JOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES

JOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES(1051315 ONTARIO LIMITED)

1279 Ingledene Drive. Oakville Ontario L6H2J1 Tel: (905) 844-0220 Fax: (905)844-2008

32D05SW0060 2 16430 MORRISETTE010

TECHNICAL REVIEW

AND

ASSESSMENT WORK REPORT

ON THE

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP PROPERTY

KIRKLAND LAKE AREA, ONTARIO

DECEMBER 31,1995

MINING

o00

R E C E -ED

Kirkland Lake District Larder Lake Mining Division NTS 32D/4 S 32D/5 790 54'W long., 480 15'N lat.

John P. Thompson M.Se., P.En

32D05SW0060 2 16430 MORRISETTE ^ * ~

TECHNICAL REVIEWAND ASSESSMENT WORK REPORT

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP PROPERTYKIRKLAND LAKE AREA, ONTARIO

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 4

3.0 PROPERTY STATUS ............................................................ 53.1 Claims3.2 Ownership3.3 Location3.4 Access3.5 Climate, Topography Z Vegetation3.6 Infrastructure

4.0 HISTORY OF THE AREA ..................................................... 8

5.0 GEOLOGY ............................................................................. 125.1 Regional Geology5.2 Local Geology5.3 Mineralization

6.0 RECENTWORK ................................................................... 196.1 General Remarks6.2 1994 Work Program

6.21 Geological Survey6.22 B Zone Soil Survey6.23 Till Survey

6.3 1995 Work Program6.31 Grid Extension6.32 VLF EM-16 Survey6.33 Magnetometer Survey6.34 IP Survey

7.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................... 26

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 28

REFERENCESCERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

TECHNICAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT WORK REPORT

ON THEMORRISETTE TOWNSHIP PROPERTY


Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: Figure 7: Figure 8: Figure 9: Figure 10: Figure 11: Figure 12:

Figure 13: Figure 14:

Table 1: Table 2:

Table 3: Table 4:

LIST OF FIGURES

Location MapClaim MapKimberlites, Alkaline Mafic IntrusionsSummary of KLIP Program DataGeology of the Abitibi Greenstone BeltGeology Map of the Timmins - Kirkland Lake AreaGeology Map East Half Morrisette TownshipGeophysical Map East Half Morrisette TownshipCompilation Map East Half Morrisette TownshipGeology b Geochemistry, North Part Morrisette Twp. PropertyGeology Map, SE Corner Morrisette Twp. PropertyAirborne Geophysical Compilation Map, North Part, MorrisetteTwp. PropertyInterpretation of Ground IP and VLFGround Magnetic Contour Map

LIST OF TABLES

Land Holdings TableSummary of documented kimberlite occurrences in theKirkland Lake resident geologists district.Gold Grain Summary SheetKimberlite Indicator Mineral Counts

Appendix l: Appendix II: Appendix III: Appendix IV: Appendix V: Appendix VI:

APPENDICES

Soil and Rock Analysis CertificatesTill Sampling Observation SheetsReport on Till AnalysesList of Contractors/Consultants 1994List of Contractors/Consultants 1995A Logistical and Interpretive Report on Spectral IP andResistivity Surveys (Volume II)

MAPS IN POCKET

Map1: Total Field Magnetics, Contoured Data 1:2,500 Map 2: Electromagnetic Survey, VLF EM-16 Profiles (NAA) 1:2,500 Map 3: Electromagnetic Survey, VLF EM-16 Fraser Filter (NAA) 1:2,500 Map 4: Electromagnetic Survey, VLF EM-16 Profiles (NSS) v 1:2,500

p S:

MAPS IN VOLUME II

Plate 1: Chargeability (mS) Colour Images 1:5,000Plate 2: Resistivity Colour Images 1:5,000Plate 3: Compilation Map 1:5,000Plate 4: Blue Line Plot of All Pseudosections 1:5,000

TECHNICAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT WORK REPORT

ON THEMORRISETTE TOWNSHIP PROPERTY


1.0 SUMMARY

This report is intended to evaluate a potential gold and diamond exploration property, comprising 47 unpatented claim units located to the northeast of Kirkland Lake, in the heart of the current diamond exploration play. The present work was funded by a grant of 810,000 under the Ontario Prospectors Assistance Program.

The area around Kirkland Lake has a history of gold mining dating back to the 1890,s and a number of gold zones occur in structural breaks in Kinojevis volcanic rocks within Morrisette Township.

A number of airborne electromagnetic conductors occur on the property. One conductor is interpreted to be structural and a second believed to represent a felsic/mafic volcanic contact and both have some potential to host gold mineralization. Gold deposits are known to occur in the area and encouraging gold geochemical indicators are observed on adjacent properties.

Cursory diamond exploration began in the Kirkland Lake area in the 1960's but it is only since the early 1980's that companies began in earnest. Encouraging results of diamond exploration have been published recently. At least 19 kimberlites have been found near Kirkland Lake, of which 9 have been found to be diamond-bearing.

Two diamond-bearing kimberlites (B-30 S A-4) occur within 1 kilometer of the boundary of the Gold Insight property.

One known kimberlite pipe has been drilled to the south of the property by a subsidiary of DeBeers. This kimberlite was not found to be diamond bearing, however G-9 garnets, a favorable indicator mineral, were identified. At least two additional bullseye magnetic features occur nearby, are believed to be kimberlite and remain to be drilled.

The northern and southern parts of the property under review contain at least 4 coincident magnetic, electromagnetic and apparent conductivity of overburden anomalies which might represent kimberlite targets. These targets have never been evaluated on the ground.

This 47 claim unit Morrisette Township property is entirely underlain by the Blake River assemblage of felsic to mafic volcanic rocks which is in fault contact to the southwest of the property with felsic to mafic volcanic rocks of the Kinojevis South assemblage. Thick glaciolacustrine clay deposits cover much of the property and make exploration difficult.

The property is cut by linear features thought to be mafic/felsic volcanic contacts in two locations and a major fault in another. Carbonate alteration with low gold values has been noted on the neighbouring claims in similar topographic linears.

Recent geological mapping on the property has identified non-mineralized felsic volcanic rocks both to the north and south of the 115 degree striking structural linear which transects the property. The favourable linear was not observed on the ground as it is primarily overlain by thick glacio-lacustrine clays and swamps.

Till geochemistry identified two low grade gold grain anomalies, with calculated

grades in the heavy mineral fraction of 4.9 and 6.3 grams/tonne respectively. Sample T-002 overlies coincident magnetic bullseye and bedrock EM anomalies located in the northeast part of the property. Sample T-003 occurs just to the south of a weak magnetic high with coincident overburden and bedrock EM anomalies.

Till geochemistry has also identified 3 samples which contain purple grains of G9/G10 chrome pyrope. Sample T-012 occurs south of the coincident magnetic, bedrock EM conductor and gold in till sample T-002. Till samples T-013 and sample T-018 straddle a weak bullseye magnetic high, coincident bedrock and overburden EM signature.

A 1994 field program uncovered some weak geochemical indications of the presence of both gold mineralization and diamonds , but due to thick glacio lacustrine clays and associated swamp, has done little to evaluate the gold and

diamond potential of the primary target, a non-outcropping 115 degree trending linear structure.

A1995 ground geophysical program consisting of 19 kilometers of magnetometer and VLF EM-16 survey and 2.6 kilometers of IP were conducted to evaluate the potential of the NW-SE trending structure which transects the property. A resistivity low and VLF conductors outlined the margins of the main structure. Moderate high magnetic zones within and coincident with the margins of the structure remain of interest.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

The work for this report, was funded by a S10,000 grant from the Ontario Prospecting Assistance Program grant and includes a comprehensive review of the history of the geology, mineralization and potential of the mineral exploration property in Morrissette Township near Kirkland Lake Ontario. To that end, the technical merits of the property are reviewed and future programs discussed.

This Morrisette Township property and surrounding area has seen some mineral exploration looking for gold. A number of interesting discoveries but without significant gold reserves have been worked in the township and are located to the west and to the south of the ground under review. Sudbury Contact are actively evaluating a gold deposit which is located to the southeast.

Discoveries of kimberlite dikes and float have generated significant diamond exploration activity starting in the early 1980's. Monopros, a subsidiary of DeBeers, have drilled one of a number of potential pipes on the property and intersected barren kimberlite.

The author has reviewed the assessment file database and all government and available private reports pertaining to the area of interest. This report is based on that data review, 1994 and 1995 field programs consisting of geological mapping, geochemical sampling and ground geophysics and on more than 20 years of experience in the mineral exploration and evaluation field.

3.0 PROPERTY STATUS

3.1 Claims

The property consists of 9 unpatented mining claim blocks totalling 44 claim units, registered in Morrisette Township, and staked November 9 and 10, 1993. The claims are under a 60 day extension to allow for filing of the recent field work.

TABLE 1: LAND HOLDINGS TABLE

CLAIM BLOCK #CLAIM UNITS RECORDING DATE1200795 6 Decembers, 1993

1200796 61200797 11200817 6

1193295 11193296 6

1193297 91193298 31193299 6

3.2 Ownership

The property consists of 9 unpatented claim blocks, until recently, registered to 1051315 Ontario Limited which is a newly incorporated private company with sole shareholder being John P. Thompson. The claims were recently transferred to 738327 Ontario Limited. There is a Property Agreement on the claims splitting ownership; 1/3 to each of 738327 Ontario Limited, Gold Insight Resources Ltd. and to 1051315 Ontario Limited.

ONTARIO

*ir Morrisette Twp.

'oronto

500

Kilometers

1000

Project Location

Figure: |

JOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES

LOCATION MAP

MORRISETTE TWP PROPERTY

Nickila Lake

l Gate V CLIFFORD

BISLEY TWP. i

Coluibus 'Lake

Morrisette Twp Project

12CD797TN 1193298

ARNOLD TWP.

MORRISETTE TWP.

1051315 Ontario Limited


CLAIM MAP

MORRISETTE TWP

32D/4. 32D/5

3.3 Location

The Morrisette Township property consists of 44 unpatented claim units situated

in the Larder Lake Mining Division about 14 kilometers east of Kirkland Lake, Ontario. The claims occur within NTS map sheets 32D/4 and 32D/5 at approximately 79 0 54' west longitude and 48 0 15' north latitude.

3.4 Access

Bush roads give 4 wheel drive vehicle access to close to the southern boundary.

The northeast corner of the property is accessed from the Esker Lakes Provincial

Park road by a 4 km bush road trending westward at Lahaie Lake.

3.5 Climate, Topography ft Vegetation

The climate in the area is a typical continental climate where it is colder in winter

and warmer in summer than the coastal regions. Temperatures range between a

maximum of 40" and a minimum of -50" centigrade. The mean annual rainfall is about 600 mm and the annual snow fall about 300 mm with precipitation registered

on about 160 days of the year. The average wind speed is less than 20 km per hour

with the prevailing direction being from the west to northwest.

The topography of the Morrisette Townships property is gently rolling with some

relatively flat swampy areas overlying thick glaciolacustrine clays. Except for that

thick clay cover, the property relief is characteristic of the Superior Structural

Province of the Precambrian Shield. Depth of overburden, primarily clays, has been

measured up to 40 meters. The property is traversed east to west by Morrisette

Creek on the south and an unnamed small creek on the north quarter of the

property. No lakes occur on the property. Outcrop is common on the north and

southern quarters of the property only. The vegetation on the property consists of

secondary growth of spruce, pine, maple and birch trees. The lowlands are covered

in grasses, alders and scrub brush.

3.6 Infrastructure

Both timber and water supplies are plentiful on or near the property. Roads are in good condition peripheral to the property. Hydro lines occur a few kilometers to the southwest. Adequate supply of skilled manpower is available from the town of Kirkland Lake, located about 14 km to the west.

8

4.0 HISTORY OF THE AREA

The Kirkland Lake area has a history of gold exploration and mining dating from the

early 1900's, with a mineral production value in excess of S1.0 billion. A total of 67

mines have produced a total of just under 39 million ounces of gold (Meyer, 1992).

The gold deposits are proximal to the east-striking Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Fault Zone which has been traced as far east as Val d'Or and Malartic, Quebec where

additional gold mineralization occurs. Lesser amounts of gold mineralization have been found away from the fault zone both to the north and south.

The important gold deposits along the fault zone can be divided into two groups.

The first group, occur in strongly folded sedimentary rocks within the komatiitic

volcanics of the Larder Lake Assemblage. The second group located in the town

of Kirkland Lake, are hosted by trachytic volcanic and intrusive rocks and

sedimentary rocks of the Timiskaming Assemblage.

Gold deposits of the Larder Lake assemblage occur in fine-grained sedimentary

beds either rich in carbon, carbonate or chert and in quartz-carbonate veins. Gold

in the sedimentary rocks is in auriferous pyrite associated with arsenopyrite and

fuchsite and in some places, with chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena, barite and

scheelite. The gold-bearing beds occur interlayered with mass-flow turbiditic

conglomerates. The conglomerates have been variably altered. Gold in native form,

can occur in quartz-veins which cross-cut the fuchsite-rich conglomerates proximal

to the gold-bearing sedimentary rocks.

In Kirkland Lake, gold is concentrated in quartz-filled fractures cutting trachyte,

syenite and fluvial sedimentary rocks. Ore minerals including native gold, various

tellurides and auriferous pyrite. Limited chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, sphalerite,

galena, molybdenite and hematite occur in some places with the gold mineralization

as do gangue minerals such as tourmaline, chlorite, pyrite, barite, calcite and

graphite.

Outside the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake fault zone, gold occurs mainly in sulphide-

rich zones associated with the felsic volcanic rocks in the Blake River Assemblage

and the Gauthier Assemblage north of the fault zone and the Skead Assemblage south of the fault zone. Pyrite and chalcopyrite are the main minerals with lesser

amounts of sphalerite, galena and arsenopyrite occurring as well.

Quartz-carbonate veins are common throughout the Kirkland Lake area. Most are

less than 10 cm. wide and a few carry minor native gold with pyrite and

chalcopyrite.

During 1992, in Morrisette Township, Glencairn Explorations Ltd. tested the

extension of the A-zone on the Goodfish property, intersecting 8.2 grams Au per

tonne over 3.0 meters.

Base metal-sulphides occurrences are mainly in the Blake River Group near the

axis of the synclinorium. They occur as chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena and

molybdenite with pyrite in altered calc-alkalic volcanic rocks.

Within the western part of Morrisette Township on the Kenora Fault Extension

property, copper and gold mineralization occur in a shear zone within andesite

which is cut by quartz-feldspar porphyry dikes.

One of the first published references to kimberlites in the Kirkland Lake area was

made in 1948. The Ontario Department of Mines Annual Report (Geology of

Michaud Township), described what "may be termed a kimberlite" - a "striking

ultrabasic rock" containing phenocrysts of olivine, phlogophite and pyrope-rich

garnet as well as "a few foreign rock fragments" in a serpentinized, olivine-rich and

weakly magnetic matrix. The find occurred as very narrow dikes of "badly crushed"

and "crumbled" core and appeared to generate little interest at the time.

Almost two decades later, a glaciofluvial study of the Munro Esker delineated

anomalous concentrations of magnesium-rich pyrope garnets and associated

"kimberlitic rock fragments" in Gauthier Township, south of Highway 66. Glacial

tracing techniques led to the discovery of another kimberlite dike at the Upper

Canada Mine. Although only 1 m wide, it is among the wider kimberlite dikes known

worldwide. Age dating on the kimberlite indicates a Late Jurassic period of

emplacement (151 8 Ma).

DETAIL

teMWv ocs ***' M^?viirv"

\ ""-l

r*

( Source. Brummer et al 1992 )

I : ig 3 Kinibcrliics. alkaline ultramafic intrusions.

LFIGEND

i of HI'.iNH'ii'jrrl iliill

l.cicnlioii of Kl.ll 1 Pmjrcl iliill li

KLIP drill lie.lcn wilh k inJicaior mineral;

Munio E^ker

Munro n^kf r sample siicdl.A.Lcc. Wi5)

Munro Esker x.iinplc wiUi pyrope gnmcls (H.A. Lee. 1965)

Kiiiihcililc pipe

Kiml*riliic tlikr

Killll^CllllC Ill'.Tl

liulic.ilor iniiici.iU in drift

Snurret nf infnnniTfnn-

Lnralinni rt tntnr. kimbriltlr piprt. riikrt.

final tnH inrfiritni t*u*y minriali prnvidrd by

Ihr KhkUnH \jkkr RriliVnl (In.lnguri OITirr

Lnctiion nl II.A. \jtt'i Mnnin Fjker

lunplo from Ift (I96M Inetiinoof KLIP drill Snlci Irtwn Tonc.tciK ci al. (I9M) VH) PRiM drill hotel Irem McClcn.fhui (1991).

Figure 4 : Summary of KLIP Program Da;a ( Source. Mcclenaghan A Diablo 1992 )

10

A preliminary compilation of the kimberlite occurrences in the Kirkland Lake area is summarized. To date, 8 kimberlite pipes have been documented, All occur within a 15 km radius of Victoria Lake, straddling Morrisette, Arnold, Lebel and Gauthier Townships. Microdiamonds were reported in 2 of the kimberlite pipes, the A-4 pipe (Arnold Township) and the Diamond Lake pipe (Mcvittie Township). Eight macrodiamonds weighing a total of 0.30 carat, were recovered from an 8.17 tonne sample of the C-14 pipe in Clifford Township. One of the diamonds, considered to be gem quality, weighs 0.17 carat (Meyer).

Much work has been undertaken over the years and many gold showings found and worked on properties located to the west and south, on the Morrisette property itself very little work has been recorded prior to 1980.

In 1980, Rosario Resources, on the southern boundary of the township, drilled a gold showing located on the north shore of Victoria Lake. ,

In 1982, Monopros flew a helicopter-borne magnetic and EM survey over what is

now the Gold Insight ground and located 3 magnetic targets, two of which they diamond drilled in 1983 and again in 1984. Results of the 1983 drilling on target MA-20 are unavailable and it is believed that the target was not adequately explained. In 1984, on this anomaly, Monopros intersected 28 meters of kimberlite and stopped the hole in kimberlite. No diamonds were recovered from this target. On target MA-12, Monopros are reported to have drilled 2 holes in 1983 (no results available) and one drill hole in 1984 which intersected volcanics but did not explain the magnetic high.

Gleeson-Rampton Explorations in 1983 conducted a humus geochemical survey for gold on their Alfie Creek claim block located to the east of Gold Insight ground,

and in 1984 on the Lahaie Lake Claim Group in the northeast corner of the township. Anomalous gold in humus zones were outlined, overlying the Blake River

volcanics.

In 1985, a gold geochemistry in till survey was conducted on the Lahaie Lake claim group which uncovered a few anomalous values in the 14 ppm range. A ground magnetic and VLF survey was conducted on the Alfie Creek claim group, also in

Tiblc 2 Summary of documented kimberlite and/or lamproite occurrence! in Uie Kirkland Lake Relident Geologiu'i District (Source. Meyer 1992)

KimberliteOccurrence

Pipes

PI

P2

P3P4

P5

P6

Township

Bisley

Clifford

MorrisetteArnold

Arnold

Mcvittie

Name

Nickila Lake (B-30)

C-14

Morrisette CreekAlfie Creek 1

Alfie Creek 2

Diamond Lake

UTMZone

17

17

1717

17

17

Easting

580100

589200

580900583100

582650

592100-

MDINorthing No.

5348350 C2299

5347800 C2300

5340000 T11445341250 T1146

5340950 Tt 145.

5329800'

DiamondsFound?

No

Yes

NoYes

No

Yes(exact location not known)

P7

Dikes

DI

D2

D3

CM

Arnold

Gauthier

Michaud

Garrison

Harker

Arnold Al

Upper Canada

Ludgate Lake

Buffonta

Lightval Mines

17

17

17

17

17

583220

587300

567300

577450

587080-

5345050

5332500 T0701

5370400

5369650

5375800'

No

No

No

No

No(exact location not known)

Float

FIF2F3F4F5F6

HearstGauthierGauthierArnoldEbyMcvittie

171717171717

594000584250583900584500558600593800

532775053320505331600533795053255005328300

NoNoNoNoNoNo

Remarks

Drilled by Monopros Ltd. (84-06-01. 84-06-03. 84-06-04,85-o) and Lac Minerals Ltd. (B30A); Monopros hole 85-6 at Kirkland Lake Core Library.

Drilled by Lac Minerals Ltd. (CI 41. C14J); Dia MetMineralsLtd. recoverd 8 macrodiamonds weighing OJO carat from8.17 tonne sample (one diamond weighed 0.17 carat).

Drilled by Monopros Ltd. (83-20-01. 84-20-01).Drilled by Monopros Ltd. (83-13-01. 84-13-01) and Lac

Minerals Ltd. (A4A. A4B); 5 microdi amends were recovercd from Monopros hole 84-13-01.

Drilled by Monopros Ltd, (84-13-02, 84-13-03); outlinedcurved elliptical kimberlite pipe.

Sudbury Contact Mines Limited discovered 2 kimberlitepipes in the vicinity of Diamond Lake, 8 microdiimotxlsrecovered from first pipe, 4 of which are gem quality.

Drilled by Lac Minerals Ltd. (hole A1B).

3-feet wide, striking 340* and dipping vertically; best exposed at the 2750-foot level of the mine.

First documented kimberlite occurrence in the Kirkland Lakearea (J.Saucrly. 1948).

2 dikes, one striking 110* and dipping 60* to the south(within the Buffonta #6 Gold Ore Shear) and the otherstriking roughly 360* and dipping 60* to the west

Diamond drill hole intersected about 150 feet of kimberlite(A.M. Chaier, pers.comm.).

gravel pitgravel pitgravel pitgravel pitMary Ellen lamproite discoverygravel pit

Indicator Minerals

II121?

McGarryMcGarryMcGirry

McGarry GoldMcGarry GoldMcGjury Gold

171717

60275060-1 1 50MVI750

533510053WWO5.1M150

YesYesYet

from lodgment till; assessment report KL1RI2from lodgment till; assesimem report KL18I2from lodgment till: assessment report KL18I2

111985.

A ground magnetic survey was conducted on the northwest corner of the Gold Insight claims by Walker Explorations, in the Black River area.

Two drill holes on the Alfie Creek claims tested gold targets in 1985 and one hole in 1986 on the Lahaie Lake area also tested a gold target. Results were disappointing.

During 1992, Kimbouri Gold Corp. drilled one hole on the Alfie Creek claim group to test a circular magnetic high for the presence of kimberlite. The hole intersected calc-alkaline intermediate volcanics.

In 1993, Wheaton River Minerals Ltd. drilled one hole on Gold Insights ground on the magnetic high which Monopros drilled and which they designated as MA-20. The hole intersected kimberlite but no microdiamonds were found, however G-9 garnets were found in the core.

During 1979 to 1982 the Ontario Geological Survey conducted a study of the mineralogy and indicator minerals for both gold and base metal mineralization and kimberlites. A total of 326 basal till samples were examined for 200 parameters in the study. Some samples were collected on the Gold Insight ground in Morrisette

Township.

During 1992, the Geological Survey of Canada began a 4 year program in the Kirkland Lake area designed to increase the knowledge of the genesis of kimberlite, to develop refined techniques for kimberlite exploration and to evaluate the potential for the discovery of additional kimberlite occurrences. The GSC collected till, esker and bedrock samples in the area of known kimberlites.

12

5.0 GEOLOGY

5.1 Regional Geology

The Abitibi Subprovince is a Neoarchean granite-greenstone-gneiss terrain that developed between 2800 and 2600 Ma. It is bounded: to the south by the Ramsey- Algoma granitoid complex, the Cobalt Embayment and the Pontiac Subprovince; north by the Archean Opatica Subprovince; west by the Ivanhoe Lake cataclastic zone, which marks the western boundary of the Kapuskasing Structural Zone; and east by the Proterozoic Grenville Province.

The Abitibi greenstone belt consists of a northern belt and a southern belt in which lies the Kirkland Lake gold camp. The northern belt is characterized by abundant tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite intrusions, large anorthosite complexes, paucity of ultramafic flows, and greenschist or higher regional metamorphism. The southern belt is characterized by fewer tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite intrusions, abundant ultramafic flows and greenschist or lower regional metamorphism.

In the southern Abitibi greenstone belt, metavolcanic and associated metasedimentary units, and synvolcanic peridotite to granodiorite intrusions formed between 2750 Ma and 2700 Ma. Between 2700 and 2680 Ma large volumes of foliated tonalite-granodiorite batholiths were emplaced followed by more massive

granodiorite and syenite bodies. During and subsequent to this magmatism, alluvial-fluvial clastic metasedimentary rocks and alkalic metavolcanic rocks formed and are now in spatial association with regional, steeply dipping shear zones (Porcupine-Destor deformation zone and Larder-Cadillac shear zone). Regional deformation occurred prior to, and after, formation of the alluvial-fluvial clastic metasedimentary rocks and associated alkalic metavolcanic rocks. Metamorphic grade within the supracrustal rocks is generally subgreenschist to greenschist facies and rises to amphibolite facies near some intrusions.

Bedding and tectonic fabric in the southern Abitibi greenstone belt generally dip steeply to moderately (90 0 to 45 C ); however, shallow dips are present in some areas such as the core of the Blake River group. Folds are generally east or west trending and upright. There are south-verging thrust faults that predate and

,' ONTARIO

l ABITIBI L CtUEENStONF.^

" ELTUr^

Abitibi Greenstone Belt

!J,,Casa-l3crarcii -^^W m 1**f . ~~**'*!*L-'-'-'''-'-'-'-

Granitic rocks

Malic intrusions

- Ultramalic rocks

Early Precambrian sediments

100 Km

60 Mt

Middle Precambrian sediments

Volcanics

Munro GroupJMin in* Mill. 1JIO)

F/gure 5 Geotogy ol the Abitibi "greenstone" belt and location of Kirkland Lake (geology after Goodwin and Ridler 1970).

ABITIBI

BATHOLITHA - FAULT-BLOCK 'V A -'

KENOGAMISSIv - "l

ROUND L4 J t f l

BATHOLITH

SOUTHERN

FAULT . BLOCKl

' ' ' X\ x^ \' - -', \A \

f^^\

LEGEND

Inol )hu*v")

12 Cobalt Group

Mat*chfwjn dolutc (no!

lc rocks

M G'

• vc"i:i10 Mattivt to gnei;;ic Quiriz d-oriTf. l

uonrihjrmite

. 91'' "9 9a" Titnijlia'""iq

8 8a. 8". Bl*kt Bivn Groun. 8c* ' ' Rivei (Uppî Fm.. Ti;daic

7 Tt. 7li. Kmoirvi: C'Ou|i. 7c Kiiojtvn G-oup.(Middle Fm.. T udalf G'Oup)

6 6a L*'d*' Lakt G'oup. Eh Siouginon-Rorjueiniu'r G'Oun. 6c Lowci fm.. Tit&lcGroup

5 5c Po'CuDne GroupLower Supergroups

4 4a Skrad Gf otip. 4|i burner Mine Group. 4cUrpP' Frr:.. OvlO'O Group

3 3* Cai*"""e Group. 3c VnWlp Fm . 0"ioioGroun

2 7" Waljrnvawa Group. 2c Lowrr Fm.. OrioroG'OUP

1 la Pacaud lulls *"'

" "brrlerj to Kirkland Lake Area. JOUIh l.n.h Ol svncli-ortirni (J-mcn 1978C. 1979) r*l*rs lo KirVlanrl Lake Afrj rxorlli limb o' synclinorium (Jrns'n 1976. 197861

rcl**r* lo Trrtimrii Ar**.i IPykr 1 9BOI

IGoodwn 19651.

Figure 6 Geological map of the Timmins - Kirkland Lake area. ( Source. Jensen ft Langford 1983 )

13

postdate deposition of the younger alluvial-fluvial metasedimentary and alkalic metavolcanic rocks.

Major gold camps are spatially associated with steeply dipping shear zones, such as the Larder-Cadillac shear zone and the Porcupine-Destor deformation zone which transect the belt for over 300 km in a general easterly direction. In general, steeply dipping foliations and steeply plunging stretching lineations and minor folds characterize these zones, and both dextral and sinistral horizontal components of displacement are reported (e.g. Larder-Cadillac shear zone). The shear zones are spatially associated with the youngest supracrustal and plutonic assemblages and, in part, deform these assemblages. These observations indicate that the shear zones were active late in the history of the greenstone belt. The Larder-Cadillac shear zone, in part, marks the boundary between the southern Abitibi Greentsone

Belt and the Pontiac Subprovince.

The area was subjected to several major periods of glaciation during the Quaternary Period. The effects of all but the last, the Wisconsinan, are unknown and subject to speculation.

Glacial movement across the area was in a SSE direction (165 C -1700 azimuth). This advance resulted in the deposition of a silty sand to sandy silt till which was deposited subglacially as either lodgement or subglacial melt-out till. In a number of instances banded or stratified till was encountered.

Till thickness of between 0.5 and 1.0 m are usual, although depths of several meters are common. Surface exposures of till are highly oxidized and weathered to a depth of about 0.5 m giving this portion of the till a sandier appearance.

Glaciofluvial ice-contact deposits were developed in the area during the last phase of ice cover. The most dominant form of these deposits are the large esker systems which trend southward across the area. The eskers, composed of sand and gravel, are easily recognized by their crests, or bell-shaped ridges, which vary between 1

and 3 km in length. The crests are surrounded by hummocky to level terrain consisting primarily of sand. These sediments were deposited as either sub aqueous fans, deltas or outwash directly in front of, or adjacent to, the ice mass.

14

As the glacier wasted northward, glacial lakes Barlow and then Ojibway inundated the area. Fine-grained glaciolacustrine sediments deposited in the lakes are represented by clay, varved clay and silt. Varved clay material is by far the most common material.

Coarse-grained glaciolacustrine sediments, sand and gravel are best developed on the flanks of eskers where the sediments undergo a lateral facies change from sand to clay as the distance from the eskers increases.

As the lake drained and the sand plains became exposed to eolian activity, sand dunes formed. The dunes, composed of fine to medium grained sand, are parabolic in shape, indicating a paleowind direction from the west-northwest. After emergence, organic deposits began to accumulate in rock basins and along stream courses.

The most prominent glacial feature in the Kirkland Lake area is the north-south trending Munro Esker which can have elevation differences as much as 50 meters, however relief is more usually in the range of 10 to 20 meters. The esker trends just to the east of Morrisette Township and can be traced over a length of about 100 kilometers.

Diamond drilling in Morrisette Township in the vicinity of the Morrisette property has intersected up to 27 meters of overburden.

5.2 Local Geology

Within the southern belt of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt in the Kirkland Lake area, the Kinojevis South Assemblage to the south is in probable east-west trending fault

contact with the Blake River Assemblage to the north.

The main units of the Kinojevis South assemblage include massive and pillowed metabasalt of tholeiitic affinity. Intrusions include gabbro, diorite, quartz gabbro, quartz diorite, granite, syenite and feldspar porphyry.

CLIFFORD TWP.

ARNOLD TWP.

MORRISETTE TWP.

Lahaie l Lake

. . -—, •v v ^ _VVVVVVVVVvV V"V V p~ lr-0' O 'O V V

w v v v *J o " ' 4

v^VW^'

GEOLOGICAL LEGEND

PBM Gabbro and quartz gabbro

|.S'-'| Al-rich calc-alkalic basalt ft andesite

|"4x| Magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalts

fc3:j Fluvial sedimentary rocks

B|g|| Early Felsic Intrusive Rocks (quartz—feldspar porphyry)

|vl?| Iron-rich tholeiitic basalts

SYMBOLSFaultLava flow, topShaft

Drill hole locations Kimberlite locations KUP sample locations

iaJ Au in humus anomaly

CLAIM LOCATIONS

l j Gold Insight Resources Ltd. l l 1051315 Ontario Limited


GEOLOGICAL COMPILATION

MORRISETTE TWP AREA

JPT 32D/4. 320/5 'FIGURE: 7________i

Gate V CLIFFORD

SYMBOLS - - Fault

^7 Lava flow, lop

P Shaft

Drill hole locations

Kimberlite locations

KLIP sample locations

Au in humus anomaly

GEOPHYSICAL LEGENDAirborne overburden EM conductor(IBmS/m contour)

Airborne bedrock EM conductor(2.0 Siemens contour)

-VLF- Airborne VLF conductor(DeBeera tlrborne lurrej 1984)

^ J Airborne magnetic anomaly(W. 11. S = ffeok. Ifoderole or Strong mognetlc*) (L ~ magnetic low)

CLAIM LOCATIONSl [ 1051315 Ontario Limited


AIRBORNEGEOPHYSICAL COMPILATION

MORRISETTE TWP AREA

JPT 320/-1. riGURE: O

15

The assemblage is folded, faulted and intruded by numerous small felsic intrusions and consequently displays a convoluted aeromagnetic pattern.

Metavolcanic rocks of the Blake River assemblage range from basalt through to rhyolite, with basalt and andesite being dominant. Dacite and rhyolite are abundant in the center of the assemblage. Small intrusions include gabbro, quartz gabbro, diorite and quartz diorite. Metasedimentary rocks such as iron formation and interflow turbidities are very rare.

Units of the Blake River assemblage are shallow to moderately dipping. In general, units at the margin of the assemblage face towards the center of the assemblage, suggesting a synclinorium. The center of the assemblage is occupied by an anticlinal structure cored by felsic intrusions. This structure may in part reflect the presence of an original volcanic center.

In the western part of the area, northwest-striking faults are prevalent.

The contact between the Blake River assemblage and the Kinojevis South assemblage is not well mapped; however aeromagnetic maps indicate a sharp break between the "flat" field of the Blake River assemblage and the highly variable field of the Kinojevis South assemblage. In southern Bernhardt and Morrissette townships, pillowed mafic metavolcanic rocks (presumably Kinojevis South assemblage) strike north and appear to terminate against east-southeast-striking intermediate metavolcanic rocks (presumably Blake River assemblage). The region between the contrasting trends displays intense folding, shearing, carbonate alteration and also contains Timiskaming-like sedimentary rocks. These observations may indicate that the boundary between the Blake River and Kinojevis South assemblages is now a structural contact; however an original stratigraphic contact cannot be ruled out (Jackson, 1991).

5.35 Mineralization

A number of gold properties have been located within 6 or 7 km of the claims within

the Kenojevis South Assemblage.

16

Circa 1947, Ronal Red Lake Gold Mines Limited on their Victoria Lake property, intersected gold mineralization in a northeast trending carbonatized shear zone

within felsic to mafic volcanics. Values ranged upwards to 34 grams/tonne gold in

narrow veins. This property is located about 3 km meters south of the south comer

of the property.

The Mallard Lake Prospect, located about 3.5 km southwest of the property consists

of gold mineralization within masses of galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite and pyrite in 0.3 to 1.7 meter wide quartz-carbonate veins. Five channel samples taken at 3

meter intervals down the shaft, (circa 1920) averaged 5.5 grams/tonne gold (0.16

oz/ton), 375 grams/tonne silver, 5.71 07o Pb and D.43% Cu over widths of 0.7 to 1.0

meter.

On the Lahaie Lake claim group, located contiguous to the north of the property,

bedrock mapping has outlined shear zones and a large silicified alteration zone in metavolcanics in the southwest corner. This zone appears to extend eastward to where anomalous bedrock (120 ppb Au) was located in the OGS overburden drill

hole. Easterly trending gold in humus anomalies ranging from 20 to 117 ppb also

suggest the presence of east-west trending gold-enriched zones. Anomalous gold values in the -250 mesh fraction of the till on the southern part of the property

confirm the validity of the humus anomalies and also suggest local bedrock gold

sources on the Lahaie Lake claims. (Gleeson 1984).

On the Alfie Creek claim group, located contiguous on the east with the property, carbonatized and silicified andesite-dacite and feldspar porphyry has been mapped within an assumed northwesterly trending fault zone. Bedrock from the KLIP overburden drill hole near this fault zone contained 380 ppb Au. Zones of anomalous gold in humus (20 to 185 ppb) have been delineated in the

southwestern and central sectors of the claim group (Gleeson 1984).

Detailed geological mapping and prospecting on the Morrisette Creek claim group located about 3 km to the south of the property, turned up anomalous gold values (25 - 506 ppb) in a zone of carbonated andesite and quartz-feldspar porphyry. This

zone is some 3600 m west of the OGS KLIP hole which was drilled into a northwest faulted dacite-andesite sequence (Blake River Group) containing 300 ppb Au.

Gate V CLIFFORDGEOLOGICAL LEGEND

l Q [ Gabbro and quart?, gabbro

l 5 j Al-rich calc-alkalic basalt h andesite

l 4 l Magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalts

3 Fluvial sedimentary rocks

f 2 l Early Felsic Intrusive Rocks (quartz-feldspar porphyry)

l l l Iron-rich tholeiitic basalt

SYMBOLS- - Fault ^7 Lava flow, lop B Shaft

- l Prill hole locationQ Kimberlite locatio:® KLIP sample locations

(in) An in humus anomaly

GEOPHYSICAL LEGEND^-^ Airborne overburden EM conductor

(lOmS/m contour)Airborne bedrock EM conductor (2,0 SUmtni contour)

-vi.r- Airborne VLF conductor(DcDtert airborne lurrcy 1881)

Airborne magnetic anomaly(w. M, S " v*(k. Uodtrite or Strong mnjntll (t. * mftfnetic low)

C1A1M LOCATIONS

l l Gold Insight Kcsources Ltd. l l 1051315 Ontario Limited


COMPILATION MAP

MORRISETTE TWP AREA

IjPT 32D/4. 32D/5 FIGURE. 9

17

Anomalous gold values in the -250 mesh fraction of the till (35 - 61 ppb Au) and the humus (30 - 58 ppb Au) over and in the vicinity of the carbonated zone confirm the presence of a prime target for gold mineralization (Gleeson 1984).

Sudbury Contact is drilling on a nearby gold deposit and are reportedly planning to go underground to evaluate the discovery.

Preliminary work on properties adjacent to the claims has defined the presence of at least two styles of gold mineralization. One occurs in silicified zones in intermediate volcanics closely associated with northwesterly trending faults and shear zones. The second occurs in quartz-carbonate alteration zones in volcanics intruded by porphyry dikes.

This Morrisette Township property is in the heart of the diamond exploration play centered around Kirkland Lake and the Munro Esker which trends north-south immediately to the east of the property. At least 19 kimberlites have been found near Kirkland Lake, of which nine have been found to be diamond-bearing (Northern Miner April 12, 1993).

Monopros outlined, on the Gold Insight property, 3 elliptical magnetic targets believed to represent kimberlite pipes. One drill tested anomaly (MA-20) turned out to be barren of diamonds, drilling on a second anomaly (MA-12) was inconclusive and the third target remains untested. Additional targets in the northern part of the property also remain untested.

In Bisley Township, the Nickila Lake (B-30) kimberlite is located about 1 kilometer north of the northern boundary of Morrisette Township and the Gold Insight property. This kimberlite had a magnetic relief of only 124 nT and measured 350 meters by 220 meters. The kimberlite was determined to be barren by Monopros Ltd. but Lac Minerals recovered 3 microdiamonds (Brummer 1992).

The C-14 kimberlite pipe is located in Clifford Township about 6 kilometers east from the northeast corner of Morrisette Township. Seven macrodiamonds weighing 0.029 to 0.204 carats are reported to have been recovered from a 123 tonne bulk sample of the C-14 kimberlite (Northern Miner June 21, 1993).

18

The A-1 and A-4 kimberlite pipes occur within Arnold Township adjacent to Morrisette Township and within about 1 km from the Armitage property. The A-1 kimberlite is not diamond bearing, however the adjacent A-4 kimberlite returned 5 microdiamonds from a 1984 Monopros drill program ( Brummer 1992).

19

6.0 RECENT PROPERTY WORK

6.1 General Remarks

The Morrisette Township property is entirely underlain by massive and pillowed dacitic and andesitic volcanic rocks and intercalated tongues of massive to pillowed basaltic to andesitic volcanic rocks of the Blake River Group. The regional strike of the rocks is east-southeast at about 115 0 . The Kinojevis South Assemblage is in fault contact with the Blake River Group immediately to the south of the claim group. These rocks are more highly folded and trend about 055". At least one known Kimberlite (Ma-20 of Monopros) has intruded the volcanic rocks of the Kinojevis South Assemblage and been preserved.

Geological and geochemical surveys (soil and till) were conducted from August 23 to September 2,1994 and were funded by a S10,000.00 OPAP grant. The program consisted of geological mapping, B Zone soil geochemistry and till sampling.

A geophysical field program comprising magnetometer, VLF EM-16 and IP surveys was conducted during September and October 1995. The program was designed to help examine the potential of the property to host both gold mineralization and diamond deposits. A total of 15 kilometers of magnetometer and VLF survey was

contracted for but the contractor completed 19 kilometers. Of the above, 1.3 kilometers was completed on claim 159964 which is owned 1000Xo by Gold Insight Resources Ltd. This data is included in this report.

6.2 1994 Work Program

6.21 Geological Survey

Outcrop is scarce over much of the property and very little geological mapping or drill core data is available in the assessment files. As a result, detailed geological knowledge is poor. However topographic, magnetic and electromagnetic data can assist in the interpretation of the area.

The Blake River/Kinojevic South structural contact trends about 1150 in the area.

UOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES

GEOLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY

NORTHERN PART OF

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP PROPERTYSYMBOLS

' T-ooi TILL SAMPLE* S-OI SOIL SAMPLE* JPT-I ROCK SAMPLEm CLAIM CORNER POST

500

METERS

SCAL-E I:

27* 26* 25* 24* 23* 22* 21* 20W ftw

MM 17* 16*

15* U.W 13*

IZW Ilw IOW

9w aw 7w 6w 8w 4w J* ZW

LEGENDMAFIC VOLCANICS FELSIC VOLCANICS

FIGURE: /o

1193299

ROAD


GEOLOGY AND GEOCfCMISTRY

SOUTH EASTERN PART Of MORSIS5TTE TWP PROPERTY

J,l l

fj

-0-OUTCROP

200

s-ie

METES FIGURE: II

20

To the north of the contact in the Blake River Group, occur at least 3 linears trending about 115 C , two of which are probable felsic/mafic volcanic contacts while the third is probably structural.

Topography and the magnetic response to the west of the mafic volcanic flows located in the northern part of the property suggest the mafic volcanic unit extends much further west than indicated on geology map # 2193. The northern contact of the mafic volcanic unit is coincident with a series of small bullseye magnetic responses, 1 and 2 channel airborne EM anomalies and bullseye high apparent conductivity of the overburden anomalies. This area warrants further examination.

The structural linear in the south part of the property displays a VLF response on the Atfie Creek claims of Kimbouri Gold Group where a number of gold targets were tested between 1982 and 1986. Kimbouri Gold drill tested one magnetic bullseye in 1993 and intersected intermediate volcanics. This structure warrants investigation on the property.

Reconnaissance geological mapping was undertaken on the northern half of the property. Outcrop is limited to the hills bordering the swamp at the southern extension of the grid lines and on the northern extension of the lines at the east end of the grid. A total of 15 samples were collected for description comparisons. Here the outcrop is invariably a medium greenish coloured, very slightly altered fine to medium grained felsic volcanic rock (14 samples). No primary features were observed. Sulphides and quartz veining were also notably absent. One possible outcrop or large boulder of mafic volcanic rock was observed off the grid to the southeast at approximately line 4+50 E and 12+00 S. This rock was fine grained and dark green in colour, weathering to a greenish brown. Minor silicification was observed on a few parting planes.

One rock sample (JPT-11) interpreted as flow top breccia was associated with minor quartz veining and pyrite. The sample was sent in for analysis and returned low values of 31 ppb Au, 40 ppm Cu, 121 ppm Pb and 37 ppm Zn.

500

nil 26* am 21* 2Jw 22M

LEGENDMAFIC VOLCANICS FELSIC VOLCANICS


GEOLOGY ft AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL COMPILATION MAP

NORTHERN PART OF


SYMBOLS* T-OOl TILL SAMPLE* S-oi SOIL SAMPLEt- JPT-I ROCK SAMPLEm CLAIM CORNER POST

GEOPHYSICAL. L-EGEND

fo~) Airborne overburden EM conductor(ISnoS/m contour)

^7) Airborne bedrock EM conductor(2.0 Si*m*u contour)

'*~) Airborne magnetic anomaly(W. H. S = "04k. Mod.r.U or Strottj nufacUei) (L * mi4o*tio low)

FIGURE: 11

21

6.22 B Zone Soil Geochemistry

A total of 21 B Zone soil samples were collected in areas of minimal outcrop and down slope from topographic highs, in an effort to evaluate the gold potential of the area. The samples were collected from the NE corner of the grid and were analysed by geochemical techniques (atomic absorption) for Au, Cu, Pb and Zn.

None of the samples were collected from the structural target area which has no

outcrop and is primarily covered by swamp. None of the samples returned any anomalous values.

6.23 Till Survey

A total of 18 till samples were collected over the grid and sent to Overburden Drilling Management Ltd. for examination for gold grains and diamond indicator minerals. About 8 kg. of sample were collected in a plastic bag using a shovel and Y* inch screen.

Overburden Drilling Management sieved the sample, passed the sample over a shaking table and subjected the concentrate to a heavy liquid separation. A count of gold grains and kimberlite indicator minerals was then undertaken.

Samples were generated, where possible, down ice from the potential target area. Two samples, T-002 and T-003, located on line 2+50 W at 6+50 N and line 4 W at 4+60 S respectively returned low but anomalous gold grain counts. The samples T-012, T-013 and T-018 were observed to contain multiple grains of purple G9/G10 garnet. Samples T-012 and T-013 also containes picroilminite grains. Samples T- 012, T-013 and T-018 are located at lines 2 W at 3+15 N; 2 W at, 4+00 S and 8 W,

at 5 S respectively.

22

Table 3 OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED

GOLD GRAIN SUMMARY SHEET

Sample Number of Visible Gold Grains Non-Mag Calculated PPB Visible Gold

No.

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

008

009

010

011

012

013

014

015

016

017

018

Total

29

50

6

6

11

0

1

9

22

33

4

8

19

10

15

6

10

17

Reshaped

11

31

5

6

8

0

1

8

15

5

2

4

11

8

1

2

1

11

Modified

13

17

1

0

1

0

0

1

5

21

2

4

6

2

8

4

9

3

Pristine

52

0

0

2

0

0

0

2

7

0

0

2

0

6

0

0

3

Weight

31.6

28.8

5.6

15.8

11.3

2.3

1.1

13.5

17.0

35.0

5.1

22.0

79.1

10.8

63.8

15.2

30.9

36.1

Total

386

4909

6303

86

101

0

339

190

106

94

121

50

22

51

10

214

52

109

Reshaped

265

4793

25

86

74

0

339

142

90

20

32

2

13

50

0

140

12

70

Modified

114

112

6278

0

2

0

0

47

15

61

89

48

9

1

8

74

40

5

Pristine

7

4

0

0

24

0

0

0

1

14

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

33

23

Table : 4 OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED

LABRATORY SAMPLE LOG

KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL COUNTS

Kim Count

SampleTOTAL

Number

001

002

003

004

005

006

007

008009

010

011

012

013

014

015

016

017

018

GP

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

25

0

0

0

0

1

GO

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

DC

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.

IM

0

10

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

5 to 1 mm

CR

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

GP

2

1

0

2

0

0

0

1

0

3

04

4

0

0

0

1

4

DC

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

013

0.25-C

KIM'S

3

2

0

3

0

0

0

30

4

0

8

11

0

0

0

2

8

GP: Purple garnet, (G9/G10 chrome pyrope)GO: Orange mantle garnetDC: Chrome diopside, emerald greenIL: Picroilmenite

CR: Chromite

24

6.3 1995 Work Program

6.31 Grid Extension

The original grid was completed in 1993 and comprised a 2700 meter long east-

west trending base line with north-south crosslines at 100 meter intervals totalling

19.7 kilometers. The base line is cut on claimsj200795, 1200796 and 1200817.j.rJ^ During 1995, prior to the geophysical survey, j^-kilometers of new line was cut andpicketed. The new gridding is located predominantly north of the existing grid.

6.32 VLF EM-16 Survey

A19 kilometer, 2 frequency VLF EM-16 survey was conducted on the north-south lines by an independent contractor, Brian Madill of Kirkland Lake. Lines were 100

meters apart and readings were taken every 25 meters along the lines using both

Annapolis (21.4 kHz) and Cutler (24.0 kHz). The contractor used a Geonics VLF EM-16. The profile data and contoured fraser filter maps for both frequencies are

enclosed in the map pocket.

A strong VLF response is indicated on the NE and SW flanks of the NW-SE

trending structural break running through the property. The structural zone appears

to be in the order of 700 meters wide. The VLF response within the zone is

relatively flat.

6.33 Magnetometer Survey

A19 kilometer, total field magnetometer survey was conducted on the north-south

lines by an independent contractor, Brian Madill of Kirkland Lake. Lines were 100

meters apart and readings were taken every 12.5 meters along the lines.The

contractor used a Geonics G816 portable proton magnetometer. Diurnal control

was established by tie-ins at control stations established at the intersections

between the grid lines and the base line. A primary control station (base station) was established at grid coordinates Line 11W and station 400N. The contoured

total field magnetic data is presented on a map located in the map pocket.

(LO

coot

500

METERS

SCALE I:

Z7w 26* Km M.* UN Z2W 2M


INTERPRETATION OF GROUND IP ft VLF

ON GEOLOGY BASE MAP

NORTHERN PART OF


LEGENDMV MAFIC VOLCANICS FV FELSIC VOLCANICS

SYMBOLS

* T-OOl TILL SAMPLE* S-OI SOIL SAMPLE* JPT-I ROCK SAMPLEm CLAIM CORNER POST

* .FT-*

JFT-9** 1

L^——/

flOS

FIGURE: t 3

25

Readings on the survey vary up to 500 gammas, however the average is less than 300 gammas. There are no clear trends in the contoured data, however a number of observations can be made. On the east half of the grid, the higher magnetic values occur adjacent to the VLF conductor and within the implied structural zone. On the west half of the grid, the high magnetics occur coincident with the VLF conductor which flanks the southern boundary of the structure.

One magnetic low between lines 5W and 8W at about station 350N is partially coincident with a weak VLF conductor.

6.34 IP Survey

A 2.65 kilometer time domain spectral induced polarization (IP) and resistivity survey was conducted on the property from October 29 to November 4, 1995 by JVX Limited of Toronto, Ontario. The survey was conducted on 4 north-south lines spaced 300 meters apart. The survey utilized a Scintrex IPC-7 transmitter and a Scintrex IPR-11 receiver in a pole-dipole array with 6 electrodes spaced 25 meters apart. A separate report by JVX Limited is attached as Appendix II.

The survey outlined two resistivity lows, separated by a resistivity high which coincides with a felsic volcanic outcrop. The resistivity low is coincident with the interpreted NW-SE trending fault in the area. JVX Ltd comments that the resistivity low is likely caused by a predominantly clay overburden. The area of high chargeability coincides with the resistivity high which is coincident with the felsic volcanic outcrops in the northern part of the property.

However the southern boundary of the IP resistivity low is coincident with a VLF conductor and is flanked to the north by a magnetic high. The northern contact of the resistivity low is partially coincident with a magnetic low on its western extension

and a magnetic high to the east.

n.0

500

METERS

SCALE I:

9w M 7* 6w Sw tw j* 2w M

LEGEND

MAFIC VOLCANICS FELSIC VOLCANICS

SYMBOLS

T-OOI TILL SAMPLE S-OI SOIL SAMPLE JPT-I ROCK SAMPLE CLAIM CORNER POST

JOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATESGROUND TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC CONTOUR MAP

ON GEOLOGY BASE MAP

NORTHERN PART OF


FIGURE: | 4.

26

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

This 44 claim unit Morrisette Township property is entirely underlain by the Blake River assemblage of felsic to mafic volcanic rocks which is in fault contact to the southwest of the property with felsic to mafic volcanic rocks of the Kinqjevis South assemblage. Thick glaciolacustrine clay deposits cover much of the property and make exploration difficult.

In terms of the search for gold mineralization, the property is in the early stages of exploration. The neighbouring Affie Creek property has been found to possess east- west trending gold in humus anomalies coincident with assumed contacts or linears, and one boulder on the property boundary returned 10 ppb gold.

The property is cut by linear features thought to be mafic/felsic volcanic contacts in two locations and in one case to be a major fault. Carbonate alteration with low gold values has been noted on the neighbouring claims in similar topographic linears. Sudbury Contact is presently evaluating a gold deposit located to the southeast.

The property has the potential to host both gold mineralization and diamonds.

Kimberlites located on neighbouring properties within 1 kilometer both to the east (A-4 kimberlite) and to the north (B-30 kimberlite) have been shown to be diamond bearing. On the Gold Insight Resources ground to the south, Monopros has outlined three potential kimberlite targets, drill tested two and confirmed that one (MA-20) is kimberlite with favourable G-9 garnet indicators. Drill core from the second target tested did not explain the magnetic anomaly.

The various airborne magnetics and VLF surveys over the property have outlined a number of kimberlite targets.

On the southern part of the property, located between the two tongues of mafic volcanics, occur another three magnetic bullseye anomalies each about 25 nT above background. Swamp overies the magnetic anomalies. A northwest-southeast trending linear interpreted as a regional fault cuts the property near this target.

27

Recent geological mapping on the property has identified non-mineralized felsic

volcanic rocks both to the north and south of the 115 degree striking structural

linear which transects the property. The favourable linear was not observed on the

ground as it is primarily overlain by thick glaciolacustrine clays and swamps.

Due to the nature of the cover over the main target area, B-zone soil sampling was not an effective tool for exploration.

Till geochemistry identified two low grade gold grain anomalies, T-002 (2+50 W at

6+50 N) and T-003 (14 W at 2+00 S) with calculated grades in the heavy mineral fraction of 4.9 and 6.3 grams/tonne respectively. Sample T-002 overlies a

coincident ground magnetic high and IP resistivity high as well as an airborne

bedrock EM anomaly located in the northeast part of the property. Sample T-003

occurs on the southern contact of the resistivity low and is coincident with a VLF

conductor.

Till geochemistry has also identified 3 samples; T-012, T-013 and T-018 which

contain purple grains of G9/G10 chrome pyrope. Sample T-012 (2 W at 3+15 S),

occurs south of the coincident magnetic, bedrock EM conductor and gold in till

sample T-002. Sample T-013 (2 W at 4 S) and sample T-018 (8 W at 5 S) straddle

a weak bullseye magnetic high, coincident bedrock and overburden EM signature.

In general, the IP and VLF surveys outlined either the northern and southern limits of the NW-SE trending structural zone which transects the property or the limits of

the clay overburden which fills the trough caused by differential weathering of the

structural zone. The moderate magnetic highs within the zone and coincident with

the southern boundary are interesting. Geochemistry has been of very little help in

this setting.

28

8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The property remains prospective to primarily host gold mineralization within or adjacent to the 115 degree trending linear structure which transects the property. More detailed IP ground geophysics combined with deep auger or overburden drilling are recommended to further evaluate this non-outcropping target.

29

REFERENCES

Brummer, J. J. et. al. 1992. Discovery of Kimberlites in the Kirkland Lake Area

Northern Ontario Canada. Part II: Kimberlite Discoveries, Sampling, Diamond Content, Ages and Emplacement; in Expl. Min. Geol. Vol. 1, no 4, P351-370.

Farkas, A 1993. Electron Microprobe Analysis of Diamond Indicator Minerals From Northern Ontario Kimberlite Pipe, March 1993; unpublished report for Wheaton River Exploration Ltd., 15p.

Fortescue, J.A.C. et al 1984. A Synthesis and Interpretation of Basal Till Geochemical and Mineralogical Data Obtained from the Kirkland Lake (KLIP) Area (1979-82) Part II; in OGS Open File Report 5506. 630p.

Gleeson, C. F. and Rampton, V. N., 1984. The Use of Near Surface Materials in Gold Exploration, Kirkland Lake Area; in CIM-OGS Till Tomorrow 84, p30- 31.

Goodwin, A. M. and Ridler, R. 1970. The Abitiba Orogenic Belt; Geological Survey

of Canada, paper 70-40, p1-30.

Jackson, S. L. and Fyon, J. A. 1991. The Western Abitibi Subprovince of Ontario; in OGS Special Volume 4, Part 1, p405-482.

Jensen, L S. and Langford, F. F. 1985. Geology and Petrogenesis of the Archean Abitibi Belt in the Kirkland Lake Area, Ontario; OGS Misc. Paper 123, 130p.

Mcclenaghan, M. B. and Diablo, R. N. W. 1992. Exploration for Kimberlites Using Drift Prospecting, Kirkland Lake; NODA Summary Report 1992-93, p89-92.

Meyer, G. 1992. Kirkland Lake Resident Geologists District 1992; in Report of Activities 1992 Resident Geologists, OGS Misc. Paper 161, p273 - 305.

Ontario Geological Survey. 1973. Geological Compilation Series Map 2205,

Timmins - Kirkland Lake Sheet, Scale 1:253,440.

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

l, John P. Thompson of 1279 Ingledene Drive, Oakville, Ontario do certify that:

1. l am a self-employed consulting geologist and engineer.

2. l am a graduate of Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia with a B.Sc. in geology in 1971 and a M.Sc. in geology in 1974.

3. l am a registered professional engineer in the provinces of Ontario and Saskatchewan.

4. l have been practicing my profession continuously since graduation in 1974.

5. l hold a 1/3 interest in the property through my company 1051315 Ontario Limited which has a property agreement with Gold Insight Resources Ltd and 738327 Ontario Limited.

6. This report entitled 'Technical Review And Assessment Work Report On The Morrissette Township Property, Kirkland Lake Area Ontario December 31,1995" was based on a review of available data, on the field work carried out in the fall of 1994 and 1995 and on my knowledge of the setting of gold deposits in Canada.

Oakville, Ontario December 31, 1995

APPENDIX l

SOIL AND ROCK ANALYSES CERTIFICATES

Established 1928

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of TSL/Assayers Inc.

Assaying - Consulting - Representation

Geochemical Analysis Certificate 4W-2030-RG1Company: J.P.THOMPSON & ASSOCIATES Date: SEP-07-94 Project:

J.P.Thorapson

We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of l rock samples submitted SEP-02-94 by .

Sample Au Au Check Cu Pb Zn Number PPB PPB PFM PFM PIM8-688005 31 24 40 121 37

Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

Established 1928

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of TSL/Assayers Inc.

Assaying - Consulting - Representation

Geochemical Analysis Certificate

Company: J.P.THOMPSON 8i ASSOCIATESProject:Ann: J.P.ThompSOD

We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 21 Soil samples submitted SEP-02-94 by .

4W-2031-SG1

Date: SEP-08-94

Sample Number508501 508502 508503 508504 508505508506 508507 508508 508509 508510508511 508512 508513 508514 508515508516 508517 508518 508519 508520508521

Au Au Check PPB PPBNil Nil

2 Nil

3Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

39 7

Nil Nil Nil Nil

5 Nil

2 Nil

3 37

Cu P1M18 25 8 15 1211 8 5 6 9

8 4 15 7 10

8 7 5 12 3

20

Pb PIM

9 5 2 5 54 4 3 2 1

5 4 6 3 31 3 1 1 41

Zn PHtf

36 11 12 22 2539 6 3

11 14

24 13 28 182211 12 10 14 10

18

Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

APPENDIX M

TILL SAMPLING OBSERVATION SHEETS

FIGURE It EXAMPLE OP AN OBSERVATION PORK POR OVERBURDEN SAKPL8

General

Stop Number: f U.T.M. Reference: Aerial Photo:

Sample Number (s) : ~T-ô J 0^7/3

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/ level /f^foll ingjE ridged/ steep/Jjari^ced/ undulating/ veneer - sample' site location: top/ (fJottom/ side:

C) Slope: Inclination- ^ycLf Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/^Moderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type- (^Coniferous^ Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/Bog/ Othej

: State- Virgin/îogged^Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: /

Material Description

A) Colour:Munsell Code:

B) Texture: Sandr coarjBe/Qfeii^llB^ fine:y/ clayey

C) Structure^Structurelessy Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/tlvenly laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightlj^Sticky/ Sticky^~" T^ Loose/ Friable/CFinjib

Loose/ Soft/ Hard

E) Cementation: Yes^Nox - Weak/ Strong/ Indurated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/.Few/ Common/Âbundant Size Range: V 0*^ fa i*di

Shape: Roundedy^^jibroundediCÂngulaj

Types: (^crv-TeQ^p^s/^r^^-' 9r4KG, ^2/C/cVvwo/?*l l ' * ' 7 ^^ . 4 (. ^ f

USB BACK OP PAGE POR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS I

FIGURE It EXAMPLE OF AN OBSERVATION FORK FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General

Stop Number: c?^- U.T.M. Reference: Aerial Photo:

Sample Number (s): "7~6^ "2 _ O S*

Site Description ^ 5

A) Material:

B) Surf ace Exprqgaion ; apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/ridged/ steep/terraced/ undulating/ veneer

- sample" sice locat ion : top/xtJottoniJf side:

C) Slope: Inclination- .Jdj Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained^Moderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type -/^"Coniferous? Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/v Hun/ Otherj^ ^^

: State- Virgin/ 6gged7^Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: X YJ~^



D) Texture: Sand- cojirae/ medium/ fine f-silty/ clayey

C) structure: trtlcTu re l e ss^ Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ Evenly laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly^ Sticky/ Sticky c^ggTsp- Loose/ Friable/ ^ Dry- Loose/ Soft/ Hare

E) Cementation: Yes/- Weak/ Strong/ Indurated

F) Clast s: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ Common/bundant Size Range

Shape;cypundeg/ SubroundedÂQgulaj? StriatedPYfiS/ No - .T^pefl: (^wi/e 9r-e/^, -Or/C^ w^^ Vi)/c

USB BACK OF PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS l

FIGURE It EXAMPLE OP AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General

Stop Number: ^ U.T.M. Reference: Aerial Photo:

Sample Number(s): ~J~^ 0 O

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surfaceîxpression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/ l e ve L/rol l ing/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/.jindulating/ veneer - sample Tnue locat ion ; top/ bottom/

C) Slope: Inclination- /Jj^ ~ Aspect-s^ ^

D) Drainage: Well drained/ Moderately well drained/^Poorly

E) Vegetation: Type- Coniferous/) Deciduous/ Mixed/ /s'crub/xterass/ler:

: State -^Virgin/ Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: f J y~~ '

Material Description ,-


D) Texture:

i

C) Structure

Comments:

Structureless/ Ripplnated

ed/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky^ S tick]Moist- Loose/ Friable/ Firm Dry- Loose/ Soft/ Hard

E) Cementation: YesXNo.) - Weak/ Strong/ rhdtrfated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ (Common/Âbundant Size Range:

Shape: faunde Striate



General

Stop Number: j~. U.T.M. Reference: Aerial Photo:

Sample Number (s) : "7^—@Q\JL S

Site Description 5~ *3

A) Material: "^""'/f

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terrac^d/'-tKidulating - sample site location: top/ bottom/^flide^x

er

C) Slope: Inclination- S f^G ^_____ Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drainedy^Moderately well drained/) Poorly drained

Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: 7 rjv~~ -



D) Texture: - coarse—mexum/ fine ^) sandyy silty/) clayey

C) Structure/TStructurelss/Jlippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/[nated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Nonsticky/ Slighfci7~S4:icky/ Sticky ioisi Loose/ Friabl

Loose/ Soft/ Hai

E) Cementation: Ye- Weak/ Strong/ In3urated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/^Commo Size Range:

Abundant

Shape: Rounded/ 'subrounded/ Angular Striated: Yes/ N

*USB BACK OF PAGE FORV ADDITIONAL ''COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS l

FIGURE li EXAMPLE OF AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General

Stop Number: U.T.M. Reference: Aerial Photo:

Sample Number (s) : *F--frO'^ g~ SJ *799 O

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/Q.nclii level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terracedA-w^dulating/'veneer - sample site location: top/ bottom/ (pidj

C) Slope: Inclination- Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/t^Moderately well drained^ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type-^ConiTeroug^) Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub7~~GraBSj^-BogA Otfler;

: Stater^vTrgXo^Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: J

Material Deecription


b

B) Texture: Sand- coarse/ in fillj) sandy

um/ fine clayey

C) Structure:(Structureles^/ Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/rnTy lainlnated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly^Sticky/ Sticky Loose/ Friable/^FTrjjrj Loose/ Soft/ Hard"

E) Cementation:- Weak/ Strong/ Indurated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ FewAômmon/ Abundant Size Range: ô 7 77

^ ^ r JL^- **~Shape: Striated:

USE BACK OF PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS I

FIGURE Is EXAMPLE OP AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General


Sample Number (s ) : ""- Q o . ^ V 77?C/

Site Description S^3*/^ 7?S

A) Material: "ft /f

B) SjLnHrace Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/ el^ rolling/ ridged/ steep/terraced/ undulating/ veneer

sample site location: top/ xbottom/) side:

C) Slope: Inclination- o Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/ Moderately well drained/Cgoorlydrained

E) Vegetation: Type- JZeniferous/ Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/C

: State- (vlrgiijy Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: f -y*f .



B) Texture: Sand- coarse/jjiedJAm/ fineclayey

C) structure ;Cstructiirelei3sJf Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/Evenly laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistencyf^Wet) Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/Sticky'^-Molst- Loose/ Friable/ Firm ^^r^

Dry- Loose/ Soft/ Hard

E) Cementation:- Weak/ Strong/ ImSurated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ C Size Range: , /' , tr

"^ *^Shape ;Striated': V.es/i No

USB BACK OF PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS lIA

FIGURE It EXAMPLE OP AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN SAKPLB

General


Sample Number(s)

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/ veneer

sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

C) Slope: Inclination- O Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drainedy^Moderately well drained/)Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type- f^Toniferous/ Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/^GrassT)Bo^L-Qther: ^ ^

: State- yfrgin?J Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: J ~jf '


A) colour:Munsell Code:

B) Texture: Sand-

C) Structui

Comments:

D) Consistency: Weji-"tfois' *Dry^

medium/ fine '- silty/ clayey

Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ nated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Nonsticky/ Slightij^Sticky/ Sticky Loose/ Friable/ (PiraT Loose/ Soft/ Ha


F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few^ômmpnÂbundant Size Range: /^ /

arShape Striat


FIGURE It EXAMPLE OF AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General


Sample Number (s) : "/^^"O JP""- *r~2? s\/O z* 13 uSite Description

A) Material: .

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky /Cine l inej level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/ Veneer - sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

^r*'C) Slope: Inclination- CI Aspect- ^^f— *CD) Drainage/'Weli- drained/* Moderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type-^Coniferoua/^Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrxib/^Grasfli/:her:

: State-(virgjLn^) Logged/ Fired/ Stress:




D) Texture: Jjand- cQarsje/ medium/ fine Ti lT^(ând^s i 11 y/ clayey

C) structure^ gtructurelegs/ Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/ StickyMpJ^t- Loose/ Friabe/ Firm

E) Cementation: --^—^s^-- Weak/ Strong/ IrJSurated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/^Common^ Abundant Size Range: ^/^Vss^r^-

Shape: Rounded/ 'Subrounded/ Angular Striated: Yes/ No

USE BACK OF PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS l


General


Sample Number(B)

Site Description

A) Material: S

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummock^/incl level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating - sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

~3v- y. "7 9

Aspect-

erately welldrained/? Poorly drained

C) Slope: Inclination- l

D) Drainage: Well drained/^

E) Vegetation: Type-x^ConiferousJS Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/\^Bfl^?ÔOierT

: State/^VirginT/Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled:


A) Colour: J~^g c/vX*^ Munsell Code:

B) Texture (^Sanjty coarse/(medium/' fine. - Handy/ s^TfyT clayey

C) Structurey'St'ructureless/Jt'ippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ "Evenly laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Plow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Nonsticky/ SlighJOy-Sticky/ Sticky Loose/ Friable7(Tij Loose/ Soft/ Hart

'Few/ Common/ Abundantn

E) Cementation: Yes/No - Weak/ Strong/ IntiOTr

F) Clasts: Abundanc Size Rang

Shape: Rounded/ Subrounded/ Angular Striated: Yes/ No iTvnpn * ^-^ -L-" . lJ.JTJ./CD. ^p - ffj l/AIAjr* i /^ (*V lOvvW^ y t/ c*' c^-/v\,j C \



General


Sample Number (s) : "f—p/O fT" **] J ?S~

Site Description ZT~2V-Vj

A) Material: "TT?/

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/6 veneer - sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

C) Slope: Inclination- /0 t Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/ (Moderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type- (doniferfluA/ Deciduous/ Mixed/^Jbg^rSther:

: State-xVlrgin/) Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: / ~Ti ~



p

D) Texture: Sand- coarse/ medium/ fine t-silty/ clayey

C) Structure^S^ructurelesB^ Rippled/ Cross -bedded/ Graded bedding/Evenly laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/ StickyLoose/ Friable/f^FIrgp Loose/ Soft/ Har3


F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ CommonÂbundai Size Range:

StriTfpe


FIGURE Is EXAMPLE OF AN OBSERVATION PORK FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General

Stop Number: U.T.M^, Reference: Aerial Photo:.——7~—— yn

Sample Number (s} : l ~^ Cs,

Site Description

A) Material;

.pt ion

-TT//'B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky//incline

level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/1 VfjfiSer - sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

C) Slope: Inclination^

D) Drainage

O Aspect-

Vfell drained/JModerately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type-^Coniferous^t Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/ir:

: State- Virgin/ Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled


- Iff-A) Colour:

Munsell Code

B) Texture: medium/ fine silty/ clayey

C) Structure:

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet-

's/ Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ aminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/ Sticky - Loose/ Friable/ Firm Loose/XSoftA/Hard

E) Cementation: YesfHo/ - Weak/ Strong/ rrtrJtfrated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ Commo Size Range:

Subrounded//AngularShape:StriateTypes:

USB BACK OP PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS l

FIGURE It EXAMPLE OF AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN 8AMPLR

General

Stop Number:

Sample Number(s) :

Site Description

A) Material

U.T.M. Reference: Aerial Photo:

ST?

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/ level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/VSheer - sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

C) Slope: Inclination- f'ft Aspect-

D) Drainag^riWell drained/ Moderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Typ^ Coni f erouflA-'Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/^*~ ther;

Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: f ~js~'


(ÛT S? w' * '~ ? f e:

A) Colour: Munsell Co

B) Texture:^^Sand^ coarse/ medium/ fine Till^^L^SndyT) silty/ clayey

C) Structure^tructurelesg/JRippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ Evenly laminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/ StickyMoist- Loose/ Friable/ Firm

Loose/s'oftT^Hard

E) Cementation: Yes/No - Weak/ Strong/

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ Common^ Abundant,Size Range: Q/, C-* '^* -o

Shape : S t ria t c Types:

ubrounded/ Angular ^

s.



General


Sample Number (s) : ~"7""^- /~) f

Site Description

A) Material: "ff t

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky /Înclined/ level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/ veuudl - sample site location: top/rfSottom/* side:

C) Slope: Inclination- C . ... Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/ Moderately well drained/poorly drained

E) Vegetation: TypeXômrferoGs^yDeciduous/ Mixed/er: Logged/ Fired/ Stress:


Material Descrition


B) Texture: S^nd--^ coarse/ medium/ fineclayey

C) Structurei^StructureleBS^Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ ^-SvtM-ily idlkilnated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: W^t - Nonsticky^^-Sldghtiy Sticky/ Sticky slfolB^j/ Loose/^FriabJ.py Firm Dry- Loose/ Sot t/Hard

E) Cementation:- Weak/ Strong/ inOuTrated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few^f Common/^ Abundant Size Range: ..^ /^ ' V//

Shape ;fôundedyjûbroundejay Angular Striat


-


General


Sample Number (s)

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummockylevel/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terracedjûndulating/" veneer - sample site location: top/ bottom/^side^

C) Slope: Inclination- C Aspect -

D) Drainage: Well drained/f^Moderately^ well drained/oorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type-^XCpniferous/JDeciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/er:

" Virgin/Jiogged/ Fired/ Stress:




O

D) Texture^^sand^ coars^ mediupi/ fine.- sandy/ MiEy/ clayey

C) StructurprTstructurelesfl/Jlippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/raininated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/ Sticky- Loose/ Friable/ Firm

E) Cementation: - Weak/ Strong/

F) Clasts: Abundance Size

rated

Few/ Common/ Abundant

Shape: Rounded/ Subrounded/ AngularStriated: Yes/ NoTypes:

USB BACK OF PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS I

FIGURE Is EXAMPLE OF AN OBSERVATION FORK FOR OVERBURDEN BAKPL8

General


Sample Number (s): y^- Q 7 jT S'fi/S^^

Site Description ^* t/ If t V~9

A) Material: ÔWJ .

Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/ inclined/ leyeifo rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/ veneer

~^~ site location: top/ bottom/ side:

/ Q Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/ Moderately well drained/poorly drainec-^-- -^ """""^

E) Vegetation: Type- gpRiferous3 Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/JogÔTKerT

: State-^Sifgin/ Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: ^ -\f/ "


A) Colour: /KC-Cr l O AX Munsell Code:

D) Texture San^ c oa r s e med i.vmy fine f- ffn- sandy"/ s ll'L y y c l ay ey

C) S t ructure ; (pgTuctureless^ Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- NQnstickv/ Slightly Sticky/ StickyFriable/ Firm

jry- j5o6e/ Soft/ Hard


F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ Common/ Abundant Size Range:

Shape: Rounded/ Subrounded/ AngularStriated: Yes/ NoTypes:

USE BACK OP PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS l


General


Sample Number (s) : ^f —

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/flLncline level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terracedX.iindulati- namnlf* nlt-f* l orat-ion ; t-on/ hohhom/^BiTflp s^sample site location: top/ ^^^^

C) Slope: Inclination- /jf"T Aspect-^^^—~~f~3~~~~^

D) Drainagej^Well drained/ Moderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) VegetaC Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/

: State-xVl rgin//Logged/ Fired/ Stress:

F) Depth at which material sampled: /x



B) Texture: Sandr coarse;sandy// siltj

l fine '~ clayey

C) Structure^^S^ructureless^Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/Unated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet-


Nonsticky/ Slightly Sticky/ Sticky Loose/ Friable/ Firm Loose/ (Sof/Hard

ated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/ Common/ Size Range: -V^ f-? S/ 3

Shape: Rounded/ Subrounded/ Angular Striated: Yes/ No


FIGURE It EXAMPLE OP AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLB

General

Stop Number:

Sample Number (s)

Site Description

A) Material:

U.T.M. Reference:

f — Q f ~/ ^ 7 7 IT*-

Aerial Photo:

C J? ^ .C C/sJ-

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky/inclined^ level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ terraced/ undulating/ monger - sample site location: top/ bottom/ side:

C) Slope: Inclination- Jfi o ^____ Aspect- t^

D) Drainage: Well drained/Tloderately well drained/ Poorly drained

E) Vegetation: Type-^Coniferous/^Deciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/^^fifw^r^™"^^^T^^r *

: State-^Virgin/^Logged/ Fired/ Stress:



/HW/ UA) Colour:Munsell Code?

D) Texture: Sand- coarse /medium/ fine f~sandy'/ r^si l ty/x clayey

C) structure^Slrructureless/Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ Evenly lajp&aated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

Comments:

D) Consistency: Wet- Nonstickyf-Si4ghtiy Sticky/ Stickyfoisf^ Loose/^Friable/^ Firm

Loose/ Soft/ fiard

E) Cementation: Yes/No) - Weak/ Strong/ rrtdxJrated

F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Few/^Common/ Abundant Size Range: ^ f/

Shape : /Rounded/ (Subrpuêd/ AngularStriateî^Pes-/ Nb —Types:


FIGURE It EXAMPLE OP AN OBSERVATION FORK FOR OVERBURDEN SAMPLE

General


Sample Number(s)

Site Description

A) Material:

B) Surface Expression: apron/ blanket/ fan/ hummocky^ inclined/ level/ rolling/ ridged/ steep/ fcerrangd/ updulat-inLj/ uimi*Sr - sample site location: top/ bottom^sidej

C) Slope: Inclination- J \ *~'^-_______ Aspect-

D) Drainage: Well drained/ Moderately well drained/

E) Vegetation: Type-

: State

Poorly drained

eciduous/ Mixed/ Scrub/ Grass/

ogged/ Fired/ Stress:




D) Texture:

o-i/vCtf^yl

^ coarse/jnedium/ fine ; s andyvCs iTEjr clayey

/Structureless/ Rippled/ Cross-bedded/ Graded bedding/ aminated sand and horizontal bedding/ Flow

C) Structure

Comments:

D) Consistency: Weki--^ Nons t i cky/ Sprightly Sticky/ StickynK^ T-onnp/^Kriabla/ FirmFirm

Hard


F) Clasts: Abundance: Rare/ Size Range: ^ f f

Shape RqundedV/Sîbrounded/' AngularStriaTypes:

USB BACK OP PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR DIAGRAMS l

APPENDIX III

REPORT ON TILL ANALYSES

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED 107-15 CAPELLA COURT, NEPEAN, ONTARIO, K2E 7X1

TELEPHONE: (6,13) 226-1771/177*1 FAX NO.: (613) 226-8753

DATA TRANSMITTAL REPORT

DATE: O6-Oct-94

ATTENTION: MR. JOHN THOMPSON

CLIENT: JOHN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES 1279 Ingleside Drive Oakville, Ont. L6H 2J1

FAX NO.: (9O5) 844-2OO8 l Z-

PROJECT: T

FILE NO: JTHO1OCK.WRI

NO. OF SAMPLES: 18

GO l to 018

THESE SAMPLES WERE PROCESSED FOR: VISIBLE GOLD GRAINSKIMBERLITE INDICATORS

SPECIFICATIONS:-/HEAVY LIQUID SEPARATION SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 3. 2O

GOLD GRAINS ISOLATED IN CONICAL VIALS. -25O MICRON HMC SENT FOR ANALYSIS.

VALL SAMPLES PICKED FOR INDICATOR MINERAL GRAINS.•/ALL OTHER SAMPLE FRACTIONS ARE PRESENTLY STORED.

REMARKS:

-X^——t tf-~^——i^s-sWCRemy Huneault Laboratory Manager

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED - LABORATORY SAMPLE LOG

ABBREVIATIONS

DATA LOG

Clast;

Size of Clast: 6: Granules P: Pebbles C: Cobbles BL: Boulder Chips BK: Bedrock Chips

t Clast Composition:V/S: Volcanics and SedimentsGR: GraniticsLS: LitestoneOT: Other Lithologies

(Refer to Footnotes) TR: Only Trace Present NA: NOT APPLICABLE OX: Oxidized

Matrix:S/U: Sorted or UnsortedSO: Sand ———————l F: FineST: Silt l M: MediuiCY: Clay l C: CoarseOR: Organic*

Y: Fraction Present*: Fraction relatively tore abundant-: Fraction relatively less abundantN: Fraction Not PresentL: Luips Present

Colour;B: Beige PP: PurpleGY: Grey PK: PinkGB: Grey Beige OC: OchreGN: Green DOC: Dark OchreGG: Grey Green HOC: Hediui OchreBN: Brown LOC: Light OchreBK: Black

GOLD LOGT: Nuiber found on Shaking TableP: Nuiber found by panning

C: Calculated Thickness of Grain (in ncrons)M: Actual Measured Thickness of Grain (in ncrons)

KIM LOGGP: Purple garnet (69/610 chroie pyrope) GO: Orange lantle garnet; includes both eclogitic (G3) and Cr-poor legacryst (61/62)

varieties; in sou saiples, tay include a fen grains of conon crustal garnet(G5) lacking diagnostic inclusions or crystal faces.

DC: Chroie diopside, eierald green; paler green low-Cr diopside picked separately. IL: Picroilienite; in soie saiples, lay include a few grains of couon crustal

ilienite lacking diagnostic inclusions or crystal faces. CR: Chroiite

Page l JOHN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES 10/0

10/06/94PROJECT: TTOTAL OF 18 SAMPLES.FILENAME: JTHOIOCX.HRI

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED LABORATORY SAMPLE LOG

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

OASTS

SAMPLENUMBER

T 001002003004005006007008009010Oil01201301401501601701B

WEIGHT (KILOGRAMS)

BULKREFVED

7.155.154.754.354.604.253.456.255.407. BS3.905.609.105.806.554.607.157.70

TABLESPLIT

7.155.154.754.354.604.253.456.255.407.653.905.609.105.606.554.607.157.70

*2 iiOASTS

1.600.500.550.600.150.600.400.650.101.100.401.300.400.100.000.600.550.60

1-2 HOASTS

0.650.300.450.550.100.400.450.650.100.500.100.700.300.100.000.500.450.55

TABLEFEED

4.904.353.753.004.353.252.604.755.206.251403.606.405.606.553.306.156.35

S1ZE

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPNAPPP

)2.0 •i MATRIX

PERCENTAGE

V/S

6595956540601009595901009065100NA507060

GR

155515604005510010150

NA503040

LS

00000000000000NA000

OT

00000000000000

NA000

(1.0

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

S/U

UUUUUUSUUUUUUUSUUU

SD

YYYYYYtYYYYYYYtYYY

ST

YYYYYY-YYYYYYY-YYY

CY

YYYYYY-YYYYYYY-YYY

•l

COLOUR

SAND

BNOCOCOCLOCLOGOCLOCLOCLOCOCOC

LOCOC

LOCOCLOCBN

CLAY

BNOCOCOCLOCLOCOCLOCLOCLOCOCOC

LOCOC

LOCOCLOCBN

0 R6*

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

CLASS

TILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILL

GRAVELTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLTILLSANDTILLTILLTILL

page l JOHN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES 10/

10/06/9* PROJECT: T TOTAL OF

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITEDLABORATORY SAMPLE LOG

KIMBERLITE INDICATOR MINERAL COUNTS

16 SAMPLES

SAMPLENUMBER

T001002003004005006007006009010Oil012013014015016017016

TABLE CONCENTRATE (1.0 M (grais)

M. I. SEPARATION S. 6 3.20

TOTAL

242.9376.0179.9376.2305.7194.1103.7266.0309.1320.4316.5252.4398.2340.7456.3233.3472.5466.6

-0.25•i H. I.

LIGHTS

NA 207.7NA 336.3NA 173.4NA 356.2NA 293.4NA 191.3NA 102.4NA 269.0NA 290.6NA 282.5NA 311.6NA 226.8NA 311.9NA 329.7NA 364.6NA 217.3NA 440.8NA 429.6

TOTALNON-MAG

31.628.65.215.711.22.41.1

13.417.335.05.5

21.979.110.963.814.930.635.6

0.5 TO 0.25 TO1.0 li 0.5 li

1.2 3.00.6 2.6(0.1 0.60.6 2.30.1 0.60.2 1.0(0. 1 0. 10.7 2.50.2 0.21.0 4.20.1 0.51.6 3.21.3 4.0

(0. 1 0. 10.1 0.30.4 2.11.0 3.40.7 3.7

-0.25•i

27.425.24.612.810.51.21.0

10.216.929.84.917.173.810.863.412.426.231.4

TOTALMAG

3.611.11.32.31.10.40.23.61.02.91.23.77.20.17.91.11.11.2

KIM COUNT

0.5 TO

GP GO

0 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 10 02 05 10 00 00 00 01 0

1 H

DC IN

0 00 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 0

10.25 TO10.5 M1

CR 1 GP1

1 20 10 00 20 00 00 00 10 00 30 00 40 40 00 00 00 10 4

DC

000100010000100013

T l0T lA 1L l

KlMi 1t

320300030406

1100028

SflMPLE NO iPROJECT:001

Out1

004

005

OOfe

007

OOts

009

010

011

012

013

KIMBERLITE INDICQTOR MINERflL PICKING FOOTNOTES;

REMflRKS

SEM check of 5 splendent black grains from )0.5 mm — l chromite, as well as 3 crustal ilmenite and l iron oxide (returned to sample); SEM check of Z. pale emerald green grains from (0.5 mm — l low-Cr diopside and l Cr andradite (returned to sample); SEM check of 4 orange garnet from (0.5 mn — 3 Mn almandine and l Fe spessartine (returned to sample); picked 13 CR from (0.5 mm.

Picked 5 CR froa (0.5 mm.

SEM check of l intense emerald green grain from (0.5 mm — Cr diopside; SEM check of l brown translucent grain from (0.5 mn— diopside-hedenbergite (returned to sample); picked IS CR from (0.5 mm.

SEM check of 3 splendent black grains from JO. 5 mm — all crustal ilmenite (returned to sample).

Picked l CR from (0.5 mm.

)0.5 mn only 5 grains; picked 5 CR fron (0.5 mn.

SEM check of S pale emerald green grains froa '.0.5 mm — l Cr- diopside and l Ci—andradite; picked 3 CR froa (0.5 MB.

Picked 3 CR from (0.5 mm.

SEM check of 5 orange garnet form )0.5 mm — l Cr-poor megacryst, 3 Mn-rich and l Ca-rich almandine; SEM check of E orange granet from (0.5 mm — both possibly eclogitic garnet.

SEM check of l black splendent grain fron )0.5 aa — crustal iImenite.

Picked 10 CR from (0.5 BB.

SEM check of l reddish-purple crystal from )0.5 mm — possible pyrope with low-Cr or eclogitic garnet; SEM check of l orange garnet from )0.5 am — possible eclogitic; SEM check of 2 pale emerald green grains from (0.5 ma — both low-Cr to Cr diopside; SEM check of d reddish purple grains from (0.5 mm— both almandine (returned to sample); SEM check of 3 ornage garnet from (0.5 ma — l possible eclogitic GO, 2 almandine (returned to sample); picked c.' CR from (0.5 aa.

Only 10 grains )0.5 aa in size, and very snail (0.5 aa fraction.

015 Only 30 grains )0.5 aa in size.

KIMBERLITE INDICflTQR MINERRL PICKING FOOTNOTES;

3QMPLE NO; REMflRKS PROJECT:016 SEM check of l black splendent grain from J O.5 IB — crustal

ilmenite; picked 6 Cfl fron (0.5 BB.

017 Picked l CR and l picroiIsenite froa (0.5 ma.

016 SEM check of l splendent black grain froi )0.5 BB — crustal ilienite; SEM check of l pale eierald green grain froB (0.5 mm — Cr-diopside; SEM check of l pale orange garnet froa (0.5 BB — possible eclogitic garnet or Ci—poor aegacryst (lost in transfer to vial).

PwSE l JOHN THOMPSON ftND ASSOCIATES 10/05/94

OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED

GOLD GRAIN SUMMARY SHEETJTHU1GCT.WR2

Sacple Nuiber of Visible Gold Grains Non-Mag Calculated PPB Visible GoldNo. ===============•=================== Weight =================================

Total Reshaped Modified Pristine Total Reshaped Modified Pristine

001002oo3004005•X-'c-y-.' 7006009G 1 0•- 1 : i:- 1 iUl3

014-. * c'-- i -1

01 b01?Ola

2950D

k11019

2233H

619101561017

11315b801d15524

11ai2i

11

1217

1010(j15

21C.

tb2B493

5C*

00c.00o270020fcoo3

31.628.85.615.611.32. 31. 1

13.517.035. 0D. 1

22. 079. 110.863. 615.230.936. 1

36649096303

66101

0j: 3919010694121SO225110

21452109

2654793

2566740

3391429020*ic213500

1401270

114112

62760200

47156189469i^6

7^40

c- *J

-l

40i.)

2 M

•;0...

1IH

(.1(j0o1( 1

033

PHGE i JOHN THOHPSIN ftND ASSOCIATES 10/

GOLD CLASSIFICATION

VISIBLE GOLD FROM SHAKING TABLE AND PANNING

;:nuluCT.HR2TOTAL f OF PANNIN6S ———

NUMBER OF GRAINS

Y/N

MEASURMENT (uM) RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NON CALC V.G.— — — — — — .ye ,a ,e- —— — t ^ — — ^^^ j j . m w j^^j^jû^^^ — ,^g^^^^.^— j- —•-•-j- tiff ACCQV

DIAMETER THICKNESS T P T P T P GMS PPB REMARKS

001

002

003

O-')*

15 X15 X25 X25 X25 X25 X50 X50 X50 X75 X75 X75 X150 X

10 X15 X15 X25 X25 X25 X50 X50 X50 X75 X75 X75 X100 X300 X

15 X25 X25 X

225 X

25 X25 X50 X75 X

1525255075100507512575100125150

101525255075507510075100200125425

152550275

255050100

3C4 C5CBC10 C13 C10 C13 C16 C15 CIB C20C29 C

2 C3 C4C5 Cac10 C10 C13 C15 C15 C18 C27 C22C125 M

3 C5 Ca c

75 M

5CB C10 C18 C

2

121

1111

1

12

4334531

12

221

3111

22564 l l 3 l l l l l

NO SULPHIDES

29 31.6

l 4 2 7 756e3

l12 l

386

NO SULPHIDES

50 28.8

22l l

4909

NO SULPHIDES

fr303

NO SULPHIDES

PAGE 2 JOHN THOMPSIN AND ASSOCIATES 10/05/

GOLD CLASSIFICATION

VISIBLE GOLD FRON SHAKIN6 TABLE AND PANNING

JMI10CT.UR2TOTfiL * OF PANNIN6S ———

NUMBER OF GRAINS

SAMPLE f PANNED Y/N

MEASURMENT (uH) RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NUNmmm j__ mn ^^ - —___ ^--,, ___ ,- - , ----- ^-g,-——J— ftfyj

DIAMETER THICKNESS T P T P T P GKS

CALC V.6. ASSAY PPB REMARKS

15.6

OOfc

007

OOe

009

OSO

15 X15 X25 X25 X50 X50 X

15S25505075

3 C4C5CBC10 C13 C

1d.

311

N NO VISIBLE GOLD

N 50 X 75 13 C l

NO SULPHIDES

11 11.3 101

252550505050 X

15 X15 X25 X25 X25 X50 X

15 X15 X25 X25 X25 X25 X50 X50 X50 X

25505075100125

152525507575

15252550751005075100

5Ce c10 C13 C15 C18 C

3C4C5 C6 C10 C13 C

3 C4 C5CB C

10 C13 C10 C13 C15 C

1111

1

323113

211

1

2

1

1

1 11 2

1

1

335311

3

1 1. 1 33*

310

llA

1

9 13.5 190

52 7

4123

22 17 106

1 61 1 k1 2 1 10

311

2 i'31

NO SULPHIDES

NO SULPHIDES

NO SULPHIDES

PAGE 3 JOHN THOMPSIN AND ASSOCIATES

SOLD CLASSIFICATION

ViblBLE GOLD FROM SHAKING TABLE AND PANNING

NUMBER OF GRAINSJTH010CT.UR2TOTAL * OF PANNIN6S ————————————————————

MEASURWENT (uM) RESHAPED MODIFIED PRISTINE TOTAL NON CALC V.6. SAMPLE t PANNED ' ' " - --- ~ "'~' ''~ " MAG ASSAY

Y/N DIAMETER THICKNESS T P T P T P 6NS PPB REMARKS

33 35

Oil

013

015

016 N

6 C 13 C

5.1 121

017

15 X25 X75 X

15 X25 X25 X25 X50 X50 X

15 X25 X25 X25 X

15 X15 X25 X25 X50 X

15 X25 X50 X75 X

25 X

1525100

152550755075

152550100

1525255050

2550125150

50

3C5 C16 C

3 C5Ce c10 C10 C13 C

3 C5CBC13 C

3C4 C5Cec10 C

4 Cac

16 C22 C

ac

31

23212

3311

1

1

12

1

2 11 11

1 11

1 1

21 1 2

1 3 131

211

6

431

6 22

j

53141

19 79. 1

5311

10 10.8

24531

15 63. B

3111

6 15.2

6

50

22

51

10

214

NO SULPHIDES

NO SULPHIDES

NO SULPHIDES

NO SULPHIDES

NO SULPHIDES

JOHN THOHPSIN AND ASSOCIATES 10/05

GOLD CLASSIFICATION

v:SISLE GOLD FROM SHAKING TABLE AND PANNING

JTH01CCT.UR2 NUMBER OF GRAINS"'fiTfij 4 ne fiAtufucclUlHL f UT PHWilNbb

HEASURNENT

Y/N DIAMETER

50 X 5050 X 75

013 Y 15 X 1525 X 2525 X 5025 X 7525 X 12550 X 5050 X 75

100 X 100

(ufl)

THICKNESS

10 C13 C

3C5C8C

10 C15 C10 C13 C20C

RESHAPED MODIFIED

T P T P

21 1

1i l5 2

111

PRISTINE TOTAL NDN CALC V.6.—^— — — T., ^— — — *jr.r* /^'"•Aw————— ss —— MflG HioAY TP GKS PPB REHAKKS

22

10 30.9 52

1 NO SULPHIDES37

1 11 1

11 2

1

17 3b. l

APPENDIX IV

LIST OF CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS 1994


Swastika Laboratories P. O. Box 10 Swastika, Ontario POK1TO

Overburden Drilling Management Limited 107-15 Capella Court Nepean, Ontario K2E7X1

Brian Madill142 Carter AvenueKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N2A2

Thomas J. Obradovich Mineral Exploration Services 75 Balsam Avenue Kirkland Lake, Ontario P2N1W7

Bill Simpson 7 Day Avenue Kirkland Lake, Ontario

APPENDIX V



Brian Madill142 Carter AvenueKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N2A2

JVX Limited60 West Wilmot Street, Unit #22Richmond Hill, Ontario

APPENDIX VI

A LOGISTICAL AND INTERPRETIVE REPORT ON SPECTRAL IP AND RESISTIVITY SURVEYS CONDUCTED ON THE JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTY MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

(VOLUME 2)

32D05SWOO6O 2 16430 MORRISETTEl

020

A LOGISTICAL AND INTERPRETIVE REPORTON

SPECTRAL IP AND RESISTIVITY

SURVEYS

CONDUCTED ON

THE JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTY

MORRISETE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

TECHNICAL REVIEW * O ÂND

ASSESSMENT WORK REPORTON THE

MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP PROPERTYKIRKLAND LAKE AREA, ONTARIO

DECEMBER 31,1995

RECEIVEDVOLUME 2

f--.P 20 19 C ^

1INING LANDS B;-

J1 A LOGISTICAL AND INTERPRETIVE REPORT

ON

SPECTRAL IP AND RESISTIVITY

' SURVEYS

J CONDUCTED ON

j THE JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTYii MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

JVXLtd.

1 A LOGISTICAL AND INTERPRETIVE REPORTON

J SPECTRAL IP AND RESISTIVITYSURVEYS

J CONDUCTED ON

THE JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTY J MORRISETE TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

JJ For: John P. Thompson and Associates

1279 Ingledene Drive- Oakvile, OntarioJ L6H2J1

Tel: (905) 844-0220 Fax: (905) 844-2008

Attention: John Thompson

By: JVX Ltd. -l 60 West Wilmot Street, Unit #22J Richmond HiU. Ontario

L4B 1M6-j Tel: (905) 731-0972J Fax: (905) 731-9312

"j Contact: Blaine Webster

JVX Ref: 9565 Nov. 27, 1995

. ^

1

J VX 32D05SW0060 2 16430 MORRISETTE020C

3

3

33333333J

OF CONTENTS

l INTRODUCTION .1.1 GENERAL1.2 PURPOSE

2 DATA ACQUISITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22. l SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.2 PRODUCTION SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.3 PERSONNEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.4 FIELD INSTRUMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2.4. l IP Transmitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.4.2 IP Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3 DATA PROCESSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53. l IP AND RESISTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

4 INTERPRETATION METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74. l IP AND RESISTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

5 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

j vx

J

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure l : Location Map

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Survey Specifications for theIP/Resistivity Survey

Table 2: Survey Summary for IP/ResistivitySurvey (3=25 m)

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A: Background to the Geophysical Methods Appendix B: Plates

l

3 j vx

Plate l

Plate 2

Plate 3

Plate 4

J

l

LIST OF PLATES

Chargeability (m?) Stacked Colour Pseudosections

Resistivity (pa) Stacked Colour Pseudosections

Compilation Map

Chargeability (m7) and Resistivity (pa) Pseudosections (0=25 m)

One set of colour pseudosections Scale 1:1500 in one report.

j vx

33333313

l INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL

JVX Ltd. conducted time-domain spectral induced polarization (IP) and resistivity surveys from October 29 to November 4. 1995 on behalf of John P. Thompson and Associates. The survey was located on the John Thompson Property in Momsete Twp., Ontario (N.T.S. 32 D/4).

1.2 PURPOSE

The purpose of this survey was to locate new targets of base metal and gold mineralization.

SURVEY AREA

LOCATION MAP JOHN THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES

JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTY Morrisete Twp., Ontario

GROUND GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYScale: l : 1,725,000

~1 Sun-eyed by JVX Ltd.J Oct.-Nov., 1995 Figure l

J VX

J

2 DATA ACQUISITION

2.1 SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS

IP/Resistivity u

Transmitter

Receiver

Array Type

Transmit Cycle Time

Receive Cycle Time

Number of Potential Electrode Pairs

Electrode Spacing (a spacing)

Number of Lines Surveyed

Survey Coverage

Scintrex IPC-7/2.5 kW

ScintrexIPR-11

Pole-Dipole

2 sec

2 sec

6

25 meters

4 (0=25 m)

2650 metres (0=25 m)

lTable 1: Survey Specifications for the IP/Resistivity Survey

2.2 PRODUCTION SUMMARY

The total IP coverage was 2650 metres. The following table lists the survey coverage in detail:

.1 J VXLine

4OOW

700 W

1000 W

1300 W

From Station

850 N

375 N

375 N

575 N

To Station

425 N

450 S

300 S

150 S

Total

Distance (m)

425

825

675

725

2650

No. of

Readings

20

36

31

32

119

Table 2: Survey Summary for IP/Resistivity Survey (3=25 m)

2.3 PERSONNEL

J

J

Mr. Michel Fecteau - Geophysical TechnicianMr. Fecteau operated the Scintrex IPR-11 receiver and was responsible for data qualityand the day-to-day operation and direction of the survey.

Three field assistants were also engaged by JVX.

Aleksandra Savic (Geophysicist):Ms. Savic processed the data, prepared the plots, wrote the body of this report, and isresponsible for the data storage.

Dagmar Piska (Draftsperson):Ms. Piska did all manual drafting, prepared the compilation map. and assembled andbound the report.

Slaine Webster (President. JVX Ltd.):Mr. Webster provided overall supervision of the survey and the interpretation of the data.

mm

l

2.4 FIELD INSTRUMENTATION

JVX supplied geophysical instruments described below. Additional information about the geophysical methods can be found in Appendix A

•J""

1

1

JJ VX

2.4.1 IP TransmitterThe Scintrez IPC-7/2.5 kWTime Domain Transmitter powered by an eight horsepower motor generator was used. The transmitter generates square wave current output with a period of 4. 8, or 16 seconds. A digital multimeter in series with the transmitter is used to measure the magnitude of the current output.

2.4.2 IP ReceiverThe Scintrez IPR-11 Time Domain Receiver was used. This unit samples the voltage decay curve as measured by the potential electrodes at ten points in time. Readings are repeated until they converge to within a certain tolerance level, and the data are stored in solid-state memory.

j

-

i

. jvx

j 3 DATA PROCESSINGS irvey data were examined, corrected, and organized by the instrument operator, after

"l having been transferred to a field computer at the end of each survey day. The results w plotted on the following printers:

"l * STAR NX-80 colour dot-matrix printer-J - EPSON FX-80 dot-matrix printer

"l These plots were used to monitor progress and data quality, and to make an initial-* interpretation. Thus survey parameters and design were altered when necessary.

T The data are sent by courier to the head office of JVX in Richmond Hill. Ontario. They-l are processed and results are plotted on the following printers as necessary:

-| * NICOLET ZETA 36 inch pen plotter J - TEKTRONIX COLORQUICK ink jet printer

* FUJITSU DL2400 colour dot-matrix printer-i * TEXAS INSTRUMENTS MicroLaser Pro 600 Laser printer

The processing procedure is outlined below.

3. l IP AND RESISTIVITY

J Steps l and 2 are performed both in the field and at the head office. Steps 3 and 4 are performed at the head office.

J 1) The GEOPAK IPSECT Package was used to generate colour pseudosections of chargeability and resistivity data.

vx

JJ J J

2) The in-house JVX SOFT n Package was used to perform spectral analysis of the time-domain data. This step was crucial to maximizing the information which can be obtained from IP data. This software analyses the shape of the IP decay curve, giving information about:

(a) the qualitative grain size (indicated by the parameter t),(b) the uniformity of the grain size (indicated by c), and(c) the magnitude of the chargeable source (indicated by M-IP\.

(Please see Appendix A for more information about spectral analysis.)

3) The pseudosections from step 2 above were aligned in the AUTOCAD computer- aided drafting package and plotted.

4) Contoured plan maps of both chargeability and resistivity data from one dipole were produced using JVX in-house software and the GEOPAK Line Processing Package. Additional drafting on these maps was done through AUTOCAD.

3

JJ VX

] 4 INTERPRETATION METHODOLOGY

JVX uses its many years of experience in geophysical interpretation to extract the most accurate information from the data. The procedures involved are simplified for the sake of clarity.

4. l IP AND RESISTIVITY

The IP and resistivity data are interpreted using the following procedure:

Chargeability anomalies are picked on using the following scheme os a guide:

~] 1) Chargeability anomalies are picked on the pseudosections and classified

~j ____ Very Strong fc* 30 mV/V) and well-defined

____ Strong (20 to 30 mV/V) and well-defined

J _ _ Moderate (10 to 20 mV/V) and well-defined

-j . - - Weak (5 to 10 mV/V) and well-defined

. . . . . Very Weak (3 to 5 mV /V) and poorly defined

J x * ii x x Extremely Weak fc3 mV/V) and very poorly defined

-j The peak of the anomaly gives a qualitative indication of the depth to the J top of the anomalous source and the location of the centre of the body.

Where possible, the location and dipole number of the peak is written . ~ beside the anomaly bar.

2) The spectral characteristics of the anomalies are examined. The peak value _— of M-IP is noted, and T is classified according to the following scheme:

J ^x————————————————L Long fc 10.0 sec)

M Medium (1.0 to 10.0 sec)

S ShortK 1.0 sec)

3) Resistivity anomalies are picked on the pseudosections and classified using the following scheme os a guide:

no symbol VH(n) Very High fc 25 000 Qm) — highly silicified

no symbol H(n) High fc 10 000 Qm) — probably silicified

no symbol WH(n) Weak High fc 10 000 Qm) — relative increase compared to surrounding material

J _ _ SL(n) Strong Low — strong decrease in resistivity

— — — ML(n) Medium Low — medium decrease in resistivity

-* . WL(n) Weak Low — slight resistivity decrease relative tosurrounding material

-J where n is the dipole number at which the anomaly peak is located.

-l 4) The anomalies from steps 1) to 3) are marked on the compilation map.

"j 5) Resistivity anomalies on the compilation map are joined into conductive-l and resistive zones.

H 6) Zones of high chargeability are interpreted based on spectral, resistivity, J and geometric information.

-^ 7) The anomalies are rated according to JVX" past experience. The following J are some of the characteristics which may be indicative of economic

mineralization:

J * A moderate to high chargeability anomaly flanked by a narrow finger- shaped resistivity high.

J * High M-IP values fc 300 mV/V) which are not associated with a resistivitylow. indicating a large quantity of metallic sulphides).

1

1

* Low T values (short time constant), which indicate that the chargeable

8

j vx

source is disseminated and fine-grained. Gold mineralization is generally associated with fine-grained sulphides. However, in environments where the sulphides have been remobilized. gold mineralization may be associated with coarse-grained sulphides (long time constant).

* In particular, very high M-IP values ^ 900 mV/V) with short -t are the most favourable spectral IP targets.

33l

l

]l

3

l

l

J VX

5 DISCUSSION

The interpretation of the geophysical data was compiled onto a single map. This compilation map and all data plots are included in Appendix B.

The grid is located over swamp areas. Resistivity lows, outlined on the compilation map as RL-r. RL-1" and RL-2, are likely caused by a predominantly clay overburden. This clay layer has masked bedrock characteristics in much of the surveyed area.

] The relatively high resistivity area located on line 400W between 400N and 6OON coincides with bedrock outcrop. This area presents the highest chargeability values on the grid (up to 7.7 mV/V at 550N).

-i Although spectral data is not calculated for most of the survey area due to clay effects. MIP values of up to 160 mV/V and short time constant were computed in this area. It

] is uncertain whether the peak chargeability values at 550N represent a change in bedrock geology or the geometric effect caused by the swamp/outcrop boundary in this area.

The resistivities indicate the 25 meter electrode separation reached bedrock over most of the survey area.

Recommendation: Deeper penetration is required obtain additional bedrock information. A larger electrode "a"- spacing with 8 dipoles being read is recommended.

10

J] J

]3 j

313

JVX

If there are any questions with regard to the conducting of the survey or the interpretation of the data, please call the undersigned at JVX Ltd.

Respectfully submitted.

JVX Ltd.

] Aleksandra Savic. M.Sc.. B.Sc. Geophysicist

.t . :

Blaine Webster. B.Sc. President

-311

] APPENDIX A

-i Background

to the

Geophysical Methods

3

l J VX

J

l

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY

l THE IP EFFECT

The induced polarization (IP) phenomenon is primarily caused by.

1 ) electrical polarization at the boundary between the rock or soil and the pore fluids, and

2) electrical polarization at the boundary between metallic minerals (particularly sulphides) within pores and the pore fluids.

This polarization occurs when a current is applied across these boundaries. Its magnitude can be measured in two ways:

1) in the frequency domain (also known as phase IP), in which the applied current is sinusoidal, or

2) in the time domain, in which the applied current is a modified square wave.

JVX conducts IP surveys in the time domain because spectral analysis, a powerful interpretive tool, can only be performed in the time domain.

Generally, the current Is transmitted as a modified square wave with a period of eight seconds (two seconds positive, two seconds off. two seconds negative, two seconds ofi). The voltage measured in the ground will have the form shown in figure IP-1. The IP effect is manifested as a roughly exponential voltage decay after the current is turned off. similar to the relaxation effect of a discharging capacitor. The IP receiver samples this voltage decay curve at a number of points.

The SCINTREXIPR-11 receiver repeats and averages the following measurements until they converge:

Vp The primary voltage (the steady-state amplitude of the voltage while the current is being transmitted).

IP-1

JJ VXJ

T SP The self-potential (the steady state voltage when no current is beingtransmitted).

J mO to m9 The chargeabilities (measures of the IP effect at different times along the decay voltage curve Vs(t) ).

] Each chargeability value (mO to m9) is the ratio of the average secondary voltage over aac careay vaue m time window to the primary voltage. Mathematically, this is given by:

m = 1000 l Vs(t) dtl Vp(Vt,) J

t,

wherem ^ chargeability (in mV/V)

~| Vs(t) = secondary voltage (i.e. the voltage decay) ^ Vp = primary voltage

t, = beginning of time window "l tj = end of time window

The IPR- 1 1 uses the ten time windows, also known as time slices, listed in table IP- 1 and "l shown in figure IP-2. Unless otherwise stated, the term chargeability refers to the eighth J time window (m7).

i—i IP-2

T

Vp

SP l

CO

Vs(

t)

Figu

re

IP-1

:

The

I.P.

Wav

efor

m

X

J

l

l l

l

l

J VX

SLICE

mO

ml

m2

m3

m4

m5

m6

m?

m8

m9

DURATION (msec)

30

30

30

30

180

180

180oetvk ' S'-^y^KvJtHJ . VSf;; ::-'-;™

360

360

FROM (msec)

30

60

90

120

150

330

510^HSQfi^-*^ --ss;|?ry;: : ;--:;r:

1050

1410

TO (msec)

60

90

120

150

330

510

690

j 1050

1410

1770

MIDPOINT (msec)

45

75

105

135

240

420

6OO

870' -^1230

1590

Table IP-1 : Time slices recorded by the IPR-11 receiver

Nominal total receive time: 02.1.2.4 sec

MO-3 M4 MS M6

ttttt 61 61 6t

"7

12t

Me

121

M,

121 Window Width

.'Pfl-i; Iransienrtttndows

Figure IP-2 : IP effect decay curve with IPR-11 time slicesIP-4

l

3

3

j vx

2 SPECTRAL ANALYSIS

With the ability to sample the decay curve at a number of points, the shape of the decay curve can be analysed. This gives important information about the characteristics of the source.

Spectral analysis utilises the Cole-Cole model of the IP effect (Pelton et al.. 1978). This model uses the following four parameters (described in Johnson. 1984) to calculate a theoretical IP decay curve:

pa Resistivity (Qm)This quantity is described in detail later in this appendix.

M-IP Chargeability Amplitude (mV/V)This quantity is related to the volume percent of the chargeable source, although there is no simple quantitative relationship.

T Time Constant (seconds)The time constant is related to the grain size of the source. A short time constant (0.01 to 0.3 s) indicates a fine-grained source. A long time constant (30 to 100 s) indicates a coarse-grained, interconnected, or massive source.

c Exponent (dimensionless)A high value (e.g. 0.5) indicates that the grain size is uniform. A low value (e.g. 0.1) indicates that there is a mixture of grain sizes.

Conventional chargeability is a combination of these spectral parameters. A change in any one parameter will produce a change in the apparent chargeability. In the absence of spectral analysis, such changes are always ascribed to a change in the volume percent of the chargeable source, even though the cause may be a shiftfromfine-grained to coarse- grained material.

JVX has developed a software package called SOFT n which determines the spectral parameters by comparing the measured decay curve with a library of model curves. The quality of the fit is given as a root-mean-square difference (expressed as a percentage). A low value (e.g. l "/6) indicates high quality data of medium to high amplitude. A high value (e.g. greater than 10 (56) indicates poor quality or low amplitude data. If the fit is greater than 5 0/^, the spectral parameters are considered to be of poor quality, and therefore are usually discarded.

IP-5

JJ J JJ J

J VX

3 ARRAY CONFIGURATION

As mentioned above, a current must be flowing through the ground in order for the IP effect to occur. This current is applied using two electrodes, which are called C l and C2. and the voltage decay is measured using two potential electrodes. PI and P2. The distance separating PI and P2 is known as the a-spacing. or a, and generally remains constant during the survey.

The three most common electrode array configurations are:

1) GradientC l and C2 are located at an "infinite" distance (i.e. very far) from the grid, with one on each side. The potential electrodes move throughout the grid.

2) Dipole-DipolcC l and C2 are separated by a distance of o, and move along with the potential electrodes.

3) Polc-DipolcC2 is located at "infinity". CI moves along with the potential electrodes throughout the grid.

The gradient array allows for fast reconnaissance surveys. However, no depth information is obtained (described below), and the resolution is much lower because all of the ground between CI and C2 is energised. Furthermore, the current will be channelled through conductive zones, which could result in inaccurate chargeability and resistivity values. Thus, great care must be used when using a gradient array.

In JVX" experience, the pole-dipole array is superior to the dipole-dipole array. Since C2 is located at an infinite distance, a greater volume of ground is energised. This results in better depth penetration (i.e. higher quality data), and is particularly important in the presence of thick and/or conductive overburden. However, the pole-dipole array does not have the disadvantages of the gradient array. Since CI is located near the potential electrodes, depth information is obtained (see below), and resolution is high.

4 A-SPACING AND NUMBER OF DIPOLBS

The resolution of the data depends on o, the electrode spacing. The smaller a is, the greater the resolution. However, the depth of penetration is also smaller. A larger a results in greater depth, but less resolution. Thus, both factors must be considered when selecting the electrode spacing.

The standard pole-dipole array is shown in figure IP-2. Seven potential electrodes are used to measure the voltage simultaneously across six electrode pairs (P1-P2. P2-P3. P3-

IP-6

l

l l

J VX

P4. etc.). Each pair is labelled using an integer, n, where na is the distance between the first potential electrode and the nearest current electrode.

The depth of investigation is greater when the potential electrode pair is farther from the current electrode (i.e. larger n). However, a greater separation distance also results in greater signal attenuation, limiting the number of dipoles which could be used effectively.

5 RESISTIVITY

The DC apparent resistivity (pa) is a measure of the bulk electrical resistivity of the subsurface. Electricity flows primarily through the groundwater within fractures and pore spaces. Therefore, fault zones can be detected as low resistivity zones. However, sulphide minerals, some oxides, and graphite are also good conductors and so produce low resistivity zones. The current flow is electronic in these minerals rather than electrolytic as it is in groundwater. Sometimes, the geometry of the low resistivity zone can distinguish between a fault zone and a mineral source. In other cases, additional geological information is needed. Silicates, the most common rock forming minerals, are very poor conductors of electricity, producing high resistivity zones.

The resistivity is measured simultaneously with the IP data. For a homogeneous and isotropic subsurface, it is given by the following formula:

wherepa = apparent resistivity (Sim)Vp = primary voltage (measured while current is on) (mV) k = k-factor (m)

The k-factor is an array-dependant component. For a pole-dipole array, it is given by:

k ^ 2itn(rH-l)a

wheren ^ dipole multiple (dimensionless) a - electrode separation (m)

J Although the assumption of a homogeneous and isotropic earth is unrealistic, the calculated value of pa can be used qualitatively to map changes in rock type (even to identify the rock type in some cases), and to map low resistivity fault zones.

IP-7

.J l J VX

JReferences

Johnson. I.M. Spectral I.P. Parameters as Determined through Time Domain Measurements, pp. 1993-2003 Geophysics 49. 1984

Johnson. I.M.. B. Webster. R Mathews. and S. McMullan Time Domain Spectral IP Results from Three Gold Deposits in Northern Saskatchewan. The Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, Feb. 1989

Pelton. W.H.. S.H. Ward. P.O. Hallof. W.P. SUI. P.H.Nelson Mineral Discrimination and Removal of Inductive Coupling with Multifrequency IP. pp. 588-6O9, Geophysics 43. 1978

.1

J

l

1

J APPENDIX B

•~i "" Plates

J

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentend Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Numoeri A/it, *0. o oo x iPersonal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mir this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Minis Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

32D05SW0060 2 16430 MORRISETTEInstructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment wore or consuu nw Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Grou- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to. must accompany

p t f\ *^ * l Q 4any this form. * f\

\/

Recorded Hotdar(s) Client No.

TetophoneNoTAddress e /o 7 aTownship/Area .

A/arv/ s* #*M or G Plan No.Mining Division

/-ofJe*. "Top -Stort?^ From: To: A-e

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group

i/ Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work, Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

TypejX jX* J rf l Jp 'fJ C10 A Sil 0 fa

RECEIVED

, FEB20 1996

MINING LANDS BRANCH

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

IV-Z- Co* i fa kle*d /ah Otd-6,,0

JVX

x ~rL* ohv^ -(or

(attach a schedule If necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sidel certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.

01" l lf* 11/li '(Signature)

Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of

For Office Use Only

0241 (03/91)

li•c'1

^0

\

S^

•H

|i

I

fiS*

Ii{

i1

|"0V.

*

V

\JS)NJ

-

Q \

ft^^

^

V0ovi

a

^

NO(AJ

NO No

*

NO

Ob

u

NO

3^

1

X) TV

c\

1NO

-

8S

if

• i

l|a|

V^

^V

(N

0

iiX)^^^^ ^^

-

^Q^

ov

VN^^0

VVJ

V)

0c

H

^•0

0

XVi

•H

^Q

0

1

V

V00

O

Oo

^^^0

\

zo0

\

HCI0

Value of Assessmen Work Doni on this Clalr

3 ~

Oof|

3fiS

^

^

*

X^^^

TSv

Nl

ÛA

^

xfiN

Is1

^

^

0

u,

to

V^^^

V^

HVU)

!sl-f 3 * 5

M

S. So J

HP

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

1 . D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.

e*~j'u^ -jr**** nfy^-JbIn the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1 : Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

Signature Date

Onta/m

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Alines

Mlnistere du DeVeloppement du Nord^•f -*—— ——VI O98

Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditttat des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Lol aur lea mines

Transaction NoJN* de

DOCUMENT NO

Personal Information collected on this form to obtained under the authority of the MMng Act. TMs Information wll be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining dairies). Questions about this collection should be directed lo the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 159 Cedar Street Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (70S) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contemn dans la present* formula sort recueMsenvertudelalurfsurlesinlnesetservirontatenlra)ourunregWre des concessions mlnieres. Adresser toute question sur la coKece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains mintors, mlnistere du Devetoppement du Nord at des Mtoes, ISO. me Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costa/CoOts directs

Type

Contractor's and Conauttant's

Drone del •ftWOproOMITet d* I'expert-

SuppMss Used FouniJfufM

Rantal Location tfe

Description

Labour Maln-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur to terrain

12*.?

Type

Amount Totato Montant Total global

'K&7

Total Direct Costs Total des couts direct*

2. Indirect Coata/CoOta Indlrecta* * Note: When dahnlng RehabntaUon work Indirect costs are not

adowabto as assessment work. Pour to remboursemert des travaux de rehabilitation, tos couts mrjrects ne aont pas admtsstbtos en tent que travaux d'evaluation.

Amount Montan!

Totals Total global

Transportation Transport

R E C E l

MINING LANDS

Food and LodgingNoun Nine et

MoMnzetlon and Pamobitfellun

' Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total psftM des coOts Indlrecta

Vatour toWe du ere*

Amount AHowabto (not greater than 20H of Direct Coats) Moment admtoaMe (n'excMant pas M H des coOta directs))Total Value of AM (Total el Mrect end aidhact coats) (Taw

MM

-MDon HBWBl- - - ixl^^W

--————f/?,

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed In this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. H verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work al or part of the assessment work submitted.

: Le tftutolre enregistre sera tenu de verifier tesdepensesdBmandess dans le present etat des coOts dans tes 30 Jours sutvant one demande a cet effet. SI la verification n'est pas eftectuee. le mlnlstre pout rejeter tout ou une parUe des travaux d'evaluation presented.

Filing Discounts Remises pour depot

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 1004fe of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

1. Les travaux deposes dans tes deux arts sutvant tour achevement sort remtoursesalOOttdetevatourtotatosusnienfonneaducrM

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SOW of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimedx 0.50 -

2. Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou dnq ans apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 St de la vatour totato du credit devaluation susmentkmne. Vok tos cateuls cl-dessous.

Vatour totato du credN d'evakiabonx 0.50

Evaluation Mate demandes

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des coOts

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying ReportLolWork form.

that as

to make this certification

J'atteste par la presente :que tes montants Indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont et* engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formula de rapport de travail d-Joint.

l am authorized Et qu'a titre de Je suls autofis*(Mulalre enraQlstr4. rapraMnlanl. posta occupA dana la cwii|jaQiria)

ft faire cotte attestation.

OZ12 (04(91) Nota : Dana cetta mrratto. lorsqu'll daslgna das parsonnas. to masculln ast utniae au sans nautra.

CLIFFORD TWP.

Kiloinelnm

MorriooUe Twp. Project.

I.F.GF.ND

1051315 Ontario Limited


CLAIM MAP

MORRISETTE TWP

JPT . 32D/IJ l'1CIGUKI 2

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

l (A) 9680 * oo

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information wHI be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264. f\ -~

^r i fr"C f 1 ^^ f\

Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate. * O V/- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)WorkGroup

l/ Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work. Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

SSkrA^CTiAssays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

ffeopltUi+fcvY**! ; /M*3- uc^jTP.

ON 18 ONLYREHFI VFD

~ FCD20 1996 ——

MINING LANDS BRANCH

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

t f 2 Cc r'lW fa* , ft ft/on J /.off*.

-3V

n P- fa** c. Ml

"* J*Av P.(attach a schedule If

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side

l certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or atte' its completion and annexed report is true.

l certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.

Certification of Work Report

0241 (0*91)

NO

—Qit

cQ Sa 90 : ~

lir

isi i3 a

X m*i!

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (*") one of the following:

1. G Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

Signature Date

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Devetoppement du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment CreditEtat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

l *^^^v^w*v rr.jreaction totfC 4de transaction

DOCUMENT NO. \ju 9680

Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

2. 164 30Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente forrnule sent recueillis en vertu de la Loi sur le* mines et serviront a tenir a (our un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute quesiton sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers, ministere du Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar, 4® etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs

Type

Wages Salaire*

Contractor's and Consultant's Fees DrolUde ('entrepreneur et d* I'expert- conseil

Supplies Used FoumltunM utilises

Eûlpfiiont Rental Location deIIMtvfffW

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreRetd Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

T*TPSvr*/*/o.a r /'m xJ/TTS/'V\o.*lXI.*.r'"r'"y.

/.i^v^y.//6*^**V-'/2.^;y x-toz)

Type

Type

Amount Montan!

^8A5/?

^/?r

Totals Total global

——

?m.

- —

-r-'Total Direct Costs f 9t2/,

Total des coOts directs | '^V

2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indirect** * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work.Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, tes couts indirects ne sont pas admissibtes en tarn que travaux d'evaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourriture et

Mobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et

Amount Allowable ( Montant admissibleTotal Value of Asse (Total of Dbect and l Indhaet etMtal

Description

Type

RECEI

-- FEB201

MINING LANDS

Sub Total of Indii Total parttel des coOto

not greater than 20H of Ok (n'excedant pet 20 H desssment Credit Vatourtota JtowaMe d'evahutto

rroMdMo

Amount Montant

/ED

)96

JRANCH

reel Costs i indirectsvet Costs) xxtts directs)JeducnMK n

Totals Total global

/

/

\J*L

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le titulaire enregistre sera tenu de verifier tes depenses demandees dans le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demands a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presentes.

Rling Discounts Remises pour depot

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 100*ft of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achevement sont reTnboursesi100%o^lawJeurtotatesusrne^t)onneeducredKd'evatuation.

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 50*M) of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimedx 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 •M) de la valour totale du credit d'evaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Valeur totale du credit d'evaluation Evaluation totale demandeex 0.50 -

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

Attestation de I'etat des coOts

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux d'evaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la forrnule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

that as l am authorized Et qu'a litre de . je suts autorise(titulaire enregistre. representant. poste occupi dans la compagnie)

to make this certification

0212(0*191) Nota : Dans cane formuw. kxsqu'il ddsigne des ] nnes. le masculin est utilise au sens neutre.

CLIFFORD TWP.

MORRISETTE TWP.

Kilometers

LEGEND

MorrtKtU Twp. Project.

Gold Insight Resources Ltd


CLAIM MAP

MORRISETTE TWP

JPT 32D/4. 320/5 FIGURE: 2

OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

April 30, 1996

Geoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.16430 Transaction f: W9680.00081

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development 6 Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Mr. Spooner:

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDIT ON MINING LAND, CLAIM(S) 1193297 (ET AL.) IN MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP(AREA)

Assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form accompanying this submission. The credit has been approved under Sections 12, 14, 17, Geology, Geophysics (MAG,VLF,IP), Assays, of the Assessment Work Regulation.

The approval date is April 24, 1995. Please indicate this approval on the claim record.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Bruce Gates at (705) 670-5856.

Yours sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mines and Minerals Division

Enclosure:

cc: Resident GeologistKirkland Lake, Ontario

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario

OntarioMinistry of Ministeredu Geoscience Assessment Office Northern Development Developpement du Nord 933 Ramsey Lake Road and Mines et des Mines 6tn ploor

Sudbury, OntarioP3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

April 30, 1996Our File: 2.16430 Transaction /: W9680.00084

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development 6 Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Mr. Spooner:

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDIT ON MIMING LAND, CLAIM(8) 1159964 (ET AL.) IN MORRISETTE TOWNSHIP(AREA)

Assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the Declaration of Assessment Work Form accompanying this submission. The credit has been approved under Sections 14, 17, Geophysics (MAG,VLF,IP), Assays, of the Assessment Work Regulation.

The approval date is April 24, 1995. Please indicate this approval on the claim record.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Bruce Gates at (705) 670-5856.

Yours sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands SectionMines and Minerals Division

BIG/jl Enclosure:

cc: Resident Geologist \/Assessment Files Library Kirkland Lake, Ontario Sudbury, Ontario

. REFERENCES IARIAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.* S. - MIMING AND SURFACE RIGHTS

D***riptMMi ?** Dtt* Dtcpotition

.7* S 3 79 S R ftM[R

Sec Hou 36/83- MWW 56/8O - *O MHO.

F.I*.

.60703

I607O5

SAND and GRAVEL

GRAVEL FILE 46122

THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED PROM VARIOUS SOURCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED. THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE

•: LANDS SHOWN HEREON.

NOTES

Surface rights on Mining Claim L 10772 temporarily withdrawn. .File: 43155

;Mining Cloims outlined thus h -1. . ore subject to rights and privileges granted by Mining Court Order — April 1,1946. File: 19697.

NOTICE OF FORESTRY ACTIVITYTHS TOWNSHP l AREA FALLS WITH* THE ——— TUMSKAMJNG MAHAGCMENT UJfT "~

OPfMTIONS. THEMNR UNT FORESTER FOR TrtS AREA CAN BC CONTACTED AT: P.O. BOX 129

SWASTKA, OUT.POKITO7OS-642-3&2

Bisley Twp;l M 2 M

rv

Columbus r Loltt

5M

"D

O

CDCD

l 1205425 J ————— T J2233071187276

1205570

1200796

1187255

1193298

S 1103367p— .— j

H87257 1193297 11932991203419

1202662

1203420-, j-—. — — —. —— — — -.-r l 1193296

sdabB-i M87258*1203368

, ,- i i 1203422^! 11*9292*1159293 II93296 | .....,— l---1--+--*

|'20?349

^-"-^--y^Hr---|-L--(-4— _,J J;! 101*306 ' .016310 l 10163.l l I048S04

l 0/^0-7 -3 C12027351202782 1202734

w ^SVCi-^V--\m\ JO S*Sjlp^.^L l--® i

l 1013716 IIOI97I7I-- —-fir—-T---

V i 1015714 l 1015713,101571*^- —X,-

804083^804(7^ | 7*7971 ! 78 797o! ^ J

8040*4) 804O8. '767972 (7679731 ^f l y

^-. ' ——.L-.J.^/-'——— Ut-L J L l L li IjfL l. \. * J ae 06)38JI865IQ

IIH*30 ll.929 UM926 11.1929

Victoria

104*77*'10487741 ii 047221 802/^42 i 802833 l 002*37

Goodfish

Lebel TwpCOPY OF THIS MYLAR ARCHIVED MAY.04/92ARCHIVED MAY 31. 1994

LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER ROADS

TRAILSSURVEYED LINES

TOWNSHIPS. BASELINES ETCLOTS. MINING CLAIMS PARCELS ETC

'JNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY LINES NON PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODINGOR FLOODING RIGHTS :

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSlTt PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT. SURFACE 4 MINING RIGHTS .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY .MINING RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE. SURFACE 4 MINING RIGHTS" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY , ,.

" . MINING RIGHTSONLY

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ORDER IN COUNCIL

RESERVATION

CANCELLED

SAND 8. GRAVEL .......

SYMBOL

®or f)

eo

Q o' m. B. B

L.O.orT

OC

GIR T -l MAY 6NOTE MINING RIGHTS IN PARCtlS PATfcNTtP

1*13 VESTtD IN ORixINA. PArtN'ft B- Tut PljBL.f LANDS AC l H SO '9'O CHAP 38O St C 63 SuBSfC l

SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

FEfO 10OO 2OOO 4OOO 6000 8OOO

O ' 2OO METRES

10OOi l KM'r

2OOO

^....JiAM-

2-164 a D/VTE OF iSSUF

TOWNSHIP 4 r'EB 2 1996

LARDS; L W

M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

KIRKLAND LAKEMINING DIVISION

LARDER LANLAND TITLES/ REG

TIMISKAMING

E C E f Y ESTRY DIVISION

FER 20 W

Ministry of LandNatural ManagementResources Branch^ ^

Ontario

|lfl * JANUARY 1985

cmcuuirED FEB. 26.090 G-3217

32D05SW0060 2 16430 MORRISETTE 200

aiiasiaaon OEWI z ogooMSSoaze

S66I 030 :31VQ

•zHI t- 13 :AON3n03dd

'*!|0douuv '.NOIlVOCn HUNVaS SGMVl

9661 O Z 83 j "-VIVO QBlldOMd l

1INP 91-W3 'd'TA ..SOINOSQ,, :Q3Sn

rd WHOP5^1* 1 I2~ ——fi—"

l. . s^*s

NVId NOIiVOOl

21 - ~ - — - — — — -l-;- —~— — — — ~

—o ——————^ -.-r2.*.sfsO-'s-———— *- *n"z--*

QN3O31

86*--—- - — 5?--i..Z9* — -

T- — — — — — — — O —4 — 6~

~-.^ — ,.—— —'-—y**e*--j — --* — — -^-^ oi4-* " '^ * j; w ^-~

. " * ^"^ -z*~— —^~^J " ""0" *

. VT ~~— ~——-^J*.^ \

— — — —Q — -91--—— — — — —\

—-,.?vi..Ju—————~" 9'* --O -.1 — —I-J OH— — — — — — — ——Q

-O——————— 9* 9*_—— ———— 2'-"—— - — — - — —-J1-1'—^ '"

——^"]' ~T^———zrrrzr-rr-i.%.1 —*f— — — -^ — — — ~ ^^

----^ ^^*~ *- -l ~i*~ ~ ~ ~ — — ——l-, 6*— —-— — ————gr

~~ ~~ T "~ "~~^^^^

6* — — — — — — — — i-i;fi*-— — -

A1-^v\ ^ ___ JL'lj1- , g* l_____________B *r -- '

———-——i ————————v———n — ~~ — -* ^ ^ e*"*- \\ B+-9- i.*- — — - — — — — or; rfi*~ .

j 7 — ._____*'-9- ^---,^ 9.J-i- r — " "" N^^--Jl'* -1 z 4'O 81 4

- — — -4-- — — — 0-jrE

if.^m.^.. **

'

-,

-70 +-4S+-35

LEGEND

SFR F li FtR VALUES

FRASER FILTER CONTOURS

CONDUCTOR AXIS

NSTRUMENT USED: GEONICS VLF EM'16 UNIT

TRANSMITTER STATION USED :

STATION: N.S s.LO CAT ION: Annapolis, Maryland

CO.-nRDIN^T-EJS.L LA T N38 0 59' LONG W 76 0 26'

32DOSSW0060 2 16430 MORRISETTE

.-6

; t r 4

i i t t f l r t t T l

'' t M l * ? f l

M i.. . r-

1 1

t 11 i n , r j

t t M t j r j T J

M * t. t r j

411 r t r

x x * , i i 1 1

S i i * l

i t H t

t * l 4 t f

S

v

AN

i M l r

, O 4 l t, t

2.164 30L-ECTF*OI\XIXX.GSIMETIC

(VLF EM-16 SURVEY)

(FRASFR FILTERED CONTOURED DATA)

32D/4 , 32 D/5

B H. MADILL

B . H M A DI LL

DEC., 1995

---H

• 97 t--8 my'"

•24

• 14 liM-/,1

tl

^/r 1 /

1 OOmfXI '•'-B-21

B.l - Ol

09 (O

JlA

J(O

*4 .1*7

' *6

l i'#

*7

*4

*3 * o

JA!

l

5

-1

ft

J* ft

J

(Oft

Jft ft

J .•f

f J

O (V

••fi-*4 m

-s

*6 *2H

*3- f* -5 l li

lill

,-rj, -

.L

A-. B *4

/l*9 r ?*2

*6

0)

- B tl

-0- *8

\-.,:-X x !

*9 .1*6 M

B*S

•is r*2"

••U-1•19" -2

;l k

•13- I-7B

1 "l1•g.11

•3*11 1"i1

l11•3

•2

•B

1

^B -S *B

'1 i* -8 *3 '

i j* -4 *3 ;l 1

1-2 *S !l 1

11•0 *-4

B 0 + B

-1 *S

1

-1 tlO

L ' *T

B 0L ,ii:,i, *L J

ii• -2

*8-1

its

i-B o *e r

l\ 0 *8

\OB *7 h; i/M - r

i-

-2 * 8 L'

|B-l 1 10 H

J;...

1* *T

i] iB *3

\

1

B *l

B *3;*7 .0 *7j;

' , f 1; i

B -2 *4

\\ .

B * 1

.0

,:Jv"\•16^-2 *

l - M j-B -2

\-l**

-78-r*26

-128

•16'

•-15 1

,*-i8-r*3i/r/-361

-64

-33 r* 1\"\7

• ir -j^ rio

\j '••16 ' l

\-.9

.

"-IIM20

.\\

j

•2

•2

— 0

•IB '1

•14- 1

l1

B i *|Q

l 11 'J 1* -* 7

l

-I8-*20

î -H9

\[3 if-tlg

t

1^!2 t-*ie^

r ''1 *r*t4 *

li' i lT/* 10 \/

**3 **4

-2Bf O

-3 *h -2

-5 f f -B

r r

m

•29 r-fl "

\•36 "26

.H80--I3

Accessoble liith 4-wheel drivevehicle to approximately this point.

f \ '\ f-40 B ' *67

^v /"'f '"'t X i *45

/' ^X/t"" 7 i '"-82 , -/f 1 *47

-24

-26

tiifL

x" ^^\ x 7 '--"^ ! N 7 /

•34 f- *28 ' B ' .124

-K \ ,.'M9!-2? i \ \ *S7

-20

-2S

1 ,r ' l - i i \l o t I.,\ v,\N

i- -4 -2"1 X 1

f^ -S "4 B-

l1 -6 -4 B-

L ^N^~ f"~*^~-^. ^^^-v -3 *^-— HH^t

r* 6 " 8 VL |--4 -4/^.!r *g ^x^" 'S'*^ *

.^cUf"/ ^^-9^ -7,'

" \-M -SB-

- i

--I4\ -8 '

r x r1 l4 \ " 8f - \x x i.y,. ^ \ -T.

f x \ ' \\ -1

1f-

* i

• i

\0\

:\N" \\ -

\ \- -4 . '~^L.

^s^ .y, ^^ '"^^^_J^^.' "' 7^ ^^x/

i^^ *J^-4 tj

-

-2 ' , .

0 -9

.-3 -1.

.-4 -12

-4 ''Z

'

-4 -"

*z

* 1

0-,f

3 *

1k

\, li2 ' B

i]f 1

j1! i14.

B

| j" -

l 1f 1

1' -!l

\IB

\,

j l

1!-.1 *

•2'.- -2

h -4

^-6

-

i *JB .r^1"• -7

I. Tk —— I ——— 1 ——— r-

- O

--2

--2

••J1 4l. (

•B

^ 2

0 1•"/'-4 B

-4 B

.i j-6*

\1-2 i

"^^^——^ __ j

"' i i

- 1

, *i

-4!

1-6 B

1-6 B

1-6 B

1--j1

M \/t- AB '*8 *l

r*8 -2i

!i, ..a . 8i '\l••.4 *i

ir4 'i(M

-1 -2

-

•V ' ~- . -ix-?-4 ' *2

"4 i i *l

10 -S"

0 -3"

,1

0 +I

' "2 * 1

J- 1

r ?*. 1\ !/!- -t1'"li '

L.J.]i" -2

- -2

0

1*1 ,

,fi *2

H"* 3 )i'

l•2',,{

I

*2V

l''

\..,

1 -8"

-4 "

\0

t|

*4

1"ii

t,!f i i•2 j

1 1

1-4 B

-2 i

- 1 i--

-1

0

' \r ^ \ ,M [U *I2 B -lg

r Vr ' " "\!., o!11* *4 *l

Jj 0 "Ti /^f 2 -s.' l

\ 1 \i-' \, \}

..|ir

- 2 *20'i

l ™

^- *6 *I3 f

r *8 -7B h

*7 -IDS r\

•7 *3 HI

A*6 '*' t

i \ ^""l "\•"i r ,j \

• •10 *2I

1 l. t 6 *43

1

- *6 *3,

| ^^^•4 B -46

\\*4 B -32

\ \

\ V-2 B -SB

J ,\\ 1-. B f 6 -2 *

i 1i" 0!• •ii *i

;. *6 Oj

-9 0 (

1

- ii ir/ \--•IS- -lOi

ii/.. -8\

'K \i- **6 * 0

- "*8 " 0

^•^•12 *7

1i- . *6 -21

X\ x•*ll B -14

'l \i- rH2 -7BJ f- ;*IO B -17

'i. \.,r . , , , , ,

"L -S-i . lr- *4 *8 -1 1

|1*4 *9-1 1

i• 4 *9 -

J

i i 1- 1 J*,. Jh /'

1*-*!3-

1 :1 ;

-J '1 :

1l** 1 ;

' 1r ii** i/*j i- i- 1 ii ii 1•*iflj. ,,j'.mlrf

" * * 6 M

i \• •i i\ i-B -2 '-\ ;-1-8 J-j 1- " -4 .ij/ i

OOOmrM

-6B

-3 B

2-OOmfsl

B* *S 1 O O m INI

LliSIE O

-7B.--S

LEGEND

CM-l

-7

*io ;

*IS '

•9

-3 B

-2 " O

.*3

1 OOmS

-2 -Q

B O

V*-!5y.

32D05SW0060 2.16430 MORRISETTE230

-SO -28 9 *2S *Sp

VERTICAL SCALE l cm - 25%

-*——*- IN PHASE ( Dip Angles )

-——-- OUT of PHASE (Quadrature)

INSTRUMENT USED: "6EOWics" V.L.F. EM-IS UMIT

TRANSMITTER STATION USED!

STATION : NAA

LOCATION: Cutler, Maine

FREQUENCY: 24.0 KHZ.CO-ORDINATES: LAT. N44"39'

LONG. *6Te l7'

- 17

*I2

+231--32 B

"v 3OOmS

•76 i- -28

i

l

m

l

1-42

• -32

-30

-21

D

l

j ESKER f LAKES

PROVINCIAL!

PROPERTY LOCATION

J OWN P, THOMPSON

(VLF EM-16 SURVEY)

•B-E-CEIVEP

FEB201996 4•^•a B B^^ * BP^""^-^ *

l DATA)

PROJECT:

N.T. S. : 32D/4 8 32D/5

DRAWING No.:

SCALE:too

300

DATA BY: D.R. MADILL

DRAWN BY: B.H. MADILL

DATE: DEC. 1995

REVISIONS DATE BY

Accessable with 4-wheel drivevehicle to approximately

4OOrrtrsl

L l rsi EL O

l S r1 PROPERTY LOCATION

LEGEND

i Townof

kirkland Lake/-FRASER FILTER

** NUMBERS

l V,LOCATION PLAN

FRASER FILTER CONTOURS

INSTRUMENT USED! GEONICS V.L.F. EM-16 UNIT(VLF EM-18

D

TRANSMITTER STATION USED :

STATION: NA A

LOCATION: Cutler , Maine

FREQUENCY: 24.0 kHz.N.T.S. : 32D/4 , 32 D/5 DRAWN BY: B. H. MADILLCO - ORPIN A TE SA LAT. N 44O 39

LONG. W670 17'

32D05SW0060 2.16430 MORRISETTE

8OOmffM

VOOmfSI

with 4-wheel drive approximately this point

5OOmlSI

4OOmlN|4OOmlSI 4OOmrsi

OOmlM 1 OOmlVI

71 656 646\ 674 686—-^6V 664 67* 660 661 684 665 665 649 654

OOmS

PROPERTY LOCATION

MORRISETTE

/' TWP./,, 7 XAJ X x / .' / X ,

irkland Lake

3OOmS

LOCATION PLANISOMAGNETIC LIMES

h! V tU

MAGNETIC DEPRESSIGMINING LANUS BHANUH

2.164 30INSTRUMENT USED: GEOMETRICS MODEL 6816ffirtable Proton Magnetometer

63i•- —60 O"^—"*1" TOT

(CONTOURED A CORRECTED DATA)NOTES: (l) One nT ( nanoTesla)5 one gamma(2) Total Field * 57.000 * station value

32D/4 . 32D/5 B. H. Madill

DEC. 1995

32D05SW0060 2.16430 MORRISETTE6OOm

CO

CO

32D05SW0060 2.16430 MORRISETTE 260

m CDrooCD CDen

JJm o m

m

•MM

W H

4HM

•MM

M**

5.0850

1,8350

1.3080

1.1670

1.0820

1.0090

.9590

.8060

.8500

.7930

.71BC

.6310

.5290

.4010

JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTYOPAP 1995

MORREETE TWP.. ONT. N.T.S. 32 D__

CHARGEABILITY (m?) COLOUR IMAGES

SURVEYED BY JVX LTD. U9HC SCtNTREX IPft-11 Rx ; PC-7/2.5 HW Til

PALI 1995

m no

METRES

PLOTTED B1-A.S.

NOV. 1995SCALE 1:3000 PUTE 1

32D05SW0060 2.16430 MORRISETTE 270

w

tiif.2Qi—•z.O

CD2Zox

-nmCDro

CDCOCD

IDmom

mD

•MN

W* K

4MN

VON

23182.00

IVfU.WU

706.00

580.00

502.00

444.00

396.00

3 W. 00

320.00

28B.OO

258. OC

224.00

(W.00

162.00

JOHN THOMPSON PROPERTYOPAP 1995

MORRISETE TWP.. ONT. N.T.S. 32 D——

RESISTIVITY COLOUR IMAGES

SURVEYED BY JVX LTD. USING SOMTFEX IPR-11 Rx : IPC-7/2.5 kW Tx

FALL 19BS

METRES

R.OTTEDBYA.S.

NOV. 1990SCALE 1:5000 PLATE 2

o o

900 N

800 N

700 N

600 N

500 N

400 N

300 N

200 N

1 00 N

100 S

200 S

300 S

400 S

500 S

O Oo

o oK

Oo

l32D05SW0060 2.16430 MORRISETTE 280

RL-2

COo

o/c oy co/co/co/c o/c o/c

O O

O Oo o o Oo

i

aO503

O

900 N

800 N

700 N

600 N

500 N

400 N

300 N

200 N

1 00 N

1 00 S

200 S

300 S

400 S

'l 500 S- m? ol- m i'^ ""i-^ m

- o

LEGEND

Resistivity zone boundary

JOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATESJOHN THOMPSON PROPERTY - OPAP 1995

MORRISETE TWP..ONT _______________N.T.S. 32 D/4——^^—^^———

COMPILATION MAP

COMPILED BY JVX LTD.

100 100 200 300

METRESPLOTTED BY

A.S. NOV. 1995

SCALE 1:5000 PLATE 3

NJ

(O

O

"A":

Mor

rise

te

Twp.

LINE

NUM

BER:

40

0 W

EST

25.0

M

ETRE

S N

^l T

O 6

SCIN

TREX

IPR

-11

RECE

IVER

TX

PU

LSE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

POLE

-DIP

OLE

ARR

AY

RECE

IVE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

TRAV

. DI

RECT

ION:

SO

UTH

CI P

OSIT

ION.

TR

AILI

NGSC

ALE

1: 25

00SU

CE 8

(M

7)ue

asro

m /i

ooA

WN

J

.S

b

*

•S

M

b

? \i

John

Tho

mps

on

"A":

Mor

rise

te T

1 m.

LINE

NUM

BER:

tt

Prop

erty

"

26.0

M

ETRE

SV

EST

N-l

TO

6SC

INTR

EX I

PR-1

1 RE

CEIV

ER

TX P

ULSE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

POLE

-DIP

OLE

ARR

AY

R1CE

IVE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

TRAV

. DI

RECT

ION:

SO

UTH

C] P

OSIT

ION:

TR

AILI

NGSC

ALE

1: 25

00SU

CE 8

(M

7)

ui *

u (o

-

* o^

bi v/

i*

RESB

TiV

/l 0

0

S

ut i

N

i*

lin !zao

i z

164

30

RE

CE

IVE

D

:-:- R

?. n 19

9

-.IIN

iWy

LAND

S BR

ANC

H

2 5"

John

Tho

mps

on P

rope

rty

Mor

rise

te T

wp.

LINE

NUM

BER:

10

00

WES

T"A

": 25

.0

MET

RES

N~l

TO

6SC

INTR

EX P

R-1

1 RE

CEIV

ER

TX P

ULS

E TI

ME:

2.

0 SE

CPO

LE-D

IPO

LE A

RRAY

RE

CEIV

E TI

ME:

2.

0 SE

CTR

AV.

DIRE

CTIO

N:

SOUT

H CI

POS

ITIO

N:

TRAI

LING

SCAL

E 1:

2500

SUCe

8

(M7)

91

yi

*

u

M

RESI

STIV

ITY

/IOO

\

N t

- - r

-U

O

U

l M

g Ut s ui S Ul a VI B l

iom

pson

Pro

pert

y"

'A":

Mor

rise

te T

wp.

LINE

NUM

BER:

13

00

WES

T 25

liD

MET

RES

N^l

TO

6Sa

NTR

EX P

;PO

LE-D

ITR

AV.

DIRE

CT

SUCE

8

(M7)

ic

a

V V

"io

o*

-11

RKCE

IVER

OL

E ARRAY

ON:

SOUTH

SCAL

E l

TX P

ULSE

TIM

E:

12.0

SEC

RECE

IVE

TIM

E1

2.0

SEC

CI

POSI

TION

: TR

AILI

NG

2500

RESI

STIV

ITY

/100

91

Ul

A

IX

to

r-

4X *1

i VP,-I

Î

No

UP

t s\

l g

Joh

n.

TH

om

pso

n

Pro

pert

yM

orri

sete

LINE

NUM

BER

"A":

25.0

M

ETRE

SSC

INTR

EX P

R- 1

1 RE

CEIV

ERPO

LE-D

IPO

LE A

RRAY

TRAV

. DI

RECT

ION:

SO

UTH

SCAL

E 1.

IP CO

LE-C

OLE

'M*

(MV/

V)

O*

Ul

*

U

fO

-*

91

, J

VI

f

O

V

MV

,^

w w

H^^^ J

QQ

f\ ^

*

7*

J — u*

-. b

-* ?

^ ?

^ ?

-

! 5 -

? ! i

~g

Vg "

/g -

P Q

O t

-^ ^

V?

"s M i

-X

X

- 0

- b

^\^

v^

ô

B ~

S —

——

.T9 ~

^^N

W.

j}/

p^v

^^S

vi

*X

"

1\

* f

ft .

Oi\

V

O

]

S)

M\

i*™"

^ o

^Bu

^ /^

^^

en \j

w b

JA

C* 7

x "

S '

B ^

a vi

- - "g r i 5 8

z i 5

S o

3J g 8

S3 b

ut C

z i 8

z S 2

z g 8

a e

z vi

^8

3z 1 i i z g z g z 3 U

tZ

Twp.

400

WES

TN

:"l

TO

8

TX P

ULSE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

RECE

IVE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

CI

POSI

TION

: TR

AILI

NG25

00IP

TAU

(SEC

)

88

8 8

8 8

88

28

22

22

22.

S b

b -

3

22.

28

8

2 8

8 2

g

8 2

28

82

B828

2 8

2 8

38

b

- - "ft i i t z | 5 z g S! t* Z i z S z i a* vf Z g z I g 0 z g z g z . z

John

Tho

mps

on P

rope

rty

Mor

rise

te T

wp.

LINE

NUM

BER:

70

0 W

EST

"A":

25.0

M

ETRE

S N

-l T

O 8

SCIN

TREX

PR

- 11

RECE

IVER

TX

PUL

SE T

IME:

2.

0 SE

CPO

LE-D

IPO

LE A

RRAY

RE

CEIV

E TI

ME:

2.

0 SE

CTR

AV.

DIRE

CTIO

N:

SOUT

H C

I PO

SITI

ON:

TRAI

LING

SCAL

E 1:

2500

IP C

OLE-

COLE

"M

1 (M

V/V)

IP

TAU

(SE

C)

9t

l*

*

U*

fO

-*

9*

Ul

A

W

JO

-*

g iS

.

nU

l

- - - ~* - - -

z en

-

u NJ b

-

^ ' C-

-it

v^? s; g

"fi

(M

01

Vfi

~*

2

g Ul i CM

"™

a M g (/l S in Ul 2 VI g t/} g V) g V) a Ul g (/i K I/I 8 vi a V) g in S in i w g a z 8 z K

^z g a z g z 1 g

2z 2 z

j, "

2

S zo

u o

z . 8

2IJ

.

iV

I 0

0

1*

K

—

-Z

8g

,. I/I (/l

U t/t g VI K (/l t/l 2 Ul 8 g Ul g in a in g VI G in 8 in a in g W B in i i g a z 8 z G z g Ul

Z S z 1 g I 2 z S z lg z u VI

Ut z 1

z z

John

Tho

mps

on

"A":

Mor

rise

te '

LINE

NUM

BER:

26

.0

MET

RES

SCIN

TREX

IPR

-11

RECE

IVER

POLE

-DIP

OLE

ARR

AY

TRAV

. DI

RECT

ION:

SO

UTH

SCAL

E 1:

IP C

OLE-

COLE

'M

' (U

V/V

) p) 91

Prop

erty

•wp.

000

WES

TN

~l T

O 6

X PU

LSE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

ECET

VE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

l PO

SITI

ON:

TRAI

LING

26

00TA

U (S

EC)

John

Tho

mps

on P

rope

rty

Mor

rise

te T

wp.

LINE

NUM

BER:

13

00

WES

T "A

": 25

.0

MET

RES

N~l

TO

6SC

INTR

EX P

R- 1

1 RE

CEIV

ER

TX P

ULSE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

POLE

-DIP

OLE

ARR

AY

RECE

IVE

TIM

E:

2.0

SEC

TRAV

. DI

RECT

ION:

SO

UTH

CI P

OSIT

ION:

TR

AILI

NG

SCAL

E 1:

2500

IP C

OLE-

COLE

'M'

(UV/

V)

IP T

AU (

SEC)

91 u

* o*

ro -*

9* m

.* tj

*j -*

- -

a

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

9t VI

OD

- -

\

- - - - -

ft

ft

S^**

J? ^~

r f*

-( ~

*-/. -a

-. M g M S in s

a

a in S 2 2 B i a i z K z g z a z z 1

JX^"

^ o

l i z a N

Z

V

1 \- 0

1 1 i g 2

8.

z 2

2S

22

z o

g 622.

z 2

2

a 8

2.

b

i 2

a Ul g M B Ul 8 en S! g M g i g z g 8 z z g z a z 1 1 1 2 l 1 1 u a i i i z 1 s 1 s

S 2

Documents

JOHN P. THOMPSON AND ASSOCIATES