39
Is Australia on a Sustainability Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? Path? – Interpreting the Clues* – Interpreting the Clues* Alan Randall** Alan Randall** ---------------------- ---------------------- * * Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 52:77- 95, 2008 52:77- 95, 2008 ** I am grateful for research assistance from Erick Davidson ** I am grateful for research assistance from Erick Davidson

Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

  • Upload
    makala

  • View
    40

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*. Alan Randall** ---------------------- * Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 52:77- 95, 2008 ** I am grateful for research assistance from Erick Davidson. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Is Australia on a Sustainability Path?Is Australia on a Sustainability Path?

– Interpreting the Clues*– Interpreting the Clues*

Alan Randall**Alan Randall**

--------------------------------------------

* * Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 52:77- 95, 200852:77- 95, 2008

** I am grateful for research assistance from Erick Davidson** I am grateful for research assistance from Erick Davidson

Page 2: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Sustainability – Sustainability – … meeting the needs of the present without … meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needscompromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (World (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987) Commission on Environment and Development, 1987)

A closer look at the assumptions A closer look at the assumptions (Solow, 1974)(Solow, 1974)

YYtt = e = e (a –g)t(a –g)t f(D f(Dtt , K , Kt t , L, Lt t ))

YY : aggregate output or welfare : aggregate output or welfare

DD : natural resources,: natural resources, K K :: capital, capital, LL : labor … and they are very good : labor … and they are very good substitutes in producing substitutes in producing Y Y

aa : technological progress, : technological progress, gg : population growth : population growth

The key result The key result – human welfare can be maintained for a very long time– human welfare can be maintained for a very long time

even as even as D D diminishes, so long asdiminishes, so long as K K accumulates accumulates

so long as so long as aa is as great as is as great as gg

One interpretation – It’s all about maintaining human welfare

Page 3: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

It’s all about maintaining human welfareIt’s all about maintaining human welfare

This kind of thinking provides the foundation for This kind of thinking provides the foundation for

Weak SustainabilityWeak Sustainability

The Hartwick Rule – roughly, welfare is sustainable so long as The Hartwick Rule – roughly, welfare is sustainable so long as extraction of exhaustible resources is compensated by extraction of exhaustible resources is compensated by commensurate investment in capital or renewable resourcescommensurate investment in capital or renewable resources

See also Jack Pezzey, Michael Toman, Geir Ascheim, Kirk See also Jack Pezzey, Michael Toman, Geir Ascheim, Kirk HamiltonHamilton

Green Accounting Green Accounting

Genuine Savings Genuine Savings

Adjusted Net SavingsAdjusted Net Savings

Page 4: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Genuine SavingsGenuine Savings

GG = ∑ = ∑ ppi i . ∆K. ∆Kii

where the where the KKi i include include

gross national savinggross national saving

education expenditureeducation expenditure

depreciation depreciation

depletion of mineralsdepletion of minerals

net depletion of forestsnet depletion of forests

net depletion of water resources – quantity/qualitynet depletion of water resources – quantity/quality

depletion of biodiversity depletion of biodiversity

net pollution damage (inc. GHG)net pollution damage (inc. GHG)

net degradation/enhancement of soilnet degradation/enhancement of soil

Page 5: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Composition of Adjusted Net Savings, Australia, 1970-2004

Gross national savings

Consumption fixed capital

Net national savings

Educational expenditure

Resource , envir depletion

Adjusted net savings

Year

Percentof GDP

Page 6: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Composition of Resource and Environmental Depletion,Australia, 1970-2004

Net forest depletion

Energy depletion

Mineral depletion

CO2 emissions

Fine particulatesemissions

Year

Percentof GDP

Page 7: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Australia

Canada

France

United Kingdom

United States

Year

Percentof GDP

Adjusted Net Savings, Selected OECD Countries, 1970-2004

Page 8: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Adjusted net savings predicts future welfareAdjusted net savings predicts future welfare

PV of growth in consumption vs. adjusted net savings, PV of growth in consumption vs. adjusted net savings, 19801980

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Genuine Saving % GDP

PV

of

de

lta

C %

GD

P

Page 9: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Countries dependent on exhaustible resources tend to Countries dependent on exhaustible resources tend to have negative adjusted net savingshave negative adjusted net savings

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Gen

uine

sav

ing

% G

NI

Mineral and energy rents %GNI

Adjusted net savings vs. exhaustible resource dependenceAdjusted net savings vs. exhaustible resource dependence

Page 10: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

-50.0

-40.0

-30.0

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Adjusted Net Savings (incl. China, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela) 1970-2004

Australia

Canada

China

Saudi Arabia

Venezuela

Year

Percentof GDP

Page 11: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Composition of Wealth, selected countries, 2000Composition of Wealth, selected countries, 2000

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

AUS CAN FRA GBR USA CHN IRN VEN

Intangible

Produced

Natural

Wealth/cap ($,000.0) 371.0 325.0 468.0 408.8 512.6 9.4 24.0 45.2

Page 12: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

0 5,000 10,00015,00020,00025,00030,000

Subsoil assets

Timber resources

NTFR

PA

Crop land

Pasture land

Natural capital

Composition of Australia’s Natural Capital, 2000

PA: protected areasNTFR: non-timber forest resources

100%

23.1

18.1%

5.9%

2.3%

3.1%

47.5%

Natural capital (S/cap)

Page 13: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

So, from a weak sustainability viewpoint …So, from a weak sustainability viewpoint …

Available ANS data suggests that Australia is muddling Available ANS data suggests that Australia is muddling along …along …

doing better than many resource exporting countries (the doing better than many resource exporting countries (the negative savers)negative savers)

but not so well as Canada, which seems similarly situatedbut not so well as Canada, which seems similarly situated

But, ANS data is incomplete in some important respectsBut, ANS data is incomplete in some important respects

Page 14: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Adjusted net savings – Adjusted net savings – what’s missing?what’s missing?

Composition of adjusted net savings, Australia, 1971 - 2004Composition of adjusted net savings, Australia, 1971 - 2004

net depletion of water resources – quantity/qualitynet depletion of water resources – quantity/quality

depletion of biodiversity depletion of biodiversity

net pollution damage (except COnet pollution damage (except CO22))

net degradation/enhancement of soil (+, -) net degradation/enhancement of soil (+, -)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Gross national savingsConsumption of fixed capital

Net national savings

Educational expenditure

Resource, envir depletionAdjusted net savings

Page 15: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

We might track these missing items because We might track these missing items because …… we want more informative Green Capital Accounts we want more informative Green Capital Accounts

or because or because …… we worry that prudent resource-specific conservation policies might we worry that prudent resource-specific conservation policies might be necessary, in the cases of certain key resourcesbe necessary, in the cases of certain key resources

We might consider whether resource-specific conservation We might consider whether resource-specific conservation policies are needed for policies are needed for depletion of water resources – quantity/qualitydepletion of water resources – quantity/quality

depletion of biodiversity depletion of biodiversity

degradation/enhancement of soildegradation/enhancement of soil

If these policies are simple corrections for market failure, we If these policies are simple corrections for market failure, we would still be in the realm of Weak Sustainabilitywould still be in the realm of Weak Sustainability

But if more is required than getting the prices right, that may take But if more is required than getting the prices right, that may take us down a Strong Sustainability trackus down a Strong Sustainability track

Page 16: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Productivity of agriculture is increasingProductivity of agriculture is increasing

But at what resource/environmental cost?But at what resource/environmental cost?

Page 17: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Agriculture – Agriculture – a more complete accountinga more complete accounting

Asset CategoryAsset Category

Accounting termAccounting term

Land assetLand asset Other environmentalOther environmental

assetsassets

Change in stockChange in stock

Soil erosion, Soil erosion, degradation, degradation, enhancementenhancement

Loss, gain of habitats, Loss, gain of habitats, speciesspecies

Water abstractionWater abstraction

Exhaustible resource Exhaustible resource abstraction abstraction

Change in stockChange in stock

Degradation, Degradation, improvement of improvement of landscape amenitieslandscape amenities

Air pollution (inc. dust Air pollution (inc. dust and allergens)and allergens)

Water pollutionWater pollution

Flow of environmental Flow of environmental servicesservices

Landscape amenitiesLandscape amenities

Land-based Land-based biodiversity servicesbiodiversity services

Nuisance (noise, odor)Nuisance (noise, odor)

Waste generation Waste generation

Page 18: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Australian Water Resources Assessment 2000Surface water and groundwater - availability and quality

Australian Natural Resources Atlas

AUSTRALIAN DRYLAND SALINITY ASSESSMENT 2000

Australia – State of the Environment 2006Comprehensive Natural Resources

and Environmental Assessments

Page 19: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Overdevelopment of surface water Overdevelopment of surface water – – allocationallocation

Total consumption has increased 65% in a decade

Page 20: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Water Quality Water Quality – phosphate, nitrate loads in streams are – phosphate, nitrate loads in streams are increasingincreasing

NitratesNitrates

PhosphatesPhosphates

Page 21: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Biodiversity – Biodiversity – Rare & Threatened SpeciesRare & Threatened Species

Vegetation lost to land clearingVegetation lost to land clearing

Page 22: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Natural Resources are Under Stress Natural Resources are Under Stress – and it is possible that – and it is possible that Genuine Savings in Australia is systematically lower than ANSGenuine Savings in Australia is systematically lower than ANS

But what does that imply for sustainability?But what does that imply for sustainability?

Other economic indicators Other economic indicators (other than GS, ANS)(other than GS, ANS)

There is a long tradition of tracking There is a long tradition of tracking resources pricesresources prices (better yet, (better yet, rentsrents) as ) as scarcity indicators scarcity indicators

No discernable trend of increasing resource commodity pricesNo discernable trend of increasing resource commodity prices

Water market-prices are of potential interest, but variability masks trends Water market-prices are of potential interest, but variability masks trends

It seems that It seems that factor intensityfactor intensity of air (as a sink for waste) is decreasing . of air (as a sink for waste) is decreasing . Despite more efficient use of environmental capital, there is evidence of Despite more efficient use of environmental capital, there is evidence of increasing scarcity increasing scarcity (Thampapillai). (Thampapillai). It all adds up to scarcity increasing at a slower It all adds up to scarcity increasing at a slower rate.rate.

Imagine we knew that factor intensity was decreasing, too, for land clearing, Imagine we knew that factor intensity was decreasing, too, for land clearing, irrigation water, nutrients in surface water, etc.irrigation water, nutrients in surface water, etc.

This might provide a clue that a weak sustainability track for Australia is This might provide a clue that a weak sustainability track for Australia is attainable, provided we attend to particular resources under stress attainable, provided we attend to particular resources under stress

Page 23: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Particular resources under stress – Particular resources under stress – Getting the Prices Getting the Prices RightRight

Regulatory instrumentsRegulatory instruments

Pigovian pricesPigovian prices

Markets in Markets in Water Water

Water markets expanding – attempts to rationalize entitlements and Water markets expanding – attempts to rationalize entitlements and markets in fragmented systemsmarkets in fragmented systems

Permanent sales have been miniscule, flow rents up to 10% of Permanent sales have been miniscule, flow rents up to 10% of annual allotments – Connected Murray River systemannual allotments – Connected Murray River system

13% of river basins have environmental flow plans – many others 13% of river basins have environmental flow plans – many others have temporary flow requirementshave temporary flow requirements

Pollution reduction credits Pollution reduction credits South Creek bubbleSouth Creek bubble

Hunter River salinityHunter River salinity

Page 24: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Getting the Prices Right Getting the Prices Right (cont.)(cont.)

Markets in – Markets in –

Habitat conservation Habitat conservation

Bush Tender pilot projects – contracts auctioned, no after-marketBush Tender pilot projects – contracts auctioned, no after-market

Dryland salinityDryland salinity

Several pilot projectsSeveral pilot projects

Murray-Darling Basin salinityMurray-Darling Basin salinity

Trading credits among states – no trades recordedTrading credits among states – no trades recorded

Carbon Carbon

Initiated in NSW 2005Initiated in NSW 2005

Page 25: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Is weak sustainability enough?Is weak sustainability enough?

Perhaps it is, for Perhaps it is, for water water and and pollutionpollution, although particular , although particular cases may require morecases may require more

Even weak sustainability asks us to do much more than Even weak sustainability asks us to do much more than we are doing nowwe are doing now

Habitat conservationHabitat conservation and and biodiversitybiodiversity likely require likely require attention to specific resources in particular casesattention to specific resources in particular cases

The political impediments to systematic weak The political impediments to systematic weak sustainability are so substantial that solutions in the sustainability are so substantial that solutions in the real world may involve some deviations from WS, real world may involve some deviations from WS, shored-up with (very) piecemeal strong sustainability shored-up with (very) piecemeal strong sustainability instrumentsinstruments

Page 26: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

ClimateClimate

COCO22 increasing increasing

Temperatures risingTemperatures rising

Page 27: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Getting the prices right for climateGetting the prices right for climate

InsuranceInsurance

Catastrophic risk insurance and reinsuranceCatastrophic risk insurance and reinsurance

Carbon/GHG taxesCarbon/GHG taxes

Tradable carbon permitsTradable carbon permits

OpportunitiesOpportunities for farmers to produce CRCs for farmers to produce CRCs

But monitoring and enforcement matter. The goal is a GHG reduction delivery system for global society, not just …

Page 28: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Not just … Not just …

Page 29: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Are Weak Sustainability Solutions Enough for Climate?Are Weak Sustainability Solutions Enough for Climate?

First, we are a very long way from implementing First, we are a very long way from implementing systematic weak sustainability solutions for climatesystematic weak sustainability solutions for climate

Weak sustainability solutions for climate involve Weak sustainability solutions for climate involve systematic provision of global public goods … no easy systematic provision of global public goods … no easy task for economics, politics, and diplomacytask for economics, politics, and diplomacy

If strong sustainability solutions are needed, we may not If strong sustainability solutions are needed, we may not have the global social-political capital to get it donehave the global social-political capital to get it done

Page 30: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Dryland Salinity, 2000Dryland Salinity, 2000

Page 31: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Dryland Salinity, 2020Dryland Salinity, 2020

Page 32: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Dryland Salinity, 2050Dryland Salinity, 2050

Page 33: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Getting the prices right for dryland salinityGetting the prices right for dryland salinity

Suppose we know factor intensity of salinity is decreasingSuppose we know factor intensity of salinity is decreasingMuch less comfort in this case Much less comfort in this case – because damage is irreversible, it would – because damage is irreversible, it would just mean that we are “mining the soil” a little more slowlyjust mean that we are “mining the soil” a little more slowly

What are the market failures?What are the market failures?Common pool problem? Common pool problem? Evidence suggests the common pool aspect of Evidence suggests the common pool aspect of this problem is of modest dimensionsthis problem is of modest dimensions

Myopia? Myopia? But let’s face it … strong prevention and mitigation measures are But let’s face it … strong prevention and mitigation measures are unprofitable at any realistic discount rateunprofitable at any realistic discount rate

Perhaps this is Perhaps this is a genuine strong sustainability problema genuine strong sustainability problem

Page 34: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

A Sustainability PuzzleA Sustainability Puzzle

Imagine an opportunity that would make us enormously rich but would lead eventually and with certainty to environmental crisis. We are infinitely long-lived, so we would both enjoy the riches and bear the disaster

Should we accept this opportunity?

Page 35: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Should we accept this opportunity?Should we accept this opportunity?

1. Of course we should! We’ll be enormously rich when the disaster comes, so we can bribe the disaster to go away … pay to prevent it … pay to fix up after it

2. No, we should not accept it! Perhaps all our riches will be to no avail; the disaster just won’t respond

[This is exactly what we mean when we worry about possible exhaustion of an essential resource]

Note: 1 weak sustainability

2 strong sustainability

Page 36: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Strong Sustainability and the Precautionary PrincipleStrong Sustainability and the Precautionary Principle

Strong sustainabilityStrong sustainability has been variously defined ashas been variously defined as

A Strict Policy Prescription A Strict Policy Prescription

Sustain renewable resources in kind … “cut a tree, plant a tree” Sustain renewable resources in kind … “cut a tree, plant a tree”

AndAnd compensate for exhaustible resource extraction with commensurate compensate for exhaustible resource extraction with commensurate investments in renewable resourcesinvestments in renewable resources

Any claim that particular forms of capital should be maintained independently of the aggregate capital maintained under weak sustainability

The Precautionary Principle The Precautionary Principle – there are dozens of definitions. Here is – there are dozens of definitions. Here is mine mine

In deference to credible threat of asymmetric risk, we should take In deference to credible threat of asymmetric risk, we should take avoidance and mitigation measures beyond those justified by expected avoidance and mitigation measures beyond those justified by expected welfare considerations.welfare considerations.

Page 37: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Justifications for Sustainability PoliciesJustifications for Sustainability Policies

Weak sustainabilityWeak sustainability Utilitarian to the core Utilitarian to the core (but that doesn’t make it non-controversial)(but that doesn’t make it non-controversial)

Strong sustainabilityStrong sustainability Utilitarian justifications are difficultUtilitarian justifications are difficult

Many competing non-utilitarian justifications … most argue Many competing non-utilitarian justifications … most argue from asserted principles of various kindsfrom asserted principles of various kinds

A sensible middle ground – weak sustainability for business as A sensible middle ground – weak sustainability for business as usual, with strong sustainability exceptions for special casesusual, with strong sustainability exceptions for special cases

Strong sustainability exceptions justified by principles that would be Strong sustainability exceptions justified by principles that would be honored by many different moral systemshonored by many different moral systems

Don’t sell-out something unique and valuable for modest gainDon’t sell-out something unique and valuable for modest gain Don’t take inordinate risks for modest gainDon’t take inordinate risks for modest gain Don’t impose big risks on the publicDon’t impose big risks on the public for modest private gainfor modest private gain Don’t imposeDon’t impose big risks on the future for modest immediate gainbig risks on the future for modest immediate gain

Page 38: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

Understanding the Precautionary Principle Understanding the Precautionary Principle as a Principleas a Principle

What do we mean by principles?What do we mean by principles?

Principles are moral intuitions that are prior to moral systems – Principles are moral intuitions that are prior to moral systems – many moral systems may recognize a particular principlemany moral systems may recognize a particular principle

A principle is not a complete moral system, but must anticipate A principle is not a complete moral system, but must anticipate and account for competing and conflicting principlesand account for competing and conflicting principles

To call a moral statement a principle does not grant it lexical To call a moral statement a principle does not grant it lexical priority over other principlespriority over other principles

Yet, a principle is much more than a preference – we feel a Yet, a principle is much more than a preference – we feel a serious moral loss when we have to compromise a principle in a serious moral loss when we have to compromise a principle in a particular caseparticular case

Agreed principles provide a frame for policy resolutionAgreed principles provide a frame for policy resolution

Page 39: Is Australia on a Sustainability Path? – Interpreting the Clues*

What can we reasonably ask government to doWhat can we reasonably ask government to do, , in an era in an era when government seems afraid of governing?when government seems afraid of governing?

Do more to get the prices rightDo more to get the prices right Pigovian taxes Pigovian taxes

Facilitate marketsFacilitate markets

Regulatory approachesRegulatory approaches

Articulate clear principles and take them seriously in practiceArticulate clear principles and take them seriously in practice Commitment to strong sustainability exceptions in cases that exceed a Commitment to strong sustainability exceptions in cases that exceed a

threshold of concernthreshold of concern

Commitment to transparent and inclusive public decision processesCommitment to transparent and inclusive public decision processes

Commitment to equitable sharing of burdens – esp. burdens undertaken Commitment to equitable sharing of burdens – esp. burdens undertaken to benefit future generationsto benefit future generations

Bind managers to principles, but encourage them to interpret principles Bind managers to principles, but encourage them to interpret principles in practice via a serious policy dialogue in practice via a serious policy dialogue

Neither Neither planning to the 4th decimal place, planning to the 4th decimal place, nor nor abdication to stakeholder abdication to stakeholder conventionsconventions