Upload
vandan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary
ISSN 2320 -5083
A Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, Monthly, Open Access, Online Research Journal
Impact Factor – 1.393
VOLUME 1 ISSUE 12 JANUARY 2014
A GLOBAL SOCIETY FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
www.jiarm.com
A GREEN PUBLISHING HOUSE
Editorial Board
Dr. Kari Jabbour, Ph.D Curriculum Developer, American College of Technology, Missouri, USA.
Er.Chandramohan, M.S System Specialist - OGP ABB Australia Pvt. Ltd., Australia.
Dr. S.K. Singh Chief Scientist Advanced Materials Technology Department Institute of Minerals & Materials Technology Bhubaneswar, India
Dr. Jake M. Laguador Director, Research and Statistics Center, Lyceum of the Philippines University, Philippines.
Prof. Dr. Sharath Babu, LLM Ph.D Dean. Faculty of Law, Karnatak University Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Dr.S.M Kadri, MBBS, MPH/ICHD, FFP Fellow, Public Health Foundation of India Epidemiologist Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Kashmir, India
Dr.Bhumika Talwar, BDS Research Officer State Institute of Health & Family Welfare Jaipur, India
Dr. Tej Pratap Mall Ph.D Head, Postgraduate Department of Botany, Kisan P.G. College, Bahraich, India.
Dr. Arup Kanti Konar, Ph.D Associate Professor of Economics Achhruram, Memorial College, SKB University, Jhalda,Purulia, West Bengal. India
Dr. S.Raja Ph.D Research Associate, Madras Research Center of CMFR , Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Chennai, India
Dr. Vijay Pithadia, Ph.D, Director - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Management Rajkot, India.
Er. R. Bhuvanewari Devi M. Tech, MCIHT Highway Engineer, Infrastructure, Ramboll, Abu Dhabi, UAE Sanda Maican, Ph.D. Senior Researcher, Department of Ecology, Taxonomy and Nature Conservation Institute of Biology of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania Dr. Reynalda B. Garcia Professor, Graduate School & College of Education, Arts and Sciences Lyceum of the Philippines University Philippines Dr.Damarla Bala Venkata Ramana Senior Scientist Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA) Hyderabad, A.P, India PROF. Dr.S.V.Kshirsagar, M.B.B.S,M.S Head - Department of Anatomy, Bidar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karnataka, India. Dr Asifa Nazir, M.B.B.S, MD, Assistant Professor, Dept of Microbiology Government Medical College, Srinagar, India. Dr.AmitaPuri, Ph.D Officiating Principal Army Inst. Of Education New Delhi, India Dr. Shobana Nelasco Ph.D Associate Professor, Fellow of Indian Council of Social Science Research (On Deputation}, Department of Economics, Bharathidasan University, Trichirappalli. India M. Suresh Kumar, PHD Assistant Manager, Godrej Security Solution, India. Dr.T.Chandrasekarayya,Ph.D Assistant Professor, Dept Of Population Studies & Social Work, S.V.University, Tirupati, India.
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
544 www.jiarm.com
SELECTION FOR SUPERIOR PULPING QUALITY THROUGH PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF EUCALYPTUS CLONES
DR.S.VENNILA*
DR. S.UMESH KANNA** DR. K.T.PARTHIBAN***
*Senior Research Fellow, Forest College & Research Institute, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, India
**Assistant Professor, Forest College & Research Institute Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalyam, Tamil Nadu, India *** Professor, Forest College & Research Institute Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalyam, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
`Three Eucalyptus species viz., Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Eucalyptus tereticornis and
E. urophylla were subjected for physical, chemical analysis coupled with strength properties
for pulpwood. Considering physical properties, all clones were moderate to high range
indicated for their suitability as pulpwood. Chemical wood analysis indicated the variability
among tree species. In the proximate analysis, lignin content was moderate for all the clones
which proved their suitability as a pulp wood. The tree species differ significantly for holo-
cellulose which is essential factor for paper production. Considering this factor, the
superiority of EC MTP 48 was evident due to maximum holo-cellulose content then all other
clones. The pulp yield and kappa number analysis indicated the superiority of EC MTP 48
due to higher pulp yield and moderate kappa number. The strength properties of wood of
various clones revealed the superiority of EC MTP 48 in terms of tensile index, burst factor
and tear index for bleached pulp. Considering all the parameters into account, the clone EC
MTP 48 proved superior for pulpwood characters and this study recommends the suitability
of EC MTP 48 as an pulpwood species.
KEYWORDS: Eucalyptus Clones, Pulpwood; Physical, Chemical and Strength Properties.
INTRODUCTION
The extent and diversity of the world's forests are declining and the demand for wood
worldwide is on the rise. Much of the world's timber supply is harvested from natural forests,
while plantations contribute only 7-10 per cent of the current world industrial round wood
production (Gauthier, 1991). Coupled with this increasing demand for wood and wood
products, there has been a shift in the emphasis from utilization of the often complex natural
forests to plantation of species relatively easy to manage and capable of producing large
quantities of wood per unit area (Wilan, 1973).
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
545 www.jiarm.com
With just 2.5 per cent land area of the earth, India has to support nearly 15 per cent of
the world's human population and equally large but mostly unproductive live stock. Therefore
forests in the country due to under intense biotic pressure leading to degradation of genetic
resources. Nearly 35 m ha of forest area comprised of degraded open forest with less than 40
per cent crown cover density. The forests have very low growing stock at 74 m3 ha-1
compared to the global average of 130 m3 ha-1. Similarly the mean annual increment also
very low at less than 1 m3 ha-1 yr-1 compared to the world average of over 2.1 m3 ha-1 yr-1
(Piare Lal, 2005). The low forest cover coupled with poor productivity has ushered in a total
mismatch between demand and supply (Parthiban and Govinda Rao, 2008).
The supply of industrial wood raw material from forest area has been dwindling after
the enunciation of 1988 forest policy which guided the wood based industries in the country
to raise their own raw material without depending on forest department supplies (Anon, 1988).
In India, there are about 594 pulp and paper industries with 34 in the large scale sector
and 560 in the medium and small scale sector (Srivastava, 2005). The pulp and paper industry
is segmented as wood, agro and waste paper based with the former accounting for 43 per
cent, agro based 28 per cent and waste paper based 29 per cent, of the total installed capacity.
The demand for industrial wood raw material is also on the ascendancy due to expansion of
various paper mills. Considering the widening gap between demand and supply, almost all
industries in the country are in the process of establishment of industrial wood plantation
(Lal, 2000). However, the low productivity of industrial wood plantations due to non
availability of site specific and genetically improved planting stock is the major concern
faced by wood based industries. Hence, there is a need to identify and screen superior clone
for pulpwood which has the potential for high pulp recovery coupled with high productivity.
Materials and Method
The materials used in the present study consisted of ten clones selected from the existing seed
source evaluation trial at Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam and one seed
source. From each species, a billet of each 1 m length and 50-60 cm girth were collected. The
billets were debarked and chipped separately and screened. The screened chips were used for
pulping experiments. Some chips were converted into dust for proximate chemical analysis.
Based on the initial screening study in the laboratory the wood samples were subjected to
analysis of physical and chemical properties. The pulping experiments were also carried out
to find out its suitability for papermaking.
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
546 www.jiarm.com
The physical characteristics such as bulk density, basic density and moisture content of wood
chips are estimated. For the Chemical properties analysis, the billets of individual tree species
were chipped in pilot chipper; air-dried and converted into wood meal in a laboratory Wiley
disintegration. The wood dust passing through 40 mesh but retained over 60 mesh was
subjected to analysis for moisture, ash, hot water soluble, one per cent NaOH soluble, AB
extractive, Acid insoluble lignin, pentosans, hollocellulose as per TAPPI methods (TAPPI,
1980). The strength properties such as pulping, identification of kappa number, pulp
brightness, paper sheets preparation, paper strength measurement, tensile strength, tearing
strength, bursting strength measurement, black liquor analysis were analyzed as per standard
method (TAPPI, 1980).
Result and Discussion
Physical properties of wood chips
The moisture contents of wood sample of all the clones were found to be ranged between
9.76 (EC MTP 47) and 10.90 (EU MTP 8). The bulk density (284 kg m-3) and basic density
(542 kg m-3) were found highest in clone EC MTP 48 and lowest in clone EC MTP 41 (Table
1). The wood density of Eucalyptus pulp wood is possibly one of the most influential factors
controlling the strength and several other physical characteristics of the paper sheet. It is
relatively simple and inexpensive property to determine, even in unsophisticated
environments. The bulk density exhibited wide variation and maximum density was recorded
by EC MTP 48. This variation among tested clones and seed source may be due to the
differences between early and late wood which could have created variation between and
within trees (Malan and Arbuthnot, 1995). The bulk density of the entire culm of bamboo
indicated the variation between nodes and internodes samples (Ahmad and Kamke, 2005).
Similarly significant difference was observed among Eucalyptus species in basic density
which ranged between 446 kg m-3 (EC MTP 41) and 542 kg m-3 (EC MTP 48). These results
are in consonance with the observation in Eucalyptus globulus (Santos et al., 2004);
Eucalyptus clones (Yu Chen, 2006) and also Eucalyptus species (Rockwood et al., 2008).
The wood density properties are of major importance for the production of quality pulp and
paper. The amount of wood needed to produce one tone of air dried pulp is calculated from
the density and pulp yield (Storebraten, 1990).
A wide variation in wood and fibre properties of different tree species were reported
(Niskanen, 1998). Persson (1975) found that differences in diameter growth have major
impact on basic density of wood. Basic density is again highly correlated with late wood
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
547 www.jiarm.com
content (Bergstedt and Olsen, 2000). Similarly the variability exhibited in most physical
properties studied among different Eucalyptus clones in the current study also thus attests the
results of earlier findings. But it is important to understand the exact relationship between
wood density and other fibre characteristics of the test clones that have an effect on pulp and
paper quality.
Chips classification results revealed that accept chips for cooking are around 82.8 per cent
and dust is around 0.5 per cent (Table 1). This is the accepted size for pulping. The heat
transfer and chemical penetration during pulping may be uniform in all cases. Pape (1999)
found higher basic density in Norway spruce trees stands thinned from above than that
thinned from below due to the lower density in dominant trees than in codominant and
suppressed trees. Johansson (1993) did not find such a difference in the basic density level
between tree classes. This might be probably due to the young material used as indicated by
Pape (1999). However, in the current study the basic density exhibited wider variation which
might be due to species or differences between early and late wood formation as reported by
Malan and Arbuthnot (1995).
Chemical properties of wood chips
The proximate chemical analysis give an idea of potentiality of raw material for paper
making. The chemical analysis in terms of ash content ranged between 0.32 (EC MTP 48)
and 0.71 (EU MTP 1) (Table 2). The chemical investigation carried out in wood pulp of
Acacia mangium recorded high ash content (Saepuloh, 1999). However, all the selected
clones in the current study exhibited lower ash content which thus lend a scope for utilization
as pulp wood.
The alcohol-benzene solubilities of wood constitute the waxes, fats and resinous matter. In
the current study, the extractives were in the range between 1.1 (EU MTP 1, EU MTP 2 and
ET MTP 29) and 1.4 (ET MTP 14, EC MTP 47 and EC MTP 48) and potential differences
were recorded among the clones selected. Similar variation in alcohol-benzene extractives
were observed among various clones of Eucalyptus tereticornis, wherein the extractives
ranged between 1.06 and 1.35 (Rao et al., 1999). The chemical investigation carried out in
Bambusa tulda (Bhola, 1976); Lagerstromia speciosa and Terminalia myriocarpa (Singh et
al., 1972) also indicated wood variation in the extractives. Among the chemical properties,
holocellulose is very important because it is a measure of total carbohydrate content of the
wood (Tappi, 2001). The holocellulose constituting cellulose and hemicellulose is the major
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
548 www.jiarm.com
portion of fibrous raw material. The holocellulose content in the study ranged between 71.6
(S.O) and 75.2 (EC MTP 48) and other Eucalyptus species recorded in between these. The
result indicated the superiority of EC MTP 48 as a source of raw material for paper industry (Table 2).
The content of pentosans ranged between 13.0 per cent (EC MTP 47) and 18.5 per cent (S.O)
and acid soluble lignin was found to be in the range of 23.0 per cent (EC MTP 47) to 25.7 per
cent (S.O) (Table 2). Such variation in the content of pentosans of Acacia mangium
(Saepuloh, 1999) was also evident which corroborate the results of current findings.
The overall chemical analysis revealed that the clone EC MTP 48 is most superior among
twenty seven clones and one seed source tested which could be used for commercial
deployment for clonal plantation establishment.
Strength properties of wood chips
Bleached strength properties at different freeness levels for each pulp were measured
and initial freeness for the pulp was 430 ± 50 ml CSF. The refining energy required to get
300 ml CSF was around 3500 revolutions in PFI mill which gave freeness around 300 ml CSF.
The strength properties viz., tensile index, burst index and tear index of bleached kraft pulps
indicated that the clones EC MTP 48 (80.0 Nm g-1, 5.0 K Pa m2 g-1, 8.2 m Nm2 g-1), EC
MTP 47 (78.0 Nm g-1, 4.4 K Pa m2 g-1, 8.0 m Nm2 g-1), EC MTP 53 (78.0 Nm g-1, 4.2 K
Pa m2 g-1, 7.8 m Nm2 g-1) and EC MTP 41 (78.0 Nm g-1, 4.7 K Pa m2 g-1, 8.0 m Nm2 g-1)
have recorded superior strength properties for pulp and paper followed by ET MTP 14 (77.0
Nm g-1, 4.6 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.6 m Nm2 g-1), EU MTP 1 (74.0 Nm g-1, 4.3 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.5 m
Nm2 g-1), S.O (72.0 Nm g-1, 4.5 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.8 m Nm2 g-1) (EC MTP 50 (71.0 Nm g-1,
4.1 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.9 m Nm2 g-1), EU MTP 8 (70.0 Nm g-1, 4.1 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.5 m Nm2 g-
1), ET MTP 29 (67.0 Nm g-1, 4.3 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.7 m Nm2 g-1) and EU MTP 2 (61.0 Nm g-
1, 3.4 K Pa m2 g-1, 7.7 m Nm2 g-1) (Table 10). Comparison between the pulps obtained
under identical conditions revealed that EU MTP 2 and ET MTP 29 are inferior to the rest of
the clones investigated (Table 3 & Table 4).
The strength properties of paper are directly associated with cellulose and interfibre bonding.
The clone EC MTP 48 recorded high holocellulose and low lignin content due to increased
pulp yield and is good for interfibre bonding and pulp strength. Similar variations among tree
species for various strength properties were also recorded between Eucalyptus tereticornis
and Eucalyptus grandis (Patil et al., 1997). Within the species, the strength properties varied
due to age but in the current study variation occurred among clones of same age which
indicated the variation might be due to clones. It was reported that improvement in burst and
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
549 www.jiarm.com
tensile index with decreasing freeness in Eucalyptus tereticornis (Patil et al., 1997). The best
strength properties viz. burst, tear, tensile was attained by pulps of 14-15 years age groups in
case of Eucalyptus. However, in the current study satisfactory levels of strength properties
was achieved even in five years of growth which indicated that the clones tested in the
current study could be harvested even in five years as against seven years of current practice
by the state forest department.
The comparison of pulping results for yield and strength properties of all the species revealed
that EC MTP 48 is most superior compared to Control (S.O) . Among the three species viz.,
Eucalyptus urophylla, Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Eucalyptus tereticornis, Eucalyptus
camaldulensis recorded higher strength properties compared to other two species. The
strength properties viz., tensile index, tear index, burst index and specific coefficient were
recorded superior values in EC MTP 48, EC MTP 47 and EC MTP 41. This might be due to
superior fibre characteristic that may be present in the species. This besides, the chemical
requirement to achieve 20 kappa number in this species is only 17 per cent with normal
chemical requirement and good bleaching response might also contributed for improved
strength properties.
Among these strength properties, tearing strength depends upon fibre length, width etc.
Hence, the maximum tearing strength, burst index and tear index in
EC MTP 48, EC MTP 47 and EC MTP 41 must be due to superior fibre characteristics.
Strength properties are best obtained with EC MTP 48, EC MTP 47 and
EC MTP 41 which might be due to higher freeness and optimized kappa number (<20)
recorded by this species. The wood and wood properties are very important not only for
production of paper but also the properties of paper (Storebraten, 1990). The pulp and paper
property are highly dependent on fibre morphology and sheet forming processes (Pavilainen,
1993; Seth et al., 1997). Wood with different properties give different pulp and paper
qualities (Kibblewhite, 1989). A systematic variation was observed between trees wherein
dominated tree had different property than the intermediate and suppressed ones (Duchesne et
al., 1997). However, in the current study, only dominated trees were selected which
expressed wide variability. This indicated the genetic differences among clones of different
Eucalyptus species. Such variation in wood properties due to various provenance of
Eucalyptus amplifolia was earlier reported (Rockwood et al., 2008) which lend support to the
findings of current investigation.
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
550 www.jiarm.com
The various wood properties significantly associate between and within them towards
producing various grades of pulp (Wanrosli et al., 2004). The interrelationship of screened
yield, tensile and tear indices with kappa number are also observed in Elaeis guineensis. The
study indicated that tensile index tends to decrease with increasing kappa number while the
tear index reaction is opposite (Wanrosli et al., 2004). Similar interrelationship between
tensile index, tear index with kappa number was evident in the current study for the various
clones investigated.
Considering all physical, chemical and strength properties, all the trees subjected for analysis
were found to be suitable as a source of pulpwood. However, considering the pulp yield and
kappa number coupled with strength properties, the superiority of the EC MTP 48, EC MTP
47 and EC MTP 41 as a source of pulpwood was evident and hence the above three clones
are recommended for clonal deployment towards establishment of industrial wood pulpwood
plantations.
However, the variation in physical, chemical and strength properties observed among the
clones of three Eucalyptus species suggest that further improvement could be made via
selection, breeding and further clonal deployment of outstanding individuals.
References
1. Ahmad, M. and F.A. Kamke. 2005. Analysis of Calcutta bamboo for structural composite materials: Physical and mechanical properties. Wood Science and Technology, 39(4): 448-459.
2. Anonymous. 1988. National Forest Policy, MoEF, New Delhi. 3. Bergstedt, A. and P.O. Olesen. 2000. Models for predicting dry matter content of Norway
spruce. Scand J. Forest Res., 15: 633-644. 4. Bhola, P.P. 1976. Pulping studies of hill Jati Bamboo (Bambusa tulda) from Cachar hills.
Indian Forester, 102(4): 242-246. 5. Duchesne, I., L. Wilhelmsson and K. Spangberg. 1997. Effects of in-forest sorting of Norway
spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on wood and fibre properties. Can. J. Forest Res., 27: 790-795.
6. Gauthier, H. 1991. Plantation wood in world trade. In: The Emergence of New Forest Potentials in the world, AFOCEL, Paris. pp. 9-19.
7. Johansson, K. 1993. Influence of initial spacing and tree class on the basic density of Picea abies. Scand J. Forest Res., 1993(8): 18-27.
8. Kibblewhite, R.P. 1989. New Zealand radiate pine market kraft pulp qualities. PAPRO New Zealand Technical Brochure.
9. Lal, P. 2000. National forest policy and raw material supplies for wood based industries in India. Indian Forester, 126(4): 351-365.
10. Malan, F.S. and A.L. Arbuthnot. 1995. The Inter-relationships between density and fiber properties of South Africa grown Eucalyptus grandis.
11. Niskanen, K. 1998. Paper physics. ISBN 952-5216-16-0. Fapet Oy, Helsinki. 12. Pape, R. 1999. Effects of thinning on wood properties of Norway spruce on highly productive
sites. Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. p. 90. 13. Parthiban, K.T. and M. Govinda Rao. 2008. Pulpwood based industrial agroforestry in Tamil
Nadu – A case study. Indian Forester, 134(2): 155-163.
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
551 www.jiarm.com
14. Patil, J.V., R.B. Deshmukh, N.D. Jambhale, S.C. Patil and N.T. Kunjir. 1997. Correlation and path analysis in Eucalyptus. Indian J. For., 22(2): 132-135.
15. Pavilainen, L. 1993. Conformability, flexibility and collapsibility of Sulphate wood fibers. Paperi Puu, 75(9-10): 689-703.
16. Persson, A. 1975. Wood and pulp of Norway spruce and Scots pine at various spacings. Department of Forest Yield Research, Research Notes 37, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden. p. 145.
17. Piare Lal. 2005. Integrated development of agroforestry plantations and wood based industries. In: Agroforestry in 21st century (Eds. K. Chauhan, S.S. Gill, S.C. Sharma and Rajni Chauhan). Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur. pp. 296-303
18. Rao, R.V., V. Kothiyal, P. Sreevani, S. Shashikala, S. Naithani and S.V. Singh. 1999. Yield and strength properties of pulp of some clones of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Indian Forester, 125(11): 1145-1151.
19. Rockwood , L., A.W. Ruide, A. Sally, J.Y. Zhu and J.E. Wiandy. 2008. Energy product options for Eucalyptus species grown as short rotation woody crops. Intl. J. Mol. Sci., 9: 1361-1378.
20. Saepuloh, G.P.D. 1999. Chemical component analysis on Mangium wood at its several age groups from Riau. Bulletin Penelitian Hasil-Hutan, 17(3): 140-148.
21. Santos, A., A. Ofelia and R.Simoes. 2004. Wood and pulp properties of two Eucalyptus globulus wood samples. In: N. Borralho et al. Eucalyptus in a Changing World Proceeding of IUFRO Conference, Aveiro. 11-15th October.
22. Seth, R.S., H.F. Jang, B.K. Chan and C.B. Wu. 1997. Transverse dimensions of wood pulp fibres and their implications for end use. The fundamentals of papermaking materials. 11th Fundamental Research Symposium, Cambridge, Vol. I, Pira International, Surrey, UK. pp. 473-503.
23. Singh, S.P., P.R. Handa, Harjit Singh, Kishan Chand, M.L. Gupta, G.C. Agarwal, Man Mohan Singh and S.R.D. Guha. 1972. Pulping studies of Lagerstromia species and Terminalia myriacarpa. Indian Forester, 98(4): 244-251.
24. Srivastava, M.B. 2005. Timber industries and non-timber forest products. CBS Publication, New Delhi. p. 518.
25. Storebraten, S. 1990. Sulfatfabrikken – virkesforsyningens soppelplass Foredrag i PTF, Masseteknisk gruppe, 9 Oktober, Oslo, Norway. p. 25.
26. Tappi. 1980. Standard and suggested methods. Technical association of pulp and paper industry, New York. pp. 200-265.
27. Tappi. 2001. Laboratory manual on testing procedures. Published by the Director, Central Pulp and Paper Research Institute, Saharanpur (U.P.). TM 1-A9.
28. Wanrosli, W.D., L.K. Zainuddin and L.K. Lee. 2004. Influence of pulping variables on the properties of Elaeis guinensis soda pulp as evaluated by response surface methodology. Wood Science and Technology, 38(3): 191-205.
29. Wilan, R.L. 1973. Forestry: Improving the use of Genetic Resources. Span, 16(5): 119-121. 30. Yu Chen. 2006. Variation of wood density, pulp yield other wood properties for four
Eucalyptus clones in Stora Enso Guangxi (China) plantation. M.Sc. Thesis, Lulea University of Technology. Sweden.
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
552 www.jiarm.com
40
50
60
70
80
90
200300400500600
FREENESS - ML CSF
TE
NSI
LE
IN
DE
X
Fig. 1. Strength properties of EC MTP 48 bleached pulp at different freeness levels TENSILE INDEX TEAR INDEX
BURST INDEX REFINING ENERGY
UR at 450 ml At 300ml CSF Tensile Index Nm/g 54.0 80.0 Tear Index mN.m2/g 4.0 8.2 Burst Index kPa.m2/g 3.1 5.0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
200300400500600
FREENESS - MLCSF
TE
AR
IN
DE
X2
3
4
5
6
7
200300400500600
FREENESS - MLCSF
BU
RST
IN
DE
X
200
300
400
500
600
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
PFI REVOLUTIONS
FR
EE
NE
SS - M
LC
SF
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
553 www.jiarm.com
Table 1. Physical characteristics of different Eucalyptus clones
S. No.
Clones Moisture content
(%)
Bulk density (OD basis)
(kg m-3)
Basic density (OD basis)
(kg m-3)
Chips classification (%)
+ 45 mm + 8 mm
(over thick)+7 mm
(accept ) + 3 mm
(pin chips) -3 mm (dust)
1 EU MTP 1 10.49 260 499 Nil 6.1 80.1 13.2 0.6
2 EU MTP 2 10.76 270 510 Nil 5.9 78.5 14.8 0.8
3 EU MTP 8 10.90 230 455 Nil 5.7 80.4 13.5 0.4
4 ET MTP 14 10.61 249 469 Nil 6.2 77.8 15.4 0.6
5 ET MTP 29 10.47 236 452 Nil 5.2 80.9 13.5 0.4
6 EC MTP 41 10.22 234 446 Nil 6.5 82.6 10.1 0.8
7 EC MTP 47 9.76 270 510 Nil 4.4 82.8 12.4 0.4
8 EC MTP 48 9.98 284 542 Nil 6.5 81.8 11.3 0.4
9 ECMTP 50 10.97 245 540 Nil 7.2 79.9 12.1 0.8
10 EC MTP 53 10.49 240 540 Nil 5.8 81.5 12.3 0.4
11 S.O (Control) 10.29 220 455 Nil 8.3 78.6 12.8 0.3
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
554 www.jiarm.com
Table 2. Proximate chemical composition of different Eucalyptus clones
Sl. No.
Clones Ash
content (%)
Solubility in Alcohol benzene
extractive (%)
Acid insoluble
lignin (%)
Pentosans (ash
corrected ) (%)
Holocellulose (%)
Hot water (%)
1 % NaOH
(%) 1 EU MTP 1 0.54 3.0 12.9 1.1 24.3 13.4 73.1
2 EU MTP 2 0.45 2.9 12.2 1.1 24.9 13.7 73.1
3 EU MTP 8 0.53 2.8 12.5 1.2 24.6 13.2 73.3
4 ET MTP 14 0.43 2.8 12.8 1.4 24.2 13.8 73.7
5 ET MTP 29 0.34 2.7 14.3 1.1 24.3 13.9 73.4
6 EC MTP 41 0.43 2.9 13.5 1.2 24.5 13.3 74.6
7 EC MTP 47 0.46 3.4 12.2 1.4 23.0 13.0 74.8
8 EC MTP 48 0.32 2.7 12.9 1.4 23.2 14.4 75.2
9 EC MTP 50 0.53 3.7 13.8 1.3 24.4 14.8 73.2
10 EC MTP 53 0.48 2.7 12.7 1.3 24.3 14.6 73.2
11 S.O (Control) 0.38 3.6 14.0 1.2 25.7 18.5 71.6
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
555 www.jiarm.com
Table 3. Bleached pulp properties of different Eucalyptus clones
Sl. No. Clones
Init
ial F
reen
ess
(ML
CSF
)
Bul
k (g
cm
-3)
Unrefined pulp Optical properties
Strength properties of 300 ml CSF
Bri
ghtn
ess
(% I
SO
)
Opa
city
(%
)
Scat
teri
ng
coef
fici
ent (
m2
kg-1
)
Yel
low
ness
(%
)
Ten
sile
inde
x (N
m g
-1)
Tea
r in
dex
(m N
m2 g-1
)
Bur
st in
dex
(K P
a m
2 g-1
)
1 EU MTP 1 Unrefined Refined pulp
470 300
1.76
85.4
84.2
54.0
7.6
41.0 74.0
4.3 7.5
2.6 4.3
2 EU MTP 2 Unrefined Refined pulp
480 300
1.77
85.6
84.0
51.5
8.0
36.8 61.0
5.6 7.7
2.0 3.4
3 EU MTP 8 Unrefined Refined pulp
470 300
1.92
85.6
83.0
52.2
8.5
41.0 70.0
4.3 7.5
2.5 4.1
4 ET MTP 14 Unrefined Refined pulp
430 300
1.54
85.0
83.4
47.6
8.7
52.0 77.0
4.4 7.6
3.3 4.6
5 ET MTP 29 Unrefined Refined pulp
430 300
1.86
85.8
84.6
53.7
7.7
35.0 67.0
3.8 7.7
1.9 4.3
6 EC MTP 41 Unrefined Refined pulp
430 300
1.80
85.6
84.8
53.5
7.6
41.2 78.0
4.3 8.0
2.4 4.7
7 EC MTP 47 Unrefined Refined pulp
480 300
1.77
85.6
84.0
51.5
8.0
50.0 78.0
4.1 8.0
2.7 4.4
8 EC MTP 48 Unrefined Refined pulp
450 300
1.58
85.3
83.0
47.3
8.7
54.0 80.0
4.0 8.2
3.1 5.0
9 EC MTP 50 Unrefined Refined pulp
480 300
1.87
85.3
84.0
55.2
8.2
42.0 71.0
4.1 7.9
2.5 4.1
10 EC MTP 53 Unrefined Refined pulp
450 300
1.81
85.0
84.7
55.2
7.6
45.0 78.0
3.8 7.8
2.2 4.2
11 S.O (Control) Unrefined Refined pulp
460 300
1.91
85.3
84.0
55.2
8.2
40.0 72.0
3.9 7.8
2.1 4.5
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC RESEARCH FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY Impact Factor 1.393, ISSN: 2320-5083, Volume 1, Issue 12, January 2014
556 www.jiarm.com
Table 4. Comparison of different Eucalyptus clones with respect yield and strength
Species Chemical
charge for 20 kappa
Unbleached pulp yield
(%)
Kappa Number
Strength properties at 300 ml CSF
Tear index (m Nm2 g-1)
Tensile index (Nm g-1)
Burst index (K Pa m2 g-1)
EU MTP 1 17 45.06 20.56 7.5 74.0 4.3
EU MTP 2 17 46.84 20.30 7.7 61.0 3.4
EU MTP 8 17 44.65 20.26 7.5 70.0 4.1
ET MTP 14 17 44.28 20.38 7.6 77.0 4.6
ET MTP 29 17 46.51 20.80 7.7 67.0 4.3
EC MTP 41 17 47.35 20.30 8.0 78.0 4.7
EC MTP 47 17 47.38 20.48 8.0 78.0 4.4
EC MTP 48 17 48.38 19.30 8.2 80.0 5.0
EC MTP 50 17 47.02 20.64 7.9 71.0 4.1
EC MTP 53 17 46.91 20.90 7.8 78.0 4.2
S.O (Control) 17 44.00 24.30 7.8 72.0 4.5