33
Kaizen Training 6 Step Approach

Kaizen Tools and Templates

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

kaizen

Citation preview

  • Kaizen Training

    6 Step Approach

  • 1a. PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Problem title:

    Description of problem to solve:

    Owner: Team:

    1b. QUANTIFICATION OF PROBLEM

    Conclusion from quantification analysis: Solving issue 1 would address X% of non-productive time

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    KAIZEN IS A STRUCTURED AND PROVEN PROBLEM SOLVING APPROACH WORKING EVERYWHERE

    Current outcome:

    What is excluded from the solution space:

    Target outcome:

    Issue 3Issue 2 Issue 5Issue 1 Issue 4Non-productive time

    Define problem and objectives1

    2a. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS THE FISHBONE

    Man Machine

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    2b. RANKING OF CAUSES

    Conclusion from ranking: Addressing causes A, B, C would solve X% of the issue

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    5. PROGRESS UPDATE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Action Status

    Solution A2:A ti A2 1

    Main highlights since last review

    Period:

    Main challenges

    e e p ob e a d object es

    2

    ?

    Analyze the facts

    1

    5 Implement

    6 Check and make sustainable

    --

    Environment

    Method Material Cause CCause B Cause GCause FCause E

    % of inefficiency caused

    Cause DCause A

    Action A2.1: Action A2.2:

    Solution B1: Action B1.1: Action B1.2:

    Generate potential solutions2003

    M M

    MM

    3a. IDENTIFICATION OF SOLUTIONS

    Root cause Possible solutions (title and brief description)

    Owner: Team:

    Cause A

    Cause B

    Cause C

    Solution A1 Solution A2 Solution A3

    Solution B1 Solution B2

    Solution C1 Solution C2 Solution C3 Solution C4

    Problem title: 4. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

    Action

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Responsible Start date End date Completed?

    Solution A2: Action A2.1: Action A2.2:

    Solution B1: Action B1.1: Action B1.2:

    Name Name

    NameName

    DateDate

    Date Date

    Date Date

    Date Date

    3Generate potential solutions

    4 Plan

    Get approval

    3d. APPROVALS PLAN

    Who needs to approve

    Owner: Team:

    Who is responsible for getting the approvalBy when

    Approval received

    Igor Boevski John Smith16 June 2007

    Problem title:

    3b. PRIORITISATION OF SOLUTIONS

    Do it soon Plan Legend (explanation of symbols)

    A1:

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    3c. SOLUTIONS APPROVAL TEMPLATE

    Solution title

    Owner: Team:

    Brief description Expected impact

    Required investment

    Time until capturing impact

    D

    o

    i

    t

    s

    o

    o

    n

    B1.

    A2.

    B2.

    C2.

    Problem title:

    1Low

    Effort

    High

    L

    o

    w

    I

    m

    p

    a

    c

    t

    H

    i

    g

    h

    Do if there is time Skip

    A2: A3: B1: B2: C1: C2: C3: C4:

    A1

    B2

    A3

    B1

    A2

    C1

    C2C4

    C3

    P

    l

    a

    n

    D

    o

    i

    f

    t

    h

    e

    r

    e

    i

    s

    t

    i

    m

    e

    C4.

    A1.

  • STOPPING THE BLAME GAME

    Focus on problem itself, not who caused it

    2

  • 1 PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Statement: Non Value Added time is 40%

    Bad Example: p

    Reduce the non value added time

    Good Example:

    Reduce the non value added time due to walking from 2 hours per shift to 0,5 hours per shift within one month

    KEY CRITERIAS- Describe problem specificly- Give Target

    Gi e deadline

    3

    - Give deadline

  • 1a. PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Problem title:

    Owner: Team:

    Description of problem to solve:

    Current outcome: Target outcome:Current outcome:

    What is excluded from the solution

    Target outcome:

    4

    from the solution space:

  • 1b. QUANTIFICATION OF PROBLEM

    Conclusion from

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Conclusion from quantification analysis:

    5

    NVA time _____________________________________________

  • ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS WITH THE 5 WHYs

    1. Why did the machine stop? Bearing is overheated!

    2. Why is the bearing overheated? Has too little oil!

    Man

    3. Why too little oil? Pump doesnt supply enough oil!

    4. Why doesnt the pump supply enough oil? The filter is fouled!enough oil? The filter is fouled!

    5. Why is the filter fouled? Maintenance interval too long!

    Root cause ofth bl

    6

    Maintenance interval too long! the problem

  • 2a. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS THE FISHBONE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Man Machine-

    -

    NVA time

    7

    Method Material

  • 2b. RANKING OF CAUSES

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Conclusion from ranking:

    % of NVAtime caused

    8

    Cause GCause FCause ECause DCause CCause BCause A

  • 3 SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT Speed fast / impact highSpeed slow / impact low

    Man

    Problem Primary cause Fifth cause

    Inspection criteria is inconsistent among

    High variation of criteria in determining

    CountermeasuresSpeed of implementation Impact

    Excessive time for cleaning to remove rusts

    inspectors

    Lack of ant-rust

    the occurrence of rust

    Lack of approved sample to be compared or applied

    Anti moisture indoor

    Manufacture samples and approve

    Machine facilities on the shop floor

    Cleaning brush is easily broken.

    Anti-moisture indoor shop

    Material is not flexible and easily erodable

    Use elastic and anti-erodable material

    Material A lot of holes and thick T/S Carbon material is exposed

    Tool is not suitable. The drill for manual work is revamped

    Close holes when cleaned up

    Rust may easily reoccur

    Method Rust can not be removed manuallyLack of automatic tool for exclusive use

    Contact with water when removing oil

    Change chemicals use in removing oil

    9

    A lot of dust created Apply tool using air

    Develop tools for exclusive use

  • 3 SOLUTION DEVELOPMENT Speed fast / impact highSpeed slow / impact low

    If you do a good root cause 1

    Man

    Problem Primary cause Fifth cause

    Inspection criteria is inconsistent among

    High variation of criteria in determining

    CountermeasuresSpeed of implementation Impact

    analysis, then you can easily develop solutions

    Excessive time for cleaning to remove rusts

    inspectors

    Lack of ant-rust

    the occurrence of rust

    Lack of approved sample to be compared or applied

    Anti moisture indoor

    Manufacture samples and approve

    Machine facilities on the shop floor

    Cleaning brush is easily broken.

    Anti-moisture indoor shop

    Material is not flexible and easily erodable

    Use elastic and anti-erodable materialPrioritize the solutions

    b d i t d2

    Material A lot of holes and thick T/S Carbon material is exposed

    Tool is not suitable. The drill for manual work is revamped

    Close holes when cleaned up

    based on impact and easiness

    Rust may easily reoccur

    Method Rust can not be removed manuallyLack of automatic tool for exclusive use

    Contact with water when removing oil

    Change chemicals use in removing oil

    10

    A lot of dust created Apply tool using air

    Develop tools for exclusive use

  • THINK LONG TERM

    Implementing a Band-Aid A Band-Aid is a temporary solution, to contain a problem A countermeasure must address the root cause!A countermeasure must address the root cause!

    11

  • 3a. IDENTIFICATION OF SOLUTIONS

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Root cause Possible solutions (title and brief description)

    Cause A Solution A1

    Cause B

    Solution A2 Solution A3

    Solution B1 Solution B2 Solution B3

    12

  • 3b. PRIORITISATION OF SOLUTIONS

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title: h

    Do it soon Plan Legend (explanation of symbols)

    A1 A2A1

    a

    c

    t

    H

    i

    g

    h A2 A3 B1 B2 B3

    A1

    B1A2

    B2

    w

    I

    m

    p

    a

    Do if there is time Skip B3

    L

    o

    w

    A3 B3

    13

    Low

    Effort

    High

  • 3c. SOLUTIONS APPROVAL TEMPLATE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Solution title Brief description Expected impact

    Required investment

    Time until capturing impact

    n

    A2 B2

    D

    o

    i

    t

    s

    o

    o

    n

    B2

    a

    n

    A1 B1

    P

    l

    a

    e

    r

    e

    i

    s

    A3

    14

    D

    o

    i

    f

    t

    h

    e

    t

    i

    m

    e

  • 3d. APPROVALS PLAN

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Who needs to approveWho is responsible for getting the approvalBy when

    Approval receivedpp g g ppy

    15

  • 4. PLAN WITH APPROVAL

    Action RESPONSIBLEDEADLINEApproval received

    1 2

    Order new pipe Maintenance Engineer16 Feb 2008

    Train new operator 10 Feb 2008 Supervisor

    Review SOP 12 Feb 2008 Team with Prod. Mgr.

    Approved by

    16

    Igor Boevski

  • 4. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Action Responsible Start date End date Completed?

    A i A1 1 N D DAction A1.1 Name Date Date Action A1.2 Name Date Date

    Action B1.1 Action B1.2

    Approved by

    17

    Igor Boevski

  • STEP 5: IMPLEMENT THE SOLUTIONSTEP 6: SUSTAIN

    SUSTAINIMPLEMENT

    TELLTRAINMONITORCHECK

    18

  • 5. PROGRESS UPDATE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Action Status Main highlights since last review

    Period:

    Main challengesg

    Action A1.1

    Action A1 2

    Action B1.1

    Action A1.2

    Action B1 2Action B1.2

    19

  • Problem SolvingProblem Solving

    20

  • Trees should be mathematical correct EXAMPLE

    QC tests for raw materials from other Company sites

    Examples

    Avoid double testing

    1

    QC

    ? What is wrong?

    Use random sampling

    Install automatic testing in production

    Combine batches in onedelivery from supplierto one batch for sampling

    Perform real-time measurement of selected

    2

    3Reduce number

    Reduce number of samples per batch

    +

    +

    testing in production

    Reduce number of repeats

    R d b f

    Reduce costs of testing

    parameters

    Establish robustness oftest to eliminate double-testing of samples

    Reduce aspiration level

    4

    number of tests

    Reduce number of tests per samplex

    +

    +5

    Eliminate activities

    Reduce number of independent tests

    Reduce costs per

    testing

    Reduce quality

    Reduce aspiration level

    Install data base to automatically coordinate process changes

    6

    samplex

    ?Increase efficiency

    Eliminate activities

    costs per test

    R d t f

    Reduce quality control cost Replace newer technology

    Transfer test results electronically to external

    7

    8

    + ?

    21

    Increase efficiency

    Reduce costs of supporting tasks

    yparties

    Create order database for tests outside regular supply chain (e.g., R&D)

    9?

  • Empty templatesEmpty templates

    22

  • 1a. PROBLEM DEFINITION

    Problem title:

    Owner: Team:

    Description of problem to solve:

    Current outcome: Target outcome:Current outcome:

    What is excluded from the solution

    Target outcome:

    23

    from the solution space:

  • 1b. QUANTIFICATION OF PROBLEM

    Conclusion from

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Conclusion from quantification analysis:

    24

    _________ _____________________________________________

  • 2a. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS THE FISHBONE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Man Machine-

    -

    NVA time

    25

    Method Material

  • 2b. RANKING OF CAUSES

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Conclusion from ranking:

    % of ________ caused

    26

    Cause GCause FCause ECause DCause CCause BCause A

  • 3a. IDENTIFICATION OF SOLUTIONS

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Root cause Possible solutions (title and brief description)

    _____________ ______________ ______________ ______________

    27

  • 3b. PRIORITISATION OF SOLUTIONS

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title: h

    Do it soon Plan Legend (explanation of symbols)

    a

    c

    t

    H

    i

    g

    h

    w

    I

    m

    p

    a

    Do if there is time Skip

    L

    o

    w

    28

    Low

    Effort

    High

  • 3c. SOLUTIONS APPROVAL TEMPLATE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Solution title Brief description Expected impact

    Required investment

    Time until capturing impact

    n

    ______

    D

    o

    i

    t

    s

    o

    o

    n

    a

    n

    ______

    P

    l

    a

    e

    r

    e

    i

    s

    ______

    29

    D

    o

    i

    f

    t

    h

    e

    t

    i

    m

    e

  • 3d. APPROVALS PLAN

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Who needs to approveWho is responsible for getting the approvalBy when

    Approval receivedpp g g ppy

    30

  • 4. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Action Responsible Start date End date Completed?

    ____________ _______ _______ ______

    31

  • 5. PROGRESS UPDATE

    Owner: Team:

    Problem title:

    Action Status Main highlights since last review

    Period:

    Main challengesg

    _________

    _________

    _________

    _________

    32