Upload
bodai
View
92
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
JPM_Indonesia_Property_C_2014-05-07_1386436
Citation preview
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Indonesia Property
Changes, challenges and choices
Property
Felicia Tandiyono AC
(62-21) 5291-8574
PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia
Aditya Srinath, CFA
(62-21) 5291-8573
PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia
Cusson Leung
(852) 2800-8526
J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited
Joy Wang
(65) 6882-2312
J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private
Limited
See page 72 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the
firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in
making their investment decision.
We initiate coverage of the Indonesia property sector with a positive
view on the housing development and Jakarta retail lease market
outlook, a cautious view on the Jakarta office lease outlook and a
negative view on apartment development over the next 12 months.
Property stocks have outperformed JCI by 14% YTD in anticipation of
better post-election infrastructure progress. Property stocks recently traded
at one standard deviation above the average sector discount, reflecting this
optimism. In the face of near-term headwinds, we think there are only
select opportunities across the property space for the next two to four
quarters. We rate Summarecon and Ciputra Development Overweight
and Pakuwon, Bumi Serpong Damai and Lippo Karawaci Neutral.
Near-term regulatory changes: Potentially negative across segments.
We believe any regulatory changes will be generally negative short-term
before becoming more positive long-term. Three regulatory changes to
watch, especially after the elections, are policies on government-
subsidized housing, zoning laws and building permits. There have been
predecessor policies within the past 24 months, but they have had issues
with clarity and execution.
Potential structural changes: Long-term positive across property
segments. Three potential structural changes that we believe are likely to
emerge in 2015 are: (1) infrastructure progress; (2) property industry
consolidation; and (3) mortgage product evolution. We believe all three
changes are likely to be positive in the longer term for property prices.
Supportive affordability: Positive for housing. Housing affordability
nationally is likely to remain supportive in 2014 and 2015, in our view.
The settlement of the mortgage disbursement scheme for housing
developments in 1QFY14 provides incentives for developers to promote
back mortgage payments to customers. Our mortgage rate assumption is
9% for end-2014 and 2015, still among low rates seen in the market.
12-month stock views: Selective opportunities. We expect Indonesian
property developers to continue to trade at one standard deviation above
their average discount to RNAV because we expect slow regulatory
changes, a positive impact from emerging structural changes in 2015 and
a stable mortgage rate outlook.
Figure 1: Property sector vs. JCI YTD
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Bloomberg.
Figure 2: Sector RNAV discount band
(+/-1SD)
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
90
105
120
135
150
JCI (re-based)
Sector (re-based)
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
2Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Table of Contents
Sector investment thesis .........................................................3
Sector catalysts........................................................................4
Positives .................................................................................................................4
Negatives ................................................................................................................4
Sector risks...............................................................................5
Sector performance drivers.....................................................7
Stock investment summary.....................................................8
Sector strategy ........................................................................................................8
Stock preferences ....................................................................................................8
Investment thesis summary......................................................................................9
Valuation metrics....................................................................11
Industry analysis ....................................................................13
Demand drivers.....................................................................................................13
Supply drivers.......................................................................................................16
Companies ..............................................................................17
Summarecon .........................................................................................................20
Ciputra Development ............................................................................................30
Pakuwon ...............................................................................................................41
Bumi Serpong Damai ............................................................................................51
Lippo Karawaci.....................................................................................................62
3Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Table 1: Indonesia property stock coverage
Price
(Rp)
PT
(Rp)
% to
PT Rating
Mkt cap
(US$ M)
Avg. TO
3 mos.
(US$ M)
RNAV/share (Rp)
YTD
perf.FY14E FY15E
BSDE 1,525 1,500 -2% N 2,317 3.7 1,982 2,063 16%
CTRA 990 1,700 72% OW 1,304 2.5 2,196 2,372 27%
LPKR 1,050 900 -14% N 2,104 8.8 1,164 1,225 15%
PWON 365 385 5% N 1,526 1.6 408 446 30%
SMRA 1,095 1,900 74% OW 1,372 2.2 2,395 2,694 34%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Bloomberg. Pricing data as of 6 May 2014.
Sector investment thesis
We initiate coverage of the Indonesia property sector with the following views:
We are most positive on the housing development and Jakarta retail lease
outlook.
We are neutral on the Jakarta office lease outlook.
We are negative on the apartment development outlook.
We have not published a view on hotels and industrial estates, as the property
companies under our coverage have low exposure to these segments.
Our 12-month views are influenced by potential regulatory changes. We believe
upcoming policies or supporting regulations are likely to address government-
subsidized housing, property zoning (which supports better city planning) and
building permits. These measures are likely to create negative sentiment for the
property sector near-term, in our view, though they may be positive for the sector in
the long run.
We are positive on the property sector in the long run in light of the potential for a
more reformist government post-2014. We see three potential structural changes for
the sector that are likely to emerge in 2015:
Infrastructure progress. The land acquisition for public infrastructure law will
become effective January 2015. The duration of land acquisition is 260-520 days,
based on the law. Therefore, actual construction progress may start in 3QFY15 at
the earliest or 3QFY16 at the latest.
Property industry consolidation. Two reasons: (1) The mortgage disbursement
scheme introduced last year may have created cash flow issues for smaller
developers that build high-rise developments. (2) Higher land tax in Jakarta and
other cities in Indonesia may have created cash constraints for smaller developers
that have large unsold landbank.
Mortgage product evolution. The trigger could be another round of fuel subsidy
removals, as in 2008. We think there is room for banks to offer mortgage
durations of more than 15 years or longer fixed-rate durations, assuming a
healthy banking sector. Most banks currently offer a fixed teaser rate for the first
12-24 months, followed by a floating rate for the remaining mortgage duration.
Floating rates are typically 300bps above fixed rates.
Prefer housing development and
Jakarta lease retail assets
Long-term positive, given
potential structural changes
4Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
We expect Indonesia property stocks to trade at one standard deviation above their
historical average discount within the next 12 months, or unchanged from current
valuation levels. Stock prices have partly reflected optimism regarding:
The enforcement of regulatory changes in stages.
The potential emergence of structural changes in 2015, which would create
positive sentiment for the sector.
A stable mortgage rate outlook that supports pre-sales growth.
Figure 3: Sector outperformance vs. JCI YTD
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Figure 4: Pre-sales versus mortgage rate
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Sector catalysts
Positives
Rebound in housing pre-sales soon. The housing mortgage disbursement
scheme reached in 1QFY14 between property developers and banks lifted an
overhang on sales and hence should be positive for the sector, in our view. We
expect pre-sales to show signs of a rebound in 2QFY14 and a more pronounced
rebound in 2HFY14 due to increasing confidence among developers to launch
projects once election noise subsides.
Consolidation likely in FY15, given how policy-ridden the sector is. We believe
consolidation would likely favor the major property companies, which are the
companies in our coverage. Companies with stronger balance sheets will be the
most ready to acquire landbank or projects from midsize to smaller companies.
Infrastructure reform remains the long-awaited catalyst. The land acquisition
for public infrastructure law becomes effective January 2015. Any significant
pickup in infrastructure construction will likely be seen only in September 2015
at the earliest or 3QFY16 at the latest, in our view. The timeframe to clear land
acquisition issues is limited to 260-520 days, based on the law.
Negatives
A two-round presidential election would increase political uncertainty and
hence short-term negative sentiment toward the Indonesia equity market, in our
view. Indonesia property stocks, among other recently hyped infrastructure
beneficiary-themed sectors, may underperform non-infrastructure beneficiary-
90
105
120
135
150
1/1/ 2014 2/ 1/ 2014 3/1/2014 4/ 1/ 2014
JCI (re-based) Sector ( re-based)
Mar 14th,
Jokowi
announce
d as
president
candidate
Banks and developers agreed
on housing mortgage
disbursement
Apr 9th,
PDIP
parliam
entary
votes
disappo
ints
presidential
d isappoint
the market
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
Pre-sales growth YoY Mortgage rate (RHS)
Sector expected to trade at 1SD
above average discount to RNAV
5Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
themed sectors. Our base-case scenario does not assume a two-round presidential
election.
Mortgage disbursements for high-rise residential continue to stall. The
specifics of the mortgage disbursement scheme for high-rise development
construction are still being discussed by developers and banks. We think
agreement will not be reached easily, as the construction of high-rise
developments requires higher technical skills. While there is a potential
alternative solutioni.e., developers opting for construction loans, with the
mortgage-provider banks to aid funding for constructionit is not appealing
from developers cash flow perspective, in our view.
Mortgage rates may rise following a 25bps forecasted increase for benchmark
interest rates this year. A mortgage rate increase of 25-50bps following an
interest rate rise would pose significantly less risk to pre-sales than would a 50-
100bps increase. The stock performance of property companies with high
exposure to development properties are at higher risk. Our base-case scenario
assumes that mortgage rates remain at current levels, an average of 9%, until the
end of 2014 and no fuel subsidy removal until 2015.
Sector risks
We identify several upside and downside risks to our view of the Indonesia property
sector, summarized in the following table.
Table 2: Upside/downside risks
Area of risk Type of risk
1. Potential for a new government Upside
2. Issuance of supporting regulations on Housing Law Downside short-term; Upside long-term
3. Another round of fuel subsidy removals Downside short-term; Upside long-term
4. Policy on government-subsidized housing Downside
5. Scarcity of contractors Downside (applicable only to high-rise development)
6. Further tightening measures issued by Bank Indonesia Downside (applicable only to development properties)
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
We rank the probability of risks materializing, from highest and lowest, as follows:
1. The potential for a new government: We believe the Indonesia stock market,
including the property sector, may re-rate near-term if the current favorite in
opinion polls is elected as Indonesias new president. Beyond that, Cabinet
composition will be key. An incoming Administration could introduce crucial
reforms that are positive for the Indonesian economy long-term.
2. Issuance of supporting regulations on Housing Law (UU no. 1/2011): We
think the initial round of supporting regulation issuance is likely to address city
planning for residential, commercial, industrial and public facility zoning. Jakarta
province is scheduled to release supporting regulation based on Housing Law
2011 by mid-2014.
3. Another round of fuel subsidy removals: Fuel subsidy removals are positive
for Indonesias economy in the long term, in our view, but we expect another
round of inflation hikes and potentially higher interest rates in response to such a
move. We think there is a smaller probability of another round of fuel subsidy
removals this year than next year.
6Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
4. Policy on government-subsidized housing: Government-subsidized housing has
long been debated by private developers for its unattractive returns, given fixed
selling prices. If fixed selling prices are amended, we believe there is likely to be
another push from government to pass on more obligations for private developers
to deliver subsidized housing. The specific obligations of private developers to
deliver the units of subsidized housing have not been clearly stated in prior
regulations.
5. Scarcity of contractors: This risk is relevant only for high-rise projects, in our
view. Housing construction typically employs midsize to small contractors, of
which there are many in Indonesia. High-rise project construction requires skilled
contractors, who are typically employed by the top few construction companies in
the country. These companies may be occupied with several national
infrastructure projects.
6. Further tightening measures issued by Bank Indonesia (BI): We think this
risk is low for now, as we believe BI has no strong reason to pursue further
tightening. The new loan-to-value and mortgage disbursement scheme effective
October 2013 seem to have successfully suppressed mortgage lending. Mortgage
growth has remained in the 0-3% range MoM and declined YoY. BI survey data
on residential prices suggest that housing prices have declined since September
2013. Our data on residential pre-sales growth suggest that transactions have also
declined significantly since September 2013.
Figure 5: Loan growth YoY, by type
Source: CEIC.
Figure 6: Loan growth MoM, by type
Source: CEIC.
Figure 7: BI survey on residential prices (14 cities)
Source: CEIC.
Figure 8: Quarterly pre-sales growth YoY*
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data. * For property companies under our coverage.
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Housing + Apartment + Shophouses Vehicles
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Housing + Apartment + Shophouses Vehicles
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
7Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Sector performance drivers
Indonesia property stock performance is sensitive to pre-sales. Property companies
typically announce pre-sales data monthly or quarterly in the following one to three
months. Pre-sales data are a key driver of stock performance, as many Indonesian
property companies NAVs are driven largely by their development properties.
We have created a property sector index to track the share price movements of the
five property companies under our coverage. We believe Indonesia stocks do not
generally respond to results announcements due to the time lag between the booking
of earnings and pre-sales. Development property pre-sales are booked one to three
years late, depending on construction rates.
Ciputra Development and Summarecon announce pre-sales monthly. Bumi Serpong
Damai, Pakuwon and Lippo Karawaci announce pre-sales quarterly, although there
have been times their when pre-sales data were announced monthly.
Figure 9: Indonesia property sector index tracks pre-sales growth
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Property share price performance is also driven by events like:
Significant landbank acquisitions
Sizeable project acquisitions
Major development launches
These events drive share prices because they add to future pre-sales growth
expectations, in our view.
We believe intraday base IDR lending rates issued by BI are the best leading
indicator of property pre-sales growth. Pre-sales growth has a strong negative
correlation with BI lending rates, at 0.7, the strongest correlation among economic
data.
Intraday base lending rate changes eventually translate into mortgage rate changes, as
well as in-house rates of installments to developers. This is the main reason why the
correlation with pre-sales is the strongest, in our view.
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
Sector index performance Pre-sales growth YoY
Pre-sales announcement drives
stock performance most
Major acquisitions and launches
matter
Base IDR lending rates as
leading indicator of mortgage
rates
8Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 10: Pre-sales versus inverted BI intraday base lending rate
Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Stock investment summary
Sector strategy
Our 12-month view differs by property segment:
We are most positive on housing development and the Jakarta lease retail
outlook.
We are neutral on the Jakarta lease office outlook.
We are negative on the apartment development outlook.
Stock preferences
Our preferred stock is Summarecon (SMRA), followed by Ciputra Development
(CTRA). Both companies strategies focus on housing developments. SMRAs
revenue from housing development is around 70%, with 20% from lease retail.
CTRAs revenue from housing development is around 90%.
We employ a scoring system to determine our stock preferences. Our scoring system
considers growth outlooks, profitability, leverage and current valuations. These four
variables are the important variables in determining Indonesia property stock
performance, in our view.
Table 3: Indonesia property stocks scoring
Scores Growth Profitability Leverage Valuation
Sum of
scores
SMRA 4 3 3 5 15
CTRA 3 2 5 4 14
PWON 2 4 4 2 12
BSDE 1 5 2 3 11
LPKR 5 1 1 1 8
Data
Pre-sales
2014E
EBIT margin
2014E
Net DE
2014E
RNAV disc.
2015E
SMRA 38% 34% 0.04 -59%
CTRA 14% 32% 0.28 -58%
PWON 12% 43% 0.05 -18%
BSDE -1% 47% 0.04 -26%
LPKR 68% 28% (0.14) -14%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. Pricing data as of 6 May 2014.
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.08
0.08
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Quarterly pre-sales Rp trn Inverted BI intraday base lending rate (RHS)
Preferred stocks: SMRA, then
CTRA
9Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Table 4: Indonesia property stocks RNAV contribution per segment
Development Investment
Low-rise High-rise Office Retail Hotels Others
SMRA 77% 1% 1% 18% 4% 0%
CTRA 95% 2% 0% 2% 1% 0%
PWON 21% 34% 5% 36% 4% 0%
BSDE 94% 0% 3% 1% 2% 0%
LPKR 69% 5% 0% 5% 7% 15%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. Note: Blue shading = We have a positive view on the segment; light grey shading = We have a
cautious view on the segment; dark grey shading = We have a negative view on the segment.
Investment thesis summary
The following summarizes our investment thesis by stock, based on our order of
preference:
Summarecon (SMRA): Replicating successful township model
We initiate coverage of SMRA with an Overweight rating and Jun-15 PT of
Rp1,900. SMRA plans to add its fourth township before the end of 2014. The fourth
township in Bandung could contribute 20% of SMRAs RNAV in three years time.
The fourth township is situated to benefit from tollroad construction plans within the
area. We are positive on the rental rate outlook of SMRAs lease retail assets in
Jakarta and Greater Jakarta.
Ciputra Development (CTRA): Housing focus
We initiate coverage of CTRA with an Overweight rating and Jun-15 PT of Rp1,700.
CTRA should benefit the most from the finalization of the housing mortgage
disbursement scheme between banks and property developers, in our view.
Management continues to focus on growing pre-sales nationally through joint
venture projects. These projects allow for higher pre-sales growth without additional
funding needs, as landbank is provided by the joint venture partners. The joint
venture strategy has proven to be as profitable as CTRAs non- joint venture projects
since 2011.
Figure 11: SMRA share price
performance
Source: Bloomberg.
Figure 12: CTRA share price
performance
Source: Bloomberg.
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
SMRA share price
JCI re-based
500
700
900
1100
1300
1500
1700
CTRA share price
JCI re-based
10
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Pakuwon Jati (PWON): Crucial time to expand
We initiate coverage of PWON with a Neutral rating and Jun-15 PT of Rp385. We
believe the positive outlook for PWONs lease retail assets in Jakarta is largely
reflected in the share price. Company plans for landbank acquisitions have yet to
translate into significant additions to project pipelines. We also think the market has
partly reflected potential positive news from the landbank acquisition plan, as this
plan was announced by management some time ago.
Bumi Serpong Damai (BSDE): Early stage of diversification
We initiate coverage of BSDE with a Neutral rating and Jun-15 PT of Rp1,500. We
think BSDEs share price does not fully reflect the potential of the companys
strategy to expand across different property segments and different project locations.
We believe this diversification is likely to support the companys near-term growth
as growth prospects from BSDEs large flagship project in BSD City, west Greater
Jakarta area, start to decline.
Lippo Karawaci (LPKR): Hospital versus developing property
We initiate coverage of LPKR with a Neutral rating and Jun-15 PT of Rp900. We
think there are opportunity costs to LPKRs strategy of focusing on hospital and
lease retail in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities across Indonesia. LPKR appears to have been
forgoing opportunities in housing development and Jakarta investment property,
which provide higher returns and profitability, in our opinion. LPKRs ambition to
grow hospital and lease retail is weighing on its balance sheet and profitability, as
evidenced by its having the weakest ROE and margin among companies under our
coverage. However, we think the monetization of hospital or lease retail assets,
though infrequent, may provide one-off gains and much-needed capital.
Figure 13: PWON share price
performance
Source: Bloomberg.
Figure 14: BSDE share price
performance
Source: Bloomberg.
Figure 15: LPKR share price
performance
Source: Bloomberg.
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
PWON share price
JCI re-based
1000
1500
2000
2500
BSDE share price
JCI re-based
500
1000
1500
2000
LPKR share price
JCI re-based
11
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Valuation metrics
We derive Indonesia property stocks Restated Net Asset Value (RNAV) using a
DCF methodology for development properties, assuming continuous pre-sales and
applying a single cap rate for investment properties. We do not use market values
because they are not publicly available, and property transactions data are also not
transparent.
We set companies price targets at either one or two standard deviations above the
average sector discount to respective RNAV. The bases for our discounts are:
Companies with higher development property exposure should trade at least at
1SD above the average sector discount a year from now because: (1) the
mortgage rate outlook is unchanged at 9% in FY14-15; and (2) pre-sales are
expected to grow c20% in FY14-15, similar to FY13. We expect sector pre-sales
to grow 21% in 2014 and 19% in 2015 vs. 23% in 2013. 1QFY14 pre-sales
reached only 15% of our FY14 estimate, but we expect c65% of pre-sales to be
achieved in 2HFY14.
Companies with higher investment property exposure should trade at least at 2SD
above the average sector discount a year from now because: (1) investment
property companies have historically traded at 1SD above developers; and (2) our
12-month 10-year bond yield outlook of 8% is approximately where current
yields are trading.
Indonesia property stocks currently trade at almost one standard deviation above
their historical average discount. The sector had traded at an average 40% discount to
RNAV, with a 6% discount to RNAV at the peak and a 61% discount to RNAV at
the bottom since FY06. We calculate that one standard deviation is equivalent to a
15% discount, based on available historical data.
Figure 16: Indonesia property stocks historical discount to RNAV
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
-80%
-70%
-60%
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
Sector average Mean +1SD -1SD +2SD -2SD
Sector is almost at a +1SD
discount to RNAV
12
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Table 5: Indonesia property stock coverage
RNAV/share (Rp) Pre-sales (Rp tn)
Investment
prop./gross RNAV
Price
(Rp) PT (Rp) % to PT Rating
Mkt cap
(US$ M)
Avg. TO
3 mos.
(US$ M) FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E
YTD
perf.
BSDE 1,525 1,500 -2% N 2,317 3.7 1,982 2,063 7.2 8.9 5% 6% 21%
CTRA 990 1,700 72% OW 1,304 2.5 2,196 2,372 10.2 11.8 4% 3% 37%
LPKR 1,050 900 -14% N 2,104 8.8 1,164 1,225 6.9 8.5 11% 11% 18%
PWON 365 385 5% N 1,526 1.6 408 446 3.4 3.9 42% 45% 30%
SMRA 1,095 1,900 74% OW 1,372 2.1 2,395 2,694 5.1 5.9 19% 22% 40%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. Pricing data as of 6 May 2014.
Table 6: Indonesia property sector valuation metrics
Prem. (disc.)
to RNAV
P/E - overall
(x) EPS growth P/B (x) ROE
Pre-sales
growth
P/E -
development
only (x)
Net cash
(debt)/equity EBIT margin
FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E
BSDE -23% -26% 9.9 9.8 0% 1% 1.7 1.5 17% 15% -1% 23% 9.1 8.3 0.04 0.09 47% 41%
CTRA -55% -58% 11.1 8.9 39% 25% 1.3 1.1 12% 12% 14% 16% 8.2 7.3 0.28 0.37 32% 30%
LPKR -10% -14% 8.2 15.3 140% -46% 1.4 1.3 17% 9% 68% 23% 12.6 20.9 (0.14) (0.18) 28% 21%
PWON -10% -18% 12.3 10.3 26% 19% 3.3 2.7 27% 26% 12% 16% 8.4 7.2 0.05 0.12 43% 42%
SMRA -54% -59% 13.3 9.9 8% 34% 2.8 2.3 21% 23% 38% 14% 10.7 10.0 0.04 0.01 34% 28%
Avg. -31% -35% 11.0 10.8 42% 7% 2.1 1.8 19% 17% 26% 18% 9.8 10.8 0.05 0.08 37% 33%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. Pricing data as of 6 May 2014.
Figure 17: Regional property sector valuation matrix
NAV Core EPS growth Dividend yield P/B (x)
Net
gearing EPS/BVPS
discount FY14E FY15E FY13 FY14E FY14E FY14E FY14E
China property
Sector average (market cap weighted) -46% 23.3% 17.2% 5.1% 5.3% 0.9 44% 16.2%
Hong Kong property
Developer average (market cap weighted) -39% 0.4% -4.0% 3.2% 3.2% 0.7 11% 6.0%
Investor average (market cap weighted) -33% 4.0% 7.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.7 15% 3.8%
REIT average (market cap weighted) -12% 9.9% 5.7% 4.4% 4.6% 0.7 19% 4.0%
Singapore property and REITs
Developer average (market cap weighted) -21% 13.6% 9.4% 0.9% 1.9% 1.1 31% 4.9%
REIT average (market cap weighted) -4% -2.1% 1.4% 5.8% 6.0% 1.0 34% 6.1%
Malaysia property
Developer average (market cap weighted) -37% 39.2% 15.3% 2.4% 2.7% 1.4 19% 8.4%
REIT average (market cap weighted) 4% 6.4% 5.5% 4.8% 5.2% 1.0 22% 6.2%
Thailand property
Sector average (market cap weighted) NA 0.4% 17.7% 4.2% 4.5% 2.2 66% 17.7%
Philippines property
Sector average (market cap weighted) -26% 26.5% 14.2% 1.4% 1.8% 2.9 27% 12.8%
Indonesia property
Sector average (market cap weighted) -27% 48.3% -0.5% 1.2% 1.7% 2.0 3% 18.9%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Bloomberg. Pricing data as of 29 April 2014.
13
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Industry analysis
Demand drivers
We expect a rebound in housing pre-sales within the next two to three quarters.
Developers and banks agreed in 1QFY14 on a simple, yet effective mortgage
disbursement scheme for housing, in compliance with the new Bank Indonesia
regulations.
Housing construction progress and mortgage disbursements are now split into four
stages. The new mortgage disbursement scheme issued by Bank Indonesia in
September 2013, effective October 2013, is based on construction progress for any
individuals first mortgage, rather than an upfront lump sum payment to developers.
Table 7: Mortgage disbursement for housing
Developers deliver construction of Banks disburse mortgage principal portion
Post-1Q14 Foundation 50%
Roof 30%
House completion 10%
Change of ownership title 10%
Pre-3Q13 None 100%
Source: Company data.
Pre-sales declined in the past two quarters as developers prefer that housing buyers
pay using installments to developers, rather than mortgages, since September 2013.
Housing buyers are delaying purchases due to this payment method preference.
We believe the use of mortgages as a payment method should rise and contribute up
to 50% of developers pre-sales within the next two to three quarters. The use of
mortgages as a payment method for housing purchases declined to an average 10%
of total housing transactions in 4QFY13 and 1QFY14 from an average 55% prior to
the introduction of the new mortgage disbursement scheme.
Figure 18: Quarterly pre-sales (Rp tn)
Source: Company data.
Figure 19: BIs IDR intraday base lending rate
Source: Bloomberg.
We calculate that the national housing affordability ratio has been low since 2006,
suggesting positive support for housing demand in FY14 and FY15. We expect
mortgage rates to remain at 9%, near the record-low average of 8.5% in FY12.
Our definition of the housing affordability ratio is the proportion of household
income employed to service mortgages. The lower the ratio, the better affordability
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
8.0%
8.5%
9.0%
9.5%
10.0%
10.5%
11.0%
11.5%
Housing pre-sales expected to
rebound in next two to three
quarters
Supportive affordability
14
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
is. Aside from the mortgage rates assumed, we also assume three working persons
per household, a 70% loan-to-value with 15 years mortgage duration and an average
of 60-120 sqm houses.
Figure 20: National housing affordability ratio
Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Figure 21: Pre-sales growth*
Source: Company data, J.P. Morgan estimates. * For property companies under our coverage.
Figure 22: Change of employment in Indonesia (000s)
Source: CEIC.
Figure 23: Average YoY wage growth in Indonesia
Source: BPS, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Agreement on a mortgage disbursement scheme for apartment sales has yet to be
reached. We believe a solution can be reached by the end of 2014. We expect the
contribution of apartment pre-sales to total pre-sales to recover to 20% in 2015 from
an estimated 10% in FY14.
We also do not foresee a structural change in apartment demand near-term. An
estimated 50% of apartment demand should continue to be driven by end user
demand, with the remaining 50% investor-driven. We believe structural changes for
apartment demand in Indonesia, which is 95% dominated by apartments in Jakarta,
will emerge only when there is a meaningful progress on Jakarta MRT construction.
Table 8: Jakarta MRT construction schedule
MRT line Length of line (km) Target operation Current status
South-North 1 15.7 2018 Construction of 13
stations (6 underground
and 7 above ground)
South-North 2 8.1 2020 Completed due diligence
East West N/A 2027 Conducting due diligence
Source: www.jakartamrt.com.
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
(1,000)
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
No sign of near-term apartment
pre-sales rebound
15
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 24: Pre-sales, by type
Source: Company data.
We expect demand for lease retail floors to continue its healthy run since early 2013.
Pre-committed space in lease retail assets in Jakarta to date is high, with vacancy
rates remaining low, at below 5%. No new lease retail building permits have been
issued for Jakarta since late 2012, so there is no new supply of lease retail starting
2015.
There are several demand drivers for lease retail space, which supports our bullish
view on lease retail assets:
Foreign retailers expansion. Competition in the retail sector continues to
intensify, with more foreign companies trying to serve the large and young
population in Indonesia. The most recent foreign competition was Sephora from
the U.S., which plans to open in Kota Casablanca mall, Jakarta, this year.
J.P. Morgans ASEAN consumer analyst Princy Singh believes there is potential
for upward revisions in retailers capital expenditures once the election is over.
We expect new store space growth of 5% YoY in 2015 after a potential 20%
decline in 2014.
Domestic retailers same-store sales growth has recovered steadily after
bottoming in 1Q13. We expect a normalization of same-store sales growth
between 5% and 10%, depending on target consumer segments.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1Q
06
2Q
06
3Q
06
4Q
06
1Q
07
2Q
07
3Q
07
4Q
07
1Q
08
2Q
08
3Q
08
4Q
08
1Q
09
2Q
09
3Q
09
4Q
09
1Q
10
2Q
10
3Q
10
4Q
10
1Q
11
2Q
11
3Q
11
4Q
11
1Q
12
2Q
12
3Q
12
4Q
12
1Q
13
2Q
13
3Q
13
4Q
13
High-rise Non high-rise
Positive on Jakarta lease retail
demand over lease office
16
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 25: New store expansion plan growth (%)
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Figure 26: Same store sales growth*
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data. * Same-store sales growth of retail companies
under our coverage, excluding Ramayana (typically does not rent retail floor).
Lease office demand is likely to be negatively affected by the slowdown in
Indonesias economy, as well as lower business expansion demand prior to the
election wrap-up, in our view. We believe the appetite for strata office will continue
to be irrational, as it has always been, and provide support and reduce rental rate
volatility near-term.
Figure 27: Indonesia GDP growth and FDI trend
Source: Bloomberg.
Supply drivers
We believe the volume of housing development launches is likely to increase starting
2Q14, now that there is an agreement on mortgage disbursement stages for housing.
We see no reason why most developers will not be ready to launch more products in
2H14.
There is no inventory concern in the market because housing supply is determined
purely by developers pre-sales rates. Developers typically do not run the risk of
over-supply because pre-selling activities are conducted prior to construction.
The majority of property companies in Indonesia rely significantly on housing
development pre-sales to generate cash. Four out of five property companies under
our coverage are likely at net cash to equity. Election noise should start to abate in
October 2014, in our view, as soon as more clarity emerges on the shape of the new
government.
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E
Average new store space Y/Y growth, (RHS)
0%
100%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
Average
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
FDI in US$ millions (RHS) Real GDP YoY growth
Developers control supply;
expect more launches in 2H14
17
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 28: Indonesia property companies net cash (debt) to equity
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Table 9: Indonesia 2014 election schedule
7-9 May Legislative election final result announced
11-18 May Legislative seats allocation; Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates announced
June-September New legislative parliament members announced
9 July Presidential and Vice Presidential election; quick count of presidential election
July-October Induction of new legislative parliament members
October Induction of new President and Vice President, assuming no second-round election
October-November Presidential cabinet ministers announcement and induction, assuming no second-round
election
Source: www.pemilu.com,
Apartment developments in Jakarta, which represents around 95% of apartment
developments in the country, have gone under provincial government scrutiny.
Jakartas governor has been restricting building permit issuance for high-rise
buildings that do not follow the citys town planning since his term started in
October 2012.
We are positive on apartment selling prices and the lease retail rental outlook in 2015
due to the lack of new supply. The impact of the slowdown in building permits
issuance is likely to be most pronounced for lease retail, followed by apartment
supply in 2015 on, in our view.
We are neutral on the lease office rental outlook in 2015. The supply of lease offices
will be less affected, in our view. Some lease office development with older building
permits has recently been completed or has started construction, with target
completion scheduled to start from 2013.
Figure 29: Strata apartment (grade B+ and above) unsold rate Figure 30: Service apartment (grade B+ and above) vacancy rate
(0.5)
(0.4)
(0.3)
(0.2)
(0.1)
-
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
BSDE CTRA LPKR PWON SMRA
FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
High-rise building permits issue
Positive 2015 outlook for lease
retails rental and apartment pre-
sales
18
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Source: Real Estate Intelligence Service, JLL. Source: Real Estate Intelligence Service, JLL.
Figure 31: Lease retail (grade B+ and above) vacancy rate
Source: Real Estate Intelligence Service, JLL.
Figure 32: Lease office (grade B+ and above) vacancy rate
Source: Real Estate Intelligence Service, JLL.
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
19
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Co
mp
an
ies
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Summarecon
Initiation
Overweight
SMRA.JK, SMRA IJ
Replicating successful township model; initiate with
Overweight
Price: Rp1,115
Price Target: Rp1,900
Indonesia
Indonesia Research
Felicia Tandiyono AC
(62-21) 5291-8574
PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia
Aditya Srinath, CFA
(62-21) 5291-8573
PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia
Cusson Leung
(852) 2800-8526
J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited
Joy Wang
(65) 6882-2312
J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private
Limited
700
900
1,100
1,300
1,500
Rp
May-13 Aug-13 Nov-13 Feb-14 May-14
Price Performance
SMRA.JK share price (Rp)
JCI (rebased)
YTD 1m 3m 12m
Abs 36.0% -1.3% 18.0% -18.2%
Rel 23.6% -0.1% 9.1% -14.6%
Summarecon (Reuters: SMRA.JK, Bloomberg: SMRA IJ)
Rp in bn, year-end Dec FY12A FY13A FY14E FY15E FY16E
Revenue (Rp bn) 3,463 4,094 5,120 7,623 8,707
Net Profit (Rp bn) 798 1,102 1,192 1,602 1,667
EPS (Rp) 114.89 76.40 82.60 111.06 115.52
DPS (Rp) 11.50 21.50 19.10 20.65 33.32
Revenue growth (%) 46.8% 18.2% 25.1% 48.9% 14.2%
EPS growth (%) 101.4% (33.5%) 8.1% 34.5% 4.0%
ROCE 71.8% 61.8% 44.1% 48.0% 60.8%
ROE 26.1% 27.3% 24.4% 26.7% 23.0%
P/E (x) 9.7 14.6 13.5 10.0 9.7
P/BV (x) 2.1 3.5 2.9 2.3 2.0
EV/EBITDA (x) 11.0 7.6 18.1 15.8 15.8
Dividend Yield 1.0% 1.9% 1.7% 1.9% 3.0%
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Company Data
Shares O/S (mn) 14,427
Market Cap (Rp bn) 16,085.86
Market Cap ($ bn) 1.40
Price (Rp) 1,115
Date Of Price 07 May 14
Free Float(%) -
3M - Avg daily vol (mn) 27.58
3M - Avg daily val (Rp mn) 29,093.85
3M - Avg daily val ($ mn) 2.5
JCI 4862.07
Exchange Rate 11,519.41
Price Target End Date 30-Jun-15
See page 72 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the
firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor
in making their investment decision.
We initiate coverage of Summarecon (SMRA) with an OW rating and a
Jun-15 PT of Rp1,900. SMRA is trading at 54% and 59% discounts to our
FY14 and FY15 RNAV estimates, respectively. We are positive on
housing development and the Jakarta retail lease outlook. Our FY15E
RNAV for SMRA is 77% driven by housing development from its four
townships and 18% driven by its retail leases.
SMRAs business strategy. SMRAs management is preparing to
launch its fourth housing township by the end of 2014 and fifth township
in 2015. The company continues to replicate its successful strategy of
developing townships like its Kelapa Gading in North Jakarta to other
land banks. SMRA's malls anchor each of its township developments
and are likely to enjoy positive rental rate growth, on our estimates.
Positive on SMRA's strategy to deliver growth. We expect SMRAs
pre-sales momentum to be the best versus its peers, given the launch of
its fourth housing township, among other factors. We are also bullish on
its Jakarta malls rental rate outlook. We expect retail lease floor
expansion located in new townships to add contributions to the
companys growth in three to four years' time.
Key catalysts. The announcement of initial housing launches in the fourth
township, expected around 4Q14, will be key for the pre-sales growth
outlook in 2015-16. We believe continuously strong pre-sales growth in
the next few years is yet to be reflected in SMRAs share price.
Valuation and price target. We initiate coverage of Summarecon
(SMRA) with an OW rating. We set our PT at a 25% discount to our
Jun-15 RNAV. Our RNAV is calculated using DCF methodology for
development properties and applying cap rate for investment properties.
21
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Key catalyst for the stock price: Upside risks to our view: Downside risks to our view:
Positive pre-sales momentum in 1Q14
continues
Launch of fourth township, Bandung project,
scheduled in 1Q14
Lack of new mall supply in Jakarta starting
2015
Land or project acquisitions
Ability to pass on higher high-rise development
cost to buyers
Better-than-expected pre-sales from
development project launches
Town-planning permit issues
Scarcity of contractors to build high-rise
projects
Potential over-supply of residential units in
Bekasi
Key financial metrics FY13A FY14E FY15E FY16E Valuation and price target basis
Revenues (Rp bn) 4,094 5,120 7,623 8,707 Our PT of Rp1,900 is set at a 25% discount to our Jun-15 RNAV
estimate. Our PT assumes that SMRAs shares will trade one standard
deviation above the average sector discount to RNAV. Our RNAV
estimate is derived using a DCF methodology for development
properties assuming a 17.7% WACC and applying a single cap-rate for
investment properties assuming a 9.9% blended cap-rate.
Revenue growth (%) 18% 25% 49% 14%
EBITDA (Rp bn) 1,510 1,914 2,472 2,751
EBITDA margin (%) 37% 37% 32% 32%
Effective tax rate (%) 17% 18% 20% 21%
Net profit (Rp bn) 1,102 1,192 1,602 1,667
EPS (Rp) 76 83 111 116
EPS growth (%) 38% 8% 34% 4% Share Price discount to RNAV (Rp)
DPS (Rp) 22 19 21 33
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
-2 SD -1SD
SMRA share price Rp +1 SD
+2 SD
BVPS (Rp) 323 389 482 567
Operating cash flow (Rp bn) (1) 1,715 1,750 2,070
Free cash flow (Rp bn) (758) 639 230 276
Interest cover (X) 56 8 25 18
Net margin (%) 27% 23% 21% 19%
Sales/assets (X) 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5
Debt/equity (%) 0.54 0.69 0.47 0.34
Net debt/equity (%) (0.01) (0.04) (0.01) 0.03
ROE (%) 27% 24% 27% 23%
Key model assumptions FY13A FY14E FY15E FY16E
Housing ASP growth 49% 11% 0% 10%
Housing land sale growth -26% 12% 6% 11%
Mall average rental rate growth 6% 10% 16% 13%
Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates. Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates.
Sensitivity analysis RNAV EPS JPMe vs. consensus, change in estimates
Sensitivity to FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E EPS FY14E FY15E
1% chg in ASP growth (all segments) 5.9% 6.2% 0.7% 3.0% JPMe old NA NA
1% chg in volume sales grth (all segments) 4.0% 4.3% 0.1% 0.1% JPMe new 83 111
1% chg in rental rate grth (all segments) 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.9% % chg NA NA
Consensus 80 87
Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates. Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates.
Comparative metrics
Rating
Mkt Cap
RNAV
prem.(disc.) Inv.Prop./Gross RNAV P/E (development) YTD
$Mn FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E
BSDE N 2,371 -21% -24% 5% 6% 9.3 8.6 21%
CTRA OW 1,353 -53% -57% 4% 3% 8.5 7.6 37%
LPKR N 2,138 -8% -13% 11% 11% 12.8 21.3 18%
PWON N 1,460 -14% -22% 42% 45% 8.0 6.9 30%
SMRA OW 1,362 -54% -60% 19% 22% 10.6 10.0 40%
Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates. Prices are as of 5 May 2014
22
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Investment summary
We initiate coverage of SMRA with an Overweight rating and a Jun-15 PT of
Rp1,900. SMRA is our preferred stock in the Indonesia property sector. We
believe SMRAs share price is likely to outperform most, amid issues clouding the
broader Indonesia property sector. Our positive stance on SMRA is due to:
1. Best pre-sales momentum. 1QFY14 pre-sales grew 75% QoQ, while sector pre-
sales declined 59% QoQ. The launch of its fourth development in 4QFY14 will
be vital in contributing to FY14 and FY15 pre-sales growth. The agreement
between banks and developers on the mortgage fund disbursement scheme for
housing development should further support SMRAs pre-sales, in our view.
2. Bullish on SMRA's retail lease assets. We believe Kelapa Gading mall in
Jakarta will benefit from the scarcity of new retail lease floor space in 2015.
SMRAs Serpong township will add a new leased commercial area, adding 20%
to retail lease space in the township. The new Bekasi mall, opened mid-2013,
should provide a higher contribution to total revenue in 2014, given strong
occupancy at 92% as of December 2013.
3. Attractive valuation. SMRA last traded at a 59% discount to 2015E NAV vs the
sector at a 33% discount. SMRAs share price has mostly underperformed the
sector index in the past 12 months, except for April 2014 when 1QFY14 pre-sales
were announced. We believe SMRA can outperform the sector index over the next
12 months, given its property segment exposure and township expansion plans.
Investment risks
The key risks for SMRA mainly come from political and regulatory events which
partly influence economic outcomes and sentiment towards the property sector
(please refer to the sector section for more details). The two other main risks to our
investment thesis are land or project acquisition and town-planning permit issues.
Management is searching for potential land bank or project acquisitions, preferably
in Jakarta, Greater Jakarta or nearby cities, to replicate its successful township
development further. Such acquisitions historically have added 20% upside to NAV
within the following two to three years.
Potential delays in launching SMRA's fourth township would likely be related to
town-planning permit issues, in our view. Management is, however, confident that
this risk is under control. Any delay from its scheduled 4QFY14 launch could create
up to 5% downside risk to our RNAV estimates for each delayed quarter.
Valuation and share price analysis
Our PT of Rp1,900 is set at a 25% discount to our Jun-15 estimated RNAV. We apply
a 25% discount to our June 2015E RNAV to reflect sector sentiment in 12 months
time. We argue property companies with high exposure to development properties
should trade one standard deviation above the sector average discount to RNAV.
Company description
SMRA was established in Nov 1975,
started operations in 1976 and was
listed in Aug 1996. SMRA is owned by
the Nagaria family. Members of
founding family are also currently
members of SMRAs Board of
Directors. SMRAs main land bank is
located in Serpong, west Greater
Jakarta. SMRAs current main projects
are its retail lease in flagship land
bank, Kelapa Gading, North Jakarta,
and residential township projects in
Serpong and Bekasi, west and east
Greater Jakarta, respectively.
Figure 33: RNAV 2015E breakdown
Low-
rise,
77%
High-
rise,
1%
Office,
1%
Retail,
18%Hotels
, 4%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
Upside risks
Downside risks
PT at sector mean +1SD
23
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Our RNAV forecast for SMRA is calculated using the following assumptions:
DCF methodology for development properties. We assume a 17.7% WACC on
net cash flow after sales tax generated from development activities. Our WACC
rate assumes:
30:70 debt to equity, which reflects what we believe to be the comfortable level
of leverage for SMRAs management
8% risk free rate, which is in line with Indonesias 10-year bond yield
1.6x beta, which is the historical two-year average beta
5% long-term growth rate, in line with the long-term inflation rate in Indonesia
Single cap-rate for investment properties. We apply a 9.9% blended cap-rate on
net effective rent. Our blended cap-rate is calculated from weighted-average of:
8% cap-rate for lease office, in line with current cap-rate for grade B offices
10% cap-rate for lease retail, in line with current cap-rate for grade-A malls
10% cap-rate for hotel, in line with current cap-rate for grade B hotels
Table 10: SMRA RNAV breakdown
Rp bn 2014E 2015E
Development properties 27,856 30,481
Low-rise 27,717 30,258
High-rise 139 222
Investment properties 6,739 8,603
Office 193 208
Retail 5,420 6,855
Hotels 1,126 1,540
Others - -
Gross Asset Value 34,595 39,084
Net cash (debt) + minority adj. 120 (61)
RNAV 34,714 39,024
RNAV per share 2,406 2,705
Gross RNAV breakdown by segment
Low-rise 80% 77%
High-rise 0% 1%
Office 1% 1%
Retail 16% 18%
Hotels 3% 4%
Others 0% 0%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
Risks to our price target
Our RNAV is largely driven by SMRAs housing development. A delay or failure in
the launch of any housing projects, existing or new townships, creates a downside
risk to our price target. Better-than-expected pre-sales achieved from launches within
the next 12 months would be positive for our RNAV FY15 estimates.
Table 11: SMRA's PT sensitivity to change in valuation assumptions
+/- 1.0% change Change in TP
Rf -/+ 4.4%
Beta -/+ 0.3%
LT g +/- 1.9%
WACC -/+ 6.6%
Cap rate -/+ 1.6%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
24
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Share price analysis
SMRA share price has underperformed the JCI by 13% over the past one year and is
relatively in line with the property sector index performance. SMRA's stock
underperformance to the JCI was due to general weakness in the property sector
rather than due to company-specific reasons, in our view.
Property sector weakness in 3QFY13 and 4QFY13 was mainly due to the negative
impact from BI's LTV policy issued in September 2013. Pre-sales momentum started
to slow in 4QFY13 and slowed significantly in 1QFY14.
Table 12: Sector news events
3QFY13 BI issued new LTV requirement for mortgage & more restrictive mortgage fund disbursement
4QFY13 Data released on property sector pre-sales +85% QoQ in 3QFY13
1QFY14
Data released on property sector pre-sales -12% QoQ in 4QFY13
The scheme on housing mortgage disbursement was agreed between banks and developers
Jokowi was announced as a presidential candidate, widely seen to be reformist on infrastructure
matters among others
2QFY14 Data released on property sector pre-sales -59% QoQ in 1QFY14
Jakarta provincial government is formulating new building permit policy
Source: J.P. Morgan, Company data, Bloomberg
The period when SMRAs share price underperformed the property sector index the
most was in 3QFY13. We think this is because SMRAs pre-sales growth was
weaker than the sector, on a YoY and QoQ basis.
Figure 34: SMRA share price performance versus JCI and Property sector index
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
SMRA JCI index Property sector index
3QFY13 4QFY13 1QFY14 2QFY14...
Source: Bloomberg.
25
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 35: Pre-sales growth YoY
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Sector pre-sales SMRA pre-sales
Source: Company data.
Figure 36: SMRA's RNAV discount to share price
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
-1 SD SMRA share price Rp +1 SD
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Company analysis
Management strategy
SMRA's management is focused on replicating its successful flagship project,
Summarecon Kelapa Gading township, into other land bank locations. Management
is aware and has focused great effort in building Summarecon as a brand for property
buyers in Jakarta and Greater Jakarta.
SMRA also owns and manages retail leases in each township, which contributes a
steady recurring income for the company. Its retail lease in Jakarta is known as one
of the malls with the high foot-traffic during weekdays and weekends. Management
is charging close to grade A+ mall rates in prime CBD area for Summarecon Kelapa
Gading mall as a result. Management continues its retail lease expansion to other
land bank. Summarecon Mal Serpong has been garnering good credibility with
tenants amid rising competition in the area since it opened three years ago.
Figure 37: SMRA RNAV breakdown in 2013
79%
5%
1% 14%
2% 0%
Low-rise High-rise Office Retail Hotels Others
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Figure 38: SMRA RNAV breakdown in 2018E
65%
11%
0%
20%
4% 0%
Low-rise High-rise Office Retail Hotels Others
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
Focused on replication strategy
26
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Location exposure
SMRAs property portfolio is mainly located around Jakarta and Greater Jakarta. The
fourth development will be located in Bandung, outside of Jakarta and Greater
Jakarta, around 150 km from Jakarta or around 130 km from Greater Jakarta.
Figure 39: Map of SMRA's project locations
Source: Company data.
Financial analysis
Income statement
We forecast 38% pre-sales growth for SMRA in 2014. Pre-sales for SMRAs low-
rise development are typically booked as revenue after 1.5 years onwards, upon
house handover. Pre-sales for SMRAs high-rise development are typically booked
as revenue based on the percentage of construction completion.
Two main revenue drivers for SMRA are housing developments and retail leases. We
estimate around 50% of housing developments to continue to be mainly driven by
pre-sales from Serpong and Bekasi townships. Around 50% of retail lease revenue is
driven by Mal Kelapa Gading, SMRA's first mall.
27
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 40: Pre-sales trend
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
SMRA Quarterly pre-sales (Rp bn) Pre-sales growth YoY
Source: Company data.
Figure 41: Revenue breakdown
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E
Development Investment
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates., Company data
We forecast gross profit margin to decline starting 2014 as pre-sales being booked
are of newer housing and apartment projects. We expect both projects to book lower
margin due to recently higher construction cost. Construction costs, especially for
high-rise developments, have been on the rise in the past 12 months.
Table 13: Margin and growth
FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E FY16E
GPM 46% 53% 60% 52% 51%
OPM 29% 33% 34% 28% 27%
EBITDA margin 33% 37% 37% 32% 32%
NIM 23% 27% 26% 22% 20%
Sales growth 47% 18% 25% 49% 14%
COGS growth 43% 4% 6% 79% 15%
EBITDA growth 71% 32% 27% 29% 11%
EBIT growth 79% 33% 28% 25% 8%
NI growth 104% 38% 22% 22% 7%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Balance sheet
We do not foresee balance sheet issues for SMRA. Current project pipelines should
be sufficiently financed by internal funding for the next 12 months, on our estimates.
We think the 2013 bond issuance and the April 2014s loan facility signed were
timely. Net cash build-up in 2014 is likely to decline in 2015 and 2016 as cash is
deployed for land acquisitions, apartment construction working capital and
investment property construction.
SMRA may need to seek external funding in 2016 if there is a sizeable land bank or
project acquisition opportunity within the next 12 months, in our opinion. This is
especially true if the acquisition pushes net gearing levels to above 0.3x, in our view.
28
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Figure 42: Net gearing (x)
(0.05)
-
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
'12 '13 '14E '15E '16E
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Figure 43: Net cash/debt (Rp bn)
(1,500)
(1,000)
(500)
-
500
1,000
1,500
'12 '13 '14E '15E '16E
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Figure 44: Dilution history
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
Basic EPS Fully diluted EPS
Source: Company data.
Cash flow
We estimate around one-third of 50% of SMRAs capex within the next three years
is allocated for land acquisition and preparation in fourth and potentially fifth
township in Bogor, Greater Jakarta. Another one-third of SMRA's capex is likely to
be spent on its investment property pipeline, i.e. commercial building in Serpong and
4-star hotel in Kelapa Gading.
Table 14: Cash flow key items
FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E FY16E
CAPEX (Rp bn) (658) (782) (1,261) (1,599) (1,912)
CAPEX/Sales 19% 19% 25% 21% 22%
FCF 673 (758) 639 230 276
CFO 1,310 (1) 1,715 1,750 2,070
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
29
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Summarecon: Summary of FinancialsIncome Statement Cash flow statement
Rp in billions, year end Dec FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E FY16E Rp in billions, year end Dec FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E FY16E
Revenues 3,463 4,094 5,120 7,623 8,707 EBIT 1,011 1,347 1,722 2,153 2,327
% change Y/Y 46.8% 18.2% 25.1% 48.9% 14.2% Depr. & amortization 132 163 193 319 424
EBITDA 1,143 1,510 1,914 2,472 2,751 Change in working capital 499 (1,243) 299 (212) (67)
% change Y/Y 70.6% 32.2% 26.7% 29.1% 11.3% Taxes - - - - -
EBIT 1,011 1,347 1,722 2,153 2,327 Cash flow from operations 1,310 (1) 1,715 1,750 2,070
% change Y/Y 79.1% 33.3% 27.8% 25.0% 8.1%
EBIT Margin 29.2% 32.9% 33.6% 28.2% 26.7% Capex (658) (782) (1,261) (1,599) (1,912)
Net Interest (25) (27) (227) (98) (150) Disposal/(purchase) 1 2 0 0 0
Earnings before tax 986 1,319 1,495 2,055 2,177 Net Interest (25) (27) (227) (98) (150)
% change Y/Y 85.8% 33.8% 13.3% 37.4% 6.0% Other (104) (243) 0 0 0
Tax (194) (224) (272) (412) (465) Free cash flow 653 (781) 454 151 158
as % of EBT 19.7% 16.9% 18.2% 20.0% 21.3%
Net income (reported) 798 1,102 1,192 1,602 1,667 Equity raised/(repaid) 527 0 0 0 0
% change Y/Y 103.5% 38.1% 8.1% 34.5% 4.0% Debt raised/(repaid) (13) 1,356 1,394 (616) (535)
Shares outstanding 6,944 14,427 14,427 14,427 14,427 Other 41 92 0 0 0
EPS (reported) 114.89 76.40 82.60 111.06 115.52 Dividends paid (158) (310) (276) (298) (481)
% change Y/Y 101.4% (33.5%) 8.1% 34.5% 4.0% Beginning cash 1,496 2,428 2,545 4,117 3,355
Ending cash 2,428 2,545 4,117 3,355 2,497
DPS 11.50 21.50 19.10 20.65 33.32
Balance sheet Ratio Analysis
Rp in billions, year end Dec FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E FY16E Rp in billions, year end Dec FY12 FY13 FY14E FY15E FY16E
Cash and cash equivalents 2,428 2,545 4,117 3,355 2,497 EBITDA margin 33.0% 36.9% 37.4% 32.4% 31.6%
Accounts receivable 106 179 224 333 380 Operating margin 29.2% 32.9% 33.6% 28.2% 26.7%
Inventories 2,820 3,058 3,108 2,303 1,458 Net margin 23.0% 26.9% 23.3% 21.0% 19.1%
Others 491 674 674 674 674
Current assets 5,846 6,456 8,123 6,664 5,009
. Sales per share growth 45.3% (43.1%) 25.1% 48.9% 14.2%
LT investments 597 844 844 844 844 Sales growth 46.8% 18.2% 25.1% 48.9% 14.2%
Net fixed assets 1,884 3,210 4,436 5,665 7,305 Net profit growth 103.5% 38.1% 8.1% 34.5% 4.0%
Total Assets 10,876 13,659 16,394 16,215 16,048 EPS growth 101.4% (33.5%) 8.1% 34.5% 4.0%
.
Liabilities Interest coverage (x) 46.6 55.5 8.5 25.2 18.4
Short-term loans 444 244 221 140 175
Payables 184 63 63 63 63 Net debt to equity (34.2%) (0.9%) (4.0%) (1.1%) 3.0%
Others 4,569 4,735 4,971 4,426 3,907 Sales/assets 36.5% 33.4% 34.1% 46.8% 54.0%
Total current liabilities 5,197 5,042 5,255 4,629 4,146 Assets/equity 310.9% 304.0% 307.4% 271.8% 222.7%
. ROE 26.1% 27.3% 24.4% 26.7% 23.0%
Long-term debt 678 2,257 3,674 3,139 2,569 ROCE 71.8% 61.8% 44.1% 48.0% 60.8%
Other liabilities 1,185 1,702 1,859 1,496 1,150
Total Liabilities 7,061 9,001 10,788 9,264 7,865
Shareholder's equity 3,815 4,658 5,606 6,951 8,183
BVPS (Rp) 528.93 322.85 388.56 481.80 567.18
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.
www.jpmorganmarkets.com
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Ciputra Development
Initiation
Overweight
CTRA.JK, CTRA IJ
Housing focus; initiate with OverweightPrice: Rp1,020
Price Target: Rp1,700
Indonesia
Property
Felicia Tandiyono AC
(62-21) 5291-8574
PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia
Aditya Srinath, CFA
(62-21) 5291-8573
PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia
Cusson Leung
(852) 2800-8526
J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited
Joy Wang
(65) 6882-2312
J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private
Limited
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Rp
May-13 Aug-13 Nov-13 Feb-14 May-14
Price Performance
CTRA.JK share price (Rp)
JCI (rebased)
YTD 1m 3m 12m
Abs 30.8% -13.6% 10.3% -25.0%
Rel 18.4% -12.4% 1.4% -21.4%
Ciputra Development (Reuters: CTRA.JK, Bloomberg: CTRA IJ)
Rp in bn, year-end Dec FY12A FY13A FY14E FY15E FY16E
Revenue (Rp bn) 3,323 5,077 7,806 9,989 11,842
Net Profit (Rp bn) 589 977 1,353 1,685 1,766
EPS (Rp) 38.84 64.40 89.21 111.10 116.42
DPS (Rp) 7.00 12.00 19.32 19.32 26.76
Revenue growth (%) 52.5% 52.8% 53.7% 28.0% 18.6%
EPS growth (%) 81.4% 65.8% 38.5% 24.5% 4.8%
ROCE 71.2% 65.0% 89.0% 139.0% 196.9%
ROE 11.0% 16.3% 19.6% 20.7% 18.6%
P/E (x) 26.3 15.8 11.4 9.2 8.8
P/BV (x) 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.0
EV/EBITDA (x) 12.6 7.7 12.3 10.6 10.3
Dividend Yield 0.7% 1.2% 1.9% 1.9% 2.6%
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Company Data
Shares O/S (mn) 15,166
Market Cap (Rp bn) 15,469.14
Market Cap ($ bn) 1.34
Price (Rp) 1,020
Date Of Price 07 May 14
Free Float(%) -
3M - Avg daily vol (mn) 32.20
3M - Avg daily val (Rp mn) 33,676.19
3M - Avg daily val ($ mn) 2.9
JCI 4862.07
Exchange Rate 11,519.41
Price Target End Date 30-Jun-15
See page 72 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the
firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor
in making their investment decision.
We initiate coverage of Ciputra Development (CTRA) with an OW rating
and Jun-15 price target of Rp1,700, at a 25% discount to our RNAV
estimate. CTRA last traded at a 55% and 58% discount to our FY14 and
FY15 RNAV estimates, respectively. We are positive on the housing
development and Jakarta lease retail outlook. 95% of our FY15E RNAV
comes from housing development at residential projects in 33 cities across
Indonesia, and less than 1% from lease retail assets in Jakarta.
CTRAs business strategy. Management plans to launch 11 new joint
ventures (JVs), three of which will be located in Jakarta. Its JV strategy
implemented since 2011 has been mainly to develop housing in tier-2
and tier-3 cities across Indonesia. The housing JV strategy has brought
strong pre-sales growth for CTRA since 2011.
Positive on CTRAs strategy. Among Indonesian developers, a JV
strategy is unique to CTRA, and allows faster pre-sales activity without
much capex. CTRAs Jakarta apartment JVs in 2014 are unlikely to be
as successful as its housing JVs, given mortgage disbursement and
building permit issues. However, CTRA does not fully own the
apartment projects, limiting downside risk potential.
Main event to watch. CTRAs share price has underperformed the JCI
and property sector index, particularly since September 2013, due to BI
LTV policy. We believe any sign of a turnaround in CTRAs monthly
pre-sales in 2Q or 3Q FY14 will be positively received as it suggests two
things: 1) the mortgage issue no longer weighs on pre-sales activity, and
2) returned confidence in launching projects after the election.
Valuation and price target. We initiate on CTRA with an OW rating
and Jun-15 PT of Rp1,700, at a 25% discount to our RNAV estimate.
Our RNAV estimate uses DCF to value development properties and
applies a cap rate for investment properties.
31
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Key catalysts for the stock price: Upside risks to our view: Downside risks to our view:
Turnaround in monthly pre-sales figures
Mixed-use project launches in Jakarta
Mortgage fund disbursement scheme
agreement for apartment projects
Better-than-expected pre-sales and
profitability contribution from joint venture
projects
Ability to pass on higher construction costs
for planned high-rise projects in Jakarta
Potential further increase in stake of
subsidiaries, Ciputra Surya and/or Ciputra
Property
Jakarta high-rise building permit issues
Expansion into budget hotels
Clinic/hospital development in owned townships
Key financial metrics FY13A FY14E FY15E FY16E Valuation and price target basis
Revenues (Rp bn) 5,077 7,806 9,989 11,842 Our Jun-15 PT of Rp1,700 is at a 25% discount to our Jun-15 RNAV
estimate. Our PT assumes that CTRA will trade at one standard deviation
above the average sector discount to RNAV. Our RNAV estimate uses
DCF to value development properties assuming a 19.5% WACC and
applying a blended cap-rate of 10.7% for investment properties.
Revenue growth (%) 53% 54% 28% 19%
EBITDA (Rp bn) 1,810 2,771 3,380 3,670
EBITDA margin (%) 36% 35% 34% 31%
Effective tax rate (%) 17% 16% 17% 16%
Net profit (Rp bn) 977 1,353 1,685 1,766
EPS (Rp) 64 89 111 116
EPS growth (%) 66% 39% 25% 5% Share price discount to RNAV (Rp)
DPS (Rp) 12 19 19 27
(1,000)
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
-2 SD -1 SD
CTRA share price Rp +1 SD
+2 SD
BVPS (Rp) 644 756 900 1,050
Operating cash flow (Rp bn) 308 5,028 5,194 6,532
Free cash flow (Rp bn) (1,301) 2,856 2,068 2,608
Interest cover (X) (34) 25 (662) (27)
Net margin (%) 19% 17% 17% 15%
Sales/assets (X) 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
Debt/equity (%) 0.28 0.17 0.12 0.06
Net debt/equity (%) (0.08) (0.28) (0.37) (0.46)
ROE (%) 16% 20% 21% 19%
Key model assumptions FY13A FY14E FY15E FY16E
ASP growth for projects in JKT and G.JKT -34% 10% 10% 10%
Land sales growth for projects in JKT and
G.JKT 202% 5% 5% 5%
Mall average rental rate growth 24% 9% 9% 9%
Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates. Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates.
Sensitivity analysis RNAV EPS JPMe vs. consensus, change in estimates
Sensitivity to FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E EPS FY14E FY15E
1% chg in ASP growth (all segments) 8.2% 9.3% 0.9% 1.2% JPMe old NA NA
1% chg in volume sales growth (all
segments) 3.5% 4.1% 0.1% 0.1% JPMe new 89 111
1% chg in rental rate growth (all segments) 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% % chg NA NA
Consensus 79 97
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan.
Comparative metrics
Rating
Mkt Cap
RNAV
prem.(disc.) Inv. Prop./Gross RNAV P/E (development) YTD
$MM FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E FY14E FY15E
BSDE N 2,339 -22% -25% 5% 6% 9.2 8.4 19%
CTRA OW 1,330 -53% -57% 4% 3% 8.5 7.6 35%
LPKR N 2,124 -9% -13% 11% 11% 12.7 21.1 16%
PWON N 1,514 -11% -19% 42% 45% 8.3 7.1 34%
SMRA OW 1,372 -54% -59% 19% 22% 10.7 10.0 40%
Source: Bloomberg, Company and J.P. Morgan estimates. Prices are as of 5 May 2014
32
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Investment summary
We initiate on CTRA with an Overweight rating and Jun-15 PT of Rp1,700. CTRA
is our second-most preferred stock in the Indonesia property sector, after
Summarecon (SMRA). We believe CTRA will outperform, despite issues clouding
the Indonesia property sector. Our positive stance on CTRA is due to:
1. Turnaround in pre-sales. We expect CTRAs pre-sales to recover from the 1Q
FY14 low in the next few quarters. Housing buyers delay their purchases when
mortgages were not CTRAs preferred payment method in 4Q FY13 and 1Q
FY14. We believe CTRA can realize the delayed pre-sales now that the mortgage
disbursement scheme has been addressed.
2. Expansion through its JV strategy. CTRA continues to monetize its strong
housing brand nationally by inviting JV partners, who are land bank owners,
since 2011. This strategy supports a higher pre-sales growth outlook without
requiring intensive capital expenditure. We believe this JV strategy, which is
unique among Indonesian developers, was made possible by CTRAs founders
prominence in the Indonesia property sector and the companys position as one of
the oldest developers in the country.
3. Attractive valuation. CTRA last traded at a 58% discount to our 2015 RNAV
estimate, versus the sectors 34% discount. CTRAs share price typically leads
that of other property companies during the turning point of sentiment towards
the Indonesia property sector. We believe this is because CTRAs property
portfolio serves all consumer segments across many cities in Indonesia.
Investment risks
Key risks for CTRA mainly come from political and regulatory events which partly
influence the economic outcome and sentiment towards the property sector (please
refer to our sector report for more details). There are two other main risks to our
CTRA investment thesis, i.e. higher pre-sales and profitability contribution from JV
projects and its Jakarta apartment projects building permit issues.
We see 12% upside risk to our RNAV estimate if housing sold in its JV projects can
deliver the same gross margin as those in its own projects. Many expect CTRAs
gross margin from development property to decline because of the nature of the JV
projects. JV partners typically share 30% of revenue, or 50% of projects profit as a
form of compensation for the land bank provided.
We see 5% downside risk to our RNAV estimate if there is a delay in Jakarta
apartment development projects launching this year. Delays in Jakarta apartment
projects could be caused by: 1) no agreement on the mortgage disbursement scheme
for apartments, and 2) high-rise building permit issues in Jakarta. To date, only one
of the three CTRA JVs in the Jakarta apartment market is close to obtaining a
building permit.
Company description
CTRA was established on
October 1981, started operating
in 1984, and was listed on the
Jakarta Stock Exchange in
January 1994. CTRA is owned by
the Ciputra family. Members of
the founding family are currently
also members of CTRA's Board
of Directors. CTRAs main land
bank is located in west and
south east Greater Jakarta.
CTRA currently operates 69
projects in 33 cities across
Indonesia
Figure 45: 2015E RNAV breakdown
Low-
rise,
95%
High-
rise,
2%Office,
0%
Retail,
2%Hotels
, 1%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
Upside risks
Downside risks
33
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Valuation and share price analysis
We set our Jun-15 price target of Rp1,700 at a 25% discount to our RNAV estimate.
The 25% discount is to reflect our expectation of sector sentiment in 12 months time.
We argue that property companies with high exposure to development properties will
trade at one standard deviation above the sectors average discount to RNAV.
We estimate RNAV using:
DCF methodology for development properties. We assume a 19.5% WACC on
net cash flow after sales tax generated from development activities. Our WACC
rate assumes:
15:85 debt to equity, which reflects what we believe to be the comfortable level
of leverage for CTRAs management
8% risk-free rate, which is in line with Indonesias 10-year bond yield
1.6x beta, which is the historical two-year average beta
5% long-term growth rate, which is in line with the long-term inflation rate in
Indonesia
Single cap-rate for investment properties. We apply a 10.7% blended cap-rate on
net effective rent. Our blended cap-rate is calculated from the weighted average
of:
7% cap-rate for lease office, in line with the current cap-rate for grade A offices
11% cap-rate for lease retail, in line with the current cap-rate for grade B malls
10% cap-rate for hotel, in line with the current cap-rate for grade B hotels.
Table 15: CTRA: RNAV breakdown
Rp B 2014E 2015E
Development properties 32,867 34,581
Low-rise 31,233 33,997
High-rise 1,634 584
Investment properties 1,253 1,229
Office - -
Retail 947 833
Hotels 306 396
Others - -
Gross Asset Value 34,120 35,810
Net cash (debt) + minority adj. (823) 166
NAV 33,297 35,975
NAV per share 2,196 2,372
Gross NAV breakdown by segment
Low-rise 92% 95%
High-rise 5% 2%
Office 0% 0%
Retail 3% 2%
Hotels 1% 1%
Others 0% 0%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
34
Asia Pacific Equity Research
08 May 2014
Felicia Tandiyono
(62-21) 5291-8574
Risks to our price target
Our RNAV estimate is largely driven by CTRAs housing developments. A delay or
failure in the launch of any housing projects, in existing or new townships, is a
downside risk to our price target. A better-than-expected pre-sales achieved from
launches within the next 12 months will be positive for CTRAs RNAV.
Table 16: CTRA: PT sensitivity to changes in valuation assumptions
+/- 1.0% change Change in TP
Rf -/+ 4.4%
Beta -/+ 0.6%
LT g +/- 2.3%
WACC -/+ 1.6%
Cap rate -/+ 0.1%
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
Share price analysis
CTRAs share price performance has ge