10

Kanzi used symbols to represent objects and actions

  • Upload
    porter

  • View
    48

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

1. Describe how Kanzi’s communication skills fulfill each of the four critical properties of language. Kanzi used symbols to represent objects and actions He and the psychologists understood a shared semantic system (“meanings”) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions
Page 2: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

1. Describe how Kanzi’s communication skills fulfill

each of the four critical properties of language. 1. Describe how Kanzi’s communication skills fulfill

each of the four critical properties of language. • Kanzi used symbols to represent

objects and actions• He and the psychologists

understood a shared semantic system (“meanings”)

• He generated thousands of combinations (many of them spontaneous)

• He seemed to follow grammar rules, and understood how word order changed the meaning of a sentence

• Kanzi used symbols to represent objects and actions

• He and the psychologists understood a shared semantic system (“meanings”)

• He generated thousands of combinations (many of them spontaneous)

• He seemed to follow grammar rules, and understood how word order changed the meaning of a sentence

Page 3: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

2. Summarize Steven Pinker’s argument for

the evolutionary basis of human language. 2. Summarize Steven Pinker’s argument for

the evolutionary basis of human language. • Language is a species-specific

trait produced by natural selection

• Communication has adaptive value

• A small advantage to survival can increase that trait in populations in a relatively short amount of time (by evolutionary standards)

• Language is a species-specific trait produced by natural selection

• Communication has adaptive value

• A small advantage to survival can increase that trait in populations in a relatively short amount of time (by evolutionary standards)

Page 4: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

Behaviorist Theories

Behaviorist Theories

• Skinner (1957)• Claims language is acquired

through imitation, reinforcement, and other conditioning principles

• When language and syntax are understood, children are understood and gets what they need (rewarded)

• Skinner (1957)• Claims language is acquired

through imitation, reinforcement, and other conditioning principles

• When language and syntax are understood, children are understood and gets what they need (rewarded)

Page 5: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

Nativist Theories Nativist Theories• Noam Chomsky (1959, 1965)• Children have an inborn propensity

to develop language • They learn the rules of language,

not specific verbal responses• Humans are equipped with a

language acquisition device – innate process that facilitates the learning of language

• Language development is similar across very different cultures

• Noam Chomsky (1959, 1965)• Children have an inborn propensity

to develop language • They learn the rules of language,

not specific verbal responses• Humans are equipped with a

language acquisition device – innate process that facilitates the learning of language

• Language development is similar across very different cultures

Page 6: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

Interactionist TheoriesInteractionist Theories

• Biology and experience both make important contributions to language development

• Language is part of cognitive development

• Social communication plays a large role

• Emergentist theories examine the growth of neural networks that emerge in response to experience

• Biology and experience both make important contributions to language development

• Language is part of cognitive development

• Social communication plays a large role

• Emergentist theories examine the growth of neural networks that emerge in response to experience

Page 7: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

4. What evidence did B. L. Whorf present to

support the linguistic relativity hypothesis? 4. What evidence did B. L. Whorf present to

support the linguistic relativity hypothesis? • One’s language determines

the nature of one’s thought

• Based on observation, he claimed that Eskimo language had many words for snow, and thus they perceive snow differently than English-speaking people

• One’s language determines the nature of one’s thought

• Based on observation, he claimed that Eskimo language had many words for snow, and thus they perceive snow differently than English-speaking people

Page 8: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

5. What are some criticisms of his reasoning? 5. What are some criticisms of his reasoning? • Did not do systematic

cross-cultural comparisons of perceptual processes

• Overestimated the number of Eskimo words for snow

• Ignored the variety of English words for snow

• Did not do systematic cross-cultural comparisons of perceptual processes

• Overestimated the number of Eskimo words for snow

• Ignored the variety of English words for snow

Page 9: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

6. How did Eleanor Rosch’s work refute

Whorf’s hypothesis? 6. How did Eleanor Rosch’s work refute

Whorf’s hypothesis? • Examined color perception

• Compared the Dani of New Guinea (who only have terms for two basic colors) to English speakers

• Found no difference in their abilities to perceive and learn the names of colors

• Examined color perception

• Compared the Dani of New Guinea (who only have terms for two basic colors) to English speakers

• Found no difference in their abilities to perceive and learn the names of colors

Page 10: Kanzi used  symbols  to represent objects and actions

7. What is the weaker version of the

linguistic relativity hypothesis? 7. What is the weaker version of the

linguistic relativity hypothesis? • A given language

makes certain ways of thinking easier or more difficult

• A given language makes certain ways of thinking easier or more difficult