Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IPS 2025 Strategic Plan + Board Goals
June 24, 2021
Good strategy management ensures that our strategy is responsive to changes in our landscape
2
PurposeWhy do we exist?
BeliefsHow do we want to operate?
StrategyWhat will we do to advance our mission and reach more students?
Strategy ManagementHow will we monitor our progress?
ResourcingHow will we organize our people, time and money?
Values
Strategic Priorities
InitiativesCulminating Milestones
Theory of Action
Budget Staffing
Implementation
PlanMeeting
Structures
Vision/Mission
Board Goals
Scorecard
3 Values, Priorities, 20-21 Initiatives
Vision/Mission
● Vision
○ IPS is a family of excellent public schools in which every
student has the opportunity to succeed and the power to
create their own future.
● Mission
○ IPS empowers and educates all students to think critically,
creatively, and responsibly, to embrace diversity, and to
pursue their dreams with purpose.
4 Revised in 2018
2025 Strategic Plan
5
Values Statements
Students First
We know that all students, regardless of circumstance, can achieve at the highest levels. Therefore, we strive for excellence by holding ourselves and our students to high expectations
and ensure that we focus on the holistic needs of our students, setting them up for lives of choice and purpose.
Racial EquityWe pursue our social justice mission by building diverse classrooms and teams, deploying our
resources to ensure historically disadvantaged students get the opportunities they need to succeed, and ensuring our classrooms and work environment respects the dignity of all.
Continuous
Improvement
We endeavor to get better and achieve more through hard work and continuous learning, both as individuals and as a system.
IntegrityWe hold ourselves to the highest possible standards of professionalism and service and
communicate with candor and care.
CommunityWe treat each other with love and respect, work effectively across lines of difference, and
continuously foster the kind of supportive, inclusive community within IPS that we desire for our city.
5 Adopted Core Values
2025 Strategic Priorities
6
Strategic Priorities for the 2025 Strategic Plan
1. Increase Access to Rigorous Curriculum and Instruction
Support adults at all levels of the system to build safe, engaging, and socially and
emotionally supportive learning environments for students that ensure access to high-
quality curriculum and instruction.
2. Promote Racial Equity
Strengthen and expand our work to eliminate opportunity gaps, align policies and talent
decisions to IPS’ antiracism agenda, and build capacity for team members to persistently
interrupt and address institutional bias.
3. Foster Authentic Engagement
Equip and engage families, team members, and the community in authentic and inclusive
partnerships.
4. Operate and Fund Strategically
Strengthen the efficacy and equity of central office supports, services, and resource
allocations.
Strategic Priorities
Why Board Goals?
● Opportunity and urgency around defining aspirations for student
outcomes
● Laser focus on racial equity and eliminating achievement gaps
● Bring clarity and focus to the board and the district’s work
● Affirm support of the 2025 Strategic Plan
● Establish a progress monitoring framework
● Intent is for goals to be overarching and comprehensive of entire IPS
family and community
● Given the significant learning loss and trauma caused by COVID-19; and
its disproportionate impact – we are called to action!
7
8 Adopting Board Goals
Our Process to this Point
● Leading up to, and during the May Work Session, the Board
began discussing specific Board Goals aligned to the Strategic
Plan 2025
● Following May Work Session, board staff compiled themes
and desires from meeting and coordinated with
administration on feasibility and to add additional context.
● Small group meetings:
○ All commissioners reviewed with administration and
board staff goal development
● June Work Session fine tuning goals and expectations
9
Finished Product
Final Goals for Board Approval:
❑ 9 Goals Total❑ Three SP1 Goals - Rigorous Instruction and Curriculum
❑ Four SP2 Goals - Promote Racial Equity❑ One SP3 Goal - Foster Authentic Engagement❑ One SP4 Goal - Operate and Fund Strategically
*Baseline Year for all ILEARN Data and Graduation Rates is the 18-19 SY.
10
Board Goals
11 SP1: Increase Access to Rigorous C+I
Board Goal #1: By 2025, the percentage of Grades 3-8 students who
meet or exceed grade-level standards in ELA will increase from 22%
to 50%, as measured by the ILEARN assessment
Board Goal #2: By 2025, the percentage of Grades 3-8 students who
meet or exceed grade-level standards in Math will increase from 21%
to 50%, as measured by the ILEARN assessment
Board Goal #3: By 2025, the percentage of students graduating
within four years will increase from 82.39% to 87%, as measured by
IDOE graduation requirements.
Board Goals
12 SP2: Promoting Racial Equity
Board Goal #4: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Black students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in ELA will increase from 13.7% to 50%, as measured
by the ILEARN assessment.
Board Goal #5: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Black students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in Math will increase from 12.7% to 50%, as
measured by the ILEARN assessment.
Board Goal #6: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Latinx students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in ELA will increase from 19.9% to 50%, as measured
by the ILEARN assessment.
Board Goal #7: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Latinx students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in Math will increase from 19.5% to 50%, as
measured by the ILEARN assessment.
Board Goals
13 SP3: Fostering Authentic Engagement
Board Goal #8: By 2025, all IPS schools will engage
100% of their families, as measured by school-
based reports.
Board Goals
14 SP4: Operate and Fund Strategically
Board Goal #9: By 2025, the IPS portfolio of
schools will increase enrollment by 20%, as
measured by ADM.
** Baseline enrollment number is 31,171. A 20% increase would
represent adding 6,234 students.
15 Reporting Calendar
16 Reporting Calendar
● All leading indicators and reporting calendar will be refined and adopted in July. Administration will provide updates on goal progress on a rolling basis as data becomes available.
● Data Availability (anticipated):○ ILEARN - Annually in July○ NWEA Assessment - Sept./Jan./June○ Student Attendance Rates - Aug./Oct./Feb./May○ Student Discipline Rates - Aug./Oct./Feb./May○ Student Enrollment - Aug./Oct./Feb./May○ District Student Mobility Rate - August
17 Next Steps
Board Policy 1110
18
● Adopted in September, 2006.
● Currently lays out the priorities around Board assessment of
administration goals
● Aligns assessment of corporation goals with the annual
Superintendent Assessment
● Also includes language on the Board undergoing period of self-
assessment
Board Policy 1110
19
Amendments to BP 1110
● Decouple progress monitoring and reporting timeline from
Superintendent evaluation.
○ Superintendent evaluation already governed by BP 1240
● Decouple process for Board self-evaluation. Board staff will
develop best practices for Board self-evaluation and report
back.
● Greater detail on expectations of what will be provided to the
Board with respect to goal evaluation.
20 Board Action
Road Map:• Adopt Board Goals • Lay BP 1110 on the table, with anticipated vote on amended
policy in July• Anticipate refined Reporting Schedule presented in July• Begin process of actualizing these goals. Intent is to
contextualize these goals with school leaders and begin incorporating them into conversations around school leadership and instruction.
Appendix
Leading Indicators and Context
23 SP1: Increase Access to Rigorous C+I
Board Goal #1: By 2025, the percentage of Grades 3-8 students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in ELA will increase from 22% to 50%, as measured
by the ILEARN assessment
● Measured by ILEARN assessment
● Data available on an annual basis.
● State Average: 47.9% (SY1819)
● District comparisons:
○ Lawrence MSD = 37%
○ Warren MSD = 28.7%
○ Wayne MSD = 33.3%
○ Washington MSD = 45%
○ Pike MSD = 33.5%
Leading Indicators ● NWEA interim assessment
Board Goals
24 SP1: Increase Access to Rigorous C+I
Board Goal #2: By 2025, the percentage of Grades 3-8 students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in Math will increase from 21% to 50%, as measured
by the ILEARN assessment
● Measured by ILEARN assessment
● Data available on an annual basis
● State context 47.8% (SY1819)
● District Comparison
○ Lawrence MSD = 36%
○ Warren MSD = 34.8%
○ Wayne MSD = 33.1%
○ Washington MSD = 42.5%
○ Pike MSD = 30.1%
Leading Indicators ● NWEA interim assessment
Board Goals
25 SP1: Increase Access to Rigorous C+I
Board Goal #3: By 2025, the percentage of students graduating within four years
will increase from 82.39% to 87%, as measured by IDOE graduation requirements.
● Data available on an annual basis
● State Context: 87.29% average (SY1819)
● District comparisons:
Lawrence MSD = 92.70%
Warren MSD = 86.12%Wayne MSD = 89%Washington MSD = 89.92%Pike MSD = 87.84%
Leading Indicators ● On-track graduation benchmarks
Board Goals
26 SP2: Promoting Racial Equity
Board Goal #4: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Black students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in ELA will increase from 13.7% to 50%, as measured
by the ILEARN assessment.
● Measured by ILEARN assessment
● Data available on an annual basis
● State context = 24.7%
● District comparison
○ Lawrence MSD = 27.1%
○ Warren MSD = 21.1%
○ Wayne MSD = 27.9%
○ Washington MSD = 30.3%
○ Pike MSD = 28.3%
Leading Indicators ● NWEA interim assessment
Board Goals
27 SP2: Promoting Racial Equity
Board Goal #5: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Black students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in Math will increase from 12.7% to 50%, as
measured by the ILEARN assessment.
● Measured by ILEARN assessment
● Data available on an annual basis
● State context = 22.5%
● District comparison
○ Lawrence MSD = 24.4%
○ Warren MSD = 25.5%
○ Wayne MSD = 26.4%
○ Washington MSD = 26.1%
○ Pike MSD = 23.7%
Leading Indicators ● NWEA interim assessment
Board Goals
28 SP2: Promoting Racial Equity
Board Goal #6: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Latinx students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in ELA will increase from 19.9% to 50%, as measured
by the ILEARN assessment.
● Measured by ILEARN assessment
● Data available on an annual basis
● State context = 35.5%
● District Comparison
○ Lawrence MSD = 27.2%
○ Warren MSD = 31.6%
○ Wayne MSD = 33%
○ Washington MSD = 31.3%
○ Pike MSD = 30.2%
Leading Indicators ● NWEA interim assessment
Board Goals
29 SP2: Promoting Racial Equity
Board Goal #7: By 2025, the percentage of Grade 3-8 Latinx students who meet or
exceed grade-level standards in Math will increase from 19.9% to 50%, as
measured by the ILEARN assessment.
● Measured by ILEARN assessment
● Data available on an annual basis
● State context = 34.4%
● District Comparison
○ Lawrence MSD = 28.9%
○ Warren MSD = 36.5%
○ Wayne MSD = 32.3%
○ Washington MSD = 28%
○ Pike MSD = 31%
Leading Indicators ● NWEA interim assessment
Board Goals
30 SP3: Fostering Authentic Engagement
Board Goal #8: By 2025, all IPS schools will engage 100% of their
families, as measured by school-based reports.
● SMART
● Directly aligns to strategic plan + research based approach
(stronger engagement = better outcomes for students)
Leading Indicators ● Panorama (or proxy) staff/student/family survey (2x per year)
● Chronic Absenteeism (1x per year)● School based metrics (Parents in Touch Day,
Parent/Teacher Conferences, Family/Community Events, etc)
Board Goals
31 SP4: Operate and Fund Strategically
Board Goal #9: By 2025, the IPS portfolio of schools will increase
enrollment by 20%, as measured by ADM.
Leading Indicators ● Student enrollment (2x per year)● District school student
mobility/attrition rate (1x per year)
A strong strategic plan ensures we focus limited resources on the most important work
Strong strategic plans position organizations to deliberately pursue their goals and ensure limited resources are not wasted.
Why are strategic plans important?
• They clearly define the impact school districts intend to achieve and the efforts they believe are most likely to achieve them.
• They help organizations narrow and sequence.
• They align and channel limited resources (people, time and money) into fulfilling a focused set of activities.
• They enable reflection and continuous improvement.
Process
This strategic plan will guide the district’s focus for the next five years
Over the past few years, IPS’ prior strategy expired and the Board selected a new superintendent to lead the district forward.
The prior plan, adopted by the Board in March of 2015, guided its work from 2015–16 through 2017–18.
2021–252019–202015–18
In 2019, the Board selected Aleesia Johnson to become the new superintendent and the team developed an annual plan focused on 6 strategic priorities:
1. Student-Centered Teaching & Learning
2. High-Performing Team3. Racial Equity Mindset4. School-Centered Central Services5. Engaged Families, Team &
Partners6. Sustainable Finances and
Operations
Attuned supported the district in shaping the annual plan.
Going forward, IPS has developed a multi-year strategic plan that builds upon the work Superintendent Johnson and the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) executed in SY19-20.
COVID has affected both the timeline and focus of our planning work
Impact on Learning
A recent national analysis found that unfinished learning was not as dire as projected; however, national data from Curriculum Associates found that K-5 students learned 67% of a typical year’s worth of math content and 87% in reading,
TraumaStudents and adults may experience fear, anxiety, stress, uncertainty, etc., through the course of new Covid cases, school closures, and changes to their daily routines. (CASEL)
Economic Hardship
More than 120,000 Marion County workers — a rate of 12.3% in June 2020 — filed for unemployment insurance benefits from March to June (IndyStar)
Given these exacerbated challenges, the current strategy plans deeply for SY20-21and set the broad foundations for SYs22-25.
Approach and Deliverables
Build the capacity and systems such that the ELT can lead IPS in implementing and progress monitoring its plan with excellence and rigor
Gather and analyze data to produce an organizational diagnostic, including:
● Performance analysis
● Constituent perspectives (e.g., surveys, interviews, focus groups, Town Halls)
● Instructional quality review (e.g., site visits and artifact reviews)
Facilitate meetings to analyze and respond to organizational diagnostic and define core elements of the strategic plan,including:
● Values
● Strategic priorities
● 2020–21 implementation plan
● Scorecard
● 21-25 initiatives and milestones
Implementation and Progress Monitoring
Strategic Planning
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Organizational Diagnostic
We have benefited from the engagement of multiple constituent groups in drafting the plan
School Board
Community At Large
Community Council
ELT
School Leaders
Functional Leaders
Engagement has included multiple surveys, townhalls, Principal and team meetings, School Board meetings, etc.
Our most recent conversation with the School Board was February 2021
Most recently, met with the Superintendent’s Parent and Community Advisory Council and our IPS 2025 Community Council
Phase 1: The diagnostic integrated evidence from multiple channels
• Analysis of state/interim assessment data and other related outcome metrics
• Select, deeper-dive analyses into areas of interest identified by district leaders
• On-site observation and analysis of 116 total classrooms across six schools representing an array of grade configurations, school models, student demographics and performance levels in January 2020
• Review of school and central office instructional artifacts (curriculum, instructional enabling systems, PD plans, etc.)
• Results of community survey from over 1660 respondents fielded in December 2019 and January 2020 including board members, 91 school leaders, 50 central office leaders, 879 teachers, 254 parents/guardians, six community partners, 374 staff members and six students*
• Notes from six town hall-style meetings convened in November 2019
• Results of strengths, gaps, opportunities and threats identified in activities with district leadership and the strategic planning community council
• Select interviews with district leaders in January and February 2020 (forthcoming)
Performance DataReview key organizational data to identify areas of strength, weakness and opportunity
Instructional Quality ReviewAssess quality and equity of specific instructional practices and structures
Constituent PerspectivesExtensive surveys and interviews with community, staff and others to collect perspectives on what to start, stop, continue
Phase 1: Identified a range of strengths and gaps across six main areas
Student Culture and Wellness
3A.1. District’s equity focus
1C.1. Lower grades SEL supports, environment
1A. Schoolwide structures and systems
1B. Classroom management
1C.2. Upper grades SEL supports, environment
2A. School safety
2B. Behavior management systems
2C. Exclusionary discipline
3A.2. Addressing students’ unique needs
Evidence is more positive than negative
Evidence is largely mixed
Evidence is more negative than positive
Curriculum, Instruction and
Achievement
1D.1. Four schools “beating the odds”
3B. HS completion, postsecondary
1A. Grade level rigor of student tasks
1B. Student engagement in instruction
1C. Curriculum quality, use
1D.2. Overall student achievement
2A, 2B. Racial achievement gaps
3A. Equity in college / career readiness
Family and Community
Partnerships
1A. Sense of pride, history
1B. Communications to families
3A, 3B. Parent / guardian involvement
2A. Enrollment trends
2B. Student retention rates
Adult Culture and Learning
1A. Teacher DEI attitudes
1B. DEI and SEL professional learning
2A. Growth mindset
4A. Staff dedication, resilience
2B. Professional development
3A. Staff perceptions of culture
3B. Staff-leadership relationships
3C. Consistency and change management
Talent Systems
1A. Staff diversity
2A. Staff retention
3A. Support and compensation
Finance and Operations
1A. Fiscal stability
2A. Alignment, internal communications
We set out to build a 2025 strategy that would leverage these strengths and address our greatest gaps.
ELEMENT DEFINITION
ValuesThe deeply ingrained principles that guide our organization’s actions and serve as its cultural cornerstones
Strategic Priorities
The multi-year focus areas that respond to current strengths and opportunities and that, if implemented with excellence, will drive desired results
InitiativesThe system-wide, multi-year work streams aligned to a strategic priority, typically including both new endeavors and efforts to dramatically improve the quality, rigor and/or consistency of existing practices
Implementation and Progress Monitoring
Strategic PlanningOrganizational Diagnostic
Phase 2: Sharing three main components of the draft multi-year plan for review
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3