Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED


Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Overview Briefing

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Overview Briefing



• Purpose• Overview

• Mission Statement• Capability Discussion• Background• Program Summary

• Program Execution• Concept of Operations Summary• Program Schedule• Strategy Objectives• Cost, Schedule, Performance• Industry Concepts

• International• Overview• Approach• Partnerships / Collaboration • Participation Schedule

• Summary

AgendaAgenda

2



• To provide a program overview of the US Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program

~3~

PurposePurpose

~3~


UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED ~4~

OverviewOverview

~4~



Joint Light Tactical Vehicles Joint Light Tactical Vehicles

MISSION:Jointly develop, produce, field and sustain

safe, reliable, suitable and effective family of Joint Light Tactical Vehicles

VISION:JLTV – Providing our Joint Warfighter

with the very best in light tactical vehicle payload, protection and performance

~5~Product Manager JLV~ 28 Apr 2009 ~5~



Capability DiscussionCapability Discussion

• Current fleet mix:

• Protection: fixed protection in light vehicles• Require inherent and supplemental armor, scalable to mission

• Payload: supplemental armor reduces useable payload • Require a design that supports armor, warriors, mission equip, C4, cargo

• Performance: supplemental armor degrades all elements • Require a design that supports mobility, reliability & maintainability at gross vehicle weight & transport at

essential combat configuration

• Transportability: current platforms lack armor design flexibility to allow full range of transportability

• Require a design which enables Rotary and Fixed Wing Air, Sea, Overland transport

Capability gaps within existing fleet are the result of an imbalance in protection, payload, and performance within a

transportable vehicle

PE

RFO

RM

AN

CE P

RO

TEC

TION

PAYLOAD

MUST BEBALANCED

FOR MISSIONREQUIREMENTS

Transportability

The JLTV vehicles built will address this imbalance & meet DoD goals for costs & long-term sustainability

~6~~6~



Who’s Who in JLTVWho’s Who in JLTV

Requirements Development• CASCOM / MCCDC• CDD Development & Staffing for Approval

Program Governance• OSD / ARMY / NAVY• Program Certification & Milestone Decisions

Material Development• PEO CS & CSS / PM JCSS / PM JLTV• Program Management• Milestone Documentation Development

Science & Technology• TARDEC / ONR• Technology Development• Trade Studies to Support Requirements Development

International Participants• Countries: Australia, Israel & Canada

• PA: Australia • Pending PA / Technical Discussions: Israel• Data Exchange Agreements: Canada & UK

Industry• BAE Systems – Ground Systems• Lockheed Martin Owego• General Tactical Vehicles

~7~~7~



Program Tenets Program Tenets

• JLTV FoV emphasizes:• Adaptability• Interoperability• Enhances expeditionary responsiveness to the Joint Warfighter• Increase maneuver capability• Provides outstanding scalable protection at a much lower weight• Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF): Helo &Sealift transportable• Achieves unprecedented levels of commonality• Almost no service unique requirements

Program Tenets = Lower Life-Cycle Costs

~8~



(Concept)

Payload: 3,500 lbs Payload: 4000/ 4500 lbs Payload: 5,100 lbs

(Concept) (Concept)

1 of multiple sub-configurations shown 1 of multiple sub-configurations shown

http://contracting.tacom.army.mil/majorsys/jltv/jltv.htm

Payload Categories Payload Categories

Solutions in Payload Categories A, B & C

~9~



Commonality within FoV w/ Trailers

Commonality within FoV w/ Trailers

JLTV to be designed for commonality beyond major components, to include repair parts, tools, training, system design, maintenance procedures and

sources of supply

JLTV Cat B, IC.

~10~



Payload: 5,100 lbsPerformance: Exceed HMMWVTransport: 1x EAT* CH 47/53

1x IAT** C130

Payload: 3,500Performance: Exceed HMMWVTransport: 1x EAT* CH 47/53

2x IAT** C130Sub-Configurations Sub-Configurations Sub-Configurations

* EAT: External Air Transport ** IAT: Internal Air Transport

ONR & TARDEC Concept Examples

PAYLOAD CATEGORY A PAYLOAD CATEGORY B PAYLOAD CATEGORY C

General Purpose Mobility (4 Seat) - Army/USMC

Infantry Carrier, Fire Team (6 Seat)-Army/USMC

Ambulance (3 Seat+2 Litters) Army/USMC

Utility (2 Seat) – USMC

ITAS (TOW) Carrier (4 Seat) Army/USMC

Heavy Guns Carrier (MP, Patrol, Escort) (4 Seat+ Gunner)-Army/USMC

C2OTM (4 Seat) – Army/USMC

Shelter Carrier / Utility /Prime Mover (2 Seat) - Army/USMC

TARDEC Concept Example ONR & TARDEC

Concept Examples

Payload: 4000/ 4500 lbsPerformance: Exceed HMMWVTransport: 1x EAT* CH 47/53

1x IAT** C130

Trailers for each payload category to have equivalent payload and mobility to support prime movers.

Program focus during Technology Development Phase is on these key configurations build key vehicles, 1 A, 2 B, 1 C

Reconnaissance (6 Seat) - Army Ambulance (3 seat + 4 Litter) - Army/USMC

Balanced Solution Balanced Solution

~11~



Life-Cycle Acquisition Approach

Life-Cycle Acquisition Approach

• Tech Development Phase• Full and open competition for 3 Cost Type contracts• Prototypes from each Payload Category (including Trailers)• Designs for the entire FoV• Developmental Test, limited Operational Test, Limited Live Fire & RAM miles• Potential Off-Ramp to MS C for select sub-configurations

• Engineering, Manufacturing & Development Phase (Notional)• Full and open competition to award 2 contracts• TDP Data rights addressed in RFP• TRL 6 or higher required in RFP• Cost or Fixed Price type contracts

• Production Phase (Notional)• Restricted competition (SDD Contractors only), down select to one contractor• Focused incentives (Reliability Growth, Maintenance Man-hour Reduction, Fuel Efficiency, Life

Cycle O&S Reduction, Accelerated Deliveries)• RFP to include requirement for TDP (Re-competition, Spares, Engineering Efforts, Etc.)

• TDP CLIN executed post Production Verification Test• Fixed Priced type contract for LRIP and FRP

~12~~12~



JLTV DRAFT CDD 2.7a: Content & Structure• Purpose: Display the content & logical alignment of JLTV capabilities by KPP within the requirements hierarchy

• Requirement Summary: JLTV Requirements Hierarchy - FoV KPPs: 7 - FoV KSAs: 3

- FoV Tier 2: 34 - FoV Tier 3: 30 - FoV Tier 4: 36 - MRV Tier 3-4: 25 - FoV Other System Attributes (Para 15): 5

• The hierarchy displays the requirement title, requirement ID, and a generic description.

Tier 1: JLTV KPPs (Red)

JLTV KSAs (Red)

Tier 2: Critical Attributes

(Capabilities) Which Underpin the JLTV KPPs (Blue)

Tier 3: Key Capabilities

Supporting a Critical

Operational Issue (Green)

Tier 4: Remaining Required

Capabilities (Yellow)

RequirementsRequirements


UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 3 Oct 08Product Manager JLTV~ New Zealand Brief ~14~

KPP Measure

6.1.1 Mobility

(T) The JLTV FoV (at GVW) shall achieve the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Reference Mobility Model (NRMM) Trafficability Prediction Summary per the table below. Trafficability varies between MRVs, as identified in separate annexes. (O) See separate Annexes

6.1.2 Transportability

(T)JLTV FoV shall be transportable worldwide by air and sea modes to support strategic deployment and operational maneuver in accordance with service concepts and programs. Additional MRV-specific items identified in separate annexes.(O) See separate annexes

6.1.3 Net-Ready

(T) JLTV FoV shall achieve interoperability through seamless integration of Joint and Service C4I systems installed or mounted on the vehicle. The system (JLTV with installed/mounted C4I systems) must fully support the execution of critical operational activities identified in the joint and system integrated architectures and the system must satisfy the technical requirements for Net-Centric military operations and include

1) DISR mandated GIG IT standards and profiles identified in the TV-1, 2) DISR mandated GIG KIPs identified in the KIP declaration table, 3) NCOW RM Enterprise Services 4) Information assurance requirements including availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation, and issuance of

an Interim Approval to Operate (IATO) by the Designated Approval Authority (DAA), and 5) Operationally effective information exchanges; and mission critical performance and information assurance attributes, data

correctness, data availability, and consistent data processing specified in the applicable joint and system integrated architecture views.(O) Threshold = Objective

6.1.4 ForceProtection

(T) The JLTV shall have scalable protection with inherent and supplemental armor protection against direct fire and IED threats. See Appendix D (classified) for the Threshold Values. Increment II shall provide Increment I protection while returning 25% increased payload (can be applied to payload increase, curb weight reduction, or increased mobility).

(O) See Appendix D (classified) for Objective Values. Increment II: Threshold = Objective

6.1.5 Survivability

(T) Integrated structure with crush resistant roof to support 150% of GVW.(O) Integrated structure with crush resistant roof to support 200% of GVW.

6.1.6 Payload

(T) JLTV shall provide a mobile, versatile platform capable of effectively transporting essential mission role equipment, weapons and mounts, the vehicle occupants and their associated sustainment loads in accordance with functional concepts as specified in separate annexes.

(O) See separate annexes

6.1.7 Availability

(T) JLTV shall have an operational availability Ao of 95% at service specified field level Maintenance Ratios(O) JLTV should have an operational availability Ao of 98% at service specified field level Maintenance Ratios

JLTV Key Performance Parameters (CDD v2.7a)

JLTV Key Performance Parameters (CDD v2.7a)


UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 3 Oct 08Product Manager JLTV~ New Zealand Brief ~15~

KSA Measure

6.2.1 Ownership Costs

(T) JLTV FOV shall have an Ownership Cost equal to or less than $14.293 B for Increment I quantities defined for the Army and Marine Corps.

(O) JLTV FOV should have an Ownership Cost equal to or less than $12.423 B for Increment I quantities defined for the Army and Marine Corps.

6.2..2 Overall Materiel Reliability

(T) JLTV FoV shall have a Mean Miles Between Operational Mission Failure (MMBOMF) of 6170 for Payload Categories A, C and D / 4500 for Category B. Increment II: 11700 MMBOMF.

(O) JLTV FoV should have a Mean Miles Between Operational Mission Failure (MMBOMF) of 11700 for all categories. Increment II: 15,150 MMBOMF.

6.2.3 Fuel Efficiency

(T) Increment I: JLTV FoV shall achieve 60 ton-miles per gallon. Increment II: 65 ton-miles per gallon; or reduce by 10% the gallons/hour fuel consumption rate at idle speed of predecessor vehicle (HMMWV).

(O) Increment I: JLTV FoV should achieve 65 ton-miles per gallon. Increment II: 72 ton-miles per gallon; or reduce by 25% the gallons/hour fuel consumption rate at idle speed of predecessor vehicle (HMMWV).

JLTV Key System Attribute (CDD v2.7a)

JLTV Key System Attribute (CDD v2.7a)



MRAP – IMG(IMG used as example)

120

99

Max Height forC130 Transport

(102)76

(92 - Combat Ht)

96

90.5

75

153

254220

159

196

130

MRAP Cat 1 / JLTV Cat B / HMMWVDimensions (pictures are approximately to scale)

MRAP Cat 1 / JLTV Cat B / HMMWVDimensions (pictures are approximately to scale)



Program Execution Program Execution

~17~



Adaptable: • Varying levels of protection in response to

mission threat• Expeditionary vehicle family • Over full range of operations / conditions

Protected Mobility: • Exceeds current TWV payload & tactical

mobility• Increase protection (especially EFP & IED)

through scalable armor• Returns payload currently traded for armor

Resilient: • Designed to enter harms way & return forces

safely • Adapts light fleet to the IED / Counter

Insurgency paradigm• Retains Major Combat Operations capability

Increases maneuver capacity: • Provides protected mobility on the modern

battlefield

Network-Ready / Interoperable• Space, weight, power claims for C4I

systems

Sources: JLTV CDD, CONOPS, & OMS/MP

Concept of Operations Summary

Concept of Operations Summary

JLTV to provide scalable C4I and adaptable levels of protected mobility to Fire Teams and Combat Support teams.

Synopsis of the Central Idea

JLTV Tech Demo: CAD models of JLTV FoV

Increased commonality: • JLTV to be designed for commonality

beyond major components, to include repair parts, tools, training, system design, maintenance procedures and sources of supply

~18~



JLTV Program ScheduleJLTV Program Schedule

~19~

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2

TD Ktr Awards CDD JROC RFP

Proposals MS B

EMD KtrAwards

DRR

JROC RFP

Proposals MS C

Prod Award

FRP IOC

Design/Fab Design/Fab LRIP

Coupon Testing Coupon Test Ful l Rate Production

Ballistic Cab Test Bal listic Cab Test

RAM & Performance Test RAM & Performance Test

Production Qualification Testing

Prototype Bal listic Testing System Level Live Fire & AFES Testing FUSL & MOTE*

Test Report Test Report Test Report

Analyses & Reporting

CDD Refinement for EMD

InitialCDD Staffing

FinalCDD Staffing

CDD Approved CPDRefinement

InitialCPD Staffing

FinalCPD Staffing

CPD Approved

SOW & Ktr SRR

IBR

PDR

CDR

TRR

Mid MDA Review

MDA Review

Gov't SRR

SOW/SRR

IBR

PDR

CDR

TRR

Mid MDA Reveiw

PRR

Gov't SRR

OTRR PCA

MDAReview

Joint Program Schedule v1.0 Dated: 3 March 08

Technology Development Phase Production & Deployment PhaseEngineering and Manufacturing Development & Demonstration

*Full-Up System Live Fire Test (FUSL) and Multi Service Operational Test & Evaluation (MOTE)

~19~



TD Exit CriteriaTD Exit Criteria

• Linkage with Evaluation of Alternatives • KTRs are open to design a solution that meets the performance requirements • KTRs will demonstrate potential solutions which will inform and mature CDD

requirements

• Systems Engineering• SEP was approved by DAE• Integrate the Government SEP requirements into a contractor SE Management Plan

which describes how KTRs will execute SE

• Acquisition • Goal of TD is to ensure the best family of demonstrators is mature in terms of

supporting technology readiness and full system integration• Government rights on technical data will be a consideration in the EMD selection

• Performance Goals• Technology Development Phase

• Establish technology maturity of at least TRL 6 prior to MS B• Substantiating the reliability requirements

• Engineering Manufacturing & Development Phase• Demonstrate the CDD KPPs and KSAs• Demonstrating the reliability requirements

~20~~20~

A Robust TD Phase will result in Low Risk EMD Investment for International Participation



Approach to Cost, Schedule & Performance

Approach to Cost, Schedule & Performance

• Cost• Each contractor will receive their allocated contract award • No other funding will be allocated• Cost performance will be monitored by CDRL submittals

• Schedule• Each contractor will be required to submit an Integrated Master Schedule

(IMS)• No additional time will be allowed to successfully complete the contract

requirements• Schedule performance will be monitored by CDRL submittals

• Performance • Compliance matrices, trade studies, TPMs, testing and analyses will be

used to assess the capabilities of the proposed system solution• An integrated teaming approach will be used to achieve best possible

system solution• Knowledge Point reviews (government only) will be used to holistically to

assess requirements achievability for SDD

DCMA will assist the PM in monitoring contractor performance and advising on its ability to meet contractual cost,

schedule and performance objectives.

~21~~21~



BAE Systems/ Navistar, as of 29 Oct 08

General Tactical Vehicles, as of 29 Oct 08

Lockheed Martin , as of 29 Oct 08

JLTV Industry ConceptsJLTV Industry Concepts

~22~



Lockheed – JLTV ConceptLockheed – JLTV Concept

~23~



GTV – JLTV ConceptGTV – JLTV Concept

~24~



BAE – JLTV ConceptBAE – JLTV Concept

~25~



InternationalInternational

~26~



International OverviewInternational Overview• JLTV JPO is working with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Defense

Exports and Cooperation (DASA DE&C).

• International participation in the JLTV program will reduce overall program risk through the testing and evaluation of additional prototype vehicle.

• JLTV initiated partnerships with Australia, the United Kingdom, Israel, and Canada, and has provided information to other NATO partners.

• JLTV JPO determined that the best approach to meet the need for international cooperation, support the OSD’s competitive prototyping policy, and reduce program risk, was to have foreign participants contribute to the TD phase and, by combining resources, increase the number of prototypes fabricated.

• The JLTV program office, in coordination with DASA-DE&C, is developing an international strategy for future program phases and will invite nations to identify their interest for joining the JLTV program in the near future.

~27~~27~



International ApproachInternational Approach

• TD Phase• Objective: DAE compliance and risk reduction• Bi-lateral country agreements• Minimal requirements divergence • Integrated system

• CPP• Additional test assets

• EMD Phase• Objectives:

• Reduce cost, schedule, technical risk • Potential to leverage international expertise• Strengthen production potential• Posture JLTV as best value international LTV solution

• Bilateral or multilateral agreements• Minimal requirements divergence• Integrated system

• Fully integrated office staff (CPP, LNO, or TPO)• Additional test assets

~28~



• Australian Project Arrangement• Signed 21 Jan 2009• Funds 9 prototypes and companion trailers• Funds design and development of steering mechanism (RH and LH) and

weapons mount• Places 4 Australian Cooperative Project Personnel at the JPO• Maximum influence prior to PDR• Reliability and performance testing• Equitable contributions

• Israel• Participation under Technical Working Group

• United Kingdom• Participation under Technical Working Group

• Canada• Participation under a Technical Working Group

TD International ParticipantsTD International Participants

~29~



Timeline for Intl’ Participation in EMD

Timeline for Intl’ Participation in EMD

2008 2009 2010 2011

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012

Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

TD Award

PostProtest ATP

SOWM/SRR

IBR PDR CDR TRRCDDJROC

RFP

Proposals

Milestone B

Mid MDA Review MDA

PMR PMR PMR PMR PMR PMR PMR

Coupon Testing

Ballistics Cab Test

RAM and Performance Testing

Prototype Ballistic Testing

Test Report

KP1 KP2 KP3 KP4 KP5 KP6 KP7

CDD Refinement Initial CDD Final CDD

CDD Approved

TD Program Schedule v1.0 Dated: 3 March 09

COD

International Agreement(s)

Technical Discussions -----------------------------------------------------------

International documentation development

--------------------------------------------------INTL Conf

Intent declared

Evaluations

------

~30~



• Multiple contracts awarded on 29 Oct 2008 – Lockheed Martin, BAE, GTV

• Start of Work Meetings (SOWMs) completed Mar 09 for all OEMs

• Integrated Baseline Reviews (IBRs) will be conducted in Apr / May 09

• Currently design and build of prototype vehicles is ongoing and on schedule; program is on track to complete a robust TD phase

• International opportunity for participation in the JLTV EMD phase forthcoming

SummarySummary

~31~

Documents

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle