5

people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 2: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 3: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 4: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,
Page 5: people.trentu.cajebowman/Bowman2000.pdf · 246 MAMMALIA al were -0.27 for botfly sites and 0.78 for non-botfly sites. The discriminant function clas- sified 70% of cases correctly,