Upload
adikamrahimli
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
1/20
ITS COMMUNICATION
NETWORK
CE 8140Fall 2013
1
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
2/20
Technical Characteristic of Studied
Wireless Technologies
2
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
3/20
Key Characteristics
Specif icat ion
Each technology discussed is derived from an Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard.
Standards-based solutions allow for custom-off-the-shelf(COTS) equipment to be used.
Licensed
Frequency that is used during transmission can be either
licensed, by the Federal Communications Commission(FCC), or unlicensed.
It is important to weigh the cost of obtaining licenses for
licensed bands with the potential interference faced if
using unlicensed frequencies.
3
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
4/20
Key Characteristics
Frequency
Wireless technologies transmit their data through a range of
frequencies specified by the FCC.
Frequency band utilized by the wireless technology plays a
major role in determining the range and penetration of thewireless signal
Range
Range usually given is the maximum obtainable range for the
wireless technology; however, that range is not necessarily theobtainable range at the maximum link rate.
Link Rate
Each wireless technology is capable of transmitting a certain
amount of information in bits per second--known as link rate.
4
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
5/20
Key Characteristics
Throughput
Throughput is the actual amount of user-generated data
that can be transmitted per second.
Line-of-sigh t (LOS) Requ irementsA clear LOS between two communicating radios
enhances the signal strength and, thus, the achievable
link rate and throughput.
Range vs . Throughput
5
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
6/20
Communication Architecture
Infrastructure
Mesh
6
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
7/20
Mesh vs. Infrastructure
In terms of cost, a mesh solution will be superior to an
infrastructure deployment; simply because the number of
fiber optic Internet connections required in a mesh
deployment is considerably lower.
In terms of reliability, the infrastructure model is expected
to perform better because each of the node clusters has
its own connection and there is no forwarded traffic.
7
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
8/20
Data transmission within one mesh cluster
8
Data transmission within infrastructure cluster
Fiber Internet Connection
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
9/20
MJPEG video bandwidth requirements
Cisco 1310 with an estimated range of 865 feet at 54
Mbps and a range of 3465 feet at 11 Mbps when usingan omni-directional antenna.
WiMAX - an M/A-Com base station is expected to
produce a line-of-sight range of approximately 2.5
miles with an omni-directional antenna.
9
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
10/20
Flowchart for network design
10
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
11/20
ITS Equipment Layout- Greenville
Located on I-385, north of
I-85, with a satellite camera
located on I-85
approximately 2.5 miles
north of the I-385/I-85
intersection.
14 cameras to be
connected wirelessly
11
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
12/20
CAMERA LOCATIONS
12
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
13/20
Assumptions
The router/radio assumed will be the Cisco 1310, with an
estimated range of 865 feet at 54 Mbps and a range of
3,465 feet at 11 Mbps
1 Cameras (~1.7 Mbps) 1 RADAR devices (~0.6 Mbps)
Dynamic messaging signs require negligible bandwidth
13
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
14/20
Wi-Fi infrastructure network
14
Divides the 14 traffic
surveillance cameras into six
clusters:
Three groups of three,
Two groups of two, and
One group of one
Total of six fiber-optic
Internet connections required
Fourteen Cisco 1310 radio
Camera 97 98 99
97 0 1911 4398
98 1911 0 2495
99 4398 2495 0
99
98
97
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
15/20
Wi-Fi Mesh Network Divides the fourteen traffic
surveillance cameras into
two mesh clusters
A group of six and
a group of eight.
A high-gain directional
antenna is connected to the
widely separated node
Total of two fiber-opticInternet connections
required, and fourteen
Cisco 1310 access points
15
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
16/20
Cost analysis
16
17
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
17/20
Project instructions
Design infrastructure network and mesh networkcommunication system for the site locations assigned to yourgroup using Wi-Fi.
Perform a performance-cost analysis for your proposedsystems.
Consult the paper on wireless communication alternatives as aguide.
The hybrid system should consist of a combination of wireless andwired connections.
Utilize current location of devices and a TMC within 5 miles.
Provide reference/explanation for the performance and costassumptions in your analysis.
Consider 1000 ft extra fiber per mile for maintenance of the fiber opticconnection.
17
18
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
18/20
Deliverables
A high level drawing showing the communication
hubs and wireless/wireline connectivity for your
proposed system (11x17 scaled drawing ).
Data transmission diagram for all clusters in meshnetwork.
Project report:
Explanation of the methodology adopted, assumptions made and
performance-cost analysis . Design of fiber optic cable for thebnearest fiber drop location to a
traffic management center (use the GDOT document).
18
19
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
19/20
Hints
Do you need overhead fiber or underground? Can you go
over head when you are crossing the road?
Fiber drops are for overhead connections.
What are use of the slack loops or pull boxes? Do youneed them for your system?
Link to GDOT document (posted in Blackboard):
http://www.dot.ga.gov/travelingingeorgia/trafficcontrol/Doc
uments/TrafficSignals/TrafficSignalDesignGuidelines.pdf
19
20
8/10/2019 ITS Communication Design4_RC
20/20
Data transmission within one mesh cluster
20