38
J. It , lA-Oi 6C,-J( t- -i. ^*- S" C-*- /V*? V v- MlY.5 42A12SE8366 2.8103 JAMIESON 010 REPORT ON OVERBURDEN DRILLING AND GEOCHEMICAL RESULTS JA-JE PROJECT JAMIESON TOWNSHIP PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION ONTARIO BY DRI7PIELD CAMERON ASARCO EXPLORATION COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED TORONTO,- ONTARIO ' MARCH 1976

J. I t- -i. ^*- S C-*- /V*? V v- MlY - Ontario

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

J. It , lA-Oi 6C,-J(

t- -i. ^*- S"

C-*- /V*? Vv-

MlY.5

42A12SE8366 2.8103 JAMIESON 010

REPORT ON OVERBURDEN DRILLING

AND GEOCHEMICAL RESULTS

JA-JE PROJECT

JAMIESON TOWNSHIP PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

BY

DRI7PIELD CAMERON

ASARCO EXPLORATION COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED

TORONTO,- ONTARIO '

MARCH 1976

REPORT ON OVERBURDEN DRILLING

AND GEOCHEMICAL RESULTS

JA-JE PROJECT

1. INTRODUCTION

Following a geologic and geophysical compilation of Jamieson Twp., Ontario in 1975 by Mr. R. S. Gray, of Asarco Exploration Company of Canaela Limited, 70 contiguous claims were staked in an area bordering on the northern boundary of Godfrey Township. Thirteen overburden drill hole sites were selected at 1500 foot intervals along two east-west lines. Bradley Brothers Limited was chosen to drill the holes using a reverse circulation rig mounted on the back of a dual tracked Nodwell. The drilling was accomplished during February 1976, with samples of various overburden units being taken and analyzed for copper, zinc,lead, and silver.

2. LOCATION AND ACCESS

During 1975, Asarco Exploration Company of Canada staked 70 contig uous claims in the southern portion of Jamieson Township in Ranges I, II and III (see figure 1).

Jamieson Township is located approximately seven miles west north west of the intersection of Highways 101 and 629 in Timmins. Access to the property from this junction is westerly along Highway 101 for 4.4 miles to Highway 576 (Kam-Kotia Road), and then 6.4 miles in a northwesterly direction along Highway 576 to a bush road on the northeast side of the Highway. The Jamieson-Godfrey Township line (the south boundary of the claim block) is reached by travelling about 1.5 miles on the bush road, which can be accomplished by snow mobile or snowshoe in winter or by foot in summer.

CLAIM NUMBERS

The 70 claims on which the overburden drilling and sample analysis will be applied as assessment work-are:

INDEX M AP

Ja-Je PROJECT

SCALE : lin, : 4miles

FIGURE

-2-

P427137 - P427161 (inclusive) 25 claimsP427200 - P427221 (inclusive) 22 claimsP427254 - P427273 (inclusive) 20 claimsP442607 - P442609 (inclusive) 3 claims

4. TOPOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION

A fairly broad north-south trending ridge is located along the western boundary of the claim block; overburden holes 021, 022 and 033 are located on the eastern flank of this low topographic feature. The remainder of the land surface to the Mattagami River on the east is flat, except for stream valleys where tributaries of the Matta gami have eroded channels; occasional alder swamps are located in this area.

Overburden holes 021, 022 and 033 are located in an area of mainly poplar and birch trees; a stand of jack pine occurs close to holes 021 and 022. The remaining holes, 023 to 028. of the south fence are in predominantly coniferous bush (spruce and fir) with infrequent to frequent birch, poplar, and alders. Holes 029 to 032.of the north fence are surrounded mainly by deciduous growth (poplar, alders, and birch) with infrequent to frequent fir and spruce, and very infrequent cedar.

*

5. PREVIOUS WORK

Ground geophysical surveys over a portion of the Asarco claim block have been carried out and recorded with the government by Hollinger "ines Limited, E. Jutila ("ount Jamie Mines Limited), G. Milner (Northern Exploration Limited-Kelly Desmond Mining Limited), Porcupine Paymaster Limited (Hollinger Mines Limited),and Mespi Mines Limited. The area has been covered c number of times with airborne electro magnetic and magnetometer surveys - the most recently recorded time being in 1971 by Newmont Exploration Company. Also, about 20 diamond drill holes have been completed, in this southeastern portion of Jamieson Township.

-3-

rDespite this considerable amount of previously accomplished work,

it was concluded that mis-oriented grid lines, undrilled airborne

electromagnetic conductors, and the overburden thickness and

character presented a viable opportunity for an overburden drill

program.

6. DRILLING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPORT VEHICLES

The overburden drill was a Longyear L-38 drill which had been modified

for reverse circulation drilling and which was driven by a three

cylinder Detroit Diesel Motor. The drill had a two foot stroke and

could handle 20 feet of rods above the head. The derrick was

numbered to show depth in hole of each individual stand of rods,

and was hinged and lowered hydraulically before moving between

holes. The drill was mounted on the back of an 18 ton diesel FN 160

Flextrac Nodwell (dual tracked) and was surrounded by a removable,

partially insulated plywood drill shack. A 400 gallon water tank

on the back of this Nodwell served as a resevoir for the drilling

water and caught the water return from the hole. Water was carried

to the drill in a cylindrical 500 gallon tank which was mounted on

the back of diesel FN60 Canadair Flextrac (dual tracked).

Drill roads were broken by the FNGO Canadair Flextrac and by a

diesel Bombardier Muskeg hired specifically for this purpose. Gen

erally two men with chain saws worked with the machines on the road

making.

The drilling contract was awarded to Bradley Brothers Limited, Noranda and was handled out of their Timmins office.

7. METHOD OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING

The overburden drill holes were sunk using reverse circulation with

water as the drilling fluid. Each drill rod consisted of two con

centric pipes. Water was pumped down the outer tube, out through three holes in the face of a tricone bit where it picked up and

-4-

carried the overburden with it through the centre of the tricone and up the central tube of the drill rods. From the top of the drill rods the sample passed through a hose and through an 18 inch cyclone to a 10 mesh sieve resting on a large screen over a plastic bucket in which the minus 10 mesh fraction of -the sample collected before the water flowed from the bucket into the water tank to be re-used

The plus 10 mesh fraction was included in the sample from tills, bedrock, and locally derived gravels. The minus 10 mesh fraction collected in the bottom of the bucket and a representative portion of it was included in, and made the majority of, each sample. Samples were collected over a maximum interval of 10 feet in the upper sampled sections of the hole, while close to bedrock a five foot sample was preferred. Samples were not taken across lithologic boundaries.

A sample averaging about 15 pounds was taken if sufficient return was available, placed in a cloth sample bag, a number of which were in turn packed in larger cloth bags and shipped by rail to S.A. Averill in Ottawa for drying, sieving, tabling, and production of a non-magnetic heavy mineral concentrate. This concentrate was then analyzed by Bondar-Clegg and Company of Ottawa for copper, lead, zinc and gold.

From each sample was taken a small grab sample to be analyzed geochemically for copper, lead, zinc and silver by Technical Service Laboratories in Toronto. These analyses serve as a comparison with the results of the heavy mineral concentrate analyses, and may provide more quickly an indication of an anomalous condition.

8. SAMPLE LOGGING

A continuous log of the overburden return was raade by the geologist as each hole was being drilled. Lithologies and the presence of sulfides were of primary concern, but sample size, pebble to boulder types, drilling times, sample descriptions and lengths, et cetra,

-5-

all included in the logs. (see appendix 2 for logs).

9. ANALYSIS AND PREPARATION OF SAMPLES

The samples (59) for geochemical analysis were dried, sieved to

minus 80 mesh, and analysed using atomic absorbtion (aqua regia extraction) for copper, lead, zinc, and silver by Technical Service Laboratories (see appended certificates of analysis, Appendix 3).

The analytical results and the method of preparation of the heavy mineral concentrate derived from the bulk of the collected sample

will not be included in this report. A portion of this split will be retained for possible further testing and for binocular micro scope examination.

10. OVERBURDEN GEOCHEMICAL RESULTS

The cumulative percentage of frequency of occurrence of the values was plotted on logarithmic probability paper to define the anoma lous resutls.

Of the 45 overburden samples analyzed geochemically for copper,

lead, zinc and silver, three samples were anomalous in copper, one was anomalous in zinc, and one was anomalous in lead. No more

than one of these high values came from the same sample.

Copper values from Hole 24, samples 06 and 08 (81 p*.p.m., and 77 p.p.m) and from Hole 030, sample 04 (86 p.p.m.) were distinctly

anomalous over a population having 19.4 p.p.m. as its mean. The standard deviation was calculated to be 20.5 p.p.m. Hole 024 with the two anomalous copper values was down ice from Hole 030, which

had the third anomalous value. In the case of the latter, the sample(from the three feet immediately above bedrock) came from a pebble sand-gravel in which 555 of the sample was -10 mesh and in which the majority of the +10 mesh material was of "local" deviation; within this sample interval was a one foot diorite boulder (coarse fraction discarded) and two feet which contained several small plagioclase porphyry boulders. The anomalous

samples from hole 024 came from the basal unit of the overburden, but were neither basal samples nor consecutive samples in the hole.

The unit was a gravel consisting of approximately 65?; +10 mesh material. Sample 06 (eight feet) from 132'-14O" contained a mix ture of "foreign" and "local" pebbles and cobbles? at 131', immediately preceding this sample was a small siliceous volcanic cobble which contained S-7% disseminated pyrite; at 140' was a small grey coloured rhyolite cobble. Sample 08 (ten feet) from 150'-160' contained mainly "local" pebbles (metasediments, inter mediate volcanics, diabase, with dolomite pebbles becoming smaller and fewer than above); at 151' was a small diabase cobble ; and from 155'-160' were frequent cobbles of diabase and intermediate and felsic volcanics. The two anomalous copper values are 24 p.p.m. and 28 p.p.m. higher than the underlying bedrock (andesite tuff).

The one anomalous zinc value (231 p.p.m.) which came from hole 025, sample 04 (three feet from 79.5'-82.5') came from the top of a boulder rich section which lay immediately on bedrock. Two feet were mainly gravel and one foot came from a more clay rich, though gravelly, section. Not enough nonboulder material was obtained from Mower in this section to constitute a sample. This high zinc value came from the nearest hole to the east (1500* hole sep aration) of hole 024 which contained the two anomalous copper samples, but there was no anomalous zinc expression up-ice. It should be noted that the anomalous zinc sample is 81 p.p.m. higher than the value obtained in the underlying bedrock (interbedded rhyolite tuff and greywacke).

The single anomalous lead sample of 42 p.p.m. was from hole 027, sample 04 (two feet) from 58'-6O', and appears specious. It is from the base of a mainly local gravel section^immediately above bedrock, which was a small sample because of sample return problems, which may have been contaminated from bedrock, and which has a lead value of 26 p.p-m. less than the underlying bedrock (dacite). No holes were drilled directly up-ice from this hole.

- 7 -

Using a 0.2 p.p.m. class interval and plotting the cumulative percentage of frequence of occurrence on logarithmic probability paper indicated a normal population of silver values.

Average values obtained for the 45 overburden samples are copper-21 p.p.m., lead - 13 p.p.m., zinc - 113.5 p.p.m. and silver - 0.47 p.p.m.

11. BEDROCK GEOCHEMICAL RESULTS

Thirteen bedrock samples were analyzed geochemically. Five samples were rhyolite or rhyolite tuff; five samples were andesite or andesite tuff; and the remaining three smaples were greywacke, dacite, and interbedded intermediate to acid tuffs.

Table l illustrates bedrock values for copper, lead, zinc and silver in parts per million in the various rock type groupings.

Rhyolite-Rhyolite-tuff ____Group_________

21-04

25-05

29-04

32-02

33-05

Andesite-Andesite tuff Group -.

23-02

24-011

26-02

28-02

31-04

TABLE I

Cu. Pb. Zn. Ag. (partsper million)

25

288

14

213

15

40

13

10

16

4

2230

150

154

409

90

0.3

0.3

0.4

1.0

0.1

61

53

65

43

58

7

19

15

13

13

140

199

950

137

122

0.3

1.0

0.8

0.9

1.0

- 8 -

Table I cont,

Cu Pb Zn Ag(parts per ___ Million)

Greywacke

22-09 6 5 148 0.1

Dacite

27-05 40 68 348 0.6

Interbedded intermediate to acid tuffs

30-05 37 10 171 0.5

Statistical analysis of such small groups is not possible, although comparison of individual values to already established averages

for Superior Province rhyolites, dacites, andesites, and basalts will show empiracally anomalous samples.

Bedrock in holes 025 and 032 appears anomalous in copper, as does bedrock when analyzed for zinc in holes 021, 026, 027 and 032. The remaining andesitic to rhyolitic rocks contain normal amounts of copper,but it should be noted that all of the analyses for zinc in this group of rocks gave values at least 50% higher than the average for Superior Province rocks of the same composition. No standards were available for comparison with greywacke or the interbedded intermediate to acid tuffs, although both zinc values are probably higher than average. Lead and silver averages were not considered very reliable, but lead values in holes 021 and 027 are probably anomalous.

12. GEOLOGY

Outcrop is scarce in the eastern ^ne-half and northern one-third of Jamieson Township, but the existing surface exposure, drill hole information, and geophysical data show the township to be

- 9 -

i^fcunderlain by west northwest-east southeast trending Archean mafic to felsic metavolcanics and tuffs with subordinate metasediments which have been intruded by north to north-northwest trending diabase dykes. Minor felsic intrusives and mafic to ultramafic rocks also occur. Two former copper-zinc producers, the Jameland Mine and the Kam-Kotia Mine, are located 2h miles and 3 h miles respectively northeast of the western boundary of Asarco's claim block.

Bedrock drilled during the overburden program of 13 holes con sisted mainly of andesite to rhyolite, both flows and tuffs. One hole encountered a greywacke, and interbedded sediments were found in some of the tuff sections. No economic sulphides were encountered; pyrite varied from nil to 10?; disseminated over two feet.

13. PLEISTOCENE GEOLOGY

Two glacial advances are recorded in the overburden drilled in the . deeper holes. The same record is not preserved in the shallower holes because of the scouring or scraping action of a re-advancing glacier or because of an interference to glacial deposition by a paleotopographic feature. The retreated glacier is marked by the formation of generally extensive glaciolacustine sediments.

Most of the till sections in the various holes were sampled, although the sample of the upper tills and the tills with a high predominance of foreign pebbles and cobbles generally were not analyzed. (See appended sections for glacial stratigraphy.)

14. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In the geochemically analyzed samples, a low anomalous copper train has been identified in the basal "till" (gravel)'section between overburden holes 024 and 030. If this train is substantia ted by the heavy mineral analysis, further overburden drilling will have to be considered to locate the source of the copper

-10-

values. Single anomalous values for zinc and lead were also

found in the overburden of two separate holes.

The anomalous zinc value obtained in the bedrock sample of hole

021 may warrant further follow-up.

APPENDIX 2

GEOCHEMICAL CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSES

APPENDIX 3

OVERBURDEN LOGS

CLAIMS SUBMITTED FOR ASSESSMENT CREDIT - cont,

CLAIM NUMBERS

P427153

P427154

P427155

P427156

P427157

P427158

P427159

P427160

P427161

P427200

P427201

P427202

P427203

P427204

P427205

P42720G

P427207

P427208

P427209

P427210

P427211

P427212

P427213

P427214

P427215

P427216

P427217

P427218

P427219

P427220

P427221

P442607

P442608

P442609

NO. OF DAYS

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24;5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

.S SUBMITTED FOR ASSESSMENT CREDIT

CLAIM NUMBERS

P427254

P427255

P427256

P427257

P427258

P427259

P427260

P427261

P427262

P427263

P427264

P427265

P427266

P427267

P427268

P427269

P427270

P427271

P427272

P427273

P427137

P427138

P427139

P427140

P427141

P427142

P427143

P427144

P427145

P427146

P427147

P427148

P427149

P427150

P427151

P427152

No. Of DAYS

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24. 5 :

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

24.5

-rr ̂

^,;," \ 1

3.L

ij

^

^ 'O u?

i?- ii

i\ x

s; 0 fvJ

W 0 N

,v^

-\"

'

* '

•N *~

r*

(v\

, '

l fR

o;-

' o

- , c

o

ci 3

o -

SAM

P1E5

S) F

ROM

.s-

;

("^is;

:''-

''V

:V

LA '

fVi

0 "0

rv W

OS!

*S\-

W

0 M

\,

CO

^u

rvt*

cs1-

0

\ ^r

^

^ ̂ U

-

v,

J--

!T

EC

HN

ICA

L

SE

RV

ICE

L

A3O

RA

TO

FW

3S

SIG

NED

DA

TE.

HV

5ON

CTO

INH

VJ.O

.

rp f j

' '--

'

;^S

^.. -'

ife^s

' "j- y

.} '.^

e ?

0 W 0 -A0

'Vi

CO e 1^

-,- CO

CO

k -••; iHj? g- L

4:I'.v

i

^^t

o

0) w

lo !

! . :

-f—

t,'-.-^

o io

IK : -i

rt

Srt

\f

\^

.

V.)

t ~

-

^

--'-N

i'c

J

l

b- .'/-

01 a 0 -̂y

"SS

•i -.

- w

CO -Si

CO

' - -

r - -

-

iol!

S-TJ

c^ic

r

CV

•C

'N

c-IV

: ••-C

? !'!';-

y?

SA

MP

LE

S)

F.7.

0M

o l

.^c'

Pv^

o,:;

^^ r

- ...^

V'"

T'-

CO

NIC

AL

S

ER

VIC

E

LA

BO

RA

TO

RT

SS

DA

T;.

"dT n *

iv;t

v-*

CI

CO

CO

O

i- s

?O

'3

tf

O

w

CU

QJ

t.

(D

i-1

O

.T

o, - b

oo"

Is.

7* ON L^

-

0 O

Q •- 0

Ol

?vai c

^ N

SAM

PUK

S) F

RO

M

Q ON

O (M

o ko

i OD

l*

.

0 (M12

!X ;Ac- M

D (X 0 N

!Q -—S)

0

O

-w

0

V

~0

co i

roiO

il

hj

w

cr?

CD

N y

o "Xo

TE

CH

NIC

AL

S

ER

VIC

E

LA

BO

RA

TO

RIE

S

SIG

NED

DATE

4

7Lfe' i'

J5'C? ,S'

3'fC -?. J?

x 'irr -^yy- 9 -^.2: ji-^v- ^r^ fj*2-jr

'jjrp"*"*

j

•29 :

•t?"/X

e- P?; z

t

...u

_j....._,,.. .,. —..;

_ ____— i

, - .

"DZP'"^ fVT^' -j\fi\

l~~t-~jryT/ "** U

'^ C* ^-3* /

'*

s -

90

se?

-t-Q

7v /v y

T'

'((/F w 2I7SJ) ^'""U. (vos 5V Wf r e 1L7L?k

n

-I-T-

Do

LIre

f--

t

k v.S

i e

-1 H

"H**

i kjh

*^1

* x

.-b c r-u

r-

BM

^. .

, r

o

? M.

^ \ -

* f f

'"l

— j^

, _ _

_

__

_____

__i_

_^

-^,.

-

^__ l-

/.of- 15 K

\

l.

^ ^

^ ^ K

•, ^ Pi

tj,

BC D Og

-

pi b i

-

!| S

— AC '

— .

-"*vi-b- --x-x-y- '

Tvsrfo^

- f^rr^f^-'fVf

3-207-

-J-

l

-.-4

'H

p **vv~ 5

"KM* Jy^---^~

f-'--

i

-1

IK?

o

t-

-otl

nc

—OJrf

-o.'/

f

s*o J7-

^70'/y

11.7 E.o.H.

HW S" ~ 3', 43 P.M. g. J.

//o.

o' -

*o -

20-

O -i,'

i'Y.

iS :r JO

-y*

zr 1 36, ' X

L OZ.

-ne,

•7s"'/-ST ^^^,

su^cJi, -^*

j.//T

63-78.

.t,-79. ST' J'-.

2.S"

/,: - rt)/.vi.

^/y.yv^yixCLrtHV\442fcO*?..

2. 24. S ' .0. H .

vb~-s c rt f rrt /.o c-

d .

ac'-

-To'-

t 6oH

7o'H

6-3-4-' SJit.i

r:"" ' d 1 Z. ,

"

34- -fo '

—f 7'

- 02.

e:. c.. H.

— ..

AT c.o.H.

i /V".

o -

20-

3o'H

40-

fco-

70-

1-. -l t'.

, J

25— 4 i'

C i

.O27-OI. •f2 -

-Sl'

O2L

-/O

r 05"

*y'

E.o.H. /qT 70,

1*111 ^7 i

_i..

^

B

D.rt\. C

42.1JSI .

. o. rf.

~- ^; go ^.

/.O C-

o .

So'-

O-S"'

1 2. -45' .^ (l j v

*

E.O.ri. *r 7*?/

PAGE l.25 /v*.

"^ LI 2.6 S. TWP. rvt rtf).

J/o.~ /.o c-

o"-

10 ~

40-

60-

0-2.'

2- li'

jo7

/y -40

-r- /o

-t /to

52.- tot! (f, . 4*1,

6

77''/y - 6^ - -Uf . st^y

4...... . l

/-/o

A/".

/o i" LJ6*t,..*?taeA .^A/^tCL^evfe^td-

,/oS'.

041 '

r a

E.. d. H . rtr /'ZS'

23

'l^ i' J S" - J l .'QQ /3rU. //^ ̂ /e j //.'OO ~ 4}Q5 fifth . . J . Dfcrt A/

s c rt'f•frivf^~ /.o c-

o'"-

eo'n

qo-

O — ̂

3 -17' ft'tt.

•^77;

jri**~trti{sv, TT

-*v-

5X5"- Si'

* ""

2.'.-. 0

03O-OI

-fi t n t Q ''art f. ,*^/!/-, i-"v.., *Jt

j___........ j—-.

-..a.

"/y

J? 3o/V

^ 5V J O 7 0^7.3 Q g- Q^ ^3 JT*- 15T" 'o A'

"Z

ri T

- W5GA.1A . - \Zl\toP.tC\. g. J.

c-

O'-

5o'H

•36-

2-

(7

Ja-Je-

03I-OI

..•*3 •

02.

2.5,^76

l--

42.1)57*0 c

^' TUJJ? &6E. mftp]

g.6'07/7

Z US- 4 Mo . J.

5A/",

c-

o-

lo-

60'-

n.0^- sl&iuA^-j .

C'.-f-CTW .

cue 4?'7

a

j *

;O3Z-OI

02-

. l.. ..^. ___

^

-^f i'}.. -^c-

-j

T*1

~^"(T

1 ii

j

-•3 r- M"*

470-

,i~z

.r -

P ve''t*/

/"m&iryf-,. ,

-pi

09

-0V

07

ot

iP

^ i ^

Ministry ofNaturalResources

LandsAdministratBranch

Ontario

File 2.2103

42A12SE8366 2.21*3 JAMIESON300

Recorded HolderAsarco Exploration Company of Canada

Township or Area

m Trmn ofa "f n

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim OVERBURDEN DRILLING

GeophysicalElectromagnetic

Magnetometer —

Radiometric ——

Induced polarization .

Section 86 (18) —

Geological ——.—

see across

Geochemical.

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

.days

Man days l"~l

Special provision O

Airborne LJ

Ground HD

Notice of Intent to be issued:

D Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

[~~l No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims as they were not sufficiently covered by the survey:

Location of (13) Drill Holes 021 to 033

inclusive:

Mining Claims - P. 427150 -51-57

427255 - 56

427258 - 59

427265

427271 - 72

442607 to 09 inclusive

Cost of programme - $25,896.55

Total assessment days credit allowed - 1,726

The above thirteen mining claims may be grouped

under Section 85(6) of The Mining Act, for the

purposes of recording the work credits of

1.726 days.

Approved - December 8, 1976

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40;

828 LA. 101

oK)5

l ci.

-O-Oo o:

Macdiarmid Twp.-M. 294

41 |4^7[6^_|4^7I67_

7540 ' 427163 j 4Z7[SB 427173427287 [427288 427289 1427290 H272W|

7292 '427295 1427294 U27295 Jl2T296| P .P .P IP |p"

-- v~~v—"*P—

427338 '427165 ' 427170

427302 1427303 J 427304 427305

.427309 1427310

427321 [427334 i 427IO8

427322 1427323 427324 427325 4ZTOZB , 4Z7993 . 427114 427115— — — — r ~ ~\—|- —— —-i — — — - --- — P P \ P IP P

427329 427330 (42T33I A P. R- — — — J--- — -f — - — — J\ 419007

( f- -s*.**'-*^ - ----- - - r ---- ~-p- —^ t f- ""^ r, .r.Mtftn*?

__———Ltt osoea IC.L.M. 154

p. i p,51669 i 53080

MHO (D 'HKO(D 00.427801 [427202, 4Z7203 427204 |42p ~ IP —"p p —ip~

1 ' N^'* i j

l vi^^NJ 427209 1*87220^X,.llfc 71SV427l43! 427144

32263X1 5 2262 MHO (P\URO Q

427147 J 427148 J427I49~~ —— ~ ~ ——

427219 1427161 1427160

427260 l '427261,427262 !*27263 J^427264 l *j*™6~]p" ~~|P ~(P~~~ IP T"" "^

1 ' ' j l

427266 l 4272671 427268 |427269 427270 l 427154

O) 00 CVJ

l ci

Q. O 09 CO

12

Godfrey Twp.-M. 28442A12SE8366 2.2103 JAMIESON 200

THE TOWNSHIP OF

JAMIESONDISTRICT OF

COCHRANE

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

SCALE:MNChN4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

C.S.©Loc.LO.

M.R.O. S.R.O.

NOTES

400' surface r ights r eservation along the shores of a ll lakes a nd r ivers.

Flooding rights to areas along Matlagami River to H.E.RC. - L.O- 7085

This township lies within the Municipality of City of Timmins ,

DATE OF. ISSUE

MAY - 5 1976

SURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

PLAN NO.- M.288

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

HOLE. LOC/VTlOAJ rt/DD

Ci F CLfllrt

wwetL DCivt

WWfEL D^VVfi.

ASARCO

LOCATJ^M MAP

JESSOPDRAWN

D. m.cFILE NO.

4I-A-I2.42A12SE836S 2.ai33 JAMIESON

MO/JNTJOY

ATTACHMENT

QZ2 024. oas. 02.7. oas.

TUFF.

PROVINCE

DISTRICT

TWP JAMIESON

N.T.S. 4t--J

A'

SECTION! , LOOKJNG

BV D. M.

42AI2SE8366 2.2103 JAMIESON 320

ornce: ASARCO

DRILLING

Ja.-je PROJECTJESSOP

SCAIE DRAWN

O.M.C.DATE FILE NO.

41-A-J2

B 03O 03ZB

RriY6LlT(E.seos.

42AI2SE8366 2 .2183 JAMIESON 230

PROVINCE

DISTRICT

TWP.

N.T.S. 41-^-12.

- WEST 3ECTIQN ; LOOKING

: /"* 50o'VERTICAL SCflLE : \ " ^ 10*

BY t D, M. CAMERON

SCALE

TOROMTO OFFICE ASARCO

DRiLL/^G B

irJESSOP

DRAWN

D.M.C.DATE flLE NO.

4. j - rt - o