Upload
vuonghanh
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | 2014 Update
Poso Creek June 2014
Semitropic Water Storage District1101 Central Ave., P.O. Box 8043Wasco, CA 93280
Poso Creek Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
2014 Update – Public Review Draft (Sections)
- i -
List of Acronyms
ACS American Community Survey
AWMP Agricultural Water Management Plan
BDCP Bay-Delta Conservation Plan
BMO Basin Management Objective
CASGEM California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (DWR)
CASWSC California Water Science Center (USGS)
CDPH California Department of Health
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System (DWR)
COG Council of Governments
CVC Cross Valley Canal
CVP Central Valley Project (Federal – USBR)
CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act
CVRWQCB Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
CWC California Water Code
DAC Economically-Disadvantaged Community
DAMS Department of Agriculture and Measurement Standards (Kern County)
DMS Data Management System
DWR California Department of Water Resources
ESR Endangered Species Recovery (Program)
FMMP California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
FWA Friant Water Authority
GHG Greenhouse Gases (Emissions)
GIS Geographic Information System
GWMP Groundwater Management Plan
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
ID Irrigation District
ILRP Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program
IRWM Integrated Regional Water Management (Plan or Group)
IRWMG Integrated regional Water Management Group
IRWMP Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
JPA Joint Powers Authority
KCAD Kern County Agricultural Department
KCWA Kern County Water Agency
KGWMC Kern Groundwater Management Committee
KCWRC Kern County Water Resources Committee
KGWMC Kern Groundwater Management Committee
KNWR Kern National Wildlife Refuge
KRWCA Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority
LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission
Poso Creek Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
2014 Update – Public Review Draft (Sections)
- ii -
List of Acronyms (Continued)
M&I Municipal and Industrial (Water Uses)
MHI Median Household Income
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NWKRCD North West Kern Resource Conservation District
NRCS Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA)
NWS National Weather Service
PDCF Project Definition and Characterization Form (Submission Form)
PIP Public Involvement Plan (Appendix G)
QA/QC Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures
RMA Regional Management Agency (changed to RWMG)
RMG Regional Management Group (changed to RWMG)
RMS Resource Management Strategy
RWMG Regional Water Management Group
SDAC Severely Disadvantaged Community (DAC)
SHE Self-Help Enterprises, LLC.
SWP State Water Project (State – DWR)
SWRCB California State Water Resources Control Board
TBWP Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners
USACE US Army Corps of Engineers
USBR US Bureau of Reclamation
USCID US Committee on Irrigation and Drainage
USDA US Department of Agriculture
USGS US Geological Survey
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
WCP Water Conservation Plan
WD Water District
WMP Water Management Plan
WSD Water Storage District
Poso Creek Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
2014 Update – Public Review Draft (Sections)
dfasdf
Initial Pages
Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Plan Synopsis and
IRWM Group Participants Tables
- i -
POSO CREEK INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT (IRWM) GROUP
2014 IRWM PLAN UDPATE SYNOPSIS
The purpose of the original 2007 Poso Creek IRWM Plan, the first IRWM Plan
completed and adopted by the Poso Creek IRWM Group, was to provide a framework for (1)
coordinating groundwater and surface water management activities through regional objectives,
and (2) implementing the measures necessary to meet those objectives. These statements
reflected the aims of the IRWM Group to improve water resources management that benefits
inhabitants throughout the Poso Creek Region (Region) as well as water purveyors in other parts
of California while satisfying regional priorities. At the time, the priorities principally
considered the Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) IRWM Proposition 50 Program
Guidelines and the Resource Management Strategies (RMSs) presented in the California Water
Plan Update 2005.
While these purposes and goals remain, the 2014 IRWM Plan Update (Plan) reflects the
IRWM Group’s expanded planning efforts to address requirements in the DWR’s Proposition 84
IRWM Guidelines that focus on additional RMSs (California Water Plan Update 2013) and the
IRWM Plan Standards as follows:
1. Coordination of comprehensive resource management activities for surface water,
groundwater, environmental, and municipal into a cohesive set of “Regional Goals”
(Goals) and “Measurable Objectives” (Objectives).
2. Evaluation and adaptation of the RWMG’s Measurable Objectives, including
Mission/Vision, Regional Goals and their compliance with State planning requirements
for considering Program Preferences, Statewide Priorities, and RMSs.
3. Assessment of structural (project) and non-structural (program) enhancements that
conform to the Measurable Objectives, leading to eventual implementation by the IRWM
Group.
While this Plan was developed to compliment and expand upon the original 2007 Plan, the
overriding conclusions remain the same. That is, surface water supplies available through
delivery to the Region have been largely unreliable, on an annual basis, and will likely remain
unreliable (reduced) in the future relative to historical conditions. Given water users within the
districts that are involved in the IRWM Groups’ efforts are reliant on surface water sources
delivered from outside the Region, it will likely lead to a corresponding decline in groundwater
levels as groundwater is used to make up the reduction in surface water supplies if proactive
- ii -
actions are not taken. The economic, environmental, and social burdens of this scenario will be
felt by all users that rely in whole or in part on pumped groundwater, including a significant
portion of agricultural, environmental, and municipal (communities) users in the Region.
As a generalization, this Plan puts into context the planning and implementation efforts to
address these concerns by the IRWM Group through the direction of the Regional Water
Management Group (RWMG). The RWMG is comprised of the districts and agencies that
consider and provide funding of the planning and implementation efforts. In addition to the
RWMG, the IRWM Group includes other regional Stakeholders, members that are directly
involved with or potentially affected by the planning and management efforts of the RWMG,
Interested Parties, and public or private entities that have interest in the Poso Creek regional
planning process but may or may not be directly involved. This Plan contains materials
discussed in context to regional water management needs and concerns for the IRWM Group
regarding the follow subjects:
- RWMG and IRWM Group Governance: Discusses the IRWM Group’s governance
structure based on the agreements and management of the RWMG. Includes the
decision making processes and outreach/involvement efforts used to facilitate
participation in the IRWM Group by the RWMG, Stakeholders, and Interested Parties
(public).
- Regional Description: Discusses the Poso Creek Region, including the water supply
and demand situation, social and cultural makeup, and regional management
objectives and conflicts which have led to the opportunity for regional water
management activities.
- Regional Goals and Measurable Objectives: Discusses the IRWM Group’s Goals
and Objectives, including quantitative and qualitative metrics for monitoring and
achieving said Goals and Objectives. Development of the Goals and Objectives
consider Statewide Priorities and Resources Management Strategies, as well as the
primary resource concerns of regional water users (e.g., agricultural, environmental,
municipal, etc.)
- Projects and Programs Review Process: Discusses the procedure by which any
district, agency, organization, or individual can submit projects and programs to the
IRWM Group for consideration. Includes the RWMG and IRWM Group review
process, and the means by which the Group communicates the list of projects and
programs which have been selected for inclusion in the IRWM Group’s planning and
implementation efforts.
- Impacts and Benefits: Discusses the potential impacts and benefits of Plan
implementation in the Region, to neighboring regions, with community (DAC),
environmental, and economic concerns.
- Plan Performance, Monitoring, and Data Management: Discusses the performance
measures and monitoring methods to ensure that the Plan Objectives are met.
- iii -
Includes details on the data needs of the IRWM Group and how the collected data is
shared publically and with local, State, and Federal agencies.
- Funding Opportunities: Discusses the plans for implementation and financing of
projects and programs, including the potential funding mechanisms (e.g., grant
funding support). The certainty and longevity of these funding sources is also
discussed, as well as how to operate and maintain projects and programs once funding
is no longer available.
- Technical Analysis: Discusses the technical analyses used in development of the
Plan, with particular emphasis on the data and baseline conclusions from the original
2007 IRWM Plan.
- Relation to Water Resources and Land-Use Planning: Discusses the relation of the
Plan to other planning documents and programs in the Region, and how the IRWM
Group coordinates with these planning efforts.
- Stakeholder and Public Involvement: Further discusses the means by which the
IRWM Group facilitates participation in the regional planning and implementation
activities, by the RWMG, Stakeholders, and Interested Parties. Emphases are placed
on public participation and the participation of regional communities (DACs).
- Coordination and Integration Standards: Discusses the process by which the IRWM
Group coordinates projects and programs with local agencies (Stakeholders and
Interested Parties). Addresses neighboring IRWM Groups and cooperation efforts
between inter-regional groups.
- Climate Change Assessment: Discusses an evaluation of the Region’s vulnerabilities
to the potential impacts of climate change and how these vulnerabilities are addressed
by the IRWM Group when considering projects and programs (e.g., GHG emissions,
environmental impacts, etc.)
Both structural projects and non-structural program enhancements are addressed in this Plan,
while conforming to the stated Goals and Objectives. These provide the means for coordinating
the assets, needs, and operations regarding water supplies and demands in the Region, with the
end result being mitigated water concerns for the RWMG, Stakeholders, and Interested Parties.
The following pages (tables) acknowledge the participation of the individual districts,
agencies, organizations, and individuals who make up the RWMG, Stakeholders, and Interested
Parties of the Poso Creek IRWM Group. Each of the Boards of Directors of the districts that
make up the RWMG have adopted the Plan and its contents, representing their continued
participation in further developing, funding, and ultimately managing the IRWM Group. Note
that the RWMG had also adopted the original 2007 IRWM Plan in July 2007. To that extent, the
Plan should be considered a living document which may change in response to new information,
changed conditions, or other factors.
IRWM Participating Districts & Agencies
Poso Creek RWMG Participants
District, Agency of Entity Location Special District
Type1
Voting
Rights
Funding
Commit.
Semitropic (SWSD)2
Wasco, CA Water Storage District X X
North Kern (NKWSD) Bakersfield, CA Water Storage District X X
Cawelo (CWD) Bakersfield, CA Water District X X
Shafter-Wasco (SWID) Wasco, CA Irrigation District X X
Kern-Tulare (KTWD) Bakersfield, CA Water District X X
North West Kern (NWKRCD) Bakersfield, CA Resource Conservation
District X
Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Representative X 1 Statutory authority for water supply and/or water management granted under the California Water Code.
2 IRWM Leading Agency.
Poso Creek IRWM Stakeholder Members
District, Agency of Entity Location CWC
Category1
Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District (DEID) Delano, CA WP, GD
Southern San Joaquin Municipal Utility District (SSJ MUD) Delano, CA WP, GD
Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District Bakersfield, CA WP, GD
Buena Vista Water Storage District Buttonwillow, CA WP, GD
Lost Hills Utility District (LHUD) Lost Hills, CA GD
Lost Hills Water District (LHWD) Lost Hills, CA GD, WP
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Sacramento, CA SF
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Fresno, CA SF
Kern County Water Agency (KCWA) Bakersfield, CA WP, SF
Kern National Wildlife Refuge Wasco, CA GD, ES 1 Stakeholder and local agency categories as defined by the California Water Code §10541(g), see Plan Section 11.1.
Poso Creek IRWM Stakeholder Members (Continued)
District, Agency of Entity Location CWC
Category1
Semitropic Wildlife Improvement District Wasco, CA GD, ES
Friant Water Users Authority Lindsay, CA ES, CO
Bishop Acres Mutual Water Company Bakersfield, CA WP
Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners Three Rivers, CA ES
Cities and Unincorporated Communities 2
City of Delano Delano, CA GD, CO, DC
City of McFarland McFarland, CA GD, CO, DC
City of Shafter Shafter, CA GD, CO, DC
Community of Buttonwillow Buttonwillow, CA CO, DC
Community of Earlimart Earlimart, CA CO, DC
Community of Lost Hills Lost Hills, CA CO, DC
Community of Richgrove Richgrove, CA CO, DC
Community of Madonna (Unincorporated) Madonna, CA CO, DC
Community of Pond (Unincorporated) Pond, CA CO, DC
Community of North Shafter (Unincorporated) Shafter, CA CO, DC
Community of South Shafter (Unincorporated), including Smith’s Corner, Thomas Lane, Cherokee
Strip, Burbank, Mexican Colony, and Southwest Shafter Shafter, CA CO, DC
Pond Union School District Wasco, CA SS
Semitropic School District Wasco, CA SS
Maple Elementary School Shafter, CA SS
Shafter Farm Labor Camp Shafter, CA OT
Rodriguez Farm Labor Camp Richgrove, CA OT
Community of Allensworth (Unincorporated) Allensworth, CA CO, DC 1 Stakeholder and local agency categories as defined by the California Water Code §10541(g), see Plan Section 11.1.
2 All incorporated cities and communities are considered Disadvantaged Communities (DACs), represented by both
the DAC Representative (see RWMG Participants table) and a DAC Workgroup; see Plan Section 3.9.
Poso Creek IRWM Stakeholder Members (Continued)
District, Agency of Entity Location CWC
Category1
Cities and Unincorporated Communities 2
Community of Alpaugh (Unincorporated)3
Alpaugh, CA CO, DC
Community of Ducor (Unincorporated) 3 Ducor, CA CO, DC
Community of Blackwells Corner (Unincorporated) 3 Blackwells Corner, CA CO, DC
Individuals
Kathy Wood McLaughlin, Tulare Basin Watershed Coordinator Fresno, CA ES
Carole Combs, Tulare Basin Wildlife Partners Three Rivers, CA ES 1 Stakeholder and local agency categories as defined by the California Water Code §10541(g), see Plan Section 11.1.
2 All incorporated cities and communities are considered Disadvantaged Communities (DACs), represented by both
the DAC Representative (see RWMG Participants table) and a DAC Workgroup; see Plan Section 3.9. 3 Located outside of Poso Creek IRWM Region.
Poso Creek IRWM Interested Parties
District, Agency of Entity Location CWC
Category1
U.S. Department of Agriculture: Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA – NRCS) Bakersfield, CA SF, ES
Fresno State University: California Water Institute Fresno, CA SF
Kern River Watershed Coalition Authority Fresno, CA ES, CO
Kern County Board of Supervisors Bakersfield, CA GD
County of Kern Engineering Services Bakersfield, CA GD
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sacramento, CA SF, ES
Paramount Farms Lost Hills, CA IO
Community Water Center Visalia, CA CO
Individuals
Mathew Hurley, Angiola Water District Corcoran, CA WP, GD
Denise Akins, County of Tulare Visalia, CA GD
Misc.‘Public Interest’ including Landowners, Environmental Advocacy Groups, Private/ Public Organizations, etc. CO, OT