Upload
lorina-navarro
View
90
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kayvayvanan Under Fire 1
Kayvayvanan Under Fire: The Challenges of Cooperative Cogon Roofbuilding in Barangay Chavayan
“Building the Ivatan traditional house
is tedious and difficult. So as in his
contest with the soil, he resorts to his
trusted labor cooperatives such as the
kayvayvanan or kapañidungan. Thus,
every single Ivatan home is literally the
work of the community.”
Florentino H. Hornedo, 2000, p. 9
In the northernmost tip of the Philippine archipelago lies a group
of islands seemingly isolated from the rest. Characterized
by its heavy winds, crushing waves, huge rock formations and
sloping hills, Batanes is known for its natural beauty and also its
environmental pressures. For the Ivatans, the residents of these
islands, these are the conditions that have continuously shaped
their lives for centuries. At the same time, the Ivatans have also
devised ways to cope with their living environments.
The island of Sabtang is only one of the three inhabited
islands in Batanes. It is also the home to six barangays, including
Barangay Chavayan, which was nominated in the UNESCO
World Heritage list for its stone houses, with walls made of
lime (amud) and stones and with thatched roofs made out of
cogon (vuchid), a type of grass that grows in the area. A defining
feature of Batanes, these stone houses are the living vestiges
of the Ivatans’ adaptive history against the strong winds that
continue to ravage the islands and the extreme heat and cold
experienced during the different seasons.
However, what is considered by many as the traditional
Ivatan home was not a local invention. In fact, it was during the
18th century when the Spaniards introduced the technology of
using mortar made out of lime and sand for their stone walls
(Hornedo, 2000). Prior to this, the Ivatans lived in low houses
with cogon walls and roofs called jinjin, which were constructed
on cliffside settlements. As early as the 19th century, galvanized
iron (G.I.) roofs were introduced to Batanes, and in the second
decade of the 20th century, cement buildings were being adopted
for public buildings (Hidalgo, 1996). Soon enough, houses with
G.I. roofs and concrete structures coexisted with the lime-and-
stone houses.
Because of the introduction of these new materials, the
traditional stone houses started dwindling in numbers in Basco,
the main municipality of Batanes, which is almost overridden by
more “modern” forms of housing, while most of the remaining
stone houses are found in Sabtang Island. The barangay of
Chavayan does not seem immune to these developments
By Lorina Navarro, Francis Ramirez, Alejandro Sugatain
Photo Credits: Alejandro Sugatain, Claudia Rivera and Lorina Navarro
Kayvayvanan Under Fire 2
either. When we first arrived there, we noticed a handful
of houses built with materials transported from Luzon such
as galvanized iron and concrete. Second-story houses with
whitewashed walls pop out in the distance. Hybrid byproducts
of traditional and modern architectural styles are also becoming
a common sight – stone walls with galvanized iron roofs, cement
walls with cogon roofs, stone walls plastered with cement, etc.
While the main structures of the Ivatan home, namely the rakuh
(living room house), rahawung (shed used to store firewood,
farm equipment, etc.) and the kusina (kitchen) are generally
still followed, what moves the residents of Chavayan to change
their roofs is a compelling issue. This question is raised
especially in the light of the
supposed advantages that cogon
roofs have over galvanized iron
and cement roofs such as in
durability, coolness and cost.
Why do people change their
roofs? Moreover, what affects
their decisions to change them?
In weighing the factors that
may influence the Ichavayans,
it is also important to note that the
practice of housebuilding in Batanes presumes the involvement
of the whole community fostered by a bayanihan-type
cooperative system called kayvayvanan. Kayvayvanan, literally
meaning “friendship”, is chiefly used for building the foundation
of a house and also in pag-aatep (constructing the roof). It is
built on principle of reciprocation, that is one provides work for
another person, who in turn, will give back the same amount
of labor (Hornedo, 2000). Aside from being a cooperative
system, kayvayvanan is also a formal organization with a body
of members including elected officers. Kabisilya is the term
used to refer to the head of kayvayvanan. The other officers of
the organization include a secretary who is in charge of keeping
track of the attendance and the contributions of each member
and another officer called kamangelkaman, who is in charge
of making the baratay or the ladder used for climbing the roof,
removing the roof, and making sure that there is food to be
served.
Like any other organization, there are rules to be
followed once you are listed as a member of the kayvayvanan.
First is the mandatory contribution to be made per member
as determined by the kabisilya. This includes the materials
for housebuilding – the cogon which can be primarily taken from
the chamantad (farm) or the ahad (mountains). In building a
roof, the kayvayvanan provides one-half of the cogon while
The researchers pose with a tool called a pantuan. It is used to measure cogon bundles. Photo credits: Lorina Navarro
Uncle Domingo Gallo in the process of building the supporting structures for his rahawung, which was designed to become an extension of his home. Photo credits: Claudia Rivera
Kayvayvanan Under Fire 3
the owner is responsible for the other half and also the other
necessary materials such as bamboo and lumber (kayu). Aside
from the mountains, cogon is also commercially available in the
adjacent barangay, Barangay Savidug. Chintuan refers to the
unit of measurement used for seven to eight bundles of
cogon. A wooden tool called pantuan is used to determine
one chintuan. One chintuan is usually sold for around 300
to 350 pesos. It takes around 300 to 500 bundles of cogon to
build an average-sized Ivatan house. In case all the bundles
of cogon are bought, the house will cost around 15,000 pesos.
Each member also has to serve for a fixed number of
hours. Members of the kayvayvanan for the rakuh have to work for
eight hours while members of the kayvayvanvan for the kitchen
have to work for seven hours. The difference in the membership
depends from the material of the roof. One of our informants
explains that his rakuh is no longer included in kayvayvanan
because his roof is made out of galvanized iron, but his kusina
is still included because of its cogon construction.
In order to belong to the kayvayvanan, you must first
introduce yourself to the community. As mentioned, there
are those who do not consider themselves members of the
kayvayvanan, such as the newcomers who have just moved into
Chavayan, and those who do not need the assistance of the
kayvayvanan in building and maintaining their houses. A member
in need of the assistance of the kayvayvanan presents his
case to the kabisilya, whose role is also to determine whether
a roof needs replacing or not. He also decides how much cogon
is needed for the house to be built. Finally, he calls the
kayvayvanan to assemble whenever a house needs to be
constructed.
In general, around 25 people are needed in raising
a roof. One or two members from each household usually
help out in this activity. The men of the community build the roof
while the women pass the materials used for the roof or tie
up the cogon. One of our informants remarked that in the
case of housebuilding, it is harmful for the women’s health to
handle the apog (limestone) especially if they are pregnant.
There is no monetary payment involved in kayvayvanan,
although the owner of the house normally provides the food
and refreshments for the workers. When the roof is constructed
late in the day, the owner can even offer gin. The owner can
also hold roof construction on the same day of his birthday and
slaughter a pig for the guests and members of the kayvayvanan,
hitting two birds with one stone. A cogon roof can last for around
25 years before it is replaced as opposed to galvanized iron’s
one- to five-year lifespan. In case of roof repairs, however, the
kayvayvanan need not be called,
but the owners can work on them by
patching up the cogon (seksekan),
asking for assistance from friends
and relatives or hiring skilled
laborers.
In spite of the consensus that
cogon is more economical and
durable than the alternatives, why
do people still switch to cement and galvanized iron? Most of the
reasons given by our informants indicate that this is more from
practicality than anything else. At present, there is a shortage
in the supply of cogon. At the chamantad where the cogon is
grown, there are several adversaries. For one, the area is used
as a pasture by some of the locals, who need the cogon as
fodder for their goats. Aside from this, cogon is also burned
down allegedly to get rid of pests. Unlike other “crops” cogon
is not actively planted but is allowed to grow on its own so
that after one year people can harvest it. It comes as no
surprise that people look for other sources of roofing due to the
shortage. One of the more popular sources of alternatives is
galvanized iron sheets. Ten feet of galvanized iron costs around
300 pesos as opposed to the 300 pesos per one chintuan
“Kung wala ka ng
pagkukunan ng
cogon, edi umisip ka
ng paraan.”
Mariano Gecha,
kabisilya
Kayvayvanan Under Fire 4
bundle of cogon. In addition to the decrease in costs, it is also
much easier to assemble galvanized iron in terms of labor and
resources. If someone wants to put up a makeshift rahawung in
a hurry galvanized iron roofing becomes an expedient choice as
it is cheap and its construction requires one person at the least.
On the downside, galvanized iron is easy to rust in Chavayan’s
seaside environment unless repainted annually, and it is also
vulnerable to storms. Alternatively, others choose cement houses
because in terms of maintenance, they say they require the
least amount of work, but they are also the most expensive to
build (P319 per bag of cement). Although it is more dangerous
in cases of earthquakes, you don’t have to regularly replace
it, it is very durable against storms, and it is very unlikely
to be infested with termites. With a cogon roof, if poorly
constructed, it is possible that there will be leaks, you have to
constantly repair damaged parts, and it can be vulnerable to
storms. In this case, the practice among Ivatans is to carefully
fasten their cogon roofs with rattan and cover them with a rope
net (sagep).
It may seem that changing the roof material affects
the social structure of Chavayan in the sense that one of its
community practices is becoming less frequent in favor of more
individualistic forms of housebuilding, and many have in fact
denied membership in the kayvayvanan because of their roof
types. Cogon is very critical to maintaining the kayvayvanan,
as this organization is almost always associated with cogon
roofbuilding although it has also shown flexibility towards
constructing cement roofs. Some of our informants have
mentioned that cement houses, which are costly in terms of
labor and especially capital, can still be a part of kayvayvanan
so long as the owner still provides the materials for the house.
In this new scenario, however, the materials are no longer freely
taken and given, and money has entered the equation. Thus
the reciprocal obligations and relationships derived from cogon
construction are less clearly stated.
In spite of the new housebuilding technology and
practices, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the sense of
community in Barangay Chavayan is dying out. It manifests itself
in cooperative practices
outside the organization
of kayvayvanan. This
is evident in observed
practices of the residents
seeking to help out if
necessary, kayvayvanan or
none, such as in the pabaha, which occurs when a non-member
of the kayvayvanan, such as an owner of a galvanized iron roof,
chooses to freely lend his help in cogon housebuilding. Outside
the practice of roof construction, there are other forms of self-
help traditions such as the payuhwan, which involves close
friends performing smaller scale farm jobs (Hornedo, 2000).
There are also other types of cooperatives not explored in our
paper such as for fishing and boat-making.
Practicality aside, the kayvayvanan, as set of relations
and practices is a also tradition rife with symbolic meanings,
reinforcing community-wide reciprocal relationships and
values while pursuing the need to adapt to the environmental
conditions. Through housebuilding, we get a glimpse of the
Ichavayan’s indigenous knowledge of architecture, including
each detail of the support structures of a house. Unfortunately,
much of the knowledge and relationships derived from this
practice are compromised, much like the reserves of cogon
after they were razed and exploited. In the supposed problem
of the changing roofs from the locally gathered to the externally
procured materials, it is therefore very pressing to address the
sustainability of the cogon resources in relation to preserving
the definitive trait of Chavayan – not merely their stone houses
but more importantly their spirit of community.
“Indeed, their world view of
houses and human settlement has
evolved, without rejecting the
indigenous.”
Cesar A. Hidalgo, 2006, p. 393
ReferencesHidalgo, C.A. (1996). The making of the Ivatans: The cultural history of
Batanes. Pasig, Metro Manila: Cognita TRC.Hornedo, F.H. (2000). Taming the wind: Ethno-cultural history on the Ivatan of
the Batanes isles. Manila, Philippines: University of Santo Tomas Pub. House.
Navarro, C.M. (2009). Batanes: Cooperative practices of its people. QuezonCity: Giraffe.
This article is based on the paper “Raising the Roof: Investigating the Reasons
behind the Changing Roofs in Chavayan” by Navarro et. al originally submitted
for the course Anthro 196 (Field Methods in Social Anthropology) under Edwin
Valientes of the University of the Philippines Department of Anthropology.