8/17/2019 Is there a god? We don't need no theology! And what does physics say to all of this?

1/3

AN EXPLANATION OF OMNIPOTENCE

M. N. G. EINSTEIN

Abstract.   This work deals with the statements of physics on the fundamentalquestion of a god or gods in our universe and their existence. Starting fromthe Friedmann equations, it will be shown how such an entity, if it existed,would interact with the cosmos and what conclusions we can draw from it.

Contents

1. Is there a god? 11.1. Absoluteness 12. Oh god−oh−god 23. Annotation 34. Footnote 35. Summarium 3References 3

1.   Is there a god?

This is one question I get asked a lot. Many think, it is out of our reach andwe can not answer it, either because we do not have the technical advantages yetand or simply because of our mental lack (of knowledge) for a proper scientificanalysis and or due to the opinion, that it is a theological question, which all hasto be considered as total nonsense. That question is actually quite easy to answer!Surprisingly. Therefore, is there a god or maybe even more than one?

1.1.   Absoluteness.   To be able to analyse the question, we first need a way tohandle it properly. Thus, we conclude:

Definition 1.1.  A god is a being with a lot of abilities, which includes the om-nipotence.

With that, we have found a very good method to continue and this is all we need

for a further discussion.

Date : 25. März, 2016.

1

8/17/2019 Is there a god? We don't need no theology! And what does physics say to all of this?

2/3

8/17/2019 Is there a god? We don't need no theology! And what does physics say to all of this?

3/3

AN EXPLANATION OF OMNIPOTENCE 3

3.   Annotation

This form of evidence was proposed by Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch. However, thepaper here follows my own understanding and is therefore consequently my ownelaboration.

4.   Footnote

Some will now appeal and interject logically, but, if such a Existentia existswith an omnipotence, would not this mean, that it would be also able, everyincrease of   |M (C (ti))|   above the critical value (|M (C (ti))|   > M krit) to equalise(|M (C (ti))| ≤  M krit); and that would lead the proof to absurdity. Unfortunately,such an assumption is in many ways totally wrong. Because, the most definitiveconsequence would be, according to the fundamental law of thermodynamics, a de-struction of energy and entropy, two key quantities in our universe. Such a changewould have to be always observable (in the structure of the universe, in the simplest

sense, it would be an interference with the background radiation).

On the other hand, the question, where such a figure came from has to be an-swered without any doubt and error, which no theology can.

5.   Summarium

In summary, we can say, that our very own existence prevents the entity of agod or even of many gods. This should not be confused with a matrix or otherfalse knowledge pretending worlds. Although this would be in a reality with somephysical laws and therefore can not contain a god or godlike being as well; and evenwithin a false mirroring world, there can not be an omnipotent being, since everyfigure in that world would be, again, bound to/by the laws of physics.

References

[1] Bergmann and Schaefer. Lehrbuch der Experimentalphysik, Sterne und Weltraum.