23
© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 © 2011, Tulsa Public Schools Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader

Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness. Value-Added Reporting. Why Did We Become Educators?. To make a difference in children's lives. “The Difference” We Can Make. What is Value Added?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public SchoolsCopyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011© 2011, Tulsa Public SchoolsJana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow

Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

Page 2: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

2

Value-Added Reporting

Page 3: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Why Did We Become Educators?

To make a difference in children's lives

Page 4: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

“The Difference” We Can Make

Page 5: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

What is Value Added?

• Value added is a measure of teacher and school effectiveness.

• Unlike a state achievement score, value-added isolates and communicates educators’ impact on students’ learning.

Page 6: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Why Use Value-Added?

Using value-added along with other data allows us to separate…

what we think is happeningfrom

what is actually happening.

Page 7: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

TPS Value-Added Reporting

• Available now for 2009-2010 and 2010-2011.

• Used for information, analysis and improvement.

• Training provided in the methodology and use of the data. – Principals: June, August and October of 2011– Teachers: October 2011

• Supported by Value Added Research Center (VARC) of Univ. of Wisconsin and Battelle for Kids.

7

Page 8: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Gardener A

Gardener B

The Oak Tree Analogy

Page 9: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Achievement Model.

Gardener AGardener B61 in.

72 in.

Page 10: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Simple Growth Model.

61 in.

72 in.Gardener AGardener B

Oak AAge 4

(Today)

Oak BAge 4

(Today)

Oak AAge 3

Oak BAge 3

47 in.52 in.+14 in

.+20 in

.

Page 11: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

+20 Average+20 Average

+ 3 for Rainfall

- 3 for Soil + 2 for Soil

- 8 for Temp + 5 for Temp_________+12 inchesDuring the year

_________+22 inches During the year

59 in.

74 in.Gardener A Gardener B

47 in.52 in.

- 5 for Rainfall

Actual Actual

Adjusted Prediction

Adjusted Prediction

The Most Revealing Approach…

Page 12: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Adjusted PredictionOak A

Adjusted PredictionOak B

ActualOak A

ActualOak B

59 in.

74 in.Gardener A

Gardener B61 in.

72 in.+2

-2

Comparing Actual Growth to Predicted Growth

Page 13: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Adjusted PredictionOak B

ActualOak B

Gardener A Gardener B

Avg. -2 in

Adjusted PredictionOak A

ActualOak A

Avg.+2 in

Value-Added Model.

Page 14: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

How do we calculate Value-Added in the education context?• Calculate the gain of scale score points for students at each school

using a prior-test and a post-test.

• Use statistical models to eliminate the effect of external factors (starting point, student demographics, etc.)

• Schools where students are growing faster than average are High Value-Added.

• Schools where students are growing slower than average are Low Value-Added.

Page 15: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

What Do We Do With Value-Added Data?• Evaluate the effectiveness of

– Instructional practices– Programs

• Identify pockets of excellence to replicate

• Detect and respond to ineffective practices and programs

Page 16: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Which Grades/Courses Have Value-Added Reporting at TPS?

Math (4-8)

Reading (4-8)

Science (5, 8)

Social Studies (5, 8)

Writing (5, 8)

Geography (7)

English II, III

Algebra I, II

Geometry

Biology I

U.S. History

Page 17: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Control Factors

The VARC/TPS model uses statistical techniques to separate the impact of schooling from other factors that may influence growth. The following are the controls used in the model:

It is important to note that controlling for demographic characteristics does not mean lowering expectations for any grouping of students addressed by the control variable.

17

Page 18: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Anatomy of the Value-Added ReportNumber of Students in

Analysis (Weighted based on time in school)

Confidence Interval(CI)

Past Academic YearVA Results

3-Year AverageVA Results

District Average Growth

Page 19: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Subgroup Detail

19

Page 20: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

Measures of Student Outcomes

Page 21: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

The Power of Two: Achievement & Growth

Ach

ievem

en

t

Value-added

Low GrowthLow Achievement

High GrowthLow Achievement

High AchievementLow Growth

High AchievementHigh Growth

• School B

• School C

• School D

• School E

• School F

• School H

• School K

• School G

• School J

• School A

Page 22: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public SchoolsCopyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

[email protected] or http://valueadded.tulsaschools.org

TPS Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

Page 23: Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness

© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools

THANK YOU

23