27
Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice Group [email protected]

Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Kent Housing Group3rd February 2011

The Implications of the

Spending Review and

Emerging Policy for

Housing

Chris CobboldDirector of Housing Practice [email protected]

Page 2: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The Policy Deluge

The Abolition of the RSSs

New Homes Bonus

Local Standards Framework

The Spending Review

Local Growth

Page 3: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The Policy Deluge

Local Decisions – Social Housing

LA Financial Settlement

Localism Bill

Self financing for Council Housing

...etc

...etc

Page 4: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The RSS Boomerang

July – the RSSs revoked

160,000 homes ditched

300,000 by end of 2011

Revocation ‘unlawful’

Localism Bill published

Inter-regnum

Page 5: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Planning for Housing without the RSS

Local Plans have to be ‘sound’

Sub-Regional Market analysis

Key Elements of Analysis Economic Drivers Demographic Drivers Housing Need Land Supply – Capacity

Where are you in the LDF process?

Page 6: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The New Homes Bonus

Average Council Tax

Band D = c£1,440

Paid a year in arrears...

...for 6 years

Plus £350 for each affordable home

New homes and empties

Page 7: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The New Homes Bonus – what is it worth?

250 homes pa

£1,400 pa

£350k in 2012-13

Grows by £350k pa

By 2017-18 receive £2.1 m

Page 8: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Issues

Managing community expectation

Expenditure outside CSR Period

Impact of a change of government?

Borrow against anticipated income?

Potential to forward fund infrastructure

How much additionality?

Page 9: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The Local Standards Framework

Building regulations and standards

Simplification and standardisation

A menu approach

Housebuilders and LAs to work together

An agreed Local Standards Framework

National Planning Policy Framework 2012

Page 10: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

The Spending Review – the NAHP

CSR 2008-11 CSR 2011-14

No. of Years 3 4

Funding in £bn 9.0 4.5

Funding pa in £bn 3.0 1.125

Dwellings Target 153,176 up to 150,000

Public cost per dwelling

£59,000 £30,000

Existing commitments on NAHP - £2.4 bn

Page 11: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Affordable Rent from 2011

Up to 80% of market rents

Shorter term tenancies

New development and empties

Re-lets can be changed to AR

New ‘Flexible Tenancy’

The Affordable Rent Programme

Page 12: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Opportunities and Challenges

Stretches NAHP resource

Enhanced RP borrowing

Impact on scheme viability

Social rent

Impact on HB budget

Different providers

Page 13: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Other Features of the Spending Review

£2 bn for Decent Homes

Reform of the HRA Borrow against rental streams? For repairs, improvements, new building Link to prudential borrowing? New housing on LA land

£100 m for Empty Homes 3000 homes £33k per home

Page 14: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Other Features of the Spending Review

DFGs £720 m Not ring fenced

Preventing Homelessness - £357 m

£200 m for continuation of Mortgage Rescue Scheme

£6.5bn for Supporting People

Page 15: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential

Tax Increment Finance Mixed use regeneration

Local Enterprise Partnerships Role in strategic planning ‘Transport, housing and planning’ ‘strategic housing delivery.... ...pooling, aligning funding streams’!

Business Increase Bonus

Business Rate Retention

Page 16: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Reform of Planning

Presumption in favour of sustainable development

Communities ‘centre stage’ in planning

Neighbourhood Plans

Right to Build

Streamlined Local Development Plans

Streamlined National Planning Framework

Page 17: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Regional Growth Fund

£1.4 bn over 4 years

Objectives Stimulate enterprise and private sector jobs Focus on areas over dependent on public sector jobs

Includes infrastructure investment...

... ‘to improve housing supply

Round 1 bids emphasis on jobs

Page 18: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Local Decisions: A fairer future for Social Housing

New tenure for Affordable Rent Fixed period Continuation subject to review

Broader tenancy options for LAs Existing secure tenants unaffected Flexible Tenancy option for LA relets Time limited, minimum 2 years

LAs to prepare Tenancy Strategy

New Tenancy Standard

Page 19: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Local Decisions: A fairer future for Social Housing

Management of waiting lists

Foster mobility of social tenants

House people in the PRS

Regulation of social housing

Reform of the HRA

Page 20: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Self Financing for Council Housing

HRAs to be run as social businesses

Move to self financing by April 2012– step 1 – value the business– step 2 – estimate current housing debt– step 3a – surplus value paid to the government– step 3b – surplus debt paid off by government

Rental growth formula specified

Controls on HRA borrowing

Freedoms to dispose of assets

But 75% of RTB receipts to HMT

Page 21: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

To summarise: Affordable Housing

Less money

More flexibility

Greater scope for innovation

New forms of provider

Increased local decision making

Greater diversity of provision

Page 22: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

To summarise: Planning

Enhanced uncertainty

Push LDFs forward

Establish new evidence base

Work sub-regionally

Unlikely to deliver more housing

Page 23: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Page 23

Page 24: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Page 25

Mortgage Availability and Cost – significant constraints continue on mortgage lending

Volume of Mortgage ApprovalsAugust 2001 – Aug 2010

Value of Mortgage Approvals August 2001 – Aug2010

Page 25: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Page 26

Current Position: The market remains subdued by historic standards

Index of Sales Volumes 4 Quarter moving average: Prime London defined as Kensington & Chelsea, Westminster and Camden Boroughs

Page 26: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Page 27

Conclusion

Local Authorities and their partners are going to have to work harder still to get the homes their

communities need

The Kent ForumHousing Strategy identifies what needs to be done

Page 27: Kent Housing Group 3 rd February 2011 The Implications of the Spending Review and Emerging Policy for Housing Chris Cobbold Director of Housing Practice

Questions and Comments