Upload
kay-n-dee-books
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
1/21
Appendix 1
From: Jayne WoodsideSent: 23 November 2015 08:35To: '[email protected]'Subject: FW: COIs needed for BMJ retraction letter
Dear Angela,
Please fine attached.
Best wishes,
Jayne
Professor Jayne WoodsideNutrition and Metabolism GroupCentre for Public Health First Floor
Institute of Clinical Science B Grosvenor RoadBelfastBT12 6BJUKTel: 0044 2890 632585Fax: 0044 2890 235900
From: Bonnie Liebman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 19 November 2015 16:08To: Bonnie LiebmanSubject: COIs needed for BMJ retraction letter
Dear Colleague:
In response to our letter asking the BMJ to retract the “investigation” by Nina Teicholz, the
journal has told us that “the BMJ is continuing to review this article and plan to respond more
fully when our further enquiries are complete.”
In the meantime, the BMJ has invited us to post the letter as a rapid response to the online
article. In order to post the letter, we have to send the journal a conflict-of-interest form for
each co-signer.
Please fill out page 4 of the form (attached) and email it back to my colleague, Angela Amico
([email protected]). Once we hear from everyone, she will submit the forms to the BMJ.
More information about competing interests for a rapid response is available here:
http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-
competing-interests
Best wishes,
Bonnie Liebman
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interestshttp://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interestshttp://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interestshttp://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interestshttp://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policies-and-checklists/declaration-competing-interestsmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
2/21
2
_______________________________
Bonnie F. Liebman, MSDirector of Nutrition
Center for Science in the Public Interest1220 L St., NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Ph: (202) 777-8335
Fax: (202) 265-4954
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
3/21
3
From: Bonnie Liebman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 05 November 2015 17:27To: Bonnie LiebmanSubject: request for retraction of Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee report investigation
Dear Colleague: Thank you for agreeing to sign the letter urging the BMJ to retract its
“investigation” of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee’s report. The letter was signed
by more than 180 scientists in 19 countries.
We sent the final version of the letter (attached) to the BMJ editors this morning. You can
also find a version of the letter with live links to the footnotes on our website (see URL
below). The letter notes (at the end of the last page) that affiliations were listed for purposes
of identification only.
http://cspinet.org/bmj-retraction-letter.html
Best wishes,
Bonnie Liebman
_______________________________
Bonnie F. Liebman, MSDirector of Nutrition
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L St., NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Ph: (202) 777-8335Fax: (202) 265-4954
From: Jeff CroninSent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 10:17 AMTo: [email protected]: [email protected]: request for retraction of Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee reportinvestigation
Dear Editors,
Please accept this letter asking the BMJ to retract the investigation by Nina Teicholz into the
report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.
Sincerely,
Jeff CroninDirector of Communications
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street, NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Ph: 202.777.8370
Cell: 202-421-8911
mailto:[email protected]://cspinet.org/bmj-retraction-letter.htmlhttp://cspinet.org/bmj-retraction-letter.htmlmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://qub-staff-cfs1/staff/StaffShared2/InfoMgmt/INFORMATION%20MANAGEMENT/Freedom%20Of%20Information%20Act/Requests%20for%20Information/2015/FOI-15-269%20-%20Mr%20Jones%20(BMJ%20Conflict%20of%20Interest%20form)/cspinet.orghttp://qub-staff-cfs1/staff/StaffShared2/InfoMgmt/INFORMATION%20MANAGEMENT/Freedom%20Of%20Information%20Act/Requests%20for%20Information/2015/FOI-15-269%20-%20Mr%20Jones%20(BMJ%20Conflict%20of%20Interest%20form)/cspinet.orgmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://cspinet.org/bmj-retraction-letter.htmlmailto:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
4/21
4
From: Angela Amico [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 04 November 2015 15:23To: Jayne WoodsideSubject: RE: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Great, thank you for your support.
Best,
Angela
Angela Amico, MPH
Project Coordinator
Health Promotion Policy & Biotechnology
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20005
Direct: [email protected]
From: Jayne Woodside [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 2:50 AMTo: Angela Amico Subject: RE: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Dear Angela,
I am PhD.
Best wishes,
Jayne
Professor Jayne WoodsideNutrition and Metabolism GroupCentre for Public Health First Floor Institute of Clinical Science B Grosvenor Road
BelfastBT12 6BJUKTel: 0044 2890 632585Fax: 0044 2890 235900
mailto:[email protected]://cspinet.org/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://cspinet.org/mailto:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
5/21
5
From: Jayne WoodsideSent: 02 November 2015 07:52To: Michelle McKinley ([email protected]); Marie CantwellSubject: FW: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Professor Jayne Woodside
Nutrition and Metabolism GroupCentre for Public Health First Floor Institute of Clinical Science B Grosvenor RoadBelfastBT12 6BJUKTel: 0044 2890 632585Fax: 0044 2890 235900
From: Angeliki Papadaki [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 01 November 2015 12:48To: Arne Astrup; Saris, Wim; Inge Huybrechts; [email protected]; Inga Þórsdóttir; Andy Ness;[email protected]; Agneta Yngve; Sibylle Kranz; [email protected]; [email protected]; Antonis Kafatos; Jayne Woodside; Janet Cade; Dianne WardSubject: Fwd: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Dear colleagues,
Please see attached a suggestion for a BMJ retraction letter, instigated by Frank Hu at
Harvard. We were asked to circulate the letter for signatures.
If you agree, please send an email to Bonnie Liebman ([email protected]) with a similar
content to the below, in blue font, and circulate to your colleagues.
I have read the full version of the attached letter and Iagree to include my sign on it.I endorse its full content and the request to the BMJ toretract the journalist's article.
Kind regards,
Angeliki
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
6/21
6
From: Angela Amico [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 02 November 2015 22:22To: Jayne WoodsideSubject: RE: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Thank you for your support of the retraction letter to the BMJ. Can you please respond with
any post-graduate degrees you may have? We would like to ensure that we correctly credit all
the signatories.
Best,
Angela
Angela Amico, MPH
Project Coordinator
Health Promotion Policy & Biotechnology
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L Street NW, Suite 300Washington, D.C. 20005
Direct: 202-777-8307
From: Jayne Woodside [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 2:52 AMTo: Bonnie Liebman Subject: Fwd: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Dear Bonnie,
I have read the full version of the attached letter and I agree to include my sign on it.
I endorse its full content and the request to the BMJ to retract the journalist's article.
Best wishes,
Jayne
Professor Jayne Woodside
Nutrition and Metabolism GroupCentre for Public Health First Floor Institute of Clinical Science B Grosvenor RoadBelfastBT12 6BJUKTel: 0044 2890 632585Fax: 0044 2890 235900
mailto:[email protected]://cspinet.org/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://cspinet.org/mailto:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
7/21
7
From: Angeliki Papadaki [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 01 November 2015 12:48To: Arne Astrup; Saris, Wim; Inge Huybrechts; [email protected]; Inga Þórsdóttir; Andy Ness;[email protected]; Agneta Yngve; Sibylle Kranz; [email protected]; [email protected]; Antonis Kafatos; Jayne Woodside; Janet Cade; Dianne WardSubject: Fwd: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Dear colleagues,
Please see attached a suggestion for a BMJ retraction letter, instigated by Frank Hu at
Harvard. We were asked to circulate the letter for signatures.
If you agree, please send an email to Bonnie Liebman ([email protected]) with a similar
content to the below, in blue font, and circulate to your colleagues.
I have read the full version of the attached letter and I
agree to include my sign on it.I endorse its full content and the request to the BMJ toretract the journalist's article.
Kind regards,
Angeliki
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Miguel Ángel Martínez González Date: 1 November 2015 at 11:36
Subject: Fwd: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
To: Antonia Trichopoulou , [email protected], Katia
Esposito , [email protected], Federico Jose
Armando Perez Cueto Eulert , "ligia.dominguez"
, Matthias Schulze , Iris Shai
, [email protected], [email protected], Angeliki Papadaki
, Arne Astrup ,
[email protected], jose luchsinger , Nikolaos Scarmeas
, Christian Carpéné , Olle
Melander , [email protected], Marc Molendijk
, Adriano Marçal Pimenta
, Helfimed Study UniSA
Cc: Frank Hu
Yes, of course, Frank.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
8/21
8
I have read the full version of the attached letter and Iagree to include my sign on it.I endorse its full content and the request to the BMJ to
retract the journalist's article.
I'm forwarding to my friends and colleagues this invitation to sign the attached
letter:
Dear colleagues,
if you agree, you can send an email to Bonnie Liebman with a similar content to what I have written above in blue font .
I would thank you all very much if you are so kind as to askalso to your friends from different European countries to sign
the attached letter for the sake of science and public health.
Best regards,
miguel--
Miguel A. Martinez-Gonzalez
University of Navarra-CIBEROBNwww.unav.es/preventiva
www.proyectosun.es
www.predimed.es
www.predimedplus.com
www.ciberobn.es
Research Gate
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Frank Hu wrote:
Hi Miguel,
Would you like to sign the attached letter to retract the BMJ article? if so, please email
Bonnie Liebman .
I would greatly appreciate if you can ask your colleagues in Spain and other European
countries to sign the letter. I think it is extremely important to retract the terrible BMJ article
for the sake of science and public health.
Many thanks
frank
mailto:[email protected]://www.unav.es/preventivahttp://www.proyectosun.es/http://www.predimed.es/http://www.predimedplus.com/http://www.ciberobn.es/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miguel_Martinez-Gonzalez/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miguel_Martinez-Gonzalez/http://www.ciberobn.es/http://www.predimedplus.com/http://www.predimed.es/http://www.proyectosun.es/http://www.unav.es/preventivamailto:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
9/21
9
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bonnie Liebman Date: Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:36 PM
Subject: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
To: Bonnie Liebman
Dear Colleague:
On Sept. 24, the BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) published an “investigation” entitled,
“The Scientific Report Guiding the US Dietary Guidelines: Is it Scientific?” The article (attached) was
written by Nina Teicholz, a journalist and author of The Big Fat Surprise” Why Butter, Meat, &
Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet .
The article is riddled with errors. For example, Teicholz claims that the report of the 2015 Dietary
Guidelines Advisory Committee used “weak scientific standards” because it relied on fewer reviews
by USDA’s Nutrition Evidence Library (NEL) than the 2010 DGAC committee and instead conducted
“ad hoc examinations of the scientific literature.”
In fact, there were no ad hoc examinations. The appendices to the 2015 DGAC report specify the
search strategy, inclusion criteria, search results, and AMSTAR ratings for the systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, and other studies used by the DGAC. The attached letter documents ten additional
factual errors in the article.
(Note: The BMJ article was timed to coincide with an October 7 hearing of the House Agriculture
Committee, where it was used to criticize the 2015 DGAC’s scientific integrity.)
The attached letter urges the BMJ to retract the investigation. Please let us know by Tuesday,
November 3, if you would like to co-sign the letter. (Please also feel free to pass it on to yourcolleagues.)
Thanks,
Bonnie Liebman
_______________________________
Bonnie F. Liebman, MS
Director of NutritionCenter for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L St., NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Ph: (202) 777-8335
Fax: (202) 265-4954
--
*******************************************************
Frank B. Hu, MD, PhD
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
10/21
10
Professor of Nutrition and Epidemiology
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
665 Huntington ave, Boston, MA 02115
tel: 617 432 0113 fax: 617 432 2435
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/frank-hu/
******************************************************
--
Miguel A. Martinez-Gonzalez
University of Navarra
www.unav.es/preventiva
www.proyectosun.es
www.predimed.eswww.predimedplus.com
www.ciberobn.es
Research Gate
--
Angeliki Papadaki, PhD, MSc (Med Sci), FHEALecturer in Public Health Nutrition
Programme Director, MSc Nutrition, Physical Activity and Public Health
Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health SciencesSchool for Policy Studies
University of Bristol
8 Priory Rd
Bristol BS8 1TZ
UK
Tel: +44 (0) 117 3310453
Fax: +44 (0) 117 3310418
Office: Room 2G1, 12 Woodland Rd, BS8 1UQ
Personal webpage: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.html Twitter: @AngelikPapadaki
Our unique MSc in Nutrition, Physical Activity and Public Health is recruiting now forSeptember 2016 intake.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/frank-hu/http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/frank-hu/http://www.unav.es/preventivahttp://www.proyectosun.es/http://www.predimed.es/http://www.predimedplus.com/http://www.ciberobn.es/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miguel_Martinez-Gonzalez/http://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.htmlhttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.htmlhttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.htmlhttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.htmlhttps://twitter.com/AngelikPapadakihttps://twitter.com/AngelikPapadakihttps://twitter.com/AngelikPapadakihttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/studying/postgraduateprogrammes/postgraduatetaught/nutritionpublichealth/index.htmlhttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/studying/postgraduateprogrammes/postgraduatetaught/nutritionpublichealth/index.htmlhttps://twitter.com/AngelikPapadakihttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.htmlhttp://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/people/angeliki-papadaki/overview.htmlhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miguel_Martinez-Gonzalez/http://www.ciberobn.es/http://www.predimedplus.com/http://www.predimed.es/http://www.proyectosun.es/http://www.unav.es/preventivahttp://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/frank-hu/http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/faculty/frank-hu/
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
11/21
Suggested BMJ retraction letter (see Page 7, Appendix 1) Appendix 2
Dear Editor:
A recent article by journalist Nina Teicholz,1 which was published as a “BMJ Investigation”
of the Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC),2
included numerous errors and misrepresentations. Below we have summarized only
factual errors, excluding incorrect or biased interpretations of research. The mistakes arebolded.
Because the “investigation” as a whole is so riddled with errors, we urge the BMJ to retract
it, not only to inform your readers, but also to protect the BMJ’s credibility.
1.
Teicholz states that “in its 2015 report the committee stated that it did not use
NEL reviews for more than 70% of the topics, including some of the most
controversial issues in nutrition. Instead, it relied on systematic reviews by
external professional associations, almost exclusively the American Heart
Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), or conductedan [sic] hoc examination of the scientific literature without well defined
systematic criteria for how studies or outside review papers were
identified, selected, or evaluated.”
Correction: In Appendix E-2, the Evidence Portfolios for the key topics addressed by
Teicholz specify the search strategy, inclusion criteria, search results, and AMSTAR ratings
for methodological quality for the existing systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses
(MA).3 Note that it was the NEL, not the DGAC, that “identified any existing high-quality SRs
and/or MAs that addressed the topic or SR questions posed.”4
2.
Teicholz states that “instead of requesting a new NEL review for the recent
literature on this crucial topic, however, the 2015 committee recommended
extending the current cap on saturated fats, at 10% of calories, based on a review
by the AHA and ACC, a 2010 NEL review, and the committee’s ad hoc selection of
seven review papers (see table A on thebmj.com).” Table A states that “nomethodology for this section of the report : no reason given for why certain
studies were selected for review and others were not, nor how they were
evaluated relative to each other.”
Correction: Appendix E-2.43 gives the search strategy, inclusion criteria, search results,
and AMSTAR ratings for methodological quality for the seven review papers, along with alist of excluded articles and the reasons for exclusion.5 (Note: In Table A, Teicholz states
1 http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h49622 http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/3 http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/4 http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/05-methodology.asp5 http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-43.asp
http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-43.asphttp://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-43.asphttp://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-43.asphttp://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-43.asp
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
12/21
that “the overall conclusion [of the 2012 Cochrane review by Hooper, et al.] is therefore
that while saturated-fat restriction appears to reduce heart attack risk, it does not reduce
overall or cardiovascular mortality (death), which is arguably the more important
endpoint.”6 This statement contradicts Teicholz’s article, which said that Hooper, et al.“failed to confirm an association between saturated fats and heart disease.” The BMJ
corrected this error a month after it was published.)
3. Teicholz states that “use of external reviews by professional associations isproblematic because these groups conduct literature reviews according to
different standards and are supported by food and drug companies.”
Correction: The “problematic” external review cited by Teicholz was not conducted solely
by professional associations. The review was actually a “clinical practice guideline”developed by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology in
partnership with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.7 The NHLBI’s website
clearly describes its rigorous standards for assessing the quality of studies and its policy for
managing potential conflicts of interest and relationships with industry. The NHLBI’s
standards for identifying, grading, and assessing the quality of studies are as rigorous, if not
more rigorous, than those used by the NEL.
4. Teicholz states that “in t he NEL systematic review on saturated fats from2010…f ewer than 12 small trials are cited, and none supports the hypothesis
that saturated fats cause heart disease (see table B on thebmj.com).”
Correction: It is incorrect to state that none of the trials cited in the 2010 NEL reviewsupports the hypothesis that saturated fats cause heart disease. The 2010 NEL review
found “strong evidence” that saturated fat intake increases the risk of cardiovascular
disease. In Table B, Teicholz over-rules the 2010 NEL review by assigning each trial to one
of four categories (a) “trials that should not have been included because they did not meet
inclusion criteria,” (b) “trials that should not have been included because they did not test
normally occuring [sic] saturated fats or saturated fats at all,” (c) “trials concluding thatsaturated fats had a neutrial [sic] or beneficial effect on health,” and (d) “trials with mixed
results on blood lipid measures.”8 (Note: Table B has additional errors too numerous to listhere.) Thus, Teicholz concludes that the 2010 NEL review is substandard, but she also
argues that the 2015 “committee’s report used weak scientific standards,” because it did
not rely sufficiently on NEL reviews.
6 http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/suppl/2015/09/23/bmj.h4962.DC1/teicholzmaster2609.wt1_default.pdf7 http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/lifestyle8 http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/suppl/2015/09/23/bmj.h4962.DC1/teicholzmaster2609.wt2_default.pdf
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
13/21
5.
Teicholz states that “perhaps more important are the studies that have never
been systematically reviewed by any of the dietary guideline committees.
These include the large, government funded randomized controlled trials on
saturated fats and heart disease from the 1960s and ’70s. Taken together, these
trials followed more than 25 000 people, some for up to 12 years. They are some
of the most ambitious, well controlled nutrition studies ever undertaken.”
Correction: It is incorrect to state that these trials were not reviewed by the DGAC. The
DGAC considered a 2012 Cochrane review that included 4 of the 6 trials cited by Teicholz
and a 2010 meta-analysis that included 5 of the 6 trials cited by Teicholz.910 (The review
and meta-analysis both concluded that replacing saturated fats with unsaturated fats
reduce the risk of heart disease.) One trial cited by Teicholz is excluded from most meta-
analyses because it tested a multifactorial intervention including drug treatment for
hypertension, counseling for cigarette smoking, and dietary advice for lowering blood
cholesterol levels.11
6. Teicholz states that “there have been at a minimum, three National Institutes
of Health funded trials on some 50 000 people showing that a diet low in fat
and saturated fat is ineffective for fighting heart disease, obesity, diabetes,
or cancer. Two of these trials are omitted from the NEL review….When the
omitted findings from these three clinical trials are factored into the review, the
overwhelming preponderance of rigorous evidence does not support any of the
dietary committee’s health claims for its recommended diets.”
Correction: The two trials that were “omitted from the NEL review” did not assess the
impact of diet “for fighting heart disease, obesity, diabetes, or cancer.” They assessed the
9 Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Thompson R, Sills D, Roberts FG, Moore HJ, Davey Smith G. Reduced or modified
dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;5:CD002137. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD002137.pub310 Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S. Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place
of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med
2010;7:e1000252.11 Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Multiple risk factor intervention trial. Risk factor changes
and mortality results. JAMA 1982;248:1465-77.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
14/21
impact of diet on serum cholesterol levels.12,13 Furthermore, all three trials were included
in the Cochrane review that was considered by the DGAC.14)
7.
Teicholz states that “The report also gave a strong rating to the evidence that its
recommended diets can fight heart disease.…The committee reviewed other,more recent studies but not using any systematic or predefined methods.”
Correction: Appendix E-2.26 gives the search strategy, inclusion criteria, search results,
and AMSTAR ratings for methodological quality for the six “more recent studies,” along
with a list of excluded articles and the reasons for exclusion.15
8.
In Table D, Teicholz includes sections (under “dietary patterns and heart disease”
and “dietary patterns and obesity”) entitled “DGAC ad hoc review of the
scientific literature” where she states that “no systematic methodology is givenfor the selection of these studies. It is therefore impossible to know if they
fairly represent the literature.”
Correction: These were not ad hoc reviews. The DGAC details the systematic methodology
for selecting these studies in Appendices E-2.26 and E2.27.16 Note: Teicholz’s Table D17
consists largely of Teicholz’s criticism of the NEL’s Systematic Reviews on the Relationship
between Dietary Patterns and Health Outcomes, published in 2014.18 Note that Teicholz
argues that NEL reviews are substandard, but she also argues that the 2015 “committee’s
report used weak scientific standards,” because it did not rely sufficiently on NEL reviews.
9.
Teicholz states that “Consulting the NEL for a review on this topic turns up a
surprising fact: a systematic review on health and red meat has not been done.
Although several analyses look at ‘animal protein products,’ these reviews
12 Walden CE, Retzlaff BM, Buck BL, Wallick S, McCann BS, Knopp RH. Differential effect of National Cholesterol
Education Program (NCEP) Step II diet on HDL cholesterol, its subfractions, and apoprotein A-I levels in
hypercholesterolemic women and men after 1 year: The beFIT Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1580-
7.13 Knopp RH, Walden CE, Retzlaff BM, et al. Long-term cholesterol-lowering effects of 4 fat-restricted diets in
hypercholesterolemic and combined hyperlipidemic men. The Dietary Alternatives Study. JAMA 1997;278:1509-15.14Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Thompson R, Sills D, Roberts FG, Moore HJ, Davey Smith G. Reduced or modified
dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;5:CD002137. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD002137.pub315 http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-26.asp16 http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-26.asp
http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/14-appendix-E2/e2-27.asp17 http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/suppl/2015/09/23/bmj.h4962.DC1/teicholzmaster2609.wt4_default.pdf18 http://www.nel.gov/vault/2440/web/files/DietaryPatterns/DPRptFullFinal.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Davey%20Smith%20G%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Moore%20HJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Roberts%20FG%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Sills%20D%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Thompson%20R%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Summerbell%20CD%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Hooper%20L%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22592684
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
15/21
include eggs, fish, and dairy and therefore do not isolate the health effects of
red meat , or meat of any kind.
Correction: The NEL reviews cited by Teicholz do examine the results on red meat and
processed meats separately from the results on other animal proteins.19
10. Teicholz states that “The committee’s approach to the evidence on saturated fats
and low carbohydrate diets reflects an apparent failure to address any evidence
that contradicts what has been official nutritional advice for the past 35 years.
The foundation of that advice has been to recommend eating less fat and
fewer animal products (meat, dairy, eggs) while shifting calorie intake
towards more plant foods (fruits, vegetables, grains, and vegetable oils) for good
health. And in the past decades, this advice has remained virtually unchanged.”
Correction: The 2015 DGAC did not recommend “eating less fat” or reducing the
consumption of eggs or dairy products. (In fact, Teicholz wrote in a February New YorkTimes op-ed that “experts on the committee that develops the country’s dietary guidelines
acknowledged that they had ditched the low-fat diet.”20) The Dietary Guidelines for
Americans has never recommended eating less meat or dairy products. (In some editions,
the DGA has included advice such as “moderate your use of eggs” or “use egg yolks and
whole eggs in moderation. Use egg whites and egg substitutes freely…”).
11.
Teicholz states that “studies showed mixed health outcomes for saturated fats,
but early critical reviews, including one by the National Academy of Sciences,
which cautioned against the inconclusive state of the evidence on saturated fatsand heart disease, were dismissed by the USDA when it launched the first
dietary guidelines in 1980.”
Correction: The USDA (and DHHS) published the 1980 Dietary Guidelines for Americans in
February 1980. Toward Healthful Diets, the National Academy of Sciences report cited by
Teicholz, was published in May 1980.21 USDA could not have dismissed Toward Healthful
Diets, because the report was published after the Dietary Guidelines were released.
In summary, the Teicholz/BMJ “investigation” is based on non-facts. Such a paper has no
place in the pages of a prominent scientific journal and should be retracted.
19 http://www.nel.gov/template.cfm?template=sort_list_template&key=83520 Teicholz N. The government’s bad diet advice. The New York Times, 2015 Feb 20.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/21/opinion/when-the-government-tells-you-what-to-eat.html 21 National Research Council, Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences. Toward Healthful Diets.
National Academy Press, 1980.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/21/opinion/when-the-government-tells-you-what-to-eat.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/21/opinion/when-the-government-tells-you-what-to-eat.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/21/opinion/when-the-government-tells-you-what-to-eat.html
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
16/21
Competing Interests Form (see Page 1, Appendix 1) Appendix 3
BMJ policy on declaration of interests
BMJ is committed to ensuring the independence and integrity of our content, products, and services.We strive, therefore, to be transparent about any interests that our users, customers, and partnersmight want to know about. This policy on declaration of interests applies to everyone involved in theconception, creation, and delivery of our content, products, and services.
1. What interests should I declare?
We want to hear about interests that might conflict with the work you are doing or have been asked todo for BMJ. A conflict of interest arises when a person has a personal or organisational interest thatmay influence or appear to influence the work they are doing. Usually this is a financial interest, but itmay also be non-financial.
Above all we want transparency about any personal or organisational interests that might be seen asa conflict of interest in relation to the task a person is being asked to do for BMJ.
Conflicts of interest are often unavoidable, and should be managed as far as possible rather thanprohibited. But some interests may be so conflicting that the individuals involved should not do thetask the BMJ needs doing.
The examples given in this document are not an exhaustive list. Individuals should ask themselves ifthere is anything that may strongly bias their judgement and potentially preclude them fromperforming the task requested of them, as well as anything that someone using BMJ products andservices might want to know, or that might cause embarrassment or reputational damage ifdiscovered after the event.
We ask people to be as clear and specific as possible about the activities, relationships, and viewsthey are declaring. We may ask for more details about any declaration. We would want to know, forexample, what honorariums were for and how much they were for. In declaring travel expenses, wewould want to know the task that was carried out during that travel.
To make things manageable we would like to know about interests in the 36 months before the
declaration and those known to be going to occur during the next 12 months.
2. How we categorise declaration of interests
We categorise declaration of interests into four main areas:
2.1 Personal financial interests
A personal financial interest is considered present when payments are made directly to an individual,whether as a salary or as fees or honorariums; or where an individual receives benefits from a thirdparty who is not their main employer, such as a fellowship, equipment, writing or administrativeassistance, or travel and accommodation expenses; or where an individual owns stocks and shares,patents, or other assets.
Examples include: Employment Paid consultancy or directorshipOwnership of stocks and sharesPatent ownership or applications Paid membership of speakers panels/bureaus and advisory board
Acting as an expert witness Being in receipt of a fellowship, equipment, writing, or administrative support Travel and accommodation expenses Writing or consulting for a medical education promotional or communicationscompany.
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
17/21
2
We do not consider personal financial interests to be present in the case of assets over whichindividuals have no control, such as unit trusts, occupational pension funds, and accrued pensionrights.
2.2 Organisational financial interests
An organisational financial interest is said to exist where the interest belongs at arm ’s length to theindividual—for example, where payments are made to the individual's organisation rather than to theirown bank account.
Examples include: Research grantsFunds for staff or department
2.3 Non-financial interests
Non-financial interests can take many different forms, including personal or professional relations withorganisations and individuals. Those that we want people to declare are unpaid positions that mighthave a bearing on the product or service being delivered by BMJ. We would also want to know aboutstrongly held beliefs where they are relevant to the task in hand.
In addition, we encourage people to declare other personal interests that they consider may be aconflict of interest in the context of the task they are being asked to perform for BMJ.
Examples include: Unpaid officership of advocacy, charity, non-governmental organisation, orrelevant professional groupUnpaid membership of a guidelines panelUnpaid advisory positions in commercial organisationsPersonal relationships with authors or editors of material, including havingheld grants, co-authored articles or papers, or worked together.
2.4 Interests of related parties
Conflicts of interest may also arise where a related party (spouse, partner, or other close familymember) has a financial or non-financial interest as described above that could be seen to conflictwith the task a person is being asked to do for BMJ.
Examples include: A spouse holding stocks or shares or being on the board of an organisationthat might be affected by the task the person is doing for BMJ.
3. When will you be asked to make declarations of interest?
We expect people to declare their interests before taking up any work for BMJ or entering into acontract with us for your services.
Where we are recruiting new staff, a declaration of interests will be part of the job application.
If we invite you to join an advisory board, or commission an article, lecture, or peer review report fromyou, we will ask you to declare your interests at the first approach in case there are conflicts ofinterest that preclude you from accepting the invitation.
Articles submitted for consideration must be accompanied by a completed declaration.
BMJ staff and members of advisory boards will be asked to review their declarations of interestsannually (for staff this will be at the time of appraisal).
4. Dealing with declarations of interest
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
18/21
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
19/21
4
BMJ Group declaration of interests statement
Please complete the declaration below. You may complete and return this form electronically in Wordformat —a physical signature/hard copy is not required.
I have read and understood the BMJ Group policy on declaration of interests and declare thefollowing interests: [list them or state “none” ] .
None
Name: Jayne Woodside Date: 23/11/15
Manager sign off (for internal use)
Comments:
Review date
Name: Date:
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
20/21
5
[For internal use]
Guidance on how to apply the BMJ Group declaration of interestspolicy
This policy applies to people involved in the conception and creation of content and services ormaking major business decisions on that content or services
Who is responsible for getting the declaration of interests?
1) Products and services (boards and advisors): the editorial director of the product of service, or hisor her delegate
2) Content or events (authors, speakers and reviewers): the commissioning/handling editor
3) Advice: the person getting the advice (e.g. an editor)
4) Staff: HR is responsible for getting declaration of interests when a new staff member arrives andthe line manager is responsible for existing staff. Staff will be told to read the policy and (in line withthe Business ethics policy) to inform their manager at any time if they have any personal interestwhich might affect, could be seen to affect or leave them open to allegations that this could affect their
impartiality about the work they are doing.
How/when will the declaration be obtained?
1) Product or service—at the time of convening of boards and advisory groups, and when newmembers are recruited2) Content or event—at commissioning or (for research and other unsolicited content) at submission3) Advice—on requesting the advice4) Staff —as part of their application for the job.
What should be done with the information?
The person responsible for getting/receiving/using the information provided in the declaration should
ask themselves: does anything in this declaration compromise the person’s ability to do the task thatneeds doing—or could be perceived as compromising this. If the answer is yes or possibly, theresponsible person should discuss it with their line manager or other appropriate person. Practicesmay differ between products and department – the point is that there should be some discussionabout this before a decision is made and there should be some documentation of the decision, thedecision making process, and the reasons for the decision.
What constitutes “a conflict of interest too f ar” will differ according to the task the person is beingasked to do. As far as possible the types of interest that we have agreed constitute a “conflict ofinterest too f ar” will be listed within the quality indicators for individual products and services. At aGroup level they would be anything that interferes with the unbiased output of the BMJ Group. This islikely to occur if the person declares a current financial relationships or contractual arrangements thatappear to prevent him or her from providing an unbiased expert judgement, e.g. where a person has
signed a contract in which he or she agrees to be paid for advocating the opinion of that organisationor company, or where he or she is in receipt of significant personal financial benefits.
Where will the declaration be published?
1) Product or service—on the relevant website2) Content or event—alongside each article/module or at the beginning of each talk3) Advice—to those receiving the advice (e.g. to authors and editors in the case of reviews)4) Staff —to line managers and department heads, and on the relevant website for staff makingeditorial or business decisions (generally staff in grade 4 or above).
How often should declarations be reviewed?
1) Product or service—annually2) Content or event—for content that is formally updated: at every updating
8/18/2019 Jayne Woodside PhD / Bonnie Liebman's October 31, 2015 email petition to retract an investigation by journalist N…
21/21
6
3) Advice—at least annually for on-going advisors. (For advisors who sit on boards or committeesupdating declarations should be an agenda item at committee meetings at appropriate intervals, butshould be considered formally at least annually)
4) Staff —at every annual appraisal. Staff have an obligation to tell their manager at any time if theinformation changes.
What happens if a person fails to make a full declaration of interests?
If we are alerted to the fact that someone may have an undeclared and potentially conflicting interest,this will almost always require careful handling. The first step is almost always to raise the concernwith the person involved and ask if the conflict does exist and for their reasons for not declaring it.Based on their response various actions may follow. Their declaration of interests may simply need tobe updated or a clarification notice or response published. Where a conflict is substantial and risks theintegrity of the content, product, or service, the person is likely to have to be removed fromundertaking the relevant task and articles or other content they have been working on may need to beretracted. Such cases must be discussed with senior staff (the line manager in the first instance) andrecords kept of all decision making.
When documenting the decision making process care should be taken to only record the facts of thecase under review and to avoid any speculation or making any personal comments about a person’sdeclaration of interests.
FG, LD, RM December 2012