30
Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

  • View
    213

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Variation thinking

2WS02 Industrial Statistics

A. Di Bucchianico

Page 2: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

SPC: Philosophy

Let the process do the talking:

Goal: realize constant quality by controlling the

process with quantitative information

Constant quality means: quality with controlled and

known variation around a fixed target

Operator should be able to do the routine

controlling

Page 3: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Variation I

Page 4: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Variation II

Page 5: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Variation III

Page 6: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

109876543210

-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9

-10

Example: Dartec

disqualificationwhen outside range

Page 7: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Examples of variation patterns10

9876543210

-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9

-10

Page 8: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Metric for sample variation: range

easy to compute (pre-computer era!)

rather accurate for sample size < 10

minimum maximumrange

Page 9: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Metric for sample variation: standard deviation

11

1

22

1

2

n

XnX

n

XXS

n

ii

n

ii

• 2nd formula easier to compute by hand • 2nd formula less rounding errors• correct dimension of units• n-1 to ensure that average value equals

population variance (“unbiased estimator”)

Page 10: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Visualisation of sample variation

Box-and Whisker plot

Histogram for dartecok

-9 -6 -3 0 3 6 9

dartecok

0

5

10

15

20

25

30fr

equen

cy

histogram

Box-and-Whisker Plot

-8 -4 0 4 8

dartecok

Page 11: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

all observations first 60 observationsHistogram for dartecnotok

dartecnotok

frequency

-6 -3 0 3 6 90369

121518

dart

ecn

oto

k

0 20 40 60 80 100-6-30369

Histogram for dartecnotok

dartecnotok

frequency

-7 -4 -1 2 5 8 1105

1015202530

Page 12: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Variation and stability

Can variation be stable?

yes, if we mean that observations

– follow fixed probability distribution

– do not influence each other (independence)

stability -> predictability

How to handle a stable production process?

Page 13: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Why stable processes?

• behaviour is predictable

• processes can be left on itself: intervention may

be expensive

Page 14: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Deming’s funnel experiment

Page 15: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Lessons from funnel experiment

• tampering a stable process may lead to increase

of variation

• adjustments should be based on understanding of

process (engineering knowledge)

•we need a tool to check for stability

Page 16: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Attributive versus variable

two main types of measurements:

– attributive (yes/no, categories)

– variable (continuous data)

hybrid type:

– classes or bins

use variable data whenever possible!

Page 17: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Statistically in control

•Constant mean and spread

•Process-inherent variation only

•Do not intervene

Measurement

Tijd

XX

XX

X

X

X

X

XX

X

XX

X

X

XX

Intervene?

Page 18: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Statistically versus technically in control

“Statistically in

control”

– stable over

time /predictable

“Technically in control”

– within

specifications

Page 19: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Statistically in control vs technically in control

statistically controlled process:

– inhibits only natural random fluctuations (common causes)

– is stable

– is predictable

– may yield products out of specification

technically controlled process:

– presently yields products within specification

– need not be stable nor predictable

Page 20: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Priorities

what is preferable:

– statistical control or

– technically in control ??

process must first be in statistical control

Page 21: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Variation and production processes

Shewhart distinguishes two forms of variation in production

processes:

• common causes

– inherent to process

– cannot be removed, but are harmless

• special causes

– external causes

– must be detected and eliminated

Page 22: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Chance or noise

How do we detect special causes ?

use statistics to distinguish between chance and

real cause

Page 23: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Shewhart control chart

graphical display of product characteristic which is important for

product quality

X-bar Chart for yield

Subgroup

X-b

ar

0 4 8 12 16 2013,6

13,8

14

14,2

14,4

UpperControl Limit

Centre Line

Lower Control

Limit

Page 24: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Control charts

Page 25: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Why control charts?

•control charts are effective preventive device

•control charts avoid tampering of processes

•control charts yield diagnostic information

Page 26: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Basic principles

• take samples and compute statistic

• if statistic falls above UCL or below LCL, then out-of-control signal: e.g.,

X-bar Chart for yield

Subgroup

X-b

ar

0 4 8 12 16 2013,6

13,8

14

14,2

14,4

how to choose control limits?

Page 27: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Normal distribution

•often used in SPC

•“justification” by Central Limit Theorem:

– accumulation of many small errors

Page 28: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Meaning of control limits

•limits at 3 x standard deviation of plotted statistic

•basic example:

9973.0)33(

)33(

)33(

)(

ZP

XP

XP

UCLXLCLP

XX

XX

UCL

LCL

Page 29: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Example

• diameters of piston rings

• process mean: 74 mm

• process standard deviation: 0.01 mm

• measurements via repeated samples of 5 rings yields:

mmLCL

mmUCL

mmn

x

9865.73)0045.0(374

0135.74)0045.0(374

0045.05

01.0

Page 30: k Variation thinking 2WS02 Industrial Statistics A. Di Bucchianico

Specifications vs. natural tolerance limits

never put specification limits on a control chart

control chart displays inherent process variance

during trial run charts (also called tolerance chart of tier chart) often

yields useful graphical information