Isi Proposal Program Magister

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    1/20

    1

    I. INTRODUCTION

    A. Background of ProblemTeaching students from the different school backgrounds is not an easy way to

    improve their vocabulary. Some ways has been applied to practice students to achieve

    the vocabulary mastery better; however, it has not been changed what they have

    known before. They still have not enough glossaries to express their mastery both

    speaking and understanding simple text as appropriate as their level in one of English

    Language Courses in Sidenreng Rappang.

    Relating to the reason above, it needs a divergent way in order that the

    students own enough expressions to apply in their daily activity when they attend the

    teaching process in the courses or when they are outside the class. Owning sufficient

    words support the student competence to keep four language skills because without

    having it, they will face difficulty to utilize in written and oral language.

    Vocabulary teaching is one of the most important components of any

    language class. The main reason is the fact that it is a medium, which carries

    meaning; learning to understand and express the meaning is what counts in learning

    languages. Moreover, vocabulary functions as a basis without it, any language could

    not exist. Speaking would be meaningless and perhaps impossible having only

    structure without vocabulary. The word vocabulary generally represents a summary

    of words or their combinations in a particular language.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    2/20

    2

    As the researcher said before that to keep students own adequate vocabulary,

    it needs a different way to improve students vocabulary not only to write but also to

    apply it. The best way the researcher thinks is by means of visual aids in teaching

    vocabulary. As an instructor, she is interested in applying different teaching technique

    to introduce the meaning of new words. Using visual aids is one of the teaching

    techniques in which the researcher tries to apply in her teaching.

    The aids that help in teaching languages and that can be seen are called 'visual

    aids'. They provide practical solutions to the problems of a language teacher whose

    equipment, as a rule, consists of nothing more than books and classroom. They

    include blackboard, chart maps, pictures, flannel-boards, filmstrips, slides,

    epidiascope, and actual objects that facilitate the process of teaching.

    Nation (1990:51) lists a number of basic techniques through which teachers

    can explain the meanings of new words, all of which can be used in the young learner

    classroom. Some of these techniques involve the use of pictures from a variety of

    sources - pictures from computers; photographs; drawings or diagrams on the board;

    and pictures from books. It will be interesting in this study to see which techniques

    teachers use.

    Besides that Harmer (2001: 134), pictures should be appropriate not only for

    the language to be learned but also for the classes they are being used for; if pictures

    are too childish students may not like them and if they are culturally inappropriate

    they can offend people. Pictures also need to be visibleespecially if they are being

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    3/20

    3

    shown to the whole class they need to be big enough for everyone to see. Moreover, it

    helps if pictures are durablethat is, strong enough to be used several times.

    In order to make comfortable condition for students in teaching vocabulary by

    using visual aids, the researcher will apply one of teaching models as it called Team

    Game Tournament or TGT. This means to stimulate the students more capable in

    improving their vocabulary not only words stand alone but also applying in

    sentences that used in verbal or non verbal socialization.

    According to Slavin (1995), Team Games Tournament (TGT) is one of

    learning strategies for review and mastery learning of material. He has found that

    TGT increased basic skills, students achievement, positive interactions among

    students, acceptance of mainstreamed classmates and self-esteem.

    To sum up, applying Team Games Tournament by using visual aids in

    teaching new words makes the teaching process enjoyable and memorable and also

    attract students attention and deepen their understanding of vocabulary. Besides that

    using visual aids can also assist the students with abstract words, as associating the

    words with a concrete object makes these words easier to remember.

    Thats why, the researcher is keen on finding out the effect applying Team

    Games Tournament in improving students vocabulary by using visual aids in English

    Conversation School in Pangkajene Sidrap, academic year 2012/2013.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    4/20

    4

    B. Problem StatementsBased on the background above, it is formulated two research questions. The

    following will be presented on the specific focus for the study:

    1. How can be applied Team Games Tournament in improving students

    vocabulary using visual aids?

    2. How do visual aids assist students in comprehending and remembering

    new vocabulary?

    C. Objectives of ResearchThe purpose of this study is to find out the effectiveness of team games

    tournament (TGT) in improving students vocabulary by using visual aids. A further

    subsidiary aim is to assist students in comprehending and remembering new

    vocabulary.

    D. Significance of ResearchThe benefits can be obtained after doing research, that is: i) the theoretical

    benefits and ii) practical benefits.

    As for the benefits mentioned above as follows;

    1. Theoretical Signifancea. Adding comprehension about application of cooperative learning, especially in

    MODAPUTA-English Conversation School Pangkajene Sidrap with the aim

    to improve students' vocabulary by using visual aids.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    5/20

    5

    b. As a reference for other researchers who want to get more information about

    one of learning model application, that is; Teams-Games-Tournament.

    2. Practical Significancea. For management of the institutions

    Providing input in the improvement of innovative teaching and learning toenhance the learning of vocabulary.

    b. For the mentors As a reference for the mentors or instructors in creating a fun learning

    more creative and innovative.

    c. For students1) Motivating students to improve their vocabulary.2) Encouraging each other to compete in achieving success learning

    vocabulary.

    3) Creating an atmosphere of learning that not forcing students to learn.d. For Researchers

    1) Studying the implementation of the cooperative learning model toimprove students' vocabulary at one of institutions in Pangkajene Sidrap.

    2) Applying research capability in completing a graduate program atuniversity of Muhammadiyah Parepare.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    6/20

    6

    II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

    A. Concept of Literature Review1. The Definition of Teaching Strategy

    Teaching strategy is very important for teachers before presenting the material

    of the subject in class. Based on this concept, a teacher expected to be able to

    organize class in order to create the comfortable atmosphere for students and the

    students can learn cheerfully. Therefore, presented in the following some views from

    experts about teaching strategy.

    Hornby (1974) stated that teaching means the occupation, profession, or work

    of a teacher, besides that teaching is the imparting of knowledge, developing of skills

    and attitudes, and meeting of special needs in various ways ranging from structured to

    individualized activities, including instructional support activities that aid and enrich

    the teaching-learning process.

    Crowther (1995: 1225) said that teaching is the work of teacher and a plan

    designed for a particular purpose, the process of planning something or carrying out a

    plan in a skillful way. It can be said that teaching strategy is a way how the teacher

    educates with the plan designed in order to get the determined aim.

    And Readence, et.al., (1989 : 214) stressed that a strategy is not an accident

    but is rather the planned means to end. In general, teaching strategies have some

    characteristics, that is; helping students focus attention on important information,

    providing students with meaningful study goals, assisting students organize

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    7/20

    7

    information, causing students to practice, and encouraging deep processing of

    information.

    Besides that Oxford (1990: 7-17) reveals that strategies are specific actions

    taken by the teacher to make learning and teaching easier, faster, more enjoyable,

    more self-directed, more effective, and more transferable. He divided teaching

    strategies into two aspects; they are direct and indirect strategies. The direct

    strategies, in which teacher is encouraged to create mental linkage, apply images and

    sounds, review things well, and employ them in action, and the indirect strategies

    means teacher gives confidence to students center, arrange, plan, and then evaluate

    their learning.

    2. Teams-Games-Tournament (TGT)Teams-Games-Tournament is one of the team learning strategies designed by

    Robert Slavin for review and mastery learning of material. Slavin has found that TGT

    increased basic skills, students achievement, positive interactions between students,

    acceptance of mainstreamed classmates and self-esteem.

    Slavin (1995) explained that by applying TGT, students learn material in

    class; this can be taught traditionally, in small groups, individually, using activities,

    etc. The heterogeneous study teams review the material, then students compete in

    academically homogeneous tournament teams. And students bring from 2-6 points

    back from their tournament to their study teams. Points are totaled and normalized

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    8/20

    8

    (for a group size of 4). It is the study team that is successful. It should be noted that

    the tournament based on material often for which there is a specific correct answer.

    In the following, it will be presented the procedure of TGT;

    1. Study Teams (also called Home Teams)

    The students reinforce, review and study the material cooperatively in these

    teams.

    Set-up: Heterogeneous Teams

    a) Generate a ranked class list of all students. The ranking should be academic,

    by marks.

    b) Team size: 4 students, to make the teams, divide the total number of

    students by 4. (32 students 4 = 8)

    c) Number students, beginning at the top.

    Reverse the numbering the second time through.

    e.g. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,1,2,... etc.

    d) This will generate academically heterogeneous teams of about equal ability.

    Balance the teams for sex, ethnicity, etc. while trying to maintain academic

    equalness.

    2. Tournament

    After the designated study time, the students then compete in the

    tournament.

    Set-up: Homogeneous (Tournament) Teams

    a) Use the same ranked student list.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    9/20

    9

    b) Form groups of three (alternate size is 4).

    c) Cluster students by 3's, going down the ranked student list. This will result

    in the 3 strongest students competing together, the 3 weakest together, etc.

    Format:

    a) Have a deck of numbered cards (1 - 30) available for each tournament table.

    b) Make up a worksheet of 30 numbered questions.

    c) Make up a numbered answer sheet.

    d) Each team picks up an envelope/deck of cards, question sheet, and answer

    sheet.

    e) Students draw cards at each table. The highest number goes first.

    f) The first student pulls a card from the envelope and reads out the number.

    The second student (with the question sheet) reads the question aloud. The

    first student answers the question. The third student (with the answer sheet)

    tells if the answer is correct. If correct, the first student keeps the card. If

    incorrect, the question (2nd) student may challenge answer. If they get the

    answer correct, they may keep the card. If still incorrect, the card goes to a

    discard pile.

    g) The game proceeds clockwise. After each question (whether correct or

    incorrect) each student changes jobs. It continues until the time is up.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    10/20

    10

    3. Scoring

    Scoring is done for all the tournament tables. Each player will take back

    2 to 6 points to their Study Team. Study Team points are totaled. They need to

    be normalized to a group size of four. (Study teams of 5 students will bring

    back more points; teams of 3, fewer points.)

    4. Bumping

    The members of tournament tables can be bumped up or down. Each

    winner moved to a higher-level table, the loser moves to an easier table.

    This ensures that all students are playing with same-ability students and are

    winners about equally often.

    3. Teaching of VocabularyVocabulary functions as a cornerstone without which any language could not

    exist. Speaking would be meaningless and perhaps impossible having only structure

    without vocabulary. The word vocabulary generally represents a summary of words

    or their combinations in a particular language. However, we should bear in mind, as

    Ur (2000: 60) remarked, that one item of vocabulary can consist of more than one

    word. E.g. post-office consists of two words and still expresses one idea.

    Vocabulary teaching is one of the most important components of any

    language class. The main reason is the fact that it is a medium, which carries

    meaning; learning to understand and express the meaning is what counts in learning

    languages.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    11/20

    11

    According to Thornbury (2004: 4) stated that there has been increased focus

    on teaching vocabulary, as a result of the development of new approaches to language

    teaching, which are much more word-centered.

    Ur (2000: 60) agreed in listing the fundamental features, which need to be

    included within vocabulary teaching. Besides knowing the form of the word, students

    also need to be familiar with its grammar. Students need to know e.g. irregular forms

    of verbs or plural nouns, the position of adjectives, etc.

    Harmer (1993: 156-157) stressed that students should know how to change a

    word form and when to use it. Teaching the meaning includes mainly connecting a

    word with its equivalent in the real world. It is called denotation. Apart from

    denotation, connotation of the word (associations and feelings, which arise when the

    word is heard) should be taught. Many vocabulary items have several meanings

    depending on context. Furthermore, students need to be provided with the word sense

    relations to other words. There are various relationships such as synonyms, antonyms,

    hyponyms etc.

    Ur (2000: 62) said that another challenge the student will face when learning a

    new item is collocation. That means he or she needs to know which words can be

    used in connection with each other and how. E.g. when learning the word picture,

    the student should be informed that one can take a picture, not make a picture. On top

    of that, the student needs to acquire the ability to recognize when it is appropriate to

    use a particular word - speaking or writing, informal conversation with a friend or

    formal polite conversation.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    12/20

    12

    4. Definition of Visual AidsThere are wide varieties of teaching aids available to the language teacher. It

    should be considered to apply a range of these in teaching. One of the most

    commonly used teaching aids is the blackboard or white board. Moreover, visual aids

    such as flash cards, postcards, and magazine photos are very useful when it used in

    teaching.

    Hubbard, P. et.al. (1983) stated that the blackboard is probably the most

    commonly used and most teachers would find teaching without one to be a challenge,

    it is also the case that teachers frequently do not adequately consider how to present

    material on the board. It is generally considered a good practice to list the lessons

    objectives on the board and leave them up throughout the session, for the students to

    refer to. It is also helpful to leave a running list of vocabulary on one part of the

    board. The central part of the board can be used for examples, charts, drawings, etc.,

    which will generally only be left up for one part of the lesson.

    Wright (1989) said that it also needs to consider the range of visual aids that

    might help in teaching vocabulary. Photos from magazines, postcards, books, etc can

    be very useful for teaching if chosen carefully. Many teachers find it useful to collect

    a file of these materials for easy access. These can be used for discussion; illustrating

    grammar points, description, for the basis of role-plays, etc.

    Various types of flash cards are also useful for teaching activities. Flash cards

    generally have words, pictures, or a combination of the two. There are commercially

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    13/20

    13

    available cards, cards that can be made by cutting pictures from magazines, etc., or

    the teacher can make them him/herself with drawings and writing. They can be used

    for a wide variety of activities, from drills to matching activities, to different

    communicative activities.

    Holt (1995) provides the following basic kit of teaching aids, including

    objects, games, and materials. They are; 1) realia: clocks, food items, calendars,

    plastic fruits and vegetables, maps, household objects, real and play money, food

    containers, abacus, manual for learning to drive, and classroom objects; 2) flash

    cards: pictures, words, and signs; 3) pictures or photographs: personal, magazine, and

    others; 4) tape recorder and cassette tapes, including music for imagery and

    relaxation; 5) overhead projector, transparencies, and pens; video player and videos;

    6) pocket chart for numbers, letters, and pictures; 7) alphabet sets, 8) camera for

    language experience stories to create biographies and autobiographies; 9) games such

    as bingo and concentration: commercial or teacher-made; 10) colored index cards to

    teach word order in sentences, to show when speakers change in dialogue, to illustrate

    question/answer format, and to use as cues for a concentration game; 11) cuisenaire

    rods to teach word order in sentences, to use as manipulative in dyad activities, and to

    teach adjectives; 12) colored chalk to teach word order, to differentiate between

    speakers in a dialogue, and to illustrate question and answer format.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    14/20

    14

    III. METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH

    A. Research DesignMethodology and design used for this specific study will be based on

    quantitative design methods, which include conducting tests (pre-test and posttest)

    and giving questionnaire to students.

    B. Population and SampleThe subject of this research is the students of MODAPUTA-English

    Conversation School in Pangkajene Sidrap.

    C. Data of ResearchData of research will be got from the result of pretest, posttest, and

    questionnaire. The data of pretest is vocabulary mastery of students basic skill, and

    the data of pretest is the result of vocabulary proficiency after applying learning

    models of Teams-Games-Tournament (TG) using visual aids and a questionnaire

    given is used to find out the students response of TGT applied.

    D. Instruments of ResearchInstrument utilized to get research data is a test and a questionnaire. Test is

    prepared into two types, the first one is pretest and the second one is posttest, both of

    tests are vocabulary test. Pretest will be given to students before applying teaching

    model of TGT using visual aids, and posttest is provided after teaching application.

    Meanwhile a questionnaire will be distributed to the subject of research.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    15/20

    15

    E.Data Collection ProcedureData gathered from result of tests, and a questionnaire has to be carefully

    evaluated to confirm their worth for the purpose of the particular study. Getting the

    data of research is from three main steps. The first one is preparation, the second one

    is application, and the third one is evaluation.

    1. Preparation; the researcher will prepare teaching materials, visual aids ofvocabulary, such as; pictures, cards, and worksheet. In addition, design

    instruments such as tests (for pretest and posttest), and a questionnaire.

    2. Application; the researcher will carry out pretest before beginning research.Conducting teaching by applying TGT using visual aids for 2 (two) months and

    after that providing posttest and distributing a questionnaire to students.

    3. Evaluation; Computing the result of pretest and posttest and calculating the resultof questionnaire.

    F.Data AnalyzingTechniqueCalculating the result of questionnaire used the percentage technique is as

    follows :

    Computing the result of pretest and posttest used t-Test formula is as follows :

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    16/20

    16

    t =

    [ ]

    Where :

    = The Mean Score of Pretest = The Mean Score of Posttest

    = Sum square of Pretest

    = Sum square of Posttest = Number of students who attend Pretest = Number of students who attend Posttest

    IV. REFERENCESAllen, Virginia French. 1983. Techniques in Teaching vocabulary: Teaching

    techniques in English as a second or foreign language. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.

    Andrews, Richard. 2003. Continuum Research Questions. London : MPG Books.

    Best, John W. 1981. ResearchIn Education. New Jersey-Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Creswell, John W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and MixedMethods Approach. London : Sage Publication.inc.

    Crowther, Jonathan. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English. New

    York : Oxford University Press.

    Harmer, J. 2001. The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). London:

    Longman.

    Hubbard, P. et. Al. 1983.A Training Course for TEFL. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    17/20

    17

    Holt, G. M. 1995. Teaching Low-Level Adult ESL Students. California: CaliforniaDepartment of Education. http://www.cal.org/caela/ esl_resources/

    digests/HOLT.html/ accessed on October 2012.

    Lado, Robert. 1988. Teaching English Across Cultures : An Introduction for

    Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. New York : McGraw-Hill.

    Pianta, Robert C. 2011. Teaching Children Well: New Evidence-Based Approaches to

    Teacher Professional Development and Training. USA : the Associated

    Press/Steve Pope.

    Readence, John E, Thomas W. Bean and R. Scott Baldwin. 1989. Content Area

    Reading : An Integrated Approach. Iowa : Kendal/Hunt Publishing Company.

    Reynolds, William M an Gloria E. Miller. 2003. Handbook Of Psychology :Educational Psychology, Vol. 7. Canada : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Slavin, Robert E. 1990. Teams-Games-Tournaments: Cooperative Learning

    Strategies. USA : Allyn and Bacon.

    ___________. 1995. Classroom Applications of Cooperative Learning. USA: Johns

    Hopkins University and University of York.

    McCoy, Douglas. 2007. Visuals and Vocabulary: The Order of Presentation Matters.

    AIU : Edu 612-0704A-01.

    Nation, I.S.P. 2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press.

    Oxford, R. L. 1990 Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should

    Know.New York, U: Newbury House. [USA:Heinle & Heinle Publishers].

    Thornbury, Scott. How to Teach Vocabulary. Essex: Pearson Education Limited,

    2004. ISBN 0582-429668

    Ur, Penny. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press, 2000. ISBN-0521-44994-4

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    18/20

    18

    V. APPENDIXESA. Pretest

    1. Words ScrambleUnscramble the following words:

    1) oth __________________________2) pto __________________________3) tpso __________________________4) rinbg __________________________5) cctha __________________________6) eifv __________________________7) tow __________________________8) eterh __________________________9) labck __________________________10) rgene __________________________

    2. Missing WordsComplete the missing letters in the following words

    1) Lirar = _________________________2) Sigi..g = _________________________3) Fiis = _________________________4) Witig = _________________________5) Pantng = _________________________

    3. Words Search

    not pot flop catch three

    hot spot bring five black

    got stop make two green

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    19/20

    19

    B. Postest1. Scramble Test

    Unscramble the following words:

    1) teg __________________________2) elt __________________________3) etm __________________________4) fcal __________________________5) upp __________________________6) ucb __________________________7) aks __________________________8) orpd __________________________9)

    drae __________________________

    10) itegh __________________________2. Missing Words

    Complete the missing letters in the following words

    1) Tecer = _____________________________2) Iprve = ______________________________3) Dlignt = ______________________________4) Lving rom = ______________________________5) Barding Hose = ______________________________

    3. Vocabulary QuizMatch the vocabulary words on the left with the definitions on the right.

    1) energetic a person associated with another in a common activity;associate.

    2) citizen the sister of one's mother or father.3) aunt pupil a person belonging by birth or naturalization to a

    political and geographic entity, esp. a nation.

    4) volunteer any person who studies under a teacher.5) outgoing full of or displaying energy; active; vigorous.6) human a person who lives close to someone else.7) partner one who offers to perform work or services without pay.8) patrol any of five ways to perceive, namely touch, smell, taste,

    sight, and hearing.

    9) neighbor reserved or ill at ease with other people; bashful.10)sense going out or leaving, as a vessel; outbound.

  • 7/27/2019 Isi Proposal Program Magister

    20/20

    20

    C. Questionnaire1. Tujuan :

    Quessionaire ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh data tentang respon siswa(peserta kursus) terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT

    dengan menggunakan alat bantu Visual dalam pelaksanaan kursus bahasa

    Inggris di MODAPUTA-English Conversation School Pangkajene Sidrap.

    2. Petunjuk Pengisian :Berilah tanda cross (X) pada kolom SS bila Sangat Setuju, kolom S bila

    Setuju, kolom TS bila Tidak Setuju, dan kolom STS bila Sangat Tidak Setujudengan pernyataan di bawah ini.

    No. Pernyataan SS S TS STS

    1.Pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu Visual sangatmenyenangkan dalam belajar Bahasa Inggris

    2.Pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu Visual tidakcocok dalam belajar Vocabulary Bahasa Inggris

    3.Pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu Visual baru

    pertama kali digunakan pada di tempat Kursus

    4.Pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu Visual sangat

    baik bila digunakan di tempat kursus

    5.Belajar Bahasa Inggris, khususnya Vocabulary

    tidak baik bila menggunakan pembelajaran TGTdengan alat bantu Visual

    6.Pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu Visual dapatmeningkatkan kemampuan Vocabulary pesertakursus

    7.Penerapan pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu

    Visual tidak meningkatkan kemampuanVocabulary dalam belajar Bahasa Inggris

    8.Pembelajaran TGT tanpa alat bantu Visual tidakdapat meningkatkan Vocabulary peserta kursus

    9.Pembelajaran TGT dengan alat bantu Visual seringdigunakan Mentor dalam mengajarkan Vocabulary

    10.Pembelajaran TGT tanpa alat bantu Visual dapatmeningkatkan Vocabulary peserta kursus

    Keterangan :

    1. SS = Sangat Setuju2. S = Setuju3. TS = Tidak Setuju4. STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju