Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jerry Yanz, PhD
Director of Audiology
Hansaton Acoustics
www.hansaton-usa.com
[Photo of
Presenter]
Nature of innovation
Technology adoption and your own stripes
Evaluating and adopting hearing technology
Disruptive Innovation – Threat or Opportunity?
Discussion
These presentations slides will be available
to download at ihsinfo.org/convention
INNOVATIONS
Continuous
Gradual upgrading of
existing products
Does not require
practitioners to learn or do anything different
Discontinuous
Big change in how things
are done
Must change our current
mode of behavior or Modify goods or services
we rely on
“Never before in history has innovation offered promise of so much to so many in so short a time.” Bill Gates
Innovators
Early
Adopters
Early
Majority
Late
Majority
Laggards
Time
Ma
rket P
enetr
ation
Everett Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 1962, 1983
Geoffrey Moore, Crossing the Chasm, 2002
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFECYCLE MODEL
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
Innovators
Pursue new technology products aggressively
Seek them out before market launch
Technology a central interest in their lives
Intrigued with any fundamental advance
Forgive high prices, omissions in functionality,
poor performance, just to see how the new
technology works
Small group, but their endorsement and input
are key
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
Early Adopters
Buy in early, but not technologists
Easy for them to imagine, understand, appreciate
benefits of new technology
Visionaries who can match emerging technology to
strategic opportunities
When they find a strong match, they buy accordingly
Rely more on their own intuition than on well-
established references
Key to opening up high-tech market segment
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
Early Majority
Relate to technology, but driven more by practicality
Know the potential pitfalls of new gadgets
Content to wait and see how others are doing
Want to see well-established references
Large group, key to substantial growth
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
Late Majority
Share concerns of Early Majority, but…
Not comfortable in their ability to handle new
technology
Wait for product to become an accepted standard
Want lots of support, so they buy from large, well-
established companies
Large group, important revenue center
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
Laggards
Want nothing to do with new technology
They’ll buy it if they don’t have to see it
Generally not worth pursuing, but…
Purveyors of high tech can learn from them
Point out discrepancies between promises and
realities
DATA COLLECTION
Where do you fall on the
technology adoption
continuum?
Innovators
Early
Adopters
Early
Majority
Late
Majority
Laggards
Innovators
Early
Adopters
Early
Majority
Late
Majority
Laggards
Moore, Crossing the Chasm, 2002
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
“Innovation is the ability to see change as an opportunity - not a threat.”
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
Time
INNOVATION P
erf
orm
an
ce
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
INNOVATION
• How useful?
• How easy to use?
“Every innovation occasions more harm and derangement of order by its novelty, than benefit by its abstract utility.”
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
INNOVATION
Retooling
Notch
• How useful?
• How easy to use?
• Time and hassle
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
Retooling
Notch
“It would be a terrific innovation if you could get your mind to stretch a little further than the next wisecrack.” Katharine Hepburn
Usefulness – performance change
Ease of use or implementation – retooling notch
Attitudes toward innovation
Innovator
Early adopter
Early majority
Late majority
Laggard
Programmable analog
Digital signal processing
Wireless
Rechargeables
Usefulness
Ease of use
Performance change
Retooling
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
L
L
M
S
S
M
0
Prog analog
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Percen
t o
f To
tal S
ale
s
Quarterly Analog Programmable Sales
HIA Reports
INNOVATION: PROGRAMMABLE ANALOG
Usefulness
Ease of use
Performance change
Retooling
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
L
L
M
S
S
M
0
Prog analog
Prog digital
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Pe
rce
nt
of
To
tal
Sa
les
Quarterly Digital Sales
HIA Reports
PROGRAMMABLE ANALOG & DIGITAL
Quarterly Sales
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 1
997
Q1 1
998
Q1 1
999
Q1 2
000
Q1 2
001
Q1 2
002
Q1 2
003
Q1 2
004
Q1 2
005
Q1 2
006
Q1 2
007
Q1 2
008
Pe
rc
en
t o
f T
ota
l S
ale
s
Analog
Digital
HIA Reports
Usefulness
Ease of use
Performance change
Retooling notch
FIRST PERSONAL AUDIO LINK?
1966
Uhura Chief Communications
Officer
Starship Enterprise
Phonak SmartLink Starkey ELI
FIRST BLUETOOTH DEVICES FOR HOH (2005)
Innovators
Early
Adopters
Early
Majority
Late
Majority
Laggards
Moore, Crossing the Chasm, 2002
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION LIFE CYCLE
Cell phone
Media XTR Music
TV
Hardwired Bluetooth
NFMI Media XTR
Telephone
3rd party BT
FM via DAI
Loop system
Induction FM
Church
Restaurant
Bedroom TV
miniMedia
Remote
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
L
L
M
S
S
M
0
Prog analog
Prog digital
Wireless
Usefulness
Ease of use
Performance change
Retooling notch
What rechargeable
devices do you use?
Convenience
Environmental benefit
Cost
Handling
Counseling time
Operating time per charge Memory issues Battery longevity Charging errors
Wrong battery Inverted battery
Handling Worn contacts Counseling time Need for power source
SECONDARY (RECHARGEABLE) CELLS
• Operating time
• Custom
• RIC & BTE
• Time to charge
• Battery longevity
• Ease of use
……………………………5 years
…………………………..4-6 hours
…………….20-30 hours per charge
…………..20+ hours per charge
……….…….Never touch a battery
RECHARGEABLE IMPROVEMENTS
Convenience
Environmental benefit
Cost
Handling
Counseling time
Operating time per charge Memory issues Battery longevity Charging errors
Wrong battery Inverted battery
Handling Worn contacts Counseling time Need for power source
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
L
L
M
S
S
M
0
Prog analog
Prog digital
Wireless
Rechargeable
Time
Pe
rfo
rma
nc
e
Continuous
Discontinuous
Disruptive
• Not as good as the current leader
• But…
• Less expensive
• Easily accessible
• Threatens to scoop the market
Examples
• Distance communication
• Computers
• Shopping
• Health care
• Hearing care?
• Insurance companies
• Internet sales
• Over the counter
• PSAPs
• Self-programming instruments
• Telehealth
• Automated hearing tests
• Online hearing tests
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT DISRUPTIVE INNOVATIONS?
REFERENCES
Christensen CM, Grossman JH and Hwang J. The
Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2009.
Moore GA. Crossing the Chasm. Harper Collins, New York,
NY, 2006.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press of Glencoe,
Glencoe, IL,1962.
Yanz JL and Preves DA. Assessing the feasibility of Bluetooth
in hearing rehabilitation. Hearing Journal 60:11, 2007, 52-60.
Yanz JL. Benefits and challenges of wireless technology.
Audiology Practices 1:3, 2009, 26-32.
Yanz JL, Ellesser J, Kaempf H. Bringing rechargeable
hearing aids into the mainstream market.
HearingReview.com, January, 2012, 28-30.
These presentations slides will be available to download at
ihsinfo.org/convention
Please complete
an Evaluation Form for this seminar
Contact Jerry Yanz at
Visit www.hansaton-usa.com
These presentations slides will be available
to download at ihsinfo.org/convention
To be eligible for CE credit
Be sure to get your IHS Attendance Record page from
your directory hole-punched as you exit!