View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jesus Benhumea
Kevin StokelyMatt Aggleton
Advisor: Dr. Scott Franklin
Jamming in 2-D Prolate Granular Material Systems.
*Petroleum Research Fund #39132-GB9
Background
• Prolate particles are characterized by large aspect ratio ( = L/W > 10)
– Piles are much more rigid than ordinary granular materials
• Jamming: To cause (moving parts, for example) to lock into an unworkable position
– Oil industry– Farming– Manufacturers of items such as Nails, pens, etc..– Timber Industry– Anywhere prolate granular materials are found
• What Triggers Jamming to occur more frequently?
Experimental Setup
• 2-D flat surface • Dimensions 12”x20”• Square Brass Rods 2.5” X .125” = 20• Packing fraction = Area of rods/ Total Area
• The rods are laid and spread out by hand• An initial image is taken and analyzed to ensure
randomness and isotropy
Angular Distribution
What Are we are Looking for
• Total number of Particles that are disturbed in a run?
• How far ahead, above, and below does the disturbance reach?
• How many particles are pushed off the plate?
• What force is felt by the probe from the particles?
• We Subtract Images to determine which rods have moved.
• Bright Spots Indicate Disturbance
Video Analysis
• More particles lead to more moving in disturbance
Total Disturbance
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
Packing Fraction
Arb
. Un
its
• Motion of Particles ahead of the Dot
Disturbance Ahead Of the Dot
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
Packing Fraction
Ro
d L
en
gth
• Motion of particles above and below the dot.
Disturbance Above the dot
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4Packing Fraction
Ro
d L
eng
th
• Rods pushed off of the plate.
Rods Pushed off Plate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
Packing Fraction
# o
f ro
ds
off