.o-o

I 5I5 270 1- 1 ITP 4 §0ý -

io .. 55 I- 1- 3T 2-- -

000

00[43

U)

0

Page 30 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDO REV.2(B/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS .

LiLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S5.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C: \home\pxq0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\lIMW\dyn\Rou EPU C 16.out

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TUIKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

l LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\IlMW\dyn\RunEPHC_16.out

-- 0 '303 . . I3 .... ... .... .. I

330c000Th0 23. 1 . 0 1 G.0rT 0 22 .00)1-

100.00 C00. 7. [01 003070 0003 .....- , -I000. 100.0 01 278. [AN0 L -01 5[-5 M 100 0 8.0001-0.0

000.00 -oo, 001, 473.00.011 o 0~5000C-# 20 [- 1283 (T - .1 . ..000100

050.00 - -000.0 ;- 4NL 2?5, 1-NL 34TP. 3 22,000111

I0

* (0

0 -,

-- C ,

005o~310~

03 4,4

NO

10z.o00oo -. .. - o.o~oooo

1.00500 0005000

i. osoo 0. 00000

k10-00 000 308 [PMEC 1301105[ S-0 18.300D111 0-.0000

SCHN14 306, IPMEC 41TP.4 22.00011111. 0500 0d4.0.0

1-.0 C- 300 , IP0 EC 1 031.3 22.000111 0.000I', v I I1 ' I

- .

I I

I,

,i I ,

'* I

", I -0

S i' I I I, i I I I

FC4

00a4

.0

00

2014 SUMMER 001 LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND 4U)3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEBRK 90 FAILS ..

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY08R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\IlMW\dyn\Run EPU C_ 16.out

~000

CM # 00 : V-A00y 0 ]0.2000 . . 0.70000 o o o

C-•# 67! (V-FLAGM:1

.200000000C-hT# 71! [V-•RKEY P]

1.3000.000ooo

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COME)3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS -

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYO9R4-2014 m UFILE: C3\home\pxgOdd9knu\o c-uprates\sis\TP\SlMW\dynk\Ru EPU_C 16.0ut

.ooo 0 0 01 RV 03 2 o.00010.100.000285: 0 POW 200 [STLUCIE2 22.00011015.000 0o o 0 _

100.000 0001-0 100 -00 0001 [T- 0I.000)101

150.000 003..20.100 11. 0 001

-'.0 -0000

- 0h• 28 2: [POWR ý [T- •2.20- 111• t%

15.000

15.ooo 0033-0 281, 0001 3100 .0 1 5.0000[ I 3 I

0 0

Page 31 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(0/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TURKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llKW\dyn\Run EPUC_16.out

- X

oH

CHNL• ~ -294 1E14TP4 2 00

I 0.0000 .... . . ,. .. .,. . . . . , -,- .00

I CIONIO ZOO, 10E M 0(03 22.0001 19.50000 -0.0000

I I I I I I I I

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09) , MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND >8PH FAULT ETOIRREY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINEBRK 90 FAILS ..

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR44-505.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014 0

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_6. out

1.0009000

CUNL# 83, : 0 (60- (FRO-CHA OT1)

61-.000 000.10 10-00040 -9~.oooCH- 81 I6o+(o [R -FLAG ) )

61.oo • g~oo

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFD0 REV.2(0/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT MT KEY POINT ON LEVEE 230KV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW-DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FYSOR4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\l1MW\dyn\Run_EPUC_16.out ~10

~-0u0

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(R/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @TUORKEY POINT ON LEVEE 230EIV LINE,BRK 90 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_16.out

o .00000 -. . . . 0 -0.02000

COOS 020, 00 0 1200[STLUCIE2 22.000111

C L#272: [SPD 1285[TPSSTEA 18,00011]0.08000-0.02000

10.08000~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -oi -00 -0 00OOIOSO0 0000 - - -, 0-00I o~~ooo50000 20 00 000 00000,-0.02000

20 270: 1SPD 4[TP.4 22.00041 -. 00 0

io ooo50 269: [[PD 3[T2 P.3 22.000111 -0.0200

I I I I I I I

'SQ

0450304

z0

- Page 32 of 40


2014 SIUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDS REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @0LEVEE230V ON TURKEY POITT#l LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\ho-e\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyo \Run EPU C 17.outC-•# 2-00 3300[CR RV G3 22.000111 --

CIHn 279 0 200 ooIlOOO 22-0001100.00. -1oo.o0

-0 2780 0AG 25[TP STM -000

C-b# 277, 0100 1283[TPSCTBI Is.0001 -]050.00 -000.0

COCH-O 276: 1ANGL 41TP.4 21.00011]

1CHNL 275 , [AN 30TP 3 2200 111 - 0

000.00 001 7,101 20. -100.01I I •I I' I I I I I

(4* 00

* 0

* ( ¢

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CY•LOADFLOW=DY09-14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EoPUC_17.out00001 20,10:0 00M0 3010CR 00 C 22.000001

I 050000 -. 0.00000

11.03090 C001 000, [S0000E 2000 0 2.000.0000I.osoooooo

.. 5.. C-# : - r C 1285[T-TEAM is 0o0i000

k .00 CH000 000, 0000020005000001 0.000100 -- --•. 0510.O000100

C-NL 307: [PMEC [1.8{PCB 4 800I.000 0 1 0 00.05000

11000. 0000.3 000, 000E0 4000.4 22-.000.0000

C-#NL 3D5, [PMEC 3 [TP. 3 22-00111.000.0000

.I I . I I I

i. i

I 0i

0' I

-- .I

I

_ . (

0' I " 0

0

P4O

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCOONG FRCC LFDS REV.2(8/24/091, MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH CONE3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#S LINERELAY FAIL 28CY

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\lSMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_17.out

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09) , MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-0S.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYO9R4-2014

FILE, C:\home\kRxSdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C 17.out

20- E2 2.0001015oo 00010 200, 00000 200[00UC0E2 42.00]]..... 0.50000

1500 oooo 000 204, [0000 02005[T0S00T0M 10.0001]0 ... - 0.0000

lsoooo

110.000 005202, [00000 410.4 22.00101 - .00

H

z0

u

z

00

Page 33 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/2 /09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU N LN 2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINE,RELAY FAIL 28 CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxg~dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_17.ou0

0Yo~00E~o

lol

I?

2014 SUM1MER 50 LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDO REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT OLEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINERELAY FAIL 28CYLOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYO9R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\SIMW\dyn\Run EPU C 17.out

20u

0z

(99

w(9

P42

9.5oo0 -0.5000

CNL# 293,: I0M 31-3 21 ... 0001W19.5000 -000

I I I I - I

I

86, s 00. (6001-0 P-0 1)5 00

610.000 5.0CN#84: 60.!60"fFR-Q - TEJ)59ýo

0.o . . ... -. 59.000

C-W# 63, -0(60"IPR0-ANCH]) -.

i10.000 51.000

I I I I I

'I<,

00

10

12014 SUMMER 00% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT OLEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#I LINERELAY FAIL 28CY

) LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S0.SAV, SNAPSHOT- FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C_17.out

-0000 ' (000 -(00 2[TP.4 22.000111

I 9.5000 -5000

-. 0:

-o

E-

02

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @LEVEE230KV ON TURKEY POINT#1 LINE,RELAY FAIL 28CY•LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\d•n\Run EPUC_17.outPD 3301[CR R G3 22.000)i)

06.000)10)

Io .0.00 0 - - -* -0.0o00

CHý# 271, [5PD 1253 (TP5CTB2 -000101

i.0B000 -0-0200

002690 (SPD 34-3.3 22.000110

o.ooo -0.02

220

~c4320)23

02U)

z

Page 34 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

1 3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS( LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYO9R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dvn\Run EPU C 18.outC0000 100 - 3301[CR RV G3 22.00011] --

15o.oo 0 - = -= 00.

0 .4 2790 IA0L 2000 STLUC1E2 22,000111 05. . . -000.0 . .

-50.00

I .... , .... [A-= 1283[TPBCTB, . oo1

1 5o . oo C- . . . .4 [T0o. I 2 - )

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDE REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU I TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

•LOADFLOW=DY09-14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE 1 C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C_18.out1 CH0 # 310. [PMEC 3301CR R G3 22.000)]---

11. 0 3090 rpmEC 2000 00 [10S TLUC 2 02 00 01]

1-.50000 0. 1000005050000 0 .001 - - =-+ 0 .05000.0 C0 308 [PMEC 22851TP5STEAM 10.000)i0

1-1000# 307: 0 PMEC 1- 4)TPSCTBI -8.00011;

1-1.0500 0000 .5....0 7.0 000011O.OS0000-I# 306,IPMEC 41T-4 -- j47

- 0 5 31 3 22-0011

00 0

I

*• I _i' I -* ' I

0.a4

10

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDE REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

( LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg

5 dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunEPU_C_18.out

~U)

-- ~o 33 : [-A - 1TON

200

000

-4 0.700000

u)

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INT'ERCHNG FRCC LFDE REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg0dd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_18ou0

S15.00000210 0 wR .. 0 01JCR RV G3 22 000110

Ioo.ooo 0000 0.100 00S000 0000 . . 5.0000

0000 00000 005: 10000 100IO{STLCRl 00.000101

S. . . 5.0000

I15. 000 t f1''•23 POWR 12831TP5CTBI 18.111V .. ... _

H

ro

0010.000

00

00

Page 35 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09) MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU S TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY9 _14SR4-0S.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\1M1W\dyn\Run EPU C_18.out

o,

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINEBRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S0.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgoddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\RunSEPU C 18.out

C•# 294: [E•M 4 [TP.4 22.00Q] i]

9.I5I'l-0.5000

19.5000 -. so000

0

o {

CHNL# 86: 60+ (60. (PRO-PUTN 59.0o610.000 0010 0 0-0.00-0002oo~ --

61-ooo . .. . .. . s.oo.

kl~oooC-•# B3, 60-(60*-F0-AN-H1) .61.000 59.000

610.000 0001..0000

I I- I I { {

20

2014 SUMMER 00% LOAD LEVELFIOM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2P (8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILSI LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\liMW\dyn\Run EPUC_18.out ~EIo>

-o

-I

2014 SUMMER S0% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCMNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS ON LEVEE #1 230KV LINE,BRK 96 FAILS

LOADFLOW=DY09 14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILEI: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC 18.-1.t

C-N# 2?4, [spD 33o1[CR RV G3 22.oo]1o0.000100 0 ....- - -. 0200

CHNL0 2-0, 0SPD 200[STLUCIE2 22.000)11i

o2-oo - .... 11 T -o-o oo

10.000 0000010 0.2i [000SPD 12B3 ITPSCTBI 18.0001Y1 - - - 0

.00 2 -000)110.0200

10.0000 000. 2700 [000 0(000.0• 22.000101 - 0020

0-0

12102

CO

0

0Do112

Page 36 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

L LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~dds\noc-uprates\sis\TP\11MW\dyn\Run EPU C 19-out

1- 1- 1-0-10 2•oI 00 -i011

1000 2001-TL-0E2 0

CNNL# 27B : :- 0 1285.TP T M o BO 00hs.-olo

1z

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgldd9\nuc-upraoes\0i4\TP\llMW\dyn\Run-EEUC1.0utIC 000031o00 I 0000 01011CR 0000 0300001:11

1.oso • . . . • o.osooo

0.0500 - 1- 0.05000 1

C 3Q8: [PMEC 12B STBTAM 1.0001, 1

1. OSO0 n -OO0- -.000A 307: 0 PMEC 12831T-5-81 18. sOa -.0001 - - - 0.05000

1.0500 -o.O.000

C-400 305, [PMEC 3Tpb00 22.0o0001

[1.05o .010. s' 0000oo2 ~ . 0.050001

[•.oo 010Ooools 10000. ooo 0.0500o

10 ' • I I I' I I I 0

I.I I

8 . I

8 I '

I I

I. I

8: I10 1

,. -

I, .

I I 1"I I 0

100

10z10~

S

~ro~-ScoO

N

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCNG FRCC LFD REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU T 2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdds\nusc-uprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run EPUC_1 -out

10>

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCING FRCC LFD REV-.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH'COND3PE FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID ERK 31 FAI

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C: \home\pxgoddD\nuc-uprases\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU DC 19 ous

CW 2eIpOR - -- 03000CR RV G3 22.-14000

Ioo.ooo 00101 0, 100 00[0.00 000 .... 5oooli00 5. 0000

CH #284! IPOWR 1285 [TP5STEAM - -0011)

•s~ooo5,oo

H

10

0

Page 37 of 40


2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCENG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 13..V1 ON VILLAGE GREEN LINE,MID BRK 31 FAI

I LOAIDFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-Gprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C_19.out

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND,3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

LOA•FLOW=DY0Y914SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPU_C_19.0ut

00z

¢•WT,£ R•- 60- [60. I•R•-ptlTNAMI I

COOOOL. 2005 fF 4[TP 0 2240001119.5- - - - -

k5a- CHNLP 2- [E2M 3 ITP, 3 2ý -1V

o - -+ 59ooon

i- 0 C-#L 84: 60-(60-jFRQ-CHARLTE1) - ------

i10.000 0-0 .. ..- - 9. Ii6.000 a05# 00 00-(40* FR5 ANC0 .

I I II I I

0

010

00.19

2014 SUMMER 90% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-osprates\sis\TP\1lMW\dyn\Run EPUC_119.out

,00

Ix

EU

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL,FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @DAVIS 138KV ON VILLAGE GREEN LINEMID BRK 31 FAI

I LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgOdd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyon\Run EPU C 19.0out

....00. 500005 204. 0 0000005 0500 .2.2.0 . . . .-0.0200

10.000000087.0 0000 O..... 02 020010 -0.0200.

1 0ChOTL- 2720 [SPD 1253FTP5CTB 18.000]01 -

10.000 2 ..... 0 -. 0200 I00000 2-00 000D 40T . 22.000], -

N

CO

0 z10.1 0

Page 38 of 40


2014 SUMM4ER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHOG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBAMK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.kLO3ADFLOW=DY09S14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY0SR4-2014

FILE: C: \home\pxgodds\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\11IMW\dyn\Run EPUC_20 out

000.00 -- IT T. - 4 00.I "0 .000001 270: 0A001 200 10T1UCIE2 22.000101 -0.

150.00 00 1001 oOIO 070 0 .00 1 -.. . - K -000.0

050.00C- 207: [A00- 050 T050700 01B000 -000

500000 20: 101 40 4 0.01. - - -1000.C-4 270: 1f-0 01T0. 22.000101

-4000.00 -00. I

I I -•I i

* 14

. *, . \

-m

Iz0

200

00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCONG FRCC LFDB REV.2(B/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

LOA•FLOW=DY0SB14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxogOddS\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPUC_20.outCNL# 310: IPMEC 3301 [CR VG3 22.00011)

.1.0500 -0: 0 0002 2200110.050

C-# 300: 100 200308 [1- 000010001 000: [0000PMEC 12B3.[TP15TE1 1.0001 - - - 0-05000

1.0500

C00 30: [ONPMEC 1004 22.000111 51.0500

1.050001 005: [100 00.0 20.00011S ; I I I' 1 I I I

I. I

0' I

i'-

, ' II i I

, , I

,p 0

I. 0

0, . j

1. I I Ii I I

SWH

1920(93

0

000~00

0

U


1000020 PM FAULT @OFLASARI COOFOARE. BUS EBB 67 FAILS.IR0~LOADFLOW-DYSS _145R4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FYSBB4-2514

FILE: C: \home\pxgOdd9\nuc -uprates\sis\TP\0I1MW\dyn\Run EPUC_20 oout

1.2000 00 67: lV-1 10201104 01: 10-FLAS0AM!1

f I0, /

; )

-O10 1

El

008

0

U)

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVEL, FIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PM FAULT @FLAGAMS CSPBAMK. BUS EBB 67 FAILS.

LOADFLSH=DYSB_545B4-SS.SAV, SNAPSMOT= FYSBB4-2514FILE: C: \home\pxg5 dd9\nuc-uprateo\sis\TP\IiMW\dyn\Bun EPUCS20.out

10 . 0 00201 00.0: 10 WR3010 00 C1 0 010 G0 22.000 )11 - -)

105.000 000 00 00 0 0100 02 ..000101 00010.000 5.0000]

I C-0001 2840: 1-W 12812[TPSSTOA 100.000111

in 0000 282: [000R 41T0.0 22.000111 ]0.

tOH

to-to

.00

o

B

Page 39 of 40



3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S0.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014

FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run_EPUC_20.out

19.50000 -:~ 100 4 (T- 4 22008 _0 S.00

115. 090, [-M9 22,000111.-.-- -0.000

I I I I T

,00

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFISM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/05), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS BRK 67 FAILS.

L LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-S5.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxgodd9\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyn\Run EPU C_20.0ut

100.000 ~ ~0105 86, 60- (0- FR0O-PU00s4 - - 0.0

610.000 00 0~:0 0-0001: - 50.0

10.00 00005 CH 08: 60,0-HO'010-90.00000 75.00

81 60-I0-[ FLAI 11

0r4

z

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNO FRCC LFDB REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU + TP2 SYNCH COND3PH FAULT @FLAGAMI CAPBANK. BUS IRK 67 FAILS_

LOADFLOW=DY09_14SR4-50.SAV, SNAPSHOT= FY09R4-2014FILE: C:\home\pxg~ddg\nuc-uprates\sis\TP\llMW\dyon\RunEPU_C20.0out

C0NL0 30 0 : IEFD 4 [TP..4 22.0001 1)9.500 _5 _ 0 _0 00.0

1 . .CHNL4 299; [EFD 3[TP.3 22.00011] 0ý50

E-o

'oC

0

2014 SUMMER 50% LOAD LEVELFIRM INTERCHNG FRCC LFDS REV.2(8/24/09), MODIFIED FOR DYNAMICS TP3&4 EPU , TP2 SYNCH COND

M. I ON FAULT eFLAGdAMI CAPSAe. BUS RsK 67 FAILS.IHOOOLOADFLOI48DYSS_14SR4-SS.SAV, SNAPSHOT. FYSOR4-25014

FILE: C:\home\pxOgdd9\nuc-ooprateS\Sis\TP\11MW\dyoo\Run SOD C 20.0000

Noo. c . -ý - -- 0 -0000

- 0 0005 2730: [SPD 200 0STLUCIE2 22.000)1 1

10.08000 0005 00- -00 -090000 800 - - - - -O.O0O00 0 .. .. .00000000SCHN# 272; (SPD 128S51-5T- M 18.000]11

0.0 o 000 -0.0200

i.0 .... 0 # 2710 (W0D 12 .TP0CTB2 10.000Y -- - -" -0.0

i - -C-N# 270: (-PD I[T. :22. 0001)ýL_ 2

i 0.0s000 5000 000: oro 000.0 0 0) o 3

-0.000

I I I II I I I

~08

Page 40 of 40

Documents

IPL. MAR3 1 2011 - NRC