21
“ PRIMARY COLON CANCER : ESMO CLINICAL PRACTISE GUIDELINES FOR DIAGNOSIS, ADJUVANT TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP” Pembimbing : Dr. Firmansyah, Sp.B Penerjemah : Lira Fitrianti Wangi Dinan Amika Adefury Maharani

Journal Reading Surgery

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Journal Reading Surgery

JOURNAL READING :“ PRIMARY COLON CANCER :

ESMO CLINICAL PRACTISE GUIDELINES FOR DIAGNOSIS, ADJUVANT TREATMENT AND

FOLLOW-UP”

Pembimbing :

Dr. Firmansyah, Sp.B

Penerjemah :

Lira Fitrianti

Wangi Dinan Amika

Adefury Maharani

Page 2: Journal Reading Surgery

GENERAL INFORMATION

Page 3: Journal Reading Surgery
Page 4: Journal Reading Surgery
Page 5: Journal Reading Surgery

SCREENING

The major aim is to detect the 90%of sporadic cases of cancer, most of which occur in people above the age 50 years.

Up to now two strategies have been available ; Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) and endoscopy.

The most extensively scrutinized method, FOBT, has been shown in cancer by up to 25% among those attending at least one round ofscreening.

Screening should be offerd to men and women aged 50 years until 74 years, the screening interval should be 1-2 years and the strategies should be implemented within organized programmes.

Page 6: Journal Reading Surgery

DIAGNOSIS

• Endoscopy is the main tool for diagnosis and it can be performed to varying lenght using either a sigmoidoscope or colonoscope.

• Additional investigation might improve the result : virtual colonoscopy or CT colonography,even though they are not yet standard procedures, could be valuable to precisely locate the tumour.

Page 7: Journal Reading Surgery

STAGING

Page 8: Journal Reading Surgery

STAGING

Page 9: Journal Reading Surgery

Instrumental work up. A preoperative chest radiograph and ;iver ultrasonography could be adequate even though CT scan (chest and abdomen) is more appropriate. MRI might be useful for locally advanced cases,but it is use is generally restricted to rectal cancer. PET and immunoscintigraphy are methods under evaluation and are currently mainly proposed for differentiating scar and tumour tissue after surgery and/or radiotherapy

Page 10: Journal Reading Surgery
Page 11: Journal Reading Surgery

PROGNOSIS• Disease relaps (local recurrence and/or distant metastases) following surgery is a major problem and is very often the ultimate cause of death.

• Bowel obstruction and perforation are clinical indicators of poor prognosis.

Page 12: Journal Reading Surgery

ADJUVANT THERAPY

Page 13: Journal Reading Surgery

ADJUVANT THERAPY

Page 14: Journal Reading Surgery

STRATEGY OF TREATMENT BY STAGE

Complete endoscopic polypectomy should be performed whenever the morphological structure of the polyp permits. The presence of invasive carcinoma in a polyp requires a thorough review with thw pathologist for histological features that are associated with an adverse outcome.

When unfavourable histological features are present in a polyp from a patient with an average operative risk,resection is recommended.

Page 15: Journal Reading Surgery

LOCALIZED DISEASE

The goal surgery is a wide resection of the involved segment of bowel together with removal of its lymphatic drainage.

The extent of the colonic resection is determined by the blood supply and distribution of regional lymph nodes.

The resection should include a segment of colon of at least 5cm on either side of the tumour, although wider margins are often included because of the obligatory ligation of the arterial blood supply.

Page 16: Journal Reading Surgery

Obstructive colorectal cancers can be treated in one or two stages. Two stages procedures can include colostomy first followed by colonic resection, or Hartmann’s procedure firstfollowed by colostomy closure and anastomosis

Page 17: Journal Reading Surgery

FOLLOW-UP

Despite optimal primary treatment, with adequate surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, 30-50% of patients with colon cancer will relapse and die of their disease. Detecting relapse in advance is the main goal of surveillance after primary treatment, but this is clinically meaningful only if it improves survival.

In the last few years four further systematic revisions have been published. All of those demonstrated an improved survival for patient undergoing more intensive surveillance as compared with those with minimalor no follow-up. The estimated OS gainwas between 7% and 13%.

Page 18: Journal Reading Surgery
Page 19: Journal Reading Surgery
Page 20: Journal Reading Surgery
Page 21: Journal Reading Surgery