July Sept02

7/28/2019 July Sept02

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/july-sept02 1/12

DOEACC Volume 10 No.3 QUARTERLY JULY – SETPEMBER 2002

CONTENTS

Page Nos.

♦ About this Issue 1

♦ Examinations

q Status of July 2002

Examinations 2

q Date Sheet for January

2003 Examinations 10

♦ Accreditation

q Monitoring of the Institutes 2 - 4

q Introduction of Variable

Accreditation Fee 5 - 7♦ Global Implementation

q DOEACC Overseas – Singapore

& Uzbekistan 8

♦ Interface with Institutes,

Students & Awareness Creation

q 8th DOEACC Annual Review

Workshop 8 - 9

♦ Registration

q Rejection of Registration

Forms 10

About this Issue

J uly 2002 Examinat ions: DOEACC O/A/B & C LevelExaminations were conducted at 131 centres all over

the country during July 13 - 23, 2002 successfully.

About 82,480 candidates applied, out of which

81,337 were found to be eligible for the examination

and were issued admit cards. The results of

examinations for all the four levels were declared on

7th September 2002 (O Level), 14th September 2002

(A Level) and 25th September 2002 (B & C Levels)

respectively on DOEACC Website:

www.doeacc.org.in, which were accessed by the

candidates on query basis.

J anuar y 2 003 Examinat ions: The schedule for the

next (25th) DOEACC Examinations to be held in

January 2003 in respect of O/A/B & C Levels was

announced in the leading newspapers through out

the country in last week of August 2002. This issue

gives the Date Sheet for the said Examination for

the convenience of Students and Institutes.

Variable Accredit at ion Fee: DOEACC has

introduced Variable Accreditation Fee and

contribution of Awareness Creation Fund w.e.f.January 2003 Exams. Some clarifications are being

provided through this Newsletter, based upon the

feed-back received from a few Institutes in this

regard.

Dr. P.N. Gupta

Executive Director

N E W S L E T T E R

DOEACC Society(An autonomous body of Department of Information Technology,

Ministry of Communications & Information Technology,

Government of India)

Electronics Niketan, 6 CGO Complex, New Delhi – 110 003

Tel: 011-4363330/1/2; 4366577/79/80

Fax: 91-11-4363335E-mail: [email protected]

Web: www.doeacc.org.in

7/28/2019 July Sept02


2

** EXAMINATIONS

Status of July 2002 Examinations

The 24th

DOEACC Examinations at O/A/B/C Levelswere conducted at 131 centres from 13

thJuly 2002

to 23rd July 2002. 82,480 candidates applied for thesaid examination out of which 81,337 were foundeligible and results were declared on 7

thand 14

th

September 2002 for O & A Levels and 25th

September 2002 for B & C Levels on DOEACCWebsite: www.doeacc.org.in

DOEACC July 2002 ExaminationModule/Paper Candidates (Nos.)

Level Applied Appeared Passed Pass % ModuleCandidates

O 104721 88735 41463 46.73

A 88917 70348 35333 50.23

B 49342 38569 16394 42.51

C 2057 818 326 39.85

** ACCREDITATION

Monitoring of the Institutes

DOEACC aims to provide an ideal learningenvironment for the students undergoing training inthe institutions duly authorized by DOEACC Society.For the effective implementation of the training

programmes under the DOEAC Scheme, informationneeds to be collected by the DOEACC experts onvarious aspects of the learning environmentprevailing in the institutions to get a clear picture of the status of quality of education and training beingimparted by theses institutions in the non-formalsector of IT education. Towards this objective,DOEAC Society has initiated the process of monitoring the institutes authorized to conductDOEACC Courses by organizing visits of experts tothese institutes to assess them periodically.

In the first phase of this process, around 50

accredited institutes of Delhi Region and 20institutes in Southern region have been visited.

In the second phase, institutes in Rajasthan, Punjaband J & K are being planned to be monitored.

As brought out that the Society has alreadyintroduced the monitoring system to ensure qualityeducation & training by the institutes, based uponwhich an institute is being rated as Excellent/Very

Good/Good/Satisfactory/Poor on a scale of 0-200 asunder:

Sl. No. Points Rating

1. 176 and above Excellent

2. 151 to 175 Very Good

3. 126 to 150 Good4. 101 to 125 Satisfactory

5. 100 and below Poor

This rating for an Institute will be valid for the periodof Provisional/Full Accreditation and be reviewedperiodically, so that an institute makes efforts either to maintain or improve upon its earlier rating.

Norms and Standards for rating of the institutionsadopted during monitoring visits are given below inthe Monitoring Visit Report Preforma. Once themonitoring visits in respect of all the institutions arecomplete, these ratings would be placed on theWebsite of the Society.

INSTITUTE’S MONITORING VISIT REPORT(Confidential)

1. Institution Name & Address:2. ACCR No.: O

ABC

3. Name of the Convenor Name of the Member Expert No. Expert No.

4. Date of visit

5. Duration of visit (hrs. to hrs.)6. Observation summary in lieu to increase or decrease in

number of all the facilities since accreditation of a course:

Maximum Marks (10)

6.1 Class Room/Lecture RoomDistrib. Marksof marks Allotted

1. Seating arrangement in the ClassRoom 2 ----------

2. Cleanliness of the class-room 2 ----------3. Availability and usage of Teaching

Aids 4 ----------

4. Level of comfort for the studentand teacher 2 ----------

Total ______

6.2 Laboratories (30)1. Seating arrangement in the lab 3 -----------

2. Quality and adequecy of H/w andS/w 5 -----------

3. Licensed S/w for DOEACC

Courses 8 -----------4. Stand-by arrangements 3 -----------5. No. of students per terminal 3 ----------- (recommended two/terminals)

6. Cleanliness of the lab 2 ----------

2

7/28/2019 July Sept02


3

7. Accessibility of the lab facilitiesbeyond practical hours (mayverify from lab register) 4 ----------

Total ______

6.3 Library (10)

1. Adequacy of Library 2 ----------

2. Accessibility of books andJournals 2 ----------

3. Quality of arrangements in theLibrary 2 ----------

4. Organization and procedures

available for the usage of libraryfacilities 2 ----------

5. % of students using library

facility (verify from records) 2 ----------Total ______

6.4 Faculty : (Any change in the faculty since gettingaccreditation) (30)

1. Adequacy of competent faculty 6 ----------

2. Communication3. Inadequacies of the faculty 5 ----------4. Updated knowledge in the relevant

Subject 7 ----------5. Motivation and interest level in

Improving the learning environment 5 ----------

6. Faculty Retention 3 ---------7. Participation in train the Trainer

Programme 4 ---------

Total ______

6.5 Administration (25)

1. Maintenance of the log book for all equipment 2 ---------

2. Availability of trained staff for

Maintenance 5 ----------3. System of in-house test to

Monitor the progress of students

Whether the systems needsImprovement 2 ----------

4. Mapping of resources 2 ----------

5. Project support extended by theInstitute to their students 4 ---------

6. Monitoring of Training programs 2 ---------

7. Financial Standing 4 ---------8. Record keeping of its drawbacks/

Suggested area of improvement as

Communicated by DOEACC 2 ----------9. Organizing Guest Lectures 2 ----------

Total _______

6.6 Performance at Examinations (20)1. Maintenance of all previous statistics 4 ----------

(Module-wise)

2. Improvement in the last exam 5 ----------3. % of Drop-Outs 3 ----------

4. Assignments provided to thestudents 8 ----------

Total ______

6.7 Placement (5)1. Efforts made by the institute to give

Placement assistance to the

DOEACC qualifiers 2 ----------2. Professional practice 1 ----------3. Maintenance of placement record 2 ----------

Total _______

6.8 Publicity / Promotional Efforts (10)1. Banner of conducting DOEACC

accredited course for specified level

is displayed permanently at theinstitute 2 ------

2. Efforts made by the institutes for the

Promotion of the DOEACC Scheme 2 ------

3. Institutes’ own advertising of DOEACCCourses 2 ------

4. Whether the institute’s Website containsa briefing about DOEACC courses, admissionprocedure, the fee structure of different

faculty details etc. 4 ------Total ____

6.9 Feedback from Students & Faculty (20)

1. Awareness about different courses of DOEACC 2 ------

2. Quality of practical work as felt by the

Students 1 ------3. Access to library facilities 1 ------4. Usefulness of guest Lectures 2 ------

5. Project Assistance 4 ------6. Placement Assistance 2 ------7. Help in Registration/Examination Form

Filling 2 ------

8. Faculty Retention 4 ------9. Participation in Training Programs 2 ------

Total ____

6.10 Prospectus (40)Whether the institute’s prospectus contains the followings:i. A briefing about DOEACC Courses? 3 ------

ii. Faculty details 4 ------iii. Infrastructure 4 ------iv. Fee Structure 10 ------

v. Uniformity in charging fees for each batch 10 ------vi. Whether the prospectus is free or at cost? 4 ------

(If at cost, then give the cost)

vii. Frequency of revision of the prospectus 5 ------

Total ____

GRAND TOTAL:Overall Rating of the institute : (on a scale 200)Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor

176 & above 151-175 126-150 101-125 100 & below

Strengths :

Weaknesses :

Signature of Member Signature of the Convenor

Name NameExpert No. Expert No. Address Address

Tel. Tel.

Annexure-II

Institution Report to be submitted toVisiting Team

1. Institution Name2. Address3. ACCR No./PROV No.

4. Prov./Full Accreditation letter/certificate is displayed at theCounsellors’ rooms/reception of the institute Yes No

3

7/28/2019 July Sept02


4

5. Number of batches run for the DOEACC ‘ ‘ Levels of

courses:

Sl. No Batch No. No. of students ineach batch

6. RESOURCES6.1 Faculty :

S.No

NameDesignation Quali fication Date of Joining

Computer Experience

FullTime

PartTime

SupportFaculty

2. Average stay of faculty with the institute:3. Student – Teacher ratio:

6.2 Hardware1. Owned (authority of purchase to be indicated) (Pentium Ii

266 MHz systems and above)

S.No.

Make/Model

Configuration Qnty. Supplier Dt. O f Purchase

4. PROPOSED, if any

6.3 Software

1. EXISTING SoftwareS.No.

OS/Compiler/Packages

Ver.No. No. of copies

Supplier Dt. of purchase

2. PROPOSED Procurement of Software, if any

6.4 Library

1. Reading room facility available : Y/N(Mention the size of room)

2. Availability of books related to

course material to the students : Y/N3. Total no. of books : ____ 4. No. of original copies

- DOEACC Prospectus : ……………………- DOEACC Syllabus : ……………………- All recommended books : Y/N

- Periodicals (specify the names:

7. Project Assistance

- No. of completed projects so far in different levels(please provide details for each level separately)

- No. of projects pending

- Any arrangement with the industries to give projectassistance in the field of your students (give details)

8. Administration1. Total area available in sq.mts ----------2. Record of progress is being

maintained3. Are the students made aware

of DOEACC Scheme

4. Whether the institute’s prospectuscontains a briefing about DOEACCcourses, admission procedure, the

fee structure of different courses,infrastructure, faculty details etc.

5. When was the prospectus last revised? (Please attach the

latest copy also)6. Providing hand-outs/books provided to the students7. Follows the DOEACC Syllabus

8. Ratio of Practical & Theory classes9. No. of hrs, per week for theory/lab10. Student per terminal (a) 1:1 (b) 1:2 (c) more than 3

11. Hands on facilities

12. Teaching Aids used

9. Placement

What are the efforts made by the institute to give placementassistance to the DOEACC Qualifiers.- Professional Practice

- Maintenance of placement record

- Please enclose a list of industries with whom the institutionhas linkages for placement of students.

- No. of students given placement during last year (level wise)

10. Training Methodology

- Any innovative method being adopted by the institutefor training in DOEACC Course. Please give details

- Training of candidates in industry : whether institute

have arrangement with industry to give actual workingexperience in the field to their students (give details)

11. PERFORMANCE IN DOEACC EXAMINATION (pleaseprovide details for each level)

No. of CandidatesYear

Sent Cleared Exam

Pass

%

No. of Candidates with

‘A’ grade or above

- System of in-house test to monitor the progress of students- Tests and assignments given to the students

- Action on failed students

12. PUBLICITY / PROMOTIONAL EFFORTS

- Banner of conducting DOEACC accreditedcourse for specified level is displayed

permanently at the institute

- What are the efforts made by the institute for the promotion of the DOEACC Scheme

- Advertisement released by the institute during the last year

(Please attach the copies also)

13. Participation in DOEACC Programmes (Give Details)

(a) Workshops (b) TTP(c) Contribution to revision of syllabi etc.

14. Miscellaneous- Changes in management, franchise financing

Has the institute kept a record of its weaknesses as

Communicated by DOEACC students and whether thoseweaknesses mentioned have been rectified?

- Faculty changes since getting accreditation

if yes, informed DOEACCCWhether, faculty resignation high

- List of training conducted/organized for faculty skills upgradation

15. Future Plans, if any:Signature

(authorized representative of institute)NameDesignation

Address of the InstitutePhone (O)

VARIFIED & FORWARDED BY CONVENOR TO DOEACC

SOCIETY

Signature of the Convenor Signature of the Member

of Monitoring Team of Monitoring Team

DATE ____________

PLACE ____________

Yes No

NoYes

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

NoYes

Yes No

4

7/28/2019 July Sept02


5

Introduction of Variable Accreditation Fee

In order to ensure quality of IT education in theinstitutes accredited by DOEACC, it has beendecided to introduce ‘Variable Accreditation Fee’and Awareness Creation Fund’. A few clarifications

have been sought from the institutions, which havebeen replied individually for the benefit of all theinstitutes. It is clarified that the contribution on theaccount i.e. Variable Accreditation Fee and

Awareness Creation Fund is to be met by theinstitutes from their internal resources. Under nocircumstances, any additional fee is to be chargedfrom the students in any manner on this account.Had the idea been to charge the amount from thestudents, DOEAC could have increased theExamination Fee. It was not considered appropriateas that would have put additional burden on thestudents.

It is clarified that all the accredited institutes, both inprivate and public sectors, are abiding by thedecision of the Society in this respect. No case hascome to out notice wherein Variable AccreditationFees or Awareness Creation Fund is being chargedfrom the students.

A letter has been addressed to all the institutesproviding the clarifications in this regard which isreproduced below:

No. 2(15)2002-DOEACC Soc. 11th

October 2002

All the Institutes authorized to conduct DOEACCCourse(s)

Subject: Introduction of Variable AccreditationFee (VAF) and Awareness CreationFund (ACF) w.e.f. January 2003 Exams.

Sir,

This is in continuation to Society’s Letter No.2(15)/2002-DOEACC Society, dated 3

rdJune 2002

regarding introduction of Variable Accreditation Feeand Awareness Creation Fund with effect fromJanuary 2003 examinations (Annexure A).

2. In this regard, the Society is in receipt of afew queries from some of the institutes accredited toconduct DOEACC course(s). Therefore, in thefitness of things, it is thought necessary to sharethese queries (Annexure-B) and their clarificationswith all the institutes as this would further facilitateinstitutes to implement both the said Schemes asenvisaged.

3. It may be clarified that contribution towardsboth the schemes, i.e., the Variable AccreditationFee and `Awareness Creation Fund’ should be metby the institutes from within their internal resources.Under no circumstances, the above fee is to becharged from the students in any manner

whatsoever.

4. Accordingly, all the institutes should ensurethat both Variable Accreditation Fee and AwarenessCreation Fund are remitted to the Office of DOEACCSociety along with filled-in examination applicationforms for January 2003 examination as per thedetails given in Annexure-C.

5. Should there be any further queries, pleasefeel free to contact DOEACC Society and ensurethat Examination Application Forms for January2003 Examinations for all the Levels should reach

DOEACC Society by October 30th

2002 (Afternoon)along with the above contributions. If theapplications are received without the abovecontributions, appropriate action will be initiated inrespect of concerned institutes, as per normsapplicable to institutes authorized to conductDOEACC Course(s).

Yours faithfully,

(SK Gupta)Chief Finance Officer & Registrar

Anneuxre - A

Details of the amount to be paid by the Institutesauthorized to conduct DOEACC accredited course(s)based upon the number of candidates being fielded inby the Institute for the first time.

Slab

Awarenesscreation

fund[Amount in

Rs.]

Variableaccreditatio

n fees[Amount in

Rs.]

Total[Amount in

Rs.]

Total[Amountin Rs.]

Upto 25 2000 Nil 2000 2000

Upto 50 (2000)+2000 6000 10000 10000

Upto-75 (4000)+2000 (6000)+6000 (10000)+8000 18000

Upto-100 (6000)+2000 (12000)+6000 (18000)+8000 26000

Upto-125 (8000)+2000 (18000)+6000 (26000)+8000 34000Upto-150 (10000)+2000 (24000)+6000 (34000)+8000 42000

Upto-175 (12000)+2000 (30000)+6000 (42000)+8000 50000

Upto-200 (14000)+2000 (36000)+6000 (50000)+8000 58000

Upto-225 (16000)+2000 (42000)+6000 (58000)+8000 66000

Upto-250 (18000)+2000 (48000)+6000 (66000)+8000 74000

Upto-275 (20000)+2000 (54000)+6000 (74000)+8000 82000

Upto-300 (22000)+2000 (60000)+6000 (82000)+8000 90000

Note: Additional Rs. 8000/- for every slab of 25 candidates or part thereof.

5

7/28/2019 July Sept02


6

Anneuxre - B

Q.1 When wou ld the Scheme o f ‘Var iab le Acc reditation Fee’ be introduced?

A. The Scheme of ‘Variable Accreditation Fee’ isapplicable w.e.f. January 2003 Examinations.

(Refer last para of DOEACC letter No.2(15)2002-DOEACC Soc. dated 3

rdJune 2002).

Q.2 Is th is Scheme app l icab le to only those institutes that have recently acquired

accreditation?

A. No, this Scheme is applicable to all institutesaccredited to conduct DOEACC course(s),irrespective of the date on which they have beengranted accreditation.

Q.3 Would the extra amount pertain ing to ‘Var iab le Acc reditation Fee’ be charged with every bunch

of Examination application Forms ?

A. The Variable Accreditation Fee is to be remitted atthe time of submission of Examination ApplicationForm by the institute (Performa is placed at

Annexure-C). Institutes are advised to submit thePerforma duly filled-in, along with the filled-inExamination Application Form, accompanied by twoseparate Demand Drafts/Pay Order in respect of (a)Examination Fee, (b) Variable Accreditation Feeand Awareness Creation Fund.

Q.4(a)Students registered for O/A/B level would norm ally not appear in all the mo dules/papers

together. He/she would r equire to undertake 2-5

separate examinations (depending upon the level) to appearing in the different mod ules/papers at least once. Therefore, is ‘Variable Acc reditation Fee’ applicable only fo r the first examination or is it applicable for

subs equent examin ations as well?

Q.4(b)After the course is ov er, the student m ay stil l continue to appear through us, as his registration period m ay remain valid even after

course com plet ion, as owing to his personal reasons, he has failed or remained absent. In such cases for how long would the inst i tu te bear for the students?

A. The Variable Accreditation Fee is to be remitted bythe institute for students’ first attempt/appearanceonly for a particular level. This fee is not applicablefor any subsequent attempts/appearances in thesame level by the student. It may, however, benoted that VAF and ACF needs to be remitted, inrespect of first attempt/appearance for each level of a particular level, i.e. irrespective of the number of examination that a student undertakes.Subsequently, VAF is applicable for only the first

attempt/appearance of a student in a particular higher level.

Q.5 If a bunch o f Examinat ion App li cat ion Forms is less that 25 students, would the ‘Variable Accreditation Fee’ be calculated on pro-rata basis?

A. No, not on pro-rata basis, the Variable AccreditationFee & Awareness Creation Fund, is payable for abatch of 25 or part thereof, i.e. even, if a single formis forwarded by an institute, VAF should be remittedas applicable for a batch of 25 students/

Q.6 Is ‘Var iab le Accredi tat ion Fee’ and Awareness Creation Fund the same Schemes?

A. No, Variable Accreditation and Awareness Creationare two distinct Schemes with separate feestructures. The fee structures of both the Schemesare defined at Annexure-A.

Q.7 Would th is amoun t have to be charged f rom the students or w ould the institute bear it?

A. It may be clarified that contribution towards both theSchemes, i.e. the Variable Accreditation Fee and

Awareness Creation Fund should be met by theinstitutes from within their internal resources.Under no circumstances, the above fee is to becharged from the students in any manner whatsoever.

Q.8 Recons ider the amoun t fo r Va riab le

Accreditation Fee because in the proposed Scheme, the Institut io ns fielding m ore that 25

students by paying more against Variable Awareness Creation Contribution & Variable Acc reditation Fee, will only s hare the increased financial burden on the DOEACC Society. Just cons ider, that an institute having 26 students,will have to pay Rs.8000/- for 26 students

against th ese Fee?

A. While framing the Scheme, this aspect has alreadybeen discussed. The contribution towards theVariable Accreditation Fee and Awareness Creationare to be paid as per details given in Annexure-A.

Q.9 With the s low down in IT indust ry , i t has become diff icult to enroll students. In this regard, it is felt that introduction o f two new Schemes with separate fee structures is too taxing?

A. This has already been examined. Additional fundsgenerated shall be used for Awareness Creationonly. Introduction of these Schemes will provebeneficial to both the DOEACC Scheme as also theinstitutes accredited to conduct DOEACCCourse(s).

6

7/28/2019 July Sept02


7

ANNEXURE-C

VARIABLE ACCREDITATION FEE AND AWARENESS CREATION FUND ALONG WITH THE EXAMINATION FORMFOR JANUARY 2003 EXAMIANTION

(Last Date: October 31 st , 2002 – Wi thout Late Fee &November 10

th , 2002 – With Late Fee @ Rs.100/- Per Candidate)

Name of the Institute : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Address of the Institute : …………...…………………………………………………………………………………. ……………

Email : ………………………………………………………………………………………………………

S.No. Level O A B C Total Amount

1. Accr. No.

2. No. of Candidates appearing throughyour institute

3. No. of Candidates appearing for the f irst

time

4. No. of candidates excluding first 25candidates (S.No 3-25) say ‘X’

candidates

5. Multiple of 25 (i,e X/25)

6. Amount of Variable Accreditat ion fee @

Rs.6000/- per 25 candidates or partthereof

7. Amount of Awareness Creation Fund

@Rs.2000/- per 25 candidates or partthereof

8. Total

Enclosed herewith Demand Draft No. ________________ dated _____________ for Rs. _____________ .

Authorised Signatory(with Seal and Name of the Institute)

See instru ctions o verleaf

1. The Scheme of ̀ Variable Accreditation Fee’ is applicable w.e.f. Jan 2003.

2. The Scheme is applicable to all institutes accredited to conduct DOEACC Course(s), irrespective of the date on which they havebeen granted accreditation.

3. The variable accreditation fee is to be remitted at the time of submission of examination application form by the institutes (`Performa’is placed overleaf.) Institutes are advised to submit the Performa duly filled-in, alongwith the filled-in examination application form,accompanied by two separate demand drafts/Pay-Order in respect of (a) examination Fee, (b) variable accreditation fee and Awareness Creation Fund.

4. The variable accreditation fee is to be remitted by the institute only for students’ first attempt/appearance in a particular level. ThisScheme is not applicable for any subsequent attempts/appearances in the same Level by the student. It may, however, be noted

that VAF and ACF needs to be remitted, in respect of first attempt/appearance for each Level of a particular level, i.e. irrespective of the number of examination that a student undertakes, subsequently, VAF is applicable for only the first attempt/appearance of astudent in a particular Level.

5. The `Variable Accreditation Fee’ & Awareness Creation Fund, is payable for a batch of 25 or part thereof, i.e. even if, a single formis forwarded by an institute, VAF should be remitted as applicable for a batch of 25 students.

6. Variable Accreditation and Awareness Creation are two distinct Schemes with separate fee structures. The fee structures of boththe Schemes are defined as Annexure-A.

7. The Variable Accreditation Fee and ̀ Awareness Creation Fund’ should be met by the institutes from within their internal resources.Under no circumstances, the above fee is to be charged from the students in any manner whatsoever.

TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE ACCREDITED INSTITUTE

7

7/28/2019 July Sept02


8

** GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION

rr DOEACC Overseas – Singapore & Uzbekistan

ã Mutual recognit ion between DOEACC ‘B’

& ‘C’ level Examinat ion and CITPM Associate Examinat ion for Singapore

Computer Society

An MOU has been signed betweenSingapore Computer Society (SCS),National Infocomm Competency Centre(NICC) / Ministry of Information,Communications & the Arts and DOEACCSociety/Department of InformationTechnology for mutual recognition of DOEACC ‘B’ Level with three yearsexperience and ‘C’ Level with one year experience in Project Management; withCITPM (Certified IT Project Manager)

Associate Examination of SingaporeComputer Society/National InfocommCompetency Centre, Singapore.

His Excellency Mr. Seechakmun, Hon’ble Ambassador of Singapore in India is seen with Mr. Pankaj Agrawala, Joint Secretary (Information), Department of Information Technology,Government of India & Executive Director, DOEACC Society

As a result of this mutual recognition,DOEACC ‘B’ & ‘C’ Level Qualifiers would beconsidered equivalent to “CITPM Associate”qualification of Singapore and as such thisagreement opens up new opportunities for

the DOEACC ‘B’ & ‘C’ Level Qualifiers for employment in Singapore.

The MOU was signed on 7th August 2002 byMr. Martin Tsang, President, Computer Societyof Singapore, Dr. Kaizad Heerjee, Asstt. Chief Executive, Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore, Mr, Alex Siow, Chairman, NationalInfocomm Competency Centre and Mr. Pankaj

Agrawala, Joint Secretary, Department of

Information Technology, Dr. P.N. Gupta,Executive Director, DOEACC Society.

ã Implementat ion of DOEACC Scheme in Uzbekistan

Subsequent to the visit of DIT Delegation toUzbekistan, an MOU was signed betweenDOEACC Society and Agency for NewInformation Technologies (NITEX), anautonomous body of Centre for Science &Technology, Republic of Uzbekistan on 7

th

June 2002. A Project Planning Workshopwas also held on 28

thJune 2002. The

DOEACC Society will accredit institutions inUzbekistan for ‘O’ & ‘A’ Levels so that thestudents are able to appear in the DOEACCExaminations as early as possible.

** INTERFACE WITH INSTITUTES,

STUDENTS & AWARENESS

CREATION

rr 8th

DOEACC Annual Review Workshop

One of the factors which has played a significantrole in ensuring quality education in the non-formalsector under the DOEACC umbrella is the processof continuous improvement by obtaining a feedbackfrom the institutes through the Annual reviewWorkshop wherein managers/faculty membersrepresent their institutes and take active part in thediscussions on the functioning of the DOEACCSociety based upon their experience of directlyworking with DOEACC students and their parents.

Prof. K.K. Aggarwal, Chairman, Governing Council, DOEACC Society isseen with Shri Pramod Mahajan, Hon’ble Minister of Communications &Information Technology lighting the lamp during the inaugural session of the 8

thAnnual Review Workshop on April 26, 2002 at New Delhi.

8

7/28/2019 July Sept02


9

This participatory planning and review approachhelps in identifying the gaps both in terms of changing needs of industry and technology trendsand applying corrective actions and taking up newinitiatives. This process enables the Society to keepthe syllabus upto date and conduct the examinationsat the national level effectively.

The 8th

Annual Review Workshop was held on 26th

April 2002 at Hotel Oberoi, New Delhi. TheWorkshop was inaugurated by Shri PramodMahajan, Hon’ble Minister of Parliamentary Affairs,Communications and Information Technolgy andGovt. of India. Prof. K.K. Aggarwal, Vice Chancellor,Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University andChairman, DOEACC Governing Council deliveredthe welcome address which was followed by Key-Note Address by Prof. (Dr.) R. Natarajan, Chairman,

AICTE. The Workshop was presided over by Shri

Rajeeva Ratna Shah, I.A.S. Secretary, Departmentof Information Technology, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Govt. of India.

Prof. C.S. Jha, former Chairman, Governing Council, DOEACC Society, presents DOEACC ‘B’ Level Diploma during the First DOEACC Convocation.

The Workshop was conducted in three sessions i.e.Business Session I, Business Session II and OpenSession.

First DOEACC ConvocationThe Workshop was concluded with Presentation of Awards to DOEACC ‘O’ Level and ‘A’ Level toppersand Students Project Competition Winners followedby DOEACC Convocation by way of presentation of Diploma to ‘B’ and ‘C’ Level Qualifiers which wasdone for the first time. Following students wereawarded DOEACC Diplomas and Certificates in theFirst DOEACC Convocation:

List of ‘B’ Level Qualifiers

1. Ms. Puja Khatri (Regn. No. 5925)2. Mr. Promod R. (Regn. No. 35338)3. Mr. Machnani Girish Kishin

(Regn. No.44861)

4. Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal (Regn. No. 47925)5. Ms. Sadhna Jain (Regn. No.63436)6. Ms. Anuradha Suri (Regn. No.63924)7. Mr. Kumaresan M. (Regn. No. 57079)8. Ms. Parul Sharma (regn. No. 79817)9. Mr. Vankayalapati Sireesh Babu

(Regn. No. 80904)10. Ms. Priti Singh (Regn. No.95370)11. Mr. Sanjay Sukul (Regn. No.96141)12. Mr. Gaddam Sivayogeswara Reddy

(Regn. No. 101042)13. Mr. Triloki Nath Sharma (Regn. No.110867)14. Ms. Binu V.M. (Regn. No. 121307)15. Mr. Sunil Sebastian (Regn. No. 121315)16. Mr. Deepesh Agarwal (Regn. No.121346)

17. Ms. Usha Patnaik (Regn. No. 121588)18. Mr. Biju P.A. (Regn. No. 142011)19. Mr. Sinu Thomas (Regn. No. 144077)20. Ms. Rejeesh T.S. (Regn. No. 144078)21. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Kharb

(Regn. No. 154082)22. Ms. V. Sripriya (Regn. No.154339)23. Ms. Suparana Bhalla (Regn. No 158182)24. Mr, Vivek Dalal (Regn. No. 159860)25. Ms. Meenu Tikoo (Regn. No. 161455)26. Ms. K. Sreelakshmi (Regn. No. 95570)27. Ms. Vimla Anne (Regn. No. 47770)28. Ms. Tushi Ravi (Regn. No. 78970)29. Mr. Samaresh Datta (Regn. No. 15351)30. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Azad

(Regn. No. 69476)31. Ms. Kantipudi Mohini Manjulatha

(Regn. No. 85120)32. Mr. Deepak Rai (regn. No.81760)33. Mr. Niranjan Maharana (Regn. No.88902)34. Mr. Sarwan Singh (regn. No.95979)35. Mr. Biswanti Kar (Regn. No. 96175)36. Mr. Sanjay Nath Jha (Regn. No. 140268)37. Mr. Nandiwada Maralidhar (Regn. No.141777)38. Ms. Pooja Sooji (Regn. No. 141969)39. Mr. N.V. Prasanth (Regn. No. 143698)40. Mr. Sameer Rajvanshi (Regn. No. 155283)41. Ms. B. Saritha Reddy (Regn. No. 157093)42. Mr. Dev Kant Pachauli (Regn. No. 158649)43. Ms. Arti Aggarwal (Regn. NO. 159866)

44. Mr. Rahul P.V. (Regn. No.183201)45. Ms. Manjusha Nair M. (Regn. No.183241)46. Ms. Padmavathi Bandhakavi (Regn. No.121848)47. Ch. Gopi Krishna (Regn. No.124446)48. Mr. Ramineni Mahitha (Regn. No.138673)49. Mr. Anshuman Borah (Regn. No. 102542)

‘C’ Level Qualifier

50. Ms. Selva Kumar R,K. (Regn. No.3155)

9

7/28/2019 July Sept02


10

** REGISTRATION

Rejection of Registration Forms

Our past experience shows that large number of forms get rejected on petty mistakes on the part of

the candidates filling up the forms and the institutesare not giving proper attention to check the filled informs before forwarding the same to the Society.Following are some of the tips to be kept in viewwhile filling up of the Form or cross checking thesame before being forwarded to DOEACC.a. Forms not signed by the applicant;

b. The candidate not eligible;

c. The attested copies of certificates of educational qualification not attached;

d. The DD not attached/the DD attached isnot for sufficient amount to meet theRegistration Fee and mandatory chargesfor publication;

e. DD not in favour of DOEACC or is not

valid or issuing /drawee branch code hasnot been indicated;

f. Name miss-match in the RegistrationForm and certificates of educationalqualification.

All concerned are, therefore, requested to keeprelevant instructions in view while filling up of theRegistration Form to avoid rejections.

DATE SHEET FOR JANUARY 2003 EXAMINATIONS

FN : FORENOON : 0930 - 1230 (Indian Standard Time)AN : AFTERNOON : 1400 - 1700 (Indian Standard Time)

‘O’ Level Module ‘A’ Level Paper ‘B’ Level Paper ‘C’ Level Paper Date

FN AN FN AN FN AN FN AN

11/01/2003 M-2 M3.1M3.2M3.3

A-1 A2.1 A2.2

B1.1 B1.21 C1.1 C1.2

12/01/2003 M1.1M1.2M1.3

M4.1M4.2M4.3

A-3 A-4 B1.3 B1.4 C1.3 C2.1

13/01/2003 A-5 A-6 B1.5 & BE1 B2.1BE2

C2.2 C2.3

14.01.2003 A-7 A-8 B2.2 & BE3 B2.3 & BE4 C3.1 C3.215/01/2003 A-9 A10.1

A10.2 A10.3 A10.4

B2.4 & BE5 B2.51B2.52B2.53B2.54BE6

CE3.3.1CE3.3.2CE3.3.3

C4.1

16.01.2003 B3.1 B3.2 C4.2 CE4.3.1CE4.3.2

CE4.3.317/01/2003 B3.3 B3.4 C5.1 C5.218/01/2003 B3.5 B4.1 CE5.3.1

CE5.3.2CE5.3.3

19/01/2003 B4.2 B4.320/01/2003 B4.4 B4.521/01/2003 B5.1 B5.2

10

7/28/2019 July Sept02


11

7/28/2019 July Sept02


12

EDITORIAL BOARD

Patron-in-Chief Patrons Editorial Team

Shri Rajeeva Ratna Shah Prof. K.K. Aggarwal - Dr. P.N. GuptaSecretary, MIT and Chairman, Governing CouncilPresident, DOEACC Society DOEACC Society - Shri S.C. Dhyani

Shri S. Lakshminarayanan - Shri V.P. ManchandaAddl. Secretary, MIT

Documents

July Sept02