Upload
constance-chrystal-hill
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
ILC Positron TDR and R&D Meeting 1: Oxford
ILC GDE Activities Updateand
Undulator Scheme Status
J. C. Sheppard
SLAC
September 27, 2006
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
December, 2005: Undulator Baseline Documentation – BCD
March, 2006: RDR Configuration: the undulator scheme
April, 2006: RDR Parts Inventory to Technical Systems for Costing July, 2006: RDR Preliminary Costing Results (the Big Secret)
August-September, 2006: Cost comparisons between undulator and conventional schemes; central Injector layouts and initial costing activities.
September, 2006 GDE Decision: Undulator Scheme and Central Injector
Undulator Scheme
ILC GDE Activities Update, to date
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
September, 2006: RDR Text Outlines (N. Phinney editor)
November, 2006: Valencia Meeting: RDR Text and Costs (???? rumors of short delay with appropriate rescoping of RDR deliverables….)15 pages for undulator scheme; not clear how alternatives are being handled
Undulator Scheme
ILC GDE Activities Update, thru end of calendar 2006
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Layout of ILC Positron Source: December, 2005
e- sourcee-
DR
e- Dump Photon Dump
e+
DRAuxiliary e- Source
Photon Collimators
Optical Matching
Device
e+ pre-accelerator ~5GeV
150 GeV 100 GeV
HelicalUndulatorIn By-Pass
Line
PhotonTarget
250 GeV
Positron Linac
IP
Beam Delivery System
e- Target
Optical Matching
Device
e- Dump
Photon production at 150 GeV electron energyK=1, =1 cm, 100 m long helical undulatorTwo e+ production stations (1 as backup) + KASPulsed OMD (shielded target)Keep alive auxiliary source is e+ sideTiming Insert and Trombone in PML Extension
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Positron System Site Layout: July 2006
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Positron System Site Layout Discussions: September, 2006
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Positron System Site Layout Discussions: September, 2006Central Injector Discussions:
Electron dr and a single positron dr in a single tunnel located at the center of the ILC site
Two 14 mrad crossing angle IPs at a different elevation (~10-20 m) from dr’s
Positron production still at 150 GeV point in electron main linac
e+ transport line reduced from 18.7 km to about 5 km
Removal of timing insert (still need to do correct timing) and 2nd IP trombone
Looking at feasibility to use e- source to make 500 MeV KAS drive electron beam
Cost reductions thru hardware reduction
~30 km of low emittance, damped beam added to RTML systems
Ongoing discussions that have lives of their own
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Positron System Site Layout Discussions: September, 2006
Impact to ongoing work for ILC Undulator Scheme:
No real changes to the technical challenges
No parameter changes
Reduction of transport lines
Rework of injection/extraction schemes
Still have same technical challenges and cost drivers
Work continues
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Abstract:Detailed positron systems designs and documentation are required for the ILC TDR by the end of FY09. The goal of the research and development for the ILC positron systems is to learn enough about the component and subsystem technical requirements such that the scope of the resource requests in the TDR are adequate and not excessive. Included in the R&D list are key enabling technologies. Detailed systems integration, design, and engineering for manufacture are not considered herein. Fabrication of production prototypes is to be done as part of the construction phase of the project.
Undulator Scheme
ILC Positron System Design and R&D Goals in Support of the TDR
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
R&D Tasks:UndulatorOMD/Flux ConcentratorTarget StationRemote HandlingPhoton Collimation and StopsPositron StabilizationCapture RF SystemsFast Ion Instabilities
Documentation:TDR
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: Undulator
Demonstration of undulator performance with a standard module:
Up to 200 m of helical undulator with K=1, = 1 cm, and inner diameter > 6 mm is required. The undulator is a superconducting magnet design and is made from modules which are 2-4 m in length. The goal is this task is to select a technology (Nb-Ti or Nb-Sn), specify the performance characteristics (K value, aperture, length, tolerance), build and measure the performance of a prototype magnet. A beam test may not be required.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: OMD/Flux Concentrator
A viable OMD: pulsed/shielded and or dc/immersed:
A strong (~7T), axial magnetic field at the exit of the conversion target is required for efficient capture of positrons. The device is called the optical matching device (OMD) and serves essentially as a point to parallel focusing element. Two candidate technologies are presently under consideration: a pulsed flux concentrator and a superconducting coil. In the former case, the magnet filed rises rapidly (~5mm) from zero to full strength immediately downstream of the target. In the latter case, the coil sits upstream of the target and the field penetrates the target. It is likely that a pulsed device can be based on previous designs which need to be improved for reliability. If the issues associated with spinning the conversion target in a strong magnet field can be successfully handled, the immersion of the target in the field offers an improvement in positron capture efficiency by as much as 40% over that possible with the field profile of the flux concentrator. Because of the uncertainties in both candidates, it is recommended that both technologies be studies and developed.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: Target Station
Rotating target assembly compatible with OMD choice: The positron conversion target is a 1 m diameter annulus which spins at
about 2000 rpm. Approximately 30 kW of average power deposited by the beam and perhaps a similar amount of power due to eddy currents from the OMD must be removed. The goal of this project is to develop a prototype water cooled, spinning target and to test the performance of the system along with a functioning OMD as chosen in task 2.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: Remote Handling
Remote handling strategy and task descriptions:
The beam power in the ILC positron vault is in the range of 350 kW. The target and much of the downstream accelerator components and ancillary infrastructure will become activated. To facilitate maintenance and repair, it is necessary to develop remote handling techniques and systems for this area. It is likely that much of what is required can be adapted from facilities which have similar issues, such as the SNS, ISIS, various hot cell facilities, and perhaps reactor installations. It is recommended that existing remote handling facilities and techniques be studied for application and unique needs for the ILC positron vault be identified. A strategy for remote handling must be developed and a design for this capability needs to be developed and fully integrated into the positron system. A simulation of component and vault dose and activation is required.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: Photon Stops and Collimation
Photon stops and photon collimation:
Positron polarization can be enhanced by collimating the incident gamma beam. Some designs call for cutting as much as 50% of the incident photons which corresponds to an average power of up to 175 kW. As a separate issue, it is necessary to collimate large angle gammas along the length of the undulator to prevent unwanted energy deposition along the undulator. While the power levels are reduced from that of the main photon collimator, the spectrum of the photons is similar to those absorbed by the main collimator. The goal of this research is to develop the photon collimator and photon stops, prototyping and testing as necessary.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: Positron Stabilization
Stabilization schemes: intensity control, fault recovery:
Positron intensity fluctuations arise from variations in the drive electron beam intensity as well as due to drift and jitter in the positron system itself. The goal of this task is to identify all potential sources of intensity jitter, invent solutions and work arounds, and to develop hardware as necessary.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: NC RF
Normal conducting structure demonstration of achievable gradient and power handling capability:
(separate presentation if time permits or will add to meeting notes)
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: Fast Ion Instability
Fast ion instability mitigation in undulator, as required:
(Expect this to be resolved in FY07; presently have a vacuum specification of 100 nTorr which is under discussion)
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Tasks: TDR Development
Positron System Design and Optimization:
Positron accelerator system design and optimization studies. The goal of this task is to produce the positron system documentation required for the ILC TDR. This goal includes complete specifications for all aspects of the positron system and full integration with the ILC.
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas Region
Challenge:
The foregoing need better definition in terms of work packages; need to do what is required for the TDR, need to push off what can not be accomplished into construction.
Need to avoid duplication if possible
Need to run in parallel as needed
Important to develop and implement a global entrerprise
Undulator Scheme
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas RegionUndulator Scheme
FY07 FY08 Comments
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Undulator Assume K=1,=1 cm, helical
Specifications • • • • Explore parameter space
Short Sam ple • • • develop short sample
Prototype • • • • • • • • develop full length engineered module
OMD/Flux Contentrator Baseline pulsed device
Im m ersed Target Des ign • • • • • • • • • • • • eddy current simulations and test
Pulsed Flux Concentrator • • • • identify engineering issues
Prototype • • • • • • • • • demonstrate performance
Target Station 1 m dia TiAlV w heel@2000 rpm w / OMD
Engineering Des ign • • • • identify engineering issues
Target Prototype • • • • • • • • build and test
Target Tes ting • • • • • • test w / OMD w /o beam
Remote Handling Scheduled maintenance 3 m/yr
Specification • • • determine requirements
Straw Des ign • • • • develop candiate solutions
Review • • cost and ref ine
Photon Collimator and Stops Polarization enhancement, undulator vacuum
Specification • • • • decide on requirements and benef its
Des ign • • • • identify issues
Prototype as necessary • • • • as required by engineering uncertainty
FY09
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC
Americas RegionUndulator Scheme
FY07 FY08 Comments
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Positron Stabilization Improve ILC operational stability
Specification • • • • delimit problem and solutions
Develop and test as necessary • • • • modeling, simulations, component definition
Laser Compton Needs to show viability
Accelerator System Definition • • • • delimit problem and solutions
Develop and test as necessary • • • • • • • • laser and optical cavity development
Technical Design Report Due end of Q2 FY09
TDR development • • • • • • • • • • • • Q2 FY09
Start to end simulations • • • • • • • • • • • • full TDR scope, component specs, perf simu
Civil • • • • • • • • • • • • specify and review
Sys. Engr. And Design • • • • • • • • • • • • 30% Design for TDR
Coordination • • • • • • • • • • • • Overall integration
FY09