Key to America

7/29/2019 Key to America

1/48

Key to Americas Republics

As you read the following, keep aware of Mark Twains paraphrasing of a Rule of Law"maxim#, Truthis stranger than fiction, for fiction must at least seem reasonable. The following discussion isthoroughly documented from original law books and some court decisions. An extensive list oforiginal sources is appended for authentication. No arbitrary nor unfounded statements arepresented. the following is distilled to the absolute essence from four decades of independentresearch and collecting law books spanning at least five centuries. The following is currently and hasin the recent past been successfully used in court cases % you wont learn about them from themedia! As Joe Trippi wrote during the 2004 presidential campaign, The Revolution Will Not BeTelevised. The following has been and is still being suppressed bythe powers that be. So, let thescales fall from your eyes.

Error artfully disguised (colored, fraud, misrepresentation) is, in many instances, more probable thannaked truth; and frequently error overwhelms truth by its show of reason. 2 Coke, 73;

The quickest and most effective means of ending governmental abuses or any undesired oroppressive acts is by severing their funding. One Principle upon which Americas War forIndependence from England was engaged, Taxation without Representation. Since only U.S.citizens "see true definition below# have the privilege of voting in our contemporary professedpolitical elections, American natives, or Native Americans, ss. Americans, all three of which areidentical terms "see Websters Dictionary, 1828 Edition, quoted below#, cannot be represented inthe current political bodies controlling America today: Hence, by American Law, Americans cannotbe taxed by those entities currently in control; Another equally vital Principle upon which AmericasWar for Independence was fought, the sacredness of private property lawfully obtained throughOnes Labor; And, that all Things private cannot be taxed being superior to all governmentalbodies, having existed precedent. Furthermore, ownership of private property is a Right guaranteedand secured by Americas Declaration of Independence and Constitution % No Right may betaxed! See infra That inherent Principle to American Government is expressly engineered byAmericas Founders to deliberately limit the size and power of government at every level bydeliberatelylimiting governmentsaccess to funds. That is easier than might at first appear, but itdoes take courage and persistence. The Supreme Court of the United States has repeatedly ruledthat the receipts from Ones labor is private property and cannot be lawfully taxed. There are atleast sixteen"16# such decisions spanning at least eighty years: see infra. The first steps follow:

The two keys to unlocking American freedom are lawful establishment of ownership of real and

chattel properties; and, divorcing ones self and family from the unlawful concept of U.S.citizenship, see below.The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred asthe laws of God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it,

anarchy and tyranny commence. John Adams;

No where within the American Constitution is the term U.S. citizen used or implied. Neither isthat term used by Americas Founders nor by American Law scholars and judiciary throughout the18th- and 19th centuries. Noah Webster provides clear explanations in His American Dictionary ofthe English Language..., First Edition "1828# at His entries for American and Native, see below.

Americans do not own any property of value, ss. land and substantial chattels which retainmarketable value and utility, particularlymotor vehicles. The two major contributing factors to theDilemma are: no Knowledge of the law of contracts and due process of law: which means

simply knowing the correct forms for certain necessary instruments for certain interactions and thecorrect series of steps for accomplishing the correct instruments in the correct sequence to achievethe desired goal, as well as correct English grammar and vocabulary; e.g., one of the most popularexpressions used by Americans for at least the last half-century is, You know what I mean.

Ownership of land under American Law cannot be properly and fully conveyed by WarrantyDeed; Land is properly and fully conveyed by Deed in fee simple, ss. Freehold. Ownership- ortitle in fee simple is erroneously known throughout the so-called patriot movement as allodialtitle. Americans do not know how to properly claim their land under American Law to perfect"complete# title conveyancing of the land they wish to buy and own. Remember, your Freehold isyour Freedom. Without a Freehold one is in one manner or another bounden to others.

Page 1


2/48

Ownership of motor vehicles under American Law necessitates possessing the ManufacturersCertificate of Origin, also known as Manufacturers Statement of Origin"MSO#. Most Americansare utterly unaware such an instrument even exists, let alone its significance! The new-car dealers,banks, attorneys, and DMV take pains to suppress knowledge of its existence from the people-at-large, because without that instrument in ones possession one does not and can not prove onelegally owns that car. Recognize: A Certificate of Title issued byDMV is not proof one ownsthat car, it merely states a title exists somewhere "which is another lie because it was destroyeddeliberately byDMV upon delivery in that agency#. Sections 501 and 502 ofTexas Transportation

Code expressly state that onlystate-owned motor vehicles may have certificates of title; andonly state-owned motor vehicles are required to be registered; and only state-owned motorvehicles are required to be inspected; andonlystate-owned motor vehicles are required to havelicense or registration plates on them; and only state-owned motor vehicles are required tohave insurance and only state-owned motor vehicles are required to comply with TexasTransportation Code; andonlyoperators ofstate-owned motor vehicles are required to have aDriverLicense; andonlystate-owned motor vehicles are required to obeyspeed limit signs,&c., &c. &c. : See separate article entitled, Car Titles. Also, go to the State of Texas legislature website and download the Texas Transportation Code to verify the foregoing statements. Allstatetransportation codes contain the same clauses!

Lawful marriage, known as Holy matrimony, wedlock, has not existed within America sincebefore World War II! It is a solemn occasion, sealed instrument, known biblically, at law, and

in equity as acovenant

, the highest-level

contract

existing. A

common law marriage

isnot the same as alawful marriage, marriage at law, wedlock, Holy matrimony: It is a

Patriot Myth in codes rensnaring the uninformed into ade facto fictitious jurisdiction!

To live within the Republic, one must unequivocally exercise due process of law, thatextends to marriages and births as with all affairs of life on earth. That is not complex: Itmerely entails executing a lawful affidavit under seal. Rarely use a Notary Public. They, bydefinition, only handle commercial documents. None of the professed clergy, or judiciary,today are competent to perform lawful marriages and births. They are all compromised bytheir 501"c# 3 Non-profit status or their municipal corporate employee status, i.e. merchants-in-commerce. A state-issued Marriage License is one peculiar form of businessassociation invented by the de facto government after W.W.I making the state andthis state the senior partner in the arrangement, such being your daily affairs, children"CPS#, and properties.

Now, carefully read the following definition from the Supreme Court of the United States:

Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified asproperty and franchises of the federal government as anindividual entity.

Wheeling Steel Corp. vs. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773;

Please fully appreciate the significance and impact of that blunt definition. By fully comprehendingwhat the Supreme Court is stating, one will finally appreciate the trap in which he or she is bound;and why America is in such shambles and confusion. Now you know why when you happen to bedragged into one of those so-called courts you have no standing, obtain no justice, and getrailroaded!

A right not vested in a person living, but merely exists in the consideration andcontemplation of law, is said to be in abeyance. Co. Litt. 342;

Now, compare with Webster, 1828:POLITICAL, a. (Etymology omitted.) ...2. Pertaining to a nation or state, or to nations orstates, as distinguished from civilormunicipal; as in the phrase, politicaland civilrights, theformer comprehending rights that belong to a nation, or perhaps to a citizen as an individualof a nation; and the latter comprehending the local rights of acorporationor any memberof it.....4. Artful; skillful. (SeePolitic.)... (Emphases in bold type added);

POLITICIAN,n. (FR.politicien.) ...A man of artifice or deep contrivance. Smith.

AMERICAN, n. A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants ofEuropeans born in America.

Page 2


3/48

NATIVE, n. One born in any place is said to be anative of that place, whether country, cityor town. 2. Offspring.

And,PERSONATE, v. t. To represent by a fictitious or assumed character so as to pass for theperson represented. Bacon.2. To represent by action or appearance; to assume the character and act the part of another.3. To pretend hypocritically. (Littleused.)4. To counterfeit; to feign; as a personated devotion. Hammond.

5. To resemble. The lofty cedar personates thee. Shak.6. To make a representation of, as in picture. Obs. Shak.7. To describe. Obs. Shak.8. To celebrate loudly. (L.persono.) (Notused). Milton.PERSONATE, a. (L. persona, a mask.) Masked. A personate corol is irregular and closedby a kind of palate; or ringent, but closed between the lips by the palate. Smith. Linne.PERSONATION,n. The counterfeiting of the person and character of another. Bacon.

PERSONATOR,n. One who assumes the character of another.B. Jonson.2. One that acts or performs. B. Jonson.

PERSONIFICATION, n. (from personify.) The giving to an inanimate being the figure orthe sentiments and language of a rational being; prosopopia; as, confusion heard his voice

Milton.

PERSONIFY, v. t. (L. persona and facio.) To give animation to inanimate objects; to ascribeto an inanimate being the sentiments, actions or language of a rational being or person, or torepresent an inanimate being with the affections and actions of a person. Thus we say, theplants thirst for rain.

The treessaidto fig-tree, come thou, and reign over us. Judges ix.

IMPERSONATE, v. t. To personify. Warton.Always remember, under American, and English, Common Law an attorney at law cannot practicein courts of law; That right is reserved for the people-at-large with their counselors. The ancientterm counselor at law is reserved for only those who have demonstrated competence of knowledgein American Common Law. Attorneys at law may only represent fictitious entities, such ascorporations or trusts. A living breathing man, known as a natural person in law, cannot berepresented because he truly exists and can physically appear of his own volition. A corporation or

other fictitious entity being an abstraction, or in law terms,in contemplation of law

, cannot everphysically appear any where at any time for any reason. Hence, attorneys may only play in the

corporate fantasy world. Chief Justice Mansfield was quoted as stating,Every one has a right to an advocate (assistance of counsel); but, hiring an attorney issomething quite different.

Also hold dear the following from American Law,

The Attorney is an Officer of the Court, his first duty is to the courts..., not to hisclient. (Emphasis added.) 7 Corpus Juris Secundum, 4, pg. 802; Also see, Bouviers andBlacks Law,older editions) dictionaries;

By merely learning the above simple material facts, one may take certain simple measures to undothe web of deception and return to the original free America, several republics, established duringthe late 18th Century.

Things invalid from the beginning, cannot be made valid by subsequent acts.Tray. Max. 482; Bouv. 2155;

The work is simple, but it is tedious and methodical and cannot be accomplished overnight notusing one instrument. One absolutely must be willing to defend his or her Liberty, Life, and Propertyagainst allallegations of every nature and persist until victory in the process of breaking out ofTheMatrix.

I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves,and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesomediscretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion. ThomasJefferson;

Page 3


4/48


5/48

DueProcessofLaw

There is nothing more terrifying than ignorance in action. Goethe;

It profits little to know what ought to be done, if you do not know how it is to be done.2 Inst. 503;

We are ignorant of many things which would not be hidden from us if the reading of old authors wasfamiliar to us. 10 Coke, 73;

If a man abuse an authority given him by the law, he becomes a trespasserabinitio. 8 Coke, 146;

You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed orrestrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe.

John Adams;

Absolutely everything has a particular Due Process of Law. Our ancestors were educated, prudent,reasonable, careful and methodical men. Process, or procedure, is important for conductingreasonable and prudent intercourse with others during daily living in this realm. They keptmeticulous records so that their affairs could be easily reconstructed, quickly and justly settled at anymoment. In short, they were responsible men % Responsible for their conduct whether social orpolitical or financial. They did not allow television to distract them from their obligations. Theirperspective was that conducting their daily affairs honorably, reasonably, prudently, was required aspartial compliance with the Holy Scriptures. In their private, as well as, public writings they readilyquoted or paraphrased Scripture, Cicero, Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare and other ancient authors;

they all spoke and wrote Latin fluently, and usually one or more additional languages other thanAmerican English. Some were educated within England and Scotland, others within America at whatare today known as the Ivy League schools. They all continued their education by self-studythroughout their lives. Do not let their great accomplishments intimidate you % perseverance andabsolute faith in the AlmightyOne are the only tools necessary to succeed. Always remember thecommon law is simple, reasonable, prudent.Any typical 8th-grade student can readily become accomplished at common law without difficulty.The common law is common to all. Law, like moral philosophy or politics, has its maxims which sumup in a pregnant sentence some leading principle or axiom of law; ...The merit of the maxim istwofold. It is a useful generalisation of law wherein every student who would become his gown maynote, as Wingate says, how the same key opens many locks, or, to put it in another way, how all thecases are reducible to a few theses. The other merit of the maxim lies in its epigrammatic form. Likethe proverb, it embodies the wisdom of many and the wit of one. These qualities of the maxim%its

sententiousness and it epigrammatic point%have made it at all times a favourite form of legalcurrency, tendered and accepted generally%or, to take another metaphor, a portable armoury of legalweapons. Nowhere more than in its maxims does the robust good sense of the common law ofEngland display itself; and does not one of those very maxims warn the critic that no one ought to bewiser than the laws? The maxims of English law, like the rules of the common law, derive theirsources and sanction from an immemorial antiquity, from frequent judicial recognition, and from theconception of the sages of of our law. One writer, indeed%Wingate%has gone so far as to describethem as prime emanations of the Eternal Wisdom. Their usefulness may be said to increase, ratherthan to diminish, as the law grows more complex and involved, for they bring back the mind to firstprinciples. Maxims touch, if they do not cover, the whole field of law%the theory of the Kingssovereignty, the office of a judge, the first principles of law, public policy, marriage, infancy, crime,evidence, the interpretation of statutes and legal instruments, and many other matters. LatinMaxims, Sweet and Maxwell, p. 113-4; Encyclopdia of the Laws of England "2nd#, vol. ix. p. 100;1. You absolutely mustknowwhoyouare at all times!!!2. Always, always, always demand someones authorityfor doing or saying or demand-

ing whatever it is they are doing or saying or demanding;If government, they absolutely must have a delegation of authority to do or demandwhatever they are doing or demanding; And, they must have acertifiedstatute authorizingthe delegation of such authority; And, the peculiar statute absolutely must be founded upon apeculiar article and clause of the certified Constitution for that particular sovereign stateand the certifiedConstitution for the United States of America;Also, there absolutely must be an enforceable contract upon which their demands arefounded!

Page 5


6/48

3. If someone is demanding payment from you there absolutely must be an enforceable con-tract and an original executed instrument loaningmoney to you and avalidated debt!Without allthree of those things, there is no debt!

4. Always, always, always refuteeverything claimed against you. everythingnot refuted is pre-sumed true at law! hence, is not required to be proved by the claimant: a fundamental rule ofdebate. The word understand does not mean to comprehend the meaning of something:Its correct definition is, to agree, to accept, see Webster, 1828. Hence, if oneunderstands something stated, either verbally or written, he agrees or accepts that

statement and a contract is created! Hence, it is imperative to declare you do not understandthe all capital letter name they use against you and equally imperative is to declare that youdo not understand the physical address or street address or mailing address they useagainst you; as well as all their demands of you to force them to prove their claims against you.

5. Remember the simple common law concept offictitious entities, ss. fiction at law; Thatconcept is erroneously known throughout the so-called patriot movement as thestrawman. If you do not use the correct terminology you automatically place yourself into theirfictitious jurisdiction %You lose! But he denied it before all of them, saying, I do notunderstand what you are saying. Mat. 26:70 (Emphasis added);

6. Remember the differences between the State of Georgia, The State of Georgia,THESTATE OF GEORGIA, state of Georgia, the sovereign state of Georgia, Georgia state:Those are not identical terms;

7. Remember the correct name for our country is America or united States of America.The United States or United States or THE UNITED STATES or UNITED STATEScorrectly means Washington, D. C. or the central, national government at Washington, D.C.or the municipal corporation created at Washington, D.C. posing as a government,particularly the Government of the United States; Its all a matter of English grammar,which hasnt been taught in public schools since World War II! See hint at 28 U.S.C.A.1746, Pub.L. 94-550 1"a#(1976); 90 Stat. 2534; 16 Stat. 419;Additionally, Chief Justice Nathaniel Chipman clearly explains in His treatise, Principles ofGovernment..., how and why the constitution for the United States of America did notcreate a federal government, as well as many other pertinent things intended by theFounding Generation, to which He belonged: despite everything we are persistently told. Or,in the words of Judge Andrew Napolitano, Lies the Government told You;Also recognize: U.S. Constitution and constitution for the United States of America are

absolutelynot

the same identical instrument.U.S. Constitution

is the charter forWashington, D.C. municipal corporation created Feb. 21, 1871 "16 Stat. 419#; while

constitution for the United States of America is the historical instrument draughted atPhiladelphia, Penna. during 1787 and ratified between 1787 and 1791: See: 16 Stat. 419 & 15Stat. 223 & Military Laws of the United States, Trueman Cross, 1825 & U.S.A. v. Cooper, infra;Also recognize, every entity having a name beginning with U.S., such as U.S. Congress,U.S. District Court, U.S. Court of Appeals is established under Article I of theConstitution having limited jurisdiction to within Washington, D.C. and certain fewislands in the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea. The Domestic Mail Manual, sec. 608.2& the International Mail Manual explain the foregoing in harmony with the following:

District Courts of the United States. The term, as used in the rules, without an additionexpressing a wider connotation, has its historic significance. It describes the constitutional courtscreated under Article 3 of the Constitution. Courts of the territories are legislative courts, properly

speaking, and are not District Courts of the United States. Vesting a territorial court with jurisdictionsimilar to that vested in the District Courts of the United States does not make it a District Court ofthe United States. Mookini v. United States, 303 U.S. 201, 82 L. Ed. 748, 58 Sup. Ct. Rep.543.

The term does not include the United States District Court of Puerto Rico. That court is acongressional court as distinguished from a constitutional court. Porto Rico Railway, Light & PowerCo. v. Colom "C. C. A. C1# 100 Fed. "2d# 345. Supplement for Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1942;

That definition clearly exposes U.S. courts are truly courts of Congress established under Article ISection 8, ...tribunals inferior to the supreme court of the United States. They are not courts inlaw and equity authorized under Article III ofconstitution for the United States of America. Theyare administrativetribunals enforcingadministrative procedures and policyover all Places

Page 6


7/48

purchased... (emphsasis added) by the national government at Washington City for thepurposes expressed in the Constitution, ...for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, docks-Yards, and other needful Buildings; (emphasis added) ss. Custom Houses and Court Houses,which is not authorized anywhere by the constitution for the United States of America; But, isexercise of authority over property and franchises of the federal government as an individualentity. See Wheeling Steel Corp. vs. Fox, supra. Article III courts are entitled, courts of theUnited States,supra. Consider jury instructions, directed verdict: From Bouv. 6th ed. "1856#:

EMBRACERY, crim. law. An attempt to corrupt or influence a jury, or any way incline them

to be more favorable to the one side than to the other, by money, promises, threats, orpersuasions; whether the juror on whom such attempt is made give any verdict or not, orwhether the Verdict be true or false. Hawk. 259; Bac. Ab. Juries, M 3; Co. Litt. 157, b, 369, a;Hob. 294; Dy. 84, a, pl. 19; Noy, 102; 1 Str. 643; 11 Mod. 111, 118; Com. 601; 5 Cowen, 503;

Following are a sampling of warnings from various esteemed personages, to wit:

(J)udges were faithful to the Constitution for most of the nations history% from thefounding, in fact, through the first third of the twentieth century. But sometime in the 1930s,the wheels began to come off. Judge Douglas Ginsburg;

If the courts are free to write the Constitution anew, they will, by God, write it the way themajority wants; the appointment and confirmation process will see to that. This, of course, isthe end of the Bill of Rights, whose meaning will be committed to the very body it was meantto protect us against: the majority. Justice Antonin Scalia;

(W)hile the Constitution remains unaltered, it must be construed now as it was understoodat the time of its adoption.: Justice Sutherland from Chief Justice Taney from Ch. J.Chipman, Principles of Government..., from the Law of Contracts, from the Law of Agents,from certain Maxims of Law: See Table of Authorities infra;

If the government, police and prosecutors could always be trusted to do the right thing, therewould have never been a need for the Bill of Rights. J. Levanthal, U.S. v. U.S. District Courtfor the Central District of California, 858 F.2d, 534 "9th Circ.#;

They(Americas Founders) conferred, as against the government, the right to be let alone %the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized man. J. Brandeis,Olmstead v. U.S., 277, U.S. 438, 478;

There is no more cruel tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the

colors of justice. U.S. v. Jannottie, 673, F.2d 578, 614 quoting Montesquieu, Of the Spirit ofthe Laws;

The surreptitious creation of fictional state within a state known alternately as this stateand the state and the two-letter state code, TX, NM, VA, MD, etc., and zip code isdocumented at 4 U.S.C.S. 104 - 113; 31 CFR Part 51.2; American Banana Co. v. U.S. FruitCo., 213 U.S. 347; U.S. v. Spear, 338 U.S. 217; N.Y. Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm, 268 U.S. 29;Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S. Ct. 465, 476; Schwartz v. OHaraTP School Dist., 100A 2d. 621, 625, 375 Pa. 440; &c. Also see, Domestic Mail Manual "sec.608.2# and International Mail Manual; Those fictitious states are deemed Federal areas forextending federal legislation, codes, rules, regulations, policies, guidelines beyond the tenmile square area defined by the Constitution. Being an act of congress they are necessarilysubordinate to the whims of congress and the ever mushrooming administrative agenciescreated by it and the executive. The Federal areas are also revealed in the wording

contained in various Texas Codes, for instance, Texas Tax Code under the sales taxchapter and Texas Penal Code under Territorial Jurisdiction, and elsewhere.

(T) he America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard round the world no longer is castin the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image. ChiefJustice Warren Burger, Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 ; Czar, Czarina. Recall with theReagan/Bush juntaczars for certain operations began being appointed: Czar is a Russiantitle of nobility. Article I Section 9 of the constitution for the United States of Americaexpressly forbids any manner of Title of Nobility. Yet every year the professed presidentand professed congress appoint more-and-more czars and czarinas! See: Art. I 9 &10; Military Laws..., T.Cross, p. 16;

Page 7


8/48

Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness isnot our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as ourheritage. The Constitution was designed to keep government off the backs of the people.The Bill of Rights was added to keep the precincts of belief and expression, of the press, ofpolitical and social activities free from surveillance. The Bill of Rights was designed to keepagents of government and official eavesdroppers away from assemblies of people. The aimwas to allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights against government.Justice Douglas: Laird vs. Tatum, 408 US 1 at 28;

The high office of president has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the Citizens of this plight. President JohnFitzgerald Kennedy, 12th Nov. 1963 at Columbia University;

The solution to our current problems isnt government: government is the problem. (sic)President Ronald Reagan, c. 1982;

The problem really isnt government % the real problem is the peoplein government. (sic)Vincent Dale Ross, Ph.D., FACMT, Dec. 2007, McQueeny, Texas;

I doubt that there is a judge in full possession of all his faculties, would rule that the 14thAmendment was properly approved and adopted. State v. Philips, 540 P.2d. 936 "1975#;Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d. 266;

Americans now have a form of dual citizenship. Everyone born within one of the several states

of the Union is an American Citizen. At some time later they take on the additionalcitizenship as a U.S. Citizen through various means. For instance paying Social Security andusing the Postal Service automatically over-rides the superior status ofAmerican Citizen bythe status U.S. Citizen. United States of America v. Austin Gary Cooper, 89-109-Cr-Hoeveler, DCSF1, 1990; United States of America v. Austin Gary Cooper, 90-5597, "11th C.C.App.#; (Note: Article I tribunal ! )

That premise is contrary to American Law, but survives in full force and effect for controlling themasses. By the Rule of Law"maxims# and Reason, an inferior can never over-ride, automaticallyor otherwise, anysuperior! There are numerous Maxims of Law which that decision violates! SeeTable of Authorities infra. The above is avery revealing declaration plainly exposing the fraudbeing perpetrated and your escape route to Freedom.

The due process clause of the Fifth Amendment guarantees to each Citizen theequal protection of the laws and prohibits a denial thereof by any Federal official

.(Emphasis added.) Bolling v. Sharpe, 32 U.S. 497.

The Fourth Amendment forbids stopping a vehicle even for the limited purpose ofquestioning its occupants unless the police officer has a founded suspicion of criminalconduct. (Emphasis added.) United States v. Ramirez-Sandoval, 872 F2d 1392

Founded suspicion exists when the officer is aware of specific articular facts, that, togetherrational inferences draws from them, reasonably warrant a suspicion that the person to bedetained has committed or is about to commit a crime. United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411,416; United States v. Robert L., 874 F2d 701, 703.

The United States Supreme Court has defined and limited investigative detention. Anyrestraint of a person for the purpose of checking identification and asking questions ordetaining him or her briefly while obtaining, is such a detention; it comports with the Fourth

Amendment only when based on articular facts supporting a reasonable suspicion that theperson has committed a criminal offense. The mere presence with someone who hasoutstanding arrest warrant is not sufficient. United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221, 83Led2d 604; (Note: The United States Supreme Court is absolutelynot the same entityas Supreme Court of the United States! As Bill Claves, American Voice Radio, says, Its allin the words, folks) Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;

A demand for identification is an intrusion on the interest prohibited by the FourthAmendment and requires a reasonable suspicion based on articular facts relating to theperson or his or her conduct, in order to be lawful.

Page 8


9/48

When police officers, with or without arresting an individual, detain the individual for thepurpose of requiring him to identify himself, they perform a seizure of person subject to therequirements of the Fourth Amendment...that the defendant's conviction requiringidentification upon a lawful police stop was improper, the police officers stopping thedefendant's First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment was in violation of the FourteenthAmendment of the united States Constitution when the police officer has no reasonablesuspicion to believe that the defendant was engaged or had been engaged in criminalconduct. Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 46"1979#; 61 Led2d 357;

That is more sophistry, because, by definition, any detention of any nature for any reason whatsoeveris an arrest. See Bouviers Law Dictionary, Kent, Commentaries; Story, Constitution; BlackstonesCommentaries; Whartons Treatise, numerous Maxims of Law, and other authorites infra. No policenor law enforcement officer, has lawful authority to stop, detain, nor arrest any one without alawful warrant in his hand to present to the one he approaches, except if and only if the copactually sees some one in the act of committing a felony, that is to say, an act of violence.Almost all acts declared offenses today are not crimes, by the definition of the word, and virtuallynone of those defined as felony are felonies by the definition of that word! False arrest and falseimprisonment are the current way of life throughout America: See Table of Authorities, infra;

Territorial jurisdiction of the United States extends only outside the boundaries of landsbelonging to any of the fifty states. 18 U.S.C., 7

The laws of Congress in respect to those matters ,outside of Constitutionally delegated

powers. do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in theDistrict of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the nationalgovernment. Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211

...The states are separate sovereigns with respect to the federal government...Heath v. Ala. 474 U.S. 187

All legislation is prima facie territorial. American Banana Co. v. U.S. Fruit, 213, U.S. 347 at357-358; ,Ss., restricted to Washington, D.C.);

...The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction,sovereigntyoreminentdomain, within the limits ofastate or elsewhere, except in thecase in which it is expressly granted... (each state) is therefore entitled to sovereignty andjurisdiction over all territory within her limits, subject to the common law. (Emphasesadded.) Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 213, 221, 223;

The American Government is one of limited powers, congressional powers re enumeratedsignifying that powers not delegated are reserved. No clause or combination of c;lauses allowscongress to commandeer the legislative process of the States by directly compelling them toenact and enforce a federal regulatory program, and such compultion is inconsistant withthe Constitutions division of authority between federal and state governments....Where afederal interest is sufficiently strong to cause Congress to legislate, it must do so directly; itmay not conscript state governments as its agents. Even shuld states originally agree to someregulatory scheme is irrelevant for States are not mere political subdivisions of the UnitedStates. State governments are neither regional officer nor administrative agencies of theFederal Government....The Federal Government may not compel the States to enact oradminister a federal regulatory program. Our American federal system was designed toprotect liberty. New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144; Printz v. United States, Mack v.United States, 521 U.S. 898; S. Ct. 2365; 138 L. Ed. 2d 914;

Here, again, is where they use U.S. citizen, the two-letter state code, zip codes, and spellingwords usingALL CAPITAL LETTERS to evade Americas Constitution and the inherent Rights ofAmericans secured and guaranteed by the constitution for the United States of America. Its allin the words, folks! Bill Claves, American Voice Radio; Be sure to carefullyread the Preamble tothe Constitution! Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;

A citizen cannot be taken by force from his house to be conducted before a judge or toprison. Dig. 50, 17, 103;

Every mans house should be a perfectly safe refuge. Every mans house is his castle; and eventhough the winds of heaven may blow through it, the king (government) cannot enter it. A

Page 9


10/48

mans dwelling-house is his castle and fortress, not merely for his own personal protection,but also for the protection of his family and his property therein. 3 Inst. 162; 5 Coke, 91b; 11Coke, 82; 5 Coke, 91, 92; Broom, Max. 432; &c.;

Yet that is currently happening daily. Make particular note the specific and consistent use of theword house! The word home is notused in law documents. Keep that in mind and usage. Alsosee the articles on juries and jury duty. Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;

CHAPTER 151. LIMITED SALES, EXCISE, AND USE TAX

151.004. In This State

"In this state" means within the exterior limits of Texas and includes all territory withinthese limits ceded to or owned by the United States.

Pay particular attention to that definition. Excerpted from The State of Texas legislature web site,Texas Tax Code. That is additional positive proof of the frauds using fictions, particularly the two-letter state code, TX, Tx, Tx., &c. and zip code The sales tax, &c. are inapplicable withinthe true geographical area known as Texas! Everystate has a similar clause within their code aswell. Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;

And how about this bit of inconsistency, to wit:

The present Capitol building at Austin was begun construction February 1, 1882 as engraved

into the corner stone in the northeast corner of that building. Then if one braves theharassment and unlawful searches to wander inside to the Rotunda under the dome andlooks down at the floor, one sees the official seal for Republic of Texas! If Texas wasannexed or admitted into the United States of America union as another one of theseveral States of the Union during 1846, why, oh why, is the Great Seal of the Republic ofTexas boldly and indelibly displayed in the floor of the Capitol building created by and forthe State of Texas during 1882 - 1888 under the auspices of being one of the several Statesof the Union.? ! Could it be because the constitution for the United States of America doesnot delegate authority for admitting nor annexing any foreign nations into the AmericanUnion established during 1775-1791? Could it be because the Law of Nations recognizes noauthority for one sovereign nation to absorb another sovereign nation into itself? Hence, thepersistent existence of the republic of Texas has been suppressed through constructivefrauds, artifices, misprisions, and other egregious acts by professed public officers for

undisclosed purposes.Democracy. A government of the masses.Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form ofdirect expression.Results in mobocracy.Attitude toward property is communistic - negating property rights.Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate... without restraint or regard

to consequences.Results in demagoguism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.

United States Army Training Manual, 1928;

Dulocracy. A government where servants and slaves have so much license and privilege that theydomineer. Blacks Law Dictionary, 2nd, 3rd, 6th editions;

Always, always remember the word understand means to accept; to agree to something: see

Websters First Edition, "1828#. When one states, I understand. one is stating he agrees or heaccepts whatever is stated; that makes the consummation of an oral contract!Also keep close in mind, the word, officially does not mean formally nor even legitimately; itmerely means doing something by virtue of some authority incumbent upon a peculiar office one isholding and not by virtue of ones own right, ss. injureproprio . Be very wary. Its all in the words,folks! Bill Claves; Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;

The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government, upon vital questions,affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...thepeople will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent, practically resigned theirgovernment into the hands of that eminent tribunal. Abraham Lincoln;

Page 10


11/48

The people are the masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution,but to overthrow the men who pervert it. Abraham Lincoln;

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards out of men. Abraham Lincoln;

Convictions are non-negotiable. Rev. R. R. Bernard, "Thomas Yoder v. United States#;

In this world there is always danger for people who are afraid of it. George Bernard Shaw;

Courage is the human virtue that counts, courage to act on limited knowledge and insufficentevidence. Thats all any of us have. Robert Frost;

....judges should be withdrawn from the bench whose erroneous biases are leading us todissolution. It may, indeed, injure them in fame or fortune; but it saves the Republic.

Thomas Jefferson;The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as thelaws of God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchyand tyranny commence. John Adams (emphasis added);

Status quo is not agood thing, it is anonsequitor; In status quo there is no learning, thereis no growth: in the absence of growth, there is no change: in the absence of change, there isno progress: in the absence of progress, there is regress; Nothing can trulystay the same inour ever-changing Universe. Anon.;

All things change, and we change with them. Ancient Roman axiom;

Day by day, case by case, the Supreme Court is busy designing a Constitution for a country Ido not recognize. J. A. Scalia, "Board of County Commissioners v. Umbehr#;

Page 11


12/48

Claiming Title in Fee simple

1. Always, always, always remember land under American Law is conveyed and described onlyby metes and bounds. Every other description for land not by metes and bounds isfictitious. That is how the so-called mortgages and property taxes and zoningrestrictions are imposed, against some fictitious property description which people in theirignorance assume "ass- u- me# must be their land % WRONG ! Hence, people are buyingthin air on a thirty-year mortgage that is not a lawful mortgage with apromissory note"anegotiable instrument# and Deed of Trust behind the mortgage which is debauched byconflict of interest%without mutual valuable consideration as required under the Law ofContracts%more fraud. So, one bought thin air agreeing to pay monthly installments forthirty years using worthless paper % Now, what did one really get for his worthless paper?Mostly more worthless paper. One particular instrument given at the closing is useful forones capturing title process %One is given aWarranty Deed! That instrument declaresin writingunder seal, the highest form of legal instrument at common law, that no oneearlier in time has anyclaimto that land! So, under American Law and Law of Nations thatland is abandoned land. Abandoned land may be claimed by the first one who comes andsettles upon it ! ThatbeYou! So one simply need make claim to that parcel of land toperfect absolute "fee simple# title. Really quite simple to do. See: 2 Bl. Com. 258; Co. Litt. 6;Ib. 110b, 115a; Bouv. 148; 4 Inst. 275; 8 Coke, 92; 1 Bl. Com. 138; 2 Bl. Com. 2, 5 1 Kent, Com.108, 184; Taylor v. The Cato, 1 Pet. Adm. 53; Seymour v. Canandaigua & N.F.R. Co., 25 Barb.

"N.Y.# 284, 301; Fassett v. Smith, 23 N.Y. 252;Always, always, always remember: Noallodial title at common law! Absolute ownership atcommon law is known as fee simple or freehold: Simply read Websters Dictionary, FirstEdition "1828#; also in Funk & Wagnalls Standard College Dictionary"1966# or Judge Bouvieror Judge Kent or Justice Wilson or St. George Tucker or Sir Wm. Blackstone to learn theTruth !

LAND. This term comprehends any found, soil or earth whatsoever, as meadows, pastures, woods,waters, marshes, furze and heath. It has an indefinite extent upwards as well as downwards; thereforeland, legally includes all houses and other buildings standing or built on it; and whatever is in a directline between the surface and the centre of the earth, such as mines of metals and fossils. 1 Inst. 4 a;Woods Inst. 120; 2 B1. Com. 18; 1 Cruise on Real Prop. 58. In a more confined sense, the word landis said to denote frank tenement at the least. Shepp. Touch. 92. In this sense, then, leaseholdscannot be said to be included under the word lands. 8 Madd. Rep. 635. The technical sense of theword land is farther explained by Sheppard, in his Touch. p. 88, thus: if one be seised of some landsin fee, and possessed of other lands for years, all in one parish, and he grant all his lands in thatparish "without naming them# in fee simple or for life; by this grant shall pass no, more but the landshe hath in fee simple. It is also said that land in its legal acceptation means arable land. 11 Co. 55 a.See also Cro. Car. 293; 2 P. Wms. 458, n.; 5 Ves. 476; 20 Vin. Ab. 203.2. Land, as above observed, includes in general all the buildings erected upon it; 9 Day, R. 374; but tothis general rule there are some exceptions. It is true, that if a stranger voluntarily erect buildings onanothers land, they will belong to the owner of the land, and will become a part of it; 16 Mass. R.449; yet cases are, not wanting where it has been decided that such an erection, under peculiarcircumstances, would be considered as personal property. 4 Mass. R. 514; 8 Pick. R. 283, 402; 5 Pick,R. 487; 6 N. H. Rep. 555; 2 Fairf. R. 371; 1 Dana, R. 591; 1 Burr. 144; Bouviers Law Dictionary, 6thEdition; Co. Litt. 4; Co. Litt. 4a; 9 Coke, 54; 2 Bl. Com. 18; 2 Bouv. Inst. nn. 15, 70; Broom, Max. 395;

Always remember the Law of Contracts: "i# There must be an offer to perform somevaluable service or provide some valuable goods; "ii# There must be an acceptance; "iii#There must be two distinct "adverse# parties both of legal capacity, ss., 21 years of age,not mentally incapacitated nor drunken; "iv#; There must be a lawful purpose; "v# Theremust be mutual valuable consideration; "vi# There must be ameeting of the minds, ss., nofraud nor misrepresentation by either party and both parties must fully acknowledge andcomprehend all terms and conditions to said contract, ss. full disclosure. Without anyoneof those elements there is noenforceable contract.Next, the so-called mortgage companyneverloaned any money to you, neither did theypretend to do so by presenting a bank check or other negotiable instrument to you for your

Page 12


13/48

use. Hence, you did not receive mutual valuable consideration from them. Furthermore,credit cannot be loaned. Remember what Bill Claves on American Voice Radio says, Itsall in the words, folks. By not knowing the correct definitions of words used in legalinstruments one is destined for ruin. The Ashley case within Texas and the Credit Rivercases within Minnesota as well expose the above frauds. Additionally, RICO and tort suitswere filed in federal court Sept. 2010;Furthermore, the professed assignments are fraudulent as well! Assignments under lawmust be properly indorsed by all parties privy! Additionally, assignments which are

associated with land must be Recorded; and if a Deed of Trust is in effect thepromissory notemust at all times remain in the protective possesion of the Trustee!To lawfully make Claim to ones land merely create the Claim instrument in the nature of adeed in fee simple and have it Recorded into the county Records. Remember, filing andRecording are absolutelynot the same thing even though the county Clerks, or Recorders,belligerently claim otherwise. It is a simple matter to get your documents Recorded withoutpaying their so-called filing fee: Again, see Webster, 1828 for the correct definitions. Thatis another of their frauds to exact funds from you without legal authority. There is precisewording mandated for a Claim and Deed in fee simple. It developed over many generationsfor minimizing fraud and coercion regarding land conveyancing. During the 19th- and early20th centuries My research revealed the formal wording is quite consistent. The landscaptured during these last five years using this instrument remain unspoiled. From reading19th Century law books regarding land conveyancing the Claim instrument executed by thepurchaser is the final step for perfecting title and is Recorded with the Deed from theseller. That is in perfect harmony with the Law of Contracts and the sanctity of land atcommon law: The Deed from the seller acts as proof positive of his offer to sell; while theClaim executed by the purchaser acts as proof positive of his acceptance: Voil!, thelawful consummation of an enforceable contract conveyancing land.Next, be absolutely sure to post signs that expressly state, PrivateProperty along each ofthe boundaries to ones land and particularly at the entrance. Remove all foreign markings,particularly numbers from ones land and structures to positively sever ones land andproperty from the fictions they need to violate ones privacy and ones property. Yes -absolutely, even the so-called 9-1-1 numbers! All oftheir identifying markings - Its yourprivate property, not theirs. If one wishes, give ones land a name: Smiths Lazy Acre, forexample. Remember, George Washingtons Freehold is named, Mt. Vernon; Thomas

Jeffersons Freehold is named,

Montecello

; James Madison

s Freehold is namedMontpelier; HenryLight Horse Harry Lees Freehold is named, Stratford Hall; Robert

Edward Lees Freehold is named, Arlington; George Masons Freehold is named GunstonHall, as a few examples having historical prominence. Those places were not given namesbecause of their grandeur, they were given names because they were those Men s Freeholdsand so people knew where to find them. Or, if one is so inclined, place a sign at the entranceto ones land simply showing ones surname, not using all capital letters, for instance,Jones. Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;Remember, under American Common Law, Freeholders must act responsibly, reasonably,prudently and in their own Right. No one can do things for you, you must act for yourself.Thomas Jefferson wrote, ...you must know the law and be well-disposed to use it. TheSupreme Court of the United States has stated the same premise repeatedly in many differentways - Is any one listening? Judge Andrew Napolitano has found a catching way to say the

same thing using todays American vernacular: He states in His book, Constitutional Chaos:What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws, page 186, Sue theBastards. (sic.)LACHES. This word, derived from the French lecher, is nearly synonymous with negligence.2. In general, when a party has been guilty of laches in enforcing his right by great delay andlapse of time, this circumstance will at common law prejudice, and sometimes operate in barof a remedy which it is discretionary and not compulsory in the court to afford. In courts ofequity, also delay will generally prejudice. 1 Chit. Pr. 786, and the cases there cited; 8 Com.Dig. 684; 6 Johns. Ch. R. 360.

Page 13


14/48

3. But laches may be excused from, ignorance of the party s rights; 2 Mer. R. 362; 2 Ball &Beat. 104; from the obscurity of the transaction; 2 Sch. & Lef. 487; by the pendency of a suit; 1Sch. & Lef. 413; and where the party labors under a legal disability, as insanity, coverture,infancy, and the like. And no laches can be imputed to the public. 4 Mass. Rep. 522; 3 Serg.& Rawle, 291; 4 Henn. & Munf. 57; 1 Penna. R. 476. Vide 1 Supp. to Ves. Jr. 436; 2 Id. 170;Danes Ab. Index, h. t.; 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3911. Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition;

8. By American Law, lands have not been properly conveyed for several generations;hence, every one who believed they purchased land and dwelling are technically at lawtenants in adversity, or adversarial tenants, or in adversarial possession "squatters# andthe land remains unclaimed and therefore abandoned.

Land lying unoccupied is given to the first occupant. C.L.M.; Bl. Com.;A right descends, not the land. Co. Litt. 345;

Additionally, a fictitious entity, ss. U.S. citizen or corporation, cannot own a Freehold, bylaw: Hence, the use ofWarranty Deed today.

Allodialland is that possessed by a man in his own right, free and absolute, without owing anyrent or service (taxes) to any superior. 2 Bl. Com. 104; 3 Kent, Com. 495;

A right not vested in a person living, but merely exists in the consideration andcontemplation of law,is said to be in abeyance. Co. Litt. 342;

The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of

God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyrannycommence. John Adams;

Make particular note of the Rule of Law "maxim#: A right descends, not the land. Co. Litt.345; By American Law, aLast Will and Testament does not convey property of any nature,but merely expressed the Will, ss. instructions, intended by the deceased; Hence, theExecutor or Administrator is lawfully as well as morally encumbered to execute the true,complete, lawful instruments for conveyancing all properties pursuant to the Will which heis executing% Regrettably today, most people, if they actually have a Will, went to someattorney who draughted a standard will, a statutory instrument not alawful instrument,usually appointing themselves or their law firm as executor, then distributeassets pursuantto corporate codes, rules, regulations, policy instead of pursuant to law; And, lands are notlawfully conveyed as intended by the deceased and the heirs dont know the difference, sothis state or the state usurps control. The Executor absolutelymust execute aDeed in

fee simple to convey absolute title and the designated heirs absolutelymustmakeClaimin fee simple to that certain tract of land intended as his, or her, or their inheritance!

From Webster 1828:WARRANTY,n.Inlaw, a promise or covenant by deed, made by the bargainer for himself andhis heirs, to warrant or secure the bargainee and his heirs against all men in the enjoyment ofan estate or other thing granted. Such warranty passes from the seller to the buyer, from thefeoffor to foeffee, and from the releaser to the releasee. Warranty is real, when annexed tolands and tenements granted in fee or for life, &c. and is in deed or in law; and personal, whenit respects goods sold or their quality.In common recoveries, a fictitious person is called to warranty. In the sale of goods orpersonal property, the seller warrants the title; for warranty is express or implied. If a man sellsgoods which are not his own, or which he has no right to sell, the purchaser may have

satisfaction for the injury. And if the seller expressly warrants the goods to be sound and notdefective, and they prove to be otherwise, he must indemnify the purchaser; for the lawimplies a contract in the warranty, to make good any defect. But the warranty must be at thetime of sale, and not afterwards. Blackstone.

DEED, n. ,etym. omitted.) 1. That which is done, acted or effected; an act; a fact; a word ofextensive application, including whatever is done, good or bad, great or small.

And Joseph said to them, whatdeedis this which ye have done? Gen. xliv.We receive the due reward of our deeds. Luke xxv.

2. Exploit; achievement; illustrious act.Whosedeeds some nobler poem shall adorn. Dryden.

Page 14


15/48

3. Power of action; agency.With will anddeedcreated free. Milton.

4. A writing containing some contract or agreement, and the evidence of its execution;particularly, an instrument on paper or parchment, or conveying real estate to a purchaser ordonee. This instrument must be executed, and the execution attested, in the mannerprescribed by law.indeed, in fact; in reality.

These words are united and called an adverb. But sometimes they are separated by very, inverydeed; a more emphatical expression. Ex. ix.

DEED, v. t. to convey or transfer by deed; a popular use of the word in America; as, he deeded allhis estate to his eldest son.

Notice three very important words in the definition for warranty, to wit:

annexed, fee, fictitious;

A Warranty Deed is merely an annex to aTitle in fee simple! So, today is presented aWarranty Deed at the closing but then the buyer never perfects his Title infee byhis Claim to Land; so, the land continues in abandonmentunlessanduntil some oneexecutes Claim. Hence, the current procedures for conveying land across America are animplementation of the ancient Roman Civl Law concept emphyteosis, infra.

EMPHYTEOSIS, civil law. The name of a contract by which the owner of anuncultivated piece of land granted it to another either in perpetuity, or for a long time,on condition that he should: improve it, by building, planting or cultivating it, andshould pay for it an annual rent; with a right to the grantee to alienate it, or transmit itby descent to his heirs, and under a condition that the grantor should never re-enter aslong as the rent should be paid to him by the grantee or his assigns. Inst. 3, 25, 3. 18Toull. n. 144. 2. This has a striking resemblance to a ground-rent. "q. v.#. See NouveauDenisart, mot, Emphyteose; Merl. Reper. mot Emphyteose; Faber, De jure emphyt.Definit. 36; Code, 4, 66, 1. Bouv. 6th ed. "1856#;

9. To add additional layers of protection to your land title, you can Record MechanicsLiens against the fictitious property descriptions they use in their misleading documents;for example, theirphysical address or their 9-1-1 address or their street address andothers;

A sample Claim to Land as enacted by the Texas Legislature during February 1840 for ensuringFee simple land title follows. Because of the consistency of language developed during the 17th-and 18th centuries for conveyancing lands in fee simple, the sample Claim is correct for every Stateof the Union, with the obvious changes; and is guaranteed by Article IV, Section 1 and Article VI ofthe constitution for the United States of America, known as the Full Faith and Credit Clause andSupremacy Clause; And,

A sample Mechanics Lien follows. Again, the wording in these instruments is pertinent to all theseveral States of the Union: See Article IV, VI constitution for the United States of America; 28U.S.C.A. 1746, Pub.L. 94-550 1"a#(1976); 90 Stat. 2534;

The following instruments have been, and are being, used successfully within Texas and spreadinginto other states of the Union: American Law is American Law everywhere until the AmericanPeople take deliberate action to repeal or abolish the constitution for the United States of

America. Such acts have not yet transpired and are utterly unlikely to transpire: however, theAmerican People have been duped %grievously;

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.Henry David Thoreau;

Page 15


16/48

Within the Lands known as Maryland;

Know all Man by these presents, That I WilliamMichaelMcGann, and Wife, Megan

Lou, from Still Pond within Maryland aforesaid, having not found any one with lawful claims andhaving obtained warrant to possess, hereby make claim to all that certain tract of land described as,

to wit:

All that certain tract of land being 0.56 acre more or less lying and being situated within the

area known as Kent "county# within Maryland, approximately 4 miles south of Still Pond along

by Maryland Highway 6 South, the whole being more particularly described by metes and

bounds from a survey made on the ground under direct supervision and direction of Peter

Bushill Registered Professional Engineer No. 837 on 27th August, 1970, to wit:

Beginning at a point being an iron pin set in the ground approximately 636.62 ft. from the

centerline of Spratman Drive and 25 ft. from the centerline of Creek Lane along the westerly

right of way for Creek Lane being the southerly corner of this certain tract N 27 23 W, 195.36

feet to an iron pin set in the ground running consecutively along the northerly boundary forthe certain tract of land deeded to William Baker being the westerly corner of this certain

tract;

Thence, N 64 27 E, 125.00 feet to an iron pin set in the ground being the northerly corner

for this certain tract, running consecutively along southeasterly boundary for the certain tract

of land deeded to John Noonann and shared corner of the certain tract of land deeded to

James Shoemaker;

Thence, S 27 31 E, 187.04 feet to an iron pin set in the ground being the easterly corner for

this certain tract, running consecutively along southwesterly boundary for the certain tract of

land deeded to abovementioned James Shoemaker;

Thence, S 60 39 W, 125.45 feet running consecutively along westerly right of way for Creek

Lane to place of beginning, containing 0.56 acre more or less;

together with all and singular the rights, members, hereditaments, and appurtenances to the same

belonging, or in anywise incident or appertaining, to have and to hold and not abandon, all and

singular, the premises abovementioned, and I do hereby bind myself, my heirs, executors and

administrators, to warrant and forever defend all and singular the said premises against every person

whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same, or any part thereof.

Witness my hand and seal this 10th day of August in two thousand ten anno Domini; without theUnited States;

Page 16


17/48

When Recorded return to:

U.S.P.O. Postmaster,General Delivery,Re: George Jefferson Madison.Fredericksburg, Virginia."non-domestic#

ClaimofLien

Virginia. . At Law;Suffolk "county#. .

The undersigned Affiant appeared, George Jefferson Madison, who duly affirms that He is theLienor whose mailing address is U.S.P.O. Postmaster, General Delivery Re: George JeffersonMadison. Fredericksburg, Virginia. "non-domestic.# and that in accordance with a contract withGEORGE JEFFERSON MADISON AND WIFE MARTHA LOUISE "Debtor# Lienor hascontinuously furnished labor, materials, parts, supplies, repairs, electricity, water, replacementfencing and repairs, replacement plumbing and repairs, removing decrepit building and interior

sections, regular cleaning and laundry, holistic nursing and nurturing for abandoned or injured orpreviously abused large animals, holistic nursing and nurturing for abandoned or injured or previouslyabused small animals, holistic grooming for abandoned or injured or previously-abused large animals,holistic grooming for abandoned or injured or previously-abused small animals, holistic first aid forlarge animals, holistic first aid for small animals, fundamental holistic training for large animals,fundamental holistic training for small animals, researching holistic nutrition for large animals,researching holistic nutrition for small animals, holistic pasture care, researching holistic pasture care,replacing native grasses, replacing native plants, making emergency errands, making emergencyrepairs, keeping needed fundamental expense records, finding, moving, carrying, stacking differenthays when needed and other chores when needed for more than five years on all the followingdescribed real property within Suffolk (county), Virginia, to wit Being 71.65 acres of land more or less,being a part of the Jonathan Botetote Survey No. 2, Abstract No. 58, and being more particularlydescribed by metes and bounds and to include all surface and minerals on Exhibit A attached

hereto and made a part hereof owned by GEORGE JEFFERSON MADISON AND WIFEMARTHA LOUISE of a total value for the day of execution for this document three hundred ninetythree thousand seven hundred twenty seven "393,727# Dollars lawful money of the United States"specie# of which all remains unpaid since the 11th day in November anno Domini two thousandafter previous notices No. 04-0045354843 on 20th October 2003 A.D. and No.03-0036111005 on 29thJuly 2003 A.D..

Executed this 23rd day in March anno Domini two thousand six.

Affirmed: George Jefferson Madison.

Page 17


18/48

When Recorded return to:

U.S.P.O. Postmaster,General Delivery,Re: George Jefferson Madison.Fredericksburg, Virginia."non-domestic#

ClaimofLien

Virginia. .Suffolk "county#. .

The undersigned Affiant appeared, George Jefferson Madison, who duly affirms that He is theLienor whose mailing address is U.S.P.O. Postmaster, General Delivery Re: George JeffersonMadison. Fredericksburg, Virginia. "non-domestic.# and that in accordance with a contract withGEORGE JEFFERSON MADISON AND WIFE MARTHA LOUISE "Debtor# Lienor hascontinuously furnished labor, materials, parts, supplies, repairs, electricity, water, replacementfencing and repairs, replacement plumbing and repairs, removing decrepit building and interior

sections, regular cleaning and laundry, holistic nursing and nurturing for abandoned or injured orpreviously abused large animals, holistic nursing and nurturing for abandoned or injured or previouslyabused small animals, holistic grooming for abandoned or injured or previously-abused large animals,holistic grooming for abandoned or injured or previously-abused small animals, holistic first aid forlarge animals, holistic first aid for small animals, fundamental holistic training for large animals,fundamental holistic training for small animals, researching holistic nutrition for large animals,researching holistic nutrition for small animals, holistic pasture care, researching holistic pasture care,replacing native grasses, replacing native plants, making emergency errands, making emergencyrepairs, keeping needed fundamental expense records, finding, moving, carrying, stacking differenthays when needed and other chores when needed for more than five years on all the followingdescribed real property within Suffolk (county), Virginia, to wit Being 71.65 acres of land more or less,being a part of the Jonathan Botetote Survey No. 2, Abstract No. 58, and being more particularlydescribed by metes and bounds and to include all surface and minerals on Exhibit A attached

hereto and made a part hereof owned by GEORGE JEFFERSON MADISON AND WIFEMARTHA LOUISE of a total value for the day of execution for this document three hundred ninetythree thousand seven hundred twenty seven "393,727# Dollars lawful money of the United States"specie# of which all remains unpaid since the 11th day in November anno Domini two thousandafter previous notices No. 04-0045354843 on 20th October 2003 A.D. and No.03-0036111005 on 29thJuly 2003 A.D..

Executed this 23rd day in March anno Domini two thousand six.

Affirmed: George Jefferson Madison.

Page 18


19/48

The first Lien encumbers the land and the fictitious entities they created as pretended owners at

common law. The second Lien encumbers the land and the fictitious entities they created as pretend

owners in their fictitious administrative realm. By specifying payment in lawful money of the United

States they must pay you in the gold and silver coin mandated by the constitution for the United

States, which at this writing equals fifteen Federal Reserve Notes for each silver United States Dollar coin

Thats a buncha money!

If you wish, you may also create a Lien against the fictitious property descriptions they create for

their control, tax, zoning purposes. Be sure to send the Liens to the Recorders office to provide

Public Notice of your position.

As a last resort, or if you have difficulties getting into a Circuit Court of the United States, you can

sidetrack them by presenting a Promissory Note as payment for all lawfully assessed property

taxes. Since there are no lawfully assessed property taxes on private property of any nature, they

are stopped dead. The Texas Tax Code, as well as all other states, expressly authorizes payment of

taxes by notes for two reasons, the only lawfully assessed property taxes are against corporate-

owned property, notes are standard corporate exchange, and Federal Reserve Notes are current as

legal tender, they have no choice but to accept your Promissory Note even though they absolutely

despise doing so. One Promissory Note is all that is necessary to pay all past and future professed

taxes. Have it Recorded into the county Records wherein the property lies with instructions on the top

to immediately send it to the professed tax assessor/collector. They can do nothing. Accurate

Knowledge properly exercised is Power ! (Susy Cammack.)

A sample follows:

Page 19


20/48

Registered Mail ___________________________________________

29 October 2007

To: Dianne Bolin

DIANNE BOLIN, RTA, CTA

KERR COUNTY

Junction Highway,Kerrville, Texas.

From: William Michael McGann.

c/o 12 Vine Creek Drive,

Kerrville, Texas

Notice of Default: RECORDED PURSUANT TO TEXAS PROPERTY CODE 12.001

NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS: NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS

Applicable to all successors and assigns: Silence is Acquiescence and Dereliction of Duties;

This is a PIA request in accordance with TGC 552 and TTC 1.11

Daniel Troxel, Stephen Ables, Charles Sherrill, and McCREARY, VESELKA, BRAGG & ALLEN, P.C.,

have defaulted my lawful demands, persistently refusing to reply and present a validated claim against me.

Additionally, I am unaware of having any contracts with you obliging me to compulsory performance of

any type whatsoever.

Despite their dishonesty and default, anticipating your lawful reply to this demand, and in the interest of

expediency, I annex a PROMISSORY NOTE for payment in full upon my receiving all of the

following documents:1. Full, complete, unadulterated, legible, certified copies of any and all contracts between you

and me that obliges me to compulsory performance of any type;

2. The Tax Assessment as required by Texas statutes (TTC6.23);

3. The Tax Bill as required by Texas statutes (TTC31.01);

4. A certified copy of your Oath of Office, job description, and full and complete contact

information for your Risk Management Provider and Bond;

5.The name of the law firm with which you contract if a debt is uncollected;

6. True, Complete, Certified copies of statutes and Constitution delegating your authority,

your lawful procedures, and my obligations to you;

A no response or a non-response does and will constitute a default by you granting me recourses in

addition to Liens. Your response is due within 20 days from your receiving this re-quest. Please respond

to me as above instructed.

Annex: PROMISSORY NOTE

Page 20


21/48

PROMISSORY NOTE

Twenty three days after date, I, William Michael McGann, hereby promise to pay to Dianne Bolin, DBA

DIANNE BOLIN, the full sum upon the lawful demand by assessment and bill against me as required by

Law and statutes.

Subscribed and executed this 29th day of October in the year of our Lord two thousand seven without the

UNITED STATES under the Laws of the United States of America and Texas, one of the several North

American republics.

All Rights Reserved at arms length,

William Michael McGann.

Page 2 of 3

Page 21


22/48

That, further the affiant sayeth naught. Subscribed and executed this __________ day of

____________________________ in the year of our Lord Two Thousand Seven (2007 A.D.) at Kerr,

Texas

William Michael McGann.

NOTICE

Using a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion or trust, nor does it alter my status in

any manner. The purpose for notary is verification and identification only and not for entrance into any

foreign or fictitious jurisdiction.

JURAT

Texas. }

} At Law;

Kerr (county). }

}

Subscribed and affirmed before me this _______ day of _________________________________ in the

year of our Lord Two Thousand Seven (2007 A.D.).

Notary:

Page 3 of 3

Page 22


23/48

A right not vested in a person living, but merely exists in the consideration andcontemplation of law, is said to be in abeyance. Co. Litt. 342;

It is not incumbent on the possessor of property to prove his right to his possessions. Code.4, 9, 2; Broom, Max. 465, 639, 714; Co. Litt. 110b, 115a; Fleta, lib. 3, cv. 15, s. 6; Co. Litt. 6;Branch, Princ.; Bouv. 148;8 Coke, 92; Dig. 50, 17, 11;

The right of property is that sole and despotic dominion which one man claims and exercisesover the external things of the world, in total exclusion of the right of any other individual. 1

Bl. Com. 138; 2 Bl. Com. 2, 5, 199, 311;The next two rules of law nullify the currently circulating concept ofEminent Domain, which is asocialist and totalitarian concept loudly expounded by Karl Marx during the middle decades of the19th Century.

It is unjust that freemen should not have the free disposal of their own property. Co. Litt.223a;4 Kent, Com. 131;

No man is compelled to sell his own property, even for a just price. 4 Inst. 275;

Also, when one reads 3 Kent, Com. and Webster, 1828, as well as Bl. Com. regarding title of landsin fee simple the professed Eminent Domain sublimates spontaneously! Supra, That perverseconcept succeeds and is founded solely upon the fact that no one knows about perfecting title tothe lands theythought they purchased! Accurate Knowledge properly exercised is Power! Theyhave usurped both, each of us must individually recapture both: with the help and support of their

friends, neighbors, relatives, and colleagues, ss. Peers: See Amicus Curi in Bouvier. By friends,neighbors, relatives, colleagues lodging Amicus Curi into suits a form of class-action suit atcommon law is created putting a lot more pressure on the court to behave properly than if one goes italone. It is truly a simple matter lodgingAmicus Curi, but is very powerful because there is safetyand strength in numbers and the court is plainly told that they are being watched carefully. Thecourts can and do far too easily brush aside some one filing alone; But when some one files and agroup files in his support, light is turned onto the darkness, they are exposed and are forced toproperly behave under the watchful eyes of a group. Also, do not forget to notify newspapers ormagazines to expose and add more pressure onto the court. That s what has been missing %cohesion among the American people. They have been particularly successful at instilling fear anddividing and conquering the American People.

Things taken or captured by pirates and robbers do not change their ownership.1 Kent, Com. 108, 184;

Also note:Remedies for rights are ever favorably extended. Bouv. 155; Bouv. Inst. 2411; 4 Coke, 92b,93;Co. Litt. 197b; Broom, Max. 192; Branch, Princ.;

Money being restored does not set free the party offering. Co. Litt. 207;

There is no disputing against a man denying principles. Co. Litt. 343;

The master or principal (elected or appointed officer) shall answer for the acts of his servantor accessory. 4 Inst. 114; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1337; Lofft, 227, 229;

That last Rule of Law is how to remove governors, judges, attorneys general, district attorneys,justices of the peace, sheriffs, clerks, D.P.S., county sheriffs, cops, tax assessors/collectors,appraisers, county commissioners, mayors, and other professed government employees who arepretended to have immunity! Simply go into the Circuit Court of the United States the only

lawfulcourt within Texas, or any other state today, demandingcertificationoftheir authoritywith the certified statutewith the certified Article and Clause in the constitution for theUnited States of America and Constitution for Texas, or other Sovereign State such assovereign state of Maryland, &c., upon which their authority is founded. That procedure is knownas Discovery; It is a civil proceeding only in courts in equity under Common Law inconjuction with a lawsuit for any breach or tort. Through Discovery one has power to compelproduction of documents. If whomsoever one is suing through Discovery and compellingproduction of documents refuses to provide particularly and precisely everything demanded ofthem, they are in contempt of court and go to jail. Because Discovery is acivil proceeding, ss. aflesh-and-blood man suing another flesh-and-blood man, imprisonment for civil contempt of

Page 23


24/48

court has no limitations on its duration, as criminal contempt of court has. Hence, the Defendantstays in jail for as long as he, or she, continues refusing presenting exactly everything demanded ofthem. If he or she persists refusingproduction he, or she, will remain in jail for the rest of his orher natural life. Thats the power that each and every American has over public officials, cops,judges, and every one else who causes injury % Thats why they need Americans to remainignorant, scared, and confused! See: This Authors separate article entitled Discovery; For detailedinformation see: Story, Eq. Jur.; Story, Eq. Pldg.; Bouvier; Hilliard; Chapin; Kent; Blackstone; &c.;

By the way, county sheriff is unknown at law: By definition a sheriff is the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of a county, not the countycops. He is the county equivalent to a town or city Mayor! Undertodays corporate color of law and cover of authority the Chief Executive Officer of each countyhas been demoted to being a local corporate militarized security-force exacting funding from alltravelers or U.S. citizens at whim %See Webster, 1828 for the definition ofhighwayman and forbarratry!

One of the things Judge Napolitano wrote with which this Author cannot agree is, Congress shouldpass a law requiring the government to obey the law. That is utter nonsense and unworthy of someone having His experience and credentials. There are many Rules of Law"maxims# that have existedfor centuries having that very desired effect. Also, the Law of Torts and the Law of Contractswell cover malfeasance, misfeasance, non-feasance, negligence, fraud, misprision,assault, battery, false imprisonment, manstealing, kidnapping all of which are routinelycommitted by professed government employees daily. If you do not defend yourself, your family,

your property, your Rights your Liberty, no one else can and no one else will! A republican form ofgovernment is aparticipatory form of government! The appropriate way to participate is to Suethe Bastards when they get out of line! See Webster, 1828 for the definition ofremonstrance.Its all about Due Process of Law. Simply stated, if one is ignorant ofDue Process of Law one hasno Rights, has no standing, and gets no redress: And with redress for torts comes damagesin money! Once you get into some ones pocketbook every one else will leave you alone.Damages are of two natures, compensatory, for ones actual out-of-pocket expenses andcosts of property lost or destroyed or damaged, which also encompasses ones Labor to Sue theBastards, travels, as well as everything else; Andexemplary, which are additional payments over-and-above expenses and losses actually suffered, as punishment "amersements# for the malignantbehavior suffered. The only thing those bullies understand is money. They have no qualms stealingfrom you under color of law and cover of authority, but they are loathe to pay you! An example ofexemplary damages: For false imprisonment, a jury at Tampa Bay, Florida "circa 1984# awarded a

man more than 62,300 Dollars per hour for false imprisonment by the city cops. That willdefinitely end their harassments.

Things dissimilar ought not to be joined. Jenk. Cent. 24, marg.

That which is similar denotes a partial resemblance only, unless the context indicatesotherwise. Blacks, 1089;

What is like is not the same; for nothing which is like or similar to another is the same, i.e. nolikeness is exact identity. 4 Coke, 18; Co. Litt. 3a; 2 Bl. Com. 162;A name is not sufficient if athing or subject for it does not exist by law or by fact. 4 Coke,107b;

Names are the notes ofthings. Names are the symbols ofthings. 11 Coke, 20; Bouv. 142;

Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name tobe essential. Monroe Cattle Co. vs. Becker, 147, U.S. 47, 58;Calling things by the same name does not obliterate the differences between them.Cincinnati R.R. vs. Kentucky, 115, U.S. 321, 337;Where truth is, fiction of law does not exist. Blacks, 494; Bouv. 127;

A fiction of law injures no one. 3 Coke, 36; 3 Bl. Com. 43;

Yet, they use fictions to injure people and evade American Law daily!

In the fiction of law there is always equity; a legal fiction is always consistent with equity. 11Coke, 51a, 90; Broom, Max. 127, 130;

Page 24


25/48

Fiction is a poor ground for changing substantial rights. C.L.M.;

Fictions arise from the law, and not law from the fictions. Bouv. 136;

Fiction of law is wrongful if it works loss or injury to any one . 2 Coke, 35; 3 Coke, 36;3 Bl. Com. 43 Broom, Max. 122; (Emphases added.)

Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent acts. Tray. Leg. Max.482; Finch, Law, b. 1, c. 3, n. 8

The mandate of an immoral or illegal thing is void. Dig. 17, 1, 6, 3;

Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin. Dig. 50, 17, 29;

Fraud is not purged by circuitry(sophistry). Fraud deals in generalities. Bacon Max. reg. 4;Broom, Max. 228; Tray. Leg. Max. 162; 2 Coke, 34a; 3 Coke, 81a;

It is fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Story, Eq. Jur. s. 389, 390;

He acts in fraud of the law who, though the letter of the law being inviolate, uses the law con-trary to its intention. Dig. 1, 3, 29;

Gross negligence is equivalent to fraud. Blacks 2nd 304, 698; Dig. 11, 6, 1; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 646;

Misconduct binds its own authors. It is a never-failing axiom that every one is accountableonly for his own offense or wrong. Ersk. Inst. 4, 1, 14;

Want of skill is reckoned as culpa; (sic) that is, as blamable conduct or neglect. Dig. 50, 15, 132;

Make particular note: Things are not People! Things are inanimate objects. The above Rulesof Law defeat the so-called strawman, ss. the ALL CAPITAL LETTERS NAME and physicaladdress and STREET and CITY and TOWN and STATE and zip code, all of which arefictitious entities.

You do not have aName nor NAME !Here is the proof for never using nor responding to the word name so desperately necessary to thecorrupt courts, etc. My experience in the purported Kerr county court during December, 2006 whenthey kidnapped Me for contempt of court and after I had been there for days charged Me withfurther contempt without even having an appearance in a court demonstrates the significance ofgiving them your name. It took them nearly one month to devise a way around Mynot givingthem a name! Hence, I have been grievously injured by deprivation of unalienable rights. Remedylays in law and in equity in the circuit courts of the United States for the violation ofanyright

pursuant to Article IV, Article VI, andBill of Rights

of

Supreme Law of the Land

. Please notice:courts of the United States are not the same as the U.S. courts: See Ballentines Law Dictionary

1942 Supplement,District Court.

NAME, n. (...L.nomen; )1. That by which a thing is called;...A name may be attached to an individual only, and

is thenproperor appropriate, as John, Thomas,London,Paris;

PROPER, adj. (...L.proprius;...)1. Peculiar; naturally or essentially belonging to a person or thing. (2. omitted for clarity.)3. Ones own. It may be joined with any possessive pronoun; as ourproperson. Shak.

(Note. Own is often used in such phrases; at your own proper cost. This is reallytautological, but sanctioned by usage, and expressive of emphasis.)

4. Noting an individual; pertaining to one of a species, but not common to the whole; as apro-

-pername. (Emphases added.) Dublin is the proper name of a city.PRONOUN n. (...L.pronomen, for, name;...)In grammar, a word used instead of a noun or name, to prevent the repetition of it. The personalpronouns in English areI, thou oryou,he,she, we,ye and they...

(Authors note: thou is singular, e.g. Thou, Harry. Ye is plural, e.g. Ye, Harry and Amy.The passing of thou and ye from common usage prompted the Southern vernacularyall or you all to clarify singular you and plural you. See, the South really was rightabout some thing!)

Page 25


26/48

SURNAME,n. (Fr.surnom; It.soprannome; Sp.sobrenombre; L.superandnomen.)1. An additional name; a name or appellation added to the baptismal or christian name, and

which becomes a family name. Surnames, with us, originally designated occupation, estate,place of residence, or some particular thing or event that related to theperson. Thus WilliamRufus orred; EdmundIronsides; Robert Smith, or the smith; William Turner.

2. An appelllation added to the original name.Mysurname Coriolanus. Shak.

The above from Websters Dictionary, First Edition, 1828.

proper name . A persons Christian or first name. Ones proper name has been used from themost distant times to distinguish the particular individual from his fellows. It was originally the onlyname recognized by the law, and has always been considered an essential part of the name of anindividual. 19 R. C. L. 1327. Ballentines Law Dictionary, 1930.

And now for the coup de grce :nomen "Latin#A debt or debtor. Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.

Is there any doubt why we are not taught Latin in school any longer?! Its all in the words % folks!Bill Claves; Terminology is destiny. Justice Antonin Scalia;

From Bouviers Law Dictionary:

LETTER CARRIER. A person employed to carry letters from the post office to the persons to

whom they are addressed.2. The act of congress of March 3, 1851, Statutes at Large of U. S. by Minot, 591, directs, _10, That itshall be in the power of the postmaster general, at all post offices where the postmasters areappointed by the president of the United States, to establish post routes within the cities or towns,to provide for conveying letters to the post office by establishing suitable and convenient places ofdeposit, and by employing carriers to receive and deposit them in the post office; and at all suchoffices it shall be in his power to cause letters to be delivered by suitable carriers, to be appointed byhim for that purpose, for which not exceeding one or two cents shall be charged, to be paid by theperson receiving or sending the same, and all sums so received shall be paid into the post officedepartment: Provided, The amount of compensation allowed by the postmaster general to carriersshall in no case exceed the amount paid into the treasury by each town or city under the provisions ofthis section.3. It is further enacted by c. xxi. s. 2, That the postmaster general shall be, and he is hereby,

authorized to appoint letter carriers for the delivery of letters from any post office in California orOregon, and to allow the letter carriers who may be appointed at any such post office to demand andreceive such sum for all letters, newspapers, or other mailable matter delivered by them, as may berecommended by the postmaster for whose office such letter carrier may be appointed, notexceeding five cents for every letter, two cents for every newspaper, and two cents for every ounce ofother mailable matter and the postmaster general shall be, and he is hereby, authorized to empowerthe special agents of the post office department in California and Oregon to appo

Documents

Key to America