13
U D F R , U D k , k , , & & T 16‘“ U x O U G F N N F N N C j T , , x , k WR D , U 253 FFDVT N B C BR F NG FOR T: OB CT NG TO FR VO OU TGTON R : T G C # 10- R-16—46 T T BR 16, 2017

It is U.S. - · PDF fileIt is uptothepresiding Minnesota ProbateJudge EidetofilethisAffidavitSEAL; myprofessional recommendationis to notallowthegeneral publicaccesstothisAffidavit

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

. It is up to the presiding Minnesota Probate Judge Eide to file this Affidavit SEAL; my professional

recommendation is to not allow the general public access to this Affidavit; due to the fact the U.S.

Department of Education does not teach publicly about the Free—Slave Rights, U.S. Department of

Education only teach publicly the Emancipation Proclamation which freed the slave house workers, theslave field workers, the runaway slaves, & the plantation slave traitors with terms & conditions. Therewere two stages of freedom before the 16‘“ U.S. President’s Executive Order which stopped the

enslavement of people of African decedent in the bounties of the United States of America. Graham has

read and study aboard under the First Native National Educational System as well as independentreading at the First Native National Library of Congress on the subject of the African Slave Trade. So, dueto phobia, to anxiety, to the miseducation of the general public and the talk of WAR this Affidavit should

be filed SEALED. Please, contact an U.S. Military official or a government official before you release this

Affidavit to the general public.

253sAFFIDAVIT IN BASIC BRIEFING

FORMAT: OBJECTING TOFRIVOLOUS LITIGATION

Pro Se Respondent: Shawnetta T. Graham Probate Case# 10-PR-16—46

TSEPTEMBER 16, 2017

In the State of Minnesota in the County Carver District Court

First Judicial District Probate Division

Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent

)

In the matter of the Estate of: )

) Honorable Judge Kevin W. Eide

) Case type: Special Administration

) District Court Case#: 10-PR-16-46

Affidavit

In Basic Briefing Format

Table of Contents

Authority & Questions for Review .............................................Page # 2 to 4

. Introduction .............................................................................. Page #4 & 6

Foreign Court Systems Topics ........................................................... Page #6

Blood Line ................................................................................. Page#6 to 7

Appeal Process .......................................................................... Page #7 to 8

Recommendation for the Estate ..................................................... Page # 8

Security Issues .................................................................................. Page # 9

Conclusion: Part A & Part B ................................................... Page # 9 to 11

Sworn Declaration, Service, & Notary Public ........................ Page # 11 to 12

Appendix ............................................. Exhibit 1 to Exhibit 5 Page # 13 t018

In the State of Minnesota in the County Carver District Court

First Judicial District Probate Division

Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent

)

In the matter of the Estate of: )

) Honorable Judge Kevin W. Eide

) Case type: Special Administration

) District Court Case#: 10-PR-16-46

Affidavit

In Basic Briefing FormatI. Authority

Part A

Affidavit: An affidavit (/afl'demt/ A-fe-DAY-vet) is a written sworn statement of fact

voluntarily made by an affiant or deponent under an oath or affirmation administered bya person authorized to do so by law.

Communitv Pronertv with Right of Survivorship: it is not a probate issue...

When Husband dies, Wife Will take husbands interest, and Wife will own the

entire house.

Direct Application to the United States Supreme Court: Supreme Court

Rule 22:

Amendment 1: ...freedom to petition the government for a redress grievances.

Amendment 6‘: Right to a fair trial in criminal prosecutions ...this is a probate

court. This is a civil issues Amendment 7; Right in civil cases. A value exceed

twenty dollars. (This is a large Estate) you have the right of a trial by jury

...according to the rule of common law. Amendment 14: ...nor shall any state

deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny

any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws...

United States Constitution: Amendment V: Due Process of the law

Amendment V- Trial and Punishment. Compensation for Taking§

No person shall be held t0 answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unlesson a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the landor naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public

danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense t0 be twice put in

ieopardv of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witnessagainst himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of

law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, Without just compensation.

(This is a Minnesota Probate Case)

Minnesota General Rules ofPractice for District Court: Title VProbate Rule 411 or

any other Minnesota District Probate Authority.

Valid Will: Minnesota Statues 524

Minnesota Statues 524.2—6'02: Will May Pass: property & After-ACQUIREDProperty

Court Appointed Special Administration: A Special Administrator is a temporary

fiduciary appointed by the probate court in many states to marshal and preserve

the assets when a delay is foreseen in appointing a permanent fiduciary.

Elite Free Slave Act before the “Nat Turner Rebel against his Slave Plantation

Master & before the Emancipation Proclamation & The Elite Free Slave Act.

which included a non- master & non- slave agreement which was lobby andapproved bv U.S. Legislation. This ACT was amended after Nat Turner Lead

a Rebellion against his Master Joseph Travis which started on August 21, 1831. It

was amended to include the Plantation Master’s recognized plantation slave

children. (Free Slave Acts) (See: United States: Library of Congress: Division of

Law)

PART (B) Questions tor Review

Should Shawnetta T. Graham, a Pro-Se Respondent in Probate Case # 10-PR-

16-46; past and future filing be consider a frivolous litigation pursuant to

Rule 9 (j the Minnesota Rules of General Practice for the District Court ,

and should all discussion about fines and sanction be dropped?

Can Shawnetta T. Graham a Pro-Se Respondent in Probate Case# 10-PR-

16-46, continue to file objections and request compensation to this Minnesota

Probate Case using her United States Constitutional Rights, North America Native

Tribal Indian/Native Tribal Rights, any Federal Law Rights any Minnesota State

Probate Laws or any National Laws or International Laws?

Should the Minnesota Probate Court transfer this case to a count system that is

prepared or have the knowledge of the Free Slave Laws which is part of U.S.

Government Legislation which were establish to protect the Free Slaves?

Should the presiding Minnesota Probate Judge Eide reconsider his orders which

has denied Pro-Se Respondent “STG” her fundamental constitutional rights under

Minnesota Wills & Trust Estate Laws?

Did the presiding Minnesota Judge Probate Judge Eide use Immigration Laws,

Civil Rights Laws, and Citizenship Laws in his ruling on the heirship in the Matter

of the Estate of: Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent?

Is the presiding Probate Judge Eide out his legal jurisdiction in ruling on this

Estate case# 10-PR-16-46?

Should the presiding Minnesota Probate Judge Eide rule for heirship in the Matter

of the Estate of: Prince Rogers Nelson, Decedent, under Minnesota Wills and

Trust Laws like or similar to the case: In The Matter of the Estate of: Elvis

Presley, Decedent, where Lisa Marie Presley (daughter) was the sole heir as

describe by Elvis’s Last Will and Testament or Trust guidelines?

II. Introduction

A Minnesota Native American Women, who was a cleaning lady, inherit some land

from her Native father; one day this Minnesota Native American Women met the

half—sister of the Late Prince Rogers Nelson. Currently, I am 49 years old and I

worked full time and after work I use my personal time to compose legal documents

for this probate case. I am schedule to retire from full time employment in the year

2019. Plus, I hold an Illinois Insurance Professional License for all insurance

disciplines. (See: Exhibit 1- flyer for sales event) I will need to renew my multi-

4

discipline Illinois Insurance License by June 6, 2019; also, I am Illinois Notary

Public that is still training. My Notary training needs to be completed by April 0t

2m Ms. Graham is currently certify as an Illinois Judge of Election for the City of

Aurora. This Judge of Election needs to be renewed every two years. Ms. Graham is

a retired in home Law Clerk for United States Judges (Masonic members only). If a

Judge was behind on judicial work and had to bring their work home or if a Judge

needed his in home law library catalog and organized according to American Library

Association, I was hired.

I have been “Pro-Se” in many cases in the State of Illinois Court System and the

Illinois District Federal Court System. As long as I understand a case; I can legally'I

brief a case as well as a practicing license attorney. My knowledge of law cani

become international & tribal. I started off as an in-home law clerk to the late

Supreme Court Chief Justice Williams Rehnquist. United States Supreme Court

Justice Anthony Kennedy is my living reference on legal brief writing. I am a Emfilayg in the North America. (See: Short Bio in Exhibit 1 & See Exhibit 2 for letter

of law credibility) It is a Violation of my human rights to take something fi‘om me

under the Free Slave ACT. If I have earned and have worked hard for anything it

is outline under the Free Slave Act that such a denial of payment or property will

be a ground for WAR; this was negotiated by the Elite Slave Group. (See: The

Elite Free Slave Act: United States Library Congress: Division 0f Law) The Elite

Slave Group were not filed workers for 400 years, house workers for 400 years, nor

label as run-a-way slaves, or not a plantation traitors. The Elite Slave Group were

non-servants and did not accept the Masters’ plantation religion. The Elite Slave

was the stronger Slaves. The United States of America: 16th President FREED the

weaker or weakest Slaves in the mid-1800 ERA. (See: the original written version of

the Emancipation Proclamation 1863 and all related legal topics: U.S. Library of

Congress: Division of Law)

III. Foreiflz Court Svstems Topics

I have spoken at the following court system: World Court and International Court.

Plus, I have spoken at the United Nation on topic as the following:WW3W My blood-line has experiences victimization by other human beings. In

the State of Arkansas there was a commercial agent use to decrease our population

due to loose diamonds discovery in the Arkansas National Park Area. I could speak

about crimes and robberies of my blood fiom South Afi'ica to England and to the

robbery of King Tut Tomb in modern Egypt. However, we are addressing the Late

Prince Rogers Nelson Estate at this moment. I cannot be silent! I deserve my fair

share.

IV. Blood Line

I am a direct decedent of “Mother Theresa” and “Jesus Christ” and other great

leaders.(See: Exhibit-l Short Newspaper BIO) .I object to any sanction brought

against me for trying to take a legal stand against a violation of my constitutional

rights as the half—sister/like spouses to the Late Prince Roger Nelson. I had a

double love for the Late Prince, and he ADORE me. We went through Estate

Planning, and taking me through an unnecessary legal remedy is causing hardship

and due-stress. I have a blood line worldwide, and they must have food and shelter.

So, I must fight this case to the end. Once an individual pays a court tee and any

court administration tees they are members of the court case. I did notify

Minnesota Presiding Judge Kevin W. Eide about my special appellant procedures.

(See: Court Docket: 10-PR-16-46)

V. Appeal Process

I have contacted the following: United States President Donald J. Trump.

Unites States Supreme Court Justice Anthonv Kennedy. and United State

Supreme Court John G. Roberts Jr. My next step will be the World Court by

Januafl 2018 or sooner. I cannot sit silent and let other unjust issues in this

Minnesota Probate Court case go without my objections being filed and heard. It is

an United States Constitutional Rights to have a fair trial and due process of the

law. Anything in the lower court that has been brought up can be appeal. Appeal

court is not for new issue, the Gaplin Property 5mm be soch and I should

m part 0f the Probate Court Special Estate Administration Team. If one might

have an insurable interest then one might have a strong stake in this Minnesota

Probate Case. When reviewing the answer to the direct application to United States

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy the Clerk stated the following: ....this

court extends only to the consideration of cases or controversies properly brought

before it from lower courts in accordance with federal law...I need to be reconsider

(See: Exhibit 3 a copy of direct application answer dated August 15, 2017) I

thought Justice Kennedy’s remarks were delivered t0 Probate Judge Kevin W. Eide;

and such a letter gave me the legal right to continue to answer to issue Which will

affect my appeal to the World Court and to the United Nation.

VI. Recommendation to generate more cash to decease Estate’s debt ratio

This holiday season; I was viewing some 2018 Calendars at the Guitar Center, and

Elvis, Michael Jackson, & The Beetles had an 18 month calendar. (Estimated total

picture per calendar is 19) There was not any Late Prince or the Late Artist ERA

Calendars for sell at the Guitar Center in Aurora, Illinois. The late Prince took

photo like bathing daily; if the estate needs to generate more cash due to debt and

the Paisley Park gift shop is not generating enough money; then there are other

means to generate money. A 18 month Calendar for Prince should run about $15 to

$20 in the United States. You do not need to run and start selling property. There is

a vault of unpublished music that my children Who are musically talented and they

could help the estate by producing and recording, & re-mixing music scores Which

could generate more cash to help paid off any estate debt.

I have a 2018 Photo Calendar. (See: Exhibit 5: Illinois Legal Shield Attorney

stated I was not doing anything wrong) (My 2018 photo calendar was

forward to copyright.gov) Pro-Se Respondent Graham is capable of making

decision and administrating the Late Prince Estate with or without an Estate Legal

Team.

VII. Security Issues

Far as security increases; my personal security is out 24/7 land and air. If I have

to call on foreign troops; then active war-time pay Will have to be paid. That is an

unnecessary military expense. I object to any fines or sanction against the ‘Tro—Se

Respondent Shawnetta T. Graham” (STG). (See: Exhibit 2 for letters of law

credibility)

VIII. Conclusion (Part A: Legal View)

There are not any good legal reasons for Pro-Se Respondent: Shawnetta T. Graham to

appeal this Probate Case using the normal United States appellant procedure or the use of

any American Attorney. The United States Courts System apply three standards of

review namely, de novo review, arbitrary and capricious standard and clearly erroneous

standard. In the case of De novo standard of review, the appeals court looks at the case

anew, as if the earlier trial had never occurred and the case is effectively re-tried in the

appellate forum. The “arbitrary and capricious” or ‘abuse of discretion” standard is

applied when reviewing the decision of an administrative agency and the appellate court

will only overturn an agency decision if it was arbitrary and capricious, 0r if it exceeds

the agency's lawfiJl authority. When an appellate court applies the “clearly erroneous

standard,” it will only overturn the lower decision if it contains plain errors 0f fact 0r law.

VIII. Conclusion (Part B: Personal-Views)

This Probate Case # 10-PR-16-46 if heard should be presented to World Court and to the

United Nation, I am trying t0 finance and d0 work for humanity of people of color who

9

are enslave under a religion doctrine that accepts that teaching of enslavement 0f the

individual who were guilty in

The Case qgainst& for Christ. My South African Blood line are in a stage of being

FREED from a religion that accepts the enslavement of people of color. After the 16th

President Executive Order passed which prevented African took for slaves entering into

the bounties 0f the United States; there were a few cargoes of African housed at the Port

of Spain. (See: The ending of 1997 Amistad) These Cargoes of Afn’cans were moved to

another region or territory. This geographical area is a non-region or territory of the

North America. (STG purchase the intake records ofthe Port 0fSpain) Under The

Free-Slaves Act, a free slave is allow to work and receive payment for their work, and

whatever belongs t0 the FREE SLAVE legally is there and it is a violation to denial or

take something from a FREE-SLAVE if they have earn it; these terms and conditions

were establish due to the fact a FREE-SLAVE was allow to purchase their family. (See:

Original Version of the Movie Roots—-- Chicken—George Character, screen play based on

the late Alexis Haley Book: Roots) Any fines and/or sanction will gut Pro-Se

Respondent Shawnetta T. Graham in the red economically & financially. I cannot be

silent and watch my share of the ESTATE vanish. I worked hard to musically develop

and care for the Late Prince Rogers Nelson. The Late Prince publish music and

unpublished music can be passed down t0 the children in my blood line.

Finally, this Minnesota Probate Case should be compared and contrast t0 following case:

In the Matter 0fthe Estate 0fElvis Presley where his daughter, Lisa Marie, was the sole

10

heir in his Last Will Testament & Trust. Graceland generate money and currently Paisley

Park is generating money. The late Elvis was loved by all nationality in the Rock & Roll

E&and the late Prince Rogers Nelson was loved by all nationality as a Rocker. The

difference is that Late Elvis and Lisa Marie are 0f white skinned and Late Prince and

Shawnetta are of color skin With Native Roots. This is why it is a World Court and

United National issues. Graceland as I am aware of did not have any oil, any goal, any

silver, nor any precious stone 0r any gems; just like Paisley Park. The American

Minnesota Judicial System appears not to be fair in this Minnesota Probate rulings to all

nationality, but the Minnesota Probate Judicial System will enforce fines and sanction on

an individual who is taking a correct legal stand without an attorney. You should favor

this Pro-Se Resgondent.

IX. Sworn Declaration. Service. & Notarv Public

This is an Affidavit that affirms that Pro-Se Respondent Shawnetta T. Graham

is genuine about her legal stand in this Minnesota Probate Case: # 10-P -16'-46‘,

and Shawnetta T. Graham (STG) is not trying to harass any members of this

case or any representatives of this case. Shawnetta T.Graham affirms that she is

demonstrating that she should be including as a heir to the Estate of the Late

Prince Rogers Nelson. Everything in this Affidavit is true and correct to the best of

Graham (STG) knowledge and if any error are present in this Affidavit it should be

consider a harmless error. (See: Black Law Dictionary) This Affidavit was mailed to

the Caver County Judicial Center/Clerk Office on September 16, 2017 before the

hour of 8:00 p.m. using United State Postal Service Priority Mail. This Affidavit

11

was sign in fi'ont of an Illinois Notary Public and the Affiant Shawnetta T.

Graham presented a valid Illinois Driver’s License. Under oath in front 0f the

Notary Public & the Affiant (“STG”) stated that everything in this Affidavit is true

and correct. This Afiidavit was composed by Shawnetta T. Graham in the State of

Illinois in the County of Kane. On December 18 2016 before the hours of 9 p.m.

This Affiant (“STG”) electronically sent a notice of delivery to the following listed

attorney: Mark Greiner at mgreineflfredlawcom & Jeanette Bazis at

[email protected]. (They were scanned Exhibit 4). There was not any other

party members to this case forward this Affidavit by United States Postal mail from

Affiant (STG) due to security issues. (See: Exhibit 4; return mail incidents :)

Afliant Signature:Mymu Date: AZ “/Qr/ Z

Shawnetta T. Graham, 77 South Stolp Ave, Apt. #209, Aurora, Illinois 60506-5191, E-mail: [email protected]

LAURA S JAMESg; OFFICIAL SEAL

7 Notary Public. State of Illinois

My Commission ExpiresMarch 06. 2021

Notary Pubic Signature: WQ @Q'M

Notary Seal:

12