8
JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

JEAN-LUC STALON

DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG

UNDP, PAKISTAN

Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Page 2: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Salient Features

Compiled around 8 priority sectors and 4 cross-cutting themes

Prepared by the Sector Working Groups and Thematic Groups and finalised by NDMA

Total Financial Gap US$ 571.1 million

Being discussed with the GoP for finalisation

Page 3: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Prioritisation Criteria

Relevance to Early Recovery, precluding relief, reconstruction and development

Focus on the worst affected areas Targeting the most vulnerable sections

of the affected population The physical and human implementation

capacity available nationally Practicability for implementation till the

end of 2011

Page 4: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Comparison of the Quantum of Funding Gaps in Prioritised Sectors and Themes

Page 5: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Comparison between Flash Appeal and Strategic ER Action Plan

Page 6: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Indicative Province/ Region wise Break up of Financial Gap (US$ million)

Page 7: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Snapshot for Gap Analysis in AgricultureAggregate Early Recovery NeedsTotal Intended Households: 3,087,000Total funds needed: US$ 473 m

Aggregate Early Recovery ResponseHouseholds provided with Assistance: 293,000Funds spent/ Committed/in hard pipeline: US$ 39.4 m

Balochistan105,400 HHs

KP682,700 HHs

Sindh1,317,000 HHs

Punjab773,000 HHs

Balochistan12,000 HHs

KP77,000 HHs

Sindh134,000 HHs

Punjab70,000 HHs

Aggregate Gap Identification3.087 m households requiring US$ 473 m for full-fledged Early Recovery0.433 m households in urgent need of additional US$ 79 m

BalochistanBeneficiaries (HHs): 15,872Prioritised Cost: US$ 3 m

KPBeneficiaries(HHs): 102,809Prioritised Cost: US$ 19 m

SindhBeneficiaries (HHs): 198,329Prioritised Cost: US$ 36 m

PunjabBeneficiaries (HHs): 116,407Prioritised Cost: US$ 21 m

ChallengesDonors’ commitment at the early stages of Early Recovery is critical for the restoration of livelihoods Some districts of Sindh and Balochistan remained inundated after the floods which made the

efficiency for irrigated agriculture for the 2011 Kharif cropping season risky Indebtedness in flood-affected areas, so income generation activities should be focused Lack of long term institutional arrangements between line departments in flood affected provinces

Response StrategyFirst Priority Area: Five districts of Sindh and one of Balochistan still severely inundated by flood waters in November, 10 not able to plant a 2010/2011 Rabi cropSecond Priority Area: Districts of Kashmir, KP, Punjab and additional districts of Balochistan and Sindh not able to plan a 2010/2011 Rabi cropThird Priority Area: Rehabilitation of FMWCs in all severely flood affected districts of Kashmir, KP, Punjab, Balochistan and SindhFourth Priority Area: Livelihood restoration of small farmers in all severely affected districts of Kashmir, KP, Punjab, Balochistan and Sindh

Page 8: JEAN-LUC STALON DEPUTY COUNTRY DIRECTOR (PROGRAMME)/ CO-CHAIR ERWG UNDP, PAKISTAN Strategic Early Recovery Action Plan – at a glance

Snapshot for Gap Analysis in HousingAggregate Early Recovery NeedsTotal required Houses: 827,380*Total funds needed: US$ 636 million

Aggregate Early Recovery ResponseHouses/Shelters provided: 351,980*Funds spent or in hard pipeline: US$ 271 million

Balochistan59,484

KP116,866

Sindh346,942

Punjab301,211

Balochistan40,683

KP77,420

Sindh109,620

Punjab70,000 HHs

Prioritised Aggregate Gap Identification227,050 houses requiring additional US$ 175 million (prioritised on the basis of location-based vulnerability)*Includes figures for GB and PAK

BalochistanHouses: 11,500Cost: US$ 8.8 million

KPHouses: 18,572Cost: US$ 14.3 million

SindhHouses: 111,736Cost: US$ 85.9 million

PunjabHouses: 85,243Cost: US$ 65.6 million

ChallengesThe upcoming season can hinder the construction process and the monsoon rains can cause further destruction and disrupt reconstruction activities To ensure that the commitments are actualized, that parity among the provinces in terms of commitment of the ORS is reached, and that not-registered activities also follow technical guidelines to enable “build back better”. Local resources to rebuild are limited and knowledge on how to rebuild better against the risks of floods and earthquakes is not widely disseminatedTo ensure all IDPs affected by the floods, living in temporary conditions such as camps and secondary settlements, return to their places of origin

Response StrategyOnly completely destroyed (CD) houses are being targeted to provide support to people without permanent shelter A household with a destroyed house shall be supported with an approx. 20 sq.m large One Room Shelter as a first Early Recovery core room, which will be later extended towards a houseThe Transitional Shelters that do not comply with DRR shall not be promoted or supported.Early Recovery shall be cost efficient by applying well known construction methods and the use of local materials. To promote ownership and to lower costs, beneficiaries shall participate according to their capacity. All material and labour shall be provided to extremely vulnerable households