Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
JournalofTeacherActionResearch1
JournalofTeacherActionResearch-Volume6,Issue1,2019,practicalteacherresearch.com,ISSN#2332-2233
©JTAR.AllRightsReserved
JTAR EDITORS
JTAR JournalofTeacherActionResearchVolume6,Issue1,2019
ExaminingtheInstructionalDesignofInteractiveandCollaborativeLearning 4OpportunitiesRachelKarchmer-KleinElizabethSoslauJannSuttonComparingCooperativeLearningStrategiesinAssessmentInstruction 21JosephA.MayoDoesMindfulnessStrengthenSelf-efficacyinFirstGradeStudents? 32KristenL.LoganErikK.Laursen“Letthepeoplesing!”-ActionResearchExploringTeachers’MusicalConfidence 44WhenEngagingLearnersin‘SingingWellbeing’DaphneRicksonJoAtkinsonDianneReynoldsRobertLeggUsingFirstAuthor©WritingCurriculumwithStudentswithAutismSpectrum 63DisorderKristieAsaro-SaddlerJessicaColes
JTAR AbouttheJournal
Foundedin2013,theJournalofTeacherActionResearch(ISSN:2332-2233)isapeer-reviewedonlinejournalindexedwithEBSCOthatseekspracticalresearchthatcanbeimplementedinPre-Kindergarten
throughPost-Secondaryclassrooms.Theprimaryfunctionofthisjournalistoprovideclassroomteachersandresearchersameansforsharingclassroompractices.
Thejournalacceptsarticlesforpeer-reviewthatdescribeclassroompracticewhichpositivelyimpactsstudentlearning.Wedefineteacheractionresearchasteachers(atalllevels)studyingtheirpracticeand/ortheirstudents'learninginamethodicalwayinordertoinformclassroompractice.Articlessubmittedtothejournalshoulddemonstrateanactionresearchfocuswithintenttoimprovethe
author’spractice.
EditorialTeam
Co-EditorsGilbertNaizer,Ph.D. AprilSanders,Ph.D.
TexasA&MUniversity-Commerce SpringHillCollege
AssociateEditorsLauraIsbell,Ph.D. TamiMorton,Ph.D. SusanWilliams
TexasA&MUniversity-Commerce TexasA&MUniversity-CommerceTexasA&MUniversity-Commerce
ProductionEditorandWebmaster
ChaseYoung,Ph.D.SamHoustonStateUniversity
www.practicalteacherresearch.com
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 4
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
EXAMININGTHEINSTRUCTIONALDESIGNOFINTERACTIVEANDCOLLABORATIVELEARNINGOPPORTUNITIESRachelKarchmer-Klein
UniversityofDelaware
ElizabethSoslau
UniversityofDelaware
JannSutton
UniversityofNorthFlorida
AbstractAs interest in fully online programs increases at institutions of higher education, faculty members must adapt their pedagogical practices to successfully integrate the digital tools available for teaching and learning. This action research study examined if and how faculty in a school of education designed instruction that leveraged digital tools to provide collaborative and interactive learning opportunities in an online program in teacher leadership. Framed by tenets of a sociocultural perspective and the technological affordances of multimodality, collaboration, and interactivity, a variety of data was qualitatively analyzed. Findings revealed interactivity was established when instructional design explicitly guided students to interact with others. Interactivity was also established when students were given opportunities to apply content learned in class, analyze their actions, and report on the experiences to others using multiple modes accessible through digital tools. Related to collaboration, analysis indicated that program design encumbered the implementation of collaborative activities due to large class enrollment and the short duration of the academic semester. These findings will inform future revisions to the program under study as well as be shared with other faculty who are charged with designing online courses but may not have online pedagogical expertise.
Keywords:teacheractionresearch,technologicalaffordance,instructionaldesign,highereducation,onlinelearning
Introduction
Asinterestinfullyonlineprogramsincreasesatinstitutionsofhighereducation,facultymustadapttheirpedagogicalpracticestosuccessfullyintegratethedigitaltoolsavailableforteachingandlearning(AdamsBeckeretal.,2017).Simplyconnectingstudentstoinstructorsandclassmatesusingtechnologydoesnotresultinthoughtfulcollaborationand
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 5
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
interactivity,indicatorsofeffectiveonlineteachingpractices(Beach&O’Brien,2015).Instead,focusshouldbeplacedonhowinstructionisdesignedtocreatethesemeaningfullearningopportunitiesthatmeetcourseobjectives(Karchmer-Klein,Mouza,Shinas,&Park,2017).
Mostonlinecoursesinhighereducationaredeliveredthroughalearningmanagementsystem(LMS),apassword-protectedcloud-basedarchitecturethatprovidesacommononlinelocationtoexchangeinformationforteachingandlearning(Kroner,2014).EachLMS(e.g.,Canvas,Blackboard)encompassesasetofmultimodaldigitaltoolswithuniquetechnologicalaffordances.Forinstance,manyincorporateapeerreviewtoolthatfacilitatesinteractivitybetweenclassmatesthroughwrittenlanguage,images,audioandvideo.Thetoolcanbeeasilyintegratedintoanonlinecourse,butthewayinwhichthelearningopportunityisdesignedwillultimatelyinfluencethedepthandbreadthofstudentlearning,notthetechnologyitself.
Instructionaldesigntypicallyrestsoncourseinstructorswhoareexpertsintheirfieldsofstudy,butmaynotbeexpertpedagoguesofteachingandlearning(Ko&Rossen,2017).This,inturn,mayleadtoanoverrelianceonteacher-directedlearningactivities(Koedinger,Booth,&Klahr,2013;Rientieset.al.,2012).Forinstance,whenstudyingpatternsintheinstructionaldesignof157onlinelearningmodules,ToetenelandRienties(2016)founddidacticteachingmethods,whereinformationwastransferredelectronicallyfrominstructortostudent,werethemostcommonlyintegrated.
Asteachereducatorswhoresearchandimplementtraditionalanddigitalpedagogicalapproaches,wesetouttoexaminetheinstructionaldesignofcoursesinourown100%onlineteacherleadershipgraduateprogram.Thisactionresearchprojectwasimportanttoconductbecausethelessonslearnedcouldbeusedtoinformnotonlyourownpractice,butotherfacultywhoarechargedwithdesigningonlinecoursesbutmaynothaveonlinepedagogicalexpertise.Toachievethisaim,weexploredthefollowingresearchquestion:Inwhatwaysdidonlinefaculty’sinstructionaldecision-makingsupport,ornotsupport,collaborationandinteractivityamongstonlinecourseparticipants?
TheoreticalFramework
Thisstudydrawsupontenetsofasocioculturalperspective,specificallysocialconstructivism(Vygotsky,1978)andsituatedlearningtheory(SL)(Brown,Collins,&Duguid,1989).Socialconstructivismsuggestslearnersdevelopthroughtheirinteractionswithotherpeople’svalues,beliefs,andwaysofthinking(Tracey&Morrow,2017).SLsuggestslearningdevelopsinauthenticcontextswiththeapplicationofcontenttoreallifeexperiences(Herrington&Oliver,2000).Theselensesareespeciallyusefulwhendirectlyappliedtopromotecollaborativelearningopportunitiesamongststudentsincourseworkthatdoesnotincludefacetofaceinstruction.Inthisway,instructorsdeliberatelyandpurposefullydesigninstructionthatrequiresgroupproblem-solvingandengagementindiscussionsaboutrelatableexperiencethatwouldotherwisebeunachievablethroughautodidacticlearningorothernon-peercollaborativeapproaches(Oztok,2016;Vygotsky,1978).
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 6
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
LiteratureReview
EachLMSencompassesasetofmultimodaldigitaltoolswithuniquetechnologicalaffordances(Beach,Anson,Breuch,&Reynolds,2014).Threeofthemostcommonlyidentifiedintheresearchliteraturearemultimodality,interactivity,andcollaboration(Karchmer-Kleinetal.,2017;Beach&O’Brien,2015).Whenfacultybetterunderstandtheseaffordances,theyarebetterequippedtoleveragetheminwaysthatcreatecontextswherecollaborativeandinteractivelearningopportunitiesflourish.
Multimodality.Modesaresignsorsymbolsthatcommunicatemeaning(Kalantzis,Cope&Cloonan,2010).LMSsincorporateseveraltypesoftoolsthatallowfortheconsumptionandproductionofmultimodalmaterials.Canvas,forinstance,allowsteachersandstudentstoembedvideo,audio,staticimages,andhyperlinks.Combiningmodes(e.g.,wordsandaudio)inonlineactivities,suchasdiscussionposts,transformsthelearningenvironmentbyinterjectingnon-verbalcuesinwaysthatallowparticipantstoexperienceeachotherashumansratherthancomputer-generatedwordsonascreen(Lee,2004).Researchexamininginstructormultimodalfeedbackindicatesvalueinitsuse.Forinstance,studentsreportedlyfindaudioandvideocommentsmorepersonal(Henderson&Phillips,2015)andeasiertocomprehend(West&Turner,2016)thanwrittenfeedback.Moreover,thereisevidencethatstudentswhoreceive,process,andinterpretcontentpresentedthroughmultiplemodesscorehigheronassessmentmeasuresthanthosewholearnfromasinglemode(Frisby,Limperos,Record,Downs&Kercsmar,2013).
Interactivity.Interactivityisabouttheexchangeofideasandperspectiveswithothers.Inaneducationalsetting,interactivitycantakeplacebetweenstudents,studentsandinstructors,aswellasstudentsandcontent(Moore,2013).ResearchershavestudiedtheinteractivityaffordedthroughLMSdigitaltoolssuchasonlinediscussionboards(Kent,Laso&Rafaeli,2016),peerreview(Sullivan&Watson,2015),andvideoconferencing(Martin&Parker,2014).Ineachcase,findingsemphasizethecriticalroleofthoughtfulinstructionaldesign.Martin,WangandSadaf(2018),forexample,examinedgraduatestudents’perceptionsofhowtheyuseddigitaltoolstointeractwithinstructors.Althoughpreviousstudiesindicatedthatsynchronousaudioandvisualchatscouldfacilitatecommunitybuilding,(Reushle&Loch,2008),participantsinthisworkdidnotperceivethemashelpful.Instead,studentsreportedthesessions’purposeswerenotwell-articulatednordidtheymeettheirlearningneeds.Thus,althoughtheLMSconferencetoolaffordedopportunitiesforinteractivity,thedesignofthestudent-instructoractivityfellshort.
Collaboration.Collaborationistheprocessbywhichmembersofagroupnegotiate,share,andconstructmeaninginresponsetostimuli.Theincreasedvisibilityofone’sownworkandtheopportunitiestoexpresscreativitythroughcollaborativeonlineactivitieshavebeenfoundtomotivateandusefullyengagestudents(Trentin,2009).Inastudyofgraduateeducationaltechnologymajors,Karpova,CorreiaandBaran(2009)foundthatstudentsweremotivatedtolearnnewtechnologiestocollaboratewhenotheronlinecommunicationeffortsfailed.Studentsquicklydeterminedthatthelackofnon-verbalcuesinasynchronouswrittencollaborativedigitalsettingswasproblematic.Toalleviatetheissue,studentsinitiatedtheuseoftheLMS’svideofunctiontotheycouldtalkasagroupinreal-time.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 7
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Likeinteractivity,studentsseemtobemoreinvestedwhencollaborativetasksarewelldefinedandscaffoldedtosupporttheirunderstandingofgroupdynamics.Kear,Woodthorpe,RobertsonandHutchison(2010)foundthiswhenstudyingtheuseofwikisinanonlinecourseinhighereducation.SimilartoGoogleDocs,wikisarecollaborativedigitalwritingspaceswherestudentsmustdivideresponsibilitiesassociatedwiththeassignedtasksandhowtorespectfullyrespondandreviseclassmates’workgiventheopennatureofthewritingprocess.Kearetal.,(2010)foundthatthelackofpreparednessonhowtouseawikiinfluencedthequalityofstudentworkandstudentsfelthighriskabouttheirengagementintheactivity.
Takentogether,theseaffordancescanbeusedtobuildsociallearningenvironments.Whenaffordancesareleveragedsuccessfully,bothaforementionedtheoreticalframesaresatisfied.Thatis,socialconstructivismcanbeseenintheinstructors’creationofacollaborativeonlinelearningenvironmentthatenableuserstomakemeaninginwaysthatwouldnothavebeenpossiblehadtheynotengagedinthesynergisticonlinespace.Instructors’onlinecoursedesignalsoextendsbeyondsocialconstructivismbysituatingthelearningandmeaningmakingprocessinahighlycontextualizedsettingthatmimicsthefuturelivedexperiencesofthelearnersintheirauthenticsettings,thusincorporatingthesignaturecomponentsofsituatedlearningtheory.
Methodology
ResearchContext.TheMasterofEducationinTeacherLeadership(MEdTL)isafullyonlineprogramdesignedforfull-timecertifiedteacherswhoseektofillschoolleadershiprolessuchasinstructionalspecialist,datacoach,andteachermentor.CourseworkisalignedwiththeTeacherLeaderModelStandards(TeacherLeaderExploratoryConsortium,2011)andMiddleStatesCommissiononHigherEducation.
TheMEdTLwaschosenasthefocusforthisactionresearchstudyfortworeasons.First,thefacultywerehighlydedicatedtotheprogram’ssuccessandvaluedtheroleoftechnologyincandidatelearning.Moreover,theywereexpertsinnotonlytheircontentareas,butalsopedagogy,giventheirexperienceandresearchasteachereducators.Second,itwasthefirstfullyonlinegraduateprogramofferedbytheuniversity’sSchoolofEducation.Thisstudywasseenasanopportunitytoidentifystrengthsandweaknessesandmakemodificationsasneeded.
MEdTLcandidatescompleteten,three-creditcoursestaughtasynchronouslyinseven-weeksessionsusingCanvas(LMS).ItwasdecidedbyfacultythatallcourseswouldbeorganizedaroundaSituatedLearning(SL)modelthatdirectlyconnectedcandidates’professionalexperiencestograduatecoursecontent(Clarke&Hollingsworth,2002).Therefore,arequirementofadmissionwascurrentemploymentinaprofessionalsettingallowingcandidatestopracticeleadershipskillslearnedinclass.Individualcourseshadlargeenrollmentsof45-65candidates.
Participants.Datawerecollectedfromfourfull-timefacultywhohelddoctoratedegreesineducation(pseudonymsreplaceparticipants’realnamesinthisarticle).Theparticipants,threefemalesandonemale,allCaucasian,hadanaverageof21yearsoverallteachingexperience,anaverageof14yearsofexperienceashighereducationfaculty,andanaverageofalmost6yearsofonlineteachingexperience.Theirfieldsofexpertiseincluded
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 8
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
pedagogicaldecision-makingacrosscontentareas,literacyeducation,actionresearch,andmobilecomputingenvironments.Thefacultymembersdidnothaveanyformaltrainingtoteachonline,describingthemselvesas“self-taught”andmainlyrelyingontheirpedagogicalexpertisecoupledwithpeersupporttoguidethedevelopmentoftheircourses(seeTable1forparticipantandcourseinformation).
Table1:DemographicInformationasReportedbyFaculty
GenderFacultyMember
(Pseudonym)HighestDegree
YearsofTeachingExperience
YearsTeachingOnline
Male Dr.Bower Ph.D. 29 4
Female Dr.Kostner Ph.D. 23 13
Female Dr.Merrin Ed.D. 20 5
Female Dr.Santos Ph.D. 13 1
Positionality.RachelandElizabeth,twoofthethreeauthorsofthismanuscript,werealsofacultyinstructorsintheprogram.Jann,thethirdauthor,wasadoctoralcandidate.Mirroringtheworkofactionresearchers(Herr&Anderson,2005),self-studyadvocates(Tidwell,etal.,2009),andadoptingateacherasinquirystance(Feiman-Nemser,2012)enabledustoexamineourownpracticethroughtheexternalizationandjointexaminationofourdesignexperiences.
Tosecurecredibilityandconfirmability(Herr&Anderson,2005)andtomakeuseofour‘collaborativeresources’(Melrose,2001),JannwassolelyresponsibleforthefirstwaveofdataanalysisandRachelandElizabethinitiallytookontheroleofinformant(Eisner,1998).Additionalvaliditycriteriasuchastransferabilityandecologicalvaliditywerestrengthenedbyclearlysituatingthisstudyinthecontextfromwhichthedatawereculled;therebyallowingresearchconsumersfromhighereducation,andonlinecourseinstructors,todrawparallelstotheirowncontexts(Guba&Lincoln,1981;Bloomberg&Volpe,2008).
DataSourcesandAnalysis
LMSDigitalTools.Beforeexploringthefaculty’sdecision-makingaroundtheavailableonlinelearningtools(i.e.,Pages,Discussions,PeerReview,Collaborations),thetoolsthemselveswereanalyzedagainstaffordances(multimodal,interactivity,andcollaboration)followinganinductiveanddeductiveprocess(Patton,2015).Wereaddescriptionsofthetools’capabilitiesontheCanvaswebsiteandconductedindependentreviewsbyutilizingtheminwayswewerefamiliarwithinourownwork.Next,wemetandreferredtoournotestoidentifyspecificinstancesofif/howthetoolsincludedtheaforementioned
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 9
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
affordances.Oncewereachedagreementaboutthedigitaltools’affordances,weillustratedtheanalysis(seeTable2).
Table2:LMSToolsandAffordancesLeveragedbyInstructors
Tool TypesofActivitiesWritten
Language
OralLanguage
Visual
Audio
Interactivity
Collaboration
Pages ProvidecontentthroughCanvasorotherapplications. X X X X
Discussions Providespacetotalkwithclassmatesandinstructor X X X X X X
PeerReview Provideopportunitytopeerreviewwork X X X X X
Collaborations Providespacetocollaborateonthesamedocument X X X X X
Modules.Tolimitthepooltoamanageablecorpusofcodabledata,participantswereaskedtoidentifyonemodulefromeachclasstheydesignedwhichwasmostrepresentativeoftheirentirecourseintermsoftechnologicaltoolsusedandattentiontooverallcourselearninggoals.Atotalofeightcoursemoduleswereidentified.Thenumberofactivitieswithinamodulerangedfromeighttoseventeen.
Tobeginanalysis,tableswereconstructedusingthefollowingheadings:(a)learningobjective,(b)activity,(c)digitaltool,and(d)technologicalaffordances.Thefirstthree
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 10
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
columnswereimmediatelyfilledforeachmodule.Second,weworkedindividuallyandthencollaborativelytoconductdeductiveanalysisofthemodulesusingthetechnologicalaffordances(multimodality,interactivityandcollaboration)asaprioricodes.Thisprocessconsistedoflookingacrossthelearningobjectives,activities’descriptions,andtheselecteddigitaltoolsandcross-codingandaxial-codingagainsttheaffordances(Patton,2015).Thirdly,wesystematicallyexaminedtheactivitiestoidentifysimilaritiesanddifferencesamongandbetweenthemtoidentifypatternsrelatedtoifandhowtheactivitiesprovidedopportunitiestocollaborateandinteract.Table3isanexampleofacodedsetofactivitieswithinonemodule.
Table3:ExampleofCodingActivitiesWithinaModule
LearningObjective Activity CanvasDigitalTool
LeveragedAffordance
Tounderstandanddemonstrateknowledgeof
differentcoachingmodels.
Readarticlesandwatchvideoonpeercoaching. Pages Multimodality
Readarticlesandwatchvideooncontent-specific
coaching.Pages Multimodality
Readarticlesandwatchvideoonmentoring. Pages Multimodality
Readarticlesandwatch
videooncognitivecoaching.
Pages Multimodality
Watchvideoanddeterminecoachingtype
implemented.Postresponseindiscussionboardwithevidence
supportingyouranswers.Respondtoatleastoneclassmate’spostwith
questions,affirmations,orhealthydebate.
Discussions MultimodalityInteractivity
Interviews.Jannconductedsemi-structuredinterviewswitheachfacultyparticipantwiththepurposeoflearningmoreabouttheinstructors’decision-making,perceptionsofonlineteaching,andtheirassessmentoftheoverallmoduledesignincludinghowtheLMStoolswereusedtofacilitatestudentlearning.Interviewsweretranscribedverbatim,copiedinto
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 11
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
NVivosoftware,andanalyzedusinganaprioricodingsystemalignedtothetechnologicalaffordancesofmultimodality,interactivityandcollaboration.
OverallAnalysis.Onceeachdatasetwasanalyzed,usingtheconstantcomparisonmethod,wecross-comparedtheconsistencyoffindings(Patton,2015).Forexample,wecomparedandcontrastedhowparticipantsdescribedtheirmoduledesignwiththeanalysisofhowweidentifiedthetechnologicalaffordanceswereleveragedwithinthemoduleactivities.Nexttofurtherexamineourfindings,Jannconductedmember-checkingwithparticipants(Lincoln&Guba,1985).Shedraftedafullreportoutliningthemesalongwithdataexamplesandsharedthedocumentwiththefaculty.Toreacha75%member-checkrate,Jannmetwiththreeofthefourparticipantsfor90-minutestodiscussreactionstothereport,clarificationofpoints,andtheopportunitytoanswerquestions.Overall,resultsfromthemembercheckservedtoconfirmtheoriginalanalysis.
Results
RequirementsScaffoldedInteractivity.AnexaminationofcandidateworkwithinCanvasindicatedtwoimportantfindingsrelatedtointeractionsamongandbetweencandidatesandinstructors.First,allinteractions,suchascandidates’discussionboardpostsandclassmates’responseswerepresentedusingwrittenlanguageunlessthedirectionsspecificallyrequiredtheuseofadifferentmode.Inotherwords,candidateschosetorespondtoclassactivitiesusingtypedwordsratherthanaudioorvideo.ThisfindingwasnoteworthybecausetheCanvastoolsencompassedmultimodalaffordancesallowingcandidatestoseamlesslyrespondwithachoiceofmodes.Moreover,themajorityofinstructorfeedbacktocandidateswasprovidedwithtypedwrittenlanguagealthough,again,theCanvasgradingfeatureallowedforvideooraudioresponses.Dr.Kostnerwastheonlyinstructorwhodesignedinstructionthatencouraged,andsometimesrequired,candidatestorespondwithaudioorvideo.Herinterestandexperiencewithdigitaltoolsseemedtoinfluenceherinstructionaldesign.Sheexplainedinherinterview,“Ilikeusingdifferentdigitaltoolsandchallengingcandidatestopresenttheirthinkinginvariousways,especiallysincemanycandidatescommunicateviatextandreadfromwebpagesratherthantraditionallyprintedbooks.”
Analysisalsorevealedinteractivitymostlytookplacebetweencandidatesonlywhenitwasrequired.Forexample,instructorsdesignedtwotypesofactivitiesthatutilizedtheCanvasDiscussionstool.Reflectivepostswerewrittenbycandidatesinresponsetoteacher-createdpromptsafterreading,viewing,andparticipatingincoursecontentandactivities.Althoughtheinstructorcouldprovidecommentsandclassmateswereencouragedtorespond,therewasnoexpectationthesewouldoccur.Wedidnotfindanyinstancesofcandidatesrespondingtoreflectivepostsinthemodulesexaminedforthisstudy.
Discussionposts,ontheotherhand,werelikereflectivepostsbutrequiredcandidatestorespondtoatleastoneclassmate.Inotherwords,thereweregradesattached.Inallinstancesthatweexaminedforthisstudy,candidatesrespondedtoatleastoneclassmate’spostandfulfilledthisrequirement.Althoughthedepthandbreatheoftheinteractivityseemedtobedependentuponhowtheinstructordesignedtheactivity.Forexample,Table
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 12
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
4includesexcerptsfromgradingrubricsusedtoassesscandidates’responsestoclassmates’discussionboardpostsinthreedifferentclasses:
Table4:ExampleofGradingRubricsforDiscussionPosts
Course Criteria NoCredit HalfCredit FullCredit
#1 Responsetoclassmate
Doesnotrespondtoclassmate
Responseto1classmate
Responsetoatleast2
classmates
#2 ResponsivenessDoesnot
interactwithclassmates
Responserefersto2otherclassmates’opinions
Responsereferstoother
classmates’opinionsaswellasreadings
#3
Responseexplicitly
respondstogroupmemberposts,and
substantivelybuildsonthembyfurthering
theirargument,constructivelyofferingadifferent
perspective,orposing
questionslikelytofurtherpeers'thinkingabout
theissue.
Responsefulfillsalldimensionsofcriteria
ResponsedoesnotrespondtogrouppostsOR
doesnotsubstantivelybuildonthem
Responseexplicitly
respondstogroupmemberposts,and
substantivelybuildsonthembyfurthering
theirargument,constructivelyofferingadifferent
perspective,orposing
questionslikelytofurtherpeers'thinkingabout
theissue.
Thereareobviousdifferencesbetweentherubrics.Rubrics#1and#2mentiontheexactnumberofresponsesthatneedtobepostedtoreceivecreditwhereasRubric#3isvague.Rubric#3providesmoredetailedcriteria,explicitlystatingthetypesoffeedbacktheinstructorwouldtoevaluatetheresponse.Analyzingcandidateworkwasoutsideofthescopeofthispapersowedonotshareactualpostsinthispaper.However,theanalysisoftherubricsandotheraspectsoftheinstructionaldesignindicatethatcandidatesfollowedthedirectionspresentedtothemwheninteractingwithclassmatesintheseonlinecourses.
SituatedLearningScaffoldedInteractivity.Dr.Merrindescribedtheapplicationofcontenttorealworldexamplesas“somethingtakenveryseriouslyintheprogram”andshedescribedassignmentsas“notabstractbutreallytangiblethingsthatarerelevantto
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 13
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
[candidates’]dailyjobsandresponsibilities.”AnalysisrevealedthatinstructiondesignedaroundsuchSLopportunitiesscaffoldedinteractivityintheMEdTLcourses.
OnetypeofSLdesignrequiredcandidatestoconnecttheirprofessionalexperiencestocoursereadingsandvideosbyrespondingtoteacher-createdprompts.Closeanalysisrevealedthemajorityofpromptsdidnotmerelyrequirecandidatestodescribetheirprofessionalsettingsinrelationtothetopic,butratherextendtheirthinkingtoconsiderchallenges,alternativeapproaches,orotherperspectives.Forexample,afterwatchingvideosandreadingarticlesonethicalactionresearchaswellasconductingacritiqueofanactionresearcharticle,candidateswereaskedtorespondtothefollowingprompt:“Whatinnovationshaveyouimplementedthatdonotseemtobeworkinginthewaysthatyouhadanticipated?”Anotherexampleisfromacourseonstatecurriculumstandardswherecandidateslearnedhowupdatedstandardsrequiredshiftsinteachingandlearning.Thepromptwas:
Describethekindsofchangesthatyouhavealreadymadeinyourschoolorclassroom--orthatyoufeelyoumustmake--inordertomeetthedemandsofthestatestandards.Clearlyidentifythechangesthatyoumadeorwillhavetomake,whyyoumadethem(orhavetomakethem),andwhetherornotyouoryourcolleaguesarehavingdifficulties/discussions/argumentsaboutthesechanges,andthenatureofthosediscussions.
Again,thispromptwentbeyondsummarizingwhatwaslearnedfromclassresourcestorequiringcandidatestomakecomplexconnectionstotheirprofessionalsettingsfromtheroleofteacherleader.
Insomeinstances,theresponsestoteacher-createdpromptswerecompletedinpublicdiscussionboardsaccessibletoclassmates,promotinginteractivityamongthembysparkingdebate,agreement,oradditionalquestions.Inothercases,candidates’responseswerepostedprivatelywithintheCanvasAssignmentstool,whichallowedinteractivitytotakeplacebetweenthecandidateandinstructor.
AnothertypeofSLdesignthatprecipitatedinteractivityinvitedMEdTLcandidates’colleaguesorotherexpertsintotheonlinelearningspaceTheseactivitiesreflectedSLsincetheinformationdrawncamefrompeoplewhosharedsimilarprofessionalsettings.Forexample,inacourseontechnology-basedcollaborationsMEdTLcandidatescreatedaProfessionalLearningNetworkfocusedonaproblemofpractice(PoP)identifiedintheirschool.Candidateswererequiredtosurveycolleaguesandreportbacktheirfindings,explaininghowtheynarroweddowntheirPoPandhowitwasapplicable.ThisactivityprecipitatedinteractivitybetweenMEdTLcandidatesandtheircolleagues.
AthirdwayinteractivitywasscaffoldedbySLwaswhentheinstructionaldesignleveragedmultimodality,specificallyvideoandaudio.Forinstance,acoachingcourserequiredcandidatestovideotapethemselvesleadingaprofessionaldevelopmentconversationwithacolleague.CandidatesuploadedthevideosdirectlyintothePeerReviewtoolinCanvaswhereclassmatesanalyzedtheconversationsandprovidedverbalfeedbackusingtheaudiofeatureastheyevaluatedthevideo.Usingvideoallowedtheinstructorandclassmatestomaketheirownassessmentsofcontentapplicationratherthanrelyingsolelyonthe
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 14
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
candidates’accountsofwhattookplace.Dr.Kostnerexplained,“Videoisapowerfultoolespeciallywhenwe’reaskingcandidatestodescribetheirownpractice.Ithelpsthemlookattheirworkmoreobjectivelyanditalsohelpstheirclassmatesdothesame.”
ParticipantsagreedthatframingactivitiesfromaSLlensbenefittedlearninginatleasttwoways.First,SLprovidedinstructorswithwindowsintocandidates’professionalcontexts.Inturn,instructorsfelttheyhadmoreinsightsaboutchallengescandidatesconfrontedwhenattemptingtoimplementcontentfromthecourseworkandtheycouldprovideindividualizedfeedback.Second,instructorsfeltsharingreal-lifeexperiencesscaffoldedgroupcohesion,creatingsocialsettingswherecandidatescouldmakesenseofthestoriesclassmatestoldabouttheirexperiencesrelatedtocoursecontent.Dr.BowerexplainedthathepurposelybuiltSLactivitiesintohiscoursessothatcandidateslearnedmoreabouteachother.Hestatedthisapproachledto“morerobustinteractions”inclass.
ProgramDesignInfluencedCollaboration.Inthisstudy,collaborationwascodedwhenanactivityrequiredagroupofcandidatestoanalyzeandapplycontenttodevelopasynthesizedoutcomerepresentingtheircombinedefforts.Usingthisdefinition,collaborationwasevidentinonlyonemoduleoutoftheeightanalyzed.Acourseonequityissuesrequiredcandidatestobrainstormresponsestoacasestudyandcreateaplanofactionbasedontheircollectivethinking.Specifically,theinstructionsguidedcandidatestouseacollaborativewritingtool,suchasGoogleDocs,orvideoconferencingtool,suchasCanvasCollaborations,toworktogetherto“buildconsensusabouttheidealresponsethatrepresentsthegroup’sthinking.”
Givenonlyonemoduleoutofeightreflectedcollaboration,MEdTLinstructorswereaskedabouttheirviewsofonlinecollaborationduringtheirinterviewsandthemember-checkingmeeting.Therewasagreementbytheparticipantsthatcandidateswouldbenefitfromworkingtogetheronclassprojects,especiallysincethecandidatedemographicsreflectedarangeofbackgroundexperiencesandprofessionalsettings.Dr.Merrinnoted,“Mostofmyfacetofaceclasstimeiscollaborative.Candidatesturnandtalkallthetime,sharingideasandbuildingconsensus.”However,instructorsidentifiedtwochallengestoleveragingthecollaborativeaffordanceswithinthedigitalenvironment.
AsthefirstfullyonlineprogramintheSchoolofEducationthatservedasthesettingforthisstudy,theadministrationdeterminedcourseenrollmentswouldnotbelimitedinorderforittobefinanciallyviable.Thus,45-65candidateswereregisteredineachcourse.Toputthisinperspective,face-to-facegraduatecoursesatthisinstitutionweretypicallycappedat20candidates.Althoughtheyweredeeplyinvestedintheprogram,facultyvoicedconcernovermanaginglargenumbersofcandidates,especiallyinanonlineenvironmentwheretheyneededtorelyondigitaltoolstoscaffoldthecollaboration.
Thesecondchallengewastheshortdurationoftheonlinesemester.Eachthree-creditcourseranforsevenweeksyetcoveredthesameamountofcontentasintheregular14-weeksemester.Facultyfounditdifficulttointroducecandidatestocontent,providesituatedlearningactivities,assessunderstanding,andprovideopportunitiestocollaboratewithinsuchacondensedamountoftime.AsDr.Santosexplained,“Thereisalotofbackandforthbetweeninstructorandcandidate[inmyclass].SowithlargeenrollmentsI’mgoingtohave60somethingcandidatesthatIamgoingtohavetohelpwiththeirworkand
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 15
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
it’saseven-weeksemester.Ijustdon’tknowhowtodoit.”Insum,althoughCanvastoolsallowedforcollaborationtotakeplace,participantsreportedlychosenottoleveragethisaffordanceduetoprogramdesign.
Discussion
A Inthisstudywedidnotevaluatetheeffectivenessofthelearningactivitiesnorcandidates’engagementinthecourse,thereforewedonotpresumeanimpactonstudentlearning.Instead,wefocusonthreeinsightsthatcaninformrevisionstoourinstructionaldesign.
Findingsindicatedthewaylearningopportunitiesweredesignedinfluencedcandidates’useofmultimodality.Thiswasevidentinthatthemajorityofcandidateresponsesandclassinteractionswerecomposedwithwrittenlanguage,unlessdirectionsspecificallyrequiredtheuseofadifferentmode.Sincewedidnotinterviewcandidateswecannotsayforcertainwhytheyreliedmostlyontypedwords.Perhapstheywereunsure,unaware,ordisinterestedinrepresentingtheirknowledgewithmodesotherthanwords.Similarly,whenfacultyrequiredinteractivity,suchasrespondingtoclassmates’postsonthediscussionboards,candidatesengagedintheseactivities.Yet,whentheywerenotrequiredbutgivenspacetointeract,fewcandidatesdid.Overall,thesefindingstaughtusthatfacultymustcloselyexaminetheaffordancesofthedigitaltoolstheyintegrateintotheirinstruction,decideiftherearemodesorinteractionscandidateswouldbenefitfrom,andtheninvitecandidatestorepresenttheirknowledgeindifferentways.Activitiesshouldthenbestructuredaroundtheintegrationofthesedecisionswithclearandexplicitinstructions.Byrestructuringactivitiesintheseways,lessondesigncantransitiononlinecoursesfromisolatedspacestosocial,interactivelearningcommunities(Lee,2004).Additionally,instructorsshouldmodelhowtoleveragemultimodality,collaborationandinteractivitywithintheLMS.Thiswouldprovidecandidateswithconcreteexamplesfromwhichtheycouldlearn.Ofcourse,thisrequiresfacultytoinvestinprofessionaldevelopmentopportunitiesthatexplicatehowonlineteachingdiffersfromtraditionalfacetofacepedagogy.
FindingsalsoindicatedSLprecipitatedinteractivityinonlinecoursesbyprovidingconcretestartingpointsfordiscussions.SLencouragedcandidatestosharetheirindividualprofessionalstoriesandactivelyconnectthesestoriestocoursecontent.Interestingly,instructorsalsoleveragedmultimodalitytoinviteothersintothelearningexperiencethroughvideoandaudiorepresentations.ThisfindingtaughtusthatframingcoursesaroundSLwasagooddecision,butthatthetoolsforcollaborationarenotyetbeingoptimizedbycandidatesorinstructors,particularlyastheypertaintocommunicationfordiscussionusingmodesotherthantypedwords.
Accordingtofaculty,programlogisticsalsoseemedtoinfluenceinstructionaldesign.Facultyvoicedconcernswithintegratingcollaborativeprojectsduetoclasssizeandtheshortdurationofthesemester.Theseobstaclesreflectedtherealitiesofteachingonlineatthisuniversity.Theyalsohighlightedatensionbetweenresearch-basedteachingpracticesanduniversity-mandatedpolicies.Forexample,althoughtheyunderstoodtheimportanceofcollaboration,thefacultymostlyshiedawayfromgradedgroupactivitiesbecausethemanagementwastoocumbersome,especiallywhenclassenrollmentexceeded50
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 16
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
candidates.Thistensionisnotuniquetothisparticularsetting.Universitiesaroundtheworldareprioritizingstudent-centered,hands-onlearningopportunitiesoverrotememorization,yetnotprovidingfacultywiththeprofessionaldevelopmentorsupporttore-envisionclassroompractices(AdamsBeckeretal.,2017).Althoughthereisnoconsensusabouthowmanystudentsareoptimalinanonlinecourse,researchindicates“14%morehoursarerequiredtoteachthesamenumberofstudentsonlineatadistancethaninthetraditionalclassroom”(Tomei,2006,539).Asadministratorsmakeenrollmentdecisionsbasedonfinancialneeds,itiscriticaltoconsiderwhatcompromisesmustbemadetosustainthelevelofstudentenrollment.
Inlightofthesefindings,wesharepreliminarystepsweplantotaketoimproveourinstructionaldesign.First,weplantolobbyouradministrationforsmallclasssizes,whichwouldmakegradingcollaborativeprojectslessunwieldly.Second,weplantoencourageourcandidatestoleveragemultimodalityaffordedbythetechnology.Finally,wewillconductacoursemappingexerciseacrossallsevenmodulesfromalltencourses,wherewecollaborativelyidentifythefeaturesofourcourseassignmentsthatareaimedatpromotingcollaborationandconnectionstohighlycontextualizedlived-experiences.
LimitationsandFurtherResearch
Thisworkshouldbeviewedinrelationtothreelimitations.First,aprimarysourceofdatawascontentfromeightdifferentcoursemodules,onlyasubsetofinstructionalcontentwithineachcourse.Inturn,theremayhavebeencollaborativeand/orinteractiveopportunitiesthatwerenotexamined.Additionally,thismethodremovedtheactivitiesfromthecontextoftheentirecourse.Itwouldbeusefultoconductasystematicstudyofanentirecoursetoevaluatethefullgamutofactivities.Second,sincewefocusedonlearningopportunitiesandnotlearningoutcomesinthisspecificinquiry,candidatedatawerenotcollected.Priorresearchindicatesthatmuchcanbelearnedfromstudentperspectivesatanygradelevel(e.g.,Coiro&Dobler,2007;Jimenez&Meyer,2016).Suchanapproachinfuturestudieswouldinfusetheirimportantvoices.Third,weexaminedcoursesdesignedbyexpertsinthefieldofeducationforaparticulareducationprogram.Moreover,threeoutoffourparticipantshadexperiencedesigningfullyonlinecourses.Thus,theresultswilllikelydifferwhenexploringonlinelearningenvironmentsdesignedbyfacultywithexpertiseoutsidethefieldofeducationorwithlesstechnologyexperience.Conclusion
Accordingtothe2017NMCHorizonReportHigherEdEdition,“Technologyanddigitaltoolshavebecomeubiquitous,buttheycanbeineffectiveordangerouswhentheyarenotintegratedintothelearningprocessinmeaningfulways”(AdamsBeckeretal.,2017,p.7).Designingonlineinstruction,however,isacomplexanddemandingtaskthatwillnotoccurwithoutsystematicexplicitinstructioninthepedagogiesassociatedwithdigitalteaching.Wesuggesthighereducationfacultyengageinsimilartypesofprogramreviewasdescribedinthispaperandalsobegivenopportunitiestostrengthentheirunderstandingsofonlineinstructionaldesign.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 17
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
AbouttheAuthors
RachelKarchmer-Klein,Ph.D.isanAssociateProfessorattheUniversityofDelawarewheresheteachesundergraduate,graduate,anddoctorallevelcoursesinliteracyandeducationaltechnology.HerresearchagendafocusesontherelationshipsbetweenInternettechnologiesandreadingandwriting,withparticularemphasisonthepracticalimplicationsoftechnologyuseinK-16education.Shetaughtherfirstonlinecoursein2003andnowcoordinatesandteachesintwofullyonlinegraduateprogramsineducation.Dr.Karchmer-Klein’sworkhasbeenpublishedinjournalssuchasReadingResearchQuarterly,ActioninTeacherEducation,JournalofDigitalLearninginTeacherEducation,andJournalofResearchonTechnologyinEducation.Email:[email protected]
ElizabethSoslau,Ph.D.isanAssociateProfessorintheSchoolofEducationattheUniversityofDelaware. Herresearchfocusesonthedevelopmentofadaptiveteachingexpertise,buildingintersubjectivitybetweenteachereducatorsandstudentteachers,andpromotingteachers’agencyandequityliteracy.Dr.Soslau’sworkhasbeenpublishedinjournalssuchastheJournalofTeacherEducation,TeachingandTeacherEducation, ActioninTeacherEducation,andEducationalActionResearch.Herclinicalworkincludescoordinatingthestudentteachingpracticum,providingfieldinstructioninurbanschools,andteachinggraduateandundergraduatecoursesindiversityandequity,aswellasactionresearchmethodsforteachers.AsapastmiddleschoolteacherwiththePhiladelphiaSchoolDistrict,sheremainscommittedtoinitiativesthatsupportuniversityandpubliceducationpartnerships.Email:[email protected]
JannMarieSutton,Ed.D.isaninstructionaldesignerwiththeCenterforInstructionandResearchTechnologyattheUniversityofNorthFloridawhereshecollaborateswithfacultytoidentifyandapplyrigorouspedagogicalconceptsandprinciplestoteachinginitiatives.ProjecthighlightsincludecultivatingpedagogicalstrategiesintheUnitedStates,SouthAfrica,Haiti,andBosniaandHerzegovina.Herresearchinterestsencompassexamininginstructionaldesignstrategies,investigatingonlineteachingactivitiesforlargeonlineclassesandgroupwork,andevaluatingdigitaltools.Dr.Sutton’sworkhasbeenpublishedintheJournalofManagementEducationandtheJournalofOnlineLearningandTeaching.Email:[email protected]
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 18
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ReferencesAdamsBecker,S.,Cummins,M.,Davis,A.,Freeman,A.,GlesingerHall,C.&Ananthanarayanan,V. (2017).NMCHorizonReport:2017HigherEducationEdition.Austin,Texas:TheNewMedia Consortium.Retrieved March6,2018fromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/p/174879/.Karchmer-Klein,R.,Mouza,C.,Shinas,V.,&Park,S.(2017).Patternsinteachers’instructionaldesign whenintegratingappsinmiddleschoolcontentareateaching.JournalofDigitalLearningin TeacherEducation,33(3),91-102.Beach,R.,C.M.Anson,L.A.K.Breuch,andT.Reynolds,T.2014.Understandingandcreatingdigital texts:Anactivity-basedapproach.Lanham,MD:Rowman&Littlefield.Beach,R.,&O'Brien,D.(2015).Fosteringstudents’scienceinquirythroughappaffordancesof multimodality,collaboration,interactivity,andconnectivity.Reading&WritingQuarterly, 31(2),119-134.doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.962200.Bloomberg,L.,&Volpe,M.(2008).Completingyourqualitativedissertation:Aroadmapfrom beginningtoend.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.Brown,J.S.,Collins,A.&Duguid,D.(1989).Situatedlearningandthecultureoflearning. EducationalResearcher,18(1),32-42.Castek,J.,Beach,R.,Cotanch,H.,&Scott,J.(2014).Examiningmiddle-schoolstudents’usesofDiigo annotationstoengageincollaborativeargumentativewriting.InR.Anderson&C.Mims (Eds.),HandbookofresearchondigitaltoolsforwritinginstructioninK-12settings(pp.80– 101).Hershey,PA:IGIGlobal.Clarke,D.,&Hollingsworth,H.(2002).Elaboratingamodelofteacherprofessionalgrowth.Teaching andTeacherEducation,18(8),947-967.Coiro,J.,&Dobler,E.(2007).Exploringtheonlinereadingcomprehensionstrategiesusedbysixth- gradeskilledreaderstosearchforandlocateinformationontheInternet.ReadingResearch Quarterly,42(2),214-257.Eisner,E.(1998).Theenlightenedeye:Qualitativeinquiryandtheenhancementofeducational practice.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:Merrill,PrenticeHall.Feiman-Nemser,S.(2012).Teachersaslearners.Cambridge,MA:HarvardEducationPress.Frisby,B.,Limperos,A.M.,Record,R.A.,Downs,E.,&Kercsmar,S.C.(2013).Students'perceptions ofsocialpresence:rhetoricalandrelationalgoalsacrossthreemediatedinstructional designs.JournalofOnlineTeachingandLearning,9,468-480.Guba,E.,&Lincoln,Y.(1981).Effectiveevaluation:Improvingtheusefulnessofevaluationresults throughresponsiveandnaturalisticapproaches.SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.Henderson,M.&Phillips,M.(2015).Video-basedfeedbackonstudentassessment:Scarily personal.AustralasianJournalofEducationalTechnology,31(1),51-66.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 19
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Herr,K.,andG.L.Anderson.(2005).TheActionResearchDissertation:AGuideforStudentsand Faculty.ThousandOaks,CA:Springer.Herrington,J.,&Oliver,R.(2000).Aninstructionaldesignframeworkforauthenticlearning Environments.”EducationalTechnologyResearchandDevelopment,48(3),23-48.Jimenez,L.M.,&Meyer,C.K.(2016).Firstimpressionsmatter:Navigatinggraphicnovelsutilizing linguistic,visual,andspatialresources.JournalofLiteracyResearch,48(4),423-447.Kalantzis,M.,Cope,B.,&Cloonan,A.(2010).AmultiliteraciesperspectiveontheNewLiteracies.In E.A.Baker(Ed.),TheNewLiteracies:MultiplePerspectivesonResearchandPractice(pp.61- 87).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Karpova,E.,Correia,A,&Baran,E.(2009).Learntouseandusetolearn:Technologyinvirtual collaborationexperience.InternetandHigherEducation,12,45-53.Kear,K.,Woodthorpe,J.,Robertson,S.&Hutchison,M.(2010).Fromforumstowikis:Perspectives ontoolsforcollaborations.InternetandHigherEducation,13,218-225.Kent,C.,Laslo,E.,&Rafaeli,S.(2016).Interactivityinonlinediscussionsandlearningoutcomes. Computers&Education,97,116-128.Ko,S.,&Rossen,S.(2017).TeachingOnline:APracticalGuide.NewYork:Routledge.Koedinger,K., Booth,J.L.&Klahr,D.(2013).Instructionalcomplexityandthesciencetoconstrainit. Science,(342)6161,935–937.Kroner,G.(2014)DoesyourLMSdothis?Retrievedfrom:http://edutechnica.com/2014/01/07/a- model-for-lms-evolution/LaPointe,D.K.,Greysen,K.R.B.,&Barrett,K.A.(2004).Speak2Me:UsingsynchronousaudioforESL teachinginTaiwan.TheInternationalReviewofResearchinOpenandDistanceLearning, 5(1).Lee,K.(2004).“Presence,explicated.”CommunicationTheory.14(1):27-50.Martin,F.&Parker,M.A.(2014).Useofsynchronousvirtualclassrooms:Why,Who,andHow? JournalofOnlineLearningandTeaching,10(2),192-210.Martin,F.,Wang,C.&Sadaf,A.(2018).Studentperceptionofhelpfulnessoffacilitationstrategies thatenhanceinstructorpresence,connectedness,engagementandlearningononline courses.InternetandHigherEducation,37,52-65.Melrose,M.(2001).Maximizingtherigorofactionresearch:Whywouldyouwantto?Howcould you?”FieldMethods,13(2),160-180.Moore,M.(Ed).(2013).Handbookofdistanceeducation.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 20
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Oztok,M.(2016).Culturalwaysofconstructingknowledge:theroleofidentifiesinonlinegroup discussions.”InternationalJournalofComputer-SupportedCollaborativeLearning,11(157), 157-186.doi:10.1007/s11412-0169233-7Patton,M.Q.(2015).Qualitativeresearch&evaluationmethods.(4thed).ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.Rienties,B.,Kaper,W.,Struyven,K.,Tempelaar,D.T.,VanGastel,L.,Vrancken,S.etal.(2012).A reviewoftheroleofinformationcommunicationtechnologyandcoursedesignin transitionaleducationpractices.InteractiveLearningEnvironments,20(6),563-581.Reushle,S.&Loch,B.(2008).Conductingatrialofwebconferencingsoftware:Why,Howand PerceptionsformtheCoalface.TurkishOnlineJournalofDistanceEducation9(3),19-28.Sullivan,D.,&Watson,S.(2015).Peerassessmentwithinhybridandonlinecourses:Students’views ofitspotentialandperformance.JournalofEducationalIssues,1(1).RetrievedMarch6, 2018from:https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1131766.pdfTeacherLeaderExploratoryConsortium.(2011).TeacherLeaderModelStandards.RetrievedMarch 4,2018from:http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdfTidwell,D.,Heston,M.,&Fitzgerald.L.(2009).ResearchMethodsfortheSelf-StudyofPractice,Vol. 9.Springer:NewYork.Toetenel,L.&Rienties,B.(2016).Analysing157learningdesignsusinglearninganalyticapproaches asameanstoevaluatetheimpactofpedagogicaldecisionmaking.BritishJournalof EducationalTechnology,47(5),981-992.Tomei,L.A.(2006).Theimpactofonlineteachingonfacultyload:Computingtheidealclasssizefor onlinecourses.JournalofTechnologyandTeacherEducation,14(3),531-541.Tracey,D.H.&Morrow,L.M.(2017).Lensesonreading:Anintroductiontotheoriesandmodels. (3rdedition).NewYork:GuilfordPress.Trentin,G.(2009),Usingawikitoevaluateindividualcontributiontoacollaborativelearningproject. JournalofComputerAssistedLearning,25,43–55.Vygotsky,L.S.(1978).Mindinsociety:Thedevelopmentofhigherpsychologicalprocesses Cambridge,Mass.:HarvardUniversityPress.West,J.&TurnerW.(2016).Enhancingtheassessmentexperience:improvingstudentperceptions, engagementandunderstandingusingonlinevideofeedback.InnovationsinEducationand TeachingInternational,53(4):400-410.doi:10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 21
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
COMPARINGCOOPERATIVELEARNINGSTRATEGIESINASSESSMENTINSTRUCTIONJosephA.Mayo
GordonStateCollege
AbstractAsafollow-uptoapriorexploratoryinvestigationofcooperativelearninginteachingassessmenttoearly-childhood-educationmajors,thepresentstudysystematicallycomparesthepedagogicalefficacyoftwovariantsofcooperativelearning.Inthefirstcooperativelearningcondition,studentsreprisedthesimulatedclassroompracticeevidencedintheCooperativeAssessmentPortfolio(CAP)assignmentusedinthepreviousstudy.Inthesecondcondition,studentscompletedaCooperativeAssessmentCaseAnalysis(CACA)assignmentwithdistinguishingfeaturesofcase-basedlearning.Onallquantitativeandqualitativemeasures,resultsfavoredtheCAPoverCACAassignment.Findingsarediscussedinlightofsocialconstructivistpedagogyandfuturedirectionsforresearch.
Keywords:cooperativelearning,socialconstructivism,constructivistpedagogy,educationalassessment,earlychildhoodeducation,post-secondaryclassroomresearch,actionresearch
Introduction
Recentdecadeshavewitnessedanincreaseinactive-learningpedagogiesincollegeclassrooms(Fink,2004).Cooperativelearningcontinuestoholdaprominentplaceinthischangingclassroomlandscape(e.g.,Davidson&Major,2014;Gillies,2016;Healy,Doran,&McCutcheon,2018;Love,Dietrich,Fitzgerald,&Gordon,2014).Amongthemostresearchedofalltopicsintheteachingliterature,asignificantbodyofevidencesupportscooperativelearningasameansforstudentstooptimizetheirownlearningwhilefacilitatingtheacademicperformanceoftheirclassmates(Johnson,Johnson,&Holubec,2008).Asastructuredapplicationofcollaborativelearning,themeritsofcooperativelearningatthecollegelevelcanbeclassifiedundertwobroadcategories:academicandsocioemotional(Jones&Jones,2008).Morespecifically,cooperativelearningencourageshigher-orderreasoning,goal-setting,idea-generation,group-to-individuallearningtransfer,promotiveinteraction,positiveinterdependence,andinterpersonalcompetence(Johnson,Johnson,&Smith,2014;Mayo,2010;Williams,2007).Cooperativelearning,astheunderlyingpedagogicalbasisforthepresentstudy,haslongstandingtheoreticalrootswithintheconstructivisttradition.SocialinterdependencetheoryderivesfromtheconfluenceofKurtKoffka’s(1935/1999),KurtLewin’s(1935,1948),andMortonDeutsch’s(1949)shared
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 22
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
recognitionofgroupsasdynamicinitiatorsofvaryinglevelsofinterdependenceamongindividualgroupmembers.Vygotsky(1962/1986)builtuponthisperspectivewithhissocioculturaltheoryofdevelopment.AccordingtoVygotsky,thereisinterplaybetweencognitiveprocessesandsocialactivitiessuchthatsocialinteractionbecomesessentialtoactiveknowledgeconstructiononanintrapersonallevel.Inpractice,cooperativelearningbringstogetherthebasicelementsofthesetheoreticalstances.Groupsofstudentsworktogethertolearn,whileeachindividualbecomespersonallyaccountableforhisorherownlearningwithinthegroupcontext(Brame&Biel,2015).
LiteratureReview
BackgroundandPurposeofthePresentStudy.Inapriorexploratoryinvestigation,Iaskedgroupsofstudentstocompleteanend-of-semesterproject,calledtheCooperativeAssessmentPortfolio,injunior-levelassessmentclassesforearly-childhood-education(ECE)majors(Mayo,2013).ThestudyfocusedontheextenttowhichthisassignmentservedasaformativelearningtoolforECEcandidatesinsuccessfullydesigningteacher-developedstrategiesforassessingthelearningofyoungchildren.Students’performanceontheassignmentdemonstratedassessmentproficiencyasappliedtosimulatedclassroompractice.Moreover,students’surveyedperceptionstowardcompletingtheassignmentpointedtoitseffectivenessinbothpromotingmasteryofacademiccontentandfosteringproductivegroupinteraction.TheobservedsuccessoftheCooperativeAssessmentPortfoliointhispilotstudyservedasaspringboardformyundertakingthepresentinvestigation.
Thepurposeofthecurrentstudyistosystematicallycomparethepedagogicalefficacyoftwogroup-basedassignmentsusingcase-basedlearning(CBL):theCooperativeAssessmentPortfolio(CAP)examinedintheaforementionedpreliminaryinvestigationandtheCooperativeAssessmentCaseAnalysis(CACA).CBLtypicallyincorporatescollaborative-learningprocessesthatpermitstudentstosolveproblemsandreflectontheirexperiences(Hmelo-Silver,2004).TheprimarypurposeofCBListoteachstudentstoapplytheoreticalknowledge(Ching,2014).Inthecontextofteachereducation,themannerinwhichCBLaccomplishestheseintersectingeducationalaimscanbesummarizedasfollows:
[CBL]providesgenerativecontextsforprospectiveandcertifiedteacherstoworktogetherinsmallcollaborativegroups.Together,theyanalyzeproblems,discussoptions,andmakeinformeddecisionstosolveproblemsbasedonauthenticteachingsituationswithreal,multifacetedchallenges(DeSimone,2014,p.17).
Withinthegroup-centeredandapplied-theoreticalfocusofCBL,boththeCAPandCACAassignmentsareaimedatpermittingstudentsvariedopportunitiestodemonstrateaworkingunderstandingofthefactorsunderlyingwell-conceivedteacher-developedassessmentstrategies.WiththeCAPassignment,studentsengageinsimulatedclassroompracticebycreatingtheirownclassroomassessments.Incontrast,studentscompletingtheCACAassignmentcritiquealready-createdclassroomassessmentsasanexerciseinprofessionaldecision-making.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 23
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
InspiteofCBL’swidespreaduseinteachereducation,therehasbeenrelativelylittlepublishedresearchonCBL-reliantinstructionalmethodologiesoroutcomesrelateddirectlytoteacherpreparation(Goeke,2008).Thepresentstudyaimstoaddtothisareaofresearch.Italsoseekstomakeanoriginalcontributiontotheteachereducationliteraturethroughsystematiccomparisonoftwocooperative-learningassignmentsintheframeworkofteachingECEassessment.
Methodology
Participants.Participantswere96ECEbaccalaureatecandidatesenrolledinfourequivalent-enrolledsectionsofajunior-levelcourseinECEassessmentforwhichIservedasinstructor.Classes,whichweretaughtatapublicstatecollegeinthesoutheasternUnitedStates,occurredinanacceleratedfour-weeksummersemester(twohoursofinstructionperday,fivedaysaweek).Twoclasssectionswereofferedineachoftwoconsecutivesummerterms.
Theparticipantpoolconsistedof87femalesand9males.Theracialdemographicwasapproximately85%Caucasian,13%African-American,and2%multiracial.Participantsrangedinagefrom21to43years(M=23.98).Roughly60%ofparticipantswerefirst-generationundergraduates,withnearlytwothirdsholdingafull-orpart-timejobwhileenrolledinthecourse.Allparticipantshadcompletedtwosemestersofclassroomfieldexperienceinpre-kindergartenthroughfifthgradebeforetakingthecourse.
Design.Iusedanindependent,two-group,quasi-experimentaldesigninwhichintactclasseswereassignedtooneoftwoconditions.Inoneconditionthattookplaceovertheinitialsummerofthestudy,50studentscompletedtheCAPinfulfillmentoftheirterm-lengthprojectrequirement.Inanothercondition,46studentscompletedtheCACAastheirterm-lengthprojectinthesecondsummeroftheinvestigation.Therewerenoappreciabledifferencesbetweenconditionsonthebasisofage,gender,orGPA.Additionally,Iheldcoursecontent,testingformat,andotherrelevantinstructionalvariablesconstantbetweenconditions.
CourseDescription.Thelearningobjectivesofthecoursewerebroadlyinclusiveasrelatestoearly-childhoodassessmenttopics;however,theprincipalfocusofthepresentstudywasstudents’understandinganddevelopmentofappropriatestrategiesforassessingthelearningofyoungchildrenfrompre-kindergartenthroughgradefive.Thisprimaryfocus—whichwascanvassedinboththeCAPandCACAassignments—includeddecidingaccuratelywhattoassessandhowtoassessit,withemphasisonthecognitivedomainoftherevisedversionofBloom’staxonomyofeducationalobjectives(Krathwohl,2002).Italsoencompassedthedetectionandpreventionofbiaswhenassessingchildrenwithspecialneedsandchildrenfromculturallyandlinguisticallydifferentbackgrounds.
Iadministeredaunitexamatmidtermineachofthetwoconditions.Thisexamcontained50conceptuallyappliedmultiple-choicequestionsfromthenon-principalfocalareasofthecourse,includingtheoriesembeddedinassessmentpractices,testvalidityandreliability,interpretingstandardizedtests,andapplyingpropertest-preparationpracticestowardhigh-
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 24
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
stakesstandardizedtesting.Attheconclusionofthesemester,Iadministeredasecondunitexamtostudentsineachconditionthatservedasthecurrentinvestigation’sdependentmeasureforcomparativestatisticaltesting.Thissecondexamalsoconsistedof50conceptuallyappliedmultiple-choicequestions,butthesequestionspertainedtothechieffocalpointsofthestudythatwereaddressedinboththeCAPandCACAassignments.Inordertominimizethepossibilityofexperimentereffectsincomposingthesecondexam,Iselectedallmultiple-choicequestionsfromconceptuallybasedtest-bankitems.Consistentwithconsiderationssurroundingbothtestsecurityandalternate-formreliability,Imatchedquestionsonbothcontentandlevelofdifficultyintheprocessofselectingitemsforinclusiononfourdifferent-but-comparableexamversions(oneforeachofthefourparticipatingclasssections).
InstructionalProcedures(CAPCondition).IntheCAPcondition,theinitialthreeweeksofthesemesterconsistedofin-depthclassroominstructionovertheentiregamutofassessmenttopics(bothprincipalandnon-principalfocalpointsasdescribedunderCourseDescription).Throughoutthefinalweekofthesemester,studentsworkedinclasswithinpre-assignedgroupsoffourorfiveindividualstocompletetheCAPassignmentwithslightproceduralmodificationsfromthepreviouspreliminaryinvestigation(Mayo,2013).Thesemodifications,whichincludedeliminatingaffectiveassessmentandplacinggreateremphasisonabsence-of-biasinassessment,werepredicatedlargelyoninstructivestudentfeedbackfrompriorsummativecourseevaluations.Onceassignedtotheircorrespondinggroups,studentsmetpreliminarilytoselectindividualstoserveintheflexibleandrotatingcapacitiesoffacilitator,recorder,andotherdefinedroles.
IncompletingtheCAPassignment,eachgroupselectedthegradelevel(s),subjectarea(s),andspecifictopic(s)toincorporateintotheportfolio.Eachgroupalsoestablishedacollaborativedivisionoflaborinwhicheachmemberwasexposedtoarepresentativesamplingofeveryassessmentstrategyoutlinedbelow:
1. selected-responseassessment[20binary-choice(true-false)items;10multiplebinary-choiceitemsintwosetsof5;20multiple-choiceitems;and10matchingquestionsintwosetsof5]
2. constructed-responseassessment(20short-answeritemsandtwodifferentessayitemswithanaccompanyinganalyticscoringrubricforeach)
3. performanceassessment(oneconceptmap,case-studyanalysis,analogicalreasoningproject,andautobiographicaland/orbiographicaljournalingassignment,withaconcomitantanalyticscoringrubricforeachassignment)
4. portfolioassessment(fivehypotheticalworksamplesrelatedtotargetedskillsand/orknowledgeforprospectivestudentstomaster,alongwithasingleanalyticrubriconwhichallworksamplescouldbescored)
Studentscomposedanswerkeysforallselected-responseandshort-answerconstructed-responseitems.Forconstructed-responseessays,performanceassessment,andtheportfolio-assessmentitems,studentsdesignedprototypicalresponsesuponwhichtheybasedtheirassociatedscoringrubrics.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 25
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Alongwithdemonstratedmasteryofeachassessmentstrategy,theevaluativecriteriaforscoringeachgroup’sassignmentincludedanappliedunderstandingofBloom’staxonomy(knowledgeandcognitive-processdimensions)andabsence-of-biasinassessmentplusevidenceofacollaborativedivisionoflabor.Iratedstudentsonallevaluativecriteriaexceptforcollaborativedivisionoflabor,whichwasreservedsolelyforstudentsincorrespondinggroupstoevaluate.Onthedivision-of-laborscore,studentsineachgroupratedoneanotherintermsofindividualcontributionstothegroup(e.g.,effort,cooperation,anddedicationtoteamwork),withthegroup’saverageperpersonusedforindividualscoringpurposes.PeerratingsoccurredonaLikertscalerangingfrom1=unsatisfactoryto5=exceptional.Iaffordedadditionalopportunityforstudentstooffertheirevaluativecomments.Ikeptallpeerratingsanonymoustootherstudents.
TheCAPassignmentcountedforonethirdofthefinalcourseaverage.Incalculatingeachstudent’sgradeforthisassignment,Iweightedallofthefollowingeightevaluativecriteriaequallyincalculatingthecumulativegradeforeachstudent:(1)Bloom’sknowledgeandcognitive-processdimensionspercontentstandard;(2)absence-of-biasinassessment;(3)averagewithin-grouppeerratingperrespectivestudent;(4)selected-responseassessment;(5)constructed-responseassessment(shortanswer);(6)constructed-responseassessment(essay);(7)performanceassessment;and(8)portfolioassessment.Inassigninggradesforeachevaluativecriterion,Ireliedonanumerical-ratingsystemwithsimilaranchorsasthestudents’peerratings(1=unsatisfactoryto5=exceptional).Icollapsedallevaluativecriteriaontoagradingsummarysheet,whichalsoincludedspaceforaconcisesynopsisofmyevaluativecommentsandaschemeforconvertingrubricpoint-totalstograde-levelpercentages.Forclarification,Idistributedandreviewedthecontentofthissummarysheetduringthefirstclassmeeting.Oncegradingwascompleted,Ireturnedthesesheetstorespectivestudentsattheendofthesemester.
CACACondition.IntheCACAcondition,thefirstthreeweeksofthesemesterinvolvedthesameclassroominstructionasoccurringintheCAPcondition.SimilartotheCAPcondition,studentsworkedinclassduringthefinalweekofthesemester—inpre-assignedgroupsoffourorfive—tocompletetheCACAassignment.AsintheCAPcondition,studentsintheCACAconditionmetbrieflyaftergroupswereassignedtochooseindividualstoactinvariousflexibleandrotatingroleswithineachgroup.
IntheCACAcondition,Iaskedeachgrouptowritecritiquesofaseriesoffictitiousreferencecasesthatreflectedalloftheteacher-developedassessmentstrategiescanvassedintheCAPassignment:selected-response,constructed-response(shortanswer),constructed-response(essay),performance,andportfolioassessment.IncompletingtheCACAassignment,IalsorequiredstudentstoaddressthesameconsiderationsasthoseobservedintheCAPcondition,includingBloom’sknowledgeandcognitive-processdimensions,absence-of-biasinassessment,andacollaborativedivisionoflaborwithineachgroup.
Idesignedallcasesasnarrativeexperiential-learningexercisesbasedontheprincipalfocalpointsofassessmentcanvassedinthecourse.Casesoriginatedfromtwosources.Thefirstsourceinvolvedmyowninstructor-createdcasesthatincludedvarioustypesoferrorsinassessmentpractice.Thesecondsourcederivedfromappropriatelyreferencedadaptations
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 26
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ofcasescenariosappearingasappliedassessmentexerciseswithinleadingtextbooks,workbooks,andotherpublicationswithintherealmofeducationalassessment.Insomesituations,thesecasesalreadyincorporatedoneormoreerrorsthatstudentscouldidentifyanddiscussintheirCACAassignments.Inotherinstances,assessmentblunderswerenotpresent.Ineitherevent,Imodifiedcasecontent—rangingfrommoderatelyforerror-inclusivecasestoextensivelyforcorrectcaseapplications—suchthaterrorsofomissionand/orcommissionwereintroduced.Asimple,illustrativeexampleofaconstructed-response(shortanswer)itemforsecond-gradersappearsnext.Thislanguage-artsitem—whichincludesinitalicsabriefdiscussionoftheaccompanyingassessmenterror—isadaptedfromextended-applicationsexercisesappearingattheconclusionofPopham’s(2014)classroom-assessmenttextbook:
Theselettersareallvowels:A,E,O,andU.Whatistheonemissingvowel?____________
Althoughtheintendedcorrectansweris“I,”“Y”and“W”areoccasionallyacceptedasvowels.Therefore,thisitemviolatesoneofthebasictenetsofdevelopingsoundshort-answeritems,namely,theintendedcorrectresponsemustbeunique.
Iusedthesamepeer-andinstructor-ratingscalesandproceduresintheCACAconditionthathadbeenusedintheCAPcondition.IincorporatedallevaluativeinformationintothesamegradingsummarysheetthathadbeenutilizedintheCAPcondition.Onceagain,IdistributedandreviewedthisgradingsheetatthestartofthesemesterandthenreturnedittostudentsafterIhadcompletedgradingatthesemester’sconclusion.AswiththeCAPassignment,theCACAassignmentwasalsoworthonethirdofthefinalcourseaverage.
Results
ComparativeStatisticalTesting.Asdescribedinmethodology,thedependentmeasurewasstudents’scoresontheend-of-semesterunitexamthataddressedmaterialrelatedtothemajorcontentconcentrationsinthecourse(teacher-developedassessmentsinconjunctionwithbothBloom’staxonomyofthecognitivedomainandabsenceofbiasinassessment).ThemeansandstandarddeviationsforstudentscoresineachconditionareCACA(M=80.92,SD=10.36)andCAP(M=84.88,SD=8.65).Iusedindependent-groupst-testingtocomparestudentscoresintheCACAconditionwiththoseintheCAPcondition.ResultsshowthatstudentperformanceintheCAPlearningconditiondifferedsignificantlyfromperformanceintheCACAcondition,t(94)=2.04,p<.05.
QuestionnaireData.Igaugedstudents’perceptionsofcompletingcorrespondingassignmentsintheCACAandCAPAconditionswithananonymous10-itemquestionnairethatcombineda5-pointLikertratingscale(notatalleffective=1tohighlyeffective=5)withseveralquestionsaboutrespectiveassignmentstowhichstudentsrespondednarratively.Iaskedstudentstoratenumericallytheexperienceofcompletingtheassignmentinquestionintermsofhoweffectivelyitaccomplishedatotalof10educationalobjectives.Ialsoaskedstudentstocommentnarrativelyonwhattheylikedbestandleastabouttherespectiveassignments,alongwithwhethertheywouldrecommendthatassignmenttootherstudents.Students’numericalratingsareshowninTable1.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 27
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Table1:Students’NumericalRatingsoftheCooperativeAssessmentCaseAnalysis(CACA)andCooperativeAssessmentPortfolio(CAP)Assignments
QuestionnaireItem MSD
CACA(n=46)
MSD
CAP(n=50)
Thinkingbeyondtheclassroom 3.83 .70
4.72 .61
Fosteringparticipationinlearning 3.66 .48
4.58 .42
Increasingpracticalrelevanceofinformation 3.74 .62
4.88 .31
Facilitatingunderstandingofcoursecontent 4.01 .39
4.56 .51
Increasingmotivationtolearn 3.45 .80
4.27 .54
Promotingintellectualchallenge 3.62 .53
4.44 .46
Stimulatinginterestinthesubjectmatter 3.36 .75
4.31 .49
Distinguishingbetweenvariedassessments 3.71 .43
4.67 .63
Recognizingtheimportanceofabsence-of-bias 3.50 .72
4.39 .58
ApplyingBloom’sTaxonomy(cognitivedomain) 3.55 .68
4.78 .42
Questionnaireratingscoincidedwiththeresultsofcomparativestatisticaltesting.StudentspreferredtheCAPtotheCACAassignmentacrossallsurveyedmeasures.Students’narrativecommentswerealsoconsistentwiththeirnumericalratings.Althoughapproximately60%ofrespondentsintheCACAconditioncommentedaboutthecooperativecase-analysisassignment’sgeneralutilityinbolsteringunderstandingofthetargetedcoursecontent,onlyabouthalfthatnumbersaidthattheywouldrecommendittootherstudents.Incontrast,morethan90%ofrespondentsintheCAPconditionassertedthattheywouldrecommendthecooperativeportfolioassignmenttootherstudents.InresponsetowhatstudentslikedbestabouttheCAPassignment,thevastmajoritystatedthatitprovidedvaluablehands-onexperiencethatshouldlaterbenefitthemintheirfutureteachingresponsibilities.Manyof
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 28
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
theserespondentsalsoremarkedthattheyhadneverrealizedhowmuchtimeandenergywentintocreatinggoodteacher-developedassessments.Notunexpectedly,themajorcriticismofbothassignmentswastheperceivedworkloadassociatedwiththeircompletion.StudentsintheCAPconditionvoicedthiscriticismmostoften;however,manyofthesesamerespondentsqualifiedtheirconcernbynotingthattheendproductwasbothpersonallygratifyingandworththeconcertedeffort.
Discussion
Withinthebroadcontextofunderstandingandapplyingvariedtypesofteacher-developedassessments,thepresentresultsshowthattheCACAassignmentdidnotcompareasfavorablyastheCAPcounterpartonthejointmeasuresofcomparativestatisticaltestingandanalysisofsurveyedattitudinaldata.Thecorereasonwhythisoccurredmightrelatetofundamentaldifferencesintheunderlyingfoundationsofthesetwotypesofcooperativelearning.
TheCACAandCAPassignmentsarevariantformsofsocialconstructivistpedagogy(Mayo,2010)thatencouragesmallgroupsofstudentstoworktogethertocreatesharedunderstanding.Inthesetypesofassignments,studentscollaboratetoproduce,notreproduceknowledge(Millis,2002).TheCACAassignmentalignswiththelongstandingtraditionofusingcase-basedlearninginnumerousundergraduatedisciplinesasameansoflinkingknowledgeandpracticethroughdevelopingstudents’criticalthinkingandappliedreasoningskills.(e.g.,Allchin,2013;Floyd&Bodur,2005;Heitzmann,2008;Kaddoura,2011;Mayo,2002,2004;Pariseau&Kezim,2007).BoththeCACAandCAPassignmentsqualifyasproblem-centeredapproachesthatadvocateforauthenticapplicationsofcoursecontentintheframeworkofactiveandinteractivelearning.Yettheseassignmentstakedifferingroutestotheseeducationaloutcomes.Asmentionedbrieflyintheliteraturereview,theCACAassignmentusescasestudiestointroducepracticalexamplesandanalogouscontextsforanalysis,critique,andvicariouslearningandpracticeinprofessionaldecision-making.Ontheotherhand,theCAPassignmentreliesonactualsimulatedclassroompracticethatoffersstudentsampleopportunitiestocreatetheirownassessmentstodemonstrateappliedunderstandingofsoundprinciplesoftestconstruction.Ofthetwoapproaches,then,theCAPismoreinherentlyactiveinpractice.Thisconclusionisnotonlysupportedbyrelatedpedagogicalfindingsinotheracademicdisciplines(e.g.,Jeffries,2005),butitalsoupheldinthepresentstudybystudents’perceptionsoftheCAPassignmentasfosteringdemonstrablygreaterparticipationinlearningthantheCACAassignment(seeTable1).
Conclusion
Overall,theresultsofthepresentstudyvalidatethemeritsofcooperativelearninginECEassessmentinstructionthatemphasizessimulatedclassroompracticeasavehicleforpromotingwhatHmeloandGuzdial(1996)describedmorethantwodecadesagoasknowledge-building-for-action.Additionalresearch,involvingassignmentssimilarinnaturebutperhapsdifferentinscopetotheterm-lengthCAPassignment,mightshowifthese
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 29
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
findingsalsoapplytoassessmentinstructioninmiddle-gradesorsecondaryeducationprograms.Anotherpotentiallyinvitingdirectionforfutureresearchonpre-servicestudents’assessmentinstructionmightinvolveasystematicexaminationofthepedagogicalefficacyofahybridcooperative-learningapproachthatintegrateskeyelementsofboththeCAPandCACAassignmentsfromthecurrentinvestigation.Asaproposedexample,studentsmightbeginwithcarefullyplannedcaseanalysesasawaytoscaffoldlearningexperiences(seeHmelo&Guzdial,1996)inpreparationforlatersimulatedclassroompractice.
AbouttheAuthor
JosephA.Mayo,Ed.D.iscurrentlyaProfessorofPsychologyatGordonStateCollegeinBarnesville,Georgia,whohasbeenteachingandconductingclassroom-centeredresearchinhighereducationforoverthreedecades.Hisprimaryresearchinterestiseffectiveundergraduateteachingstrategieswithanemphasisonconstructivistclassroomapplications.Heistherecipientofbothstatewideandnationalawardsforhisongoingcontributionstothescholarshipofteachingandlearning.Email:[email protected]
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 30
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ReferencesAllchin,D.(2013).Problem-andcase-basedlearninginscience:Anintroductiontodistinctions,values,and outcomes.TheAmericanSocietyforCellBiology:LifeSciences,12,364-372.Brame,C.J.,&Biel,R.(2015).Settingupandfacilitatinggroupwork:Usingcooperativelearninggroups effectively.Availableat:http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/setting-up-and-facilitating-group- work-using-cooperative-learning-groups-effectively/.Ching,C.P.(2014).Linkingtheorytopractice.Acase-basedapproachinteachereducation.Socialand BehavioralSciences,123,280-288.Davidson,N.,&Major,C.H.(2014).Boundarycrossing:Cooperativelearning,collaborativelearning,and problem-basedlearning.JournalonExcellenceinCollegeTeaching,25,7-55.DeSimone,C.(2014).Problem-basedlearninginteachereducation:Trajectoriesofchange.International JournalofHumanitiesandSocialScience,4,17-29.Deutsch,M.(1949).Atheoryofcooperationandcompetition.HumanRelations,2,129–151.Fink,L.D.(2004).Beyondsmallgroups:Harnessingtheextraordinarypoweroflearning.InL.K.Michaelson,A. B.Knight,&L.D.Fink.Team-basedlearning:Atransformativeuseofsmallgroupsincollegeteaching (pp.3-26).Sterling,VA:StylusPublishing.Floyd,D.M.,&Bodur,Y.(2005).Usingcasestudyanalysisandcasewritingtostructureclinicalexperiencesina teachereducationprogram.TheEducationalForum,70,48-60.Gillies,R.M.(2016).Cooperativelearning:Reviewofresearchandpractice.AustralianJournalofTecher Education,41(3).Availableat:http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3Goeke,J.L.(2008).Apreliminaryinvestigationofprospectiveteachers’reasoningaboutcasestudieswith expertcommentary.TeacherEducationandSpecialEducation:TheJournaloftheTeacherEducation DivisionoftheCouncilforExceptionalChildren,31,21-35.Healy,M.,Doran,J.,&McCutcheon,M.(2018).Cooperativelearningoutcomesfromcumulativeexperiences ofgroupwork:Differencesinstudentperceptions.AccountingEducation,27(3),286-308.Heitzmann,R.(2008).Casestudyinstructioninteachereducation:Opportunitytodevelopstudents’critical thinking,schoolsmartsanddecisionmaking.Education,128,523-541.Hmelo,C.E.,&Guzdial,M.(1996).Ofblackandglassboxes:Scaffoldingforlearninganddoing.InD.C.Edelson &E.A.Domeshek(Eds.),ProceedingsofICLS96,AACE,Charlottesville,VA,pp.128–134.Hmelo-Silver,C.E.(2004).Problem-basedlearning:Whatandhowdostudentslearn?EducationalPsychology Review,16,235-266.Jeffries,P.R.(2005).Aframeworkfordesigning,implementing,andevaluatingsimulationsusedasteaching strategiesinnursing.NursingEducationPerspectives,26,96–103.Johnson,D.W.,Johnson,R.T.,&Holubec,E.J.(2008).Cooperationintheclassroom(8thed.).Edina,MN: InteractionBookCompany.Johnson,D.W.,Johnson,R.T.,andSmith,K.A.(2014).Cooperativelearning:Improvinguniversityinstructionby basingpracticeonvalidatedtheory.JournalonExcellenceinCollegeTeaching,25,85-118.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 31
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Jones,K.A.,&Jones,J.L.(2008).Makingcooperativelearningworkinthecollegeclassroom:Anapplicationof the“fivepillars”ofcooperativelearningtopost-secondaryinstruction.JournalofEffectiveTeaching, 8,61-76.Kaddoura,M.A.(2011).Criticalthinkingskillsofnursingstudentsinlecture-basedteachingandcase-based learning,InternationalJournalfortheScholarshipofTeachingandLearning,5(2),Article20.Available at:http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol5/iss2/20Koffka,K.(1999).Principlesofgestaltpsychology.London:Routledge.(Originalworkpublished1935)Krathwohl,D.R.(2002).ArevisionofBloom’staxonomy:Anoverview.TheoryintoPractice,41,212-218.Lewin,K.(1935)Adynamictheoryofpersonality.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.Lewin,K.(1948)Resolvingsocialconflicts:Selectedpapersongroupdynamics.GW.Lewin(Ed.).NewYork: Harper&Row.Love,A.G.,Dietrich,A.,Fitzgerald,J.,&Gordon,D.(2014).Integratingcollaborativelearninginsideandoutside theclassroom.JournalonExcellenceinCollegeTeaching,25,177-196.Mayo,J.A.(2002).Case-basedinstruction:Atechniqueforincreasingconceptualapplicationinintroductory psychology.JournalofConstructivistPsychology,15,65-74.Mayo,J.A.(2004).Usingcase-basedinstructiontobridgethegapbetweentheoryandpracticeinpsychology ofadjustment.JournalofConstructivistPsychology,17,137-146.Mayo,J.A.(2010).Constructingundergraduatepsychologycurricula:Promotingauthenticlearningand assessmentintheteachingofpsychology.Washington,D.C.:AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.Mayo,J.A.(2013).Sociallyconstructedknowledge:Usingcooperativelearninginassessmentinstruction. PedagogyandtheHumanSciences,3(1),52-64.Available at:http://scolarworks.merrimack.edu8/phs/vol3/iss1/4Millis,B.J.(2002,October).Enhancinglearning—andmore!—throughcooperativelearning.Manhattan,KS:
TheIDEACenter.[IDEAPaperNo.38]Pariseau,S.E.&Kezim,B.(2007).Theeffectofusingcasestudiesinbusinessstatistics.JournalofEducationfor Business,83,27-31.Popham,W.J.(2014).Classroomassessment:Whatteachersneedtoknow(7thed.).UpperSaddleRiver,NJ: Pearson.Vygotsky,L.S.(1986).Thoughtandlanguage.Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress.(Originalworkpublished1962)Williams,R.B.(2007).Cooperativelearning:Astandardforhighachievement.ThousandOaks,CA:Corwin Press.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 32
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
DOESMINDFULNESSSTRENGTHENSELF-EFFICACYINFIRSTGRADESTUDENTS?KirstenL.Logan
UniversityofRichmond
ErikK.Laursen
UniversityofRichmond
AbstractExternalandinternalstressorsofteninfluenceyoungchildren’ssenseofself-efficacyandresiliencynegatively.Practicingmindfulnesswithintheclassroommaybeoneinterventionthatcanhelpstudentsstrengthenthesocial-emotionalskillsinvolvedinself-efficacyandresiliency.Thisstudyusedamixedmethodsapproachtogatherquantitativeandqualitativedatafromsixfirst-gradestudentswhoparticipatedinadailymindfulnesspractice.Thedatawereanalyzedusingdescriptivestatisticstodetermineiftheirperceptionsofself-efficacyandresiliencyimprovedfromweekonetoweeksixofthestudy.Logico-inductivedataanalyseswereusedtoidentifycommonthemesinstudentinterviews.Studentsfavoredthemindfulnessactivitiesandsharedbenefitssuchasfeelingcalm,happy,andasenseofself-control.Thesix-weektimeframeandsmallsamplesizearepossiblelimitationsforthisresearchstudytoshowsignificantdifferencesthroughthequantitativedataanalysis.
Keywords:teacheractionresearch,mindfulness,resiliency,self-efficacy,social-emotionallearning
Introduction
DuringKirsten’stimeasateacher,shehadobservedthatherstudents’lowsenseofself-efficacyappearedtoimpedetheirlearning.Commonbehaviorsrelatedtolowself-efficacyincludealowlevelofperseverance,i.e.,situationsinwhichstudentsbecomeeasilyfrustratedbymistakesorunknownanswers,self-talkfocusingonstudents’inabilitytocompleteatask,andalackofestablishing,workingtoward,andreflectingongoalswithintheclassroom.Kirstennoticedthatthesebehaviorswereovertakingmuchofthecoreinstructionaltimeforherstudents.Agreatdealoftheschooldayfocusedonthesenegativebehaviorsandprovidinginterventionstoaddressthembeforeeffectivelearningcouldoccur.Kirstenwasthereforeinterestedinfindingwaystostrengthenherstudents’self-efficacybyinvestigatingthefollowingquestion:Doesmindfulnessstrengthenself-efficacyinfirstgradestudents?
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 33
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Thepurposeofthisstudywastoexploreiftheimplementationofdailymindfulnesspracticesintheclassroomhaveapositiveeffectonfirstgradestudents’self-efficacy.Overasix-weekperiod,allstudentsinKirsten’sclassroomparticipatedinmindfulnesspracticesduringthemorningmeetingtime.Datawerecollectedfromsixstudentswhoparticipatedinone-on-oneinterviewsandcompletedaquestionnairethreetimes;atthebeginning,midpoint,andendofthestudy.
LiteratureReview
Mindfulnessisgaininginfluenceineducationandabodyofresearchoutlinesthebenefitsofimplementingmindfulnesspracticesintoclassroomsettings(e.g.,Costello&Lawler,2014;Harpin,Rossi,Kim,&Swanson,2016;Moreno,2017).Studentsfacemanychallengesthatcompetefortheirattentionduringschoolhours.MalowandAustin(2016)observedthatstudentstressandanxietycontinuetorise.Asaresult,educatorsmusttakeonthecrucialroletoexplicitlyteachstudentshowtomanagestrongemotionsbeforetheyimpedetheirsuccess.Harpinetal.(2016)identifiedaneedforstudents,specificallywithinurbansettings,tostrengthentheirabilitiestocopewithadversityandtoimprovetheirfocustobemoresuccessfulinschool.
Mindfulnesspracticeisonestrategytosupportstudentsindealingwithstressandanxiety.Mindfulnessis“thecognitiveabilitytopayattentiontothepresentmomentwithoutjudgmentorattachmenttoadesiredoutcome”(Kelleretal.,2017,p.508).Studentscanutilizemindfulnessbytakingastructured,peaceful,reflectivetimetopracticekeepingtheirthoughtsinthepresent.Mindfulnessinvolvesthreeinterconnectingcomponentsthatincludeintention,attention,andattitude.GreasonandCashwell(2009)describedmindfulnessasastateofbeingattentivetoexperienceswithanattitudeofopennessandacceptance.Kielty,Gilligan,andStaton(2017)emphasizedthatmindfulnessisapracticeinwhichindividualsfocusonthecurrentexperiencesratherthanbeingon“auto-pilot.”Increasingacademicdemands,coupledwiththelackofcopingskillstodealwithexternalstressors,oftenleadstoaconstantstateofstressthatcreatesbarriersforstudentsuccess.
Theabilitytopracticemindfulnessinanopenandacceptingwayisnotaninnateskill.Educatorsmustfosteraninvitingenvironmentforstudentstopracticemindfulnessaswellasstrategicallyteachstudentshowtomanagestrongemotionsbeforethesestrongemotionsunderminetheiracademic,social,andbehavioralsuccess(Malow&Austin,2016).TheNationalScientificCouncilontheDevelopingChild(2015)statesthatadultsmustbuildcapabilitiesneededtomanagestresswithinchildren,includingtheabilitytofocusattention,problemsolve,plan,adjusttonewcircumstances,regulatebehavior,andcontrolimpulses.Whenstudentsparticipateinanenvironmentthatfostersmindfulness,thebarriersthatstandbetweenthemandtheiracademic,social,andbehavioralsuccessoftendiminish.
ResiliencyandSelf-Efficacy.Students’abilitytocontroltheiremotions,thoughts,andbehaviorsisessentialforsuccessinschoolandinlife(Thierryetal.,2016).Prolongedandunresolvedinternalandexternalstressinhibitsstudentsfromdevelopingastrongsenseof
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 34
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
self-efficacyandresiliency.However,mindfulnesscanbeutilizedtostrengthenbothareas.Social-emotionallearning(SEL)curriculumsfocusondevelopingtheabilitytorecognizeone’sownemotions,aswellastheemotionsofothers,whileprovidingthenecessaryskillstocommunicateemotionalunderstanding(Malow&Austin,2016).SELcurriculumsfostertheimplementationofmindfulnessandthedevelopmentofresiliencyinstudents.MalowandAustin(2016)definedresiliencyas,“thedegreetowhichanindividual’spersonalresourcesmatchorexceedtheirreactivitytointernalorexternalstress”(p.83).Self-efficacy,definedas,“one’sbeliefsorjudgmentabouthisorhercapabilities”(Greason&Cashwell,2009,p.3),isalsonurturedwithinSELcurriculums.
Self-efficacydevelopmentistheorizedtooccurthroughfourprimarysources,includingmasteryexperiences,vicariouslearning,verbalpersuasion,andchangesinemotionalarousal(Greason&Cashwell,2009).Mindfulnessisapracticethatcanbeusedintheclassroomwiththesefoursourcesofself-efficacydevelopmentinmind.Theopen-endednatureofmindfulnessallowsstudentstofeelasenseofmasteryintheirownuniqueway,whilecontinuouslylearningnewstrategiesandpractices.
Mindfulnessallowsstudentstorecognizetheadverseeffectsof“mindtraps”andoffersaperiodofreflection,stillness,andpeace(Costello&Lawler,2014).Mindtrapsarementalhabitsthatincreasestress,suchasnegativeself-talkinwhichchildrenarehardonthemselves.Thesehabitscanincludeself-criticizing,wherestudentsperceivethemselvestobeworthlessorinadequate(Costello&Lawler,2014).Mindfulnesspracticescanhelpstudentsovercomethenegativeinfluenceofmindtrapsontheirperceptionsofself-efficacyandresiliency.
Inadditiontoresiliencyandself-efficacy,self-regulationandemotionalawarenessarecriticalskillsforstudentstomastertoallowthemtolearnefficiently,workwellwithothers,anddecreaseanxietyanddepression(Kelleretal.,2017).Mindfulnesspromotestheseskillsthroughdirectinstructionandteachesstudentsstrategiestheycanindependentlyutilizewithintheirdailyroutines.Withdailypractice,mindfulnesscanpositivelysupportemotionalself-regulation,whichconsequentlyimprovesthelikelihoodofacademicsuccess(Kelleretal.,2017).
BrainDevelopmentandNeuroplasticity.Criticalperiodsinachild’sdevelopmentaretimesduringwhichpositiveexperiencescanprovideoptimalbraindevelopment.However,iftheseexperiencesareabsentorreplacedbynegativeexperiences,healthybraindevelopmentcanbedisrupted(Lally,2012).Earlychildhoodisacriticalperiodinwhichthebrainismalleableandeasilyshapedbythechild’senvironment.Knowingthatbraindevelopmentisshapedbyearlyexperiences,muchofwhatgetsinthewayoflearninginlateryearsistheresultofskillsthatwereunderdevelopedorneglectedinearlychildhood.Ifstudentsareexpectedtobesuccessfulinschool,teachersmustprovideexperiencesthatsupporthealthybraindevelopment.Lally(2012)describesexperience-createdexpectationsthatimpactbraindevelopmentas“brainshaping”experiences.Theseexperiencesfluctuate
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 35
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
greatlyfromstudenttostudentandcanpresentawidecollectionofvariablesthatinterferewithlearning,suchasstressorsorenvironmentalfactors.
Mindfulnesssupportsstudents’developmentofskillsthatarenecessaryforschoolsuccess.Stress-reducingpractices,suchasmindfulness,cancontributetopositivebraindevelopmentandfunctioningwhilealsoreducingtheexpressionofpro-inflammatorygenes(NationalScientificCouncilontheDevelopingChild,2015).Overtime,dailymindfulnesspracticescanleadtohealthybraindevelopmentinchildrenandfillinthe“gaps”thatmayexistinmanystudents.Mindfulnesspractices,inconjunctionwiththebrain’sneuroplasticity,allowchildrentocontinuouslydevelopandstrengthenskills,suchassustainedattention,focus,andcalmnessintheschoolsetting(Kieltyetal.,2017).Researchhasalsoshownthatmindfulnesscanstrengthenneuralsystemsthatsupportemotional,cognitive,andbehavioralregulation(Thierryetal.,2016).
Awarenessofbraindevelopmentallowseducatorstoplanactivitiesthatstrengthenunderdevelopedskillsandsupportstudentsforlearningandacademicsuccess.Forexample,childrenbenefitfromlearninghowtoslowdowntheirthinkingtogivetheirbraintimetooverridenegativeresponsestoshutdownoractout(Moreno,2017).Mindfulnessoffersstudentsstrategiestoslowdowntheirthinkingandgivesthemtimetoreflectandrespond,ratherthannegativelyreactingtostressfulevents.Moreno(2017)showedthatsix-year-oldchildrenwhoparticipatedinmindfulnesspracticestrengthenedtheircapacitytoslowdowntheirthinkingandreflect.Kieltyetal.(2017)demonstratedthepositiveinfluenceofmindfulnessformiddleschoolstudentswhowereaskedtopracticemindfulbreathingtocalmtheamygdalaand“freeup”thepre-frontalcortexbeforeengaginginhigh-stakestesting.
GrowthMindsetandPositivePsychology.Mindfulnessprovidesopportunitiesforstudentstocultivateandpracticeagrowthmindset.Apersonwithagrowthmindsetcanbedescribedasanindividualwhobelievestheirintelligenceandabilitiescanbecontinuouslydevelopedandenhanced(Kieltyetal.,2017).Bothmindfulnessandagrowthmindsetfosterapositiveattitudethatiscenteredonpracticeratherthanperfection.Theopennatureofmindfulnessallowsforfeedbackandopportunitiestopracticeovercomingadversityandsetbacks.Mindfulnessalsoenablesstudentswithanoptimisticattitudeandwithbasictrustduringtimesofuncertainty(Malow&Austin,2016).
Positivepsychologyis“employingstructuredinterventionstobuildresiliencywiththegoalofbufferingsymptomsofemotionaldysregulation”(Malow&Austin,2016,p.84).Mindfulnessisoneexampleofastructuredinterventiontosupportpositivepsychologicalfeelings.Mindfulnesscanalsoaidinalleviatingdistressthroughself-regulatoryprocesses,suchasmindfulbreathing.Cultivatingthepositivityandoptimismalongsidemindfulnessallowsforopportunitiesforgrowth.Moreno(2012)describedmindfulnessbeingrootedinthebeautyoffailure,wherestudentsworktorecognizethatratherthananendpoint,mindfulnessfocusesonrepeatedengagementwithacycleoffocus-lossandfocus-refocus.Withagrowthmindset,failurepresentsitselfasacontinuedopportunitytostartanew,
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 36
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ratherthanafixedstoppingpoint.Routhier-Martin,Roberts,andBlanch(2017)stressedthatthepurposeofmindfulnessisnotforstudentstoforgetorrepresstheirstressorsorweaknesses,butrathertoacknowledgetheseareasforimprovementandpracticetheabilitytofocusonschoolworkinstead.
Insummary,social-emotionallearningandbraindevelopmentarefoundationalbuildingblocksforstudentstosucceedinschoolandinlife.Earlyexperiences,whetherpositiveornegative,impactbraindevelopment.Thelackofpositiveexperiencesinearlychildhoodcanimpedestudentsuccessandcreateaneedforinterventionslaterinlife.Mindfulnesspracticesintheclassroomareonetypeofinterventionstrategythatcanprovidestudentswithskillstodevelopandcultivateresiliency,astrongersenseofself-efficacy,emotionalawareness,andself-regulation.Pairingmindfulnesswithagrowthmindsetallowsforanoptimisticoutlookforgrowthinallstudents,nomattertheirbackgroundorseverityofstressorspresentintheirlives.Educatorswhoestablishmindfulnessroutinesandprocedureshelpstudentsunderstandthattheirintelligenceismalleableratherthanfixedandcanprovidestudentswithtoolsandstrategiestoovercomeadversitywithintheclassroomenvironment.Inaddition,teacherswhopracticemindfulnessthemselvescanhelpnurturemindfulnesswithintheirstudents.
Methodology
Design.Thisstudyusedamixed-methodmethodologycollectingdatafromsixstudentsonaLikertscalestylequestionnaireandfrominterviews.Open-endedquestionsandfollowuppromptswereusedtoexplorestudents’perceptionsofself-efficacyandtheimpactofthemindfulnessintervention.Interviewswererecorded,transcribed,andanalyzedforcommonthemes.Allinterviewsandquestionnaireswerecompletedinaquietspotintheclassroom,awayfromotherstudents.
ParticipantsandProcedure.All15studentsinKirsten’sfirst-gradeclassroomparticipatedinguidedmindfulnesspracticesoverasix-weekperiodusingaudioandvideoclipsfromGoNoodle(n.d.)andCalm(n.d.).Sixstudents,threemalesandthreefemales,wereselectedtocompleteaten-itemquestionnaireandtobeinterviewedtoexploretheirperceptionsofself-efficacy.Thesurveyincludedtenquestionswiththreepossibleresponses,yes,sometimes,andno.Acompositescorewasgiventoeachofthequestionnairesbyconvertingthesmilefacetothreepoints,theneutralfacetotwopoints,andthefrowningfacetoonepoint,yieldingapossiblescoreforeachstudentbetween10and30points.Ascoreof30indicateahighlevelofself-efficacyandalowerscorealesserdegreeofself-efficacy.Kirstenselectedthesesixstudentsbecauseoftheiropennesstoengageinone-on-oneconversationswithher.
Thequestionnaireincludedtenquestionsaskingstudentstoreflectontheirperceptionsoftheirself-efficacyandresiliencyskills.Thestudentscompletedthequestionnaireatthebeginningofthestudy,atthemidpoint(weekthree),andattheendofthestudyaftersixweeks.Thethree-pointLikertscaleutilizedsymbolsforthefirstgradestudentstoeasily
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 37
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
answerthequestions:asmilefaceforyes,aneutralfaceforsometimes,andafrowningfaceforno(seeTable1).
Table1:StudentQuestionnaire
Yes
Sometimes
No
1Iworkhardinschool.
2IcannameatleastonethingIamgoodat.
3Itrymybestatschooleveryday.
4 Icansolvemostproblemsbymyself.
5 Icanfinishallmyschoolwork.
6 IcancalmmyselfdownwhenIamangryorfrustrated.
7 Ipayattentiontomyteacherinclass.
8 IaskforhelpwhenIneedit.
9 Ikeeptrying,evenwhenthingsgethardortough.
10Icanmakeagoalformyselftoworktowards.
Thequalitativedatawerecollectedthroughfouropen-endedinterviewquestionsandfollow-upquestionswereusedtoexpandonstudents’thinking.Theinterviewswereadministeredatthesamethreepointsthroughouttheresearchstudyasthequestionnaire.Theinterviewswererecorded,transcribed,andanalyzedforcommonthemesinstudentresponsesusingthelogico-inductiveprocess(Mertler,2019)tomakesenseofthenarrativedata.Theinterviewquestionsincludedthefollowing:
1. Whatisyourfavoritepartofdoingmindfulnessactivities?
2. Domindfulnessactivitiesmakeyoufeellikeyouhaveself-control?Ifyes,howso?
3. Whatmindfulnessstrategieshaveyouusedthroughouttheschoolday?
4. Whatfeelingsdoyoufeelwhenwedomindfulnessactivities?
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 38
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Results
Thesurveydatafromthequestionnairewassummarizedforthesixstudentsandthemeanandrangewereusedtocompareparticipants’answersbetweenthethreetimesthequestionnairewasadministered(Table2).Theresultsshowthattwostudentsincreasedtheirself-efficacyscoresoverthesixweeks,whilefourshowedadecrease.Themeanvariedslightlybetweenthethreesurveysandtherangebetweenstudentsdecreasedfromanine-pointrangewithinthefirstweektoafive-pointrangewithinthesixthweekofthestudy.Theresultssuggestthatthestudentsperceivedthemindfulnesspracticesfavorablywithameanscoreconsistentlyabove25,butdonotindicatethatstudentsincreasedtheirperceptionoverthesix-weekperiodoftheintervention.
Table2:StudentResponsestoQuestionnaire
Student Week1 Week3 Week6
M 30 28 26
E 21 25 26
H 29 29 30
K 28 21 26
A 26 26 25
L 25 24 25
Mean 26.5 25.5 26.3
Range 9 8 5
Aftertheinterviewsweretranscribed,commonstatementswerecoded.Usinglogico-inductiveanalysis(Mertler,2019)patternsandtrendswereidentifiedfromthestudentinterviews.Twopatternsemergedfromthestudentresponses.In15ofthe18interviewsstudentsidentifiedfeelingcalmafterparticipatinginamindfulnesspractice.Fiveofthesixstudentsfeltthatmindfulnesshelpedthemcalmdown.StudentHsaid,“they[themindfulnesspractices}calmmybodydown,”andStudentLfeltthat“ithelpsourbrainscalm.”Feelinghappyduringthemindfulnesspracticewasanotherpatterndiscoveredinten
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 39
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
interviewsasillustratedbyStudentL’scomment:“Itfeelslikeayummystrawberry.”Thefollowingtrendswerenotedfromacrossallinterviews,studentssharedthattheywereinterestedintryingthemindfulnessactivities.Fouroutofsixparticipantssaidthatmindfulnessactivitiesmadethemfeeltheyhadself-controlattheendofweekone.Attheendofweekthree,allstudentsreportedfeelingcalmwhenpracticingmindfulness,andfivestudentsreportedthattheactivitiesmadethemfeeltheyhadself-control.Attheendofweeksix,allstudentsreportedthatmindfulnessactivitiesprovidedthemwithasenseofself-control.Whenaskedwhatspecificidentifymindfulnessstrategiesstudentsusedthroughouttheschoolday,studentswereunabletoidentifyspecificstrategies.Insummary,studentswereeagertotryandwerereceptivetomindfulnessactivitiesandexpressedthattheyfeltastrongsenseofself-efficacyfollowingthemindfulnesspractices.
Thepurposeofthisstudywastoexploreifdailymindfulnesspracticesstrengthensself-efficacyinfirstgradestudents.Theresultsofthesurveysshowthatthesixstudentswhoparticipatedinthestudydidnotincreasetheirself-efficacyoverthesix-weekperiodofthestudy.However,intheinterviews,studentsexpressedthatmindfulnesspracticesmadethemhappyandhelpedthemcalmtheirbodiesandbrainsleadingtoasenseofself-control.Research(e.g.,Abdel-Khaleketal.,2014,Tahmasbipour,2017,Zakeretal.,2016),thoughnotdonewithelementarystudents,showastrongrelationshipbetweenhappinessandself-efficacy.Additionally,calmnessandself-controlareessentialelementsofself-efficacy.Insummary,theresultsofthestudentinterviewsshowthatstudentsexperiencedhappiness,calmness,andself-controlafterparticipatinginmindfulnesspractices,allessentialelementstodevelopingself-efficacy.
Discussion
Kirstenwaseagertoimplementmindfulnesswithinherfirst-gradeclassroom.Althoughshehadreceivednoformaltraininginmindfulnesspriortotheimplementationofthisstudy,sheresearchedbestpracticesandstrategiesthatwouldbeappropriateforherfirstgradestudents.Oneofthegreatesttakeawaysofhavingtheroleas“mindfulleader”forherstudentsisthepatienceherstudentsshowedintheclassroom.Shebeganthemindfulnessactivitieswithanopenmindset,whichallowedhertoguidethestudentsthroughthepracticeswithoutexpectingthatallstudentswouldreactinthesamemanner.Somestudentsshowedreluctancetoparticipateinthemindfulnessactivities,butwithhergrowthmindset,Kirstensawgrowthinallherstudentsduringthissix-weekperiod.Workingwithyoungerstudents,thepracticesweretakenmoreseriouslyandintentionallybytheendofthisstudybyallstudents.Studentsweremoreopenandwillingtosharetheirreflectionsduringthemorningmeetingtimeaswell.Theoverallcultureofthestudents’reflectivenaturewasonepositivebenefitthatKirstenobservedthroughoutthestudy.
Limitations
Thepresentstudyhasseverallimitations.Withasamplesizeofsixstudentsfromthesameschoolandreceivingmindfulnessactivitiesthroughthesamemethod,thefindingscannotbegeneralizedtoagreaterpopulation.Further,Kirsten’sdualroleasateacherandresearchermayhaveinfluencedthestudents’answersonthequestionnaires,despitebeing
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 40
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
madeawarethattheiranswerwasinnowaygoingtoinfluencetheiracademicgrade.Theshorttimeframeofthisstudymayalsolimitthestudybynotallowingstudentssufficienttimetopracticeandreflectontheimpactofmindfulnessactivities.Finally,askingsix-andseven-yearoldstudentstoreflectontheirperceptionsthroughthequestionnaireandinterviewquestionsmaynothavebeendevelopmentallyappropriateforallparticipants,e.g.,“Icanmakeagoalformyselftoworktowards.”
Implications
Thisstudyprovidedinsighttotherolemindfulnessactivitieshaveintheclassroomsetting.Studentswereeagerandwillingtoparticipateindailymindfulnessactivitiesandclassdiscussions.Werecommendthatteachersintroducemindfulnessactivitiesatthebeginningoftheschoolyear,pairingthemwithothersocial-emotionallearningconceptssuchasfosteringagrowthmindsetandcharacterstrengths(ViaInstituteonCharacter,n.d.).Implementingmindfulnessactivitiesisonestrategytohelpstudentsstrengthenself-efficacyandresiliency.
Teacherswhowishtoimplementmindfulnesspracticeswithintheclassroommustfosterandcreateanopenandinvitingclassroomcultureforstudentstopracticemindfulness.Theclassroomschedulemustallowforperiodsofcalmnessforstudentstopracticemeditationandreflection.Aspracticingmindfulnessandself-reflectionarenotinnateskills,especiallyforyoungstudents,werecommendthatteachersspendseveralweeksatthebeginningoftheschoolyearintroducingthetopicofbeingmindfulandfosteringagrowthmindset.Studentscanbeencouragedtoprogressattheirownpacethroughoutthemindfulnessjourney.Wealsorecommendedthatteacherssetasideatimeofdaytopracticeamindfulnessactivityfortheclass.Asstudentsgrowmorecomfortablewiththestrategieslearnedinthescheduledmindfulnessactivities,studentsshouldalsobegivenopportunitiestoapplythesestrategiesthroughouttheschoolday.Intentionalconversations(Laursen,2018)and“teachablemoments”shouldbeutilizedforstudentstoidentifyperiodsofthedayinwhichmindfulnesspracticescanbeutilized.Inelementarygrades,theteachercanserveasthemodelbyusinga“thinkingoutloud”modelinwhichtheteacherexplicitlydemonstratesaperiodofthedayinwhichamindfulnesspractice,suchasdeepbreathingorabodyscan,canbeusedintheclassroom.
Conclusion
Weencourageschoolleaderstoprovideteacherswhoarewillingandreadytotakeontheincorporationofmindfulnesspracticeswithprofessionaldevelopmentonbeinga“mindfulleader.”Thereareprofessionaldevelopmentworkshopsandonlineclassesthatcanbeutilizedforteacherstobecomefamiliarwithdifferentprogramsandmindfulnessactivities.Teacherswhopracticeandfamiliarizethemselveswithmindfulnessfirstwillhaveasmoothertransitionimplementingitwithintheirownclassroom.
Finally,wesuggestthatteachersreflectonstudents’perceptionsofmindfulnessactivitiesandtheimpactonstudents’self-efficacyandresiliency.Follow-upresearchonwaysto
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 41
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
measurestudentperceptionsofmindfulnesspracticesissuggestedtobestfittheagegroupofstudentswhoareparticipatinginmindfulnesspractices.
AbouttheAuthors
KirstenL.Logan,M.Ed.iscurrentlyafirstgradeteacherinVirginia.ShereceivedherundergraduatedegreefromAshlandUniversityinAshland,OhioinEarlyChildhoodEducationandhermaster’sdegreeinCurriculumandInstructionfromtheUniversityofRichmondinRichmond,Virginia.Herresearchinterestsincludegrowthmindset,mindfulness,positivebehaviorinterventions,andsocialemotionallearningcurricula.Email:[email protected]
ErikK.Laursen,Ph.D.isanAdjunctAssociateProfessorintheDepartmentofEducationattheUniversityofRichmond.Heteachestheactionresearchcourseandworkswithhisgraduatestudentstopublishtheresultsoftheirclassroom-basedprojects.Hisresearchinterestsareinpositiveeducation,caringrelationships,andcharacterstrengths.Healsoteacheseducatorsinyouthworkersintraumainformedpractices.Dr.LaursenreceivedhisdoctoraldegreefromVirginiaCommonwealthUniversity.Email: [email protected]
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 42
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ReferencesAbdel-Khalek,A.M.,ElNayal,M.(2014).Happinessanditsrelationwithself-efficacyamonguniversity
students.PaperpresentedatYouthandSocietyConference:KuwaitUniversity,Kuwait.Retrievedfromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/292318063_Happiness_and_its_relation_with_self-efficacy_among_university_students
Calm(n.d.).Retrievedfromhttp://www.calm.comCostello,E.,&Lawler,M.(2014).Anexploratorystudyoftheeffectsofmindfulnessonperceivedlevelsof
stressamongschool-childrenfromlowersocioeconomicbackgrounds.TheInternationalJournalofEmotionalEducation,6(2),21-39.Retrievedfromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085614
GoNoodle(n.d.).Retrievedfromhttp://www.gonoodle.comGreason,P.B.,&Cashwell,C.S.(2009).Mindfulnessandcounselingself-efficacy:Themediatingroleof
attentionandempathy.AmericanCounselingAssociation,49,2-17.doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2009.tb00083
Harpin,S.B.,Rossi,A.,Kim,A.K.,&Swanson,L.M.(2016).Behavioralimpactsofamindfulnesspilot
interventionforelementaryschoolstudents.Education,137(2),149-156.Retrievedfromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1121526
Keller,J.,Ruthruff,E.,Keller,P.,Hoy,R.,Gaspelin,N.,&Bertolini,K.(2017).Yourbrainbecomesarainbow:
Perceptionsandtraitsof4th-gradersinaschool-basedmindfulnessintervention.JournalofResearchinChildhoodEducation,31(4),508-529.doi:10.1080/02568543.2017.1343212
Kielty,M.L.,Gilligan,T.D.,&Staton,A.R.(2017).Whole-schoolapproachestoincorporatingmindfulness-
basedinterventions:Supportingthecapacityforoptimalfunctioninginschoolsettings.JournalofResearchinChildhoodEducation,93(2),128-135.doi:10.1080/00094056.2017.1300491
Lally,J.R.(2012).Wantsuccessinschool?Startwithbabies!KappaDeltaPiRecord,48,10-16.doi:
10.1080/00228958.2012.654713Laursen,E.K.(2018).Intentionalresponsiveadultpractices:Supportingkidstonotonlyovercomeadversity,
buttothrive.Raleigh,NC:LuluPublishing.Malow,M.S.,&Austin,V.L.(2016).Mindfulnessforstudentsclassifiedwithemotional/behavioraldisorder.
InsightsintoLearningDisabilities,13(1),81-94.Retrievedfromhttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103673.pdf
Mertler,C.A.(2019).Introductiontoeducationalresearch(2nded.).LosAngeles,CA:SagePublications.Moreno,A.J.(2017).Atheoreticallyandethicallygroundedapproachtomindfulnesspracticesintheprimary
grades.ChildhoodEducation,93(2),100-108.doi:10.1080/00094056.2017.1300487NationalScientificCouncilontheDevelopingChild.(2015).Supportiverelationshipsandactiveskill-building
strengthenthefoundationsofresilience:Workingpaper13.Retrievedfromhttp:/www.developingchild.harvard.edu
Routhier-Martin,K.,Roberts,S.K.,Blanch,N.(2017).Exploringmindfulnessandmeditationforthe
elementaryclassroom:Intersectionsacrosscurrentmultidisciplinaryresearch.ChildhoodEducation,93(2),168-175.doi:10.1080/00094056.2017.1300496
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 43
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Tahmasbipour,N.(2017).Predictingself-efficacybasedonhappinessamongShahidRajaeeTeacherTrainingUniversityStudents,Iran.WorldJournalofSocialScienceResearch4(2),122-128.Retrievedfromhttp://www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/wjssr
Thierry,K.L.,Bryant,H.L.,Nobles,S.S.,Norris,K.S.(2016).Two-yearimpactofamindfulness-basedprogram
onpreschoolers’self-regulationandacademicperformance.EarlyEducationandDevelopment,27(6),805-821.doi:10.1080/10409289.2016.1141616
VIAInstituteonCharacter(n.d.).Retrievedfromhttp://www.viacharacter.org/www/ZakerA,DadsetanA,NasiriZ,Nasiri,Z.,Azimi,S.,Rahmana,F.(2016).Effectivenessofhappinessonself-
efficacyofstudents.ElectronicJournalofBiology,12(4).Retrievedfromhttp://ejbio.imedpub.com/effectiveness-of-happiness-on-selfefficacy-of-students.php?aid=9891
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 44
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
“LETTHEPEOPLESING!”–ACTIONRESEARCHEXPLORINGTEACHERS’MUSICALCONFIDENCEWHENENGAGINGLEARNERSIN‘SINGINGFORWELLBEING’DaphneRickson
NewZealandSchoolofMusic-TeKōkī ,VictoriaUniversityofWellington
JoAtkinson
MarshlandSchool
DianneReynolds
WaitākiriSchool
RobertLegg
HeadofMusic,IcknieldCommunityCollege,UnitedKingdom
AbstractTheexaminationandreconstructionofpersonalbeliefsandchangeinpracticethatcomeswithactionresearchcanbeintellectuallyandemotionallydemanding.Actionresearchexploringtheprocessof“singingforwellbeing,”ataChristchurchprimaryschoolseverelyaffectedbythe2010-2011earthquakes,uncoveredtheinterestingdichotomythatteacherswhowerepassionateaboutengagingchildreninsingingwereuncomfortablesingingthemselves.Acriticalactionresearchorientationgaveteachersimpetusandtimetodiscoverandreflectontheirpersonalhistories,toengagewithrelevantliterature,andtoexplorestrategiestoincreasetheirconfidencetoengageinmusicactivitieswithlearners.Learningthatmusicalconfidencecanbeseverelyaffectedbythenegativejudgementsofothers,andthatlackofteacherconfidenceintheartsiswidespread(Bainger,2010),validatedtheirexperiences,increasedtheirself-understanding,andenabledthemtosingwiththeirlearnerswithincreasingconfidence.Ourfindingsreinforcedthehypothesisthatunpackingnegativeexperiencescanbealmostasimportantinsomecasesasacquiringknowledgeandskillsinmusic.
Keywords:teacheractionresearch,teachers,musicalconfidence,singing,wellbeing
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 45
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Introduction
WaitākiriSchoolinChristchurchopenedin2014,aspartofthelargerrestructuringofChristchurchschoolsfollowingthe2010-2011earthquakes.Atthattime,ourteachersbegantoengagelearnersinsingingeverydaytodevelopandmaintainasenseofcommunity,andtopromoteenjoymentandreadinesstolearn.Despiteexperiencingsignificantongoingchallengesassociatedwithapost-earthquakeenvironment,well-beingandengagementdataindicatedthatlearnerscontinuedtofeelsafe,valuedandsupported.Membersoftheschoolcommunityjoineduniversityresearchersinanactionresearchprojecttoexaminethewaysinwhichthesingingwasfacilitatedandsustained,andtheperceivedrelationshipbetweensingingandwell-being.Wehavereportedthesefindingselsewhere(Rickson,Legg&Reynolds,2018;Rickson,Reynolds&Legg,2018),andinthispaperfocusononeaspectofourtwo-yearactionresearchproject;specifically,ourexplorationofteachers’self-efficacywithregardtosinging.
Theschoolhasbeendesignedtopromotecollaborativeteachinginflexiblelearningspaces.Itiscomprisedofsixlearningstudios;eachdesignedtocaterforapproximately115childrenworkingwith4-5teachersandonetotwolearningassistants.Ourteacher-researcherswerepassionateaboutsinging,stronglybelievedthatsingingwassupportingthewell-beingoflearnersinourschool,andwerecommittedtomaintainingdailysinginginthelearningstudios.Yetthedialogicactionresearchprocessallowedthemtorecognisethatdespitetheirpassionforengaginglearnersindailysinging,sixoftheeightwerenotconfidentsingersthemselves.Itseemedtheywereabletosuccessfullyfacilitatethedailysinging,despitehavinglowself-efficacywithregardtomusic,byconstructingacleardifferentiationbetween‘singingforwellbeing’and‘musiceducation’,andpromotingsingingforwell-beingasfunactivitywhichinvolvedfewexpectations(Rickson,Legg&Reynolds,2018).Engaginginwhatmightbedescribedasa‘spin-offcycle’(McNiff,1988)ouractionresearchtookacriticalturnaswebegantoexaminetheprocessesthatwereinhibitingteachers’abilitytosingingfreelywithlearnersintheclassroom,andelsewhere.
LiteratureReview
Singingcanbehelpfulnotonlyinfosteringindividualwellbeinginsingers,butalsoinunitinggroups(Ilari,Chen-Hafteck&Crawford,2013).Participatingingroupsingingleadstocommonpurpose,developingcohesionwithinagroupculture,throughacommonsetofattitudesandbehaviour(Drummond,2012,p.305).Thesynchronisationofbodiesandvoicestoapulse,alongwithsharedemotionalexpression,canbepowerfulinpromotinggroupbonding(Kirschner&Tomasello,2010;Sutherland,2015),andperformingwithotherscangiveparticipantsasenseoffulfilment,prideandaccomplishment(Sutherland,2015).
Thevocalisationsofbabiesandtheircaregiversismusical(Barrett,2005;Trevarthen,2002;Wiggins,2015),and‘singing’emergesininfancyandcontinuestodevelopaschildreninteractwithothersintheirenvironments(Ilarietal.,2013;Welch,2005).Fromthesongsofchildrenwecandeducethatmusical‘ability’isuniversal(Campbell,2010;Ilari,Chen-
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 46
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Hafteck&Crawford,2013)andthat,althoughweneedtotraininordertodevelopandexerciseourpotential,allpeoplehavethecapacitytobemusical(Lamont,2011).Thatis,wecanallenjoymusicthroughlistening,singing,andmoving,regardlessofwhetherwehavehadopportunitiestotakemusiclessons(Ilarietal.,2013;Thorn&Brasche,2015).Moreover,singingdoesnotrequiretheuseofexternalinstrumentsorhighlyspecialisedteachersandisthereforearelativelylowcostwayofengagingchildreninmusic(Lamont,Daubney&Spruce,2012).
Nevertheless,ourabilitytocontinuesingingbeyondpreschoolyearsisaffectedbyhowpeoplearoundusviewoursinging(Welch,2005).Ourviewofourmusicalselvesisbasedonourbeliefstakenfromsociety,andinordertorealizeourinbornmusicalabilitiesweneedtoestablishastrongmusicalidentitythatreinforcesabeliefthatwearemusical(Ilari,Chen-Hafteck&Crawford,2013).Culturalassociationsguideourthinkingaboutwhatwesoundlikewhensingingsoloorwithagroup,andwelearntoassessourselvesas‘good’or‘notsogood’singersinaccordingtooursocio-culturalcontexts(Ilari,Chen-Hafteck&Crawford,2013;Welch,2005).InWesternculturespeopleareoftenidentifiedas‘singers’or‘non-singers’andsinginginpublicisconsideredtobeaperformanceforthe‘talented’singer(Ilari,Chen-Hafteck&Crawford,2013;Welch,2005).Consequently,peoplewhosesingingdevelopmenthasbeenheldupinsomewayareoftencategorisedassomeonewho‘cannotsing’(Sloboda,Wise,&Peretz,2005)andastheygrowolder,manypeoplerefusetosinginanycircumstances,whileothersrefusetosingwheretheycanbeheard(West,2009).
Theviewsheldbysignificantothers,particularlymusicteachers,affectchildren’sself-conceptinpowerfulways(Abril,2007;Turton&Durrant,2002).Formativeexperienceswhicharenegativeordiscouragingcanhavelifelongdamagingeffects;includingthebeliefthatitistoolatetolearnmusicasanadult(Pitts,2015).Anumberofadultswhoarenolongermusicallyactivesuggesttheir‘lackoftalent’preventsthemfromengaginginmusic(Lamont,2011;Sloboda,Wise&Peretz,2005;Welch,2005)andmanyofthesepeoplealsoreportnegativeexperiencesatsomepointintheirchildhoodmusiceducation,suchasbeingtoldnottosingoutloudinprimaryschoolchoirs(Lamont,2011;Welch,2005).Lamontfoundthatnearly20%of530amateuradultmusic-makersfromaroundtheworldhadarelativelynegativemusicalidentitydespitethefactthattheywereactivelyinvolvedinmakingmusic(Lamont,2011).Singingisaverypersonalact(Ilari,Chen-Hafteck&Crawford,2013;Campbell,2010).Criticismofsingingabilitythereforeseemstohaveastrongerinfluenceonanindividual’sperceptionoftheirmusicalselfthancriticismofothermusicabilitiessuchasinstrumentalskills,becauseitfeelsmuchmorelikeapersonalattack(Swain&Bodkin-Allen,2014).Whenchildrenarelabelledasnon-singersitcanstigmatisethemforlifeandstopthemfromsinginginanycontext(Whidden,2008).
Teachersinclassrooms-eveninearlychildhoodsettings,wherechildrenareconstantlysinging–oftenlackconfidenceintheirownsingingabilities(Heyning,2011;Russell-Bowie,2009;Swain&Bodkin-Allen2017)andaremoreapprehensiveaboutteachingmusicthanmostotherschoolsubjects(Hargreaves,Lamont,Marshall,&Tarrant,2003;Heyning,2011;Russell-Bowie,2009;Thorn&Brasche,2015)becauseofthecomplexityofthedisciplineand
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 47
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
theirself-perceivedlackoftalentformusic(Thorn&Brasche,2015).Manyteachersstillbelievesingingisa‘gift’forthe‘talented’andthatonlymusicallytalentedpeoplecanteachmusicintheclassroom(Heyning,2011).Further,teacherswhomayhavelowself-efficacywithregardtosinging,arebattlingacrowdedcurriculum,arefeelingover-scrutinisedandlosingconfidence,andinourcasemanagingsignificantchallengesassociatedwithlivingandworkinginapost-earthquakeenvironment.
Ontheotherhand,teachersaregenerallymoreconfidenttosingwithchildrenthanwithadults,andwhentheyarepreparedtohaveagotheycanhaveapositiveexperience(ThornandBrasche,2015).Moreover,singingandothermusicalbehaviourscanimprovewithbothformalandinformalexperience(Sloboda,Wise,&Peretz,2005).Theincreasingpopularityofinclusivecommunitysinginggroupsforadultsforexample,maybebeginningtocountertheimpactthatnegativecriticismandjudgementhadonmanyadultsaschildren(Davidson2011;Lamont,2011).
Methodology
‘SingingforWell-being’wasatwo-yearActionResearch(AR)project,fundedbytheNewZealandgovernmentTeachingandLearningResearchInitiative(TLRI)andapprovedbyVictoriaUniversityofWellingtonhumanethicscommittee(Approval#22081).Actionresearchinthiscontextisasystematic,participatoryapproach,inwhicheducationpractitionersthemselvesaimtopromotepositivechangeintheirschoolcommunity(Hine&Lavery,2014;Mertler,2010).
Participants.Forthisparticularphaseofourproject,eightgeneralclassroomteachers,onespecialistmusicteacherandonekapahakatutor(KapahakaisthetermforMāoriperformingarts),collaboratedwithacoreresearchteaminvolvingtworesearchersfromVictoriaUniversityofWellingtonandtheDeputyPrincipalofWaitākiriSchool.
Method.Actionresearchisdynamicinnatureandisfrequentlydescribedasamessyorchaoticexperience(Nyanjom,2017;Mikkelsen2013).Researchersoftenbeginwithbroadquestionswhicharedevelopedandrefinedthroughcyclesofcriticalreflectionanddialogue,whichinturnleadtofurtheroralternativeaction(Cardno,2003).Eachcycleinvolvesplanning,acting,reflectinganddiscussingresults(Mertler,2010),whileengagingincontinuousexplorationoftherelevantliteraturewhichinforms,inspiresandclarifiesemergingfindings.Cyclesarenotlinear,butinvolvea“fluid,iterative,open,complex,andresponsiveprocess”(Cordeiro,Soares&Rittenmeyer,2017,p.397).Inaprocessofopendialogue,ideasthataretentativelyarticulatedinreflection,canbeexaminedmoresystematicallyinsubsequentphasesofactiveexploration.ActionResearchthereforeoffersopportunitiestodealwithanumberofproblemsatthesametimethroughthedevelopmentof‘spin-offcycles’(McNiff,1988).
Thispaperreportsonesuchphaseofourresearch,specificallyourexplorationofanearlyfindingthatdespitetheirpassionforsupportingchildrentosing,sixoutoftheeightclassroomteacherswhowereco-researchersonthisprojectwerenotconfidentsingersthemselves.Heyning(2011)arguesthatteacherswhoareconfidentandcompetentsingers
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 48
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
aremorelikelytoengagechildreninsinging,andtodoitsuccessfully.Yetatourschool,teacherswhoweredecidedlylackinginsingingconfidencewereabletointroduceandsustaindailysingingspecificallytoaddressthewell-beingofteachersandlearners.
ResearchQuestion.Weexaminedtheabovedichotomybysharingourpersonalhistories,engagingwiththeliterature,andcriticallyreflectingontheimpactofourvaluesandbeliefstoanswerthequestion“Whataretheprocessesthatareinhibitingteachers’abilitytosingingfreelywithlearnersintheclassroom,andelsewhere;andhowcansingingconfidencebeincreased.
Datagathering.Dataweredrawnfromtwosemi-structuredfocusgroupsinvolvingeightclassroomteachers,individualinterviewswithfourgeneralistteachersandtheschool’sspecialistmusicteacher,andengagementwiththeliterature.Focusgroupsandinterviewswereruninflexibleways,andinitialprompts/questionswerebroad(e.g.‘Canwetalkaboutourexperiencesoffacilitatingsingingintheclassroom?’)toallowparticipantstodiscussandtodeveloptheirownunderstandingofthingsthatwereimportanttothem(Liamputtong,2011).Itwascrucialtoallowparticipantstocontinuetalking,toshapethetopicandconversation,andtointroducesometimesunexpectedbutrelevantinformationthatwasmeaningfulandimportanttothem(Hesse-Biber&Leavy,2010).Thustheywereabletoproviderichdescriptionsoftheirexperiences,andtoacquirein-depthknowledgeaboutthethingsthattheyfeltwereimportant.Inthelaterfocusgroupandindividualinterviewswefocusedmoreonthechangeprocessusingpromptssuchas‘Tellmeaboutanychangesyouhavenoticedwithregardtoyourattitudeorimplementationofmusicwithyourlearners?’‘Howdidthosechangescomeabout?’‘Howimportantdoyouthinkthesechangesmightbeintermsofyourfuturethinking/developmentasteacherswhousemusicintheclassroom?’
DataAnalysis.Datawereanalysedbythefirstauthorusingaprocessofinductivethematicanalysis(Braun&Clarke,2013),andpeerreviewedbythefourthauthor.Theprocessinvolved:
• Transcribingtheaudiomaterialfromthefocusgroupsandinterviewsverbatim
• Returningmanuscriptstoparticipantsinvitingtheirchecking,editingandadditionalcomments
• Listeningtotheaudio,andreadingthetranscriptstobecomefamiliarwiththedata
• Identifyingrelevantchunksoftranscript,andgivingtheminitialcodes
• Transferringthechunksofdata,withinitialcodesinaseparatecolumn,toexcelsheets
• Combiningdatabycreatingamasterexcelsheet,andsortingaccordingtoinitialcodes
• Reviewingthecodes,andrenaming,combininganddevelopingnewcodes
• Sortingcodesintobroadcategories
• Examiningeachcategoryandapplyingsecondarycoding
• Sortingbysecondarycodes,anddevelopingdescriptionsofcodes
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 49
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
• Renaming,combininganddevelopingnewsecondarycodesasneeded
• Sortingaccordingtosecondarycodesandrevisingdescriptionstodevelopthemes(ideasgeneratedbyseveralparticipants),exceptions(ideasmentionedbyonlyoneperson),concepts(combinationsofideas),andstories(examplesfrompractice)
• Reproducingthemes,exceptionsandconceptsintheformoffindings
• Returningfindingstoparticipantsfortheircomment/editing.
ResultsandDiscussion
Acriticalactionresearchorientationisemployedwhentransformativeactionneedstobeprecededbycriticalthinkingandreflection(Kemmis,2014).Theprocessofexaminingpersonalexperiencesalongsidetheoriesreportedintheliteraturewascrucialtothepersonaltransformationthatteachersdescribed.Theparagraphsbelowthereforeincludeactionsandreflectionsinterspersedwithrelevantliterature.InitialProblem:Ifmusicisforeveryonewhydowefeelwearenotmusical?Webeganourresearchwiththeassumptionthatmusicalityisinnate.Teachersalreadyagreedthatmusicisforeveryone,notjustan‘elite’few,andthatsingingisan‘equalising’,‘accessible’andhighlymotivatingactivity.Welearntfromtheliteraturethatinfantsengageinmusicalinteractionwithcaregivers(Barrett,2005;Trevarthen,2002;Wiggins,2015);andyoungchildren,acrosscultures,engageinmusicalplay(Campbell,2010;Wiggins,2015).Childrenareinitiatorsofmusicalactivities(Burnard,2013),musicalideas(Wiggins,2007)andmusicalinnovations(Marsh,2009)andsingingisanatural,spontaneous,meansofcommunicationforthem(Bodkin-Allen,2009;Campbell,2010).Yetdespiteourunderstandingthatmusicianshipisinnate,sixofoureightgeneralclassroomteacher/researchersvariouslyclaimedtheywere‘notmusicians’,‘notmusical’,orthey‘couldn’tsing’.
Iwouldn’tknowifIwassinginganotecorrectlyornot.Idon’thavethatkindofear.Barbara,IndividualInterview
Action:Reflectingonone’sbeliefs.Jo,oneofourstudioteachers,recognisedshehadafearofsinging,whichstemmedfrombeingtold,"Youdon'tsingverywell",asachild.Shedescribedbecoming“frightenedofmusic”,“puttingupawall”anddeciding,“Rightthen!”,shewasnotgoingtodoitanymore.Atteacherscollege,shewasrequiredtolearntherecorderandguitar,andfeltshutdownevenfurtherbytutorswhoseemedtolackpassionfortheirsubject.Perhapsmoreimportantlysheexperiencedhermusicmoduleashighlyjudgemental.Shewasshockedwhenoneofhertutorstoldhernottosingbutto“humalong”towhatshedescribesasher"dreadfulmusicmaking".Ontheotherhand,Joadmitsthatsheenteredteacher'scollegealreadybelievingmusicwasanareashewasnotgoodat,andthatimprovementwouldbeunlikely.Yetsheloveslisteningtomusic,singinginprivate,dancing,andlisteningtochildrensinging.Sheevendescribedfeeling“desperatetosing"butstill“won’tlet(her)voicecomeout"ifotherpeoplearearound.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 50
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Suetoo,suggestedshelovessingingand“singsloud,inprivate.”WhenwebeganourresearchSuedescribedfeeling“abitoutofmydepthhere”.Sheexplained:
Ilearntpianoasachild,butI’mjustprivatewithmusic.IhadareallybadexperienceactuallywhenItrainedinitiallyasakindergartenteacher.Weallsattogetherinonegroupandweallhadtosing–thenitwaspointedouttouseverythingthatwedidwrong.Andeversincethatpoint,whenIwasprobablyabout18-19,Idon’tsing–unlessI’msingingwithwholelotofotherpeople.…Irememberitall.Sue,focusgroupcontribution
Action:Professionaldevelopmentworkshops.Itwasclearthatourteacherswereenthusiasticaboutfacilitatingdailysingingforwell-being,yetmosthadlittleconfidenceintheirabilitytosingortoteachchildrentosing.Welearntthatpreserviceandprofessionaldevelopmentprogrammescanbesuccessfulinincreasingteachers’confidenceandcompetencetoteachmusic(Heyning,2010;Pascoe,2007;Russell-Bowie,2013;Sinclair,Watkins&Jeanerett,2015).Forexample,skillandconfidencecanbeenhancedwhenteachersareinvolvedinweeklyonehoursingingsessionswithchildren(Heyning;2010),staffsinginggroups(Nyland,Ferris&Deans;2010),andcollaborationwithmentors(Bainger,2010;Jeanerett&Stevens-Ballenger,2013).Ourteamthereforeagreedthatthefourthauthor,(auniversitylecturer,researcher,andmusiceducator)andthefirstauthor,(amusictherapylecturer)wouldfacilitateaworkshopwhichfocusedonparticipatoryvocal/movementactivitiesthatteachersmightbeabletofacilitateinthestudiolearningenvironments.Severalteachersfeltuncomfortableengagingintheexercisesthatwereoffered(asindicatedinquotesbelow),andrejectedtheofferoffurtherprofessionaldevelopmentofthistype.Othersbuiltonitbyattendingateachers’workshopinthecommunitythatthefourthauthorwasfacilitating.Overallhowever,‘directlearning’suchasthatofferedthroughtheworkshop,wasnotassuccessfulinsupportingourteachersastheprocessofdocumenting,examiningandreflectingonthewaysinwhichtheywereengagingchildreninmusicintheclassroom.
Theskilldevelopmentcomeswithenjoymentovertime.Aspartoftheresearchprocesswetriedsomeskill-basedexercisesthattookusbacktochildhoodexperiencesthatsomeofuswerenotreadyfor–weweretransportedtofeelingsthat“youcan’tdothis.”Howeverfromthispointintime–withoutanypressure–teachersdecidedtogivetheirchildrensomedifferentmusicalopportunities.Ateacherfromeachteamwenttoamusiceducationworkshop.Theyenjoyedthatopportunityandittoosowedalittleseedthattheywereabletogoawayandthinkabout.Eventuallyoneteamworkedwithagroupofboysonabodypercussionpiecethattheyperformed;anotheronadrummingpiece;andtheyhavegivenchildrenother‘new’musicalexperiencestoo.Theydidthatbecausethechildrenwerereallyinterestedandmotivated,andthechildrenandteachersalllearnt.Andwhiletheseactivitieswerefun,theywouldalsohavemadeanimportantcontributiontothechildren’smusiceducation.Dianna,individualinterview
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 51
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Action:Facingandchallengingfearsthroughacollaborativeprocessofcriticalreflection.JoandSue’shistoriesprovideconvincingevidencethatearlynegativeinteractionswithotherssignificantlyimpactedontheirsingingconfidence.Theirstoriesreinforcethebeliefthatlackofsingingconfidencecanberelatedtonegativeexperiencesinchildhoodoradolescence;includingpublichumiliationinfrontofclassmates,orbeingaskedtomouththewordsinsteadofsinging(Bainger,2009;Bodkin,1999;Swain&Bodkin-Allen,2014).However,theprocessofcriticallyreflectingontheirexperiencesenabledJoandSuetofaceandtochallengetheirfears.Jorecognisedthatlearnerswouldnotjudgehersingingasshemighthavepreviouslyanticipated.Shewasawarebeforewebeganourresearchthatshedidn’tsinginfrontofthechildren,butbelieveditwasn’taproblem.Theresearchprocesshelpedherre-evaluate.
"(Iwasthinkinginitially)‘don’tchangemyideas.ThisishowIhavetobe’.ButIfeellikeIhaveactuallyowneduptothatandthought,‘Ohactuallyyouareright’".Jo,interview
Asshebegantolookmorecloselyatherroleinfacilitatingsingingforwellbeing,Jobegantounderstandtheimportanceofmodellingwhatsheexpectsfromthechildren.Shehas“steppedoutofhercomfortzone”,to"behavedifferentlytowardthesinging…(andisnow)bouncingandsmilingandthepointingtothewords...inagoodway".Jobegantorecognisethatherloveofmusicanddancefreedhertoengagepassionatelyduringmusicactivitiesandwasdeterminedthatshewouldnotpassherfearofsingingontothechildren.“Ifelt(theresearchwastellingus)thatwecan’tbeagoodteachersofsingingifwefeelfrightenedofsingingourselves,infrontofacrowd.And,andIfeltquiteoffendedbythatattheendofthe(first)year.(But)Ithought‘Hangonaminute,Iloveboppingaround.That’smy'thing',youknow.AndIlovetosinginthecarbymyself.AndI’velearntthroughthisprocesshowtosinginfront(ofothers).AndI’llsinginfrontofthechildren.Jo,focusgroupcontributionAction:Drawingonthesupportofcolleagues.Joalsonoticedthatsomeofhercolleagueswhoalsofeltthey"don'tsingwell"continuedtosingwiththechildren.Thewaysinwhichmoreconfidentteachershavebeenmodelling'courage'andsupportingandmotivatingeachothertoleadandparticipateinsinging,hasincreasedJo’scomfortwithsinging.
Ithoughtworkingasateamwasimportant;because,Iwouldn’thaveenjoyeditasmuch,ifIwasparticipatingonmyowninmyownlittleclassroom.AndIthinkwatchingtheseguys(otherteachers)whoareobviouslymusical,andSueexpressingearlyonthatshewasn’tverycomfortablemademefeelalittlebitbetterthatIwasn’talone.AndthenIwatchedSuesteppingoutofhercomfortzone.AttheendoftheyearwedidaperformancewhichIdon’tthinkwewouldnormallyhavedone…anditwasfantastic.Jo,focusgroupcontribution
Johasbeguntodanceinthestudioswithotherstaff,whilechildrenaresinging,andthinksitisgreatfun.Sheisawarethatwhenchildrenseeteachersenjoyingthemselvestheysinglouderandtheylaughwhiletheyaresinging.Theenjoymentpromoteswellbeing.Joalsobelievedthehighernumberofchildreninlearningstudioenvironments,comparedwith
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 52
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
regularclassrooms,madeasignificantpositivedifferencetoherexperienceoffacilitatingsinging.
“Ifthesingingisnotveryloud,nobodysingsup.It'sjustreallyquiet,which(isn't)actuallythatenjoyable...(Ontheotherhand)theloudertheygettheloudertheygetandtheloudertheyget....Andthesoundof120children...blowsmeaway‘cosIlovetolistentochildrensing".Jo,individualinterview
ItispossiblethatJo’spreferenceforloudnessmighthavebeenrelatedtoherfearofbeingheard,andthe'safety'sheperceiveswhen‘hiding’inabiggroup.Shesuggestedwhenchildrenareinasmallergrouptheymightwanttosing,butfeelunabletobecause"(when)no-oneelseissinging...Ican’t.Ihavetogo".'Havingtogo'or'runningaway'seemstobeametaphorforJo’sfearofmusicandherchildhooddecisionthatshewasnotgoingtodoitanymore.Morerecently,Jotriedtolearnthedrumsfromanotherteacherbutstoppedbecauseshefeltshe"reallywasn'tverygood".
It’saslowprocessbecauseit’smyfeartootogetover.Istillwantthosechildrentosing.Iwouldneversortof,walkaroundasthough(it'snotagoodthing)thatpeoplewillhearyou.I’dneverputthatontochildren.Sodoeshowwefeelabout(our)singingimpactonthesingingandwellbeingofourchildren?Ithinkweplayarole.Ifwearefrightenedofsomethingweensurethatthosechildrenaren’t,youknow.Wetakemoreofadvancedthinkingtomakesurethatthey’renotfeelingthewayIdo....Alotofteachingislikethatisn’tit?You’vegotarolethatyou’replaying”.Jo,individualinterview
Action:Promotingpositiveparticipation.Teacherself-efficacyisdependentonbothconfidenceandcompetence.Teachers’beliefsabouttheircompetence,theirschoolcontext,andthepressurestheyexperiencewithregardtothecurriculum,aswellastheirbeliefsregardingthebenefitsoftheartsforlearners,canbehighlyinfluentialintheirabilitiestoteachmusiceffectively(Garvis&Pendegast,2010).Wehavealreadysuggestedthatwhatteachersbelieveabouttheircapacityforinitiatingandimplementingmusicalideascanunderpinorimpedetheirpotentialtoengageinfurthermusiceducation(Wiggins,2015).However,inourcase,whilesingingconfidenceandconfidencetoteachmusicwaslow,teacherswereextremelyconfidentintheirabilitiestosuccessfullyfacilitatesingingforwell-being,i.e.singingforfun.Thiswascrucial,becauseifanexperienceisperceivedtobesuccessful,self-efficacyisraised,andifitisperceivedtobeafailure,self-efficacyislowered(Garvis,Twigg&Pendegast,2011).Teachersalsostressedtheimportanceofchildrenbelievingtheycanbesuccessfulatsinginginordertogainasenseofachievement,andthemotivationtocontinue.Howevertheysuggested‘success’isaboutchildrenbeingabletoparticipateintheirownway(e.g.listening,moving,aswellasorinsteadofsinging).Theyarguedstronglythat‘technicalmusiclearning’wasnotappropriateinthecontextofsingingforwell-being;andthatsingingforwell-beingshouldnotbe‘taught’;ratheritshouldjustbe“purespontaneousenjoyment”(Rickson,Legg&Reynolds,2018).Thiswasimportantbecauseitcontributedtoagrowingbodyofknowledgethatsuggestswhenaimingforpsychosocialwell-being
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 53
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
benefits,activitiesthatfocusonexpressionandfunshouldbeencouragedtoenablelearnerstoexperiencemusicasengaging,enjoyableandusefulintermsofcommunicatingfeelings(Crooke&McFerran,2014).Ontheotherhandwealsoconcludedthatbyfocusingonpositiveparticipationratherthanskill-basedlearning,thepotentialexistsforsingingintheclassroomtocontributepositivelytobotheducationandwell-beingagendas(Rickson,Legg&Reynolds,2018),andthedevelopmentoflifelongmusicallearning(Higgins,2015).
IwasinachoirallthewaythroughprimaryschoolbutIactuallydon’tthinkofmyselfasaverygoodsinger.Idon’tthinkIsingintune,butthatdoesn’tstopmesingingbecauseIabsolutelyloveit!AndIdon’tthinkthat’sabadthing,infrontofthekids,ifyoucan’tsingthatwellthenit’salwaysgoodtoshowthat.Carmen,focusgroupcontribution
Thesinginghasofferedopportunitiesforallkidstobeinvolvedasactiveparticipants,themusicwedidattheendoflastyearwassimilarlygivingthosekidsago–thosewhomightnotnormallybeperceivedasbeingmusical,andgivingthemapurpose,makingitfun.Andthoughweweren’tteachingthemnotationandthosesortsofthings,Iwasusingmusicaltermslike4/4andtheywerelearningrhythmsandbeatssotheywerestilllearningthoseconceptsinafun,purposefulway.Matt,focusgroupcontribution
(Theresearchprocess)hasgrownmyappreciationofthemusicthatthekidsareinvolvedwith.…Toseetheenjoymentthey’vegotfromsomeofthoseoldersongs,andtheengagement,whereaswewouldbeinclinedtogowithwhatthekidschoosethinkingthatthat’swhat’sgoingtogivethemthemostenjoyment.Butit’snotactuallybeenthatwayandit’sbroadenedtheirmusicalappreciationaswell.…Whathelpedwasknowingtheprocessthattheywouldbegoingthrough,andthefeelingsthattheywouldgothrough.Soweworkedthroughthosethingsaswebecamemoreconfident.Sue,focusgroupcontribution
Ourexperiencesofhavingconversationsaroundsingingforwellbeing–justthepureenjoymentofit–gotmixedupwiththinkingthatmusiceducationiscompletelydifferent.Butweknowwecanenjoysingalongsandstilltakeopportunitiestoincreaseourenjoymentandwellbeingbytakingthesingingtoanotherlevelwithnewsongsthatwemightnotalwayssing,orwithaddingharmoniesandsoon.Wedon’tneedtojudgepeoplewhodon’tgotothatnextlevel,buttakingthoseopportunitiescanenhancethepositiveresponsesthatsingingcanevoke.Itmightbethedifferencebetweenhappinessand‘goosebumps’forexample.Dianna,individualinterview
Reflection:Understandingtheactionresearchprocess.Theemphasisourteachersputontakinga‘non-judgemental’and‘non-pressurizing’approachtosingingforwell-beingmightalsoberelatedtotheirpersonalexperiencesoffeelingpressurizedtosing,and/orbeingjudgedtobeinadequate.Peoplewholabelthemselves‘non-singers’areanxiousabout
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 54
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
singing,oftenresistitinfearofbeingjudged(Abril,2007;Ruddock&Leong,2005;Sloboda,2005).Moreover,Joarguedthatpeoplehavehighexpectationsofteachersgenerally;theyarealwaysbeing'judged',andjudgedontheperformanceofothers,and“cannotputatoeoutofline”.Sheistherefore“alwaysworriedaboutwhether(she)isgoodenough”.However,theactionresearchprocessenabledindividualteachersinourstudynotonlytograduallyunderstandvariousaspectsoftheirfacilitationofsinging,includingthewaysinwhichtheirhistorieshaveimpactedontheirrelationshipwithsinging,butalsotomakecontinuousprogressindevelopingtheirstrengthsasreflectivepractitioners.
Theactionresearchhasbeenenjoyableoverall,becauseithasallowedustohavethinkingtime,toheareachother’sstories,andtohearteachers’learning.Ithaspromptedpeopletosharepersonalexperiences,earlyexperiences,notjusttheirownexperiencesofteachingmusic.Andsomeofourconversationshavebeendifficult.Butwewereabletouncoversomelongheldbeliefsthatteacherswerecarryingaboutmusic,andthiswasimportant….ItwashelpfultoreflectonsomeofmyownmusicexperiencesatschoolandtorealisewhyIholdsomeofthebeliefsthatInowdonow.Forexample,InevergotintothechoirsathighschoolbecauseIwas‘nevergoodenough’,butIwantchildrentobeabletohavethatexperiencenow,soImakesurethatanyonecancomeandsingatchoir.Dianna,individualinterview
Josuggeststheactionresearchprocessenabledhertosingwithherlearnersbytakingacognitiveapproach(tellingherselfitwaspartofherprofessionalroletodothis),acknowledgingherloveofmusic,anddrawingonthesupport(particularlymodelling)ofcolleagues.Allmembersoftheschoolcommunitywerealreadyworkingtogethertoachieveacommonpurposeandteachershaddevelopedastrongcultureofcollaboration(Fullan,1999).Ourteachers’sharedcommunicationandreflectionontheirexperiencesenabledthemtosafelychallengetheirbeliefs,togainfurtherself-understanding,andtotakesmallstepstowardsimprovingtheirsingingconfidence,byallowingthemtoestablishalearningcommunityspecificallytoexaminetheirdailysingingpractices.
Whenwebeganouractionresearch,wewouldhavebeenmakingassumptionsaboutwhatteammemberswerethinkingandfeeling.Webegansingingbrainbreakswithaneurologicalfocus;knowingthatsingingwouldbesomethingthatwouldstimulateotherareasofthebrainandhelpchildrentobereadyforlearning.That’swhywedidwhatwedid.Theteamscameonboardbecausetheywereinterestedinthesinging,theycouldseethepositivebenefitsthatsinginghadforthechildren–butwithoutrealisinghowmuchself-reflectiontheywouldendupdoingthemselves.Duringthisprocess,wehavelookednotonlyathowwefacilitatethesinging,orteachmusic,butalsoatourselves–andthisismorethanwewouldhaveanticipatedwhenwestartedonthisjourney.Theactionresearchprocesshelpedustochange.Dianna,individualinterview
Changetakestimetoberealized,andworksbestwhenitisnotimposed(Makoelle,2014).Ourteachersalreadyhadsubstantialchangeimposedonthemasaresultofsignificantandtraumaticevents,andwewereawarethatwewereworkinginasensitivesettingwhich
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 55
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
demandedwetakecarenotcauseunnecessarydistress(Dickson-Swiftetal.,2008;Liamputtong&Ezzy,2005;Mutch,2015).Itwascrucialthattheybeallowedtothinkontheirownaboutchangeratherthanhavingchangeimposedonthem(Richardsetal.2001).AsJosuggest,“peopleneedgentleencouragementandsupportinordertoengagewithmusicintheirowntimeandattheirownpace”.Actionresearchdoesnotalwaysleadtodramaticchangesinpractice,orevenmakeasignificantcontributiontoabodyofknowledge.Rather,individualpracticesandpractitionersarechangedasparticipantsengageininquiryinwhichconnectionsaremade–throughcriticalreflection–betweenpersonalexperiences,theoryandtheirprofessionalpractice.Reflectingdeeplyissomethingteachersrarelyhaveregulartimefor.
Theactionresearchmadeusdoit.Wemighthaveslackenedoff-(Anotherteachercutsin:“Wehadtothinkaboutitmore”)-Yes,wehadtothinkaboutitmorebecausewewerepartofsomethingthatwasbiggerthanus,wedon’tlikelettingpeopledownsoweputourbestfootforward.Soitmadeusthinklaterallytoo.Sue,focusgroupcontribution
Bythinkingandlearningabouttheirclassroomsingingpractices,andthebeliefsandvaluesthatunderpinthem,ourteachersmayhavebecomemoreconfidentintheirabilitytoputtheoryintopracticeacrossawiderrangeofcurriculumactivities.Theyhavebeenchallengedtoexaminetheirownbeliefsandvalues,havebecomemorereflective,analytical,andcritical,andwillbeabletoexpandtheirknowledgeandskillsasresearchersandasempoweredprofessionalswhocanself-monitormoreeffectively,inanongoingway.
Teachersdonotwanttostagnate,wedon’twanttostandstill;wewanttochallengeourselvesallthetime.Butwe’vebeenthroughagreatdealofchangeatWaitākiriSchoolbothbeforeandduringtheperiodofthisresearch–includingdevelopingourcollaborativeteachingandlearningapproach.Someofthechangehasbeenexternallyimposed,andsomeofitwasinternallyimposed,aswellasteachersengaginginself-challenge.Makingandmaintainingpositiveconnectionswithothersinourschoolcommunityhasbeenextremelyimportant.Theresearchenabledustoconnectwiththosearoundusbecausewewereallsingingandworkingontheactionresearchtogether.Dianna,individualinterview
Conclusion
Thissinglecasestudyfocusesonaschoolwhereteacherschosetoengagelearnersindailysingingtosupporttheirwell-beinginatraumaticpost-earthquakeenvironment.Whilereflectingonthework,severalteachersrecognisedthattheywerepassionateaboutengagingchildreninsingingyetwereuncomfortablesingingthemselves.Anactionresearchprocessgavethemtimeandspacetoreflectontheirpersonalhistories,toconsiderhowtheirmusicalconfidencehadbeenaffectedbythenegativejudgementsofothers,andtorecognisethattheirexperienceswerenotunique.Inthiswaytheirexperiencesandfeelingswerevalidated.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 56
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Thesuccessofteacherprofessionaldevelopmentdependsnotonlyontheirabilitytoreflectonanddeveloptheirconceptualizationsofknowledge,learningandteachingpractices(Thorn&Brasche,2015)butalsoontheirwillingnesstochallengeproblematicbeliefsanddevelopnewunderstandings(Nyberg,2015).Nyberggoesontosaythatresearchonprofessionaldevelopmentwithinartseducationhasfoundthatpractitionersarereluctanttoimplementchangesuggestednotonlybyauthoritiesandpolicymakersbutalsobypractitioners;andthatthoughtpatterns,aswellasbehaviour,needstochange(Neyberg,2015).However,examiningandreconstructingpersonalbeliefscanbeintellectuallyandemotionallydemanding.TeachersparticipatingintheSingingforWellbeingprojectdescribedjourneysoflistening,rebelling,gainingself-acceptanceandacceptancefromothers;andofwatching,listening,gainingconfidence,participating,increasingconfidenceandparticipatingfurther.Thustheydeemedtheworkworthwhile.
Thekeytoworthwhileteacher-conductedactionresearchrestsinthequestionsaddressedbytheprojectandtheextenttowhichtheresultsaremeaningfulandimportanttotheteachers-andnotnecessarilyinthemeansbywhichthoseresultsarerealized(Mertler,2010).Inourcasetheresearchprocesshelpedteachersgainadeepersenseofempathywithothersintheschoolcommunity,andtheywereabletousethisempathytosupportlearners.Theyfeltthattheresearchprocesssupportedtheireffortstocollaborateasthosewhoweremoreconfidentorcompetentwithparticularaspectsoftheprojectwereabletomodelandsupportothers;i.e.theylearntfromeachother.Mostimportantly,theircloseobservationsofchildrenlefttheminspiredbythewaysinwhichthelearnersmanagedthemselvesinextremelydifficultcircumstances,andhowsinging,alongwithphysicalmovementandhumour,appearedtosupporttheirwell-being.Wehaveincludedavideoputtogetherbylearnersandteacherswhichbringstogetherthesethreefactorsanddemonstrateshowtheysupportedwell-beinginourcommunity(https://youtu.be/GkOr7xq36EM).
Despitetheirlowself-efficacywithregardtosingingandteachingmusic,ourteacherswereabletoensurethatsingingprogrammesremainedaccessibleandenjoyable–and‘successful’inthewell-beingcontext.Ourfindingssuggestthatevenwithpoorself-efficacy,teachersareabletoengagelearnersinsingingbytakingthefocusawayfrommusiclearning.SimilarlyearlychildhoodteachersinSwain&Bodkin-Allen’s(2014)studywholackedconfidenceandconsideredthemselves‘tonedeaf’andunmusical,alsoreportedenjoyingorevenlovingsinging,andwerewillingtoparticipateinsingingactivities.However,whileourfindingssuggestthatunpackingnegativeexperiencescanbealmostasimportantinsomecasesasacquiringknowledgeandskillsinmusic(Bainger,2010)wewouldalsoarguethatmoreneedstobedonetoensurethatteachers–andindeedallpeople-areabletobeconfidentinusingtheirvoicestosing.
“Journeyingonawiderpathallowsustomovewithamorediversegroupoffellowtravellerswhoshapeourjourneyandwidenourperspectives”.
(Chapman,2015,p.27)
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 57
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Acknowledgements:
ThisresearchwasfundedbytheNewZealandGovernmentTeachingandLearningInitiative(TLRI).TheauthorsgratefullyacknowledgetheTLRI;theWaitākiriSchoolcommunity,particularlystaffandlearnersinKorimakoandTravisstudios;andProfessorKatrinaMcFerran,MelbourneConservatoriumofMusic,TheUniversityofMelbourne,forherhelpfulmentoringofthisproject.
AbouttheAuthors
DaphneRickson,Ph.D.,isaSeniorLecturerinmusictherapyattheNewZealandSchoolofMusic-TeKōkī,VictoriaUniversityofWellington.Asamusictherapypractitionershehasovertwentyyearsofexperienceworkingwithlearnerswhohavediverseneeds,inarangeofspecialschoolsandmainstreamsettings.Shehasparticularinterestandexperienceintheuseofcollaborativeresearchapproaches,includingparticipatoryactionresearch.Email:[email protected].
JoAtkinsonisanexperiencedclassroomteacher,andcurrentlyTeamLeader(KorimakoHub,Year5-6)atMarshlandSchool.Email:[email protected].
DiannaReynoldsisanexperiencedclassroomteacher,musicspecialist,andcurrentDeputyPrincipalatWaitākiriSchool.Email:[email protected].
RobertLegg,Ed.D.,studiedmusicandeducationatBristol,OxfordandDurhamuniversitiesintheUnitedKingdom,andatMcGillUniversityinCanada.Heplaysthecelloandthepiano,andisactiveasateacher,researcher,conductorandaccompanist.Hiswidelyperformedarrangementsandaward-winningoriginalcompositionsincludepart-songs,dramaticcantatasandcarols,aswellasmusicfororchestraandstringensembles.RoberthasworkedextensivelyinschoolsanduniversitiesinEngland,NewZealandandFrance.HisacademicwritingappearsinjournalssuchasMusicEducationResearch,PsychologyofMusic,ResearchinEducationandTheCurriculumJournalwhilehisbookchapters,journalismandreviewscanbefoundinmanyprofessionalperiodicals.Email:[email protected].
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 58
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ReferencesAbril,C.R.(2007)Ihaveavoice,butIjustcan’tsing:anarrativeinvestigationofsingingandsocialanxiety. MusicEducationResearch,9,1–15.Bainger,L.(2009).Howearlychildhoodteacherscandevelopconfidenceindoingmusic.InA.Power(Ed.), ProceedingsoftheJointConferenceofXXXIstANZARMEAnnualConferenceandtheIstConferenceof theMusicEducatorsResearchCenter(MERC)(pp.9–20).Melbourne,Australia:ANZARME.Bainger,L.(2010).Amusiccollaborationwithearlychildhoodteachers.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation. Vol2,pp.17-27Barrett,M.S.(2005).Musicalcommunicationandchildren’scommunitiesofmusicalpractice.InD.Miell,R. MacDonald&D.Hargreaves(Eds.),Musicalcommunication(pp.261–280).Oxford,UK:Oxford UniversityPress.Bodkin,S.(1999).Fromthepersonaltotheprofessional:Teachers’ownexperiencesofmusicandhowtheyI nfluencetheirclassroompractices.InM.S.Barrett,G.E.McPherson,&S.Smith(Eds.),Proceedings ChildrenandMusic:DevelopmentalPerspectivesInternationalMusicEducationResearchSymposium (pp.84–87).Launceston,Australia:UniversityofTasmania.Bodkin-Allen,S.(2009).Beingmusical.Teachers,music,andidentityinearlychildhoodeducationin Aotearoa/NewZealand.Deutschland,KG:LambertAcademicPublishing.Braun,V.,&Clarke,V.(2013).Successfulqualitativeresearch:Apracticalguideforbeginners.London:Sage. Burnard,P.(2013).Teachingmusiccreatively.InP.Burnard,A.Ruthmann,J.Biddulph,J.Wheeler,R. Murphy,M.Regina,K.Upitis,&B.Rena(Eds.),Teachingmusiccreatively.NewYork:Routledge.Campbell,P.S.(2010).Songsintheirheads:Musicanditsmeaninginchildren'slives(2nded.).NewYork: OxfordUniversityPress.Cardno,C.(2003).ActionResearch:ADevelopmentalApproach.Wellington:NewZealandCouncilfor EducationalResearch.Cordeiro,L.,Soares,C.B.,&Rittenmeyer,L.(2017).Unscramblingmethodandmethodologyinactionresearch traditions:theoreticalconceptualizationofpraxisandemancipation.QualitativeResearch,17(4),395– 407.https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116674771Crooke,A.H.D.,&McFerran,K.S.(2014).Recommendationsfortheinvestigationanddeliveryofmusic programsaimedatachievingpsychosocialwellbeingbenefitsinmainstreamschools.Australian JournalofMusicEducation,1,15-37.Davidson,J.W.(2011).Musicalparticipation:Expectations,experiences,andoutcomes.InI.Deliege&J.W. Davidson(Eds.),Musicandthemind:EssaysinhonourofJohnSloboda(pp.65-87).Oxford:Oxford UniversityPress.Dickson-Swift,V.,James,E.L.,&Liamputtong,P.(2008).Undertakingsensitiveresearchinthehealthandsocial sciences:managingboundaries,emotionsandrisks.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPressDrummond,J.(2012).Aninternationalperspectiveonmusiceducationforadults.InG.E.McPherson&G.F. Welch(Eds.),TheOxfordHandbookofMusicEducation(Vol.2).NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.Fullan,M.(1999).Oneffectingchangeinartseducation.ArtsEducationPolicyReview,100(3),17-18.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 59
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Garvis,S.&Lemon,N.(2013).AretheArtsimportantinschooling?Clearmessagesfromthevoicesofpre- servicegeneralistteachersinAustralia.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation.Vol2,98-104Garvis,S.&Pendegast,D.(2010).Middleyearsteachers’pastexperiencesofthearts”Implicationsforteacher education.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation.Vol2,pp.28-40Garvis,S.,Twigg,D.,Pendegast,D.(2011).Breakingthenegativecycle.Theformationofself-efficacybeliefsin thearts.Afocusonprofessionalexperienceinpre-serviceteachereducation.AustralasianJournalof EarlyChildhood.36(2)pp.36-41Gembris,H.(2012).Chapter25:Music-makingasalifelongdevelopmentandresourceforhealth.InR.A. MacDonald,G.Kreutz,&L.Mitchell(Eds.),Music,health,andwellbeing.Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press.Goldberg,M.(2012).Artsintegration:Teachingsubjectmatterthroughtheartsinmulticulturalsettings(4th ed.).Boston,MA:Pearson/AllynandBacon.Grape,C.,Sandgren,M.,Hansson,L.-O.,Ericson,M.,&Theorell,T.(2003).Doessingingpromotewell-being? Anempiricalstudyofprofessionalandamateursingersduringasinginglesson.Integrative PhysiologicalandBehavioralScience,3865-74.Hargreaves,D.J.,Lamont,A.,Marshall,N.,Tarrant,M.(2003)YoungPeople’sMusicInandOutofSchool:A StudyofPupilsandTeachersinPrimaryandSecondarySchools.London:QualificationsandCurriculum AuthorityResearchReport.Hesse-Biber,S.N.,&Leavy,P.(2010).Thepracticeofqualitativeresearch,2ndedition.ThousandOaks, CA:Sage.Heyning,L.(2010).Theenhancementofmusicalandotherlearningforbothteachersandstudentsthrougha weeklychoirsession.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation.Vol1,pp58-70.Heyning,L.(2011)."Ican'tsing!"Theconceptofteacherconfidenceinsingingandtheusewithintheirclassroom.InternationalJournalofEducationandtheArts,12(13),Onlineathttp://www.ijea.org/.Higgins,L.(2015).Myvoiceisimportanttoo:Non-formalmusicexperiencesandyoungpeople.InG.E. McPherson(Ed.),TheChildasMusician:Ahandbookofmusicaldevelopment:OxfordScholarship Online.Hine,G.S.,&Lavery,S.D.(2014).Actionresearch:Informingprofessionalpracticewithinschools.Issuesin EducationalResearch,24(2),2014.Hinshaw,T.,Clift,S.,Hulbert,S.,&Camic,P.M.(2015).Groupsingingandyoungpeople'spsychologicalwell- being.InternationalJournalofMentalHealthPromotion,17(1),46-63. doi:10.1080/14623730.2014.999454Hylton,J.B.(1981).Dimensionalityinhighschoolstudentparticipants’perceptionsofthemeaningofchoral singingexperience.JournalofResearchinMusicEducation,29,287-296.Ilari,B.,Chen-Hafteck,L.,&Crawford,L.(2013).Singingandculturalunderstanding:Amusiceducation perspective.InternationalJournalofMusicEducation,31,202-216.Jeanerette,N.&Stevens-Ballenger,J.(2013).Thegeneralistandthespecialist:serendipityinpreservice education.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation.Vol1,64-75
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 60
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Joseph,D.&Trinnick,R.(2016).PromotingculturalunderstandingsthroughsongacrosstheTasman:pre- serviceprimaryteachereducation.InterculturalEducation.27(2),201-215.Kemmis,S.,McTaggart,R.,&Nixon,R.(2014).Theactionresearchplanner:Doingcriticalparticipatoryaction research.Singapore:Springer.Kirschner,&Tomasello.(2010).Jointmusicmakingpromotesprosocialbehaviorin4-year-oldchildren. EvolutionandHumanBehavior,31(5),354-364.Kirsh,E.,vanLeer,E.,Phero,H.,Xie,C.,&Khosla,S.(2013).Factorsassociatedwithsingers'perceptionsof choralsingingwell-being.JournalofVoice,27(6),786.Lamont,A.2011.Thebeatgoeson:Musiceducation,identityandlifelonglearning.MusicEducationResearch, 13,369-388.Lamont,A.,Daubney,A.,Spruce,G.(2012).Singinginprimaryschools:Casestudiesofgoodpracticeinwhole classvocaltuition.BritishJournalofMusicEducation,29,261-268.Liamputtong,P.(2011).Focusgroupmethodology:Principlesandpractice.London,:SAGEPublicationsLtddoi: 10.4135/9781473957657.Liamputtong,P.,&Ezzy,D.(2005).Qualitativeresearchmethods(2nded.).SouthMelbourne,Vic.;NewYork: OxfordUniversityPress.Makoelle,T.M.(2014).Inclusionandexclusion.Ruralteachersandlearners'experiences:Casesinthefree-s tateprovince.Anthropologist,18(3),1097-1104.Marsh,K.(2009).Themusicalplayground:Globaltraditionandchangeinchildren'ssongsandgames.UK: OxfordScholarshipOnline.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308983.001.0001Mertler,C.A.(2010).ActionResearch:Improvingschoolsandempoweringeducators.KindleEdition:SAGE Publications.Mutch,C.(2015).Quietheroes:TeachersandtheCanterbury,NewZealand,earthquakes.AustralasianJournal ofDisasterandTraumaStudies,19(2).McNiff,J.(1988).ActionResearch:PrinciplesandPractice.Hampshire:McMillanEducationLtd.Mikkelsen,E.N.2013.“AResearcher’sTale:HowDoingConflictResearchShapesResearchaboutConflict.” QualitativeResearchinOrganizationsandManagement:AnInternationalJournal8(1):33–49. doi:10.1108/17465641311327504.Nyanjom,J.(2018).Cycleswithincycles:instillingstructureintoamentoringself-studyactionresearchproject, EducationalActionResearch,26:4,626-640,DOI:10.1080/09650792.2017.1386116Nyberg,J.(2015).Youareseldombornwithadrumkitinyourhands:Musicteachers'conceptualisationsof knowledgeandlearningwithinmusiceducationasanassessmentpractice.SystematicPracticein ActionResearch,29,235-259.doi:10.1007/s11213-015-9362-3Nyland,B.,Ferris,J.,&Deans,J.(2010).Youngchildrenandmusic:Adultsconstructingmeaningthrougha performanceforchildren.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation.Vol2,pp.5-16.Pascoe.R.(2007).Harmonisingorhomogenisingartsandeducation?PerspectivesontheartsinAustralian schoolsoutsideinandinsideout.JournalofArtisticandCreativeEducation,1(1),255.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 61
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Pitts,S.E.(2015).Fosteringlifelongengagementinmusic.InG.E.McPherson(Ed.),TheChildasMusician:A handbookofmusicaldevelopment(2nded.).Oxford,UK:OxfordUniversityPress.Power,A.2014.MusiceducationresearchinAustralia2012-14.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation,2,184- 195.RichardsJC,GalloPB,RenandyaWA2001.Exploringteachers’beliefsandtheprocessofchange.PACJournal, 1(1):41–48.Rickard,N.S.,Bambrick,C.J.,&Anneliese,G.(2012).Absenceofwidespreadpsychosocialandcognitive effectsofschool-basedmusicinstructionin10-13-year-oldstudents.InternationalJournalofMusic Education,30(1),57-78.Rickson,D.,Legg,R.,&Reynolds,D.(2018).Dailysinginginaschoolseverelyaffectedbyearthquakes: Potentiallycontributingtobothwellbeingandmusiceducationagendas?NewZealandJournalof Teachers'Work,15(1),63-84.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v15i1.243Rickson,D.,Reynolds,D.,&Legg,R.(2018).Learners’perceptionsofdailysinginginaschoolcommunity severelyaffectedbyearthquakes:Linkstosubjectivewellbeing.JournalofAppliedArtsandHealth, 9(3),367-384.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jaah.9.3.367_1Ruddock,E.(2012)."Sortofinyourblood":Inherentmusicalitysurvivesculturaljudgement.ResearchStudies inMusicEducation,34(2),207-221.Ruddock,E.,Leong,S.(2005).‘Iamunmusical!’:Theverdictofself-judgement.InternationalJournalofMusic Education,23,9–22.Russell-Bowie,D.(2009).Whatme?Teachmusictomyprimaryclass?Challengestoteachingmusicinprimary schoolsinfivecountries.MusicEducationResearch,11(1),23-36.Russell-Bowie,D.(2013).Missionimpossibleorpossiblemission?Changingconfidenceandattitudesof primarypreservicemusiceducationstudentsusingKolb’sexperientiallearningtheory.Australian JournalofMusicEducation.Vol2,pp.46-63.Russell-Bowie,D.,&Dowson,M.(2005).Effectsofbackgroundandsexonconfidenceinteachingthecreative arts:Testsofspecifichypotheses.PaperpresentedattheAustralianAssociationforResearchin Education,Sydney,2005.Sagor,R.(2000).GuidingSchoolImprovementwithActionResearch:AssociationforSupervisionand CurriculumDevelopment.Sinclair,C.,Watkins,M.,&Jeanerett,N.(2015).Mentoringteachersasartistsincommunitiesofpractice: immersivemodelsofprofessionallearninginthearts.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation,Vol3, pp.73-83.Sloboda,J.(2005).Exploringthemusicalmind:Cognition,Emotion,Ability,Function.Oxford:OxfordUniversity Press.Sloboda,J.A.,Wise,K.J.,&Peretz,I.(2005).Quantifyingtonedeafnessinthegeneralpopulation.Annalsof theNewYorkAcademyofSciences,1060(1),255–261.Sutherland,A.(2015)."3:36pm,than'swhenallthefunstarts":Formingmusicalidentitythroughsecondary schoolmusic.AustralianJournalofMusicEducation,2,162-`175.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 62
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Swain,N.,&Bodkin-Allen,S.(2014).Can'tsing?Won'tsing?Aotearoa/NewZealand'tone-deaf'early childhoodteachers'musicalbeliefs.BritishJournalofMusicEducation,31(3),245-263. doi:10.1017/S0265051714000278Swain,N.,&Bodkin-Allen,S.(2017).Developingsingingconfidenceinearlychildhoodteachersusing acceptanceandcommitmenttherapyandgroupsinging:Arandomizedtrial.ResearchStudiesin MusicEducation,39(1),109-120.Thorn,B.,&Brasche,I.(2015).Musicalexperienceandconfidenceofpre-serviceprimaryteachers.Australian JournalofMusicEducation,2,191-203.Tosun,T.(2000).Thebeliefsofpre-serviceelementaryteacherstowardscienceandscienceteaching.School ScienceandMathematics,100,374-379.Trevarthen,C.(2002).OriginsofMusicalIdentity.InR.A.R.MacDonald,D.J.Hargreaves,&D.Miell(Eds.), MusicalIdentities.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.Welch,G.(2005).Singingandvocaldevelopment.InG.McPherson(Ed),Thechildasmusician(pp.312–339). Oxford,UK:OxfordUniversityPress.West,S.(2009).Selectivemutismforsinging(SMS)anditstreatment:conceptualisingmusicaldisengagement asmasssocialdysfunction.InW.Baker(Ed.),MusicalUnderstanding:ProceedingsoftheXVIINational Conference(pp.212–219).Launceston,Australia:AustralianSocietyforMusicEducation.Whidden,C.(2008).Theinjusticeofsinger/non-singerlabelsbymusiceducators.Gender,Education,Music, andSociety,5,1015.Wiggins,J.(2007).Compositionalprocessinmusic.InL.Bresler(Ed.),Internationalhandbookofresearchin artseducation(pp.453–70).Amsterdam,TheNetherlands:Springer. Wiggins,J.(2015).Musicalagency.InG.E.McPherson(Ed.),Thechildasmusician:Ahandbookofmusical development.UK:OxfordScholarshipOnline.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744443.003.0006
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 63
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
USINGFIRSTAUTHOR©WRITINGCURRICULUMWITHSTUDENTSWITHAUTISMSPECTRUMDISORDERKristieAsaro-Saddler
UniversityofAlbany
JessicaColes
UniversityofAlbany
AbstractForindividualswithautismspectrumdisorder(ASD),writingcanpotentiallyaidinincreasedcommunication,socialization,andindependence.Yetthesestudentshistoricallyhavebeenexcludedfrompurposefulwritingactivitiesandinsteadhavereceivedlimitedliteracylearninginstruction.Inthisactionresearchproject,weobservedtheeffectsofahigh-qualitywritingcurriculumonthreeyoungstudentswithASD.Weutilizedaqualitativecasestudydesigntoanswerthefollowingquestion:WhataretheeffectsoftheFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumandtechnologyprogramonthewritingandengagementofelementaryschoolstudentswithASD?ResultsindicatedthatallthreestudentsappearedtobenefitfromtheuseoftheFirstAuthor®.Theteacheralsoreportedfeelingmoreconfidentandpreparedtoteachwritingtoherstudents.Generalthemesincludedincreasedstudentengagement,willingnesstotransition,andincreasedqualityinteractionwithtechnologyandwithotherstudents/adults.Practicalimplications,limitations,andfutureresearchdirectionwillbeprovided.
Keywords:teacheractionresearch,autismspectrumdisorder,engagement,technology,writing
Introduction
Writingisameansofexpression,personalreflection,andself-discovery(Kluth&Chandler-Olcott,2008).Writingisoftenusedbothinandoutoftheschoolsettingasamethodofdemonstratingone’sunderstandingofcontent,sharingideas,andcommunicatingwithothers.Inthecurrentageoftextmessages,emailcommunications,andsocialmedia,studentsneedtobeawareofandabletousedifferentformsofwrittencommunication.Yetwritingoftenposesasachallengetomanyindividualswithandwithoutdisabilities;amongpeoplewhofacethesechallengesarethosewithautismspectrumdisorder(ASD).
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 64
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ForindividualswithASD,writingisespeciallyimportantbecauseitcanaidinincreasedcommunication,socialization,andindependence(Wollak&Koppenhaver,2011).AlthoughsomepeoplewithASDareskilledwriterswhoeffectivelyusewritingasameansofcommunicationandexpression,manystudentswithASDstruggletowritewell.SpecificcharacteristicsofstudentswithASDmayinterferewiththeirabilitytoengageinthewritingprocess.Theseincludelanguagedelaysthatimpacttheirabilitytoproducewrittenproducts(Sturm,2012),difficultyutilizingwritingstrategiessuchasplanning,organizingandgeneratingcontent(Joseph&Konrad,2009),lackofself-regulation(Asaro-Saddler&Saddler,2010)andexecutivefunctioningskills(Carnahan,Williamson,&Christman,2011)requiredforwriting,andphysicaland/orsensoryimpairmentsthatmayimpacttheirabilitytoproducewrittenproducts(Wollak&Koppenhaver,2011).Thesecharacteristics,coupledwiththefactthatindividualswithASDoftenreceiveinadequateliteracyinstruction(Joseph&Konrad,2009),resultsintheirtendencytoperformwellbelowtheirpeersintheareaofwriting(Bishop,Sawyer,Alber-Morgan,&Boggs,2015).
LiteratureReview
Historically,studentswithASDhavebeenexcludedfrompurposefulwritingactivities(Carnahan,Williamson,Hollingshead,&Israel,2012)andinsteadhavereceivedlimitedliteracylearninginstruction,oftenfocusedonfunctionalskillssuchascopyingwordsandsentences,worksheets,andhandwritingdrill-and-practice(Asaro-Saddler,Arcidiacono,&Morris-Deyoe,2017;Sturm,2012).Thismayoccurforseveralreasons.First,manyeducatorscontinuetobelievethatalife-skills,functionalperspectiveismostappropriateforstudentswithASD(Ruppar,2015;Ruppar,Dymond,&Gaffney,2011)andthatwritinginstructionissuperfluous.Infact,oneofthegreatestbarrierstowritingforstudentswithASDisthattheirteachersdonotbelievetheyarecapableofbecomingwriters(Keefe&Copeland,2011;Sturm,2012).Inaddition,educatorsoftenlacktraininginhowtoprovideevidence-basedwritinginstruction(e.g.,Cutler&Graham,2008).Evenwithtraining,teachersoftendonothaveappropriatecurricularguides,appropriatewritingtools,andtimeallocatedinthedaytoprovideinstruction(Sturm,2012;Sturm,Cali,Nelson,&Staskowski,2012).Unfortunately,thisresultsinstudentswithASDlearningtowriteindecontextualizedenvironments,ratherthanthroughauthenticusesofliteracyskillsineverydayactivities(Ruppar,2015),anddoesnotallowthemtoreceivethesupportordeveloptheappropriateskillstheyneedtobecomeproficientwriters.
Researchhasfound,however,thatwhenprovidedwitheffective,evidence-basedinstruction,studentswithASDcandevelophigher-levelwritingskills.Forexample,areviewoftheliteraturewasconductedtoexploretheeffectivenessofwritinginterventionswithstudentswithASD(Pennington&Delano,2012),andfoundseveralpotentiallyeffectivewritinginterventions.Amongtheseistheself-regulatedstrategydevelopment(SRSD),anapproachthatcombinesstrategyinstructionwithpromptsforself-regulationsuchasgoalsettingandself-monitoring.StudiesusingthisinterventionfoundpositivefindingsinthepersuasivewritingandstorywritingofelementaryschoolstudentswithASD(seeAsaro-Saddler,2016forareview).OtherstudieshavehighlightedtheuseoftechnologyforstudentswithASDtowritestories(e.g.,Pennington,Collins,Stenhoff,Turner&Gunselman,
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 65
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
2014;Schneider,Codding,&Tryon,2013),namewriting(Moore,Anderson,Treccase,Deppeler,Furlonger,&Didden,2013),andcheckthespellingofwords(e.g.,Kagohara,Sigafoos,Achmadi,O’Reilly,&Lancioni,2012).
OnetechnologyprogramthathasrecentlybeenexploredwithstudentswithASDisFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumandtechnologyprogram.ThisprogramwasdevelopedbyDr.JanetSturmspecificallyforbeginningwriterswithcomplexlearningneedssuchasASDanddesignedinconsiderationofUniversalDesignforLearning(UDL)principles(Sturm,2015).Itguidesstudentsthroughathree-stepwritingprocessofchoosingatopic,selectingapictureprompt,andwritingwiththesupportofbuilt-inaccommodationssuchaswordbanks,on-screenkeyboards,andself-regulationprompts.Mini-lessons,whichoccurforabout5-15minutes,focusononespecificskillfortheday(e.g.,addingaperiod)andaretaughtthroughexplicitinstruction(Sturm,2015).Lessonsincludeatipsheetconsistingofbothsimplewordsandpicturestohelpstudentsremembertheessentialinformation.Writingtimefollowsthemini-lesson,andthenstudentsaregiventheopportunitytosharetheirworkintheAuthor’sChair.Inonepilotstudy,preliminaryanalysesfoundthatsecondarystudentswithASDanddevelopmentaldisabilitieswhousedFirstAuthor®reportedmixedresults,indicatingthatstudentsshowedsomeimprovementsinwritingqualityandquantitywhenbeingtaughtusingFirstAuthor®(Asaro-Saddler,Muir-Knox,Meredith,&Akhmedjanova,2015).However,noknownpublishedstudyhasexploredtheeffectsoftheprogramonyoungbeginningwriters.
Methodology
ContextfortheCurrentStudy.Thefirstauthor,aspecialeducationteacheranddoctoralstudent,wantedtoprovideherstudentswithqualitywritinginstructioninwhichtheycouldengageappropriately.Sheworkedwiththesecondauthor,aresearcher,toimplementanactionresearchprojectinwhichtheycouldobservetheeffectsofFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumontheyoungstudentswithASDinherclass.Specifically,aqualitativecasestudydesignwasutilizedtoanswerthefollowingquestion:WhataretheeffectsoftheFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumandtechnologyprogramonthewritingandengagementofelementaryschoolstudentswithASD?
Participants.ParticipantsinthisstudywereOsvald,Palen,andChindi(pseudonyms),threemalesofEuropeanAmericandescentbetween5and8yearsold,andtheirteacher.Thestudents’IndividualizedEducationPrograms(IEP)eachlistedtheirprimarydiagnosisasASD,andtheywereplacedforpartoftheirdayinaself-containedprogramthatwasservingstudentswithcommunicationandcognitivedelays.Specifically,OsvaldandPalenspent80%oftheirtimeinthespecialeducationsetting,whileChindispent10%ofhistimethere.Theclassroomwascomprisedoftwelvestudents,oneduallycertifiedspecialeducation/literacyandelementaryeducationteacher,threeteachingaides,andoneteachingassistant(certifiedteacherandabletoprovidedirectinstruction).Studentparticipantswerereferredforthestudybythefirstauthor,whowastheirteacheratthetimeofthestudy.ThestudyoccurredinasuburbanelementaryschoolintheNortheasternUnitedStates.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 66
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Materials.FirstAuthorWritingCurriculum®(FirstAuthor®)wasusedwiththeparticipantsinthisstudy.TheFirstAuthor®packageincludedacurriculumguidewith80minilessons,aninstructionguidewith63tipsheets,assessmentguide,classroomposters,teacherresourceCD,andwritingsoftware.Thelessons,whicharedesignedfordevelopingwriters,eachbeganwithashortmini-lesson,followedbyindependentwritingtime,andendedwithAuthor’sChair,whichwasanopportunityforstudentstosharetheirwritingwiththegroup.
FirstAuthor®softwareofferedseveralassistivefeaturesduringthewritingprocess.First,studentsweredirectedtoaplanningscreenthatsupportstopicselectionbyprovidingphotoimagesthatcanbeindividualizedbytheteacher.Studentsselectedaphotoandwerethentakentothecomposingscreen.Thecomposingscreenhadon-screenkeyboardsandwordbanksthatincludedtopicspecificwordsinadditiontohighfrequencyandfrequentlymisspelledvocabulary.Areadaloudfeatureandself-regulatoryprompts(e.g.,verbalcuestocontinuewriting)werealsoprovided.Thefinalscreenreadthestudents’workaloudandincludeda“publish”option,whichcreatedabookcoverwithphotosandauthor’sname.
Othermaterialsincludedaclassroomdesktopcomputerorpencilandpaperusedforwriting,aMacbookPro®laptoptovideorecordeachlesson,andaugmentativecommunicationprogram,Proloquo2Go®whichwasaccessibleonaniPad®toeachstudentduringthelessons.Thisprogramwasutilizedbystudentsasapartoftheirdailyroutine;therefore,itwasprovidedduringthewritinglessonsaswell.
Procedures.Theteacherworkedone-tooneonwritingdailywitheachofthethreeparticipants.Eachlessonwascomposedoftwoparts:aminilessonfromtheFirstAuthor®Curriculum,andthenwritingtime,inwhichthestudentsusedtheskillfromtheminilessontoguidetheirwriting.Duringwritingtime,studentshadtheoptiontostartanewpieceorfinishonetheyhadalreadybeenworkingon.Afterthestudentscompletedtheirwritingtheyprinteditandcouldeithertakeithomeorputitintheclassroomlibrary.Therewerenotimeconstraintsputonthemini-lessonorwritingtime;however,mini-lessonsweredesignedtobenolongerthan15minutes.
Eachsessionvaried,dependingonthetopic,student’sinterest,motivationandengagement.Throughouttheimplementationofthewritingintervention,studentsreceivedthesamelessoneitheronceormultipletimes,attheteacher’sdiscretion.Thiswasimportantbecausethestudents’writingsuccess,engagementandachievementwastheultimategoalforthestudy,andmovingontothenextlesson,ifthestudenthadnottrulymasteredthegoalfromthepreviouslesson,wouldnothavebeenethical.Eachlessonwasrecordedforlateranalysis,andtheteachercompletedfieldnotesaftereachlesson(seebelow).
DataCollectionandAnalysis.Datawerecollectedover10monthsduringtheacademicschoolyear(September-June)andcontainedmultiplecomponents:FirstAuthor®TeacherManagementsoftware,videoobservationsofeachsessionforeachstudent,andfieldnotesfromtheteacherforeachlesson.
TheFirstAuthor®TeacherManagementSoftwareautomaticallymeasuredstudent’swritingachievement.ThesoftwareincludedmeasuressuchasTopicDiversity,whichmeasuredand
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 67
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
quantifiedthevarioustopicsthewriterself-selected;totalintelligiblewords(TIW),whichmeasuredoverallintelligibilityofthestudent’swordsandwrittenfluency;andtotaluniquewords(TUW),whichmeasuredtheoverallvocabularydiversity.
Eachlesson(mini-lessonandwriting)wasvideorecorded.Foreachstudent60minutesofpre-selectedvideorecordingwastranscribed.Thevideosegmentswereselectedatrandom;somewereoftheminilesson,somewereofthewritingsession,andsomewereacompilationofboth.Afterthetranscriptionswerecompletedanotherresearchercomparedthetranscriptionstothevideosforreliabilityandvalidity.Transcriptswereusedtoidentifywritingbehaviorsandengagement.Afterwatchingandtranscribingthevideos,researcherscreatedalistofcodesbasedonbehaviorstheynotedwhilewatchingthevideos,aswellaspreviousresearchregardingengagementofindividualswithASD.Researcherswentthroughthetranscriptionsandcodedthestudent’sbehavior.SeeTable1foralistofthecodesdevelopedandused.
Table1:ListofCodes
Code Description
VerbalinitiationStudentsinitiatedaverbalcommentaboutthelessontopic
Initiationwithtechnology StudentinitiatedacommentaboutthelessonusingtheProloquo2Go©app
Othernon-verbalinitiation Studentinitiatedbypointingtoanobjectorapicturetocommunicatewhattheywanted
Verbalresponse Studentsverballyrespondedtoarequestorquestion
Responsewithtechnology StudentsrespondedtoarequestorquestionusingtheProloquo2Go©app
Othernon-verbalresponse Studentsrespondedtoarequestorquestionbypointingtoanobjectorapicturetocommunicatewhattheywanted
Echolalia Studentrepeatedwhattheteacherwassayingorrepeatedaphrasetheycommonlyusedthatwasnotrelevanttothelesson
Physicalaggression Studenthit,kicked,swipedorthrewanobject.
Stimming Studentengagedinrepetitivebehaviors(physicalorverbal).
Eyecontact Studentlookedattheteacherintheeyesorlookedatthescreenwhenasked.
Waiting Studentwasinthedesignatedinstructionareaanddelayingbehavioralimpulses.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 68
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Escaping/leavingworkarea Studentleft(ortriedtoleave)theinstructionalareawithoutpermission
Disengaged Studentgaveofftopicresponsesorstaredoffintothedistance
Distractedbyexternalstimuli
Studentwasunabletoconcentrateonthemini-lessonorwritingbecauseofanotherstudentorenvironmentalsituation
Note:Codesinwhichthechildwasconsideredtobe“engaged”inthelessonarebolded,whilenon-boldeditemswerebehaviorsinwhichthechildwasconsideredtobe“notengaged.”
Fieldnotesweretakenduringandaftereachlessonofthestudy.Thefieldnotesincludedbothdescriptiveandreflectiveinformationaboutthestudentandsession.Thenoteswereorganizedandcompletedinresponsetoquestions.Thiswasimportantbecauseitallowedtheteachertocollectnotesonthesameinformationforeachstudent,asopposedtoarandomnarrativeaboutthesession.Thenotesincludedthedate,studentname,title/lessonnumberandattempt,didthestudentwriteduringthelesson,whatdidtheywrite,whatwasthetopic,howmanywordswerewritten,thelevelofassistance,studentbehaviorsandadditionalcommentsandobservations.Thesenotes,combinedwithvideotranscripts,allowedresearcherstoexaminethewaysinwhichtheparticipantsengagedwithFirstAuthor®.
Results
Therewereavarietyofcomplexfindingsworthnotinginregardstothisstudy.Specificthemesemergedfromthedataacrossallthreestudentparticipants,aswellasamongindividualstudents.AllthreestudentsandtheteacherseemedtobenefitfromtheuseoftheFirstAuthor®,andtheclassroomwasabetterplaceforusingit.Generalthemesincludedincreasedstudentengagement,willingnesstotransition,andincreasedqualityinteractionwithtechnologyandwithotherstudents/adults.Specifically,engagementwasnotedtobeaveryimportanttheme.Uponviewingthevideos,studentswereengagedinanaverageof67%ofthetime,withOsvaldengaged82.7%ofthetime,Palen63.2%andChindi57.2%.Overallimprovementsinwriting,suchasincreasedtopicdiversityandquantityofwriting,werealsonoted.Wewillnowdiscussspecificfindingsforeachparticipant.
Osvald.OsvaldbenefitedmostfromtheFirstAuthor®Writer’sCurriculum.Specifically,Osvaldshowedanincreaseintopicdiversity,increasedtimewriting,moreopportunitiestowrite,increasedacademiclanguage,increasedqualityofwriting,decreasedproblembehaviorsandeasiertransitionsfrompreferredactivitiestowriting.Osvald’sinteractionswithwritingpriortoFirstAuthor®weredeliveredviaastructuredtasksysteminwhichhewouldcompleteacertainnumberofwritingactivities(handwritingworksheetsandhandwritingskills)eachday.Hestruggledtogenerateideasforwritingandfatiguedquicklywhenaskedtowritesentences.Hiswritingexperienceswerelimitedanddrivenbyhislackofinterestinthetask.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 69
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
DuringtheFirstAuthor®sessions,Osvaldusedplanningmethods,suchasbrainstormingandmakinglists,toimprovehiswriting.Hewasabletoprogressfromneedingwordbankstofacilitatehiswriting/typingtowritingwithoutusingwordbanksanddevelopingphrasesindependently.ResultsalsoindicatedthatOsvaldhadincreasedtopicdiversity.PriortoFirstAuthor®hestruggledtochoosetopicsonhisown;however,oncehewasabletoseethatwhateverhewasthinkingofcouldbetypedintothesoftwareandanimagewouldcomeup,hebegantochooseavarietyoftopics.Thevarietyoftopicsallowedtheteacherandreadersofhisworkadeeperandricheraccessonwhatwas“goingoninsideofhishead”,whichwasespeciallyimportantduetohislackoflanguage.Osvald’swritingqualityalsoincreased.SincethiscurriculumrequiredOsvaldtowritequalitypieceseveryday,hewrotemorestorieswhenengaginginFirstAuthor®.PriortousingthesoftwareOsvald,hadneverwrittenastory.Duringthestudy,Osvaldwillinglywrotenumerousstoriesduringonesessiononvarioustopics.Hiswritingexperienceexpandedbeyondhandwritingtoqualitywritingexperiences.
FirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumalsohadanimpactonOsvald’sbehavior.Hehadabehaviorplanthattargetedphysicalaggressionsandelopement(runningaway),sincehewasaveraging45physicalaggressionsaday.Whenweimplementedtheintervention,ontheotherhand,wereportedanaverageof7physicalaggressions,andtheyweremainlyduringonesession.TheteacherreportedthatbecauseofOsvald’sdecreasedphysicalaggressionswhenusingFirstAuthor®shewasabletohavemorequalityacademicinteractionswithhim.TheteacheralsoreportedthatOsvald’sacademiclanguageincreased.Hewasreportedusingphraseslike“let’swrite,”and“Iamawriter.”
TheteacherreportedthatOsvaldtransitionedtowritingwithgreaterease.Priortothestudy,Osvaldwouldelope,cry,scream,orengageinselfinjuriousbehaviorswhenitwastimetotransitionfromapreferredactivitytowriting.DuringFirstAuthor,Osvaldwouldtransitionwillinglyandwouldevenasktowriteduringhisbreaks.Osvaldalsobegantoviewwritingasacollaborativeandpersonalexperienceandnotanisolatedone.Hewouldcollaborateduringplanning,hewouldinteractwiththecomputerduringwritingandlookatothers’stories,andwhenfinishedhewouldreadhiswritingstohispeersfromtheauthor’schair.Healsobegantakinghisstorieshome,andhismotherwouldintegratethemintohisbedtimeroutine.
Palen.PalenalsobenefitedfromtheFirstAuthor®Writer’sCurriculum.Heshowedanincreaseintopicdiversity,increasedtimewriting,moreopportunitiestowrite,increasedacademiclanguage,increasedqualityofwriting,andeasiertransitionsfrompreferredactivitiestowriting.LikeOsvald,Palen’sinteractionswithwritingpriortoFirstAuthor®alsoconsistedofwritingviaastructuredtasksysteminwhichhewouldcompleteacertainnumberofwritingactivities(handwritingworksheets,iPadwritingactivities,Velcrosentenceconstruction)eachday.Hestruggledtogenerateideasforwritingandfatiguedquicklywhenaskedtowritesentencesbyhand.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 70
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
OneofthegreatestfindingswithPalenwasthesignificantincreaseintopicdiversity.PriortoFirstAuthor®theteacherreportedPalenstrugglingtoattachtopicstowritingandtotheconceptthatyouwritesentencestodescribeyourtopic.Aftermini-lessonsandwritingsessions,Palenquicklywasabletonavigatethesoftwareandwouldsearchtopicsthathehadlearnedaboutearlierintheday.HistopicsrangedfromStarburststoremotecontrolcars.Palenalsowrotemore.Heengagedinwritingforlongerperiodsoftime,andwrotenumerousstoriespersession;sessionsinwhichPalenwrote6stories,forexample,werenotunusual.Palen’sacademiclanguagewasalsonotedtoincrease.Theteacherreportedthathewouldaskforhiswritingtipsheetandwouldverballyidentifypunctuationheneededfortheendofsentences.Palen’ssuccessinFirstAuthor®carriedovertohisfamilylife.HisfamilyaskedthatwritinggoalsbeputonhisIEPmovingforward,andheevengiftedhisprinted-outstoriestofamilyfriendsandsiblingsforHanukah.PalentransitionedeasiertowritingwhenitwasFirstAuthor®writingtime,andbeganviewingwritingasapersonalexperience.
Chindi.ChindialsobenefitedfromFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculum,howeverhislackoftypingabilitypreventedhimfrombenefittingasmuchashispeersdid.Forexample,Chindididnotknowhowtomaneuverthemouse,sotheteacherhadtoguidehishand,whichinherentlyremoved100%ofthechoiceduringhistimeonthecomputer.Morespecifically,ifChindiwantedtoexitthesoftware,hecouldnotbecausehecouldnotmovethemouse.Hisstimmingandlackoftechnologicalskillsnegativelyimpactedtheamountofacademicachievementandengagementhehad.Hedidnotknowhowtotype,sothetypingportionofthelessonswereheavilyprompted.FirstAuthor®didprovideChindiwithanincreasedamountofwritingopportunitiesthough.PriortoFirstAuthor®,Chindiwrotewithhisclass,butduringFirstAuthor®hewasabletowritebothduringtimewithhisclassandduringhis1:1timewiththeteacher.Hewasobservedtowriteineverylesson.
TheteacherreportedthatChindihadanincreaseintopicdiversity,from0to28uniquetopics.Onoccasion,hewroteonthesametopicmorethanonce.PriortoFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumChindididnotsuggesthisownwritingtopics.Whenhewasabletousethesoftware,hewasabletoverbalizetotheteacherorpointtowhathewantedtowriteabout.Hewroteaboutthingslikehisfamilyskiing,teapartiesandDisneyWorld.Chindi’sparticipationinFirstAuthor®carriedovertohisfamilylife.Hewouldbringhisstorieshomeandputthemonhisbookshelfathome,andhisparentsaskedforwritinggoalsforhisIEPforthenextyear.Chindiwasveryproudwhenhegottoreadhisstoryinhiskindergartengeneraleducationclassroom.
Teacher.Throughoutthedurationofthestudytheteachertookavarietyoffieldnotesandreflections.ImplementationoftheFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumprovidedsignificantsupportfortheteacher.Throughouttheinterventiontheteacher’sresultsshowedthemesofincreasedreflection,increasedqualityinteractionswiththestudents,increasedqualityofhomeandschoolconnections,increasedpreparedness,andefficacyasaneducator.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 71
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Inregardstoefficacyasaneducator,theteacherreportedfeelingbetterpreparedtoteachherstudentsbecauseoftheresourcesthatthecurriculumincluded.Theteachercouldfocusmoreondeliverythancontent,whichmadethecontentmoreaccessibletothestudents.Morespecifically,thetraditionalstandardsdonotnecessarilyspeaktotheneedsofthestudents,andtheydonotaddressstudentswithsignificantcognitiveabilities.Thiscurriculumwasspecific,intentionalandsequential,whichallowedfortheteachertospendtimetakingthatcontentandfindingawayforittoconnectwithstudentsinsteadofdesigningthecontentaswell.Theteacherwashappier,moreconfident,andsatisfiedwiththeteachingofthesestudents,becausethestudentswerebeingexposedtorigorousandqualityinstruction.
Connectionswithstudentswerealsoimpactedbythecurriculum.Theteacherhadascripttofollowthatconnecteddirectlywiththewritingskillsstudentswereaskedtolearn.Theteacherreportedbeingabletoovertlymodelsuccessfulacademicinteractionswithstudentsforotherstaff.Morespecifically,thestaffandadministratorswereabletoseethestudentsdoingsomethingacademicallyrigorous,andithelpedchangeperceptionsandpossiblyimproveinteractionsbetweenstudentsandparaprofessionals.
Discussion
InthisstudywesoughttoexaminetheeffectsoftheFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculumonthewritingandengagementofthreeelementaryschoolstudentswithASD.Resultsindicatedthatforthestudentsinthisstudy,writingmovedfromhandwritingandtracingletterstoactuallywritingstoriesbasedontheirpreferredandself-selectedtopics.Thisrepresentedashiftinthinkingaboutwhatwritingwasforthesethreestudents,andwhattheywerecapableofaswriters.
Findingsfromthisstudyindicatethattheparticipantswerehighlyengagedduringthemini-lessonsandwritingtime.Thisisapromisingfinding,sincestudentswithASDoftenhavedifficultyengagingduringinstructionaltime(Sparapani,Morgan,Reinhardt,Schatschneider,&Wetherby,2016).Studentsseemedtorequirelessredirectionandwereabletotransitionmorequicklyfromapreferredactivitytowritingtime.
Thestudentswerealsoobservedtobewritingmore,apositivefindinggiventhatmanystudentswithASDdonotoftenengageintypicalwritingactivities.Inonestudy,forinstance,Ruppar(2015)foundthatstudentswithASDandotherintellectualdisabilitiesspentminimaltime(only11%)oftheiridentifiedliteracyblockengagedinwriting,withonlyoneoffourteachersobservedtoincludewritinginclassliteracyactivities.Therefore,thefactthatstudentswereengagedinpersonallymeaningfulauthenticwritingexperienceswascommendable.Additionally,thestudentswerenotedtoincreasetheirtopicdiversity.Thiswasanespeciallyencouragingfindingastheparticipantsinthisstudy,likemanypeoplewithASD,hadspecificintereststhattheytendedtowanttodiscussallthetime(Gunn&Delafield-Butt,2016).Thefactthattheycouldusethesoftwaretobrainstormandhavepicturestosupporttheirideaswasabenefit.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 72
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
TheteacherinthisstudyreportedfeelingmoreconfidentandpreparedtoteachherstudentswhenusingtheFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculum,apositivefindinggiventhatmanyteachers,bothspecialandgeneraleducation,donotfeelpreparedtoteachwritingtotheirstudents(Cutler&Graham,2008).ProgramssuchasFirstAuthor®mayhelptofillagapformanyteachersofstudentswithcomplexsupportneedswhobelievethattheydonothavetheappropriatecurriculumormaterialstoteachwritingtothispopulation(Sturm,2012;Sturm,Cali,Nelson,&Staskowski,2012).
Anunanticipatedoutcomeofthisstudywasthewayinwhichuseoftheprogramenhancedhome/schoolrelationships.Parentswerereadingtheirchildren’sstoriesathomeandonestudentactuallygavehisstoriesaspresents.Inaddition,twoofthethreeparticipants’familiesaskedthatindividualgoalsinwritingbeaddedtotheirchildren’sIEPs.Thiswasanespeciallyexcitingfinding,becauseitrepresentedthefactthattheparentsnowbelievedtheirchildrenwerecapableofbeingwriters,whichtheyhadnotthoughtbefore.
LimitationsandImplications
Sincethiswasaqualitative,exploratorystudy,therewasnodataexaminingthegainsinwritingachievementandengagementpriortoandafterusingtheFirstAuthor®WritingCurriculum.Futureresearchshouldconsiderutilizingsingle-caseorgroupdesignstudiesthatexaminetheeffectivenessoftheprogramonyoungwriterswithASD.Inaddition,itisunknownwhetherthewritinglessonsorthetechnologyhadagreatereffectonthestudents’abilitytoattendandimprovewritingoutcomes.Futureresearchdirectlycomparingtechnologywithpaper/pencilwritingtaskswillhelpdeterminewhetherthelessonsorthesoftwareprogramalonemayhaveanimpactonstudents’writing.Similarly,althoughstudentswerehighlyengagedduringboththemini-lessonsandwhileusingthesoftware,itmightbeinterestingtonotetrendsinstudents’engagementacrossthesetwoaspectsoftheprogram(i.e.,duringwhichpartofthelessonweretheymore/lessengaged).
Conclusion
ThefindingsofthisactionresearchprojectaddtoasmallbutgrowingbodyofresearchonwritingforstudentswithASD.Usingaqualitativecasestudymethodallowedformorein-depth,richobservationoftheeffectsoftheprogrambeyondquantitativeoutcomes.WehopethatthisstudymaydrawattentiontothepossibilitythatstudentswithASDandconcurrentcommunicationandcognitivechallengesmaybecomeskilled,competentwriterswhengivenproperinstruction.Inaddition,webelievethisstudyallowsteacherstoseethebenefitsofusingsuchaprogramtoallowformorepersonalized,meaningful,andcontextualizedwritinginstructionforallstudents.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 73
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
AbouttheAuthors
KristieAsaro-Saddler,Ph.D.isanAssociateProfessorintheDivisionofSpecialEducationattheUniversityatAlbany.Herresearchinterestsfocusonwritingandself-regulatorystrategies,specificallyforstudentswithAutismSpectrumDisorders(ASD).ShehaspublishedinspecialeducationjournalsincludingtheJournalofSpecialEducation,ExceptionalChildren,andRemedialandSpecialEducation,andhaspresentedatnationalandinternationalconferencesintheareaofwriting.PriortojoiningthefacultyattheUniversityatAlbanyshewasaspecialeducationteacherforchildrenwithASDanddevelopmentaldisabilities.Email:[email protected]
JessicaColes,M.S.Ed.isadoctoralresearchfellowattheUniversityatAlbanyintheEducationalPsychologyandMethodologyprogram.Herresearchinterestsfocusonspecialeducation,teacherpreparationandculturalresponsiveness.Shehasbeenaspecialeducationteacherforsixyears,andworksprimarilywithelementarystudentswhohaveASDormooddisorders.Email:[email protected]
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 74
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
ReferencesAsaro-Saddler,K.(2016).Writinginstructionandself-regulationforstudentswithAutismSpectrumDisorders: Asystematicreviewoftheliterature.TopicsinLanguageDisorders,36,266-283.Asaro-Saddler,K.,Arcidiacono,M.&MorrisDeyoe,M.(2017).Instructionalpracticeforstudentswithautism
spectrumandrelateddisorders:Exploringtheteachingofwritingintwoself-containedclassrooms.ReadingandWritingQuarterly,33(2),171-186.
Asaro-Saddler,K.,Muir-Knox,H.,Meredith,H.,&Akhmedjanova,D.(2015).Usingtechnologytosupport
studentswithAutismSpectrumDisordersinthewritingprocess.InsightsonLearningDisabilities,12,103-119.
Asaro-Saddler,K.&Saddler,B.(2010).Planninginstructionandself-regulationtraining:Effectsonwriterswith
AutismSpectrumDisorders.ExceptionalChildren,77,107-124.Bishop,A.E.,Sawyer,M.,Alber-Morgan,S.R.,&Boggs,M.(2015).Effectsofagraphicorganizertraining
packageonthepersuasivewritingofmiddleschoolstudentswithautism.EducationandTraininginAutismandDevelopmentalDisabilities,50,290-302.
Carnahan,C.R.,Williamson,P.S.,&Christman,J.(2011).Linkingcognitionandliteracyinstudentswithautism
spectrumdisorder.TeachingExceptionalChildren,43(6),54-62.Carnahan,C.,Williamson,P.,Hollingshead,A.,&Israel,M.(2012).Usingtechnologytosupportbalanced
literacyforstudentswithsignificantdisabilities.TeachingExceptionalChildren,45,20-29.Cutler,L.,&Graham,S.(2008).Primarygradewritinginstruction;Anationalsurvey.JournalofEducational
Psychology,100,907-919.Gunn,K.C.M.,&Delafield-Butt,J.T.(2016).Teachingchildrenwithautismspectrumdisorderwithrestricted
interests:Areviewofevidenceforbestpractice.ReviewofEducationalResearch,86,408-430.Joseph,L.M.,&Konrad,M.(2009).Teachingstudentswithintellectualordevelopmentaldisabilitiestowrite:
Areviewoftheliterature.ResearchinDevelopmentalDisabilities,30,1-19.Kagohara,D.M.,Sigafoos,J.,Achmadi,D.,O’Reilly,M.,&Lancioni,G.(2012).Teachingchildrenwithautism
spectrumdisorderstocheckthespellingofwords.ResearchinAutismSpectrumDisorders,6,304–310.
Keefe,E.B.,&Copeland,S.R.(2011).Whatisliteracy?Thepowerofadefinition.ResearchandPracticefor
PersonswithSevereDisabilities,36,92-99.Kluth,P.,&Chandler-Olcott,K.(2008).Alandwecanshare.Baltimore:PaulH.BrooksPublishing.Moore,D.W.,Anderson,A.,Treccase,F.,Deppeler,J.,Furlonger,B.,&Didden,R.(2013).Avideo-based
packagetoteachachildwithautismspectrumdisordertowritehername.JournalofDevelopmentalandPhysicalDisabilities,25,493-503.
Pennington,R.C.,Collins,B.C.,Stenhoff,D.M.,Turner,K.,&Gunselman,K.(2014).Usingsimultaneous
promptingtoteachgenerativewritingtostudentswithautism.EducationandTraininginAutismandDevelopmentalDisabilities,49,396-414.
Pennington,R.C.&Delano,M.D.(2012).Writinginstructionforstudentswithautismspectrumdisorders:A
reviewofliterature.FocusonAutismandDevelopmentalDisabilities,27,158-167.
THEJOURNALOFTEACHERACTIONRESEARCH 75
JournalofTeacherActionResearch- Volume6,Issue1,Fall2019,<practicalteacherresearch.com>,ISSN#2332-2233©JTAR.AllRights
Ruppar,A.L.(2015).Apreliminarystudyoftheliteracyexperiencesofadolescentswithseveredisabilities.
RemedialandSpecialEducation,36,235–245.Ruppar,A.,Gaffney,J.S.,&Dymond,S.K.(2015).Influencesonteachers’decisionsaboutliteracyfor
secondarystudentswithseveredisabilities.ExceptionalChildren,8,209-226.Schneider,A.B.,Codding,R.S.,&Tryon,G.S.(2013).Comparingandcombiningaccommodationand
remediationinterventionstoimprovethewrittenlanguageperformanceofchildrenwithAspergersyndrome.FocusonAutismandOtherDevelopmentalDisabilities,28,101–114.
Sparapani,N,Morgan,L.,Reinhardt,V..,Schatschneider,C.,Wetherby,A.M.(2016).Evaluationofactive
engagementinelementarystudentswithautismspectrumdisorder.JournalofAutismandDevelopmentalDisorders,46,782-796.
Sturm,J.M.(2012).Anenrichedwriters’workshopforbeginningwriterswithdevelopmentaldisabilities.
TopicsinLanguageDisorders,32,335-360.Sturm,J.M.(2015).FirstAuthorWritingCurriculum:Acomprehensivewritingcurriculumforbeginningwriters.
Volo,IL:DonJohnstonandCentralMichiganUniversity.Retrievedfromhttp://donjohnston.com/wp-content/downloads/extras/first_author_writing_curriculum_sampler.pdf
Sturm,J.M.,Cali,K.,Nelson,N.W.,&Staskowski,M.(2012).Thedevelopmentalwritingscale:Anewprogress
monitoringtoolforbeginningwriters.TopicsinLanguageDisorders,32,297-318.Sparapani,N.,Morgan,L.,Reinhardt,V.P.,Schatschneider,C.,&Wetherby,A.M.(2016).Evaluationof
classroomactiveengagementinelementarystudentswithautismspectrumdisorder.JournalofAutismandDevelopmentalDisorders,46,782–796.
Wollak,B.A.,&Koppenhaver,D.,A.(2011).Developingtechnology-supported,evidence-basedwriting
instructionforadolescentswithsignificantwritingdisabilities.AssistiveTechnologyOutcomesandBenefits,7,1-23.