Upload
dwayne-owen
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
European Laser Timing work progress
Ivan Procházka, Josef Blažej (1), Jan Kodet (1,2)K.Ulrich Schreiber (2)
presented at ACES IWG meeting, Neuchatel, Switzerland, June 2014
(1) Czech Technical University in Prague, 119 19 Prague 1, Czech Republic(2) Technical University in Munich, Munich, Germany
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT detector work progress, June 2014
Flying unit is manufactured delay caused by ESA soldering qualification processsolution found
No additional technical problems expected
FM will be compared (detection delay) to theELT Calibration Device before leaving the clean roomexperimental HW under test at CTU
Progress impaired by a re-structuring of a contractor CSRC ltd. company split into two parts - CSRC ltd. Clean rooms, assembly, contract.. - KBmicro ltd. Staff, Electronics, documentation,..
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Detector package - mobile test benchCTU in Prague, June 2014
Honeycomb optical bench
Fibre laser + OPO + SHG laser531 nm, 100 ps, 10 MHz
Focussing optics
Beam splitter
Start detector
ELT detector EM
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Detector package - mobile test benchCTU in Prague, June 2014
Laser power and synch.
Timing system NPET
Optical bench
ELT detector under test
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Detector package - mobile test benchCTU in Prague, June 2014
1 hour
+/- 2 ps p-p
warm up& tuning
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ACES ELT Ground Station CalibrationRequest for Proposal, ESA, March , 2014
The ground station will be characterized by a single calibration value / station
Calibration value computed from - epoch dif. (E2-E1)- geometry distance L
Calibration Device consisting of :- ELT type detector package- Epoch Timing system ET
Epoch E1 recorded using standard SLR system
Epoch E2 recorded using ELT Calibration Device (Detector & Timing device)
Both systems use common time & frequency
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Calibration Device test # 1, WLRS Fundamental Station Wettzell, Germany, February – May , 2014
ELT type detector package in front of SLR telescope distance surveyed repeatedly (< +/- 1mm)
Event timing NPET
Epoch reference “1pps” connected consecutively to SLR and ELT timing systems using identical cable (24 m, LRM240)
20 ps RMSLaser
PD
EG
Detector
ES
L
BS
ET G ET S
1 pps TG
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Calibration Device Performance Test Fundamental Station Wettzell, Germany, February 13-14, 2014
Timing resolution test20 Hz, 10 ps laser FWHM, 8% rate
Jitter ~ 20 ps rms
Dynamical range 0.. 50 % (!!!)within +/- 6 ps half p-p(good for SLR tracking..)
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
20 Hz, 10 ps laser FWHM, 8% rate
TDEV 2.3 ps @ 100 s averaging
100 s series simulating ISS / ACES path in all other measurement
Resulting in ~ 160 raw readings / path = > ~ 140 valid data points
Series to series Stability +/- 1 ps
ELT Calibration Device Performance Test Fundamental Station Wettzell, Germany, February 13-14, 2014
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Calibration Device test # 1, WLRS, March 17 – May 7, 2014 ELT Calibration Long Term Stability
13 ps rms
+/- 24 ps p-p
50 days
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
ELT Calibration Device test # 1, WLRS, March 17 Time Scales Re-Synchronization Effect
re-sync
20 ps
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
The geometrical distance D = 2302 +/-1 mm => one way propagation delay (air) DT = 7673 +/- 3 ps
Statistical spread between groups 1 - 2 ps without re-sync. effects
group to group jumps up to+ / - 20 ps p-p due to “1pps” cabledelay variations / mechanical
Overall mean epochs difference22 952 +/- 13 ps ( worst case est.)
+/- 6 ps omitting outliers
ELT calibration value WLRS ET = 15 279 ps +/- 13 ps
ELT Calibration Device test # 1, WLRS RESULTS SUMMARY
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
CONCLUSION - ELT status June 2014 ELT detector FM being completed (exp. End 2014)
ELT Ground Station Calibration RFP response delivered to ESA start expected mid 2014
The ELT FM delay calibration Test bench assembled and testedFM Calibration Device
expected CSRC Kromeriz, fall 2014
SLR Calibration missions WLRS demo completed May 7,2014 systematic =< 13 ps demonstrated Graz SLR mission planned July 2014
EU 3 x SLR calibrations pre-launch calibrations 2015 mission run calibrations 2016 - ?
Non EU SLR stations which ones ?
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase meter based on New Pico Event Timer
New Pico Event Timer NPET based on SAW filter excitation and frequency domain data processing
Extreme timing resolution, stability and linearity Built in generator of synchronous time markers Two channel NPET may be used for phase comparison Key parameters
Timing resolution < 1.3 ps (450 fs) Timing stability (phase) < +/- 50 fs / K (!!) Recording rate 300 Hz (10 kHz) Frequencies 100/200MHz versus
5/10…..200MHz
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase meter based on New Pico Event TimerLONG TERM STABILITY
+/- 0.1 K
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase meter based on New Pico Event TimerTEMPERATURE DRIFT
200 MHz frequency + passive split, equal cables length
- 40 +/- 50 fs /K
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase Meter based on New Pico Event Timer
200 MHz frequency + passive split, equal cables length
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase meter based on New Pico Event TimerTWO MASERS PHASE DIFFERENCE
EFTF 2011, published in IEEE
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase meter based on New Pico Event TimerTWO MASERS PHASE DIFFERENCE
To be published in RSI
Wettzell, Feb. March 2014
I.Prochazka et al ,ACES IWG meeting Neuchatel June 2014
Phase meter based on New Pico Event Timer
The device is available for ACES