Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Looking Ahead to Understand How to Design up to 6.25 Gb/s InterconnectsJohn D’AmbrosiaTyco Electronics
2© 2005
Channel Response
Hc(f)
s(t) r(t)Signal
Conditioning
Transmitter
Receive
Equalization
Receiver
The Active Interconnect
3© 2005
Industry Channel Models
4© 2005
The Connector / Board Interface
connector pin
layer connection
“TOP” layer connection
“BOTTOM” layer connection
5© 2005
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Frequency (GHz)
Sdd2
1 (d
B)
Sdd21 XAUI 4000-6 Top XAUI 4000-6 Bottom
17" Rogers Backplane Counterbored3" per FR4 Line Card, 12 mil traces on both
16" 4000-6 Backplane Bottom Layer2" per 4000-2 Line Card
16" 4000-6 Backplane Top Layer 2" per 4000-2 Line Card
$$
To improve
$$
Competitive Pressures
Legacy s. Greenfield
6© 2005
Length Analysis in Backplanes
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Backplane 1
Backplane 2
Backplane 3
Backplane 4
Backplane 5
Backplane 6
Backplane 7
Backplane 8
Backplane 9
Backplane 10
Backplane 11
Diff
eren
t bac
kpla
nes
Number of Differential Pairs
41-47"36-40.99"31-35.99"26-30.99"21-25.99"16-20.99"11-15.99"6-10.99"Under 6"
6" to 10.99"30%
Under 6"45%
11 - 15.99"19%
16 - 20.99"6%
7© 2005
The Big QuestionHow can the performance of the active interconnect be optimized, while maximizing density / reliability / manufacturability at the lowest cost and lowest power?
The application and its economics dictate the channel!
8© 2005
Using Pulse Responses
Legacy 6x6 16 OutC0
Note increase in pre-cursor contribution
Note decrease in amplitude and shift in sampling point in relation to peak
9© 2005
Normalizing a Pulse Response
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Gb/s3.125 Gb/s6.25 Gb/s10 Gb/s
Legacy 6x6 16 OutC0Note – all cursors normalized to amplitude at t(0). t(0) is chosen as the mid point in time between the 50% edge transitions.
10© 2005
Standard
4 layers
QuadRoute
2 layers
+72%Med≈ .225”36Std Route Design
-6.6%Low ≈ .125”20Quad Route Design
Option 1 (Nelco N4000-13SI)
+16%Med≈ .225”36Std Route Design
-34%Low ≈ .125”20Quad Route Design
Option 1 (Nelco N4000-13)
BaselineMed≈ .225”36Std Route Design
-Low ≈ .125”20Quad Route Design
* Relative ∆ %
Tech LevelThickness# of
LayersOption 1
(Nelco N4000-6)
+72%Med≈ .225”36Std Route Design
-6.6%Low ≈ .125”20Quad Route Design
Option 1 (Nelco N4000-13SI)
+16%Med≈ .225”36Std Route Design
-34%Low ≈ .125”20Quad Route Design
Option 1 (Nelco N4000-13)
BaselineMed≈ .225”36Std Route Design
-Low ≈ .125”20Quad Route Design
* Relative ∆ %
Tech LevelThickness# of
LayersOption 1
(Nelco N4000-6)
For a full mesh ATCA backplane
Using HM-Zd
11© 2005
IEEE 802.3ap 10G BackplaneReference Model
12© 2005
• 10.3125 Gb/s, 28” Topology (6”LC, 16”BP)
• Legacy Backplane
• Decrease in max amplitude
• Increase in pre-cursor
• QuadRoute Backplane
• Max amplitude similar
• Pre-cursor similar
Using Pulse Responses (TP1 – TP4 only)
13© 2005
Conceptual Observations
SDD21 (dB)
Frequency
Too much loss Signal attenuated increasing impact of noise / reflections
Manageable balance
Potential for increase in xtalk and reflections
14© 2005
Review of Tyco Channels Provided to IEEE 802.3ap
Length Material Length Material StubChannel ModelTyco - Data to be available within 2 to 3 weeksMargin Test Case
Tyco - Data is available.
Margin Test Case
Tyco - Data is available.
ATCA Full Mesh
Tyco - Data is available.
ATCA Dual Star
Tyco - Data is available.
ATCA Dual Star
Tyco - Data is available.
Adjacent Slot
Tyco - Data is available.
CommentsTotal Length
NOTE: Data for all test cases includes dominant, adjacent NEXT and FEXT aggressors.
13" (330mm)
1" (25mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
Near Top-Layer (with
stub)
40" (1016mm)
40" (1016mm)
40" (1016mm)
32" (812mm)
22" (558mm)
22" (558mm)
7 6" (152mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
10" (254mm)
Nelco 4000-13
Bottom (or counter-boring)
6 6" (152mm)
Nelco 4000-13
10" (254mm)
Nelco 4000-13
Top Layer (with stub)
5 6" (152mm)
Nelco 4000-13
20" (508mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
Bottom (or counter-boring)
4 6" (152mm)
Nelco 4000-13
20" (508mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
Bottom (or counter-boring)
3 10" (254mm)
Nelco 4000-6
20" (508mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
Bottom (or counter-boring)
2 10" (254mm)
Nelco 4000-13
20" (508mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
Bottom (or counter-boring)
1 10" (254mm)
Nelco 4000-13SI
Line Card BackplaneTest Case
Tyco – Data is available.
NOTE – A full mesh ATCA backplane and a dual-star ATCA backplane from independent vendors was used. Neither backplane was optimized for 10 Gb/s operation.
15© 2005
SDD11 and Impact of Line Card Length (6 and 10 Inches)
LC Bot / BP Bot
16© 2005
NEXT and Throughput for Different Daughter card Lengths
17© 2005
FEXT vs. System Length
Note increase in FEXT as channel length decreases
Case 2 – 40”
Case 4 – 32”
Case 7 – 13”
18© 2005
HM-Zd XAUI Interoperability Platform20 Inch Channel
Data Source – Courtesy of Agere Systems, “The Impact of Environmental Conditions on Channel Performance,” John D’Ambrosia, Greg Sheets, DesignCon 2004.
19© 2005
Pulse Responses and Environmental Variance
5.15625 Gbits/s
10.3125 Gbits/s
Data Source – Courtesy of Agere Systems, “The Impact of Environmental Conditions on Channel Performance,” John D’Ambrosia, Greg Sheets, DesignCon 2004.
Decrease in t(0) amplitudeIncreases impact of post cursors
Increase in pre-cursor contribution, further complicated by reduction in t(0)
Change in timing
20© 2005
Return Loss Interacts with Device Terminations
Perfect chip RL
Modeling chip RL as RC to the –8dB spec
21© 2005
ConclusionsTime / Frequency Domain – Use Both!Design for the Backplane not a single case− Different cases have different problems
The application dictates the channelAs you go faster, energy spreads into adjacent bits− Pre-cursor can become more critical
Channel performance is the summation of− Loss− Return loss− NEXT− FEXT
Attenuation is not bad, but it needs managementEnvironmental influenceDevice terminations can cause further problemsConsider the System!