Upload
ami-beasley
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
January 21, 2013
FSMA Proposed Rules for Preventive Controls and Fresh ProduceKey Takeaways and Highlights
Martin J. Hahn
www.hoganlovells.com 2
Agenda
• Introduction and Overview• Summary of Preventive Control
– 10 Key Takeaways– Highlights from Major Provisions
• Summary from the Produce Safety Proposed Rule• Question and Answer Session
www.hoganlovells.com 3
Introduction
• FDA has proposed two new regulations under FSMA– Preventive Controls for human food
• Food Defense to come later
– Produce Safety
• Comments due May 16, 2013 (120 days)• FDA says that more proposed rules are forthcoming
www.hoganlovells.com 4
Overview of Preventive Controls Proposal
• Adds a new set of regulations implementing the Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls provision of FSMA
• Updates and revises the cGMPs in Part 110
• Includes several exemptions and modified requirements
• Includes a subpart on recordkeeping• Would place everything in a new
Part 117
www.hoganlovells.com 5
10 Key Takeaways
1. Proposed rule generally tracks the statute• Hazard analysis; preventive controls; monitoring;
corrective actions; verification; reanalysis; and recordkeeping
2. FDA generally provides industry flexibility• Each facility to tailor food safety plan to its own
circumstances
3. FDA has tried to align proposal with HACCP• Preamble traces origins of HACCP• Repeated references to other government HACCP
programs
www.hoganlovells.com 6
10 Key Takeaways (continued…)
4. Testing/supplier verification not required (yet)• FDA notes cost implications
• Economic analysis assumptions
• Nevertheless, FDA describes expectations in detail• Requests comment on inclusion in final rule• Need to read preamble and Appendix
5. Validation of preventive controls key issue• FDA expects high level of scientific justification
6. Warehouse exemption• Non-refrigerated warehouses – exempt• Refrigerated warehouses – modified controls• Frozen warehouses – based on reason for freezing
www.hoganlovells.com 7
10 Key Takeaways (continued . . .)
7. High emphasis on recordkeeping/FDA access• Keep records on-site at least 6 months• Always keep food safety plan on-site • Facility profiles (requested comment)• Remote access (requested comment)• Electronic records (Part 11)
8. Updates to cGMPs• Outgrowth of cGMP Modernization Initiative• Would replace Part 110 in its entirety
www.hoganlovells.com 8
10 Key Takeaways (continued . . . )
9. Defines small and very small businesses• Small – less than 500 employees across the entire
company (SBA definition)• Very small – either $250,000, $500,000, or $1,000,000 in
annual sales of food
10. Compliance dates for Preventive Controls• 1 year for large businesses• 2 years for small businesses• 3 years for very small businesses
** All from date of publication of Final regulation
www.hoganlovells.com 9
Food Safety Plan
• Prepared (or preparation overseen) by “qualified individual”
• Signed and dated by owner,
operator, or agent in charge
initially and each time modified• Would need to include:
– Hazard analysis– Preventive controls– Procedures for monitoring (including frequency), corrective
actions, and verification– Recall plan
• Would need to be written
www.hoganlovells.com 10
Hazard Analysis
• Identify and evaluate “known or reasonably foreseeable hazards” for each type of food– Proposal specifies categories of hazards to consider during
identification– Proposal specifies factors to consider
during evaluation, including:• Severity of illness• Environmental pathogens in RTE foods
exposed to the environment• Foreseeable consumer use
• Determine which hazards are
“reasonably likely to occur”• Include a justification for conclusions reached
www.hoganlovells.com 11
Preventive Controls
• Identify and implement preventive controls for those hazards reasonably likely to occur
• Preventive controls must include,
as appropriate:– Process controls– Allergen controls– Sanitation controls– Other controls– Recall plan
• Although FSMA identified cGMPs, supplier verification, and employee hygiene as preventive controls, the proposed rule does not
www.hoganlovells.com 12
Preventive Controls continued . . .
• Process controls: procedures, practices, and processes performed on food– Cooking, cooling, drying, acidifying, etc.
• Sanitation controls– Would be required in certain situations– Would need to include procedures for the
cleanliness of food contact surfaces and the prevention of cross contact and cross contamination
• Allergen controls: procedures, practices, and processes to – Protect food from cross contact during
storage and use– Ensure proper labeling
www.hoganlovells.com 13
Preventive Controls continued . . .
• Preventive controls may be implemented at critical control points (CCPs), and also may be implemented at points other than CCPs
• Parameters associated with the control (the factors that must be controlled) would be required– The maximum or minimum value or
combination of values to which the parameter must be controlled
– This is similar to requiring critical limits at critical control points, but would apply to all preventive controls, whether at a CCP or another point
www.hoganlovells.com 14
Recall Plan
• A written recall plan would be required• Would be required to contain procedures for:
– Notifying consignees– Notifying the public– Conducting effectiveness checks– Disposing of recalled product
• FDA is requesting comment on
whether it should require:– A recall plan to include procedures for notifying FDA– Mock recalls as a verification activity
www.hoganlovells.com 15
Monitoring
• Establish and implement written procedures for monitoring preventive controls– Would include frequency of monitoring activities
• FDA does not specify monitoring frequency, but states that monitoring must be performed at sufficient frequency to ensure that the preventive controls are being performed consistently
• Monitoring activities would be:– Documented– Subject to verification activities, including records review
by a qualified individual within a week after the records are created
www.hoganlovells.com 16
Corrective Actions
• Establish and implement written corrective action procedures to be used if the preventive controls are not properly implemented, including procedures to:– Identify and correct a problem to reduce the likelihood it will
recur– Evaluate all affected food for safety– Prevent affected food from entering commerce if its safety
cannot be assured
• Take the same steps AND reanalyze the food safety plan if either specific corrective action procedures have not been established or a preventive control is ineffective
• Corrective actions would need to be documented and subject to verification and records review
www.hoganlovells.com 17
Verification
• Validation– Express requirement in the proposed rule– Conducted by a qualified individual– Before the plan is implemented (or within
the first 6 weeks of production if necessary); following reanalysis as needed
– Would include collecting and evaluating scientific and technical information
– Food allergen controls, sanitation controls, and the recall plan would not need to be validated
www.hoganlovells.com 18
Verification continued…
• Monitoring– Verify that monitoring is being
conducted, such as through
observation or independent tests
• Corrective Actions– Verify that appropriate decisions are being made
• Verification– Verify that the preventive controls are consistently
implemented and are effective
• Calibration– Establish and implement written procedures for the frequency
of calibrating process monitoring and verification instruments
www.hoganlovells.com 19
Verification continued…
• Internal Records Review– Conducted or overseen by qualified individual– Review monitoring and corrective action records within a
week after they were made– Review calibration records within a reasonable time
• Consumer Complaints– Proposal would not require review of consumer complaints
as a verification activity, but FDA seeks comment on this issue
• Documentation– All verification activities would need to be documented
www.hoganlovells.com 20
Verification continued . . .
• Reanalysis of the plan would be required– At least every three years– Whenever a significant change is made in the
activities at the facility affecting the hazard analysis
– Whenever a preventive control is found ineffective
– Whenever a preventive control is not properly implemented and there was no established corrective action procedure
– Whenever the facility becomes aware of new information about potential hazards
– As mandated by FDA in response to new hazards and developments in scientific understanding
www.hoganlovells.com 21
Qualified Individual
• Qualified individual(s) would need to do or oversee:– Preparation of the food safety plan– Validation of preventive controls– Review of records for implementation of preventive
controls and appropriateness of corrective actions– Reanalysis of the food safety plan
• Qualification would be either through education/training or experience
• Applicable training would be documented, including type, date, and person trained
www.hoganlovells.com 22
Recordkeeping
• New requirements would apply to all records required by new Part 117
• FDA is proposing to require facilities to establish and maintain records documenting– Written food safety plan– Monitoring of preventive controls– Corrective actions– Verification activities– Training for qualified individuals
www.hoganlovells.com 23
Recordkeeping continued…
• Records would need to be:– Originals, true copies, or electronic records– Contain actual values and observations– Be accurate, indelible, and legible– Be created concurrently with performance of
the activity documented– Be as detailed as necessary to provide
history of the work performed– Include:
• Name and location of the facility• Date and time of activity documented• Signature/initials of person performing the activity• Where appropriate the identity of the product and
production code
www.hoganlovells.com 24
Recordkeeping continued…
• Location:– Retained for 2 years, but off-site storage permitted after
6 months if records can be provided within 24 hours– Food safety plan must always remain on-site– Electronic records considered on-site if accessible
• Electronic records:– FDA proposes requiring compliance with Part 11, but
seeks comment on whether an exemption is appropriate (as with BT Act)
• Disclosure:– Records would be subject to disclosure under the FOIA
www.hoganlovells.com 25
Records Access
• Records would be required to be made “promptly available to a duly authorized representative” “upon oral or written request”– FDA states this is consistent with its
HACCP regulations, which require
records be available for review and
copying– FDA seeks comment on whether to
explicitly require facilities to send records
to the agency and whether they should be
required to be submitted electronically
• FDA seeks comment on whether to require the submission of “facility profiles” (products, hazards, and preventive controls)
www.hoganlovells.com 26
Warehouses
• Exempt: Facilities solely engaged in the storage of– Non-refrigerated packaged food not exposed to the
environment– Raw agricultural commodities (other than fruits or
vegetables) intended for further distribution or processing
• Modified Requirements: – Facilities that store refrigerated
packaged food that requires
time/temperature control for safety
(TCS)
www.hoganlovells.com 27
Refrigerated Warehouses
• FDA expects the warehouse to learn whether a particular food requires time/temperature control for safety from the manufacturer, the label, or the scientific/technical literature– Rare for a frozen food to be a TCS food
• Modified requirements:– Establish and implement temperature controls– Monitor temperature controls– Take corrective actions– Verify that temperature controls are implemented consistently
(through calibrating devices and reviewing records)– Document monitoring, corrective actions, verification
activities
www.hoganlovells.com 28
Testing and Supplier Verification
• Although expressly mentioned in the statute, testing and supplier verification are not being required as preventive controls/verification activities, likely due to cost
• But the proposed rule contains extensive discussion of the value of such programs, key attributes, and FDA’s expectations for such programs
• FDA seeks comment on whether to impose requirements in these areas and extent of any final requirements (Read preamble and Appendix Carefully)
www.hoganlovells.com 29
Revisions to cGMPs
• In general, FDA proposes:– Clarifying that certain provisions require protection against
cross contact of food in order to address allergens– That provisions directed to preventing contamination of
food and food contact surfaces include preventing contamination of food packaging materials as well
– Deleting certain provisions containing recommendations– Modernizing and updating the language
• FDA is requesting comment on whether:– It should mandate employee training– It should require, rather than recommend, certain
provisions (e.g., cleaning non-food-contact surfaces)
www.hoganlovells.com 30
Other Exemptions/Modified Requirements
• “Qualified facilities” • Very small businesses• Certain low-risk on-farm activities• Dietary supplements• Alcoholic beverages• Foods subject to seafood or juice HACCP • Farms• Microbiological hazards addressed by the LACF
regulation (note, only micro hazards—and no exemption for acidified foods)
www.hoganlovells.com 31
Legal Authority• FDA cites the FFDCA, FSMA, and the PHS• FSMA states that failure to comply with Preventive
Controls is a prohibited act• Proposed rule states that failure to
comply with cGMPs and/or FSMA will
be considered in determining whether
food is adulterated or in violation of the PHS• Preventive Controls requirements would apply to
intrastate activities• Whether each provision of FDA’s proposal in within the
bounds of its statutory authority warrants close review
www.hoganlovells.com 32
Produce Safety Proposed Rule
• FSMA requires FDA to establish requirements for “high risk” product
• FDA concludes all produce presents comparable risks and are “high risk”
• The proposal would cover any food that falls within the definition of “raw agricultural commodity,” unless exempt
• The definition of produce includes any fruit or vegetable including almonds, peanuts, and walnuts, but exempts cereal grains such as wheat, barley, rye, field corn, any many otherss
www.hoganlovells.com 33
Exemptions from the Rule
1. Produce rarely consumed raw– The regulation contains a complete list of “produce”– Peanuts are included on this list and specifically
excluded
2. Produce for personal consumption by the farmer who grew it
3. Produce that is not a raw agricultural commodity
4. Produce that meets the following three criteria– Produce receives commercial processing that reduces
pathogens of public health significance– You have records documenting the recipient of the
produce will indeed process it– You are subject to record keeping and other enforcement
requirements
(FDA identifies almonds and walnuts as examples of products that would meet the above exemption)
www.hoganlovells.com 34
Produce Safety Rule
• What are the potential food safety hazards when raising produce?– Worker Training and Health and Hygiene– Agricultural Water– Biological Soil Amendments– Domesticated and Wild Animals– Equipment, Tools, and Buildings– Sprouts
• Generally, more like cGMPs than HACCP• Compliance date is two years (more for small and
very small businesses) after passage (water is an additional two years)
www.hoganlovells.com 35
Worker Training & Hygiene
• Personal cleanliness• No communicable
diseases• Washing hands, with
running water, soap, and dry afterwards
• Avoid contact with animals
www.hoganlovells.com 36
Water
• Inspection of water system at beginning of season
• Treat with EPA approved pesticides when necessary
• Testing of water quality• Establishment of water
quality standards depending on use
• Testing at the beginning and every 3 months
www.hoganlovells.com 37
Soil “Amendments”
• Establishes detail requirements regarding compost quality
• Prohibits most use of human waste
• Identifies treatments that can be used for soil amendments from animal waste
• Establishes application intervals (0 days, 45 days, 9 monhts)
www.hoganlovells.com 38
Wild and Domestic Animals
• Restricts use of lands used for grazing by domestic animals
• Addresses “animal intrusion” by wild animals
www.hoganlovells.com 39
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, & Holding
• Segregate produce from excluded products
• Cannot harvest visibly contaminated products
• Don’t contaminate produce during harvest
• Prohibits use of dropped produce
• Addressing packaging materials
www.hoganlovells.com 40
Equipment, Buildings, Tools
• Establishes minimum requirements for buildings and equipment
• Pest control• Toilet facilities• Hand washing facilities• Presence of
domesticated animals
• Sewage disposal• Trash disposal• Plumbing
www.hoganlovells.com 41
And a little reminder…
• Be sure your company has renewed the registration of its facilities by January 31st
• Check on your co-manufacturers and suppliers, too!– If they have not renewed their registrations, they likely will
be cancelled by FDA (which prohibits them from importing product) and then will require re-registration (new number)
www.hoganlovells.com 42
Conclusion
• FDA responded in part to several of industry’s concerns
• The proposed preventive controls requirements warrant close review
• The absence of proposed requirements for testing and supplier verification pose special challenges
• Economic assessment will be very important
Lots of work ahead!